27.05.2014 Views

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE ROLE OF POLICE<br />

Emergency services<br />

and policing<br />

Proactive policing has been the norm, but<br />

that practice is now collapsing. The reactive<br />

fire brigade system is emerging as the<br />

model for police practice. By Mike Brogden<br />

Mike Brogden is co-author<br />

(with Graham Ellison) of<br />

<strong>Policing</strong> in an Age of Austerity.<br />

Routledge, <strong>2013</strong><br />

on crime, tough<br />

on the causes of crime.”<br />

“Tough<br />

The Labour Party slogan<br />

made good politics in outflanking the<br />

then Conservative Party claim of “tough<br />

on crime”. But it was dysfunctional for<br />

effective criminal justice. It bolstered the<br />

developing police intervention in local<br />

communities in the search for the mare’s<br />

nest, the ‘source’ of most petty crime.<br />

Critically, in that community intrusion,<br />

together with media contributions such<br />

as Cracker, it dramatically increased public<br />

expectations of both what the police<br />

could ‘do’ as well as a greater propensity<br />

to report minor problems such as<br />

incivilities to the policing agency.<br />

Such interventions are common to all<br />

three major emergency services – fire,<br />

health and police. Conventionally, we<br />

divide their practices into proactive and<br />

reactive. The former involves dealing with<br />

a problem – crime, fire, accidents, injury<br />

– before it starts. The fire service conducts<br />

mainly reactive work while increasingly<br />

over recent years both the police and health<br />

service attempt to operate preventatively.<br />

In police circles, such intervention<br />

contains both an historical legitimation<br />

as well as innovations. The latter involve<br />

mutations of American imports – for<br />

example, hot spot policing (learning<br />

where to concentrate police resources<br />

prior to potential law-breaking) problemsolving<br />

(using specialists to forestall social<br />

disorder by finding the underlying causes)<br />

and more recently, targeting potential<br />

offenders before a particular event and<br />

impeding their projects.<br />

Most such innovations have little<br />

substantive value. Hot spot policing<br />

demonstrates little that experienced<br />

detectives could not predict themselves.<br />

Problem-solving is stuck between the<br />

infinite search for causes and simply<br />

displacing the deviance somewhere<br />

else. Targeted policing often borders on<br />

the fringes of illegality, as in the recent<br />

malpractices by undercover police<br />

officers operating against environmental<br />

protesters.<br />

But crucially, proactive policing relies on<br />

two different but related measures – the<br />

traditional beat patrol and the current<br />

popularity of neighbourhood policing.<br />

The beat supposedly had several functions<br />

– to apprehend villains in the act, and<br />

to reassure the ‘respectables’. It was also<br />

tended to cow the ‘roughs’ from breaking<br />

out of their deprived areas (the ‘policing<br />

St Giles to guard St ames’ syndrome).<br />

The beat has been mythologised since<br />

the days of Robert Peel, an emblematic<br />

history that rests on dubious foundations.<br />

(Peel’s first London police officers were<br />

strangers policing strangers as they<br />

patrolled the boundaries of the Victorian<br />

rookeries.) A most tedious occupation for<br />

Image © GlynDavies.com<br />

60 | POLICING <strong>UK</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!