THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive

THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive THE HOPE OF ISRAEL - The Preterist Archive

preteristarchive.com
from preteristarchive.com More from this publisher
30.05.2014 Views

60 The Hope of Israel: What Is It? king over them; and he also foretold what would be the consequence thereof (Deut. 28:36). That wicked act on their part was to be the culmination of apostasy ; for it meant their repudiation of the sovereignty of Jehovah. We have His own word for this ; for He said to Samuel, when commanding that prophet to give them their desire, "They have not rejected thee; but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them" (I Sam. 8:7). That kingdom therefore was not "the kingdom of God," preached by John and Christ. So far from its being the kingdom of God, the truth is that its establishment involved the setting aside of the kingdom of God. And it was not "the kingdom of heaven," for what the people demanded was a kingdom of earthly character, "like all the nations." It is strange indeed, therefore, that any Christian expositor should regard the proclamation of Christ and His forerunner as the announcement of the restoration of that kingdom, born of apostasy and rebellion; and the more so after God had plainly spoken concerning it, saying, "I gave thee a king in Mine anger, and took him away in My wrath" (Hos. 13:11). Moreover, this ending of that odious kingdom is precisely what Moses had foretold long before it came into existence. For his words were, "The Lord shall bring thee, and thy king which thou shalt set over thee, unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known" (v. 36). That, of course, was the Babylonian captivity. The kingdom ended then, but not the nation. And in agreement with this historical fact, the prophecy of Moses goes on to speak of the subsequent experience of the nation, as an experience of continued servitude to, and oppression by, other nations. It shows too that the post-captivity period was to be an

The Hope of Israel: What Is It? 61 era in which they should have, not peace and plenty in their land, but dearth, distress, and various other miseries and afflictions (vv. 37-48). The fact that Moses speaks of the continued existence of the nation after the Babylonian captivity affords strong reason for the belief that his prophecy gives the history of the nation down to its very end. From this alone we have warrant for the conclusion that from the national destruction wrought by the Romans there was to be no recovery. That, of course, was not the view of the Jewish teachers, who, "because they knew not the voices of the prophets" (Ac. 13:27), and because their thoughts and desires were carnal, interpreted the promises as pertaining to a kingdom of the very same sort as their forefathers had demanded of Samuel one "like all the nations."

60 <strong>The</strong> Hope of Israel: What Is It?<br />

king over them; and he also foretold what would be<br />

the consequence thereof (Deut. 28:36). That wicked<br />

act on their part was to be the culmination of apostasy ;<br />

for it meant their repudiation of the sovereignty of<br />

Jehovah. We have His own word for this ;<br />

for He said<br />

to Samuel, when commanding that prophet to give<br />

them their desire, "<strong>The</strong>y have not rejected thee; but<br />

they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over<br />

them" (I Sam. 8:7). That kingdom therefore was not<br />

"the kingdom of God," preached by John and Christ.<br />

So far from its being the kingdom of God, the truth<br />

is that its establishment involved the setting aside of<br />

the kingdom of God. And it was not "the kingdom of<br />

heaven," for what the people demanded was a kingdom<br />

of earthly character, "like all the nations." It is strange<br />

indeed, therefore, that any Christian expositor should<br />

regard the proclamation of Christ and His forerunner<br />

as the announcement of the restoration of that kingdom,<br />

born of apostasy and rebellion; and the more so<br />

after God had plainly spoken concerning it, saying, "I<br />

gave thee a king in Mine anger, and took him away in<br />

My wrath" (Hos. 13:11).<br />

Moreover, this ending of that odious kingdom is precisely<br />

what Moses had foretold long before it came into<br />

existence. For his words were, "<strong>The</strong> Lord shall bring<br />

thee, and thy king which thou shalt set over thee, unto<br />

a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have<br />

known" (v. 36). That, of course, was the Babylonian<br />

captivity. <strong>The</strong> kingdom ended then, but not the nation.<br />

And in agreement with this historical fact, the prophecy<br />

of Moses goes on to speak of the subsequent experience<br />

of the nation, as an experience of continued<br />

servitude to, and oppression by, other nations. It<br />

shows too that the post-captivity period was to be an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!