erties of detectors (with different coatings) with sufficient accuracy to realize the calibration. Besides, it is offered the additional calibration of the reference detectors by the method of selective absorbing filters, which has been developed and successfully applied by authors from the INP at the performance of the International Science and Technology Center (ISTC) project # 438 [Pindyurin et al., 2000]. Features of calibration of the SSP instrumentation with the method of the reference detector at the SR beam: - Time modulation of the SR beam: The SR beam from the storage ring VEPP-4 is the short and periodically repeated flashes (with duration less than 1 nsec and the frequency about 1 MHz). As the photodetectors of the SSP instrumentation work in an pulse registering mode [Avakyan et al., 2001], that the part of multi-electron events (i.e. more than 1 photoelectron emission from a photocathode of the detector) in the output signal grows when the loading of the detector is increased. To minimize the systematic error, which connected to this phenomenon, the loading of detectors is necessary to limit up to 10 5 pulses/sec, by decrease of intensity of the SR beam. Calculations show, that in this case the part of multi-electron events will not exceed 5.5 %. Thus maintenance of loading of the detector in a range 10 3 – 10 4 pulses/sec gives the best accuracy of calibration measurements [Afanas’ev et al., 2004]. - Polarization of the SR beam: In contrast to the non-polarized solar radiation, the SR beam in the median plane of the orbit is linearly polarized. To consider the possible systematic error connected to it, measurements with the spectrometers in different positions relatively to the plane of polarization are provided. - Phase volume of a radiation source: From the point of view of the optical circuits of the SSP spectrometers [Avakyan et al., 1998, 2002], the Sun is the removed source with the limited angular size, whereas the SR source is almost indefinitely removed point source. As the focusing optical circuits of the SSP spectrometers have been developed to register the solar radiation, then for the account of the given geometrical factor on results of calibration, it is offered to carry out additional experiments. The additional calibration procedures The method of the absolute calibration of SEMs, lters, gratings, as well as the apparatus as a whole, consists in a determination of a radiant power of a SR beam for a given wavelength that comes through an entrance of the element under calibration. The SR ux can be calculated theoretically or measured experimentally with calibrated detectors. The radiation of the necessary wavelength is extracted either by spectrometers or diffraction gratings, or multilayer mirrors and lters. The earliest variant of the absolute calibration method was described in Ref. [Afanas’ev et al., 2005]. Now together with the basic procedures, it is offered to apply two identical spectrometers of the SSP, located consistently [Avakyan, 2005], for the calibration goal. The procedure consists in a performance of two stages: 1. The spectrometer #1 (we suppose to use the X-ray/EUV spectrometers) without the SEM detectors is set at a SR beam, while the completely equipped spectrometer #2 with its input slit is alternately integrated to an output slit of each channels of the spectrometer #1. After execution of measurements of a counting rate with the SEM with scanning of all ranges of the spectrum of the spectrometer #2 [Avakyan et al., 2002], the spectrometer #2 is removed, and its SEMs are replaced in corresponding channels of the spectrometer #1. Then the measurements of counting rate with scanning of all ranges of the spectrum are carried out again. The difference in results of measurements with the SEM at the spectrometers is the spectral efficiency of diffraction grating of the spectrometer #2. After that the grating from the spectrometer #2 is replaced in the spectrometer #1, and the control measurements, including measurements of absolute spectral efficiency of the SEM, and finally, a spectral throughput of the SSP spectrometer #1, are carried out. For this goal, at a final stage of theoretical and/or experimental works (with use of absolute detectors) are executed by definition of the spectral intensity of the entrance SR beam. 2. For absolute spectral calibration of the SSP radiometers (with filters) there will be used the spectrometer #1 plus a radiometer. But at the first stage the single SEM will be graduated at all four channels of this spectrometer. Then a radiation transmission of the set of filters in a disk of radiometer [Avakyan et al., 1998] in the given structure of placing of two devices is measured with the calibrated SEM. Advantage of the offered way of absolute calibration with use of the pair of the SSP devices (one of which is the spectrometer) is an opportunity of the simplified consideration of geometry of the absolute measurement experiment and, as a result, increase of accuracy of the calibration. Conclusion It is offered the absolute calibration procedures at the synchrotron radiation sources in the spectral range from 0.25 up to 122 nm (5000 - 10 eV) for the Space Solar Patrol (SSP) instrumentation. Thus, methods of reference detectors and selective absorbing filters are accepted as a basis. The unique methods based on use of the SSP spectrometers and radiometers are also offered as additional calibration procedures. Moreover, requirements to the metrological stations organized for the calibration have been considered. Acknowledgments This work has been supported by the grant of International Science and Technology Center through the Project #2500 «Calibration of the Space Solar Patrol apparatus at the synchrotron source». The authors are grateful to foreign partners of the project: A. Aylward (UK), J.-P. Delaboudiniere (France), A. Hilgers (Holland), N. Pailer, G. Schmidtke, F. Scholze (Germany). References Afanas'ev, I. M., Mironov, A. I., Chernikov D.A. Investigation of statistic aspects of use of a synchrotron radiation beam for calibration of the “Solar Patrol” instrumentation, Articles of the 6th Int. conf. “Applied optics”, 1 (2), 425-428, 2004. Afanas’ev, I. M., Avakyan, S. V., et al. Achievements in creation of the Space patrol apparatus of ionizing radiation of the Sun, Nuclear Inst. and Meth. in Phys. Res. (A), 543, 312-316, 2005. Avakyan, S. V., Voronin, N. A., Yefremov, A. I., et al. Methodology and equipment for space-based monitoring of ionizing solar radiation, J. Opt. Technol., 65 (12), 124-131, 1998. Avakyan, S. V., Afanas'ev, I. M., Voronin, N. A., et al. Developing apparatus for permanent space patrol of the ionizing radiation of the Sun, J. Opt. Technol. 68 (6), 421-427, 2001. Avakyan, S. V., Afanas'ev, I. M., Voronin, N. A., et al. Development of an x-ray spectrometer for a Space Solar Patrol, J. Opt. Technol. 69 (11), 818-821, 2002. Avakyan, S. V., Space solar patrol of Absolute Measurements of Ionizing solar radiation, Adv. in Space Res., 2005. In press. Pindyurin, V. F., Subbotin, A. N., et al. Absolute calibration of X-ray semiconductor detectors against synchrotron radiation of the VEPP-3 storage ring, Metrologia, 37, 5, 497-500, 2000. 164
Using a Blackbody to Determine the Longwave Responsivity of Shortwave Solar Radiometers for thermal offset error correction I. Reda 1 , J. Hickey 2 , D. Myers 1 , T. Stoffel 1 , S. Wilcox 1 , C. Long 3 , E. G. Dutton 4 , D. Nelson 4 , and J. J. Michalsky 4 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden CO 2 The Eppley Laboratory Newport RI 3 Pacific Northwest Laboratory Richland WA. 4 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder CO Abstract : Thermopile pyranometers' thermal offsets have been recognized since the pyranometer’s inception. This offset is often overlooked or ignored because its magnitude is small compared to the overall solar signal at high irradiance levels. With the demand of smaller uncertainty in measuring solar radiation, recent publications have described a renewed interest in this offset, its magnitude, and its effect on solar monitoring networks for atmospheric science and solar radiation applications. Recently, it has been suggested that the magnitude of the pyranometer thermal offset is the same if the pyranometer is shaded or unshaded. Therefore, calibrating a pyranometer using the method known as the shade/unshade method would result in accurate responsivity calculations, because the thermal offset error is canceled. Nevertheless, when the shade/unshade responsivity is used during the outdoor data collection, the resultant shortwave radiation would be underestimated if the thermal offset error is not corrected for. When using the component sum method for the calibration, the thermal offset error, which is typically negative when the sky is cloudless, does not cancel, resulting in an underestimated shortwave responsivity. Most operational pyranometers used for solar radiation monitoring networks are calibrated using the summation method since it is possible to calibrate many pyranometers simultaneously. From this arises the importance of correcting the summation method results to account for the thermal offset error. <strong>Here</strong> we describe the use of a laboratory blackbody to calculate the netlongwave responsivity of pyranometers, which is largely responsible for the offset error. This longwave responsivity is then used to correct shortwave responsivity derived from summation method calibration Procedures to accomplish the correction, and the associated uncertainties are described. Figure 1 illustrates the NREL Blackbody calibration setup. Figure 2 shows the responses of several popular types of pyranometers to net infrared radiation measured during the laboratory calibrations. Proceedings NEWRAD, 17-19 October 2005, Davos, Switzerland 165
- Page 1 and 2:
NEWRAD PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9 TH INTE
- Page 3 and 4:
NEWRAD 2005 Scientific Program Day
- Page 5 and 6:
14:50 Hiroshi Shitomi, AIST 5-3 Pho
- Page 7 and 8:
NEWRAD 2005 Scientific Program-Post
- Page 9 and 10:
33. Drift in the absolute responsiv
- Page 11 and 12:
Session 6 Novel Techniques 64. The
- Page 13:
Session 9 Realisation of scales 94.
- Page 17:
Absolute Accuracy of Total Solar Ir
- Page 21 and 22:
Low-uncertainty absolute radiometri
- Page 23 and 24:
NIST Reference Cryogenic Radiometer
- Page 25 and 26:
Measurement of the absorptance of a
- Page 27:
Grooves for Emissivity and Absorpti
- Page 31 and 32:
New apparatus for the spectral radi
- Page 33:
VUV and Soft X-ray metrology statio
- Page 37 and 38:
The metrology line on the SOLEIL sy
- Page 39:
Cryogenic radiometer developments a
- Page 42 and 43:
measured with BiTe thermopiles. Exp
- Page 44 and 45:
variations of the spectral sensitiv
- Page 46 and 47:
aperture area by I = π·L·F·A, w
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 1 Ratio of radiometric power
- Page 51 and 52:
Consistency of radiometric temperat
- Page 53:
Project of absolute measuring instr
- Page 57:
Session 2 UV, Vis, and IR Radiometr
- Page 60 and 61:
Table 1: Summary of the quality ass
- Page 62 and 63:
wavelength / nm U180 @ MLS band wid
- Page 64 and 65:
ight half is uncoated. Measurements
- Page 66 and 67:
Change [%] 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 PTFE d
- Page 68 and 69:
had been accommodated to industrial
- Page 70 and 71:
Relative Uncertainty 0.4% 0.3% 0.2%
- Page 72 and 73:
instrument differences or from diff
- Page 74 and 75:
3.00E-08 Nomalized radiant flux 2.5
- Page 76 and 77:
frequencies, the chopping frequency
- Page 78 and 79:
600 mA for each set. In both cases,
- Page 80 and 81:
Detailed and comparative results wi
- Page 82 and 83:
measurement to an independent spect
- Page 84 and 85:
The stability of silicon n-on-p jun
- Page 86 and 87:
applied. Reproducibility of measure
- Page 88 and 89:
Mutual comparison Mutual comparison
- Page 91 and 92:
A comparison of the performance of
- Page 93 and 94:
Stray-light correction of array spe
- Page 95 and 96:
Characterizing the performance of U
- Page 97 and 98:
Optical Radiation Action Spectra fo
- Page 99 and 100:
A newly developed double broadband
- Page 101 and 102:
On potential discrepancies between
- Page 103 and 104:
Correcting for bandwidth effects in
- Page 105 and 106:
Establishment of Fiber Optic Measur
- Page 107 and 108:
Detector-based NIST-traceable Valid
- Page 109 and 110:
Long-term calibration of a New Zeal
- Page 111 and 112:
Drift in the absolute responsivitie
- Page 113 and 114: Radiance source for CCD low-uncerta
- Page 115 and 116: Improved NIR spectral responsivity
- Page 117 and 118: Characterization of a portable, fib
- Page 119 and 120: Synchrotron radiation based irradia
- Page 121 and 122: The Spectral Irradiance and Radianc
- Page 123 and 124: NIST BXR I Calibration A. Smith, T.
- Page 125 and 126: NIST BXR II Infrared Transfer Radio
- Page 127 and 128: Proceedings NEWRAD, 17-19 October 2
- Page 129 and 130: Spectral responsivity interpolation
- Page 131 and 132: Monochromator Based Calibration of
- Page 133 and 134: Study of the Infrared Emissivity of
- Page 135 and 136: Radiometric Stability of a Calibrat
- Page 137 and 138: Session 3 Photolithography and UV P
- Page 139 and 140: NEWRAD 2005: Improvements in EUV re
- Page 141 and 142: Measuring pulse energy with solid s
- Page 143 and 144: Vacuum ultraviolet quantum efficien
- Page 145 and 146: Spatial Anisotropy of the Exciton R
- Page 147 and 148: Comparison of spectral irradiance r
- Page 149 and 150: Session 4 Remote sensing Proceeding
- Page 151 and 152: Solar Radiometry from SORCE G. Kopp
- Page 153 and 154: Inter-comparison Study of Terra and
- Page 155 and 156: The Solar Bolometric Imager - Recen
- Page 157 and 158: On measuring the radiant properties
- Page 159 and 160: A Model of the Spectral Irradiance
- Page 161 and 162: Determination of Aerosol Optical De
- Page 163: Procedures of absolute calibration
- Page 167 and 168: On the drifts exhibited by cryogeni
- Page 169 and 170: On-orbit Characterization of Terra
- Page 171 and 172: Space solar patrol mission for moni
- Page 173 and 174: Multi-channel ground-based and airb
- Page 175 and 176: Thermal Modelling and Digital Servo
- Page 177 and 178: Calibration of Filter Radiometers f
- Page 179 and 180: Radiometric Calibration of a Coasta
- Page 181 and 182: A Verification of the Ozone Monitor
- Page 183 and 184: Session 5 Photometry and Colorimetr
- Page 185 and 186: Review on new developments in Photo
- Page 187 and 188: Linking Fluorescence Measurements t
- Page 189 and 190: Photoluminescence from White Refere
- Page 191 and 192: A Simple Stray-light Correction Mat
- Page 193 and 194: New robot-based gonioreflectometer
- Page 195 and 196: Rotational radiance invariance of d
- Page 197 and 198: Minimizing Uncertainty for Traceabl
- Page 199 and 200: Development of a total luminous flu
- Page 201 and 202: Determination of the diffuser refer
- Page 203 and 204: DEVELOPMENT OF A LUMINANCE STANDARD
- Page 205 and 206: Measuring photon quantities in the
- Page 207 and 208: Session 6 Novel techniques Proceedi
- Page 209 and 210: Characterization of germanium photo
- Page 211 and 212: Determination of luminous intensity
- Page 213 and 214: ËÒйÔÓØÓÒ ×ÓÙÖ ÖÐÒ
- Page 215 and 216:
The Measurement of Surface and Volu
- Page 217 and 218:
The evaluation of a pyroelectric de
- Page 219 and 220:
UV detector calibration based on an
- Page 221 and 222:
NEWRAD 2005: Non selective thermal
- Page 223 and 224:
NEWRAD 2005 Calibration of Current-
- Page 225 and 226:
Simplified diffraction effects for
- Page 227 and 228:
Widely Tunable Twin-Beam Light Sour
- Page 229 and 230:
Measurement of quantum efficiency u
- Page 231 and 232:
Session 7 International Comparisons
- Page 233 and 234:
The CCPR K1-a Key Comparison of Spe
- Page 235 and 236:
Comparison of Measurements of Spect
- Page 237 and 238:
APMP PR-S1 comparison on irradiance
- Page 239 and 240:
Comparison Measurements of Spectral
- Page 241 and 242:
Comparison of mid-infrared absorpta
- Page 243 and 244:
Comparison of photometer calibratio
- Page 245 and 246:
A Comparison of Re-C, Pt-C, and Co-
- Page 247 and 248:
Session 8 Radiometric and Photometr
- Page 249 and 250:
Application of Metal (Carbide)-Carb
- Page 251 and 252:
On Estimation of Distribution Tempe
- Page 253 and 254:
Hyperspectral Image Projectors for
- Page 255 and 256:
Reproducible Metal-Carbon Eutectic
- Page 257 and 258:
Thermodynamic temperature determina
- Page 259 and 260:
Spatial Light Modulator-based Advan
- Page 261 and 262:
Novel subtractive band-pass filters
- Page 263 and 264:
Analysis of the Uncertainty Propaga
- Page 265 and 266:
Absolute linearity measurements on
- Page 267 and 268:
Comparison of two methods for spect
- Page 269 and 270:
Precision Extended-Area Low Tempera
- Page 271 and 272:
Flash Measurement System for the 25
- Page 273 and 274:
A normal broadband irradiance (Heat
- Page 275 and 276:
A laser-based radiance source for c
- Page 277 and 278:
Furnace for High-Temperature Metal
- Page 279 and 280:
Investigations of Impurities in TiC
- Page 281 and 282:
Determining the temperature of a bl
- Page 283 and 284:
High-temperature fixed-point radiat
- Page 285 and 286:
Long-term experience in using deute
- Page 287 and 288:
High-temperature fixed-point radiat
- Page 289 and 290:
A comparison of Co-C, Pd-C, Pt-C, R
- Page 291 and 292:
Irradiance measurements of Re-C, Ti
- Page 293 and 294:
Evaluation and improvement of the p
- Page 295 and 296:
The Spectrally Tunable LED light So
- Page 297 and 298:
Session 9 Realisation of scales Pro
- Page 299 and 300:
The Realization and the Disseminati
- Page 301 and 302:
The establishment of the NPL infrar
- Page 303 and 304:
The PTB High-Accuracy Spectral Resp
- Page 305 and 306:
ÆÛ ÑØÓ ÓÖ Ø ÔÖÑÖÝ ÖÐ
- Page 307 and 308:
An integrated sphere radiometer as
- Page 309 and 310:
From X-rays to T-rays: Synchrotron
- Page 311 and 312:
Infrared Radiometry at LNE: charact
- Page 313 and 314:
Transfer standard pyrometers for ra
- Page 315 and 316:
Preliminary Realization of a Spectr
- Page 317 and 318:
New photometric standards developme
- Page 319 and 320:
Distribution temperature scale real
- Page 321 and 322:
Gloss standard calibration by spect
- Page 323 and 324:
Absolute cryogenic radiometry in th
- Page 325 and 326:
Detailed Comparison of Illuminance
- Page 327 and 328:
Radiometric Temperature Comparisons
- Page 329 and 330:
Characterization of Thermopile for
- Page 331 and 332:
Detector Based Traceability Chain E
- Page 333 and 334:
Comparison of the PTB Radiometric S
- Page 335 and 336:
Spectral Responsivity Scale between
- Page 337 and 338:
Realization of the NIST Total Spect
- Page 339 and 340:
Goniometric Realisation of Reflecta