THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive

THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive

preteristarchive.com
from preteristarchive.com More from this publisher
30.05.2014 Views

72 The Hope of Israel: What Is It? Thus we find that the promise to Abraham embraced the gift of the whole world, and that the true and sole heir of that promise is Jesus Christ; though, through God's wondrous grace, those who believe in Christ are reckoned "the children of God. And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ" (Rom. 8:16, 17). And this makes it impossible that there should be a future fulfilment of the promise in the realm of "that which is natural" (1 Cor. 15:46). "THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE HEIR" But the Scripture does not leave the matter there. Chapter III of Galatians states the positive side of the truth, showing, and with all the clearness that could be asked, that Christ and His people are the true "Israel of God" (6:16), the seed of Abraham and heirs of the promises; but chapter IV presents the negative side of the same truth, making it evident that the natural Israel has no longer any standing before God, or any part in His future purposes. And further it is shown that the setting aside of "Israel after the flesh "is not a new revelation given to Paul, but was to be found in the 0. T. records. For there is evident reproof in the words : "Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman" (Gal. 4:21, 22). Paul's question implies that those who construed the Scriptures in the sense that is now-a-days mis-called "literal," should have known better. And he goes on to show that these things "are an allegory," in which Hagar stands for the old covenant and her son, Ishmael, for the natural Israel ; whereas Sarah represents the new

The Hope of Israel: What Is It? 73 covenant and Isaac the true Israel, the seed of Abraham, the heirs of the promise. And the climax of the lesson is found in the words of Sarah, which the apostle here declares to be the voice of Scripture; for, in declaring what was to be the outcome of the controversy between the natural Israel, that which "was born after the flesh," and the true Israel, that which "was born after the Spirit," and which was being persecuted by the natural Israel, he says: "Nevertheless, what saith the Scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman." And he concludes with this comforting statement: "So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free." It is superfluous to say that these New Testament Scriptures make certain that the national restoration of Israel after the flesh is not a part of the revealed will of God, but that the reverse is true. THE PERIOD OP THE JUDGES The period of the Judges is one of repeated departures by the people of Israel from the right ways of the Lord, and of repeated lapses into idolatry. Yet He exercised great patience and long forbearance with them, not casting them off for one offence, or for many ; but permitting them to have one bitter experience after another at the hands of their enemies, to teach them that their welfare, and indeed their very existence as a nation, depended upon their faithfulness to Him and their obedience to His law. And again and again, during that long period of decline, He intervened for their deliverance by "the hand of one and another of the Judges.

72 <strong>The</strong> Hope of Israel: What Is It?<br />

Thus we find that the promise to Abraham embraced<br />

the gift of the whole world, and that the true and sole<br />

heir of that promise is<br />

Jesus Christ; though, through<br />

God's wondrous grace, those who believe in Christ are<br />

reckoned "the children of God. And if children, then<br />

heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ" (Rom.<br />

8:16, 17). And this makes it impossible that there<br />

should be a future fulfilment of the promise in the<br />

realm of "that which is natural" (1 Cor. 15:46).<br />

"<strong>THE</strong> SON <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE HEIR"<br />

But the Scripture does not leave the matter there.<br />

Chapter III of Galatians states the positive side of the<br />

truth, showing, and with all the clearness that could<br />

be asked, that Christ and His people are the true<br />

"Israel of God" (6:16), the seed of Abraham and<br />

heirs of the promises; but chapter IV presents the<br />

negative side of the same truth, making it evident that<br />

the natural Israel has no longer any standing before<br />

God, or any part in His future purposes. And further<br />

it is shown that the setting aside of "Israel after the<br />

flesh "is not a new revelation given to Paul, but was<br />

to be found in the 0. T. records. For there is evident<br />

reproof in the words : "Tell me, ye that desire to<br />

be under the law, do ye not hear the law? For it is<br />

written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid,<br />

the other by a freewoman" (Gal. 4:21, 22).<br />

Paul's question implies that those who construed the<br />

Scriptures in the sense that is now-a-days mis-called<br />

"literal," should have known better. And he goes on<br />

to show that these things "are an allegory," in which<br />

Hagar stands for the old covenant and her son, Ishmael,<br />

for the natural Israel ;<br />

whereas Sarah represents the new

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!