28.05.2014 Views

NO.7 • DECEMBER 2008 - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

NO.7 • DECEMBER 2008 - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

NO.7 • DECEMBER 2008 - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Technology Transfer and Research Developments<br />

技 術 轉 移 與 科 技 發 展<br />

Nondestructive Evaluation Methods as Evaluation Tools of the Quality<br />

of Reinforced Concrete Structures<br />

無 損 檢 測 方 法 可 診 斷 鋼 筋 混 凝 土 結 構 的 質 量<br />

<strong>The</strong> ability of a civil engineering and building structure to withstand<br />

earthquake is dependent on its structural design and quality control during<br />

construction. After the Sichuan earthquake, sub-standard constructions have<br />

been accused as a major cause of a large number of structural collapses,<br />

especially to schools which led to huge numbers of casualties. <strong>The</strong> alleged<br />

sub-standard constructions included (1) deficiency in steel reinforcement<br />

inside the concrete structures, and (2) poor concrete quality. <strong>The</strong>re may be<br />

a need to scientifically examine the quality of the building structures after the<br />

buildings have been completed. Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods<br />

can be used to visualizethe internal conditions and assess the quality<br />

of large-scale reinforced concrete structures without damaging the already<br />

built structures. Amongst the many NDE methods being used in the civil<br />

engineering discipline, ground penetrating radar (GPR) and ultrasound pulse<br />

velocity (UPV) are the two most effective methods in the case of Sichuan.<br />

basic GPR system costs less than US$50,000; while a basic UPV system<br />

costs about US$5,000; (5) user friendly: 1-2 day training is adequate for<br />

personnel with a civil engineering background, and (6) portable: typically,<br />

these systems weigh about a few kilograms which makes mobilization and<br />

handling very convenient.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

12<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Figures 1<br />

GPR reveals the arrangement<br />

of steel reinforcements<br />

embedded in a concrete wall.<br />

<br />

<br />

Figures 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> UPV set up<br />

<br />

GPR transmits high-frequency electromagnetic (EM) wave into the internal<br />

concrete structure via a small transmitting antenna placed on the concrete<br />

surface. Anomalies (such as steel reinforcement) embedded in the reinforced<br />

concrete reflect the EM wave back to the receiving antenna differently from<br />

that of the surrounding concrete matrix. Using a portable computer, the<br />

measured EM signal can be used to quantify the number and spacing of<br />

steel reinforcement present in the concrete in real-time. Figure 1 shows the<br />

typical results of such measurements of a reinforced concrete wall. We can<br />

clearly seethe internal distribution and alignment of the steel reinforcements<br />

(including quantity, spacing and depth) embedded 25mm beneath the<br />

concrete surface.<br />

<strong>The</strong> working principle (transmission and reflection) of UPV (Figure 2) is<br />

somehow similar to that of GPR, except that its transmission is by sound<br />

wave. Transmission of ultrasound in a material is highly correlated with its<br />

density, which is a determining factor of the compressive strength of concrete.<br />

Hence, this correlation may be used as a rough indicator of the quality of the<br />

examined concrete. In general, a concrete with a UPV higher than 3500m/<br />

s may be regarded as a good concrete.<br />

<strong>The</strong> advantages of the above two NDE methods are: (1) reasonably<br />

accurate; (2) totally nondestructive to the structure; (3) results are obtained<br />

real-time and on-site during the evaluation such that sample collection and<br />

associated laboratory tests are not required, typically, a general inspection<br />

of a 3-storey building takes about 2 days; (4) relatively inexpensive: a<br />

<br />

()<br />

<br />

<br />

( )25<br />

(,)<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

3,500<br />

<br />

()()()<br />

<br />

()<br />

5<br />

5,000<br />

()<br />

<br />

()<br />

<br />

Professor C.S. Poon<br />

潘 智 生 教 授<br />

Email<br />

cecspoon@polyu.edu.hk<br />

Department of Civil and<br />

Structural Engineering<br />

<br />

08

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!