29.05.2014 Views

Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance

Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance

Sonia Blaney, Ph.D., Dt - Positive Deviance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Positive</strong> <strong>Deviance</strong> for nutrition in<br />

Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas,<br />

Central African Republic (CAR)<br />

A pilot project of WWF and CAR Ministry of Health<br />

<strong>Sonia</strong> <strong>Blaney</strong>, <strong>Ph</strong>.D., <strong>Dt</strong>.p.<br />

UNICEF-Indonesia<br />

<strong>Positive</strong> <strong>Deviance</strong> Forum<br />

Bali, 19-21 January 2010


Outline<br />

• Context<br />

• Description of the health and nutrition project<br />

• PD process<br />

• PD results<br />

• PD follow up<br />

• Lessons learned


CAR: Landlocked in the fragile centre of Africa<br />

Chad<br />

Sudan<br />

Nigeria<br />

Darfur<br />

Cameroon<br />

CAR<br />

Rebellion or internal conflict<br />

Source: Hamburg University<br />

Gabon<br />

Congo<br />

DRC<br />

Uganda


CAR: A fragile state, left behind in a violent<br />

region<br />

Of the 10 bottom countries on the HDI, only CAR and DRC haven’t advanced since 1985<br />

Human Development Index (HDI) Growth, Base = 100 (1985)<br />

Burkina Faso, Niger, Guinea-Bissau,<br />

Mali, Mozambique, Chad, Ethiopia<br />

CAR<br />

DRC<br />

+45%<br />

+30%<br />

+15%<br />

100<br />

-15%<br />

1985 1990<br />

1995 2000 2004<br />

Source: HDR (2007)


Central African Republic…<br />

• One of the poorest country in Africa: GDP: $328/year/cap, (UNDP, 2007)<br />

• Human Development Index: 172/177 countries (UNDP, 2007)<br />

• Life expectancy: 44 years (UNDP, 2007)<br />

• Under-five mortality: 173/1000<br />

• Stunting prevalence: 43%, Wasting: 12%, Underweight: 29% (UNICEF,<br />

2010)<br />

• Natural resources are an important food source in rural areas


Dzanga‐Sangha Protected Areas location


• Population:<br />

– 6,188 inhab.; CU5: 1,426 (23%); PW: 191 (3%) (WWF/GTZ, 2007, 2008)<br />

– Different ethnic groups: Ngaya (29%) and BaAka (23%) (Kamisse, 2007)<br />

– One town (Bayanga) and 6 villages<br />

• Undernutrition rate among CU5 (Bayanga):<br />

– 44% stunted, 21% underweight, 5% wasting (WWF/MoH, 2008)<br />

• Care practices among children and women<br />

(Health center statistics, 2008)<br />

– Immunization coverage: BCG: 43%, DTP3: 77%, Measles: 71%<br />

– < 50% of PW with > 1 ATV, 75% with IFA, 46% malaria prevention<br />

(amodiaquine), 7% of PW < 18 y.o.<br />

– No data on feeding practices


• Access to health:<br />

– I health center (Bayanga) and 2 health posts, 1<br />

trained nurse, 4 health agents, one TBA<br />

– Bayanga: 1 safe water site; Villages; 5/5 with at<br />

least 1 safe water site


Health/nutrition project(1)<br />

• Before December 2007:<br />

• Use of funds (similar activities from one year to another) for<br />

health and nutrition activities to cover treatment fees of<br />

pop., no defined objectives<br />

• No joint planning with stakeholders (communities, line<br />

ministries, NGOs)<br />

• Early 2008: Review of project objectives and workplan<br />

• Meeting with communities<br />

(e.g. Bayanga chiefs) and MoH rep.<br />

(department)


Health/nutrition project(2)<br />

(and PD initiation)<br />

• Implementation of project activities<br />

• Census of all children under‐five (CU5) and pregnant women<br />

• Assessment of nutritional status of CU5<br />

• Capacity‐building: GMP and IYCF counseling, planning and budgeting<br />

• Immunization support (logistics)<br />

• Malaria prevention<br />

• Development of IEC materials<br />

• Monitoring and evaluation<br />

• Supply (scales, bednets, boards, drugs)<br />

• Support to the establishment of a<br />

revolving‐fund to ensure sustainable drug<br />

supply<br />

Meeting with communities on how to address undernutrition<br />

(based on results and UNICEF framework)<br />

Bongoville: 22%; Jolisoir: 24%<br />

Introduction to the PD approach in 2 neighborhoods


PD process (1)<br />

• Training of health personnel on PD (9 health center<br />

staff and 3 community health agents)<br />

• Creation of a health village committee (including<br />

criteria for selection of members, definition of the<br />

job description, recruitment of the 5<br />

members/committee)<br />

• Orientation and training of health committees<br />

members on PD (2)<br />

• Preparation of PD survey<br />

• Review of secondary data on health and<br />

nutrition<br />

• Development and pre‐test of tools such as<br />

observation grids and questionnaire<br />

• Mapping of communities (e.g. type of houses,<br />

infrastructures, access, location of U5 and PW,<br />

etc.)<br />

• Wealth ranking of households, calendars of<br />

food availability, market survey


PD process (2)<br />

• Implementation of the PD survey:<br />

• Identification of health resources in the communities (healer, TBA, retired health<br />

staff, vendors)<br />

• Interviews and observations amongst 10 HHs at meal time during the evening (same<br />

socioeco characteristics but with U5 well and undernourished based on underweight<br />

results) per neighborhood (see grid)<br />

• Data analysis to identify good and poor behaviors<br />

• Good behaviors: exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life, encouragements to<br />

the child to eat at meal time and, bathing young children twice a day<br />

• Poor behaviors: traditional treatment of diarrhoea (‘lavement’), hand washing without<br />

soap before meal, insufficient number of meals (1‐2 on a daily basis) and lack of animal<br />

source of food in child diets<br />

• Meetings with the communities (e.g. leaders, parents) for feedbacks and<br />

implementation of PD<br />

• This includes the selection of two key and “feasible” behaviors to be adopted during PD<br />

period and maintained in the future (hand‐washing of child and mother with soap before<br />

giving meal and ensuring 2‐3 meals per day to the child)


PD process (3)<br />

• Design of PD sessions along with mothers, fathers, leaders, health committees<br />

– Agreement on number of foyers based on results on undernutrition (Bongoville: 40,<br />

Jolisoir: 23 children with weight‐for‐age < ‐2 z‐scores)<br />

– Agreement on criteria of success (400 g after 12 days) and criteria for refusal (2 days<br />

of absence, no attendance of mother/father) to the foyers<br />

– Selection of the volunteers mothers (2/foyer, 5 foyers)<br />

– Planning of PD menus with focus on local available food<br />

– Planning of IEC sessions (definition of topics, preparation of materials, see schedule)<br />

– Additional intervention agreed: deworming<br />

– Agreement on contribution of each “stakeholder”:<br />

• Contribution of project to the purchase of cooking pots and utensils (one set per<br />

foyer, kept at the chief place) and contribution to the purchase of meat/chicken<br />

• Contribution of the neighborhood: safe water<br />

• Contribution of health center: dewormers<br />

• Contribution of mothers: provide food such as oil, vegetables, staple food, fruits,<br />

peanut paste, etc.<br />

• Contribution of health committee members:<br />

• Home visit for deworming (day 1) and daily collection of food from the mother<br />

• Mid‐day visit to get the mothers coming on time to PD session<br />

• Organization of PD session (e.g. purchase meat/chicken, ensure that<br />

materials is available on time, complete, clean, hand‐washing, etc.)


PD process: Sessions (1.5 hours)<br />

• Greetings of mothers by health committee members<br />

and health staff<br />

• Weight measurement of children and questions about<br />

illnesses and meals pattern in the past 24 hours<br />

• Installation of the mothers/children<br />

• IEC sessions accompanied by encouragements of<br />

mother to put in practices the two selected healthy<br />

behaviors<br />

• Hand‐washing with soap of children and mothers<br />

• Consumption of meal with help of mothers/fathers<br />

• Hand‐washing with soap and return to home


Results<br />

• On total, 5 PD groups:<br />

– 60 children for the 12‐day period (attendance 95%)<br />

– Bongoville: 76% and Jolisoir: 50% of children gained weight (400 g)<br />

– Cause of “limited” success:<br />

• A child can not eat too much: “if he has eaten well at noon, he does not<br />

need another good meal in the evening”<br />

• Mother availability to prepare food for the evening meal, Jolisoir vs<br />

Bongoville: more HH involvement in agriculture<br />

• No late evening meal: the child was sleeping<br />

– Follow up (monthly GMP)<br />

– Most of them (55) did not lose weight after the PD sessions but maintained<br />

or kept gaining weight<br />

– Promotion of appropriate IYCF (in particular, number and composition of<br />

meals) and hand‐washing with soap


Post PD activities (Bongoville and Jolisoir)<br />

• Health services:<br />

– Monthly monitoring by health center chief of supply and revolving fund to ensure<br />

sustainability (e.g. vaccines, dewormers)<br />

– Unicef continuous support in bednets supply (for PW and newborns)<br />

– GMP at community level and health center/post accompanied by IEC sessions and<br />

counseling to parents on IYCF, distribution of bednet<br />

– Update with MoH on project activities and results (department and provincial levels)<br />

– Support to the establishment of mother groups<br />

• Village chiefs and health committees:<br />

– Support to monthly GMP session at community level and health post, follow up of<br />

children with undernutrition (support to identification of HH challenges, discussion with<br />

families and in particular with the head of HH, encouragements)<br />

– Development of a community micro‐ POA with the objective of improving health/nutrition<br />

of children and mothers (use of other funds)<br />

• Mothers:<br />

– Advocacy to their peers for improvement of feeding practices<br />

– Formation of mother support groups (2) for the promotion of breastfeeding (Pregnant and<br />

breastfeeding mothers)


Lessons learned<br />

• Involvement of parents, local authorities and MoH essential in<br />

all steps of the process<br />

• Knowledge of local context (e.g. populations, customs and<br />

beliefs, etc.) indispensable<br />

• Establishment of a “trust” relationship<br />

• Selection of appropriate “team members” (e.g. trained and<br />

motivated health staff as well as motivated mothers,<br />

motivated health committee members)<br />

• Proper training and follow up<br />

• Dissemination of results at all levels (e.g communities,<br />

department, donors)<br />

• Potential to lead to other types of projects/partnerships


Overall project result<br />

Undernutrition in Bayanga,<br />

% children 0-59 mo (n=496) with score Z ≤ -2, weight/age<br />

May-September 2008<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Mai<br />

Juin<br />

Juillet<br />

Août<br />

Sept<br />

National rural<br />

National urbain<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Beretia Assabisse Mokoko Bomitaba Bongo Ville Jolisoir Bayanga National<br />

2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!