26.05.2014 Views

Here - PMOD/WRC

Here - PMOD/WRC

Here - PMOD/WRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

High-temperature fixed-point radiators: The effect of the heat exchange<br />

within the cavity and between cavity and furnace tube on the temperature<br />

drop across the back wall of the cavity<br />

P. Bloembergen, Y. Yamada<br />

National Metrology Institute of Japan, AIST, Tsukuba, Japan<br />

P. Jimeno Largo<br />

University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain<br />

B.B. Khlevnoy<br />

All Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI), Moscow, Russia<br />

Abstract. At high temperatures the heat exchange within a<br />

cavity radiator and between cavity and front end of the<br />

associated furnace are considerably enhanced and by this<br />

the temperature drop across the back wall of the cavity<br />

within the cavity-furnace combination is markedly<br />

influenced. This will be demonstrated, theoretically and<br />

experimentally, for the eutectic fixed point Re-C, radiating<br />

at a temperature of 2474 °C.<br />

Introduction<br />

For the freezing points of silver and gold the following<br />

equation has been used earlier to estimate the temperature<br />

drop ∆T across the back-wall of the cavity [1]:<br />

4 d ⎛ r ⎞<br />

∆T<br />

= cosθ ⋅ε<br />

⋅σ<br />

⋅T<br />

⋅ ⋅⎜<br />

⎟ (1)<br />

K ⎝ L ⎠<br />

where θ is the tilt angle of the conical bottom, ε the<br />

emissivity of graphite, σ the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, T<br />

the temperature in Kelvin, d the thickness of the cavity<br />

bottom, K the thermal conductivity of graphite, r the<br />

aperture radius and L the cavity length. As shown below<br />

this estimate can be considered only as an upper bound to<br />

∆T since in its derivation heat exchange within the cavity<br />

(radiative and conductive) and between cavity and furnace<br />

front-end (radiative) has been neglected.<br />

2<br />

wavelengths of 650 and 950 nm, shown in columns 4 and 5,<br />

and discussed below. As demonstrated in Table 1, column 2,<br />

Eq. (1) indeed constitutes an upper bound to ∆T(3) ; the<br />

result for the ‘cell only’ relative to that for Eq. (1) shows the<br />

influence of the heat exchange within the cavity.<br />

Profile<br />

∆T(3)<br />

mK<br />

T(3)-T(8)<br />

mK<br />

T(3)-T(8)<br />

650 nm<br />

mK<br />

T(3)-T(8)<br />

950nm<br />

mK<br />

High 79 130 140 ±80 130 ±30<br />

Low 88 201<br />

Cell 136 684<br />

Eq. (1) 219 1340<br />

Table 1: Temperature drop ∆T(3) calculated for a cavity aperture<br />

of 3 mm and differences T(3)-T(8) between cavity-bottom<br />

temperatures calculated and measured for apertures of 3 mm and<br />

8 mm. Details are given in the text.<br />

Simulations based upon the finite-element method<br />

Simulations are presented for the cylindro-conical cavity<br />

in the Re-C eutectic cell 3S2, mounted in furnace VR10<br />

–A19 [2] with following cavity dimensions: L= 45 mm,<br />

diameter = 8 mm, θ = 30 °, d = 3 mm, without and with an<br />

aperture, 3 mm in diameter. For graphite we assumed : ε =<br />

0.86, K(at 2500 °C) = 36.4 Wm -1 K -1 .<br />

Columns 2 and 3 of Table 1 show the temperature drop<br />

∆T(3) for a cavity aperture of 3 mm and the difference<br />

T(3)-T(8) between cavity-bottom temperatures for apertures<br />

of 3 mm and 8 mm, calculated for the furnace-temperature<br />

profiles T(x), denoted as low and high, shown in Figure 1. In<br />

the table these results are compared with calculations (a)<br />

for the cell only, formally implying T(x) = 0 K, (b) by means<br />

of Eq. (1), and (c) with experimental results, obtained at<br />

Figure 1: Furnace-temperature profiles T(x), low and high, used<br />

for calculating the temperature drop ∆T(3) and the differences<br />

T(3)-T(8); x defines the distance to the cavity aperture.<br />

All of the calculated results presented here are based upon<br />

simulations of the temperature drop ∆T at the end of the<br />

melting plateau in which-ideally-the liquid-solid interface<br />

coincides with the outer wall of the cavity tube. The<br />

simulations have been performed using ANSYS, a<br />

finite-element software package; details are given in [3].<br />

Proceedings NEWRAD, 17-19 October 2005, Davos, Switzerland 287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!