26.05.2014 Views

Here - PMOD/WRC

Here - PMOD/WRC

Here - PMOD/WRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Detailed Comparison of Illuminance Scale Realizations of KRISS and TKK<br />

Seung-Nam Park, Dong-Hoon Lee, Yong-Wan Kim, In-Won Lee,<br />

* Erkki Ikonen, * Mart Noorma and * Farshid Manoocheri<br />

Division of Optical Metrology, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) PO Box 102, Yuseong,<br />

Daejeon 305-600, Korea<br />

*Metrology Research Institute, Helsinki University of Technology (TKK) and Centre for Metrology and<br />

Accreditation (MIKES) P.O. Box 3000, FI-02015 TKK, Finland<br />

Abstract. A detailed comparison of the illuminance<br />

realizations of KRISS and TKK is performed. The relative<br />

difference of spectral responsivity at 555 nm is<br />

(-0.3±0.8) %, while the difference of the color correction<br />

factor for the illuminant A is (0.28±0.38) %, and the<br />

expanded uncertainties are given for coverage factor k=2.<br />

The area measurement for the radiometric aperture agrees<br />

within (-0.04±0.06) %. Accordingly the difference of the<br />

illuminance responsivity is (-0.6±0.8) %. A direct<br />

comparison of the illuminance responsivity scales which<br />

are realized and maintained by the procedure of each<br />

institute shows an agreement of (-0.1±0.9) %.<br />

I. Introduction<br />

Since the candela as well as the related quantities are<br />

generally derived from illuminance, accurate realization of<br />

the illuminance is critical in photometry and radiometry.<br />

However, as realizing the illuminance scale requires a<br />

series of measurements, such as responsivity, spectral<br />

characteristics and aperture area of a photometer, a set of<br />

comparisons for only illuminance responsivity between<br />

NMIs as in the case of the CCPR-K3.b [1] may be<br />

insufficient for an appropriate guide to improve the<br />

uncertainty.<br />

In this paper, the measurement processes for the<br />

illuminance realization, such as the spectral responsivity at<br />

555 nm, color correction factor for the illuminant A and<br />

the aperture area of the artifact photometer are in parallel<br />

compared between KRISS and TKK. Finally, the<br />

illuminance scales realized and maintained by both<br />

institutes are also compared to give material for a<br />

discussion on the comparison of the measurement<br />

processes.<br />

II. Detailed Comparison of Illuminance Scale<br />

Realizations<br />

The illuminance responsivity of a photometer is<br />

obtained by the equation<br />

A⋅<br />

S555<br />

Rvi<br />

= (1),<br />

683 lm/W ⋅ f () e<br />

where A is the aperture area, S 555 the absolute spectral<br />

responsivity at 555 nm, and f(e) the color correction factor<br />

(ccf). The ccf is defined as<br />

∫ e( λ) V ( λ)<br />

dλ<br />

λ<br />

f () e ≡<br />

(2),<br />

e λ s λ dλ<br />

∫<br />

λ<br />

( ) ( )<br />

where e(λ) is relative spectral power distribution of the<br />

source and s(λ) the normalized spectral responsivity of the<br />

photometer.<br />

The artifact photometer for the comparison consists of<br />

a temperature-stabilized photometer head supplied by<br />

LMT and an external aperture of 7 mm diameter. The<br />

edges of the aperture were trimmed by a diamond-turning<br />

machine. The artifact was transferred to TKK after<br />

measurement at KRISS and then returned to KRISS for the<br />

drift check.<br />

At KRISS, the illuminance scale is realized by<br />

calibrating spectral responsivity of the photometers using a<br />

spectral responsivity comparator traceable to the absolute<br />

cryogenic radiometer. Relative spectral responsivity is<br />

measured against the single element silicon reference<br />

detector, while the absolute responsivity at 555 nm is<br />

compared to the silicon trap detector. The aperture area of<br />

the photometer is measured by two independent methods,<br />

Gaussian beam superposition (GBS)[2] and optical edge<br />

detection (OED). The OED method can be easily<br />

implemented by inserting a microscope and focusing the<br />

beam on the aperture plane in the GBS.<br />

Relative Spectral Responsivity<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0.01<br />

0.001<br />

0.0001<br />

0.00001<br />

KRISS<br />

TKK<br />

0.000001<br />

300 500 700 900<br />

Wavelength /nm<br />

Figure 1. Relative spectral responsivity comparison of the<br />

artifact photometer.<br />

As far as the spectral characteristics measurement of<br />

the photometer for the illuminance realization is concerned,<br />

TKK has the procedure different from KRISS.[3].<br />

However, TKK measured the spectral characteristics of the<br />

artifact by comparison to the spectral responsivity<br />

reference. For the comparison, TKK used the spectral<br />

responsivity facility [4] and the reference trap detector<br />

which is traceable to the cryogenic radiometer.<br />

Figure 1 shows a comparison of the relative spectral<br />

responsivity. The spectral bandwidths of the measurements<br />

at TKK and KRISS are 1 nm and 4 nm, respectively. Even<br />

Proceedings NEWRAD, 17-19 October 2005, Davos, Switzerland 325

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!