Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE POLICE REFORM PROGRAMME<br />
“If you are employing individuals who<br />
do not have the warranted powers<br />
of the Office of Constable, then you<br />
are losing accountability and the<br />
independence of the service.”<br />
chief officer and the police and crime<br />
commissioner will be good, grown up<br />
and adult, by the very nature of human<br />
dynamics, there are going to be some<br />
that don’t hit it off. And there are going<br />
to be some problems.<br />
here does the olice ederation<br />
of ngland and ales stand on<br />
parts of policing being priatised?<br />
We don’t have an ideological position<br />
where we are against privatisation<br />
of everything. We do, however, fear<br />
privatisation is going to go too far. Why<br />
is this so important<br />
If you are employing individuals who<br />
do not have the warranted powers of the<br />
Office of Constable, then you are losing<br />
accountability and the independence<br />
of the service. From an operational<br />
standpoint, you lose flexibility and<br />
resilience.<br />
We are also accountable to the public<br />
we serve and not to boards of directors<br />
or shareholders. And we don’t have to<br />
make a profit margin on those shares.<br />
All the money that comes into the police<br />
service goes on protecting the public.<br />
If the government is open to private<br />
companies taking on more policing roles,<br />
then this is the ideal opportunity to do it.<br />
These companies are not doing anything<br />
wrong they are doing absolutely the<br />
right thing for their shareholders.<br />
But we as police officers have a duty<br />
first and foremost to the public we serve.<br />
By cutting the police budget so far,<br />
the government has created a reason<br />
for police chiefs to have to look for<br />
alternatives such as privatisation.<br />
hat roles and parts of police<br />
wor should neer be priatised?<br />
Any role that takes away the resilience<br />
and flexibility of the service to a degree<br />
that public safety is put at risk. The<br />
ability to respond to major incidents<br />
may well go. I have real concerns about<br />
that. I don’t want to see riots and major<br />
disturbances in this country. Nobody<br />
wants to see more disorder similar to<br />
August 2011, but I think there is an<br />
inevitability about it.<br />
ow do ou see the police serice<br />
looing in ears time?<br />
I don’t think you can honestly predict<br />
that. There is so much flux at the<br />
moment, there are going to be so many<br />
changes that nobody can say definitively<br />
what it is going to be like in 10 years.<br />
And this worries me and just about every<br />
other police officer I speak to. Of every<br />
rank.<br />
Paul McKeever was interviewed by<br />
Royston Martis.<br />
1<br />
www.hmic.gov.ukpublicationpolicing-in-austerity-oneyear-on<br />
2<br />
www.civitas.org.ukcrimeeuropolice.htm<br />
44 | POLICING <strong>UK</strong>