Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Professional Development Plan (PDP) and Cross‐Walk Category II teachers who receive a rating of Unsatisfactory on the Overall Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation Rating Form must be placed on a Professional Development Plan (PDP). This process is optional for teachers receiving an overall rating of Needs Improvement. When applied, the PDP must be prepared in a collaborative conference between the teacher and designated administrator within 10 days of the noted deficiency. The PDP is designed to provide up to 90 days of assistance; helping the teacher to correct deficiencies within the prescribed period of time and in accordance with the Student Success Act (see Appendix A). However, a Professional Development Plan (PDP) may be implemented at any time, when a Category II teacher continues to demonstrate unsatisfactory performance related to the specific Essential Performance Criteria. Category Two Only Interim Review Last Name First Name Interim Review SAP ID # Interim Review School Year Interim Review Teacher Signature Administrator Signature Planning Session Date Interim Review School Name Teacher Signature Administrator Signature Summary Review Date Met Goal Did NOT Meet Goal Goal Statement (One sheet per Goal) To improve my knowledge, skill and/or mental model related to: The Goal Statement, Strategies, Methods of Documentation and Timelines elements must be prepared. Related Domain/EPC Mark one of the options below for which the individual has been rated “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory”. Instructional Design, Lesson Planning, and Assessment EPC: Instructional, Delivery and Facilitation EPC: The Learning Environment EPC: Professional Responsibilities and Ethical Conduct EPC: 1 Comments: Strategies Documentation Method Timeline Professional Resource Team 2 3 4 97
Professional Development Plan Crosswalk Old EPC New EPC 2011 Student Performance •1f. Designing Student Assessments Planning for Learning •1c. Setting Instructional Outcomes •1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources and Technology •1e.Designing Coherent Instruction Instructional Strategies •1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources and Technology •1e. Designing Coherent Instruction •2e. Demontrating Flexibility and Responsiveness •2f. Intergrating Cross Content Reading and Writing Instruction Knowledge of Subject Matter •1a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy •1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students •1e. Designing Coherent Instruction Assessing for Learning & Instruction •1f. Designing Student Assessments •2d. Using Assessment in Instruction Managing the Learning Environment •3a. Creating an Envirionment of Respect and Rapport •3b. Establishing a Culture for Learning •3c. Managing Classroom Procedures •3d. Managing Student Behavior •3e. Organizing Physical Space Communication •2a. Communicating with Students •2b. Using Strategies to Evoke Higher Order Thinking •2c. Lesson Delivery and Engaging Students in Learning •4c. Communicating with Families Professionalism •4a. Attention to Equity and Diversity •4b. Maintaining Accurate Records •4d. Participating in a Professional Learning Community •4e. Individual Continuous Professional Improvement •4f. Professional Responsibilites 98
Page 1 and 2:
2012 Teacher Evaluation System Polk
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Page PCPS Mission
Page 5 and 6:
Core Values ‐ Polk County Public
Page 7 and 8:
Dear Teacher, As you review this ne
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction It is important to rec
Page 11 and 12:
Teacher Evaluation Philosophy The p
Page 13 and 14:
FCAT/State Assessment Teachers (Not
Page 15 and 16:
point value for the teacher for thi
Page 17 and 18:
Planned Use of Student Performance
Page 19 and 20:
2012‐2013: Use of Student Assessm
Page 21 and 22:
Category I: Significant Evaluation
Page 23 and 24:
Category II: Significant Evaluation
Page 25 and 26:
Classroom Teacher Observation Proce
Page 27 and 28:
Observation Implementation Practice
Page 29 and 30:
EPC f. Integrating cross content re
Page 31 and 32:
Requirements for Consistency in Eva
Page 33 and 34:
Alignment and Support of District a
Page 35 and 36:
As an element in Polk County’s co
Page 37 and 38:
Processes for Informing Teachers ab
Page 39 and 40:
with the teacher in a conference to
Page 41 and 42:
adjustments in system processes tha
Page 43 and 44:
Section 1. This act may be cited as
Page 45 and 46:
for measuring student learning grow
Page 47 and 48:
hearing. The hearing shall be condu
Page 49 and 50: the identity of students for whom t
Page 51 and 52: under s. 1012.34 and shall provide
Page 53 and 54: district school board and have rece
Page 55 and 56: ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 necessary
Page 57 and 58: 2. The member must have completed 3
Page 59 and 60: Section 17. Chapter 2010‐279, Law
Page 61 and 62: deficiencies within a reasonable, p
Page 63 and 64: e. Models clear, acceptable oral an
Page 65 and 66: TARGET and ARROW Forms Appendix C T
Page 67 and 68: ARROW for School-Based Professional
Page 69 and 70: Appendix D POLK COUNTY SCHOOLS TEAC
Page 71 and 72: Essential Performance Criteria (EPC
Page 93 and 94: Situational Context Factors In orde
Page 95 and 96: Global Observation Feedback Form Te
Page 97 and 98: Teacher’s Overall Annual Performa
Page 99: Polk County School District Instruc
Page 103 and 104: Glossary Appendix G Alternative Cer
Page 105 and 106: Highly Effective - a rating that in
Page 107 and 108: The adopted Florida Teacher Evaluat
Page 109 and 110: Teacher Evaluation Planning Session
Page 111 and 112: organization. (c.) Shall not interf
Page 113: Documentation of Collective Bargain
show all

Teacher Evaluation System - Polk County School District

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?