01.06.2014 Views

Simple analytical models of glacier-climate interactions - by Prof. J ...

Simple analytical models of glacier-climate interactions - by Prof. J ...

Simple analytical models of glacier-climate interactions - by Prof. J ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

In these lectures I present simple <strong>analytical</strong> <strong>models</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>glacier</strong>s and the interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>glacier</strong>s with <strong>climate</strong>. Do such <strong>models</strong> make sense in a time that computer power is almost<br />

unlimited?<br />

May be it is a matter <strong>of</strong> taste.<br />

Glaciers shape their own surface <strong>climate</strong>. The height-mass balance feedback (HBMfeedback<br />

in the following) is the dominating mechanism. It is a direct consequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fact that the specific balance increases with altitude (and this is because air temperature<br />

decreases with altitude and precipitation increases with altitude). It is the HMB-feedback<br />

that may turn small <strong>glacier</strong>s into huge ice sheets. Without the HMB-feedback the glacial<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> the Pleistocene would not have occurred.<br />

Therefore, if we want to study how <strong>glacier</strong>s and ice sheets grow and shrink, we need to<br />

know about their geometry. In many cases the details are not important. For instance, if<br />

we prescribe climatic conditions in such a way that the specific balance above the ablation<br />

line is constant, the precise form <strong>of</strong> the ice sheet-pr<strong>of</strong>ile above this line does not matter!<br />

For valley <strong>glacier</strong>s we will see that it is the relation between mean surface elevation and<br />

<strong>glacier</strong> size that matters.<br />

These lectures do not form a systematic treatment, but have a kaleidoscopic nature. There<br />

is a general idea, however. The philosophy is that <strong>glacier</strong>-<strong>climate</strong> <strong>interactions</strong> should first<br />

<strong>of</strong> all be considered as a continuity problem, in which the <strong>glacier</strong> mechanics can be<br />

strongly parameterised and most <strong>of</strong> the attention goes to the total mass budget.<br />

The material presented in these lectures can also be found in:<br />

• C.J. van der Veen (1999): Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Glacier Dynamics. Balkema, 406 pp.<br />

• J. Oerlemans (2001): Glaciers and Climate Change. Balkema, 148 pp.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!