Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OVERVIEW<br />
“Another attempt at changing police<br />
pay and conditions of service (the<br />
Winsor Report) provoked <strong>Police</strong><br />
<strong>Federation</strong> opposition.”<br />
and conditions of service (the Sheehy<br />
eport) failed because of significant<br />
<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Federation</strong> opposition, but the<br />
<strong>Police</strong> and Magistrates’ Courts Act 1994<br />
gave the Home Secretary increased<br />
central authority while reducing the<br />
local representative element in police<br />
authorities.<br />
There were also some measurable<br />
successes. <strong>Police</strong> management structures<br />
were streamlined and some national<br />
agencies created. Irish republican<br />
terrorism, a deadly problem since the<br />
early 190s, was successfully constrained,<br />
although it would be the succeeding<br />
Labour government that would conclude<br />
the political agreement that effectively<br />
ended the terrorist campaign.<br />
Public perception<br />
Problems, however, dominated perception.<br />
ecorded crime began to decrease from<br />
1994 but it was not clear that this could be<br />
sustained. The police faced criticism over<br />
failures to address victims of racist and<br />
gender-based crimes, and to become more<br />
representative of the ethnically diverse<br />
society that was developing around it.<br />
<strong>Police</strong> numbers fell during an economic<br />
recession. These, together with the<br />
government’s failure to address antisocial<br />
behaviour, the principal concern of many<br />
local communities, gave a re-oriented<br />
Labour party, under Tony Blair, the<br />
opportunity to wrest the political initiative<br />
from the Conservatives.<br />
Labour in the 190s had focused its<br />
policing policy on increasing political<br />
influence and control, but because this<br />
was largely irrelevant to most peoples’<br />
personal experience, it gained the party<br />
no electoral advantage. Blair, in contrast,<br />
would be pragmatic. He would be ‘tough<br />
on crime, tough on the causes of crime’.<br />
His policing policy focused on delivering<br />
crime and disorder reduction through<br />
partnerships between the police and local<br />
authorities, neigbourhood policing and<br />
tough penal policies, all driven through<br />
with comprehensive legislation, powerful<br />
central controls, detailed targets and<br />
intrusive inspection regimes.<br />
Labour increased police numbers<br />
(including a vast growth in ‘civilian’<br />
support staff), adding almost 60,000 posts<br />
between 199 and 2010, thus enabling<br />
an expansion of both investigative and<br />
neighbourhood policing.<br />
Successive Labour Home Secretaries,<br />
audaciously annexing the Conservative<br />
slogan ‘<strong>Police</strong> eform’, forced through<br />
changes in police culture and practice,<br />
particularly with respect to ethnic diversity<br />
following the Macpherson eport<br />
(1999) into the murder of the black<br />
teenager Stephen Lawrence, and to pay<br />
and conditions of service, adopting or<br />
modifying several of the Sheehy eport<br />
recommendations. New national agencies<br />
were created to deal with serious and<br />
organised crime, training, technology and<br />
general support.<br />
In partnership with ACPO and<br />
the Inspectorate of Constabulary it<br />
restructured counter-terrorism policing<br />
along regional lines, part of a major<br />
overhaul of national counter terrorism<br />
following the 911 and attacks in New<br />
ork and London.<br />
ACPO’s development of its own<br />
extensive national doctrines and policies<br />
accentuated Labour’s centralising<br />
tendencies, but it was the government<br />
that gained an unenviable reputation<br />
for micromanagement which frustrated<br />
many professional managers and frontline<br />
personnel. Changes in recording practices<br />
obfuscated the genuine decline in crime<br />
while the continued presence of antisocial<br />
behaviour in many neighbourhoods<br />
limited the electoral advantage of its<br />
political and financial investment.<br />
Home Secretary Charles Clarke seriously<br />
miscalculated opposition to his 2005-6<br />
force-merger proposals, the abandonment<br />
of which presaged the decline in Labour’s<br />
perceived grip on the law and order issue<br />
which characterised its remaining years in<br />
office, particularly under Gordon Brown’s<br />
premiership (200-10).<br />
Period of experimentation<br />
A rejuvenated Conservative opposition<br />
under David Cameron promised to slash<br />
bureaucracy, introduce management<br />
freedoms and increase local accountability,<br />
and it was these policies that dominated<br />
the coalition (Conservative-Liberal<br />
Democrats) government’s approach to<br />
policing following its formation in May<br />
2010.<br />
However, these policies also carried a<br />
high degree of risk. Elected ‘police and<br />
crime commissioners’ would replace<br />
police authorities from November 2012,<br />
but this risked increased political influence.<br />
Another attempt at changing police pay<br />
and conditions of service (the Winsor<br />
eport) provoked <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Federation</strong><br />
opposition, while the government’s<br />
economic policies, part dogma, part<br />
pragmatic reaction to a severe recession,<br />
initiated cuts in numbers which would<br />
wipe out the growth under Labour.<br />
In short, by 2012 the police service<br />
was entering a period of extended<br />
constitutional and organisational<br />
experimentation, the outcome of which<br />
was far from certain.<br />
POLICING <strong>UK</strong> | 11