CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...
CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...
CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT - The Hong Kong Polytechnic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9<br />
No. of Grants per Year<br />
No. of Grants<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
BRE<br />
BSE<br />
CEE<br />
LSGI<br />
FCE Total<br />
0<br />
03/04<br />
04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13<br />
Year<br />
Figure 2: Comparison of Number of Grants per Year between Departments<br />
<br />
Within the broad field of construction and environment, we still<br />
lead all other local universities by a big margin in the GRF/ECS<br />
exercises. In the Civil Engineering, Surveying, Building and<br />
Construction (CESBC) disciplines of the Engineering Panel,<br />
PolyU has ranked number 1 over the past 18 rounds in terms of<br />
both the number of GRF/ECS projects supported and the total<br />
grant value won, receiving constantly around or over 40% of all<br />
GRF/ECS grants allocated in these disciplines. Of the 29 GRF/<br />
ECS grants awarded to the Faculty this year, 4 were awarded<br />
outside the CESBC disciplines. As a result, the Faculty won 25<br />
grants (or 37%) totalling HK$15,674K out of the 67 GRF/ECS<br />
grants awarded by RGC in the CESBC disciplines in the present<br />
(i.e. 2012/2013) round; by contrast, the Faculty won 19 grants (or<br />
41%) totalling HK$15,075K out of the 46 GRF grants awarded<br />
in the CESBC disciplines in the 2011/12 round. Although the<br />
number of GRF/ECS grants and the total amount of funding<br />
awarded to the Faculty has increased this year by 32% and 4%<br />
respectively, it is important to note that our share of grants in<br />
the CESBC disciplines has fallen below 40% this year for the<br />
first time since 2004/2005. <strong>The</strong> large increase in the number<br />
of grants reflects mainly the adjusted position of RGCs<br />
Engineering Panel to support more projects but at lower levels<br />
of funding compared to the last few years. <strong>The</strong> distribution of<br />
the amount of GRF/ECS funding in the 2012/13 round among<br />
different universities is shown in Figure 3. Although our grant<br />
share in the CESBC disciplines depends to some extent on<br />
how applicants align their applications with disciplines and on<br />
the development of new academic units in these disciplines at<br />
sister institutions, it is desirable that we work hard to ensure<br />
a minimum share of 40% of GRF/ECS funding in the CESBC<br />
disciplines in the future.<br />
GRF/ECS<br />
(CESBC) <br />
GRF/ECS <br />
<br />
2012/13 <br />
GRF/ECS <br />
<br />
37%<br />
2011/12 GRF <br />
( ) 41%<br />
GRF/ECS 32% 4%<br />
2004/2005 <br />
<br />
<br />
2012/13 GRF/ECS <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
GRF/ECS <br />
Ref: http://www.ugc.edu.hk/big5/doc/rgc/result/grf/inst_12proj_<br />
c.pdf<br />
Share of Total Grant Awarded (%) 2012/13<br />
UST (26.5)<br />
HKU (16)<br />
City U (17.6)<br />
PolyU (38.2)<br />
CUHK (1.6)<br />
CityU<br />
CUHK<br />
PolyU<br />
UST<br />
HKU<br />
Figure 3: Distribution of GRF/ECS Funding in the CESBC disciplines among<br />
institutions in the 2012/13 round.<br />
2012/13 (