27.05.2014 Views

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE POLICE REFORM PROGRAMME<br />

Fair play on pay<br />

and conditions?<br />

Peter Neyroud gives a personal<br />

assessment of the Winsor Report<br />

Peter Neyroud is former Chief<br />

Constable of Thames Valley;<br />

former CEO of the National<br />

<strong>Policing</strong> Improvement Agency;<br />

and Editor, <strong>Policing</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2013</strong><br />

Alongside the reforms of<br />

accountability, the other<br />

major plank to the coalition<br />

government’s reforms of the police are<br />

the changes to terms and conditions of<br />

employment set out in the two reports by<br />

Tom Winsor.<br />

Most of these have now been through<br />

the pay negotiation machinery, but a key<br />

battle remains for <strong>2013</strong>: the question of<br />

the employment status of police officers.<br />

Historically, police have been ‘officeholders’<br />

rather than employees and,<br />

by virtue of the agreements brokered<br />

after the only major police strikes in<br />

1919, unable to exercise the right to<br />

strike. In the minds of almost every<br />

police officer this restriction on their<br />

employee rights demands a reciprocal<br />

degree of responsibility in the way that<br />

their ‘employer’ – the government –<br />

treats them in respect of their pay and<br />

conditions.<br />

The need to meet this ‘covenant’ has<br />

proved increasingly problematic for<br />

government as the cost of police has<br />

increased over the last 30 years, since<br />

the last major renegotiation between<br />

the two sides following the Edmund<br />

Davies agreement. It is perhaps ironic,<br />

given that a Conservative coalition has<br />

led the current retrenchment from that<br />

agreement, that implementing Edmund<br />

Davies was one of Margaret Thatcher’s<br />

first moves as a new Prime Minister.<br />

In that case, the rise in police starting<br />

salaries and the push to fill vacant posts<br />

followed a dreadful period through the<br />

late 1970s when forces had struggled to<br />

recruit and tabloid papers regularly ran<br />

stories about police officers on benefits.<br />

As the Winsor report states, the next<br />

30 years are not likely to be like the last<br />

30 years.<br />

The starting point is very different.<br />

Winsor’s economist, Professor Disney,<br />

pointed out that most forces are not<br />

having difficulty recruiting. This<br />

continuing glut of applicants lies behind<br />

the controversial decision, now confirmed<br />

by the Home Secretary, to reduce the<br />

starting salary for a constable to £19,000.<br />

The move is controversial, because<br />

it appears to fly in the face of the other<br />

thrust of the Winsor report – to raise<br />

standards, including the educational<br />

qualifications of those joining the police<br />

service. Experience suggests that the rise<br />

in the starting salary brought about by<br />

Edmund Davies was a very significant<br />

driver of changes to the quality of<br />

recruits and an influx of graduates at the<br />

beginning of the 1980s.<br />

Key proposals<br />

There are a number of other key<br />

proposals in Winsor’s recommendations.<br />

He places considerable emphasis on<br />

‘fairness’ and the ‘Office of Constable’<br />

as the ‘bedrock’ of British policing. The<br />

result of this is a series of proposals that<br />

shift the rewards in policing towards 24-<br />

40 | POLICING <strong>UK</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!