Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Policing UK 2013 - Police Federation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A FORCE FIT FOR THE FUTURE<br />
The criminal<br />
justice system<br />
Editor’s introduction<br />
Jim Barker-McCardle is the<br />
Chief Constable of Essex <strong>Police</strong><br />
and Head of the ACPO criminal<br />
justice business area<br />
The criminal justice system will see some crucial reforms in <strong>2013</strong>. A key area of change<br />
will be out of court disposals. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has consulted about<br />
changes to the system of Conditional Cautioning. The proposal, which is likely to be<br />
implemented early in <strong>2013</strong>, will see police take responsibility from the CPS for the<br />
majority of conditional cautioning decisions. The likelihood is that this will see an<br />
expansion in the use of this disposal.<br />
Alongside this the MoJ is also consulting about the “‘community remedy’” which<br />
would see victims given a choice of disposal conditions for their offender from a list<br />
agreed by the police and crime commissioner. This proposal is doubly controversial,<br />
drawing elected politicians directly into sentencing, while raising questions about the<br />
equity of justice if individual victims are involved in setting tariffs. At the same time<br />
Ministers have key decisions about extending court opening times, expanding the use<br />
of video conferencing of hearings and introducing neighbourhood justice.<br />
Where does the police service sit in<br />
the criminal justice system?<br />
You can probably describe law<br />
enforcement – of which we are obviously<br />
a very big part – as being the gateway to<br />
the criminal justice system. We work with<br />
our partners to ensure the system is as<br />
efficient and effective as possible – while<br />
never overlooking the overriding objective<br />
to deal with a criminal case justly.<br />
Why does the criminal justice<br />
system face accusations of being<br />
cumbersome and inefficient?<br />
It is very easy to criticise the criminal<br />
justice system. Sometimes that criticism<br />
is fair. Sometimes the system doesn’t get<br />
all the credit it deserves for work it leads<br />
itself to improve efficiency.<br />
We all have to recognise that the<br />
criminal justice system is big. And it is<br />
complex. People conceive it differently.<br />
Those inside the criminal justice system<br />
know that it is not just the judiciary and<br />
lay magistrates, the court service and<br />
police but prisons, the probation service,<br />
the Crown Prosecution Service, Victim<br />
Support and the defence community…<br />
sometimes a member of the public might<br />
understandably think of the criminal<br />
justice system as just the courtroom. But<br />
it is much wider than that. Justice and<br />
efficiency are not mutually exclusive. The<br />
challenge comes in the proper pursuit of<br />
efficiency without compromising justice.<br />
It is a system that is expected to<br />
handle everything from high-volume,<br />
comparatively less serious business<br />
through to extremely complex,<br />
demanding and sometimes long<br />
running cases. Anything from a minor<br />
motoring offence through to the most<br />
complex serious and organised crime<br />
investigations and complex international<br />
or global fraud cases can end up in the<br />
courtroom.<br />
There is an understandable desire<br />
to see the system move as efficiently as<br />
possible – particularly in processing highvolume<br />
less serious cases.<br />
102 | POLICING <strong>UK</strong>