28.05.2014 Views

CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...

CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...

CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9<br />

No. of Grants per Year<br />

No. of Grants<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

BRE<br />

BSE<br />

CEE<br />

LSGI<br />

FCE Total<br />

0<br />

03/04<br />

04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13<br />

Year<br />

Figure 2: Comparison of Number of Grants per Year between Departments<br />

<br />

Within the broad field of construction and environment, we still<br />

lead all other local universities by a big margin in the GRF/ECS<br />

exercises. In the Civil Engineering, Surveying, Building and<br />

Construction (CESBC) disciplines of the Engineering Panel,<br />

PolyU has ranked number 1 over the past 18 rounds in terms of<br />

both the number of GRF/ECS projects supported and the total<br />

grant value won, receiving constantly around or over 40% of all<br />

GRF/ECS grants allocated in these disciplines. Of the 29 GRF/<br />

ECS grants awarded to the Faculty this year, 4 were awarded<br />

outside the CESBC disciplines. As a result, the Faculty won 25<br />

grants (or 37%) totalling HK$15,674K out of the 67 GRF/ECS<br />

grants awarded by RGC in the CESBC disciplines in the present<br />

(i.e. 2012/2013) round; by contrast, the Faculty won 19 grants (or<br />

41%) totalling HK$15,075K out of the 46 GRF grants awarded<br />

in the CESBC disciplines in the 2011/12 round. Although the<br />

number of GRF/ECS grants and the total amount of funding<br />

awarded to the Faculty has increased this year by 32% and 4%<br />

respectively, it is important to note that our share of grants in<br />

the CESBC disciplines has fallen below 40% this year for the<br />

first time since 2004/2005. <strong>The</strong> large increase in the number<br />

of grants reflects mainly the adjusted position of RGCs<br />

Engineering Panel to support more projects but at lower levels<br />

of funding compared to the last few years. <strong>The</strong> distribution of<br />

the amount of GRF/ECS funding in the 2012/13 round among<br />

different universities is shown in Figure 3. Although our grant<br />

share in the CESBC disciplines depends to some extent on<br />

how applicants align their applications with disciplines and on<br />

the development of new academic units in these disciplines at<br />

sister institutions, it is desirable that we work hard to ensure<br />

a minimum share of 40% of GRF/ECS funding in the CESBC<br />

disciplines in the future.<br />

GRF/ECS<br />

(CESBC) <br />

GRF/ECS <br />

<br />

2012/13 <br />

GRF/ECS <br />

<br />

37%<br />

2011/12 GRF <br />

( ) 41%<br />

GRF/ECS 32% 4%<br />

2004/2005 <br />

<br />

<br />

2012/13 GRF/ECS <br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

GRF/ECS <br />

Ref: http://www.ugc.edu.hk/big5/doc/rgc/result/grf/inst_12proj_<br />

c.pdf<br />

Share of Total Grant Awarded (%) 2012/13<br />

UST (26.5)<br />

HKU (16)<br />

City U (17.6)<br />

PolyU (38.2)<br />

CUHK (1.6)<br />

CityU<br />

CUHK<br />

PolyU<br />

UST<br />

HKU<br />

Figure 3: Distribution of GRF/ECS Funding in the CESBC disciplines among<br />

institutions in the 2012/13 round.<br />

2012/13 (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!