28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.0 Kelp <strong>and</strong> Macroalgae<br />

(Figure 7.3-1 through 7.3-4). The kelp bed near the entrance to Fish Harbor was moderately<br />

dense, with individual plants spaced approximately 1-2 meters apart. The surface canopy near<br />

the Fish Harbor kelp bed <strong>and</strong> adjacent to the Federal Penitentiary (the rectangular peninsula<br />

southwest <strong>of</strong> Fish Harbor) extended up to 30 meters away from the riprap in some places; M.<br />

pyrifera in these locations appeared to be mostly perennial adults.<br />

The macroalga Egregia menziesii occurred most commonly near the terminus <strong>of</strong> the outer<br />

breakwater <strong>and</strong> a<strong>long</strong> the western portions <strong>of</strong> the breakwall near Cabrillo Beach <strong>and</strong> the<br />

entrance to the Port <strong>of</strong> Long Beach (Figure 7.3-1 <strong>and</strong> 7.3-2). Sargassum muticum, a non native<br />

species (Abbott <strong>and</strong> Hollenberg 1976) was intermittently observed under piers <strong>and</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> low<br />

wave exposure during vessel <strong>surveys</strong>. No spatial data for S. muticum was established because<br />

occurrences <strong>of</strong> this species was limited to very small areas <strong>and</strong> typically occurred in conjunction<br />

with the other dominant surface canopy species.<br />

Sedimentation <strong>and</strong> scour are highly detrimental to kelp plants (Dayton 1985). On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, water movement is essential to kelp: motion resulting from tidal cycles, internal waves,<br />

<strong>and</strong> a<strong>long</strong>shore currents replenishes dissolved nutrients within kelp beds <strong>and</strong> removes waste<br />

products (North 1994). Kelp <strong>and</strong> macroalgae communities near the harbor entrances (outer<br />

harbor) likely benefit from increased water clarity, lower water temperatures, <strong>and</strong> less turbidity<br />

than stations farther into the harbors (inner stations) with lower water clarity <strong>and</strong> higher turbidity.<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> proximity to the harbor entrance <strong>and</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> extensive hard<br />

substratum likely explains the abundance <strong>of</strong> kelp <strong>and</strong> macroalgae associated with the Cabrillo<br />

Shallow Water Habitat (CSWH; Figures 7.3-1 <strong>and</strong> 7.3-3).<br />

7.3.2 Temporal Variability<br />

Global distribution <strong>of</strong> kelp forests is<br />

physiologically constrained by light at high<br />

latitudes <strong>and</strong> by nutrients, warm<br />

temperatures, <strong>and</strong> other macrophytes at low<br />

latitudes (Steneck et al. 2002). Other<br />

important environmental factors influencing<br />

kelp communities include available substrata,<br />

sedimentation, water motion, <strong>and</strong> salinity.<br />

(Dayton 1985). Temporal unpredictability,<br />

especially episodic recruitment events,<br />

should be considered characteristic <strong>of</strong> kelp<br />

(Dayton <strong>and</strong> Tegner 1984). Annual<br />

variations in surface kelp canopy coverage<br />

area <strong>and</strong> density have important implications<br />

to the associated community within kelp<br />

beds.<br />

Temporal variability <strong>of</strong> surface kelp canopy was evident within the Ports during the <strong>2008</strong> spring<br />

<strong>and</strong> fall sampling events, similar to those noted during the 2000 baseline sampling. During the<br />

<strong>2008</strong> spring <strong>surveys</strong>, total surface canopy cover <strong>of</strong> M. pyrifera <strong>and</strong> E. menziesii was 77.8 acres<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2.33 acres, respectively (Figures 7.3-1 <strong>and</strong> 7.3-2). By fall, the cover <strong>of</strong> M. pyrifera had<br />

declined markedly, to 50.41 acres <strong>and</strong> E. menziesii decreased to approximately 2.12 acres<br />

(Figures 7.3-3 <strong>and</strong> 7.3-4). In addition to declines in the extent <strong>of</strong> canopy coverage, the density<br />

<strong>of</strong> the kelp beds declined between spring <strong>and</strong> fall (Table 7.3-1).<br />

Variations in the M. pyrifera surface canopy were especially dramatic between the spring <strong>and</strong><br />

fall <strong>2008</strong> <strong>surveys</strong> throughout the CSWH: linear subtidal rock dikes installed to stabilize the s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

7–4 <strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!