29.05.2014 Views

F&N Bulletin Vol 23 No 1b - United Nations University

F&N Bulletin Vol 23 No 1b - United Nations University

F&N Bulletin Vol 23 No 1b - United Nations University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Difference in goiter rates between regular and<br />

occasional users of iodized salt in Mongolia<br />

Chieri Yamada and Dalphjabin Oyunchimeg<br />

Editorial introduction<br />

This paper was accepted for publication not only for its<br />

positive findings but also for a negative observation. On<br />

the positive side, it is of interest there was no difference<br />

in goiter and urinary iodine excretion between families<br />

that regularly used iodated salt and those that used it<br />

only half of the time. The former constituted 20% of<br />

the families and the latter 30%. The possibility must be<br />

recognized that the five groups differed in other factors<br />

in addition to iodated salt consumption. Ultrasound<br />

examination is not needed to determine iodine-deficiency<br />

disorder status when urinary iodine excretion is available.<br />

However, since it was used in this study, it would<br />

have been desirable to determine the relative size of the<br />

goiters and not just their presence or absence.<br />

On the negative side is the observation that the consumption<br />

of iodated salt was limited by a price that was<br />

three to seven more than noniodated salt. When salt was<br />

first fortified with potassium iodate in Guatemala in<br />

1956, iodated salt was being sold in the <strong>United</strong> States<br />

at the same price as noniodated salt. When it was ascertained<br />

that the cost of iodizing salt with potassium<br />

iodate in Guatemala was so small per kilogram that it<br />

did not justify an increase in the retail cost of salt, the<br />

decree requiring universal iodation of salt for human<br />

consumption so specified. Potassium iodate was used<br />

for the first time instead of potassium iodide because<br />

studies of the Institute of Nutrition of Central America<br />

and Panama (INCAP) demonstrated that its iodine<br />

was equally available [1] and that it could be added<br />

with only a small loss, even under unprotected tropical<br />

conditions [2]. This meant that there was no need to dry<br />

and refine it and sell it in moisture-proof packages or<br />

to increase the price.<br />

Chieri Yamada is affiliated with the Department of Nursing,<br />

School of Health Sciences, Hirosaki <strong>University</strong>, Hirosaki,<br />

Japan. Dalphjabin Oyunchimeg is affiliated with the Department<br />

of Public Health, Ministry of Health, in Ulaanbaatar,<br />

Mongolia<br />

Mention of the names of firms and commercial products<br />

does not imply endorsement by the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> <strong>University</strong>.<br />

Today the water-insoluble potassium iodate is the<br />

basis for salt iodation in developing countries, since<br />

the quality and packaging of the salt are unimportant<br />

to its correction of iodine deficiency. Salt with iodine<br />

should not cost the consumer significantly more than salt<br />

without iodine, but there are complicating circumstances.<br />

In Mongolia refined iodated salt must reach rural areas<br />

through a geographically difficult supply chain, and<br />

it cannot be expected to be sold at the same price as<br />

crude local salt. Nevertheless, there is no justification<br />

for the huge price differential observed by the authors.<br />

This violates the human rights of the population and is<br />

unacceptable. There should be no economic obstacle to<br />

substituting iodated salt for noniodated salt.<br />

There is clearly a need for any agency that promotes<br />

the national iodation of salt in countries to ensure it<br />

is not made a pretext for price-gouging of those most<br />

in need. Unfortunately, governments sometimes do not<br />

recognize the importance of having salt with iodine<br />

available at the lowest possible cost and impose valueadded<br />

taxes and other taxes on it, as is currently the<br />

case in Mongolia. Locally gathered salt can be cheaper,<br />

therefore, because producers do not pay these taxes. The<br />

recent initiative by the Asian Development Bank and<br />

UNICEF to promote the universal iodation of salt in<br />

the countries of Central Asia and Mongolia calls for the<br />

removal of all tariff barriers to the production and sale<br />

of iodated salt. This has been accepted as a requirement<br />

for financial support by all of the participating countries,<br />

and when implemented, should improve the prospects<br />

for affordable salt in Mongolia.<br />

Remarkably, soon after this editorial was first drafted,<br />

the same authors submitted a Letter to the Editor (page<br />

108) that provides an excellent response to it. Recognizing<br />

that a high price for iodated salt was inhibiting its use,<br />

particularly in rural areas, they initiated a pilot study<br />

using a simple method of adding potassium iodate to<br />

the local crude salt at the village and family level in<br />

three villages. The resulting salt sold for a price similar<br />

to that for noniodized salt. It is clear that this approach<br />

is labor intensive, and, as they note, it would require a<br />

strong communication and education program. For these<br />

Food and Nutrition <strong>Bulletin</strong>, vol. <strong>23</strong>, no. 1 © 2002, The <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> <strong>University</strong>. 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!