27.05.2014 Views

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE POLICE REFORM PROGRAMME<br />

“<strong>Policing</strong> now needs to build a new<br />

relationship with higher education, in<br />

which training, practice and research<br />

are much more closely related.”<br />

the reforms in England and Wales, it<br />

became obvious, very quickly, that the<br />

Review was timely for a number of<br />

reasons. The same reasons had already<br />

prompted reform north of the border.<br />

The Scots had already abandoned the<br />

existing law-based qualifications for new<br />

broader, university-based qualifications<br />

for their managers and, working with<br />

the Scottish universities and the Scottish<br />

Institute for <strong>Policing</strong> Research, had<br />

already framed a new relationship with<br />

Higher Education.<br />

In most of Scandinavia and Australia,<br />

police education had shifted almost<br />

entirely into higher education. New<br />

South Wales police required all recruits<br />

to pre-qualify with a foundation<br />

degree before joining – one of the<br />

few university degrees where the<br />

ability to shoot straight is part of the<br />

examinations!<br />

Fundamental reform<br />

In working through my Review it was<br />

clear that there was good support for<br />

and strong resistance to a fundamental<br />

reform of police training. Some of those<br />

I consulted in the service viewed a new<br />

relationship with higher education and<br />

a pre-qualification as a bar to certain<br />

types of recruit – “what if we wanted to<br />

recruit a 35-year-old plumber?” said one<br />

senior colleague – and a move away from<br />

practical skills.<br />

Others were keen that the police<br />

service transformed its training and the<br />

continuous professional development so<br />

clearly lacking in the workplace. There<br />

is, to be frank, a class-based element to<br />

this debate, both inside and outside the<br />

service. A number of commentators<br />

seem to prefer their coppers thick and<br />

conforming to a series of well-worked<br />

stereotypes.<br />

Modern meritocracy<br />

There is nothing new about this. In<br />

the 1930s, when Trenchard introduced<br />

his scheme for direct entry, the new<br />

graduate inspectors were caricatured<br />

as ‘genstables’ or gentleman constables<br />

and featured in cartoons supported by<br />

their butlers.<br />

Some suggested that Peel had dictated<br />

that policing should be a working class<br />

job by his insistence that it should not<br />

be a profession for gentlemen. However,<br />

this was to misunderstand that what he<br />

meant was policing, unlike the Armed<br />

Services of the 1820s, should be an<br />

occupation where merit, not wealth and<br />

class, should determine appointment<br />

and success.<br />

Peel’s determination for a meritocratic<br />

police service is still highly relevant. In<br />

my Review I tried to construct a modern<br />

meritocracy in which both academic<br />

attainment and occupational skills are<br />

blended in a new training approach.<br />

The need for technical and scientific<br />

knowledge means that, like medicine<br />

in the 19th century, policing now needs<br />

to build a new relationship with higher<br />

education, in which training, practice and<br />

research are much more closely related.<br />

A new professional body<br />

But equally, the police service needs a new<br />

professional body – a College of <strong>Policing</strong><br />

– with real ambitions to set the standards<br />

for practice and the qualifications for<br />

practitioners. There is no such body<br />

anywhere in the world.<br />

The Home Secretary has already<br />

signalled agreement with the idea of<br />

the police professional body, which was<br />

established at the end of 2012. It has<br />

already had a slightly difficult birth, with<br />

arguments as to whether its leadership<br />

should come from the profession of<br />

policing or from outside and what<br />

functions the body should take over.<br />

There remains a danger that it<br />

could simply be a rebranded NPIA or<br />

CENTREX (the body which NPIA<br />

subsumed) and, much as I remain proud<br />

of the achievements of the NPIA, that<br />

would be a mistake.<br />

The NPIA was unable to achieve the<br />

levels of ownership in the police service<br />

which are crucial to success. Despite<br />

our best efforts, we were regarded as a<br />

branch office of the Home Office.<br />

The College of <strong>Policing</strong> has to develop<br />

an independence of government that<br />

allows all those working in policing to feel<br />

that it is theirs and provides expression<br />

for best of police professional practice,<br />

while remaining a devoted servant of the<br />

public interest.<br />

POLICING <strong>UK</strong> | 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!