28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.0 Eelgrass<br />

sonar imagery <strong>and</strong> marking each location with a weighted buoy for subsequent diver <strong>surveys</strong>.<br />

This transect method provided an accurate representation <strong>of</strong> mean eelgrass turion density<br />

within the delineated eelgrass bed using repeatable methods that documented spatial variations<br />

in turion densities as well as maximum turion densities within the individual eelgrass beds.<br />

Maximum turion densities collected during the <strong>2008</strong> survey were lower than those reported from<br />

the 2000 <strong>surveys</strong> but remained within expected variation based on seasonal differences <strong>and</strong><br />

sampling methods. However, because the present methods also cover the full range <strong>of</strong><br />

densities, the highest turion densities recorded in quadrats sampled in <strong>2008</strong> were consistent<br />

with densities reported in the 2000 baseline study among the surveyed areas (Table 8.3-9).<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> mean turion (shoot) density <strong>and</strong> the associated st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation is to<br />

establish the continuity <strong>and</strong> consistency <strong>of</strong> surveyed eelgrass beds within the Ports. By<br />

examining the relatively low mean shoot densities <strong>and</strong> high st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations reported earlier<br />

in this section, in conjunction with documented visual observations, it is apparent that the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> eelgrass beds delineated in <strong>2008</strong>, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Cabrillo North, are <strong>of</strong> low<br />

density interspersed with higher density patches (Figures 8.3-1 through 8.3-4), <strong>and</strong> that the<br />

plants varied in size <strong>and</strong> spacing. Several areas exemplified dense, well-defined eelgrass beds<br />

while the majority <strong>of</strong> the areas appeared to border on ephemeral or fringe habitat during the<br />

<strong>2008</strong> evaluations.<br />

8.4 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION<br />

8.4.1 Seasonal Eelgrass Dynamics within Los Angeles Harbor<br />

Eelgrass beds or meadows are highly dynamic systems that exist in a constantly changing state<br />

where eelgrass density <strong>and</strong> survival rate is directly affected by numerous environmental factors<br />

(Durance 2002). It is common for the density <strong>and</strong> survival rate <strong>of</strong> eelgrass meadows to fluctuate<br />

on a seasonal basis. Therefore, monitoring <strong>of</strong> eelgrass should consider the natural <strong>and</strong><br />

seasonal variation <strong>of</strong> the eelgrass growth cycles. These dynamic systems can change with the<br />

seasons or remain unchanged for decades (Fonseca et al. 1983).<br />

Eelgrass exhibits seasonality in growth throughout its range depending on the physical <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>biological</strong> factors acting on the individual areas. Eelgrass in the North Pacific, including<br />

southern California, becomes dormant during the winter to a varying degree, depending on<br />

location, leaves, <strong>and</strong> sustaining reserves within its underground rhizome system (Backman<br />

1991). Eelgrass beds at the southern extent <strong>of</strong> their distribution (Sea <strong>of</strong> Cortez) typically die <strong>of</strong>f<br />

during mid-summer <strong>and</strong> are reestablished by recruitment in the fall. Considering the extensive<br />

distribution range <strong>of</strong> eelgrass (Zostera spp.), seasonal declines <strong>and</strong> expansions are variable<br />

based on the environmental conditions experienced within specific geographical locations. In<br />

southern California, including the Ports, the seasonality <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>and</strong> reproduction is less<br />

pronounced <strong>and</strong> eelgrass <strong>of</strong>ten grows year around. For example, flowering may occur during<br />

any month, although it is most pronounced in the spring (Ruckelshaus 1996). The presence<br />

<strong>and</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> eelgrass fluctuates yearly based on localized <strong>and</strong> regional conditions, but early<br />

winter typically marks the end <strong>of</strong> the growth period <strong>and</strong> the initiation <strong>of</strong> die <strong>of</strong>f or senescence <strong>of</strong><br />

eelgrass populations, as associated with lower water temperatures <strong>and</strong> increased turbidity from<br />

storms or run<strong>of</strong>f. During the summer, eelgrass begins vegetative growth, exp<strong>and</strong>ing from<br />

dormant rhizomes <strong>and</strong> increasing in shoot density. Meanwhile, recruitment from seed<br />

production provides potential recolonization or expansion to areas previously devoid <strong>of</strong> eelgrass<br />

or to fringe areas containing marginal habitat conditions. The inconsistency <strong>and</strong> variability <strong>of</strong><br />

winter conditions experienced in southern California <strong>and</strong> the dynamics <strong>of</strong> coastal circulation<br />

determines the level <strong>of</strong> effect that different eelgrass beds or areas experience on a yearly basis.<br />

<strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors 8–11<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!