Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District
Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District
Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
All Non‐FCAT <strong>Teacher</strong>s‐ Type A<br />
(Not Applicable 2011 – 2012)<br />
A Non‐FCAT A teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating is based on “Points Earned”<br />
related to the following components:<br />
The following procedures will be applied for Non‐FCAT A teachers whose students participate in state<br />
assessment processes and for whom no district processes have been developed and implemented:<br />
1a. Student performance data focused on learning gains in Reading or Math as most<br />
appropriate to subject taught and as derived from state assessment processes based on three<br />
years of “trend data” from 2012‐2013, 2013‐2014 and 2014‐2015 as available will be applied for<br />
use in the teacher evaluation process.<br />
The following procedures will be applied for Non‐FCAT A teachers whose students do not participate<br />
in state assessment processes and for whom no district assessment processes have been developed<br />
and implemented:<br />
1b. The teacher will develop learning gain goals for the students that the teacher is teaching as<br />
a part of the TARGET (IPDP) planning process. Learning gains related to these goals will be<br />
determined through teacher‐made pre‐/post‐assessments directly tied to state content<br />
standards and district curriculum maps. For the 2012‐2013 school year and for additional years<br />
in which district assessments have not been developed, in order to ensure student assessment<br />
data availability and processing before the teacher is evaluated, pre‐/post‐assessment content<br />
will address only content learned through the last day of the third nine‐weeks grading period.<br />
<strong>Teacher</strong>‐made pre‐assessments must be administered by the 45 th student contact day and the<br />
post‐assessments must be administered no later than the 140 th day of student contact.<br />
This variable determines 50.3% of the teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating.<br />
<strong>Teacher</strong>s are awarded points individually. A point values table related to learning gains derived from<br />
using data from state assessment processes and/or teacher‐made student assessments pertaining to<br />
the students that the teacher teaches has been developed and applied starting August 15, 2011.<br />
Demonstration of evidence‐based teaching practices and behaviors directly linked to the Florida<br />
Educator Accomplished Practices are rated by the school administrator and combined with the<br />
teacher’s situational context points as determined by specified student demographic impact factors<br />
related to teaching in a classroom heavily impacted by these factors. <strong>Teacher</strong>s are rated and awarded<br />
points individually and make up 48% of a teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating.<br />
A Self‐<strong>Evaluation</strong> process pertaining to the evidence‐based teaching practices and behaviors directly<br />
linked to the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices is completed by the classroom teacher. Each<br />
teacher analyzes the EPCs and related rubrics. After reflecting on his/her practices as delineated in the<br />
rubric descriptions, the teacher rates him/herself accordingly for each EPC. The rubric points are<br />
totaled. The Self‐<strong>Evaluation</strong> Table on page 27 identifies ranges of point totals determining the total<br />
11