Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance
Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance
Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Positive</strong> <strong>Deviance</strong> for nutrition in<br />
Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas,<br />
Central African Republic (CAR)<br />
A pilot project of WWF and CAR Ministry of Health<br />
<strong>Sonia</strong> <strong>Blaney</strong>, <strong>Ph</strong>.D., <strong>Dt</strong>.p.<br />
UNICEF-Indonesia<br />
<strong>Positive</strong> <strong>Deviance</strong> Forum<br />
Bali, 19-21 January 2010
Outline<br />
• Context<br />
• Description of the health and nutrition project<br />
• PD process<br />
• PD results<br />
• PD follow up<br />
• Lessons learned
CAR: Landlocked in the fragile centre of Africa<br />
Chad<br />
Sudan<br />
Nigeria<br />
Darfur<br />
Cameroon<br />
CAR<br />
Rebellion or internal conflict<br />
Source: Hamburg University<br />
Gabon<br />
Congo<br />
DRC<br />
Uganda
CAR: A fragile state, left behind in a violent<br />
region<br />
Of the 10 bottom countries on the HDI, only CAR and DRC haven’t advanced since 1985<br />
Human Development Index (HDI) Growth, Base = 100 (1985)<br />
Burkina Faso, Niger, Guinea-Bissau,<br />
Mali, Mozambique, Chad, Ethiopia<br />
CAR<br />
DRC<br />
+45%<br />
+30%<br />
+15%<br />
100<br />
-15%<br />
1985 1990<br />
1995 2000 2004<br />
Source: HDR (2007)
Central African Republic…<br />
• One of the poorest country in Africa: GDP: $328/year/cap, (UNDP, 2007)<br />
• Human Development Index: 172/177 countries (UNDP, 2007)<br />
• Life expectancy: 44 years (UNDP, 2007)<br />
• Under-five mortality: 173/1000<br />
• Stunting prevalence: 43%, Wasting: 12%, Underweight: 29% (UNICEF,<br />
2010)<br />
• Natural resources are an important food source in rural areas
Dzanga‐Sangha Protected Areas location
• Population:<br />
– 6,188 inhab.; CU5: 1,426 (23%); PW: 191 (3%) (WWF/GTZ, 2007, 2008)<br />
– Different ethnic groups: Ngaya (29%) and BaAka (23%) (Kamisse, 2007)<br />
– One town (Bayanga) and 6 villages<br />
• Undernutrition rate among CU5 (Bayanga):<br />
– 44% stunted, 21% underweight, 5% wasting (WWF/MoH, 2008)<br />
• Care practices among children and women<br />
(Health center statistics, 2008)<br />
– Immunization coverage: BCG: 43%, DTP3: 77%, Measles: 71%<br />
– < 50% of PW with > 1 ATV, 75% with IFA, 46% malaria prevention<br />
(amodiaquine), 7% of PW < 18 y.o.<br />
– No data on feeding practices
• Access to health:<br />
– I health center (Bayanga) and 2 health posts, 1<br />
trained nurse, 4 health agents, one TBA<br />
– Bayanga: 1 safe water site; Villages; 5/5 with at<br />
least 1 safe water site
Health/nutrition project(1)<br />
• Before December 2007:<br />
• Use of funds (similar activities from one year to another) for<br />
health and nutrition activities to cover treatment fees of<br />
pop., no defined objectives<br />
• No joint planning with stakeholders (communities, line<br />
ministries, NGOs)<br />
• Early 2008: Review of project objectives and workplan<br />
• Meeting with communities<br />
(e.g. Bayanga chiefs) and MoH rep.<br />
(department)
Health/nutrition project(2)<br />
(and PD initiation)<br />
• Implementation of project activities<br />
• Census of all children under‐five (CU5) and pregnant women<br />
• Assessment of nutritional status of CU5<br />
• Capacity‐building: GMP and IYCF counseling, planning and budgeting<br />
• Immunization support (logistics)<br />
• Malaria prevention<br />
• Development of IEC materials<br />
• Monitoring and evaluation<br />
• Supply (scales, bednets, boards, drugs)<br />
• Support to the establishment of a<br />
revolving‐fund to ensure sustainable drug<br />
supply<br />
Meeting with communities on how to address undernutrition<br />
(based on results and UNICEF framework)<br />
Bongoville: 22%; Jolisoir: 24%<br />
Introduction to the PD approach in 2 neighborhoods
PD process (1)<br />
• Training of health personnel on PD (9 health center<br />
staff and 3 community health agents)<br />
• Creation of a health village committee (including<br />
criteria for selection of members, definition of the<br />
job description, recruitment of the 5<br />
members/committee)<br />
• Orientation and training of health committees<br />
members on PD (2)<br />
• Preparation of PD survey<br />
• Review of secondary data on health and<br />
nutrition<br />
• Development and pre‐test of tools such as<br />
observation grids and questionnaire<br />
• Mapping of communities (e.g. type of houses,<br />
infrastructures, access, location of U5 and PW,<br />
etc.)<br />
• Wealth ranking of households, calendars of<br />
food availability, market survey
PD process (2)<br />
• Implementation of the PD survey:<br />
• Identification of health resources in the communities (healer, TBA, retired health<br />
staff, vendors)<br />
• Interviews and observations amongst 10 HHs at meal time during the evening (same<br />
socioeco characteristics but with U5 well and undernourished based on underweight<br />
results) per neighborhood (see grid)<br />
• Data analysis to identify good and poor behaviors<br />
• Good behaviors: exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life, encouragements to<br />
the child to eat at meal time and, bathing young children twice a day<br />
• Poor behaviors: traditional treatment of diarrhoea (‘lavement’), hand washing without<br />
soap before meal, insufficient number of meals (1‐2 on a daily basis) and lack of animal<br />
source of food in child diets<br />
• Meetings with the communities (e.g. leaders, parents) for feedbacks and<br />
implementation of PD<br />
• This includes the selection of two key and “feasible” behaviors to be adopted during PD<br />
period and maintained in the future (hand‐washing of child and mother with soap before<br />
giving meal and ensuring 2‐3 meals per day to the child)
PD process (3)<br />
• Design of PD sessions along with mothers, fathers, leaders, health committees<br />
– Agreement on number of foyers based on results on undernutrition (Bongoville: 40,<br />
Jolisoir: 23 children with weight‐for‐age < ‐2 z‐scores)<br />
– Agreement on criteria of success (400 g after 12 days) and criteria for refusal (2 days<br />
of absence, no attendance of mother/father) to the foyers<br />
– Selection of the volunteers mothers (2/foyer, 5 foyers)<br />
– Planning of PD menus with focus on local available food<br />
– Planning of IEC sessions (definition of topics, preparation of materials, see schedule)<br />
– Additional intervention agreed: deworming<br />
– Agreement on contribution of each “stakeholder”:<br />
• Contribution of project to the purchase of cooking pots and utensils (one set per<br />
foyer, kept at the chief place) and contribution to the purchase of meat/chicken<br />
• Contribution of the neighborhood: safe water<br />
• Contribution of health center: dewormers<br />
• Contribution of mothers: provide food such as oil, vegetables, staple food, fruits,<br />
peanut paste, etc.<br />
• Contribution of health committee members:<br />
• Home visit for deworming (day 1) and daily collection of food from the mother<br />
• Mid‐day visit to get the mothers coming on time to PD session<br />
• Organization of PD session (e.g. purchase meat/chicken, ensure that<br />
materials is available on time, complete, clean, hand‐washing, etc.)
PD process: Sessions (1.5 hours)<br />
• Greetings of mothers by health committee members<br />
and health staff<br />
• Weight measurement of children and questions about<br />
illnesses and meals pattern in the past 24 hours<br />
• Installation of the mothers/children<br />
• IEC sessions accompanied by encouragements of<br />
mother to put in practices the two selected healthy<br />
behaviors<br />
• Hand‐washing with soap of children and mothers<br />
• Consumption of meal with help of mothers/fathers<br />
• Hand‐washing with soap and return to home
Results<br />
• On total, 5 PD groups:<br />
– 60 children for the 12‐day period (attendance 95%)<br />
– Bongoville: 76% and Jolisoir: 50% of children gained weight (400 g)<br />
– Cause of “limited” success:<br />
• A child can not eat too much: “if he has eaten well at noon, he does not<br />
need another good meal in the evening”<br />
• Mother availability to prepare food for the evening meal, Jolisoir vs<br />
Bongoville: more HH involvement in agriculture<br />
• No late evening meal: the child was sleeping<br />
– Follow up (monthly GMP)<br />
– Most of them (55) did not lose weight after the PD sessions but maintained<br />
or kept gaining weight<br />
– Promotion of appropriate IYCF (in particular, number and composition of<br />
meals) and hand‐washing with soap
Post PD activities (Bongoville and Jolisoir)<br />
• Health services:<br />
– Monthly monitoring by health center chief of supply and revolving fund to ensure<br />
sustainability (e.g. vaccines, dewormers)<br />
– Unicef continuous support in bednets supply (for PW and newborns)<br />
– GMP at community level and health center/post accompanied by IEC sessions and<br />
counseling to parents on IYCF, distribution of bednet<br />
– Update with MoH on project activities and results (department and provincial levels)<br />
– Support to the establishment of mother groups<br />
• Village chiefs and health committees:<br />
– Support to monthly GMP session at community level and health post, follow up of<br />
children with undernutrition (support to identification of HH challenges, discussion with<br />
families and in particular with the head of HH, encouragements)<br />
– Development of a community micro‐ POA with the objective of improving health/nutrition<br />
of children and mothers (use of other funds)<br />
• Mothers:<br />
– Advocacy to their peers for improvement of feeding practices<br />
– Formation of mother support groups (2) for the promotion of breastfeeding (Pregnant and<br />
breastfeeding mothers)
Lessons learned<br />
• Involvement of parents, local authorities and MoH essential in<br />
all steps of the process<br />
• Knowledge of local context (e.g. populations, customs and<br />
beliefs, etc.) indispensable<br />
• Establishment of a “trust” relationship<br />
• Selection of appropriate “team members” (e.g. trained and<br />
motivated health staff as well as motivated mothers,<br />
motivated health committee members)<br />
• Proper training and follow up<br />
• Dissemination of results at all levels (e.g communities,<br />
department, donors)<br />
• Potential to lead to other types of projects/partnerships
Overall project result<br />
Undernutrition in Bayanga,<br />
% children 0-59 mo (n=496) with score Z ≤ -2, weight/age<br />
May-September 2008<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
Mai<br />
Juin<br />
Juillet<br />
Août<br />
Sept<br />
National rural<br />
National urbain<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Beretia Assabisse Mokoko Bomitaba Bongo Ville Jolisoir Bayanga National<br />
2006