27.05.2014 Views

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

All Non‐FCAT <strong>Teacher</strong>s‐ Type A<br />

(Not Applicable 2011 – 2012)<br />

A Non‐FCAT A teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating is based on “Points Earned”<br />

related to the following components:<br />

The following procedures will be applied for Non‐FCAT A teachers whose students participate in state<br />

assessment processes and for whom no district processes have been developed and implemented:<br />

1a. Student performance data focused on learning gains in Reading or Math as most<br />

appropriate to subject taught and as derived from state assessment processes based on three<br />

years of “trend data” from 2012‐2013, 2013‐2014 and 2014‐2015 as available will be applied for<br />

use in the teacher evaluation process.<br />

The following procedures will be applied for Non‐FCAT A teachers whose students do not participate<br />

in state assessment processes and for whom no district assessment processes have been developed<br />

and implemented:<br />

1b. The teacher will develop learning gain goals for the students that the teacher is teaching as<br />

a part of the TARGET (IPDP) planning process. Learning gains related to these goals will be<br />

determined through teacher‐made pre‐/post‐assessments directly tied to state content<br />

standards and district curriculum maps. For the 2012‐2013 school year and for additional years<br />

in which district assessments have not been developed, in order to ensure student assessment<br />

data availability and processing before the teacher is evaluated, pre‐/post‐assessment content<br />

will address only content learned through the last day of the third nine‐weeks grading period.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>‐made pre‐assessments must be administered by the 45 th student contact day and the<br />

post‐assessments must be administered no later than the 140 th day of student contact.<br />

This variable determines 50.3% of the teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating.<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong>s are awarded points individually. A point values table related to learning gains derived from<br />

using data from state assessment processes and/or teacher‐made student assessments pertaining to<br />

the students that the teacher teaches has been developed and applied starting August 15, 2011.<br />

Demonstration of evidence‐based teaching practices and behaviors directly linked to the Florida<br />

Educator Accomplished Practices are rated by the school administrator and combined with the<br />

teacher’s situational context points as determined by specified student demographic impact factors<br />

related to teaching in a classroom heavily impacted by these factors. <strong>Teacher</strong>s are rated and awarded<br />

points individually and make up 48% of a teacher’s Overall Annual Performance <strong>Evaluation</strong> Rating.<br />

A Self‐<strong>Evaluation</strong> process pertaining to the evidence‐based teaching practices and behaviors directly<br />

linked to the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices is completed by the classroom teacher. Each<br />

teacher analyzes the EPCs and related rubrics. After reflecting on his/her practices as delineated in the<br />

rubric descriptions, the teacher rates him/herself accordingly for each EPC. The rubric points are<br />

totaled. The Self‐<strong>Evaluation</strong> Table on page 27 identifies ranges of point totals determining the total<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!