02.06.2014 Views

2012 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2012 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

2012 PROCEEDINGS - Public Relations Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theme 6: Concerns<br />

Thirteen articles, or 7% <strong>of</strong> the dataset, were categorized as relaying some type <strong>of</strong> concern<br />

about the use <strong>of</strong> new communication technologies in public relations. Three sub-themes<br />

emerged: legal (5 articles), risk (5 articles), and ethics (3 articles).<br />

Legal<br />

Hallahan (2004) identified ―five major culprits‖ (p. 255) that posed legal problems to<br />

organizations via the Internet: ―attackers, hackers, lurkers, rogues, and thieves‖ (p. 255). For<br />

each, he described legal ramifications and possible means <strong>of</strong> protection.<br />

Other articles discussed the role <strong>of</strong> the Internet in litigation public relations (Reber,<br />

Gower, & Robinson, 2006), the dangers <strong>of</strong> assuming business blogging is fully protected by the<br />

First Amendment (Terilli, Driscoll, & Stacks, 2008), commercial speech concerns related to<br />

CEO blogging (Terilli & Arnorsdottir, 2008), and cautions in responding to anonymous Internet<br />

speech (Terilli, Stacks, & Driscoll, 2010).<br />

Risk<br />

Using a cultural studies approach, Mickey (1998) took a critical look at the relationship<br />

between the technology industry and education. He warned: ―In the 1930s many argued that<br />

television would make for a more educated society but television became a vehicle to sell goods<br />

and services. The Internet is moving along the same path‖ (p. 335). Strobbe and Jacobs (2005)<br />

raised concerns about news becoming commodified through online press release services.<br />

In a BledCom keynote address, Hiebert (2005) suggested that new communication<br />

technologies could ―save democracy‖ (p. 1) but cautioned that ―the pathway ahead for public<br />

relations is strewn with landmines‖ (p. 1). Included in his landmines were privacy invasion,<br />

identity theft, information inequities, and cyberterrorism. He also acknowledged that new media<br />

could ―become tools <strong>of</strong> tyranny and suppression‖ (p. 8) but that ―what happens will ultimately<br />

depend on what we let happen, how vigilant we will be, how much we listen, and how much we<br />

participate in the world around us‖ (p. 8).<br />

Robards (2010) wrote about privacy concerns in his examination <strong>of</strong> how young<br />

Australians used social media. In their content analysis <strong>of</strong> PRSA‘s <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> Tactics, a<br />

publication widely distributed to college students, Taylor and Kent (2010) observed a blatant<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> the risks associated with using social media in public relations practice and<br />

called for a reconsideration <strong>of</strong> how the pr<strong>of</strong>ession is socializing students.<br />

Ethics<br />

In 1995, Judd wrote about the role <strong>of</strong> ethics in the information age: ―While we may view<br />

it as amoral, a means to an end, technological innovation unsettles old values and creates new<br />

views <strong>of</strong> the world. Practitioners face a challenge‖ (p. 36). He went on to suggest ways to<br />

establish credibility for organizations in the midst <strong>of</strong> technological change.<br />

Related articles revealed that nondisclosure harms relationship building in social media<br />

environments (Sweetser, 2010) and the importance <strong>of</strong> corporations not only discussing ethical<br />

parameters on websites, but also building relationships with publics beyond just shareholders<br />

(Bowen, 2010).<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!