28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.0 Ichthyoplankton<br />

Annual mean abundance <strong>of</strong> fish eggs per station (all three <strong>surveys</strong> combined) is presented in<br />

Table 4.3-4. As noted above, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> eggs was categorized as undeveloped <strong>and</strong><br />

could not be identified to a lower taxonomic level. The highest weighted mean abundance <strong>of</strong><br />

eggs at any station over all survey data was combined was Station LA4 (13,797/100m 2 ),<br />

followed by stations LA10 (12,071/100m 2 ) <strong>and</strong> LB7 (10,217/100m 2 ). Stations LB2<br />

(1,362/100m 2 ) <strong>and</strong> LA3 (1,737/100m 2 ) had the lowest weighted mean abundance <strong>of</strong> eggs.<br />

Abundances <strong>of</strong> the most common taxa at each station varied (Table 4.3-5) For gobies, CIQ<br />

gobies were most abundant at Station LA7 followed by Station LA14, while bay gobies were<br />

most abundant at stations LB4 <strong>and</strong> LA14, <strong>and</strong> yellowfin gobies were most abundant at stations<br />

LA14 <strong>and</strong> LA7. Combtooth blennies were most abundant at stations LB7 <strong>and</strong> LB12, while<br />

clingfish were most abundant at stations LB6 <strong>and</strong> LB12. The abundance <strong>of</strong> clingfish at all other<br />

stations was generally very low.<br />

The three most abundant taxa <strong>of</strong> larvae (CIQ gobies, combtooth blennies <strong>and</strong> bay gobies) were<br />

found at all nineteen stations (Table 4.3-5). It is interesting to note that during the current study,<br />

Station LA3 had the lowest abundance <strong>of</strong> larvae <strong>and</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the lowest abundance <strong>of</strong> fish eggs<br />

compared to the other stations. Station LA3 is geographically c<strong>los</strong>e to LA2, yet during the<br />

current study, LA2 had more than triple the abundance <strong>of</strong> eggs <strong>and</strong> a much higher abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> larval fish. Thus, egg <strong>and</strong> larval densities can differ even at geographically similar station.<br />

Table 4.3-6 presents the weighted mean abundance (#/100 m 2 ) per survey <strong>of</strong> the ten overall<br />

most abundant larval fishes. The total abundance <strong>of</strong> all larvae combined was similar during the<br />

first two <strong>surveys</strong> but much higher during the July survey. This pattern was due to dramatic<br />

increases in the abundance <strong>of</strong> three taxa (CIQ gobies, combtooth blennies, <strong>and</strong> clingfishes)<br />

during the summer (July) survey. Three taxa, yellowfin goby, white croaker, <strong>and</strong> roughcheek<br />

sculpin, were found during the first two <strong>surveys</strong> but not during the third, while northern anchovy<br />

was only found during the last two <strong>surveys</strong>. The differences among <strong>surveys</strong> are due to the<br />

seasonal reproductive patterns <strong>of</strong> these fish a<strong>long</strong> the California coast (Moser 1996).<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis <strong>of</strong> the Bray-Curtis distances among<br />

stations (Figure 4.3-1) show that similarities among the Long Beach Harbor stations are higher<br />

(stations are c<strong>los</strong>er together) than the similarities among Los Angeles Harbor stations, which<br />

are more scattered in the figure. The distances among the LA stations almost mirrors the<br />

physical locations <strong>of</strong> the stations. For example, Stations LA14, LA6, LA05, <strong>and</strong> LA15 at the top<br />

<strong>of</strong> the figure represent an inner harbor grouping <strong>and</strong> the locations <strong>of</strong> Stations LA4, LA3, LA2,<br />

<strong>and</strong> LA1 represent an outer harbor grouping. The relationship <strong>of</strong> the LB stations to their<br />

physical locations is not as clear, which is due to the greater similarity in the larval data among<br />

those stations. PRIMER SIMPER tests confirmed that the average similarity among the Long<br />

Beach Harbor stations (65 %) was greater than the average similarity among the Los Angeles<br />

Harbor stations (52%).<br />

Although the MDS analysis suggests potential relationships <strong>and</strong> similarities among stations<br />

based on larval fish, the differences that were observed could be due to differences in adult fish<br />

composition among sites. The adult fish assemblages, in turn, are dependent to some extent<br />

on the habitats available at each site. Sediment grain size data were used to determine if a<br />

significant relationship exists between sediment grain size <strong>and</strong> larval fish composition. Although<br />

sediment grain size would not be expected to affect larval fish composition directly, it might be<br />

indicative <strong>of</strong> habitat differences that could affect adult fish composition. For example, California<br />

halibut <strong>and</strong> other flatfishes might be more abundant in s<strong>and</strong>y areas with larger grain size than in<br />

areas with higher percentages <strong>of</strong> clay that might support higher numbers <strong>of</strong> gobies that dwell in<br />

burrows in the mud.<br />

<strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors 4–5<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!