28.05.2014 Views

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

appendix b final 2008 biological surveys of los angeles and long ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.0 Benthic <strong>and</strong> Epibenthic Invertebrates<br />

5.2.3 Data Analysis<br />

Infauna data were entered into a database from the taxonomic laboratory sheets.<br />

Macroinvertebrate data were coded from the field data sheets <strong>and</strong> entered into a separate<br />

database. Data were subjected to quality assurance review.<br />

Infaunal data from box core <strong>and</strong> Van Veen samples were st<strong>and</strong>ardized to number per 0.1 m 2 for<br />

comparison with each other <strong>and</strong> historical data. Abundance <strong>and</strong> biomass <strong>of</strong> the trawl collected<br />

invertebrates is presented as catch per unit effort (CPUE), which represents the number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals captured st<strong>and</strong>ardized to the amount <strong>of</strong> the effort (total time or area sampled)<br />

exerted. Averages were calculated for each station across <strong>surveys</strong> <strong>and</strong> for the total mean for all<br />

stations <strong>and</strong> <strong>surveys</strong> combined.<br />

Diversity was calculated with three different indices, which are derived measures based upon<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> species (species richness) <strong>and</strong> their abundances (equitability). The Shannon-<br />

Wiener diversity index tends to emphasize the equitability <strong>of</strong> the species distribution in a<br />

community. The Margalex Index incorporates the number <strong>of</strong> species <strong>and</strong> total number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals. The Dominance Index computes the number <strong>of</strong> species that account for 75% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total abundance.<br />

Cluster analysis was performed for the infauna data for both the winter <strong>and</strong> summer <strong>surveys</strong>.<br />

This analysis was used to identify groups <strong>of</strong> stations that were <strong>biological</strong>ly similar. Species<br />

composition <strong>and</strong> relative abundance <strong>of</strong> the species defined the groups. Rare species (i.e.,<br />

occurring at fewer than three stations) were excluded from the analysis. Figures <strong>of</strong> station <strong>and</strong><br />

species dendrograms were prepared from the cluster analysis.<br />

5.3 INFAUNA<br />

This section presents discussions <strong>of</strong> community summary measures (Section 5.3.1), a detailed<br />

description <strong>and</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> species composition (Section 5.3.2) <strong>and</strong> dominant species<br />

(Section 5.3.3), summary <strong>of</strong> spatial <strong>and</strong> temporal patterns (Section 5.3.4), <strong>and</strong> a comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>2008</strong> Biological Survey results with historical studies (Section 5.3.5). The box core <strong>and</strong> Van<br />

Veen comparison is discussed in Section 5.3.6. Raw summary data <strong>and</strong> a complete listing <strong>of</strong><br />

abundance by species <strong>and</strong> stations <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> biomass data are provided in Appendix E.<br />

5.3.1 Community Summary Measures<br />

5.3.1.1 Abundance<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 10,772 infaunal invertebrates weighing 704 grams <strong>and</strong> comprising 258 species was<br />

collected across the 29 stations (Table 5.3-1). Total infaunal abundance was nearly double<br />

during the summer (7,017) compared to winter (3,755) <strong>surveys</strong>.<br />

Mean abundances ranged from 80 to 488 individuals/0.1 m 2 (Table 5.3-1). Abundance varied<br />

with depth <strong>and</strong> location in the harbors. Abundances were similar between the inner harbor<br />

stations (80-488 individuals/0.1 m 2 ) <strong>and</strong> outer harbor stations (93-413 individuals/0.1 m 2 ), but<br />

were markedly higher in shallow water (126-488 individuals/0.1 m 2 ) than in deep water (80-289<br />

individuals/0.1 m 2 ).<br />

In the outer harbor, mean abundance in shallow water was nearly two times higher (mean <strong>of</strong><br />

249 individuals/0.1 m 2 ) compared to deep water (mean <strong>of</strong> 142 individuals/0.1 m 2 , Table 5.3-1).<br />

In the inner harbor, mean abundance at the shallow water station (488 individuals/0.1 m 2 ) was<br />

approximately 3 times greater than at deepwater stations (173 individuals/0.1 m 2 ).<br />

The highest mean abundances (mean > 400 individuals/0.1 m 2 ) were found at the Pier 300<br />

Shallow Water Habitat <strong>and</strong> Consolidated Slip <strong>of</strong> inner Los Angeles Harbor (Stations LA7 <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> Biological Surveys <strong>of</strong> Los Angeles <strong>and</strong> Long Beach Harbors 5–3<br />

April 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!