Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix F Timeline for the Development/Implementation of Student Assessments The implementation plan for the development of an infrastructure to support District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades will be closely aligned with the assessment item bank development work being done by several groups that are being coordinated by the Florida Association of District School Superintendents (FADSS). The district teams working with development of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades will draw heavily from the work of the FADSS groups as well as their own content expertise. The initial timeline for this activity is listed below. Timeframe Specific Accomplishment Status July 1, 2011 – October 2011 January 2012– August 2012 September 2012 – June 2013 July 2013 – June 2014 July 2014 – June 2015 July 1, 2015 Initiate Creation of an Implementation Plan for Development of the infrastructure to support District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Phase 1 ‐ Development of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Phase 2 – Continued Development of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Phase 3‐ Continued Development of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Phase 4‐ Final Development of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Complete Implementation of District Determined, Administered, Scored, and Reported Student Growth/Proficiency Measurement Assessments for teachers of All Non‐FCAT Subjects and Grades Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending 99
Glossary Appendix G Alternative Certification Educator (ACE) Program A research‐based program offered through the Florida Department of Education designed to provide professional education preparation to newly hired teachers with subject area expertise who qualify for an initial Florida Certificate and need to fulfill instructional requirements to qualify as an educator. A ARROW An Accountability Report of Reflections and Outcomes of Work. The form is used as documentation of the implementation and evaluation of professional learning at the school and district levels. Attendance Determinant Criteria used to determine students included in the data set applied to determine student achievement. For teachers teaching Non‐FCAT students, the rule is: Students included in the student achievement rating portion of the teacher evaluation system have: 15 or less unexcused absences (Full‐year course) 10 or less unexcused absences (semester course) 5 or less unexcused absences (9 week course or 3rd 9 weeks for a 2nd semester course) Enrolled in both Full‐time Equivalency (FTE) Survey 2 & 3 for a full year course Enrolled in FTE Survey 2 and post‐test (1stsemester) Enrolled in FTE Survey 3 and post‐test (2nd semester) Note: An Unexcused tardy that results in more than half the class being missed is considered an unexcused absence Atypical Teacher A teacher whose teaching assignment is new, changes, or varies within the school year. This term is used with uncommon scenarios. C Category I Teachers Teachers either in the Professional Educator Competency (PEC) Program, the Alternative Certification Educator (ACE) Program, the Educator Preparation Institute (EPI) Program, or any classroom teacher that is new to the profession or new to the district regardless of the years of teaching experience and Florida Professional Educator Certification credentials. Category II Teachers Teachers with Florida Professional Educator Certification who have more than one year of teaching experience in the district. Contemporary Research Seminal, foundational, or empirical research conducted within the last five to seven years. Data Chats D 100
Page 1 and 2:
2012 Teacher Evaluation System Polk
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Page PCPS Mission
Page 5 and 6:
Core Values ‐ Polk County Public
Page 7 and 8:
Dear Teacher, As you review this ne
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction It is important to rec
Page 11 and 12:
Teacher Evaluation Philosophy The p
Page 13 and 14:
FCAT/State Assessment Teachers (Not
Page 15 and 16:
point value for the teacher for thi
Page 17 and 18:
Planned Use of Student Performance
Page 19 and 20:
2012‐2013: Use of Student Assessm
Page 21 and 22:
Category I: Significant Evaluation
Page 23 and 24:
Category II: Significant Evaluation
Page 25 and 26:
Classroom Teacher Observation Proce
Page 27 and 28:
Observation Implementation Practice
Page 29 and 30:
EPC f. Integrating cross content re
Page 31 and 32:
Requirements for Consistency in Eva
Page 33 and 34:
Alignment and Support of District a
Page 35 and 36:
As an element in Polk County’s co
Page 37 and 38:
Processes for Informing Teachers ab
Page 39 and 40:
with the teacher in a conference to
Page 41 and 42:
adjustments in system processes tha
Page 43 and 44:
Section 1. This act may be cited as
Page 45 and 46:
for measuring student learning grow
Page 47 and 48:
hearing. The hearing shall be condu
Page 49 and 50:
the identity of students for whom t
Page 51 and 52: under s. 1012.34 and shall provide
Page 53 and 54: district school board and have rece
Page 55 and 56: ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 necessary
Page 57 and 58: 2. The member must have completed 3
Page 59 and 60: Section 17. Chapter 2010‐279, Law
Page 61 and 62: deficiencies within a reasonable, p
Page 63 and 64: e. Models clear, acceptable oral an
Page 65 and 66: TARGET and ARROW Forms Appendix C T
Page 67 and 68: ARROW for School-Based Professional
Page 69 and 70: Appendix D POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEAC
Page 71 and 72: Essential Performance Criteria (EPC
Page 93 and 94: Situational Context Factors In orde
Page 95 and 96: Global Observation Feedback Form Te
Page 97 and 98: Teacher’s Overall Annual Performa
Page 99 and 100: Polk County School District Instruc
Page 101: Professional Development Plan Cross
Page 105 and 106: Highly Effective - a rating that in
Page 107 and 108: The adopted Florida Teacher Evaluat
Page 109 and 110: Teacher Evaluation Planning Session
Page 111 and 112: organization. (c.) Shall not interf
Page 113: Documentation of Collective Bargain
show all

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?