Here - PMOD/WRC
Here - PMOD/WRC
Here - PMOD/WRC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Detailed Comparison of Illuminance Scale Realizations of KRISS and TKK<br />
Seung-Nam Park, Dong-Hoon Lee, Yong-Wan Kim, In-Won Lee,<br />
* Erkki Ikonen, * Mart Noorma and * Farshid Manoocheri<br />
Division of Optical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) PO Box 102, Yuseong,<br />
Daejeon 305-600, Korea<br />
*Metrology Research Institute, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK) and Centre for Metrology and<br />
Accreditation (MIKES) P.O. Box 3000, FI-02015 TKK, Finland<br />
Abstract. A detailed comparison of the illuminance<br />
realizations of KRISS and TKK is performed. The relative<br />
difference of spectral responsivity at 555 nm is<br />
(-0.3±0.8) %, while the difference of the color correction<br />
factor for the illuminant A is (0.28±0.38) %, and the<br />
expanded uncertainties are given for coverage factor k=2.<br />
The area measurement for the radiometric aperture agrees<br />
within (-0.04±0.06) %. Accordingly the difference of the<br />
illuminance responsivity is (-0.6±0.8) %. A direct<br />
comparison of the illuminance responsivity scales which<br />
are realized and maintained by the procedure of each<br />
institute shows an agreement of (-0.1±0.9) %.<br />
I. Introduction<br />
Since the candela as well as the related quantities are<br />
generally derived from illuminance, accurate realization of<br />
the illuminance is critical in photometry and radiometry.<br />
However, as realizing the illuminance scale requires a<br />
series of measurements, such as responsivity, spectral<br />
characteristics and aperture area of a photometer, a set of<br />
comparisons for only illuminance responsivity between<br />
NMIs as in the case of the CCPR-K3.b [1] may be<br />
insufficient for an appropriate guide to improve the<br />
uncertainty.<br />
In this paper, the measurement processes for the<br />
illuminance realization, such as the spectral responsivity at<br />
555 nm, color correction factor for the illuminant A and<br />
the aperture area of the artifact photometer are in parallel<br />
compared between KRISS and TKK. Finally, the<br />
illuminance scales realized and maintained by both<br />
institutes are also compared to give material for a<br />
discussion on the comparison of the measurement<br />
processes.<br />
II. Detailed Comparison of Illuminance Scale<br />
Realizations<br />
The illuminance responsivity of a photometer is<br />
obtained by the equation<br />
A⋅<br />
S555<br />
Rvi<br />
= (1),<br />
683 lm/W ⋅ f () e<br />
where A is the aperture area, S 555 the absolute spectral<br />
responsivity at 555 nm, and f(e) the color correction factor<br />
(ccf). The ccf is defined as<br />
∫ e( λ) V ( λ)<br />
dλ<br />
λ<br />
f () e ≡<br />
(2),<br />
e λ s λ dλ<br />
∫<br />
λ<br />
( ) ( )<br />
where e(λ) is relative spectral power distribution of the<br />
source and s(λ) the normalized spectral responsivity of the<br />
photometer.<br />
The artifact photometer for the comparison consists of<br />
a temperature-stabilized photometer head supplied by<br />
LMT and an external aperture of 7 mm diameter. The<br />
edges of the aperture were trimmed by a diamond-turning<br />
machine. The artifact was transferred to TKK after<br />
measurement at KRISS and then returned to KRISS for the<br />
drift check.<br />
At KRISS, the illuminance scale is realized by<br />
calibrating spectral responsivity of the photometers using a<br />
spectral responsivity comparator traceable to the absolute<br />
cryogenic radiometer. Relative spectral responsivity is<br />
measured against the single element silicon reference<br />
detector, while the absolute responsivity at 555 nm is<br />
compared to the silicon trap detector. The aperture area of<br />
the photometer is measured by two independent methods,<br />
Gaussian beam superposition (GBS)[2] and optical edge<br />
detection (OED). The OED method can be easily<br />
implemented by inserting a microscope and focusing the<br />
beam on the aperture plane in the GBS.<br />
Relative Spectral Responsivity<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
0.01<br />
0.001<br />
0.0001<br />
0.00001<br />
KRISS<br />
TKK<br />
0.000001<br />
300 500 700 900<br />
Wavelength /nm<br />
Figure 1. Relative spectral responsivity comparison of the<br />
artifact photometer.<br />
As far as the spectral characteristics measurement of<br />
the photometer for the illuminance realization is concerned,<br />
TKK has the procedure different from KRISS.[3].<br />
However, TKK measured the spectral characteristics of the<br />
artifact by comparison to the spectral responsivity<br />
reference. For the comparison, TKK used the spectral<br />
responsivity facility [4] and the reference trap detector<br />
which is traceable to the cryogenic radiometer.<br />
Figure 1 shows a comparison of the relative spectral<br />
responsivity. The spectral bandwidths of the measurements<br />
at TKK and KRISS are 1 nm and 4 nm, respectively. Even<br />
Proceedings NEWRAD, 17-19 October 2005, Davos, Switzerland 325