Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE POLICE REFORM PROGRAMME<br />
Fair play on pay<br />
and conditions?<br />
Peter Neyroud gives a personal<br />
assessment of the Winsor Report<br />
Peter Neyroud is former Chief<br />
Constable of Thames Valley;<br />
former CEO of the National<br />
<strong>Policing</strong> Improvement Agency;<br />
and Editor, <strong>Policing</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />
Alongside the reforms of<br />
accountability, the other<br />
major plank to the coalition<br />
government’s reforms of the police are<br />
the changes to terms and conditions of<br />
employment set out in the two reports by<br />
Tom Winsor.<br />
Most of these have now been through<br />
the pay negotiation machinery, but a key<br />
battle remains for <strong>2013</strong>: the question of<br />
the employment status of police officers.<br />
Historically, police have been ‘officeholders’<br />
rather than employees and,<br />
by virtue of the agreements brokered<br />
after the only major police strikes in<br />
1919, unable to exercise the right to<br />
strike. In the minds of almost every<br />
police officer this restriction on their<br />
employee rights demands a reciprocal<br />
degree of responsibility in the way that<br />
their ‘employer’ – the government –<br />
treats them in respect of their pay and<br />
conditions.<br />
The need to meet this ‘covenant’ has<br />
proved increasingly problematic for<br />
government as the cost of police has<br />
increased over the last 30 years, since<br />
the last major renegotiation between<br />
the two sides following the Edmund<br />
Davies agreement. It is perhaps ironic,<br />
given that a Conservative coalition has<br />
led the current retrenchment from that<br />
agreement, that implementing Edmund<br />
Davies was one of Margaret Thatcher’s<br />
first moves as a new Prime Minister.<br />
In that case, the rise in police starting<br />
salaries and the push to fill vacant posts<br />
followed a dreadful period through the<br />
late 1970s when forces had struggled to<br />
recruit and tabloid papers regularly ran<br />
stories about police officers on benefits.<br />
As the Winsor report states, the next<br />
30 years are not likely to be like the last<br />
30 years.<br />
The starting point is very different.<br />
Winsor’s economist, Professor Disney,<br />
pointed out that most forces are not<br />
having difficulty recruiting. This<br />
continuing glut of applicants lies behind<br />
the controversial decision, now confirmed<br />
by the Home Secretary, to reduce the<br />
starting salary for a constable to £19,000.<br />
The move is controversial, because<br />
it appears to fly in the face of the other<br />
thrust of the Winsor report – to raise<br />
standards, including the educational<br />
qualifications of those joining the police<br />
service. Experience suggests that the rise<br />
in the starting salary brought about by<br />
Edmund Davies was a very significant<br />
driver of changes to the quality of<br />
recruits and an influx of graduates at the<br />
beginning of the 1980s.<br />
Key proposals<br />
There are a number of other key<br />
proposals in Winsor’s recommendations.<br />
He places considerable emphasis on<br />
‘fairness’ and the ‘Office of Constable’<br />
as the ‘bedrock’ of British policing. The<br />
result of this is a series of proposals that<br />
shift the rewards in policing towards 24-<br />
40 | POLICING <strong>UK</strong>