Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(Pending Completion of Collective Bargaining Processes and School Board Approval) Polk County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System 2011‐1012 Conditional Approval by Florida Department of Education 6/24/2011 “Enhancing Student Achievement through Teacher Evaluation and Learning” Sherrie Nickell, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS District 1 ‐ Frank O'Reilly District 2 ‐ Lori Cunningham District 3 ‐ Hazel Sellers District 4 ‐ Dick Mullenax District 5 ‐ Kay Fields District 6 ‐ Debra Wright District 7 ‐ Tim Harris David Lewis, Associate Superintendent, Learning Cheryl Joe, Director, Professional Development Conditional FLDOE Approval June 2011 Revised September 2011 Revised February 2012
Table of Contents Page PCPS Mission Statement 1 PCPS Core Values 2 Superintendent’s Introduction Letter 3 Polk Education Association’s Welcome Letter 4 Acknowledgement 5 Introduction 6 Preface 7 Teacher Evaluation Philosophy 8 Conceptual Framework 9 FCAT/State Assessment Teachers 10 Non‐FCAT A Teachers 11 Non‐FCAT B Teachers 12 System Highlights: Differentiated Evaluation Processes Table 13 Overview of Planned Use of Student Assessment Data 14 2011 – 2012: Planned Use of State Assessment Data 14 District Commitment to Use State Student Growth Model 14 2011 – 2012 Application of Student Performance Data 15 2012 – 2013: Planned Use of Student Assessment Data 16 2013 – 2014: Planned Use of Student Assessment Data 16 Uncommon Teacher Scenarios: Planned Application of Student Assessment Data 17 Category I: Significant Evaluation Processes for Teachers 18 Category II: Significant Evaluation Processes for Teachers 20 Classroom Teacher Observation Processes 22 Observation Practices, Instruments, and Rating Calculations 24 Observable Essential Performance Criteria and Observation Instruments 25 Teacher Self‐Evaluation Process 27 Requirements for Consistency in Evaluator Rating Processes 28 Importance of Feedback to Improving Performance 28 Mechanisms for Parental Input 29 Alignment and Support of District and School Improvement Plans 30 Continuous Professional Improvement 31 Processes and Components Included in Evaluator Professional Learning 33 Processes for Informing Teachers about the Teacher Evaluation System 34 Evaluator and Teacher Professional Learning Components and Timeline 34 Use of Contemporary Research 35 Evaluation Rating Criteria Variables 35 Multiple Evaluations for First Year Teachers (New to the Profession or District) 36 Support for District and School Improvement Plans 36 Teaching Fields Requiring Special Procedures 37 Annual Review of the Teacher Evaluation System 37 Peer Review Option 38 Evaluation By Supervisor 38 Input into Evaluation by Other Trained Personnel 38 Timeline for Development/Implementation of Student Assessments 38 Appendix A: Legal Basis – Student Success Act 2011 and PCPS Evaluation Policy 3.004 39 Appendix B: Florida Educator Accomplished Practices 59 Appendix C: TARGET Plan (IPDP) and ARROW Documentation Forms 62 Appendix D: EPC Rating Rubrics 66 Appendix E: Classroom Teacher Evaluation System Forms 91 Appendix F: Timeline for Development/Implementation and Implementation of Student Assessments 99 Appendix G: Glossary 100 Appendix H: Code of Ethics (State Board Rule 6B‐1.006 FAC) 107 Appendix I: Evidence of Collective Bargaining 110
Page 1: 2012 Teacher Evaluation System Polk
Page 5 and 6: Core Values ‐ Polk County Public
Page 7 and 8: Dear Teacher, As you review this ne
Page 9 and 10: Introduction It is important to rec
Page 11 and 12: Teacher Evaluation Philosophy The p
Page 13 and 14: FCAT/State Assessment Teachers (Not
Page 15 and 16: point value for the teacher for thi
Page 17 and 18: Planned Use of Student Performance
Page 19 and 20: 2012‐2013: Use of Student Assessm
Page 21 and 22: Category I: Significant Evaluation
Page 23 and 24: Category II: Significant Evaluation
Page 25 and 26: Classroom Teacher Observation Proce
Page 27 and 28: Observation Implementation Practice
Page 29 and 30: EPC f. Integrating cross content re
Page 31 and 32: Requirements for Consistency in Eva
Page 33 and 34: Alignment and Support of District a
Page 35 and 36: As an element in Polk County’s co
Page 37 and 38: Processes for Informing Teachers ab
Page 39 and 40: with the teacher in a conference to
Page 41 and 42: adjustments in system processes tha
Page 43 and 44: Section 1. This act may be cited as
Page 45 and 46: for measuring student learning grow
Page 47 and 48: hearing. The hearing shall be condu
Page 49 and 50: the identity of students for whom t
Page 51 and 52: under s. 1012.34 and shall provide
Page 53 and 54:
district school board and have rece
Page 55 and 56:
ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 necessary
Page 57 and 58:
2. The member must have completed 3
Page 59 and 60:
Section 17. Chapter 2010‐279, Law
Page 61 and 62:
deficiencies within a reasonable, p
Page 63 and 64:
e. Models clear, acceptable oral an
Page 65 and 66:
TARGET and ARROW Forms Appendix C T
Page 67 and 68:
ARROW for School-Based Professional
Page 69 and 70:
Appendix D POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEAC
Page 71 and 72:
Essential Performance Criteria (EPC
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Situational Context Factors In orde
Page 95 and 96:
Global Observation Feedback Form Te
Page 97 and 98:
Teacher’s Overall Annual Performa
Page 99 and 100:
Polk County School District Instruc
Page 101 and 102:
Professional Development Plan Cross
Page 103 and 104:
Glossary Appendix G Alternative Cer
Page 105 and 106:
Highly Effective - a rating that in
Page 107 and 108:
The adopted Florida Teacher Evaluat
Page 109 and 110:
Teacher Evaluation Planning Session
Page 111 and 112:
organization. (c.) Shall not interf
Page 113:
Documentation of Collective Bargain
show all

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?