28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.0 Birds<br />

Angeles Harbor. The relatively higher percent contribution <strong>of</strong> Western Gulls in recent studies<br />

likely relate to the fact that the <strong>surveys</strong> encompassed both inner <strong>and</strong> outer harbor habitats, both<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are used by the species.<br />

The HEP (1979) study suggested that the increased breeding success <strong>of</strong> Brown Pelicans after<br />

the ban on DDT discharges may have influenced the increase in Brown Pelicans counted in the<br />

harbors between the early <strong>and</strong> late 1970s <strong>surveys</strong>. The number <strong>of</strong> Brown Pelicans has<br />

remained relatively high since then. Although the percent contribution <strong>of</strong> Brown Pelicans to the<br />

total bird counts has been somewhat less in recent <strong>surveys</strong>, that result is attributable to<br />

differences in survey methodology compared to studies conducted in the 1980s. Because<br />

Brown Pelicans mainly occur in the outer harbor, inclusion <strong>of</strong> the inner harbor in the total count<br />

data <strong>of</strong> the 2000–2001 <strong>and</strong> current <strong>surveys</strong> contributes to a dilution <strong>of</strong> the percent contribution<br />

calculation for that species compared to studies that only surveyed the outer harbor.<br />

The percent composition <strong>of</strong> terns (most notably the Elegant Tern) increased in 2000–2001 over<br />

previous <strong>surveys</strong> due to Elegant Tern nesting at Pier 400 (see Section 9.4.2). Elegant Terns<br />

nested once again in <strong>2008</strong> after a two-year hiatus, although their nesting location was different<br />

(see Section 9.4.2). Although nest numbers were similar to those during the 2000–2001<br />

<strong>surveys</strong> (Table 9.4-3), the contribution <strong>of</strong> Elegant Tern decreased from approximately 10% in<br />

2000–2001 to 7% in 2007–<strong>2008</strong> (Table 9.6-1). This small reduction was likely associated with<br />

the slight increase in the total birds counted per survey during the current study.<br />

The percent contribution <strong>of</strong> Br<strong>and</strong>t’s Cormorants has increased over time, including a<br />

substantial increase from approximately 5% in 2000–2001to 14% in 2007–<strong>2008</strong>. This increase<br />

was due to their nesting in Zone 23 at the Long Beach West Basin during the current study.<br />

The percent contribution <strong>of</strong> Double-crested Cormorants is comparable to previous <strong>surveys</strong>.<br />

Surf scoter relative abundance has varied among <strong>surveys</strong>. During the 2000–2001 <strong>surveys</strong>, the<br />

Surf Scoter showed a dramatic decline in percent contribution compared to previous <strong>surveys</strong>,<br />

which MEC (2002) suggested was possibly related to dredging activity in the Ports. During the<br />

2007–<strong>2008</strong> <strong>surveys</strong>, the percent contribution <strong>of</strong> Surf Scoters increased by nearly four-fold, from<br />

3% to 11%, with most individuals observed in Zone 23 (Long Beach West Basin). Because<br />

dredging was ongoing in the West Basin <strong>and</strong> in other outer harbor areas during the 2000–2001<br />

<strong>surveys</strong>, the relatively high abundance <strong>of</strong> Surf Scoters in the current study suggest that any<br />

potential dredging effects were not persistent.<br />

Western Grebes increased from approximately 5% <strong>of</strong> total observations during 1986–1987<br />

<strong>surveys</strong> to 8% during 2000–2001 <strong>and</strong> 2007–<strong>2008</strong> <strong>surveys</strong> (Table 9.6-1), likely due, at least in<br />

part, to the addition <strong>of</strong> inner harbor stations in the recent studies.<br />

Rock Dove accounted for approximately 5% <strong>of</strong> total birds during the 2000–2001 <strong>and</strong> 2007–<strong>2008</strong><br />

<strong>surveys</strong> (Table 9.6-1). Rock doves were most numerous on docks <strong>of</strong> the inner harbor (Table<br />

9.5-2), presumably due to suitable roosting <strong>and</strong> nesting locations under the piers.<br />

<strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors 9–13<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!