Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Essential Performance Criteria (EPC) 2a. Communicating with Students Performance Rating Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement or Developing Effective Highly Effective EPC Domain 2: Instructional Delivery and Facilitation Little or no evidence exists that the teacher communicates with students at key points throughout the lesson. Instructional practices reflect a lack of developing students’ understanding of the lesson by rarely communicating what students will know or be able to do. Partial evidence exists that the teacher communicates with students at key points throughout the lesson. Instructional practices reflect an insufficient level of developing students’ understanding of the lesson by inconsistently communicating what students will know or be able to do. The teacher may infrequently refer to the lesson essential question to check for student understanding during the lesson. Adequate evidence exists that the teacher communicates with students at key points throughout the lesson. Instructional practices reflect intentional development of students’ understanding of the lesson by consistently communicating what students will know or be able to do and referring to the lesson essential question to check for student understanding at key points throughout each lesson. Significant and varied evidence exists that the teacher’s communication with students is interwoven throughout the entire lesson. Instructional practices reflect extensive development of students’ understanding of each lesson by seamlessly communicating what students will know or be able to do, connecting each lesson essential question to prior knowledge, conveying the relevance, and referring to the lesson essential question to check for student understanding at key points throughout each lesson. Florida Educator Accomplished Practices: The Learning Environment Instructional Delivery and Facilitation Possible evidence may include sources such as: Observation, Written Communication Artifacts, Administrator Conversation, Oral Communication, Student Work Samples, Lesson Plans, and Graphic Organizers. 73
Essential Performance Criteria (EPC) 2b. Using Strategies to Evoke High‐order Thinking and Discussions Performance Rating Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement or Developing Effective Highly Effective EPC Domain 2: Instructional Delivery and Facilitation Little or no evidence exists that the teacher uses strategies to evoke higher order thinking and discussions. Partial evidence exists that the teacher uses strategies to evoke higher order thinking and discussions. Adequate evidence exists that the teacher uses strategies to evoke higher order thinking and discussions. Significant evidence exists that the teacher uses varied strategies to evoke higher order thinking and discussions. Scaffolding, pacing, prompting, and probing techniques are not used when asking students questions. Students are not provided opportunities to participate in learning activities which require them to show, tell, explain, and prove their reasoning. Questions are low order and/or posed in rapid succession. Scaffolding, pacing, prompting, and probing techniques are inconsistently used when asking students questions. Students are occasionally provided opportunities to participate in learning activities which require them to show, tell, explain, and prove their reasoning. Many questions are low order and/or posed in rapid succession. Scaffolding, pacing, prompting, and probing techniques are intentionally used when asking students questions. Students are often provided opportunities to participate in learning activities which require them to show, tell, explain, and prove their reasoning. Questions elicit thoughtful responses and wait time is utilized for students to answer. Scaffolding, pacing, prompting, and probing techniques are consistently used when asking students questions. Students are provided extensive opportunities to participate in learning activities which require them to show, tell, explain, and prove their reasoning. Questions elicit thoughtful responses and sufficient wait time is utilized for students to reflect and answer. Florida Educator Accomplished Practices: Instructional Delivery and Facilitation Possible evidence may include sources such as: Observation, Conversation, Extending Thinking Lessons, Wait Time, Student Engagement, Verbatim Questions. 74
Page 1 and 2:
2012 Teacher Evaluation System Polk
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Page PCPS Mission
Page 5 and 6:
Core Values ‐ Polk County Public
Page 7 and 8:
Dear Teacher, As you review this ne
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction It is important to rec
Page 11 and 12:
Teacher Evaluation Philosophy The p
Page 13 and 14:
FCAT/State Assessment Teachers (Not
Page 15 and 16:
point value for the teacher for thi
Page 17 and 18:
Planned Use of Student Performance
Page 19 and 20:
2012‐2013: Use of Student Assessm
Page 21 and 22:
Category I: Significant Evaluation
Page 23 and 24:
Category II: Significant Evaluation
Page 25 and 26: Classroom Teacher Observation Proce
Page 27 and 28: Observation Implementation Practice
Page 29 and 30: EPC f. Integrating cross content re
Page 31 and 32: Requirements for Consistency in Eva
Page 33 and 34: Alignment and Support of District a
Page 35 and 36: As an element in Polk County’s co
Page 37 and 38: Processes for Informing Teachers ab
Page 39 and 40: with the teacher in a conference to
Page 41 and 42: adjustments in system processes tha
Page 43 and 44: Section 1. This act may be cited as
Page 45 and 46: for measuring student learning grow
Page 47 and 48: hearing. The hearing shall be condu
Page 49 and 50: the identity of students for whom t
Page 51 and 52: under s. 1012.34 and shall provide
Page 53 and 54: district school board and have rece
Page 55 and 56: ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 necessary
Page 57 and 58: 2. The member must have completed 3
Page 59 and 60: Section 17. Chapter 2010‐279, Law
Page 61 and 62: deficiencies within a reasonable, p
Page 63 and 64: e. Models clear, acceptable oral an
Page 65 and 66: TARGET and ARROW Forms Appendix C T
Page 67 and 68: ARROW for School-Based Professional
Page 69 and 70: Appendix D POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEAC
Page 71 and 72: Essential Performance Criteria (EPC
Page 75: Essential Performance Criteria (EPC
Page 93 and 94: Situational Context Factors In orde
Page 95 and 96: Global Observation Feedback Form Te
Page 97 and 98: Teacher’s Overall Annual Performa
Page 99 and 100: Polk County School District Instruc
Page 101 and 102: Professional Development Plan Cross
Page 103 and 104: Glossary Appendix G Alternative Cer
Page 105 and 106: Highly Effective - a rating that in
Page 107 and 108: The adopted Florida Teacher Evaluat
Page 109 and 110: Teacher Evaluation Planning Session
Page 111 and 112: organization. (c.) Shall not interf
Page 113: Documentation of Collective Bargain
show all

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?