ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore
ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore
ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>‐<strong>5776</strong> <strong>CD</strong>‐<strong>Rom</strong> <strong>edition</strong>
Natura Montenegrina journal for science and popular science<br />
PUBLISHED BY:<br />
IZDAVAČ:<br />
Natural History Museum of Montenegro<br />
Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />
Editor in chief - Glavni urednik:<br />
Technical editor - Tehnički urednik:<br />
Marko KARAMAN<br />
Snežana DRAGIĆEVIĆ<br />
EDITORIAL - REDAKCIJA<br />
Akad. Prof. Dr Gordan Karaman<br />
Prof. Dr Sreten Mandić<br />
Prof. Dr Drago Marić<br />
Prof. Dr Milivoje Purić<br />
Dr Vlado Pešić<br />
Ondrej Vizi<br />
Marko Karaman M.Sc.<br />
Suzana Brajović M.Sc.<br />
Mr Gordana Kasom M.Sc.<br />
Danijel Vincek<br />
Electronic arrangement of <strong>CD</strong> ROM: Sreten Šćepanović,<br />
Elektronska obrada diska: Marko Karaman<br />
Logo designer:<br />
Lazar Jakovljević<br />
Dizajn logoa:<br />
ON LINE EDITION: www.pmcg.cg.yu/Natura_Montenegrina.html<br />
<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155 On line <strong>edition</strong><br />
address for contact and exchange / adresa za kontakt i razmjenu:<br />
Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF MONTENEGRO<br />
P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />
E-mail: natura@pmcg.cg.yu
Natura Montenegrina<br />
Journal for science and popular science<br />
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS<br />
"Natura Montenegrina" publishes scientific, professional and scientific-popular<br />
papers from the field of biology, geology, forestry, biotechnique and environmental<br />
protection, surveys of scientific and professional publications, reviews and releases on<br />
scientific meetings, photographs from the nature and information of general<br />
significance.<br />
"Natura Montenegrina" is published exclusively in electronic form, as <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong><br />
(<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>-<strong>5776</strong>) and in On-line <strong>edition</strong> (<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155) at web address of Natural<br />
History Museum of Montenegro www.pmcg.co.me.<br />
Manuscripts are submitted to the Editorial office (Natural History Museum of<br />
Montenegro, PO.O.Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Crna Gora (Montenegro), in two<br />
copies, legibly typed on paper of format A4 with double spacing and margin of 4 cm on<br />
the left side, with not more than 30 rows on one page and on floppy disks, <strong>CD</strong> or DVD<br />
discs. To avoid hard copy, papers could be send on E-mail: natura@pmcg.co.me<br />
Manuscripts of scientific and professional papers are published exclusively in the<br />
English Language. Authors whose native language is not English are encouraged to<br />
have their manuscripts read by a native English-speaking colleague before submission.<br />
Instruction for the work on the computer: Word 6.0 or more recent; font Arial, 10<br />
pt, distance between the letters 0.5 pt, titles and subtitles without Caps Lock, spacing<br />
single. Use in text as little formatting as possible (use only bold and italics where<br />
necessary). Special symbols (e.g. male or female sign) should be avoided because they<br />
are likely to be altered when files are read on different computers. You can code them<br />
as m# and f#, which can be replaced during page setting.<br />
- The title should be concise and informative.<br />
- The full name of the author(s) must be given below the title and should be<br />
typed in the upper case.<br />
- The address of each author should be given below the name of author(s). E-mail<br />
address(es) should be provided if possible.<br />
- The address in scientific and professional papers is followed by a brief synopsis<br />
(summary) in the English Language, than title and synopsis in<br />
Montenegrin/Serbian/other. Synopsis, (till 10 rows) consists of the data on<br />
thematics of the paper and the key words are given at the end. Abstract (summary,<br />
synopsis) in English Language are obligatory. Abstracts in other languages<br />
(Montenegrian, Serbian or other) we suggest to be included in addition to English<br />
abstract. Authors may submit longer extracts (summary) in<br />
Montenegrian/Serbian/other at the end of the paper. Papers which have already been<br />
published either in their entity or in essential parts shall not be accepted for<br />
publishing.<br />
Scientific paper, as a rule, should have the following chapters: introduction,<br />
subject and method of research/work, results with discussion, conclusion, which should<br />
provide a clear and brief picture of the research and obtained results, list of literature<br />
used and (optionally) summary in the alternative language. The arrangement of the<br />
main text may varies with different types of papers, but should start with an<br />
introduction and end with list of literature.<br />
All literature cited in the text must be listed in the references in the following<br />
format:<br />
3
- Journal paper:<br />
MARIĆ, D., ĆIROVIĆ, R. 2002: Morphological Characteristics of Bass (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus,<br />
1758) (Percidae, Pisces) from Skadar Lake. - Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica,1: 125-134, .<br />
- Book chapter:<br />
COBLE, D. & KNEŽEVIĆ, B. 1981: Growth and mortality of bleak (Alburnus albidus alborella) and<br />
carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Lake Skadar. In: Karaman, G.S. & Beeton, A.M. (Eds), The Biota and<br />
Limnology of Lake Skadar. - Biološki zavod Titograd, Smithsonian Institution Washington. pp:<br />
320-333.<br />
- Book:<br />
BOLTON, B. 1995: A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. - Harward University Press,<br />
Cambridge, Mass., London, 504 pp.<br />
- Internet resources:<br />
AUTHOR (year): Title of website, database or other resources. - Publisher name and location (if<br />
indicated), number of pages (if known). Available from: http://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx (Date of last<br />
access)<br />
- Disertations and non-serial proceedings of symposia/conferences are to be treated as<br />
books and cited as such.<br />
Jornal titles must be written in full (not abbreviated).<br />
The names of quoted authors are written expanded 2.5 pt; the year of publishing of<br />
mentioned quotation comes next. Scientific names of the taxa are written in italics. The name of<br />
the author of a taxon is quoted only the first time in the text and on the figure, subsequently it is<br />
not quoted, provided that the text does not loose its clarity.<br />
Scope of one manuscript is limited to 16 pages (2,000 symbols per page) where two<br />
illustrations equal one page. Exceptionally, if the contents and quality justify that, the papers may<br />
have larger scope.<br />
Texts for the tables, figures and other contributions are written separately from the main<br />
text, author clearly designates in the text, respectively on margin of the manuscript on the paper<br />
the place on which that contribution should be inserted.<br />
Graphs, tables and drawings are submitted made in Indian ink on white or on paus paper in<br />
larger format (A4 format desirable) than it will be in the publication, or they should be made in<br />
appropriate program (Word, Excel, Corel-Draw). Photographs should be clear, with contrast on<br />
shining paper.<br />
Should the paper contain scanned contributions they should be submitted in TIFF, .BMP or<br />
.JPG format with resolution of 200 dpi.<br />
Summary in Montenegrin/Serbian/other should be brief, sufficient to acquaint the reader<br />
with the character of the paper, results and conclusions regarding the problem dealt with. Above<br />
the text of the summary there should be the name and the address of the author and the title of<br />
the paper.<br />
Scientific-popular and other articles should present interesting things and events from the<br />
nature. They are submitted in English and the Montenegrin/Serbian language; should the author<br />
fail to do so the editorial board is entitled to have the paper trenslated into the alternative<br />
language. They should be original, written in a clear, readable style, illustrated by the quality<br />
photographs. The authorship of the photographs has to be clearly indicated. Original photographs<br />
or scanned ones with resolution of 200 dpi should be submitted. The original negative may be<br />
submitted, and the slides must be submitted in the original.<br />
Marko G. Karaman<br />
Editor in chief<br />
4
Dear Colleagues,<br />
The Natural History Museum of Montenegro has published the Journal of<br />
science and popular-science „NATURA MONTENEGRINA“ since 2001 in<br />
electronic format and has distributed its <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong>. At its beginings the journal<br />
was primarily designated for the increasing number of young Montenegrian<br />
scientists, mostly biologists and other related fields, as a medium that presented<br />
their scientific findings.<br />
Six years later we are changing our goals – to become a journal that will<br />
publish original scientific and professional articles in the fields of<br />
research, protection and popularization of natural values and thus<br />
represent an important source of scientific information from the Balkan region.<br />
The biodiversity of Balkan Peninsula is still the least explored part of Europe.<br />
Therefore, we believe that journals like this one, which originate in this region,<br />
should be committed to present data about our biodiversity to the rest of the<br />
world.<br />
Beside scientific and professional articles, we will also publish short<br />
communications – significant scientific contributions that do not fulfill, in their<br />
entirety, the requirements for a scientific or professional article.<br />
The third component of the Journal is popular science. Your institute or<br />
organization celebrates a jubilee, you want to present the progress of your<br />
project, or photographs of nature research activity ... these are the reasons to<br />
publish popular scientific articles that will be interesting to the scientific<br />
comunity as well as to a broader audience.<br />
»NATURA MONTENEGRINA« is distributed to more than 350 locations<br />
worldwide. Contents of previous volumes and the abstracts of published papers<br />
can be accessed on our website www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm.<br />
You can send your articles to the following e-mail address:<br />
natura@pmcg.cg.yu . The Instructions for Authors are available on our website<br />
and on page 6.<br />
We also welcome scientist interested in refereeing articles sent to our journal.<br />
Marko G. Karaman<br />
Chief Editor<br />
5
Poštovane kolege,<br />
Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> od 2001. godine izdaje naučni i<br />
naučno-popularni časopis “NATURA MONTENEGRINA” - časopis<br />
koji se izdaje u elektronskoj formi, a distribuira u vidu <strong>CD</strong> izdanja.<br />
Na početku postojanja časopis je bio namijenjen, prije svega,<br />
mladom crnogorskom naučnom kadru koji, na počecima svog<br />
naučnog djelovanja, nije imao veliki izbor časopisa za objavljivanje<br />
rezultata.<br />
Nakon šest godina postojanja usmjeravamo se ka novom cilju -<br />
prerastanju u časopis koji će NAUČNIM I STRUČNIM RADOVIMA<br />
IZ OBLASTI PROUČAVANJA, ZAŠTITE I POPULARIZACIJE<br />
PRIRODNIH VRIJEDNOSTI predstavljati značajan izvor informacija<br />
sa područja Balkana. Priroda Balkana je i dalje najslabije proučena u<br />
Evropi. Zato smatramo da upravo časopisi koji nastaju u ovom<br />
regionu treba da ostalom dijelu svijeta iznesu podatke o našoj<br />
prirodi.<br />
Pored naučnih i stručnih radova obraćamo Vam pažnju i na<br />
mogućnost objavljivanja KRATKIH SAOPŠTENJA - naučnih opažanja<br />
iz prirode, dovoljno značajnih da budu objavljena, ali koja ne<br />
ispunjavaju uslove da budu napisana kao naučni ili stručni članak.<br />
Treći segment časopisa je NAUČNO-POPULARNI DIO. Vaša<br />
institucija ili organizacija obiljezava neki jubilej, želite da objavite<br />
tok realizacije nekog projekta, zabilježili ste fotografijom posjetu<br />
nekom lokalitetu ... sve su to razlozi da objavite naučno-popularni<br />
članak - zanimljiv, kako stručnoj tako i laičkoj javnosti.<br />
U toku je odabir recenzenata, kako domaćih tako i inostranih<br />
stručnjaka u odredjenim oblastima prirodnih nauka. Time će kvalitet<br />
časopisa, pored redovnosti koju smo do sada postigli, biti podignuta<br />
na viši nivo. NATURA MONTENEGRINA se distribuira na vise od 350<br />
adresa širom svijeta. Sadržaj dosadasnjih brojeva i rezime radova<br />
mozete pogledati na web stranici:<br />
www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm .<br />
Vaše priloge možete slati na adresu natura@pmcg.cg.yu, a<br />
UPUTSTVO AUTORIMA možete pogledati na stranici 6, kao I na<br />
našem web sajtu.<br />
Nadam se da ćemo saradjivati.<br />
Marko G. Karaman<br />
glavni urednik<br />
6
Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />
CONTENTS:<br />
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6, 2007<br />
EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />
Foreword by editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
Riječ urednika . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />
I Scientific part<br />
BOTANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
. . .<br />
ZOOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />
. . .<br />
BIOCHEMISTRY AND<br />
GENETICS . .<br />
II Short communications . . . .<br />
. . .<br />
I Naučni dio<br />
9 BOTANIKA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
63 ZOOLOGIJA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />
123 BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA . . . . . . . . . . 123<br />
151 II Kratka saopštenja . . . . . . . . . . . . 151<br />
BOTANY:<br />
BOTANIKA:<br />
Rodica BERCU<br />
VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />
Nada BUBANJA, Vladimir STEVANOVIĆ, Dmitar LAKUŠIĆ<br />
Edraianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE) IN MONTENEGRO<br />
Nada BUBANJA, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ<br />
Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN FLORA OF<br />
MONTENEGRO<br />
9-17<br />
19-25<br />
27-30<br />
Rajko T R I P I Ć<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer 31-52<br />
monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />
Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ & Danka PETROVIĆ<br />
THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
ZOOLOGY:<br />
ZOOLOGIJA:<br />
Vera VUKANIĆ<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL DINAMIC OF THE PLANCTONIC<br />
POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />
Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ, Vladimir PEŠIĆ & Aleksandra ZEKOVIĆ<br />
A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE RIVER ZETA<br />
(MONTENEGRO)<br />
Jelena NIKČEVIĆ<br />
THE ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA,<br />
MONTENEGRO<br />
Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ, Tanja VUKOV<br />
MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />
Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ<br />
A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />
53-61<br />
63-71<br />
73-89<br />
91-100<br />
101-109<br />
111-114<br />
Lidija POLOVIĆ, Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ<br />
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN<br />
(MONTENEGRO)<br />
115-122<br />
BIOCHEMISTRY AND GENETICS:<br />
BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA:<br />
Nebojša JOCKOVIĆ, Milica PAVLOVIĆ, Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ and Nada KOVAČEVIĆ<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES: PHENOLIC ACIDS,<br />
FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />
123-129
Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />
Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE OTHER<br />
METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />
Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />
INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
131-136<br />
137-149<br />
II SHORT COMMUNICATIONS:<br />
II KRATKA SAOPŠTENJA:<br />
Vera BIBERDŽIĆ<br />
Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />
Danijela STEŠEVIĆ & Nejc JOGAN<br />
ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort., Setaria viridis (L.) PB.<br />
subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L. AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />
Igor TOMOVIĆ & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ<br />
Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />
151-152<br />
153-160<br />
161-163
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 9-17<br />
VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />
OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />
Rodica B E R C U 1<br />
1 Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural and Agriculture Sciences, “Ovidius” University,<br />
Mamaia Str. 124, 900590, Constantza, <strong>Rom</strong>ania, E-mail: rodicabercu@yahoo.com<br />
Key words:<br />
anatomy,<br />
variation,<br />
vascular system,<br />
estimation,<br />
Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
The paper provides new data regarding the variation of the<br />
vascular system in the vegetative organs of Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />
L. The anatomical structure of the adventitious root<br />
(starting up directly from the underground stem), rhizome (stem)<br />
and the frond’s petiole and rachis exhibit a diarch type root, a<br />
dictyostelic rhizome and an X- and T-shaped petiole and rachis<br />
vascular system up to the subterminal rachis. Based on the variation<br />
of the vascular system in A. trichomanes-ramosum anatomy we<br />
used a mathematical calculation to estimate the number of the<br />
vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. (syn. A. viride Huds.), known as bright<br />
green spleenwort or simple green spleenwort, is a perennial member of family A<br />
spleniaceae. The branching rhizomes are short, creeping to erect, bearing dark brown<br />
to black scales (C i o c a r l a n , 2000). The evergreen compound fronds, simply divided<br />
are tufted at the crown, 4–15 (-20) cm long; persistent to dying in the autumn and<br />
circinnate. The frond’s rachis is green and not winged.<br />
The petioles are often shorter than the blade. The petioles are brownish or<br />
blackish only near the base and green above. It grows in spring and fructifies in<br />
summer. The leaves disappear slowly during the next spring (W a t s o n . &<br />
D a l l w i t z , 2004).<br />
In <strong>Rom</strong>ania it grows in shaded crevices of limestone boulders, cool and moist<br />
places, up to an altitude above 1800m (S a v u l e s c u , 1952). Knowledge on the<br />
variations of the vascular system organization of the fern vegetative organs is quite<br />
limited (O g u r a , 1938, 1972, S c h n e i d e r , 1996), and that of A. trichomanes-
10<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
ramosum L. is almost lacking. The goal of the research was to examine the anatomy<br />
of the adventitious root, rhizome, and frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a<br />
mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />
the fern vegetative organs in accordance with plant morphology, habitat and the<br />
cutting level.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The plant was collected from the Bicaz Gorges in the Carpathians Mountains.<br />
Cross sections of the adventitious root, rhizome and the frond’s petiole and rachis of<br />
A. trichomnaes-ramosum were performed using a rotary microtome. The petiole and<br />
rachis structure were analyzed by serial cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from<br />
the base up to the rachis tip. The samples were stained with alum-carmine and iodine<br />
green and were embedded in Canada balsam. Observations were made with a<br />
BIOROM-T bright field microscope, equipped with a TOPICA-6001A video camera.<br />
The microphotographs were obtained from the video camera through a computer.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Cross sections of the adventitious root revealed that the cortex is composed of<br />
2-3 layers of large parenchyma cells (Fig. 1). The inner cells of the cortex are<br />
modified and have thick walls. Kroemer (1903) has suggested that this wall thickening<br />
is the result of cutinized blade superpositions. Some authors have noticed the<br />
presence of such “curious cells” around the stele and have suggested that this tissue<br />
belonged to the stele naming it “sclerenchymatous mass” (R u s s o w 1872,<br />
B i e r h o r s t 1971) or a “stereomic sheath” (de B a r y 1877, O g u r a 1938, B e r c u<br />
1998, 2006). This configuration has led S c h n e i d e r (1996) to ascribe this type of<br />
root to that of Asplenium. The stele consists of xylem and phloem and is surrounded<br />
by the pericycle (Fig. 1). The xylem vessels are joined together towards the center by<br />
their metaxylem vessels (two for each bundle). The protoxylem vessels (three for each<br />
bundle) are in an exarch position and face the pericycle. The phloem sieve cells,<br />
lacking companion cells, are located on either side of the xylem string. Thus the<br />
adventitious root of A. trichomanes-ramosum has a diarch structure. Remarkable are<br />
the passing cells (Fig. 1).<br />
Cross sections of the rhizome disclosed that the epidermis consists of a single<br />
layer of cells not covered by cuticle (Fig. 2A). Below the epidermis is the cortex,<br />
differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter consisting of<br />
large parenchyma cells. Remarkable is the abundance of starch grains in the cortical<br />
cells and endodermis as well (amiliferous sheath) (Fig. 2B). As O g u r a (1938) and<br />
B i r (1957) reported for Aspleniaceae species, the stele is a dictyostele composed of<br />
a variable number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each<br />
surrounded by its own endodermis (starch sheath) and pericycle. The latter is
11<br />
B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />
composed of parenchyma cells regularly arranged in one row, (locally in two or even<br />
three rows). Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary structure (metaxylem<br />
vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the pericycle). The pith<br />
rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central area of the rhizome<br />
(Fig. 2B).<br />
Fig. 1. Cross section of the adventitious<br />
root, x 206: C- cortex; Mx- metaxylem; Pcpericycle;<br />
Ph- phloem; Px- protoxilem; SSsclerenchyma<br />
sheath.<br />
Fig 2. Cross sections of the rhizome. (A). Portion of the epidermis, cortex and stele, x 160: C-<br />
cortex, E – epidermis, GT – ground tissue, M- meristeles, Pi- pith, PiR- pith ray. (B) A stele<br />
vascular bundle (meristele), x 212: Ed- endodermis, Mx- metaxylem, Pc- pericycle, Ph- phloem, Pxprotoxylem.<br />
Cross section of the petiole base exhibits an epidermis, the cortex differentiated<br />
into an external (sclerenchzmatous) and an inner cortex, followed by a ground tissue.<br />
The vascular system of the leaf petiole base is composed of two meristeles, equal in<br />
size (distele). Each meristele is surrounded by an endodermis and a “special<br />
pericycle” (A n d r e i , 1978). The meristeles are composed of centrally located xylem<br />
elements surrounded by phloem. Protoxylem vessels are in an exarch position<br />
whereas the metaxylem vessels are in the centre. That is attributed to the stele a<br />
hadrocentric and distelic structure (Fig. 3).
12<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Fig. 3 Cross section of the leaf petiole<br />
base, x 83: E- epidermis, GT- ground<br />
tissue, IC- inner cortex, M- meristele,<br />
SC- sclerenchyma cortex.<br />
Fig. 4 Cross section of the leaf petiole (2 cm from the leaf base). (A) General view, x 64: C- cortex,<br />
E- epidermis, St- stele. (B) Portion of epidermis and cortex, x 272: E- epidermis, IC- inner cortex,<br />
SC-sclerenchymatic cortex. (C) The stele vascular bundle, x 266: Ed- endodermis, Pc- pericycle, Phphloem,<br />
Mx- metaxylem, Px- protoxylem.
13<br />
B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />
Transverse sections of the petiole, cut from 2 cm above the leaf base, reveals a<br />
single-layered epidermis, covered by cuticle, a cortex and a centrally located stele<br />
(Fig. 4A). Below the epidermis of the base of the petiole is the sclerenchyma cortex<br />
(hypodermis), which consists of a few layers of compactly arranged sclerenchyma<br />
cells. The hypodermis is internally followed by a region of ground tissue (Fig. 4B). The<br />
stele is monofascicular. The vascular bundle is composed of centrally located xylem<br />
vessels surrounded by phloem. The stele X-shaped xylem elements possesses<br />
themetaxylem vessels in a central position and the protoxylem elements in an exarch<br />
arrangement, surrounded by phloem. That is attributed to the stele a hadrocentric<br />
structure (Fig. 4C).<br />
Cross sections of the rachis cut from 3-8 cm above the leaf petiole disclosed the<br />
same one-layered epidermis composed of cutinized-walled cells, covered by a thick<br />
cuticle, a cortex and a stele. The stele is monofascicular, composed of more or less T-<br />
shaped xylem vessels (meta- and protoxylem vessels) characteristic to most of the<br />
Aspleniaceae species (O g u r a 1972, B i r 1957; B e r c u 2004, 2005). Phloem<br />
surrounds the xylem elements as well (Fig. 5). Toward the subterminal leaf rachis<br />
remarkable is the reduced number of the vascular elements, surrounded by phloem<br />
and embedded in a homogenous mesophyll (Fig. 5A, C). The vascular elements are in<br />
a reduced number because of the veins marginal segments formation. Under the lower<br />
and upper epiderms of the rachis, sclerenchyma cells are present. They provide<br />
mechanical support to the weak and delicate rachis tip. A typical hypodermis is<br />
absent.<br />
Fig. 5 Cross section of the leaf rachis (3-8 cm<br />
above the leaf rachis), x 300.<br />
A. trichomanes-ramosum vegetative organs anatomy exhibits variations in the<br />
vascular system organization. The even and odd number of the vascular bundles<br />
(meristeles) may depend by the plant size, and organs diameter, the plant habitat<br />
ecotope and the cutting level. The mathematical distribution function takes into<br />
account of the ecological parameters such as soil humidity (U), temperature (T) and<br />
soil reaction – pH (R) (Table 1) settled by P o p e s c u and S a n d a (1998). The<br />
distribution function was based on S ă h l e a n u (1957), C e a p o i u (1968), S i r e ţ chi<br />
(1985) and N a s t a s e s c u et al. (1988) works.
14<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
The root (r) – the diameter = 0,1-0,5 mm:<br />
r<br />
N Aspl. t-r . = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 5 ·10 · 3,14 · 0,44 2 30,3954<br />
= = 1,028 ≈ 1 stele<br />
4e h 29,6 29,6<br />
The rhizome (rz) – the diameter = 1-1,5cm:<br />
rz<br />
N Aspl. t-r = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 3 ·10 · 3,14 · 1,26 2 149,55<br />
=<br />
= = 5,06 ≈ 5 meristeles<br />
4e h 29,6 29,6<br />
The rachis (rh) – the diameter = 0,5-1 mm:<br />
pt. base<br />
a. N Aspl. t-r. = 2n K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 2 ·2·10· 3,14 · 0,69 2 = 59,798<br />
4e h 29,6 29,6<br />
= 2,02 ≈ 2 meristeles<br />
rh<br />
b. N Aspl. t-r. = (2n +1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 3 ·10· 3,14 · 0,92 2 = 79,73 = 1,01 ≈ 1 meristele<br />
4e h 4 · 2,71 3 78,732<br />
Where:<br />
r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />
N Aspl. t-r.– the function distribution of the vascular bundles in root (r), rhizome<br />
(rz), petiole base (pt. base) and rachis (rh);<br />
h – the distance (in cm) between two succesive sections;<br />
D – the vegetative organs diameter of the plant (in mm);<br />
e – the natural logarithm base (e = 2, 718);<br />
K (a+b+c) – the ecological constant of the plant depending of: humidity (a),<br />
temperature (b) and soil reaction (c);<br />
n – the multiplication order;<br />
2n – the even number of the vascular bundles;<br />
2n+1 – the odd number of the vascular bundles.<br />
NOTE: it is sufficient the estimation of<br />
r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />
N As t-r.<br />
only for n=1 sau n=2 value.
15<br />
B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />
Table 1: The ecological preferences of A. trichomanes-ramosum<br />
The species<br />
Ecological parameters<br />
humidity<br />
(H)<br />
temperature<br />
(T)<br />
soil reaction<br />
(R)<br />
*The value of the<br />
ecological constant<br />
(K (a+b+c) )<br />
Asplenium<br />
trichomanesramosum<br />
L.<br />
mesohydrophyte<br />
4<br />
microtermous<br />
2<br />
Slightly neutroacidophilous<br />
4<br />
10<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The successive cross sections, cut from the rhizome and the frond’s petiole and<br />
rachis of A. trichomanes-ramosum L. disclose variations in the vascular system<br />
structure. The root is of diarch type. The rhizome is a dictyostele with a variable<br />
number of meristeles due to the number of the foliar traces. The petiole base vascular<br />
system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to the rachis tip<br />
the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to the tip).<br />
These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />
mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />
the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />
main habitat plant factors and the cutting level. The distribution formula can be<br />
extended to other members of this large group of plants.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
A N D R E I , M . (1978): Anatomia plantelor. - Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House,<br />
Bucharest, p. 227-229 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
B E R C U , R . (1998): Anatomical Modifications of the Corm Stele in Fern Asplenium<br />
septentrionale (L.) Hoffm. - Forestry, Sumarstvo, Belgrade 1: 35-40.<br />
B E R C U , R . 2004: Anatomical Aspects of Asplenium adiantum-nigrum L. - J. of Biol. Res.,<br />
vol. 2: 57-61.<br />
B E R C U , R . 2005: Anatomy of Asplenium ruta muraria L. - Studia bot. hung., vol. 36: 16-20.<br />
B E R C U , R . 2006: Histoanatomy of the Vegetative Organs of some Polypodiales species. -<br />
Ex Ponto, Constantza, 232p (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
B I E R H O R S T , D . W . 1971: Morphology of Vascular Plants. Collier - Macmillan Ldt.,<br />
Macmillan Co. London, New York, 296-298, 300-304.<br />
B I R , S . S . 1957: Stelar anatomy of indian Aspleniaceae, Abstract. - Proc. Ind. Sci. Congr.<br />
Association, Calcuta, 44: 232.
16<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
C E A P O I U , N . 1968: Statistics methods applied in agricultural and biological experiences.<br />
- Agro-Silvica Publishing House, Bucharest, p.201-203 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
C I O C Â R L A N , V . 2000: Ilustred Flora of <strong>Rom</strong>ania - Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. II<br />
<strong>edition</strong>, Ceres, Bucharest, p.90-92 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
d e B A R Y , A . 1877: Verigleichende Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Phanerogamen<br />
und Farne. - W. Engelmann, Leipzig, p.238-349 (in German)<br />
K R O E M E R , K. 1903: Wurzelhaut, Hypodermis und Endodermis der Angiospermenwurzel. -<br />
Biblioth. Bot., 12: 151 (in German).<br />
NASTASESCU, C., TENA, M., ANDREI Gh. and OTRASANU, I.<br />
1988: Problems of Algebraical Structures. - Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anian Acad., Bucharest,<br />
p.122-125 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
O G U R A , Y . 1938: Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Pteridophyten. In: Handbuch der<br />
Pflanzeanatomie, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, p.128-140 (in German).<br />
O G U R A , Y . 1972: Comparative Anatomy of Vegetative Organs of Pteridophytes, II <strong>edition</strong>,<br />
Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart, p.313-512.<br />
P O P E S C U , A a n d S A N D A , V . 1998: The Summary of the Spontaneous<br />
Cormophytes from the <strong>Rom</strong>anian Flora. - Acta Bot Horti., Bucharest, p.4-7 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
R U S S O W , E . 1872: Vergleichende Untersuchungen betreffend die Histologie der<br />
vegetativen und sporenbildenden Organe und die Entwicklung der Sporen der Leitbündel-<br />
Kryptogamen. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sc., St. Petersbourg, Sér. VII, 19: 1-207 (in German).<br />
S A V U L E S C U , T . (editor in chief). 1952: Flora Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, vol. 1, Editio Acad.<br />
Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, Bucharest, p.130-133 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />
S C H N E I D E R , H . 1996: The Root Anatomy of Ferns: a Comparative Study. - Pteridology<br />
in Perspective, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, Whitstable, Litho Ltd., Whitstable, Kent:<br />
271-283.<br />
S I R E T C H I , G h . 1985: Differential and Integral Calculation (fundamental notions). -<br />
Enciclopedical and Stiintifical Publisher, Bucharest, p.325-326 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian)<br />
W A T S O N , L . a n d M . J . D A L L W I T Z 2004: The Ferns (Filicopsida) of the British<br />
Isles. - Version: 28th November 2005. http://delta-intkey.com.<br />
Summary<br />
VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />
OF ASPLENIUM TRICHOMANES-RAMOSUM L.<br />
In <strong>Rom</strong>ania Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. grows in shaded crevices of<br />
limestone boulders, cool and moist places, up to an altitude above 1800m. The goal of<br />
the research was to examine the anatomy of the adventitious root, rhizome, and<br />
frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a mathematical distribution function to
17<br />
B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />
estimate the number of the vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs in<br />
accordance with the plant morphology, habitat and the cutting level.<br />
The root, in cross section possesses a primary structure and the stele is a diarh<br />
one. Remarkable is the sclerenchimatous sheet around the stele (Fig. 1).<br />
Cross section of the rhizome discloses a single layered epidermis (Fig. 2A),<br />
cortex, differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter<br />
consisting of large parenchyma cells consisting of numerous starch grains followed by<br />
an amiliferous sheath (Fig. 2B). The stele is a dictyostele composed of a variable<br />
number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each surrounded<br />
by its own endodermis and pericycle. Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary<br />
structure (metaxylem vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the<br />
pericycle). The pith rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central<br />
area of the rhizome(Fig. 2B, C). The frond’s petiole and rachis were analyzed by serial<br />
cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from the base up to the rachis tip. The petiole<br />
base vascular system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to<br />
the rachis tip the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to<br />
the tip). These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />
mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />
the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />
main habitat plant factors and the cutting level.<br />
Received: 26. 11. 2007.
18<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 19-25<br />
EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />
IN MONTENEGRO<br />
Nada BUBANJA 1 , Vladimir S T E V A N O V I Ć 2 , Dmitar L A K U Š I Ć 2<br />
1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica,<br />
Montenegro<br />
2 Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska<br />
43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia<br />
Key words:<br />
Edraianthus dalmaticus,<br />
Budoške bare,<br />
Montenegro,<br />
flora,<br />
distribution,<br />
ecology<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
Taxon Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. was found during<br />
the floristic investigations of wetlands of Budoške bare<br />
(reservoir Vrtac) locality in the vicinity of Nikšić, and it was<br />
the first confirmed record of the this plant species in<br />
Montenegro. Until now seven (sensu lato) or seventeen<br />
(sensu stricto) taxa of genus Edrianthus at the species and<br />
subspecies level has been found in Montenegro. Some<br />
suspicious literature data on presence of Edrianthus<br />
dalmaticus in Montenegro were cited in literature (Janchen<br />
1910, Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). In this paper we also<br />
presented the data about the characteristics of new locality,<br />
habitat and ecological preferences of Edrianthus dalmaticus<br />
A.DC. in Montengro.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Edraianthus dalmaticus<br />
A.DC., Budoške bare,<br />
Crna Gora,<br />
flora,<br />
diverzitet,<br />
ekologija<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC.<br />
(CAMPANULACEAE) U CRNOJ GORI<br />
Tokom florističkih istraživanja na lokalitetu Budoške<br />
bare (akumulacija Vrtac) u okolini Nikšića pronađen je takson<br />
Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. čime je po prvi put zabilježeno i<br />
potvrđeno prisustvo ove biljne vrste u Crnoj Gori. Do sada je<br />
na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> zabilježeno prisustvo 7 (sensu lato)<br />
odnosno 17 taksona (sensu stricto) roda Edrianthus na nivou<br />
vrsta i podvrsta. U starijoj florističkoj literaturi za Crnu Goru<br />
se navode i neki sumnjivi podaci o prisustvu taksona<br />
Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (Janchen 1910, Lakušić 1974,<br />
Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). U ovom radu dati su podaci o<br />
karakteristikama lokaliteta, staništa i ekologiji Edrianthus<br />
dalmaticusa A.DC. u Crnoj Gori.
20<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Genus Edraianthus DC. has its center of distribution in the Balkans and it<br />
represents one of the most prominent groups of endemic plants in this region.<br />
Additional disjunct parts of this group’s range are found in the Apennines, Sicily, and<br />
the Southern Carpathians.<br />
The widespread distribution of Edraianthus in the Balkans, and especially its<br />
high variability and differentiation along latitudinal and altitudinal range, defines it as<br />
one of the rare genera of the Balkan’s flora that was a subject of four monographs<br />
(W e t t s t e i n 1887, B e c k 1893, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974). In the last<br />
monograph and a couple of subsequent papers detailed systematic, phytogeographic<br />
and especially ecological investigations of this genus were provided and a new system<br />
of classification of edraianthoid campanulas was proposed (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987,<br />
1988). Additionally, the family Campanulaceae was segregated by L a k u š i ć (2001)<br />
into a new family, Edraianthaceae, while the genus Edraianthus itself into several new<br />
genera: Protoedraianthus, Visiania, Horvatia, Edraianthus, and Blecicia (Lakušić<br />
1987, 1988, 2001).<br />
According to different authors the genus comprises between 13 (J a n c h e n<br />
1910) and 45 taxa (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989) at the species and subspecies<br />
rank. The most significant recent floristic accounts, Flora Europaea (K u z m a n o v<br />
1976) and Med-Checklist (G r e u t e r et al. 1984), basically accept Janchen΄s concept,<br />
with restriction of number of species and subspecies within the genus between 10<br />
(K u z m a n o v 1976) and 14 (G r e u t e r et al. 1984).<br />
Genus Edraianthus has its center of distribution in the region of Montenegro with<br />
certainly recorded presence of 7 (sensu lato) that is 17 (sensu stricto) taxa at the<br />
species and subspecies rank (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989). From widely<br />
comprehensible and generally accepted taxa on the territory of Montenegro these<br />
ones are present: E. tenuifolius (Waldst. & Kit.) A. DC., E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC.,<br />
E. tarae R. Lakušić, E. serpyllifolius (Vis.) A. DC., E. glisicii Černjavski & Soška,<br />
E. wettsteinii Haláscy & Baldaccii subsp. wettsteinii and E. wettsteinii subsp.<br />
lovcenicus E. Mayer & Blečić. Additionally, these subspecies are present on the<br />
territory of Montenegro E. glisicii subsp. majae R. Lakušić and E. serpyllifolius<br />
subsp. pilosulus (Beck) R. Lakušić, as well as taxa E. jugoslavicus R. Lakušić<br />
subsp. jugoslavicus, E. jugoslavicus subsp. subalpinus R. Lakušić, E. caricinus<br />
Schott, Nyman, & Kotschy, E. montenegrinus Horak, E. vesovicii R. Lakušić and E.<br />
zogovicii R. Lakušić which according to some authors belong to the widely accepted<br />
taxon E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC. sensu lato (J a n c h e n 1910, K u z m a n o v 1976,<br />
G r e u t e r et al. 1984). In order to avoid nomenclature confusion the concept of<br />
unique genus Edraianthus has been used in this supplement.<br />
Except of the aforesaid taxa in older floristic literature, some suspected data<br />
about the presence of the species E. dalmaticus A. DC in Montenegro are mentioned.<br />
The first information on the presence of this species in Montenegro was published by
21<br />
Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />
J a n c h e n (1910: 8) which quotes the information from Reiser’s herbarium in<br />
Sarajevo Museum: “Zweifelhafte Standortangaben: Duga-Pässe in Montenegro<br />
(Reiser, H. Sarajev.)”, giving a commentary on these suspicious data. Lakušić in his<br />
monograph (1974: 17), cited probably the same herbarium specimen, for this species<br />
states “U Dugom polju (Reiser - Herb. SARA)”; However, he has correctly situated this<br />
locality not in Montenegro but in Dugo polje in Herzegovina. The data about the<br />
controversial presence of the species E. dalmaticus in Montenegro were mentioned<br />
by H a y e k (1930), R o h l e n a (1942) and L a k u š i ć (1974). Based on Janchen’s<br />
monograph, Hayek in his "Prodromus" states for this species “In rupibus subalpinis et<br />
alpinis. Da. BH. Mt?” (H a y e k 1930: 561). In addition, Rohlena refering to Baldacci’s<br />
data states ”In humidis silvat. Ad veterem typographiam pr. Rijeka (Ba). Sec. cl.<br />
Hayek dubius” (R o h l e n a 1942: 353). Lastly, a very interesting statement on general<br />
distribution of the species E. dalmaticus can be found in Lakušić’s monograph: ”...<br />
Additionally, there was interfering of materials from quite distant places in some<br />
herbarium sheets, which were probably compared and left in the same sheet, but they<br />
belong to different species, as it is the case with Reiser’s material, which refers to this<br />
species in the surrounding of Rijeka Crnojevića in Montenegro” (L a k u š i ć 1974: 18).<br />
During the recent field investigations and collecting material for floristic study of<br />
wet meadows in surrounding of Nikšić, E. dalmaticus was recorded and confirmed for<br />
the first time in Montenegro.<br />
RESULTS<br />
DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY<br />
The species E. dalmaticus was discovered in the locality Budoške bare<br />
(reservoir Vrtac) which is situated in the S.E. Montenegro that is in the south part of<br />
Nikšićko Polje (Fig. 1, 2). Budoške bare occupies the area of 13,42 km², on the<br />
altitude of 615 m.a.s.l.. To the west part of Budoške bare there is the reservoir Slano,<br />
to its north part it is Kapino polje, to the south there is mountain Budoš and to the east<br />
suburb Straševina. Waters which run through the channel from Slano reservoir and<br />
Krupac reservoir as well as from the Zeta River have the main role in the hidrography<br />
of this region. During the period of haevy precipitations, from October to the end of<br />
May, huge amounts of waters from the channel and the Zeta river form a temporary<br />
reservoir Vrtac which overflows the surrounding meadows. Budoške bare is influenced<br />
by sumediterranean climate. Limnoglacial sediments occupy a wide space in Budoške<br />
bare and they are represented with gravel, sand and clay. Deep, brown, clay-loamy,<br />
lessivage meaedow soils and terrains are dominant in this region.
22<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Fig 1. Herbarium specimen of E. dalmaticus A.DC. – coll. Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare<br />
(42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows, 615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU).
23<br />
Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />
Voucher specimens:<br />
- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />
615 m (Bubanja, N., 14.6.2006, Seed plants collection Natural History Museum of<br />
Montenegro)<br />
- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />
615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU)<br />
Edraianthus dalmaticus is endemic species (Fig. 2) distributed in Croatia<br />
(Dalmatia - Drniš, Dolac, Klis, Mosor, Povilo, Promina, Solin, Knin, Vrlika, Muć),<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina (Duvanjsko polje, Glamočko polje, Livanjsko polje, Drvar-<br />
Drobnjak, Dugo polje, Čaprazlije, Donje Bare, Lištica – Posušje, Podklečani)<br />
(B j e l č i ć , M a y e r 1983, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974, Flora Croatica<br />
Database 2004) and Montenegro (Budoške bare near Nikšić). It could be designated<br />
as dinaric floristic element of adriatic submediterranean province.<br />
Fig. 2. Distribution of<br />
Edraianthus dalmaticus (UTM<br />
Grid zone 34; spot correspond<br />
with basic square10 x 10 km).<br />
Arrow indicate new locality in<br />
Montenegro. ? indicate<br />
suspicious literature data on<br />
presence of E. dalmaticus in<br />
the surrounding of Rijeka<br />
Crnojevića in Montenegro<br />
(Abbreviation: Cro – Croatia,<br />
BH – Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />
Mtg – Montenegro)
24<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
THREAT<br />
According to its endemic distribution, as well as the fact that species inhabits<br />
very fragile periodically flooded karst meadows, it is as a Rare (R) species included in<br />
Global IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants (W a l t e r , G i l l e t t 1998). Also as<br />
European endemics (species for which the total (global) distribution is restricted to<br />
Europe), as well as species included in Global IUCN Red lists, E. dlamaticus is<br />
defined as “target species” or “species of European importance” (O z i n g a ,<br />
S c h a m i n é e 2005).<br />
In addition, E. dalmaticus is defined as highly protected species in Croatia<br />
(Anonymus 2006), as well as in the category DD - data deficient included into Croatian<br />
Red Book (N i k o l i ć , Topić , 2005), while according to Š i l i ć (1996) it has the<br />
status of vulnerable (V) threatened species in Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
ANONYMUS 2006: Pravilnik o proglašavanju divljih svojti zaštićenim i strogo<br />
zaštićenim (16. 1. 2006.), Narodne novine (7), Zagreb.<br />
BECK G. 1893: Die Gattung Hedraeanthus. - Wiener Illustrierte Garten-Zeitung 18:<br />
287-299.<br />
BJELČIĆ, Ž., MAYER, E. 1983: Edraianthus A. DC. - In: Bjelčić, Ž. (ed.), Flora Bosnae<br />
et Hercegovinae. IV Simpetalae. Pars 4: 54-56, Sarajevo, Štamparija Trebinje<br />
188 pp.<br />
Flora Croatica Database 2004: - Botanički zavod, PMF, Sveučilište u Zagrebu,<br />
http://hirc.botanic.hr<br />
GREUTER W. and T. RAUS. 1983: Med-Checklist Notulae, 8. - Willdenovia 13: 277-<br />
288.<br />
HAYEK A. 1930: Prodromus Florae peninsulae Balcanicae 2. Repertorium Speciorum<br />
novarum Regni vegetabilis, Beihefte 30(2): 337-576.<br />
JANCHEN E. 1910: Edraianthus-Arten der Balkanländer. - Mitteilungen des<br />
Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines an der Universität Wien 8: 1-40.<br />
KUZMANOV B. 1976: Edraianthus A. DC. Pp. 99-100 in Flora Europea. Vol. 4,<br />
Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae), eds. Tutin T. G., V. H.<br />
Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A.<br />
Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
LAKUŠIĆ R. 1974: Prirodni sistem populacija vrsta roda Edraianthus DC. Godišnjak<br />
Biološkog Instituta u Sarajevu 26: 1-129.<br />
LAKUŠIĆ R. 2001: Phytodiversity of the Order Campanulales Juss. in Montenegro.<br />
Pp. 70 in Prirodni potencijali kopna, kontinentalnih voda i mora <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> i<br />
njihova zaštita. Plenarni referati i izvodi iz saopštenja sa naučnog skupa,<br />
Žabljak 20 -23. 9. 2001. Book of Abstracts, ed. Regner S. Podgorica: Institut za
25<br />
Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />
biologiju mora Kotor & Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> -<br />
Podgorica.<br />
LOVRIĆ A. Š., RAC, M. 1987: Doprinos fitogeografiji Svilaje i njezina povezanot sa<br />
Biokovom. Acta Biokovica 4: 189-204.<br />
NIKOLIĆ, T., TOPIĆ, J. eds. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Hrvatske. -<br />
Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb. 693pp.<br />
OZINGA, W.A. & SCHAMINÉE, J.H.J. (eds.). 2005: Target Species – Species of<br />
European Concern. A database driven selection of plant and animal species for<br />
the implementation of the Pan European Ecological Network. Wageningen,<br />
Alterra, Alterra-report 1119. 193 pages; 30 figs.; 18 tables; 134 refs.<br />
ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae. - Preslia 20-21: 1-506.<br />
ŠILIĆ, Č. 1996: Spisak biljnih vrsta (Pteridophyta i Spermatophyta) za Crvenu knjigu<br />
Bosna i Hercegovine - Glasnik Zemaljskog <strong>muzej</strong>a Bosne i Hercegovine<br />
(Prirodne nauke), Nov. ser. 31: 323-367.<br />
WALTER, K.S. & H.J. GILLETT (eds.) (1998) 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened<br />
Plants. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. IUCN - The<br />
World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.<br />
WETTSTEIN R. 1887: Monographie der Gattung Hedraeanthus. Denkschr. kais. Akad.<br />
Wissensch. math.-natur. Classe 53: 185-212.<br />
Received: 27. 11. 2007.
26<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 27-30<br />
Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN<br />
FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />
Nada BUBANJA¹, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ ¹<br />
¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro<br />
Кеy words:<br />
Nikšićka Župa,<br />
Montenegro,<br />
taxon<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
During the floristic researches of Niksicka Zupa, a<br />
taxon Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />
Br.- Bl. was found and it was the first time to find this taxon<br />
in Montenegrin flora. The flora of Europe connects the<br />
species Onosma tridentina Wettst. to Italy, but it suspects<br />
that it might have spread out on the territory of ex-<br />
Yugoslavia. Med-Check list, as well as the Flora of Europe,<br />
suspects that this taxon can be found on the territory of ex-<br />
Yugoslavia. In the electronic database of Croatian flora one<br />
can find this taxon under the name Onosma pseudoarenaria<br />
ssp.tridentina (highly protected species), and in that way its<br />
presence has been confirmed on the territory of Croatia. By<br />
this finding the presence of Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />
ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl. on the territory of Montenegro<br />
has been confirmed and it represents the second finding of<br />
this taxon on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Nikšićka Župa,<br />
Crna Gora,<br />
takson<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.-<br />
Bl., NOVI TAKSON U FLORI CRNE GORE<br />
Tokom florističkih istraživanja Nikšićke Župe pronađen<br />
je takson Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />
Br.- Bl. što je prvi nalaz ovog taksona u flori <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Flora<br />
Evrope vrstu Onosma tridentina Wettst. navodi za Italiju, pri<br />
čemu izražava sumnju u njeno rasprostranjenje na teritoriji<br />
bivše Jugoslavije. Med-Check lista kao i Flora Evrope sumnja<br />
u nalaz ovog taksona na području bivše Jugoslavije. U<br />
elektronskoj bazi podataka flore Hrvatske naveden je ovaj<br />
takson kao Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (strogo<br />
zaštićena biljka) čime je potvrđeno njeno prisustvo na<br />
teritoriji Hrvatske. Ovim nalazom potvrđeno je prisustvo<br />
Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />
što je ujedno I drugi nalaz ovog taksona za prostor bivše<br />
Jugoslavije.
28<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Nikšićka Župa is situated in the south-west part of Montenegro. It occupies the<br />
area of 40 km 2 , and with its broader mountain hinterland and brim 210 km 2 . A diversity<br />
of flora and vegetation of this region is caused by the influence of Mediterranean and<br />
continental climate as well as high mountains (Maganik, Stitovo and Prekornica) which<br />
surround Nikšićka Župa. Nikšićka Župa is situated east of Nikšić.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa were carried out in period August, 2000 to<br />
September 2003. The subspecies represented in this paper was collected in June<br />
2002, and the vouchers are entrusted to the collection of Natural History Museum of<br />
Montenegro. The basic literature used for determination of this taxon was: Flora<br />
Europea (L.1972) and Med-Check list (G r e u t e r , B u r d e t & L o n g 1984).<br />
Photographs of the species (fig.1) and habitation (fig.2) where the plant was collected<br />
from are given in this paper .<br />
Fig.1: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />
ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl.
29<br />
Bubanja, Vuksanović: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) . . .<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
During the floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa, a subspecies Onosma<br />
pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl was found. That is the first finding of<br />
this taxon in Montenegro. A small population was recorded on only one locality<br />
(Preserve of King Nikola-Morakovske bare). The plant grows in open, dry and rocky<br />
habitation in beech forest. Genus Onosma L. is represented with 33 species in Flora<br />
of Europe. According to the existing data, these species have been registered on the<br />
territory of Montenegro: O. stellulatum W.K., O. Aucherianum DC. ssp. Javorkae<br />
(SIMK.) HAY., O. arenarium W.K. and O. Visianii CLEM (R o h l e n a 1942).<br />
H a y e k (1924-1933) did not record the presence of this species on the Balkan<br />
Peninsula. Flora Europea as well as Med-Check List mentions this subspecies only for<br />
Italy, doubting upon its spreading on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia. This subspecies<br />
was not recorded in the regional flora of Croatia (D o m a c 1994), whereas in<br />
electronic database of Croatian flora it is recorded as a highly protected species.<br />
Fig.2: Habitation where the plant was collected from.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
A finding of Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- BL. in<br />
Nikšićka Župa clearly confirm its presence in the Balkan Peninsula. In relation to Flora<br />
Europae and Med Check List this record significantly extends the subspecies range<br />
towards the south-east.
30<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
LITERATURE<br />
BUBANJA, N. 2004: Flora vlažnih i vodenih staništa Nikšićke Župe. Specijalistički<br />
rad.Biološki fakultet,Beograd (manuscr.), 86pp.<br />
GREUTER W., BURDET H. M., LONG G., 1984: Med-Check List. Vol. 1., Geneve &<br />
Berlin, 109-110<br />
PIGNATTI S. 1982: Flora d' Italia 2. - Edagricole, 400-402.<br />
PULEVIĆ, V. 2005: Građa za vaskularnu floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Dopuna "Conspectus florae<br />
montenegrinae" J. Rohlene., knjiga 2, Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong><br />
<strong>Gore</strong>, Podgorica, 218pp.<br />
ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrine. -Presila (Praha) 20-21: 254pp.<br />
TUTIN, T.G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V. H.,<br />
MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A., 1993:<br />
Flora Europaea. Vol. 3. - Cambridge, 89-94.<br />
Received: 27. 11. 2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 31-52<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND<br />
SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />
Rajko T R I P I Ć 1)<br />
1)<br />
Republic Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, Podgorica, Trg vojvode Bećir<br />
bega Osmanagića 16, Podgorica, Crna Gora<br />
Кеy words:<br />
Flowering phenology,<br />
sex expression,<br />
Acer monspessulanum<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
The paper contains results of research of flowering<br />
phenology and sex expression of flowers, inflorescences and<br />
individual trees of Acer monspessulanum consecutively for<br />
seven years on 40 marked trees from 2 local populations<br />
near Nikšić. The flowers were morphologically false<br />
bisexually and functionally unisexual (male or female). The<br />
male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil (unfunctional)<br />
with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional<br />
anthers on long filaments). The female flowers had normally<br />
developed pistil and unripe stamens (the anthers are green,<br />
hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short).<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Fenologija cvjetanja,<br />
polna ekspresija,<br />
Acer monspessulanum<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
PRILOG POZNAVANJU FENOLOGIJE CVJETANJA I<br />
POLNE EKSPRESIJE U ACER MONSPESSULANUM L. IZ<br />
CRNE GORE<br />
U radu su dati rezultati istraživanja fenologije cvjetanja<br />
i polne ekspresije cvjetova, cvati i individualnih stabala Acer<br />
monspessulanum uzastopnotokom sedam godina na 40<br />
markiranih stabala iz dvije lokalne populacije blizu Nikšića.<br />
Cvjetovi su bili morfološki lažno dvopolni a funkcionalno<br />
jednopolni (muški ili ženski). Muški cvjetovi su imali vrlo mali,<br />
rudimentarni tučak (nefunkcionalan) sa normalno razvijenim<br />
prašnicima (žuti sa funkcionalnim anterama na dugačkim<br />
filamentima), a ženski cvjetovi su imali dobro razvijen tučak i<br />
nezrele prašnike (sa zelenim, tvrdim i nefunkcionalnim<br />
anterama na vrlo kratkim filamentima).
32<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Morphological and functional variations in the sexuality of Acer flowers were<br />
studied by many explorers. P a x (1885), monographer of Acer genus, said that flowers<br />
of Acer monspessulanum are andro-monoecious. P o j a r k o v a (1933), also<br />
monographer of Acer genus said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male and false<br />
bisexual. Z a m j a t n i n (1958) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male with<br />
stamens and female with pistil and reduced stamens. G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i<br />
(1978) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are functionally unisexual independently<br />
from development of sexual organs of the opposite sex. Male flowers do not have pistil,<br />
and if there is pistil it is reduced and sterile. Female flowers have well-developed<br />
stamens but their anthers do not grow-up, half-anthers do not open and they produce<br />
sterile pollen. P a l a m a r e v (1979) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are<br />
bisexual and unisexual.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Flowering phenology and sexual expression of flowers, inflorescences and trees<br />
of Acer monspessulanum were observed consecutively in period of 7 years on marked<br />
trees (40 trees) in 2 local populations (SUBICA and GREBICE) near NIKŠIĆ. Sexuality<br />
of the flowers was determined on base of their sexual organs functionality. During full<br />
anthesis of the flowers all flowers had normally developed stamens and non-welldeveloped<br />
pistils (rudimentary or abortive pistil) are considered to be male. Criteria for<br />
female flowers is incompetence for releasing pollen, and in case of releasing pollen<br />
such flowers are considered to be bisexual. The criteria for a female flower will be the<br />
inability to release pollen. In case of pollen release, fertile or not, the flowers will be<br />
considered as bisexual. Such the opinion represents contemporary monographer of<br />
Acer genus J o n g (1976). The sexual expression of the inflorescences is determined<br />
on base of classification of inflorescences according to type of their flowering (W i t t r o<br />
c k 1886; modified by C o r r e n s 1928; taken from J o n g 1976) and numeral<br />
relationships between male and female flowers in the inflorescences is observed in<br />
specimen of 30 randomly taken inflorescences for every individual tree and every<br />
specific year of observation. Phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and<br />
flowering were determined according to recommendations (B e j d e m a n 1979).
33<br />
Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
All analysed trees were monoecious plants. The male and female flowers are both<br />
placed on the same inflorescence. The male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil<br />
(unfunctional) with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional anthers on long<br />
filaments). The female flowers had normally developed pistil and unripe stamens (the<br />
anthers are green, hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short). We find similar<br />
results with G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978). T r i p i ć (2006) presented very<br />
similar results for Acer obtusatum Waldst. & Kit.. It is observed, but very rarely (on 5<br />
trees), that during the flowering 1-2 almost normally developed female flowers were<br />
transformed into functionally male flowers with illusory normal pistil but with abortive<br />
ovary. Such flowers are morphological illusory bisexual but in fact they are functionally<br />
unisexual male flowers.<br />
Phenophase of flowering in observed populations begins in time interval from 9 th<br />
March to 14 th April (Stubica) and 25 th March to 13 th April (Grebice) and lasts from 8 to 49<br />
days in population (Stubica) and 27 to 47 days (Grebice), depending on weather<br />
(especially temperature), number of flowering trees and volume of flowering of each<br />
tree (Tab. 2., 3. and Graph. 2., 4.). The end of flowering varied from 8 th April to 5 th May<br />
(Stubica) and 4 th May to 18 th May (Grebice). Massive and rich flowering of trees in this<br />
populations was every the third year (Tab. 2. and Graph. 2., 4.) followed with 2 years of<br />
weak or very little flowering (small number of flowering trees and often very small<br />
number of flowering inflorescences and flowers). The annual flowering rhythmic is very<br />
similar in observed populations while the rhythmic between observed trees was<br />
significantly differentiated (Table 2. and Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.). Individual tree flowered<br />
depending on ecological conditions and richness of flowering from 3 to 28 days (<br />
Stubica) and 2 to 29 days (Grebice) and all analysed trees of observed populations<br />
depending also of ecological conditions, number of flowered trees and volume of<br />
flowering of every tree lasted from 8 to 49 days (Tab. 2., Graph. 1., 2.,3.,4.). Also, for<br />
individual trees it is determined that there is greater or lower variation of duration of<br />
flowering in observed years, depending on ecological conditions and volume of<br />
flowering of that tree (when volume of flowering is low when number of flowering<br />
inflorescences on tree is small than phenophases of such trees starts later and lasts<br />
significantly shorter, and their inflorescences have smaller number of flowering types,<br />
so the tree has at that time narrower sexual expression than in years of rich flowering<br />
(Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.).
34<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Table 1. The phenophases: Swelling of the buds and opening of the buds in observed<br />
populations of Acer monspessulanum L.<br />
Population<br />
Year<br />
Swelling of the buds<br />
Opening of the buds<br />
Start Massive Start Massive<br />
STUBICA<br />
1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
18. 2. – 6. 4.<br />
9.3. – 17. 4.<br />
30. 3. – 19. 4.<br />
14. 2. – 18. 3.<br />
16. 3. – 15. 4.<br />
27. 2. – 18. 4.<br />
21. 2. – 1. 4.<br />
1. 3. – 19. 4.<br />
16. 3. – 22. 4.<br />
15. 4. – 25. 4.<br />
11. 3. – 29. 3.<br />
6. 4. – 25. 4.<br />
16. 3. – 30. 4.<br />
13. 3. - 8. 4.<br />
3. 3. – 13. 4.<br />
24. 3. – 24. 3.<br />
11. 4. – 24. 4.<br />
15. 3. – 7. 4.<br />
26. 3. – 26. 4.<br />
26. 3. – 30. 4.<br />
19. 3. – 6. 4.<br />
12. 3. – 27. 4.<br />
29. 3. – 26. 4.<br />
19. 4. – 29. 4.<br />
19. 3. – 7. 4.<br />
13. 4. – 28. 4.<br />
1. 4. – 3. 5.<br />
23. 3. – 11. 4.<br />
GREBICE<br />
1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
6. 3. – 24. 4.<br />
25. 3. – 26. 4.<br />
2. 4. – 21. 4.<br />
18. 2. – 31. 3.<br />
10. 3. – 13. 4.<br />
6.3.(21.1.)– 22.4.<br />
28. 2. – 29. 3.<br />
20. 3. – 28. 4.<br />
1. 4. – 29. 4.<br />
19. 4. – 30. 4.<br />
11. 3. – 7. 4.<br />
28. 3. – 28. 4.<br />
29. 3. – 2. 5.<br />
20. 3. – 10. 4.<br />
3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />
3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />
10. 4. – 28. 4.<br />
18. 3. – 8. 4.<br />
27. 3. – 27. 4.<br />
8.4.(28.1.)- 28.4.<br />
28. 3. – 11. 4.<br />
7. 4. – 4. 5.<br />
8. 4. – 4. 5.<br />
21. 4. – 3. 5.<br />
25. 3. – 18. 4.<br />
6. 4. – 2. 5.<br />
14. 4. – 5. 5.<br />
30. 3. – 17. 4.<br />
All male flowers of individual trees flowered at lest 2 days and at most 22 days,<br />
and female flowering at least 1 day and at most 11 days (Tab. 3., Graph. 2., 4.). It is<br />
determined that phenophases of flowering of male flowers at all protandrous trees and<br />
at most of protogynous trees it is significantly longer from phenophases of flowering of<br />
female flowers, while such phases at only several protogynous trees has similar period<br />
of lasting or it is phenophases of flowering of female flowers were longer from<br />
phenophases of flowering of male flowers (Graph. 2., 4.). T r i p i ć (2006) presented<br />
very similar results for A. obtusatum while results for A campestre and A. platanoides<br />
(in press) he presented that they had good and very good flowering intensity<br />
consequently for several years followed with one or two years of weak and very weak<br />
flowering. That shows that species which taxonomically belong to the same section<br />
have very similar phenology of flowering while the phenology of flowering to the species<br />
from different sections is different.
35<br />
Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />
Table 2. The phenophase of flowering in the observed populations of Acer<br />
monspessulanum L.<br />
Population<br />
Year<br />
Flowering of the individual trees<br />
Flowering of the observed population<br />
Start Massive The end Start Massive The end<br />
STUBICA 1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003<br />
2004.<br />
9. 3.– 14. 4.<br />
30. 3.–18. 4.<br />
14. 4.–20. 4.<br />
19. 3.–10. 4.<br />
1. 4. – 1. 4.<br />
1. 4. –18. 4.<br />
24. 3. – 9. 4.<br />
14. 3.–16. 4.<br />
1. 4. –10. 4.<br />
- - - - - - - -<br />
21. 3. – 1. 4.<br />
- - - - - - - -<br />
4. 4. –17. 4.<br />
27. 3. – 8. 4.<br />
5. 4. – 26. 4.<br />
8. 4. – 24. 4.<br />
16. 4.–22. 4.<br />
4. 4. – 20. 4.<br />
7. 4. – 8. 4.<br />
20. 4.– 5. 5.<br />
9. 4. – 23. 4.<br />
9. 3.<br />
30. 3.<br />
14. 4.<br />
19. 3.<br />
1. 4.<br />
1. 4.<br />
24. 3.<br />
30. 3.-13. 4.*<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
24. 3. – 13. 4.<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
1. 4. – 17. 4.<br />
26. 4.<br />
24. 4.<br />
22. 4.<br />
20. 4.<br />
8. 4.<br />
5. 5.<br />
23. 4.<br />
GREBICE 1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
4. 4. –25. 4.<br />
6. 4. –27. 4.<br />
13. 4.–28. 4.<br />
25. 3.–19. 4.<br />
2. 4. – 1. 5.<br />
13. 4. – 1. 5.<br />
3. 4. –16. 4.<br />
8. 4. –20. 4.<br />
9. 4. –30. 4.<br />
16. 4.–27. 4.<br />
28. 3.–12. 4.<br />
4. 5. – 4. 5.<br />
16. 4.–28. 4.<br />
6. 4. –18. 4.<br />
14. 4. - 5. 5.<br />
15. 4. – 9. 5.<br />
27. 4.–14. 5.<br />
13. 4. – 5. 5.<br />
19. 4.–18. 5.<br />
22. 4. – 9. 5.<br />
16. 4. – 4. 5.<br />
4. 4.<br />
6. 4.<br />
13. 4.<br />
25. 3.<br />
2. 4.<br />
13. 4.<br />
3. 4.<br />
14. 4.–27. 4.*<br />
14. 4.– 2. 5.*<br />
21. 4.– 3. 5.*<br />
1. 4. – 21. 4.<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
- - - - - - - - -<br />
5. 4. – 25. 4.<br />
5. 5.<br />
9. 5.<br />
14. 5.<br />
5. 5.<br />
18. 5.<br />
9. 5.<br />
4. 5.<br />
Legend: * = semimassive; - - - - = non-flowering<br />
Table 3. The duration of flowering of the observed individual trees and populations of<br />
Acer monspessulanum L. (in days).<br />
Population<br />
Year<br />
The individual tree<br />
Population<br />
All ♂ flowers All ♀ flowers All flowers The observed tree (Total)<br />
STUBICA<br />
1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
3 – 22<br />
4 – 21<br />
2 – 5<br />
2 – 19<br />
3 – 3<br />
4 – 19<br />
6 – 15<br />
2 – 10<br />
1 – 11<br />
1 – 3<br />
2 – 8<br />
3 – 3<br />
1 – 9<br />
2 – 7<br />
6 – 28<br />
5 – 23<br />
3 – 7<br />
3 – 26<br />
7 – 8<br />
8 – 26<br />
12 - 22<br />
49<br />
26<br />
11<br />
33<br />
8<br />
35<br />
31<br />
GREBICE<br />
1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
2 – 18<br />
2 – 20<br />
4 – 17<br />
9 – 24<br />
2 – 14<br />
3 – 11<br />
6 – 18<br />
1 – 9<br />
1 – 8<br />
1 – 7<br />
2 – 14<br />
2 – 5<br />
1 – 8<br />
1 – 10<br />
6 – 28<br />
3 – 29<br />
6 – 23<br />
14 – 28<br />
2 – 20<br />
5 – 22<br />
11 – 25<br />
32<br />
34<br />
32<br />
42<br />
47<br />
27<br />
32
36<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Table 4. Level of flowering (number of flowers on tree) of individual trees of Acer<br />
monspessulanum L. during a year<br />
Population<br />
Year<br />
Level of flowering<br />
N Non-flowering Very low Low Medium High Very high<br />
1998.<br />
20<br />
1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4<br />
6<br />
1999.<br />
20<br />
10<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1<br />
STUBICA<br />
2000.<br />
20<br />
11<br />
6<br />
3<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2001.<br />
20<br />
-<br />
1<br />
1<br />
-<br />
5<br />
13<br />
2002.<br />
20<br />
18<br />
2<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2003.<br />
20<br />
2<br />
6<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
8<br />
2004.<br />
20<br />
-<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
8<br />
9<br />
1998.<br />
20<br />
4<br />
2<br />
3<br />
-<br />
5<br />
6<br />
1999.<br />
20<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
-<br />
7<br />
5<br />
2000.<br />
20<br />
7<br />
1<br />
-<br />
1<br />
4<br />
7<br />
GREBICE<br />
2001.<br />
20<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
11<br />
9<br />
2002.<br />
20<br />
13<br />
4<br />
1<br />
-<br />
2<br />
-<br />
2003.<br />
20<br />
1<br />
8<br />
2<br />
9<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2004.<br />
20<br />
1<br />
4<br />
7<br />
8<br />
Total number of flowers on single inflorescences varied from 3 – 28 (0 – 12 of the<br />
female and 0 – 24 of the male flowers) (Table 5., 6.) . The inflorescences with only<br />
female flowers were very rare (it were found only 2 of such inflorescences), while<br />
inflorescences with only male flowers were very frequent on all trees. Quantitative<br />
relationship of the male and female flowers on the single tree was from 50 %: 50 % (1<br />
tree) to 99.9 % of the male flowers (6 trees) (Table 5., 6.).
37<br />
Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />
Table 5. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />
monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />
Tree<br />
Year<br />
Male flowers Female flowers All flowers in an<br />
inflorescence<br />
Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently<br />
% of ♂<br />
flowers<br />
on tree<br />
1998. 3 16 7 , 8 0 6 1 , 2 5 16 11 , 9 81.0<br />
1 2001. 4 14 8 0 6 2 , 1 6 15 10 84.3<br />
2004. 5 14 7 , 6 0 9 1 , 0 5 18 10 80.0<br />
1998. 6 14 9 0 2 0 6 14 14 , 13 96.3<br />
2 1999. 6 16 9 , 8 0 5 0 , 1 6 16 9 , 10 93.3<br />
2001. 6 13 8 , 7 0 4 0 6 14 8 94.7<br />
2004. 5 14 9 , 8 1 6 0 , 2 6 18 10 , 12 88.9<br />
1998. 4 11 6 , 7 0 6 4 , 5 6 15 8 , 9 70.8<br />
3 2001. 4 13 9 , 12 0 5 4 , 5 5 17 14 , 15 79.6<br />
2004. 6 14 9 , 10 1 7 5 7 20 14 66.7<br />
4 2001. 4 11 7 , 8 0 9 3 , 2 6 18 10 , 11 71.7<br />
2004. 5 13 9 , 7 1 7 3 , 6 8 17 12 66.8<br />
5 2001. 4 13 8 , 6 1 5 1 , 3 6 16 7 , 9 85.1<br />
2004. 3 12 7 , 8 1 7 3 6 17 9 , 7 63.7<br />
6 2004. 4 10 7 1 7 4 6 17 8 , 12 60.2<br />
7 2001. 3 10 6 , 5 1 5 1 , 3 6 15 8 , 9 62.9<br />
2004. 2 7 5 1 6 1 , 5 5 13 7 , 6 63.8<br />
8 2001. 6 16 9 , 13 0 1 0 6 16 9 , 13 99.9<br />
2004. 7 18 12 , 10 0 1 0 7 18 12 , 10 99.99<br />
9 2001. 4 13 6 , 7 0 2 0 4 13 6 , 7 97.3<br />
2004. 4 13 6 0 5 0 5 15 6 92.5<br />
1998. 2 10 5 , 7 0 5 3 , 1 4 14 6 , 9 69.1<br />
10 2001. 3 10 6 , 4 0 6 3 5 13 9 , 7 65.8<br />
2004. 3 10 7 , 6 1 6 4 , 5 6 15 9 , 11 64.1<br />
1998. 5 17 11 , 10 0 2 0 5 17 11 , 10 99.9<br />
11 1999. 6 14 10 , 11 0 4 0 6 14 11 , 10 99.9<br />
2001. 5 14 7 0 3 0 5 14 7 99.99<br />
2004. 5 17 13 , 9 0 3 0 5 17 13 , 9 99.99<br />
1999. 4 15 8 , 11 0 3 0 4 15 8 , 11 99.9<br />
12 2001. 5 14 7 , 6 0 5 0 5 15 7 99.2<br />
2004. 5 21 8 , 11 0 5 0 5 21 8 , 11 99.7<br />
1998. 3 16 9 0 7 5 , 4 8 22 14 , 12 67.6<br />
13 2001. 2 17 9 1 7 5 , 4 7 23 15 , 7 63.8<br />
2004. 6 16 8 , 14 1 7 4 , 6 11 21 14 , 16 72.9<br />
14 2001. 5 14 7 0 2 0 6 14 7 , 8 94.0<br />
1998. 2 8 5 , 3 1 5 2 , 4 4 13 7 , 8 60.4<br />
15 1999. 2 7 3 1 7 1 , 2 4 10 5 , 6 54.6<br />
2001. 2 8 4 , 5 1 5 3 5 12 7 , 8 58.7<br />
2004. 4 10 6 , 7 1 7 5 , 7 5 16 14 58.4<br />
16 2001. 5 15 8 , 9 0 3 0 5 16 8 , 9 90.0<br />
2004. 6 18 10 , 11 0 5 0 7 18 10 , 14 99.3<br />
1998. 3 11 7 0 2 0 4 12 8 99.9<br />
17 2001. 3 12 7 0 3 0 5 13 7 , 8 99.5<br />
2004. 4 15 7 , 10 0 2 0 4 15 7 , 10 99.4<br />
18 2001. 4 12 6 1 5 3 5 14 7 , 10 63.3<br />
2004. 5 14 8 , 9 0 7 5 , 1 8 19 11 , 15 69.2<br />
19 2001. 3 20 5 , 6 0 3 0 4 22 6 , 5 99.99<br />
2004. 6 14 8 , 10 0 4 0 6 14 8 , 10 99.99<br />
1998. 0 14 7 0 5 3 , 2 4 17 9 , 8 69.7<br />
20 2001. 1 10 3 , 4 1 5 5 , 4 5 14 8 , 7 49.4<br />
2004. 4 12 8 1 7 5 , 3 6 18 13 , 12 58.7
38<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Tab. 6. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />
monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />
Tree Year<br />
Male flowers Female flowers Total of number flowers<br />
in inflorescences<br />
% of ♂<br />
flowers<br />
Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently on tree<br />
1999. 4 13 5 and 7 1 7 5 and 3 6 18 11 and 12 66.0<br />
1 2000. 2 15 8 and 9 1 7 3 and 5 5 19 11 and 13 72.4<br />
2001. 3 22 8 and 7 0 7 5 and 3 5 28 12 and 13 69.5<br />
2002. 5 17 8 and 10 0 5 1 and 2 6 19 11 and 10 81.7<br />
2004. 4 15 6 and 11 0 7 5 and 1 5 20 15 70.3<br />
1999. 4 11 7 and 6 1 5 1 and 3 6 14 10 and 7 74.5<br />
2 2001. 4 12 7 0 5 3 5 16 10 75.0<br />
2004. 4 11 6 0 5 2 and 3 7 15 9 69.0<br />
2000. 4 15 9 and 10 1 7 5 and 4 7 18 14 and 12 68.1<br />
3 2001. 3 10 6 and 7 1 6 1 and 4 5 15 9 69.9<br />
2004. 6 15 8 and 12 1 6 2 and 1 7 21 15 and 10 77.7<br />
4 2001. 5 13 6 and 5 0 2 0 5 13 6 and 5 99.99<br />
2004. 6 16 9 and 7 0 1 0 6 16 9 and 7 99.99<br />
2004. 3 8 6 1 5 2 6 14 9 68.5<br />
5 2001. 2 10 4 and 5 1 5 4 and 5 5 14 6 and 8 58.6<br />
2004. 4 10 6 1 5 5 and 3 7 14 11 64.9<br />
1999. 4 12 7 1 6 5 6 17 11 66.0<br />
6 2001. 5 12 7 1 6 3 and 4 7 16 11 and 14 69.0<br />
2004. 4 12 7 and 8 0 5 2 and 0 5 15 8 and 12 77.6<br />
1999. 6 13 8 and 9 0 9 4 and 2 7 19 14 and 12 59.2<br />
7 2001. 6 10 8 and 9 1 8 2 and 5 8 17 13 and 11 68.9<br />
2004. 5 10 7 and 9 0 12 3 and 4 5 20 10 and 13 60.9<br />
2000. 8 22 11 1 5 2 and 4 10 25 13 and 17 81.6<br />
8 2001. 8 20 15 0 7 1 and 4 9 23 18 85.2<br />
2004. 7 24 16 0 6 1 and 3 8 25 18 85.9<br />
1999. 4 16 8 and 10 1 6 1 and 3 5 17 9 78.7<br />
9 2000. 5 13 8 and 9 1 5 2 and 3 7 17 12 and 14 75.6<br />
2001. 3 12 7 and 9 1 5 3 6 16 10 and 11 73.1<br />
10 2001. 6 19 8 0 3 0 8 19 8 and 11 91.1<br />
2004. 7 21 12 0 3 0 7 22 13 and 14 92.7<br />
11 2001. 4 11 7 0 3 0 4 11 7 99.5<br />
2004. 5 11 7 and 8 0 1 0 5 11 7 and 8 99.99<br />
12 2001. 4 14 9 and 6 1 6 4 and 3 7 18 12 and 10 72.0<br />
2004. 5 16 11 1 7 4 and 5 7 21 14 69.9<br />
13 2000. 3 13 7 and 6 1 6 3 and 5 6 18 10 and 12 66.8<br />
2004. 4 12 6 and 8 1 7 1 and 5 5 17 7 and 12 66.3<br />
14 2001. 3 11 6 and 5 0 3 0 3 11 5 and 7 94.1<br />
2004. 5 10 7 0 4 0 and 1 5 13 5 and 8 87.3<br />
2001. 5 17 10 0 6 1 and 2 6 19 13 and 11 78.6<br />
15 2004. 6 20 11 and 7 0 7 1 7 21 13 85.9<br />
1999. 5 13 6 and 8 1 4 1 and 2 6 14 7 and 9 83.7<br />
16 2000. 3 17 12 and 9 1 7 3 and 6 6 20 12 and 16 68.7<br />
2004. 5 21 6 and 14 1 7 1 and 2 6 22 7 and 16 87.8<br />
17 2001. 7 17 12 and 9 0 6 0 and 4 7 17 12 84.7<br />
2004. 7 16 10 0 5 2 and 0 11 18 12 and 14 82.4<br />
1999. 0 15 7 and 10 0 8 0 and 5 6 16 10 and 11 92.4<br />
18 2001. 7 16 11 and 9 0 7 0 and 1 8 17 92.6<br />
2004. 6 18 9 and 11 0 7 1 and 2 7 18 16 and 11 82.8<br />
19<br />
2001. 4 11 6 and 7 1 5 1 and 3 5 15 7 and 10 74.4<br />
2004. 5 12 7 and 11 0 5 1 and 0 7 16 8 and 7 89.0<br />
20 1999. 4 11 7 and 9 0 6 0 and 1 6 16 10 and 8 81.4<br />
2000. 5 12 6 and 8 0 5 0 and 2 6 17 8 and 13 85.6
39<br />
Graph. 1. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the individual<br />
trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />
Year<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6
40<br />
Graph. 1.<br />
Year<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16
41<br />
Year<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
Graph . 1.<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
2004<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
Legend:<br />
20<br />
o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 10.8<br />
- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />
- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />
- phenophase of the flowering
42<br />
Graph. 2. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />
monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />
Year<br />
1998.<br />
1999.<br />
2000.<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12 Non flowered<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4 Non flowered<br />
5 Non flowered<br />
6 Non flowered<br />
7 Non flowered<br />
8 Non flowered<br />
9 Non flowered<br />
10 Non flowered<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15<br />
16 Non flowered<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20 Non flowered<br />
o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4 4 – 7 Non flowered
43<br />
Graph. 2.<br />
Year<br />
2000.<br />
2001.<br />
2002.<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10 Non flowered<br />
11 Non flowered<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15<br />
16 Non flowered<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19 Non flowered<br />
20 Non flowered<br />
o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />
1 Non flowered<br />
2 Non flowered<br />
3 Non flowered<br />
4 Non flowered<br />
5 Non flowered<br />
6 Non flowered<br />
7 Non flowered<br />
8 Non flowered<br />
9 Non flowered<br />
10 Non flowered<br />
11 Non flowered<br />
12 Non flowered<br />
13 Non flowered<br />
14
44<br />
Year<br />
2002.<br />
2003.<br />
2004.<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
Legend:<br />
Graph. 2.<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />
15<br />
16 16 – 20 Non flowered<br />
o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6 Non flowered<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />
- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />
- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers
45<br />
Graph. 3. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the<br />
individual trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />
Year<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9
46<br />
Graph. 3.<br />
Year<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20
47<br />
Year<br />
2003<br />
Graph. 3.<br />
Tree February March April May<br />
10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />
o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
5<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
2004 8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
Legend:<br />
20<br />
o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />
- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />
- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />
- phenophase of the flowering
48<br />
Graph. 4. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />
monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />
Year<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />
o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.1 7.2 11.2 13.3 14.4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11 Non flowered<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15 Non flowered<br />
16<br />
17 Non flowered<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9 15.8<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15 Non flowered<br />
16<br />
17 Non flowered<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4 Non flowered<br />
5 Non flowered<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9
49<br />
Graph. 4<br />
Year<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />
o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />
10<br />
11 Non flowered<br />
12 Non flowered<br />
13<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17 Non flowered<br />
18<br />
19 Non flowered<br />
20<br />
o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7 14.4<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6 15.8<br />
1<br />
2 Non flowered<br />
3<br />
4 Non flowered<br />
5 Non flowered<br />
6<br />
7 Non flowered<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10 Non flowered<br />
11 Non flowered<br />
12 Non flowered<br />
13 Non flowered<br />
14 Non flowered<br />
15 Non flowered<br />
16<br />
17 Non flowered<br />
18 Non flowered<br />
19 Non flowered<br />
20
50<br />
Year<br />
2003<br />
Graph. 4.<br />
Tree<br />
March April May<br />
5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />
o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9 17.8<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
2004<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
20<br />
Legend:<br />
20 Non flowered<br />
o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 12.6 12.3<br />
- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />
- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers
51<br />
Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />
According to G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978) relationship between female<br />
and male flowers in individual trees of A. monspessulanum during a year there are only<br />
or almost female flowers or only or almost male flowers, however, in the next year the<br />
situation was contrary or a proximally equal. Our investigation shown different results –<br />
in each year (in seven years of observing) relationship between female and male<br />
flowers of individual trees was similar (Tab. 5. and 6.).<br />
The flowering of the single tree lasted from 2 – 29 days and of the entire<br />
population from 23 – 59 days (the most frequent 30 – 34 days) depending of the<br />
weather conditions, especially temperature, but also, from number of flowered trees,<br />
richness of flowered trees and numeral relationship of male and female flowers on the<br />
tree (Graph. 2., 4.). Phenophases of flowering of male and female flowers on the same<br />
trees were totally separated in time with 1/2 to 7 days of pause between them. During<br />
phenophases of flowering on individual trees, series of male flowers are shown followed<br />
with series of female flowers (protandrous trees) or when there are series of female<br />
flowers they are followed with series of male flowers (protogynous trees). Very rarely<br />
(in case of very good flowering) on same trees another serie of male flowers (♂ - ♀ -<br />
♂) is shown and also very rerely there is (only with one tree during one year) other<br />
serie of female flowers (♀ - ♂ - ♀ - ♂) during period of flowering.<br />
T r i p i ć (2006) presents very similar results for A. obtusatum but for A.<br />
campestre and A. platanoides he presents results that claim that all trees protandrous<br />
trees always had two series of male flowers (♂ - ♀ - ♂) and all protogynous trees<br />
always had only one serie male flowers and one serie female flowers (♀ - ♂).<br />
Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %) trees<br />
in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />
STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). The same trees<br />
always had protandry or protogyny during all years of observation. These are flowering<br />
types of inflorescences that found: A type (♀) – very rare, B type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D<br />
type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E type (♂) – frequent.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The flowers were morphologically false bisexually and functionally unisexual. The<br />
male flowers had very small (rudimentary) pistil and well-developed stamens (long<br />
filaments and yellow functional anthers), and the female flowers had well-developed<br />
pistil and unripe stamens (green, hard and non-functional anthers on very short<br />
filaments). Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %)<br />
trees in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />
STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). With 19 of<br />
observed trees, during every year of observing, protogyny is established, while 21 trees
52<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
always had protandry. Total number of the flowers in individual inflorescence varies<br />
from 3 - 28 (male flowers 0 - 24 and female flowers 0 - 12). Quantitative relationship of<br />
the male and female flowers on single trees is 49.46 % - 99.99 % of the male flowers.<br />
The flowering types of inflorescence that were found: A type (♀) – very rare, B<br />
type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E (♂)– frequent.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
B E J D E M A N, I. N. 1974: Metodika izučenija fenologiji rastenij i rastitel'nyh<br />
soobšćestv. ANSSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenije, Limnologičeskij Institut, 1-155 pp.<br />
Č A J L A H J A N, M. H. 1988: Reguljacija cvetenija vysših rastenij. AN SSSR,<br />
''Nauka'', Moskva, 3-559 pp.<br />
C H A I L A K H Y A N, M. KH., K H R I A N I N, V. N. 1982: Sex of plants and its<br />
hormonal regulation. AN SSSR, ''Nauka'', Moskva.<br />
G U D E S K I, A. & D R E N K O V S K I, R. 1978: Morfologija i pol na cvetovite kaj<br />
nekoi vidovi od rodot Acer L. Godišen zbornik na Šumarskiot fakultet na<br />
Univerzitet vo Skopje, knj. 28: 6-24 (1977/78), Skopje.<br />
J O N G, P. C. De 1976: Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. Mededelingen,<br />
Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, Nederland, 76-2.<br />
P A L A M A R E V, E. 1979: Acer L. In: Flora na Narodna Republika B’lgarija, VII: 221<br />
– 240, Izdatelstvo na B’lgarskata Akademija na naukite, Sofija,<br />
P A X, F. 1885: Monographie der Gattung Acer L. Engler's botanischen Jahrbüchern,<br />
Band VII, Heft 2: 177- 263, Leipzig.<br />
P A X, F. 1902: Aceraceae. In: A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich IV, 163, 8: 1-89, Leipzig.<br />
P O J A R K O V A, A. I. 1933: Botaniko-geografičeskij obzor klenov SSSR v svjazi s<br />
istoriej vsego roda Acer L. Trudy Botaničeskogo instituta AN SSSR, Ser. I: 225-<br />
374, Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Leningrad.<br />
T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer obtusatum<br />
Waldst. & Kit. from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 15-24, Natural History<br />
Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />
T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer campestre L.<br />
from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 25-36, Natural History Museum of<br />
Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />
T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Contribution to the knowledge of flowering phenology and sex<br />
expression in Acer platanoides L. from Montenegro. (In press).<br />
Z A M J A T N I N, B. N. 1958: Acer L. In: Derev’ja i kustarniki SSSR, IV: 405 – 499,<br />
Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moskva – Leningrad.<br />
Received: 25. 12. 2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:53-61<br />
THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
Snežana V U K S A N O V I Ć 1 & Danka PETROVIĆ 2<br />
1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg vojvode Bećir bega Osmanagića 7, Podgorica; Montenegro,<br />
E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu; vukss@cg.yu<br />
2 The University of Montenegro Faculty of science, Department of Biology, Cetinjski put b.b., Podgorica;<br />
Montenegro, E-mail: danka.petrovic@cg.yu<br />
Кеy words:<br />
Ulcinj Salts,<br />
taxon,<br />
flora,<br />
vegetation types,<br />
species,<br />
habitats<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Ulcinjska Solana,<br />
takson,<br />
vegetacijski tipovi,<br />
vrste,<br />
stanista (habitati)<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
The results two years’ research of flora and vegetation<br />
of Ulcinj Salts have been presented in this paper. A rare<br />
taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima noted until now in flora of<br />
Montenegro only at one locality, was found. The paper<br />
consists of a review of vegetation types present in the Salt<br />
Works with a list of species which form them. A table with<br />
names of species and habitats they inhabit has also been<br />
presented.<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
FLORA I VEGETACIJA ULCINJSKE SOLANE<br />
U radu su predstavljeni rezultati istraživanja flore i<br />
vegetacije ulcinjske Solane tokom dvije godine. Pronađen je<br />
rijetki takson Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima koji se u flori <strong>Crne</strong><br />
<strong>Gore</strong> bilježi još na samo jednom lokalitetu. U radu je dat<br />
pregled tipova vegetacije prisutnih na prostoru Solane uz<br />
spisak vrsta koje ih izgrađuju. Na kraju je predstavljena<br />
tabela sa imenima vrsta i habitata koje naseljavaju.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Ulcinj Salt Works are located in the far south of Montenegro. Built in the<br />
region with the biggest number of sunny days, the greatest insolation and the biggest<br />
number of tropical days in the former SFRY (M i c e v et all, 1995), they occupy around<br />
15 km 2 of salt pools. In the past, at the area of today’s salt pans there was Zoganjsko<br />
blato (mud), swamp with brackish water, which started assuming anthropogenic<br />
infrastructural form by end thirties of the century before last (H a d ž i b r a h i m o v i ć ,
54<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
2002). Today, these are artificial, men-directed ecosystems, where the time for filling<br />
the pools with the sea water, the level of water therein and water salinity are set in<br />
advance. The immediate vicinity of the sea, the Bojana River, Šasko Lake, Velipolje in<br />
Albania, and of the Lake of Skadar, makes this “Cultural Laguna”, as V a s i ć called it<br />
(1989), very interesting for ornithology and the science in general.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The investigations of flora and vegetation of Salt Works, presented in this<br />
paper, were carried out in 2003 and 2004. During the first year, only one field visit<br />
was made (June), while in 2004 field visits were taking place during the entire<br />
vegetation season (March-October). The material collected on the filed was<br />
subsequently determined, put into herbaria and deposited with the Natural History<br />
Museum of Montenegro. The borders of vegetation entities were recorded and the<br />
alteration thereof depending on the time of year and the water level in the basins was<br />
monitored. The paper includes an overview of the types of vegetation present in the<br />
area of Salt Pans along with a list of species that make up these types of vegetation.<br />
HALOPHYLOUS VEGETATION<br />
Grounds with a large quantity of salt are unfavourable for plant life, and thus<br />
they are inhabited only with the species that are specifically adapted to cruel living<br />
conditions in these habitats. Such plants, known as halophytes, form floristically poor,<br />
but very interesting plant cover. Typical or genuine halophytes or euhalophytes can be<br />
found in the habitats with high salinity degree and significant moistness. Their<br />
communities present a predominant type of vegetation in the Salt Works. They were<br />
found on the muddy-clayish boundary places of the pools, Lake I, Lake II, canals, as<br />
well as on the embankments. They partially have an emerged character, i.e. they<br />
inhabit shallow waters. The zonation of halophytic vegetation in the Salt Works is inter<br />
alia determined by the composition of canals and embankments.<br />
The association of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev., is developed on<br />
very salty and constantly flooded sites, and some associations are located in shallow<br />
waters. The species Salicornia herbacea L. is predominating species of this<br />
community. In addition to this taxon, the association is dominated by Sueda maritima<br />
Dum, while less numerous are the species Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen<br />
and Atriplex portulacoides L. As accompanying species there appear Salsola soda L.<br />
and Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC. The community emerges in the month of May,<br />
and right before the end of summer and in autumn, when Salicornia blossoms and<br />
gets a characteristic red colour, the community reaches the peak of its development.<br />
The community of Arthrocnemetum fruticosi Br. – Bl., which appears on the salt<br />
grounds very often in combination with the community of Salicornietum herbaceae<br />
Jank. & Stev., is present only in fragments on the Salt Works. It develops at
55<br />
Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
somewhat distant, always flooded and very salty places. It is of the same floristic<br />
composition, but there is a difference in the level of presence of certain species.<br />
These two communities are at some places mosaically combined. In the dry and less<br />
salty areas the characteristic species in the community is Limonium angustifolium<br />
(Tausch) Degen.<br />
The best developed species of euhalophyta are located in the beginning zone<br />
of the lake I (in the vicinity of blue houses). These are real meadows on which one<br />
can notice two zones of halophytic vegetation. The first one, developed along the<br />
water, is made up of the community of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev .<br />
Going toward the dams and canal, the second, more complexly built halophytic zone,<br />
appears. It is formed by constituents of diverse floristic composition, which alternate<br />
mosaically among each other. These are: pure constituents of the species Limonium<br />
angustifolium (Tausch) Degen; constituents wherein along with Limonium<br />
angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear: Atriplex portulacoides L., Sueda maritime Dum.<br />
and Carex sp.; the dominant species Sueda maritima Dum. and Carex sp; constituents<br />
wherein Sueda maritime Dum. and Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear<br />
along Carex sp.,; pure constituens of Carex sp. As accompanying species there<br />
appear: Spergularia salina Presl, Plantago coronopus L. and Coronopus squamatus<br />
(Forsskal) Asch.<br />
In the remaining parts of the Salt Works (Lake II, First Evaporation, pools of<br />
Zoganj, Second Evaporation, dams) there are also two halophytic zones wherein the<br />
euhalophytic vegetation is dispersed in the same way, although it is less developed. In<br />
the crystallisation basins and along the margins of the canal we find individual<br />
specimens, which do not form communities.<br />
Going further from the water, the terrain rises (soil becomes deeper), salinity<br />
and humidity of the ground decrease. In this area the dominant species become those<br />
which appear in the second zone of the halophytic vegetation as accompanying<br />
species (Spergularia salina Presl., Plantago coronopus L. i Coronopus squamatus<br />
(Forsskal) Asch). This type of vegetation is best developed during April and in the<br />
beginning of May, when dominant species blossom. By the passing of the vegetation<br />
season, there start to emerge the elements of meadow and ruderal vegetation which<br />
become the dominant ones.<br />
On the dams, which divide the basins, the species Inula crithmoides L., an<br />
important element of halophytic vegetation, appears.<br />
MEADOW VEGETATION<br />
The communities of meadow flora spread in deeper layers of the ground with<br />
less salinity. Meadow type of vegetation exists on the raised land along the channel<br />
leading to Lake I. On the meadow, different aspects change each other during the<br />
vegetation season. During March geophyte are predominant, such as: Narcissus<br />
tazetta L., <strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast. & Mauri, Hyacinthus orientalis L. and<br />
Ornithogalum sp. Later, the following species dominate in the meadow: Avena barbata
56<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Pott ex Link, Dactylis glomerata L., Phragmites comunis Trin., Carex sp., and during<br />
the autumn Limonium angustifolium L. is also present. The facies with dominant<br />
species Trifolium nigricens Viv. exists only in fragments. Accompanying elements of<br />
such communities are Anemone hortensis L., Anagalis arvensis L., Bellis perennis L.,<br />
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton, Echium vulgare L., Silene gallica L. etc.<br />
In the central part of meadow situated between First evaporation and pools of<br />
Zoganj, typical meadow vegetation is developed during the spring, with dominating<br />
species: Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link, Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />
Haywood, Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl., Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.)<br />
Fritsch etc. But, in autumn, at the same space, predominant species is Limonium<br />
angustifolium (Tausch) Degen. The community with distinctive taxon Juncus acutus L.<br />
cover the rest of meadow. Like the first-mentioned meadow the same geophyte are<br />
developed in March, and here are noted the represents of family Orchidaceae: Orchis<br />
laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L., and S. vomeracea (Burm) Briq.<br />
REEDS<br />
Under natural conditions, the reeds reach Phragmites communis Trin. Its most<br />
intesive development is on swampy, boggy and peat-boggy soils with a sufficient<br />
water layer above the soil surface 60-80 cm. On dry or drying-up habitats the reed can<br />
only develop if the ground water level is high (not deeper than 3-4 cm below the<br />
surface)(N i k o l a j e v s k i j , V. G. 1971.).<br />
Uniform constituents of reed by Phragmition communis W. Koch are located in<br />
pools and canals, in places, formed the islands that raised above the water. Specially,<br />
constituens of reed are well developed in area of Second evaporation. We believe that<br />
reed will continue to expand and occupy new water surface areas. This species is<br />
present as an accompanying element in the vegetation of wet meadows as well.<br />
In muddy coastal area, the community Juncetum maritime-acuti Hić. exists<br />
only in fragments. The component species of such community are Juncus acutus L.<br />
and J. maritimus Lam. Individual trees of taxon Tamarix africana Poiret can also<br />
frequently be found.<br />
RUDERAL VEGETATION<br />
Ruderal plants belong to a widespread type of vegetation inhabiting areas<br />
exposed to the intensive human influence. They can be found in the areas of<br />
permanent or temporary settlements of people and domestic animals, around roads,<br />
railroads, embankments … On the land around Salt-Work, ruderal vegetation is<br />
present along the whole road, on embankments along the railroad, and the elements<br />
of this flora are mixed with halophytes vegetation and on the embankments separating<br />
individual basins.
57<br />
Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
The communities of halophyte plants are floristically poor, but ecologically very<br />
interesting, these plants are specifically adapted to cruel living conditions at their<br />
habitats. Development of tourism and strong urbanization in coastal part of<br />
Montenegro, cause for disappearing of several habitats of this type of vegetation<br />
(Topolica-Bar, Igalo). Preserved and not fragmentary communities of typical<br />
halophytes exist only on land around the Salt Works in Ulcinj and Tivatsko polje.<br />
Because that, Salt Works in Ulcinj are very important for preservation of these<br />
communities.<br />
Among the plants growing on Salt Works, Ophrys bertolonii Moretti, species<br />
from family Orchidaceae, is particularly interesting and important, and it is protected in<br />
Montenegro. Many representatives of this family are included in Red Lists in most of<br />
the countries of Europe, and there are some suggestions to protect them also in<br />
Montenegro.<br />
It is very important to mention the species of this family that are presented in the<br />
meadow flora on Salt Works, such as: Orchis laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L.i S.<br />
vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu..<br />
The finding concerning the subspecies Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime, up to now<br />
has been noted only at one locality (A d a m o v i c 1913, sand betwen Bar and Ulcinj).<br />
We consider that the most important sites of Salt Works regarding the flora and<br />
vegetation are localities with the best developed belt of halophyte and where we found<br />
the most interesting plants (species). The best development stands of euhalophyte are<br />
located by the Lake I, as well as on the embankment that separates Lake I from Lake<br />
II. The taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime was found on this embankment, too, so we<br />
believe that area should be preserved from any intervention intended for the<br />
rehabilitation of Salt Works. On meadow situated between First evaporation and pools<br />
of Zoganj we found mentioned representatives of family Orchidaceae, and taxon<br />
Ophrys bertolonii Moretti was noted at the beginning of the path that separates<br />
Knete from Lake II.<br />
Therefore these localities should not be subjected to any interventions regarding<br />
the rehabilitation of Salt-Works.<br />
Domination of ruderal vegetation on Salt Works (except ground with large<br />
quantity of salt) shows that there is a strong influence of man and cattle. But<br />
halophyte vegetation is not exposed to grazing, because the cattle avoid plants with<br />
high contents of salt.<br />
SPECISMENS<br />
Ajuga chamaepitys (L.) Schreb<br />
Alkana tinctoria (L.) Tausch<br />
Anemone hortensis L.<br />
Anagalis arvensis L.<br />
Anchusa officinalis L.<br />
HABITAT<br />
near road, meadow<br />
near road<br />
near road, meadow<br />
near road, meadow<br />
meadow
58<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Anthemis arvensis L.<br />
near road<br />
Aristolochia rotunda L.<br />
embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />
Arum maculatum L.<br />
meadow<br />
Asphodelus microcarpus Viv.<br />
near pools of Zoganj<br />
Aster tripolium L.<br />
embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />
Atriplex portulacoides L.<br />
around lake I, embankments<br />
Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC.<br />
around lake I, embankments<br />
Avena barbata Pott ex Link<br />
meadow near lake I<br />
Bellis perennis L<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima<br />
embankment between lake I and lake II<br />
Bidens tripartita L.<br />
near road, embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />
Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton<br />
near road, meadow near lake I<br />
Blackstonia perfoliata (L.) Huds<br />
embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />
Calepina irregularis (Asso) Thell<br />
near road, meadow near lake I<br />
Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus<br />
near road, meadow near lake I<br />
Cardamine hirsuta L.<br />
near road, meadow near lake I<br />
Carex sp.<br />
meadow<br />
Centaurea alba L.<br />
embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />
C. calcitrapa L. near road<br />
C. solstitialis L. near road<br />
Centaurium erythraea Rafn.<br />
meadow<br />
Cichorium intybus L<br />
near road<br />
Cirsium arvensis (L.) Scop<br />
near road, embankments<br />
Clematis viticella L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Clinopodium vulgare L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Convolvulus arvensis L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Coronopus squamatus (Forsskal) Asch. raised land near lake I<br />
Cynoglossum creticum Miller<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Dactylis glomerata L.<br />
meadow near lake I<br />
Daucus carota L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Delphinium peregrinum L.<br />
near road above lake I<br />
Ditrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter<br />
near road, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Dorycnium hirsutum (L.) Ser.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Echium vulgare L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Epilobium hirsutum L.<br />
near canal behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her<br />
near road<br />
E. malacoides (L.) L’Her near road<br />
Eryngium amethistinum L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Eupatorium cannabinum L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Euphorbia helioscopia L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
E. peplis L. near canal along lake I
59<br />
Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
E. peplus L. near road<br />
E. terracina L. near road toward Kneta<br />
E. seguieriana Necker near road toward Kneta<br />
Filago vulgaris Lam.<br />
near road<br />
Geranium columbinum L.<br />
near road<br />
G. dissectum L. near road<br />
G. robertianum L. near road, meadow<br />
G. brutim Gasparr. meadow<br />
Hyacinthus orientalis L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Helichrysum italicum (Roth.) G. Don<br />
near road<br />
Heliotropium europaeum L.<br />
near road, embankments<br />
Hordeum vulgare L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Hypericum perforatum L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Inula brittanica L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
I. crithmoides L. embankments<br />
Juncus acutus L.<br />
muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />
J. maritimus Lam. muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />
Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.) meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Fritisch<br />
Lamium purpureum L.<br />
near road<br />
Lathyrus cicera L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen near pools, canals, on medow<br />
Linaria vulgaris Miller<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Linum nodiflorum L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
L. usitatissimum L. meadow<br />
Lotus corniculatus L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Medicago minima (L.) L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas<br />
embankment, near road<br />
Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl.<br />
meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Muscari comosum (L.) Miller<br />
meadow, embankment between lake I and lake II<br />
Narcissus tazetta L.<br />
meadow<br />
Nigella damascena L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Ophrys bertolonii Moretti<br />
road between first evaporation and Kneta<br />
Orchis laxiflora Lam.<br />
meadow<br />
Ornithogalum sp.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Oxalis corniculata L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Parentucellia latifolia (L.)Caruel<br />
meadow<br />
Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />
near road, meadow<br />
Heywood<br />
Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link.<br />
meadow<br />
Phragmites communis Trin<br />
pools, canals, humid medow<br />
Picris hieracioides L<br />
near road<br />
Plantago coronopus L.<br />
raised salt land
60<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
P. lanceolata L. near road<br />
P. major L. near road<br />
Polygonum aviculare L.<br />
along the road, embankment<br />
Portulaca oleracea L.<br />
embankment between lake I and lake II<br />
Prunella laciniata (L.) L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
P. vulgaris L. near road, meadow<br />
Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Reseda phyteuma L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
<strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast.& Mauri near road, meadow<br />
Rosa canina L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road<br />
toward Kneta<br />
Rubus idaeus L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
Salicornia herbacea L.<br />
salt, humid places<br />
Salsola soda L.<br />
salt, humid places<br />
Salvia verbenaca L.<br />
near road, meadow<br />
S. verticillata L. near road, meadow<br />
Scandix pectin-veneris L.<br />
near road<br />
Scolymus hispanicus L.<br />
near road, embankments<br />
Senecio rupestris Waldst. & Kit.<br />
near road<br />
Serapias lingua L.<br />
meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />
Zoganj<br />
S. vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu. meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />
Zoganj<br />
Sherardia arvensis L.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Silene conica L.<br />
meadow<br />
Silene gallica L.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Silene nocturna L.<br />
meadow<br />
Solanum nigrum L.<br />
embankments, near road<br />
Sonchus arvensis L.<br />
near road<br />
Spergularia salina<br />
raised salt land<br />
Stellaria media (L.) Vill.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Suaeda maritime Dum.<br />
salt, humid places<br />
Tamarix africana Poir.<br />
humid medow<br />
Taraxacum officinale Weber<br />
meadow<br />
Teucrium chamaedrys L.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Trifolium campestre Schreber<br />
meadow, near road<br />
T. incarnatum L. meadow<br />
T. nigricens Viv. meadow, near road<br />
T. resupinatum L. meadow<br />
T. subterraneum L. meadow<br />
Trigonella esculenta Willd.<br />
near road<br />
Verbascum sinuatum L.<br />
near road<br />
Verbena officinalis L.<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road
61<br />
Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />
Veronica arvensis L.<br />
meadow<br />
V. chamaedrys L. meadow, near road<br />
Vicia grandiflora Scop.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Vicia sativa L. subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh.<br />
meadow, near road<br />
Vincetoxucum hirundinaria Medicus<br />
embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />
LITERATURE<br />
D O M A C , R. 1967: Ekskurzijska flora Hrvtske i susjednih područja. - Institut za<br />
botaniku sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Zagreb, 543pp.<br />
JANKOVIĆ , M., S T E V A N O V I Ć , V. 1983: Prilog poznavanju slatinske vegetacije<br />
Boke Kotorske. - Zbornik Roberta Visianija Šibenčanina, Muzej grada Šibenika<br />
10:377-396<br />
HORVATIĆ , S. 1934: Flora i vegetacija otoka Paga. - Prir. istraž. Jugosl. Akad. znan. i<br />
umjetnosti, Zagreb. 19: 116-372.<br />
HORVATIĆ , S. 1963: Vegetacijska karta otoka Paga s općim pregledom<br />
vegetacijskih jedinica Hrvatskog primorja. Prir. istraz., Acta Biol. IV/33: 5 - 187.<br />
JAZU, Zagreb<br />
J A V O R K A , S., C S A P O D Y , V. 1934: Iconographia florae Hungaricae, Budapest.<br />
576 pp.<br />
K A R A M A N , V. 1997: Flora istočnog dijela Bokokotorskog zaliva. Magistarski rad. - Biološki<br />
fakultet, Beograd ( manuscr.). 186 pp.<br />
NIKOLAJEVSKIJ, V. G. 1971: Research into the Biology of the Common Reed<br />
(Phragmites communis Trin.) in the U.S.S.R. - Folia-geobotanica Phytotaxonomica<br />
6/2: 221 – 230. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha.<br />
P A R O L L Y , G. 1992: Die Orchideenflora Montenegros. - AHO Mitteilungsblatt,<br />
Baden Wuertenberg 24 (2): 141 -391<br />
P I G N A T T I , S. 1982: Flora d' Italia. 1-3. - Edagricole, Bologna<br />
PULEVIĆ , V. 2005: Građa za floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. - Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode,<br />
Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />
R O H L E N A , J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrinae 20-21: 1-506.- Preslia,<br />
Praha.<br />
T U T I N , T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE, D. H.,<br />
WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964-1980: Flora Europaea 1-5<br />
Cambridge.<br />
T U T I N , T. G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V.<br />
H., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A. 1993:<br />
Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. - Sec. ed. Cambridge. 581pp.<br />
Received: 24. 11. 2007.
62<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:63-71<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL<br />
DYNAMICS OF THE PLANCTONIC POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />
Vera VUKANIĆ 1<br />
1<br />
Faculty of Technical Science, Departmant of Technics, Chemistry and Biology, The University of Novi<br />
Pazar, Vuka Karadzica bb, Novi Pazar, Serbia; v_vukanic@yahoo.com<br />
Key words:<br />
polycheta,<br />
Tomopteris elegans,<br />
Adriatic,<br />
Bay of Boka Kotorska,<br />
distribution<br />
Synopsis<br />
This paper presents the first data about seasonal<br />
overveiw of horisontal distribution and abundance for the<br />
genus Polycheta in Bay of Boka Kotorska. The only<br />
determined species was Tomopteris elegans Chun, which is<br />
present throughout the Adriatic Sea, but as it has a quite<br />
narrow ecological valence its abundance is much greater in<br />
deep open waters of the Adriatic than in the coastal waters.<br />
Also presented are seasonal oscillations and quantitative<br />
presence of Polycheta population during 2002.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Polycheta,<br />
Tomoperis elegans,<br />
Jadran,<br />
Bokokotorski zaliv,<br />
distribucija<br />
Sinopsis<br />
PRILOG POZNAVANJU DISTRIBUCIJE I SEZONSKE<br />
DINAMIKE PLANKTONSKIH POLIHETA U JUŽNOM<br />
JADRANU<br />
U radu iznosimo prve pregledne podatke o sezonskoj<br />
horizontalnoj distribuciji i abundanciji roda Polycheta u<br />
Bokokotorskom zalivu. Determinisana je samo vrsta<br />
Tomopteris elegans Chun, koja je prisutna u cijelom Jadranu.<br />
Ova vrsta ima prilično usku ekološku valencu, tako da ima<br />
mnogo veću abundanciju u pučinskim dubokim vodama<br />
Jadrana nego u priobalnim vodama. Takođe smo prikazali<br />
sezonske oscilacije i kvantitativno prisustvo cijele grupe<br />
Polycheta tokom 2002. godine.
64<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Geographic position and specific ecological conditions make Bay of Boka Kotorska<br />
a distinct biotope. The interactive relationships of its wildlife are influenced by influx of<br />
freshwater from the mainland as well as the currents from the open sea. Therefore, we<br />
tried to use the data collected in one-year cycle of study in order to determine the<br />
main regularities in oscillations of ecological parameters, important for fluctuations in<br />
diversity of Polycheta biocenosis. Research on pelagic polychaetes in Adriatic had<br />
started alredy in the 19 centry. The first data were collected in Northern Adriatic<br />
(B u s c h , 1851; V e j d o v s k i , 1876; A p s t e i n , 1893; B a l d a s s e r o n i , 1914) and<br />
Otrant strata (R o s a , 1912). Data for eastern coast and South Adriatic are mentioned<br />
only in recent times (K n e ž e v i ć , 1942; G a m u l i n , 1948, 1979; H u r e , 1961;<br />
Vukanić ,D., 1975.; B a t i s t i ć et al. 2004; V u k a n i ć ,V., 2004). H u r e (1961) cited<br />
the following species for the open waters of South Adriatic: Loperorhynchus<br />
uncinatus, Alciopa cantrainii, Vanadis formosa, Tomopteris helgolandica, Tomopteris<br />
elegans. Tomopteris elegans is the most common Adriatic species cited by H u r e<br />
(1955). V u k a n i ć ,D. (1975) presented data on participation of polychaetes in total<br />
zooplankton of coastal waters of open South Adriatic with 0.80% and at 6 NM off the<br />
shore with 0.17%. G a m u l i n (1979) cited the species recorded by Zei in 1956:<br />
Tomopteris elegans, T. helgolandica, Alciope contrainii, Vanadis formosa and V.<br />
crystallina. Batistić et al. (2004) when discussing material collected on a cruise<br />
from April 1993 to February 1994, cited the following species for the South Adriatic:<br />
Tomopteris elegans, Callizonella lepidota, Callizona nasuta, Pelagobia longicirrata,<br />
Sagitella kowalevskii, Travisiopsis lanceolata i Typhloscolex muelleri.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHOD<br />
Study area - Boka Kotorska Bay is situated in the southeastern part of Adriatic.<br />
Its geographical position is determined by key points: 42º31'N, 42º23'32''S,<br />
18º46'32''E and 18º30'29W. It penetrates into the mainland for 28 km and is composed<br />
of four interconnected bays: Herceg Novi Bay (which directly communicates with the<br />
open sea), Tivat Bay, as well as the inner bays, Risan and Kotor. The surrounding<br />
mainland is a karstic area, arid during summer, while in autumn, winter and early<br />
spring it has the most plentiful precipitation in Europe (6000 mm). Boka Kotorska Bay<br />
is under a strong influence of waters from deep southern Adriatic and the entering<br />
Eastern Mediterranean current from one side, while on the other side there is a huge<br />
influx of freshwater from the surrounding mainland in autumn and winter-spring<br />
season, making it a very dynamic system with specific physical-chemical and<br />
biological characteristics. At the southwest, in front of the entrance to Boka Kotorska<br />
Bay, there is a point where the greatest depth of Adriatic Sea was measured (1330m).
65<br />
Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />
Fig.1. Map of sampling area in southern Adriatic - Bay of Boka Kotorska: 1. P-IBM<br />
(Sampling point near the Marine Biology Institute); 2. P-K (Sampling point in central part of<br />
Kotor’s Bay); 3. P-O (Sampling point near Orahovac); 4. P-R (Sampling point in central part of<br />
Risan’s Bay); 5. P-M (Sampling point near Morinj); 6. P-T (Sampling point in central part of<br />
Tivat’ Bay); 7. P-HN (Sampling point in central part of Herceg Novi’s Bay).<br />
Sampling - Zooplankton was sampled in 2002, on 25 th each month, at seven<br />
stations. The plankton nets used were of Nansen type, either surface area of the<br />
opening 1/4m 2 - length 2.5m, or surface area of the opening 1m 2 - length 3.5m. The<br />
density of the mesh was 150µm and 200µm. Vertical samples were taken from 10m to<br />
0m at the shallow stations of each bay. The collected zooplankton material was<br />
fixated on the ship, in 2.5% formaldehyde-sea water. The qualitative quantitative<br />
analyses were done in the laboratory from the representative sample of 1/25 of total<br />
catch, under the stereomicroscope and binocular lens. After that, the whole catch was<br />
carefully analyzed in order to record any rare species. The quantity was presented as<br />
number of individuals under m -2 below sea surface (ind.m -2 ). Temperature, salinity,
66<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
pH, oxygen saturation and percent oxygen saturation were measured in situ with a<br />
probe Multiline P-4, at 0.5m, 2m, 5m and 10m in the shallow part of the Bay near the<br />
coast, and at 0.5 m, 10m, 15m, 20m and 30m of depth at central deep stations. The<br />
transparency of the sea was measured with Secchi disk, 30 cm in diameter, of white<br />
color. Color of the sea was measured according to Forell from I to XXI.<br />
RESULTS AND DICUSSION<br />
Environmental conditions - The maximal temperature (27.7ºC) was recorded in<br />
July, while the medium maximal temperature of all layers was 25.3ºC. The minimal<br />
temperature (10ºC) was recorded in Risan Bay (P 2 -R) in February. The salinity of the<br />
sea varied within the values 7.9‰ - 38.71‰, and the lowest value ever recorded in the<br />
Bay was registered at the shallow station P-IBM in the surface layer 0-5m, 2.30‰ in<br />
September. Oxygen saturation varied from 4.68mL/L at the surface of Herceg Novi<br />
Bay (P 4 -HN) in June and July to 33.7mL/L at the 10 m depth at shallow station P-O in<br />
June. The percent of oxygen saturation was over 100%, and the greatest value was<br />
recorded at the shallow station P-O in June (220%), while at the surface at the middle<br />
of Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) it was 117%. The high values of oxygen saturation, which<br />
exceeded 100% throughout the year, show that the Bay is a biotope with a high<br />
degree of trophic activity. The whole Bay had relatively low values of transparency,<br />
from 4 m in Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) in September, to 15 m in Herceg Novi Bay (P 4 -HN) in<br />
January. The color of the sea according to Forell ranged from II in June to VI in<br />
September.<br />
Policheta general distribution – Polychaetes have occasionally been recorded<br />
in small numbers in Bay of Boka Kotorska. Their percentage participation within the<br />
whole zooplankton was: in Bay of Kotor 0.11%, in Bay of Risan 0.22%, in Bay of Tivat<br />
0.21% in Bay of Hercegnovi 0.73%. They are the most abundant during the autumn<br />
season. We have determined the species Tomopteris elegans Chun, which was<br />
occasionally recorded at all stations.<br />
18000<br />
16000<br />
14000<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
Polycheta [TOTAL]<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Fig.1. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study
67<br />
Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />
Postaje<br />
Sezone<br />
P-IBM P-O P-M P 1 -K P 2 -R P 3 -T P 4 -HN<br />
Zima 200 200 200 600 1200 400 100<br />
Proljeće 300 1100 1100 900 1000 100 600<br />
Ljeto 100 800 600 700 200 200 600<br />
Jesen 200 3100 600 4100 2300 2700 12600<br />
% 0.1 0.5 0.34 0.11 0.22 0.21 0.73<br />
Tab.1. Percentage participation of Polycheta group (ind/m 2 ) in total zooplankton during the study<br />
Polycheta<br />
Total zooplankton<br />
18000<br />
16000<br />
14000<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
5000000<br />
4000000<br />
3000000<br />
2000000<br />
1000000<br />
0<br />
Fig.2. Logarithm presentation of oscillations in abundance<br />
of total zooplankton and the polychaete group<br />
Tomopteris elegans Chun was the most abundant pelagic polychaete in the<br />
Adriatic. It was occasionally recorded at all stations in Boka Kotorska Bay, in<br />
insignificant number or as single individuals; it was more common and abundant in the<br />
Bay of Herceg Novi in autumn season. The percentage participation of this species<br />
within the total number of polychaete in the Bay was 3.27%. This species does not<br />
tolerate large variations in hydrographic factors, has a quite narrow ecological valence<br />
and therefore much larger abundance in the open sea waters of the Adriatic.<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Fig.3. Oscillations of abundance of species Tomopteris elegans in<br />
Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study
68<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
The larval stages of polychaetes were very abundant. The smaller maximum of<br />
abundance was recorded in March and April and the larger maximum in October and<br />
November. The percentage participation of larval stages in total number of recorded<br />
polychaete specimens was 71.27%. The other individuals of this group participated<br />
with 20.20% in total number of polychaetes. These are the first data on this group of<br />
organisms for Bay of Boka Kotorska.<br />
Polycheta larvae<br />
30000<br />
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
0<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Fig.4. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta larvae in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study<br />
Bay of Kotor<br />
Bay of Risan<br />
Policheta larvae<br />
Policheta sp.<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Policheta larvae<br />
Policheta sp.<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Bay of Tivat<br />
Bay of Hercegnovi<br />
Policheta larvae<br />
Policheta sp.<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Policheta larvae<br />
Policheta sp.<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Fig.6. Percentage participation of certain taxa from Polycheta group, for each bay separately
69<br />
Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />
Fig.5. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group throughout the year, for each bay separately<br />
Bay of Kotor<br />
4000<br />
3500<br />
3000<br />
2500<br />
2000<br />
1500<br />
1000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Polychaeta larvae<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Polycheta sp.<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Bay of Risan<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Polychaeta larvae<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Polycheta sp.<br />
2000<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
Bay of Tivat<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
Polychaeta larvae<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Polycheta sp.
70<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Bay of Hercegnovi<br />
12000<br />
10000<br />
8000<br />
6000<br />
4000<br />
Polychaeta larvae<br />
Tomopteris elegans<br />
Polycheta sp.<br />
2000<br />
0<br />
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Bay of Boka Kotorska is a typical neritic area of the eastern coast of Southern<br />
Adriatic. In the zooplankton biocenosis of the Bay we have recorded a great<br />
abundance of larval and juvenile forms. A large number of species was recorded in<br />
Polychaete group longitudinally from the inner bay (Bay of Kotor and Bay of Risan)<br />
toward the other bays (Bay of Tivat and Bay of Herceg Novi), together with a high<br />
abundance of larval forms toward the inner bays.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
APSTEIN,C., 1893: Die Alciopiden der Berliner Zool. Sammlung. – Arch. Naturg.<br />
59(1).<br />
B A L D A S S E R O N I ,V., 1914: Nota sui Tifloscolecidi raccolti della R.N. ‘’Ciclope’’<br />
nelle crociere III-IV. – R.Com. Tal. It. Mem. 38, 1-19.<br />
BATISTIĆ ,M., K R Š I N I Ć , F., JASPRICA, N., CARIĆ , M., V I L I Č I Ć ,<br />
LUČ O Ć , D.& D. 2004: Gelatinous Invertebrate Zooplankton of the South<br />
Adriatic: Species Composition and Vertical Distribution. Journal of Plankton<br />
Research, Vol.26. (3). p.1-16.<br />
B U S C H ,W., 1851: Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklung einiger<br />
werbelloser Seetiere. 1 – 143. Berlin.<br />
G A M U L I N ,T., 1948: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona srednjedalmatinskog otočnog<br />
područja. Acta Adriatica, 3(7), 159-194.<br />
G A M U L I N , T., 1979: Zooplankton istočne obale Jadranskog mora. Acta Biologica,<br />
8/j – 10, prir. istr., 43,p.177-217.
71<br />
Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />
H U R E , J., 1955: Distribution annuelle verticale du zooplancton sur une station de<br />
l'Adriatique meridionale.–Acta Adriatica, 7(7),1–72.<br />
H U R E , J., 1961: Dnevna migracija i sezonska vertikalna raspodjela zooplanktona<br />
dubljeg mora.–Ibid., 9(6),1–60).<br />
KNEŽEVIĆ , M.,1942: Prilog poznavanju geografske rasprostranjenosti Tomopterida<br />
u Jadranskom moru. – Vter. Arh., 12(11), 495-496.<br />
R O S A , D., 1912: Nota sui Tomopteridi dell Adriatico raccoleti Navi ‘’Montebello’’ e<br />
‘’Ciclope’’. – R.Com. Tal. Ital., Mem. 26,1-10.<br />
V E J D O V S K I , F., 1878: Beiträge der Tomopteriden. – Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool. 31.<br />
VUKANIĆ ,D., 1975: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona obalnih voda južnog Jadrana.<br />
Ekologija/Acta Biologica Jugoslavica/.10,1 , 79–106.<br />
VUKANIĆ ,V., 2004: Ekološka studija zooplanktona u funkciji analize stanja i zaštite<br />
biodiverziteta Bokokotorskog zaliva; (Magistarska teza) Biološki fakultet,<br />
Univerziteta u Beogradu, SiCG p.1-128.<br />
Z E I ,M., 1956: Pelagic Polychaetes of the Adriatic. – Thalassia Jugosl., 1,2, 33-68.<br />
Received: 02. 10. 2007.
72<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:73-89<br />
A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF<br />
THE RIVER ZETA (MONTENEGRO)<br />
Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ 1) , Vladimir PEŠIĆ 2) & Aleksandra Z E K O V I Ć 1)<br />
1<br />
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />
Montenegro (bogic1@cg.yu)<br />
2<br />
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />
Montenegro (pesicv@cg.yu)<br />
Key words:<br />
dragonflies,<br />
new records,<br />
faunistics,<br />
the Zeta River,<br />
Montenegro.<br />
Synopsis<br />
An updated list of the dragonflies (Odonata) of the<br />
River Zeta (Montenegro) is given, including 27 species.<br />
Three of them: Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus<br />
(Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus) are new for<br />
fauna of Montenegro.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
vilini konjici,<br />
novi nalazi,<br />
faunistika,<br />
rijeka Zeta,<br />
Crna Gora.<br />
Sinopsis<br />
PRILOG POZNAVANJU ODONATA (Odonata) RIJEKE ZETE<br />
(CRNA GORA)<br />
U radu je data lista vilinih konica (Odonata) rijeke Zete<br />
(Crna Gora), koja uključuje 27 vrsta. Tri vrste: Aeshna afinis<br />
Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus<br />
vulgatisimus (Linneus) nove su za faunu <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Although the order Odonata is an important group among the insects, studies of<br />
the Odonata fauna in Montenegro are too few (e.g., A d a m o v i ć , 1949, 1996;<br />
Adamović et al., 1996). The aim of our studies is both to give a new insight in the<br />
fauna of the country, and to obtain valuable documentation of the occurence of<br />
dragonflies in the previously unstudied area of the River Zeta. In the course of this<br />
survey, we detected 27 species, among them 3 are new for the fauna of Montenegro.
74<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
FIGURE 1. Map of study area<br />
with the sampling sites.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
In 2006-2007 the dragonflies fauna from 8 sampling sites on the River Zeta were<br />
studied (Fig. 1). The River Zeta is the main tributary of the River Morača and belongs<br />
to the drainage basin of the Skadar Lake, which is the largest lake of the Balkan<br />
Peninsula, with a surface area varying between 370 and 600 km 2 . Lakes Skadar and<br />
Ohrid and the River Drim, compose the largest river system in the western Balkan<br />
zoogeographic region (B ă n ă rescu, 1992), and drains in to the Adriatic Sea basin.
75<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
It starts near Nikšić, under the Planinica hill with a mean discharge in its mouth of 74<br />
m 3 s -1 , (M a r t i n o v i ć -Vitanović & Kalifatić , 1995), flows eastwards for 86 km<br />
until it confluxes into the Morača River near Podgorica.<br />
Odonata specimens were collected with aerial nets. Specimens were put into<br />
envelopes and transported to the lab. All the specimens were deposited in the<br />
collection of the first author. B e s c h o v s k i (1994) were used for identification of the<br />
specimens. Unless stated otherwise, all material has been collected by the first<br />
author. The composition of the material is given as: (males/females/larvae).<br />
RESULTS<br />
Subordo Zygoptera<br />
Family Calopterygidae<br />
Calopteryx virgo (Linneaus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Studenci, 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0); Slap Zete, 9<br />
March 2007 (0/0/2), 16 April 2007 (0/0/1), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1);<br />
Danilovgrad, 21 July 2007 (2/1/0), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Martinići, 18 May 2007<br />
(0/0/3), 21 June 2007 (3/2/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/2/0);<br />
Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Glava<br />
Zete, 9 March 2007 (0/0/2), Vidrovan.13 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />
Calopteryx splendens ( Harris, 1782)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Studenci, 9 March 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (1/2/1); Danilovgrad, 21<br />
June 2007 (3/1/0); Martinići, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 30 June 2007<br />
(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0), 26 August 2007 (1/1/3); Glava Zete, 21 June<br />
2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />
Family Platycnemidae<br />
Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771)<br />
Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />
Material: Martinići 13 July 2007 (2/2/1).<br />
Family Lestidae<br />
Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Vidrovan, source 14 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />
Remarks: New for Monenegro.
76<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890<br />
Distribution: Holarctic.<br />
Material: Vidrovan, source, 14.07.2007 (2/0/0).<br />
Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798)<br />
Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />
Material: Studenci, 21.06.2007 (3/1/2); Danilovgrad, 26.08.2007 (1/1/0);<br />
Martinići, 21.07.2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18.05.2007 leg. Zeković (1/1/0);Tunjevo,<br />
30.06.2007 (1/1/0),<br />
Remarks: New for Montenegro.<br />
Family Coenagrionidae<br />
Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0);<br />
Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/0/0).<br />
Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825)<br />
Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />
Material: Tunjevo 30 June 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0).<br />
Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850)<br />
Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />
Material: Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/0); Danilovgrad, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0), 30<br />
June 2007 (2/2/0); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />
(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/2/0); Glava Zete 13 July 2007 (2/2/0).<br />
Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />
Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />
Material: Slap Zete, 5 May 2007 (2/2/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />
2007 (3/2/0).<br />
Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />
Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 26 August 2007 (1/1/0);<br />
Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/0);<br />
Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />
Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />
Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />
Material: Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0), 13 July 2007 leg.Zeković (1/1/0).
77<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
Subordo Anisoptera<br />
Family Aeshnidae<br />
Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820<br />
Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />
Material: Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18 May 2007 leg.<br />
Zeković (0/0/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />
Remarks: New for Monenegro<br />
Aeshna cyanea (Müller, 1764)<br />
Distribution: Europe.<br />
Material: Vidrovan, izvor, 14 July 2007 (1/1/2).<br />
Family Libellulidae<br />
Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845)<br />
Distribution: East Mediterranean.<br />
Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />
Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (1/2/2); Tunjevo, 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />
2007 (2/1/0).<br />
Orthetrum cancellatum ( Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />
Material: Slap Zete, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković<br />
(1/1/2); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (1/0/0).<br />
Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823)<br />
Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />
Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/2); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/0/0).<br />
Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Europe<br />
Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (4/2/4); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />
Dobro Polje, 21 June 2007 (3/1/3); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 9 March<br />
2007 leg. Zeković (0/0/4), 26 August 2007 (4/0/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />
Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/0/0), 21 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />
Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841)<br />
Distribution: Mediterranean.
78<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1); Slap Zete, 26<br />
August 2007 (2/0/0),<br />
Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />
Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />
Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0); Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/2/2);<br />
Danilovgrad 21 July 2007 (2/1/1), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Glava Zete, 5 May 2007<br />
leg.Zeković (2/0/0), 30 June 2007 (2/2/1); Vidrovan 14 July 2007 (1/0/0).<br />
Sympetrum sanquineum ( Müller, 1764)<br />
Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />
Material: Martinići, 21 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />
Family Cordulegastridae<br />
Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843)<br />
Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />
Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 13 July 2007<br />
(2/1/0), 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/2/2),<br />
30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />
Family Cordulidae<br />
Somatochlora metallica (Vander Linden, 1825)<br />
Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />
Material: Slap Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), 21 July 2007<br />
(2/0/0); Danilovgrad, 13 July 2007 leg. Zeković (2/3/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />
(2/0/0); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/1/1); Glava Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Vidrovan,<br />
14July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />
Family Gomphidae<br />
Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825)<br />
Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />
Material: Studenci, 30 June 2007 (3/3/4), Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/3), 30<br />
June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/2); Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), Martinići, 21 June<br />
2007 (2/2/4), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0), Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), Tunjevo, 30<br />
June 2007 (1/0/0), 13 July 2007 (3/2/3), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007. (2/1/3), Vidrovan,<br />
14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />
Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: European subregion.
79<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
Material: Studenci, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2); Slap Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/3/4); Dobro<br />
Polje, 5 May 2007 (1/0/0), 18 May 2007 (1/1/2), 21 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/0/0);<br />
Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (1/2/2); Glava Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />
2007 (1/1/2).<br />
Remarks: New for Montenegro<br />
Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
Distribution: Holomediterranean subregion.<br />
Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (2/0/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/3); Tunjevo, 30 June<br />
2007 (1/1/3), 13 July 2007 (1/2/3); Glava Zete, 18 May 2007 (3/1/4), 21 June 2007<br />
(3/2/2); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
In the freshwater habitats of the River Zeta 27 species of dragonflies (Odonata)<br />
belonging to 15 genera and 9 families were recorded at 8 sites. Of these, 3 species:<br />
Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />
(Linneus) are recorded from Montenegro for the first time.<br />
The total number of specimens of dragonflies collected on the River Zeta<br />
amounts to 486. Eight species are dominant (> 5% total abundance): Calopterix virgo<br />
(Linneus), C. splendens (Harris), Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys), Somatochlora<br />
metalica (Vander Linden), Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus), Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />
(Linneus), G. flavipes (Charpentier) and Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus). Six<br />
species are subdominant (abundance 5-2%): Lestes barbarus (Fabricius), Coenagrion<br />
ornatum (Sélys), C. hastulatum (Charpentier), C. puella (Linneus), Orthetrum anceps<br />
(Schneider), Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) and S. striolatum (Charpentier). The<br />
remaning 12 species have abundance less than
80<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Table 1. Abundance of the collected species. D = dominant (> 5% total abundance), SD =<br />
subdominant (2-5% total abundance), R = rare (< 2% total abundance).<br />
Species<br />
Number of<br />
collected<br />
specimens<br />
Relative<br />
abundance<br />
%<br />
Dominancy<br />
1. Calopterix virgo (Linneus, 1758) 46 9.46% D<br />
2. Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) 34 6.99% D<br />
3. Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823) 3 0.61% R<br />
4. Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890 2 0.41% R<br />
5. Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798) 14 2.88% SD<br />
6. Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771) 4 0.82% R<br />
7. Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820) 8 1.64% R<br />
8. Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825) 9 1.85% R<br />
9. Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850) 24 4.93% SD<br />
10. Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840) 11 2.26% SD<br />
11. Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758) 13 2.67% SD<br />
12. Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840) 6 1.23% R<br />
13. Aeshna cyanea Müller, 1764 4 0.82% R<br />
14. Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820 6 1.23% R<br />
15. Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843) 26 5.34% D<br />
16. Somatochlora metalica (Vander Linden,1825) 27 5.55% D<br />
17. Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758) 38 7.81% D<br />
18. Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758) 8 1.64% R<br />
19. Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845) 15 3.08% S<br />
20. Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823) 7 1.44% R<br />
21. Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758) 6 1.23% R<br />
22. Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841) 17 3.49% SD<br />
23. Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840) 20 4.11% SD<br />
24. Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller, 1764) 5 1.02% R<br />
25. Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus, 1758) 36 7.4% D<br />
26. Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825) 56 11.1% D<br />
27. Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus, 1758) 41 8.43% D<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We are grateful to Branimir Gligorović and Igor Temelkovski<br />
for their logistic support.
81<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
APPENDIX 1. Photographs of the collected species.<br />
FIGURE 2.<br />
Calopteryx virgo ♀<br />
FIGURE 3.<br />
Calopteryx virgo ♂<br />
FIGURE 4.<br />
Calopteryx splendens ♂<br />
FIGURE 5.<br />
Calopteryx splendens ♀<br />
FIGURE 6.<br />
Lestes sponsa (Hensemann) ♂<br />
FIGURE 7.<br />
Lestes dryas Kirby ♂
82<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
FIGURE 8.<br />
Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) ♀<br />
FIGURE 9.<br />
Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas) ♂,♀<br />
FIGURE 10.<br />
Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden) ♂<br />
FIGURE 11.<br />
Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier) ♂,♀<br />
FIGURE 12.<br />
Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) juvenile ♀<br />
FIGURE 13.<br />
Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) larvae
83<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
FIGURE 14.<br />
Coenagrion puella (Linneus) juvenile ♀<br />
FIGURE 15.<br />
Coenagrion puella (Linneus) ♂<br />
FIGURE 16.<br />
Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier) ♂<br />
FIGURE 17.<br />
Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier) ♂<br />
FIGURE 18.<br />
Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♂<br />
FIGURE 19.<br />
Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♀
84<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
FIGURE 20.<br />
Aeshna afinis Vander Linden larvae<br />
FIGURE 21.<br />
Aeshna cyanea larvae<br />
FIGURE 22.<br />
Aeshna cyanea ♂<br />
FIGURE 23.<br />
Aeshna cyanea ♀<br />
FIGURE 24.<br />
Orthetrum anceps (Schneider) ♀<br />
FIGURE 25.<br />
Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus) ♀
85<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
FIGURE 26.<br />
Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé) ♂<br />
FIGURE 27.<br />
Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) ♀<br />
FIGURE 28.<br />
Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♂<br />
FIGURE 29.<br />
Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♀<br />
FIGURE 30.<br />
Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus) ♀<br />
FIGURE 31.<br />
Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier) ♂
86<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
FIGURE 32.<br />
Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller) ♂, ♀<br />
FIGURE 33.<br />
Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys) ♂<br />
FIGURE 34. Somatohlora<br />
metalica ♀ and ♂<br />
FIGURE 35.<br />
Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♀<br />
FIGURE 36.<br />
Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♂
87<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
FIGURE 37.<br />
Onychogomphus forcipatus ♀<br />
FIGURE 38.<br />
Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier) ♂<br />
APPENDIX 2. Photographs of the sampling sites.<br />
FIGURE 39. The River Zeta – Studenci<br />
FIGURE 40. The River Zeta – Martinići<br />
FIGURE 41. The River Zeta – Danilovgrad<br />
FIGURE 42. The River Zeta – Slap Zete
88<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
FIGURE 43. The River Zeta – Dobro Polje<br />
FIGURE 44. The River Zeta – Tunjevo<br />
FIGURE 45. The River Zeta – Glava Zete<br />
FIGURE 46. The River Zeta – Vidrovan<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Adamović , Ž. 1949 : La liste des Odonates du Museum d'historie naturelle du Pays<br />
Serbe. - Glasnik Prirodnjačkog <strong>muzej</strong>a srpske zemlje, Beograd, 1–2: 275– 293.<br />
Adamović , Ž. 1996: Odonata taken and observed in Donji Ceklin, Montenegro. -<br />
Acta Entomologica Serbica, 1(1/2): 39-48.<br />
Adamović , Ž., Anđ us, Lj. & Mihajlović , L j . 1996: Odonata (Insecta) in:<br />
K a r a m a n , G. (Ed.). The Fauna of Durmitor. - The Montenegrin Academy of<br />
Sciences and Arts, 5, 43 – 80, Podgorica.<br />
B ă n ă r e s c u P. M. 1992: Zoogeography of Freshwaters. Vol. 2. Distribution and<br />
Dispersal of Freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia. - AULA-Verlag,<br />
Wiesbaden, 517–1091.<br />
B e s c h o v s k i , V. 1994: Fauna Bulgarica. 23 Insecta, Odonata. - Bulg. Acad. Sci.,<br />
Sofia. 372pp.
89<br />
Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />
Martinović -Vitanović V. & Kalafatić V. 1995: Basic Hydrogeological<br />
Characteristics of Yugoslavian Freshwaters. In S t e v a n o v i ć V & V a s i ć V.<br />
(eds), Biodiverzitet Jugoslavije. - Ecolibri, Biološki Fakultet, Beograd, 97–115 (in<br />
Serbian).<br />
Received: 22.11.2007
90<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:91-100<br />
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF<br />
THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE, SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA, MONTENEGRO<br />
Jelena N I K Č EVIĆ 1)<br />
1)<br />
Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Trg Bećir bega Osmanagića 16,<br />
Montenegro, E-mail: jnikcevic@cg.yu<br />
Key words:<br />
fauna,<br />
orthoptera,<br />
Ćemovsko polje field,<br />
semi-desert,<br />
ecological<br />
characteristics<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
Orthopteroid fauna of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />
field in Montenegro, is unknown and insufficiently studied.<br />
Owing to the investigations in period 2006-2007 in the area<br />
of Ćemovsko polje 37 species were determined and grouped<br />
in 4 superorders, 2 orders, 8 families and 27 genera. Data<br />
about ecological chara-cteristics, distribution, zoogeography<br />
and type of endemism for each species are presented.<br />
Ključne reči:<br />
fauna,<br />
pravokrilci,<br />
Ćemovsko polje,<br />
polupustinja,<br />
ekološke karakteristike<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
PRELIMINARNA ISTRAŽIVANJA FAUNE<br />
ORTOPTEROIDNIH INSEKATA POLUPUSTINJSKOG PODRUČJA<br />
ĆEMOVSKOG POLJA, CRNA GORA<br />
Fauna ortoptera Ćemovskog polja u Crnoj Gori je<br />
nepoznata i neistražena. Zahvaljujući istraživanjima u<br />
periodu 2006-2007. godine na prostoru Ćemovskog polja<br />
determinisano je 37 vrsta svrstanih u 4 nadreda, 2 reda, 8<br />
familija i 27 rodova. U radu su takodje dati podaci o<br />
distribuciji prisutnih vrsta, zoogeografskoj pripadnosti, tipu<br />
endemizma i ekološkim karakteristikama.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Throughout southern Europe, 14000 years ago the predominant picture was of<br />
an arid, semi-desert like steppe perhaps similar to the cool and arid mountain steppes<br />
found today in the Pamirs of southern Russia. A rapid warming and moistening of<br />
climate all across Europe occurred shortly before this time, with insect communities in
92<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
NW Europe suggesting conditions as warm as or warmer than the present-day for<br />
about the first 500 14C years (Atkinson et al. 1987). That sudden event was the basis<br />
for today’s picture of orthopteroid fauna and their evolution.<br />
The suddenness of this warming left ecosystems out of equilibrium. Trees had<br />
not yet had time to spread back over Europe, and a steppe cover predominated. The<br />
ice sheets in the north began to melt, but that had lasted for thousand years less than<br />
in the normal warm climate period. Some open woodland cover appeared in western<br />
Russia quite rapidly – within a few hundred years - after the initial warming events and<br />
woodland cover began increasing in the mountainous areas of southern Europe where<br />
trees had survived the glaciations.<br />
Data for orthoipteroid insects from region of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />
field near Podgorica, Montenegro, are unknown in the literature. In course of<br />
investigation in period 2006-2007 of the orthopteroid fauna of this field, the detailed<br />
data about ecological characteristics and distribution in the semi-desert condition<br />
were established.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Material was collected during 2006/2007. Depending of differences in the<br />
taxonomic group sampling was realised by application of different methods (collecting<br />
with mowing and method with individual catching). Collected material was identified by<br />
using keys: H a r z , K. (1969): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague; H a r z , K.<br />
(1975): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague; H a r z , K., K a l t e nbach, A.<br />
(1976): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague; U s , P. (1992): Favna<br />
Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti,<br />
Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Biološki Institut Jovana Hadžija, br. 12., Ljubljana.<br />
INVESTIGATED AREA<br />
The Ćemovsko semi-desert field is the part of Zeta valey in Montenegro. It is<br />
situated southeast of the capital town of Montenegro – Podgorica, between the two<br />
rivers Morača and Cijevna. The soil subastrate of this field is made of fluvioglacial<br />
sand. In the field there are hills: Ljubović (112m), Zelenika (166m) and Srpska Gora<br />
(95m). The climate is modified Mediterranean one. The greater part of the filed is used<br />
for human activities. Some parts of the field, nearer to Podgorica, are under the<br />
great antropogenic influences.
93<br />
Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />
Picture 1. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />
Biogegrafic charactetistics of vegetation:<br />
This type of semi-desert habitats biogeograficaly belongs to Mediterranean<br />
semi-desert province (Š i m i ć , 1987 in L a k u š i ć , R.) with discontinueted areal from<br />
northwest Africa and Pirinei peninsula in the West, to Iran and Irak to the East. This<br />
type of geological soil, climate features and ecological factors are basic for xeroterm<br />
vegetation of semi-desert type. According to Černjavski (1949) this type of vegetation<br />
communities is predominated by Satureia subspicata-Poa bulbosa which spread all<br />
over the field.<br />
RESULTS<br />
The results of the investigations from 2006 and 200. at Ćemovsko polje field are<br />
presented on the Table 1. with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological<br />
characteristics. In accordance to these investigations 37 species belonging to 27<br />
genera classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families of Orthopteroidea have been<br />
determined.
94<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Table1: The preliminary list of orthopteroid fauna at the semi-desert field Ćemovsko<br />
polje, with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological characteristics.<br />
EU: European, M: Mediterranean, MS: Mediterranean-submediterranean, OM:<br />
oromediterranean-mediterranean, TM: tropic-mediterranean, TPM: tropicpontomediterranean<br />
PM: pontomediterranean, E: endemic characteristics, EC: ecological characteristics<br />
EU M MS OM TM TPM PM E EC<br />
MANTODEA<br />
Mantidae<br />
1.Mantis religiosa<br />
Linneus, 1758<br />
Empusidae<br />
2.Empusa fasciata -<br />
Brulle 1836<br />
GRYLLOPTERA<br />
TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />
Tetigonidae<br />
3.Leptophyes<br />
punctatissima<br />
(Bosc, 1792)<br />
4.Phaneroptera<br />
nana<br />
Fieber, 1853<br />
5.Tylopsis liliifolia<br />
(Fabricius, 1973)<br />
6.Saga pedo<br />
(Pallas, 1771)<br />
7.Eupholidoptera<br />
chabrieri schmidti<br />
(Charpentier, 1825)<br />
8.Metrioptera<br />
ambitiosa<br />
Uvarov, 1923<br />
9.Metrioptera<br />
oblongicollis<br />
(Bruner, 1882)<br />
10.Pholidoptera<br />
dalmatica<br />
(Krauss, 1878)<br />
11.Pholidoptera<br />
littoralis<br />
(Fiaber, 1853)<br />
12.Pholidoptera<br />
maritima<br />
Zeuner, 1931<br />
13.Rhacocleis<br />
germanica (Herrich +<br />
+ phitophil, thermophil<br />
+ thermophil<br />
+ thermophil<br />
phytophil<br />
silvicol<br />
+ thermophil<br />
arbusticol<br />
arboricol<br />
+ thermophil<br />
graminicol<br />
arbusticol<br />
+ praticol<br />
graminicolarbusticol<br />
pratinicol<br />
thermophil<br />
+ mediterran/<br />
submediterran<br />
silvicol, terricol<br />
arbusticol<br />
thermophil<br />
+ Balcan praticol higrophil<br />
phitophil<br />
+ Balcan praticol xeromesophil<br />
phitophil<br />
+ mediterran thermophil,<br />
xerophil,<br />
graminicol<br />
+ mediterran silvicol arbusticol<br />
thermophil<br />
+ thermophil<br />
xerophil<br />
graminicol<br />
thermophil
95<br />
Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />
Schaeffer, 1840)<br />
14.Ephgippiger<br />
ephippiger<br />
(Fiebig, 1784)<br />
GRYLLODEA<br />
Gryllidae<br />
15.Oecanthus<br />
pellucens<br />
(Scopoli) 1763<br />
Gryllotalpidae<br />
16.Gryllotalpa<br />
gryllotalpa<br />
(Linneus, 1758)<br />
ORTHOPTERA<br />
TETRIGODEA<br />
Tetrigidae<br />
17.Depressotetrix<br />
depressus<br />
Brisout, 1848<br />
ACRIDOIDEA<br />
Catantopidae<br />
18.Pezottetix<br />
giornae<br />
(Rossi, 1794)<br />
19.Anacridium<br />
aegyptum<br />
(Linneus 1764)<br />
20.Schistocerca<br />
gregaria<br />
(Forskal, 1775)<br />
21.Calliptamus<br />
italicus<br />
(Linneus 1758)<br />
Acrididae<br />
22.Acrida turrita<br />
(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
23.Acrida ungarica<br />
ssp. mediterranea<br />
(Herbst 1786)<br />
24.Acrotylus<br />
insubricus<br />
(Scopoli, 1786)?<br />
25.Acrotylus<br />
longipes<br />
(Charpentier,1845)<br />
+ pratinicol silvicol<br />
arbusticol<br />
+ silvicol herbicol<br />
arboricol<br />
+ geobiont<br />
higrophil mesophil<br />
+ xerophil<br />
+ thermophil<br />
pratinicol<br />
terricol<br />
herbicol<br />
+ arbusticolarboricol<br />
+ arbusticol<br />
arboricol<br />
+ thermophil,<br />
pratinicol<br />
tericol<br />
herbicol xerophil<br />
+ thermophil<br />
pratinicol<br />
graminicol<br />
+ thermophil<br />
hygrophil<br />
pratinicol<br />
graminicol<br />
+ pratinicol<br />
termophil<br />
tericol,<br />
psamophil<br />
xerophil<br />
+ Pratinicol<br />
Termophil<br />
tericol, psamophil,<br />
xerophil
96<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
26.Acrotylus<br />
patruelis (Herrisch-<br />
Schaeffer, 1838)<br />
27.Aiolopus<br />
strepens<br />
(Latreille) 1804<br />
28.Aiolopus<br />
thalassinum<br />
(Fabricius 1781)<br />
29.Oedipoda<br />
coerulescens<br />
(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />
30.Oedipoda<br />
germanica<br />
(Latreille, 1804)<br />
31.Oedipoda<br />
miniata<br />
(Pallas, 1771)<br />
32.Psophus<br />
stridulus<br />
(Linne, 1758)<br />
33.Sphingonotus<br />
coerulans<br />
(Linneus, 1767)<br />
34.Aeropus<br />
sibiricus<br />
(Linneus) 1767<br />
35.Dociostaurus<br />
genei<br />
(Ocskay) 1832<br />
36.Dociostaurus<br />
marrocanus<br />
(Thunberg 1815)<br />
37.Omocestus<br />
rufipes<br />
(Zetterstedt, 1821)<br />
+ pratinicol,<br />
thermophil, terricol,<br />
psamophil, xserophil<br />
+ thermophil,<br />
pratinicol,<br />
geophil,<br />
phitophilmesophil<br />
+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />
geophilphitophil,<br />
higrophil<br />
+ pratinicolterricol,<br />
xerophil<br />
+ pratinicolterricol,<br />
litophil, xerophil<br />
+ xerophil, thermophil<br />
+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />
terricol<br />
xerophil<br />
+ terricol,<br />
psamophil,xerophil<br />
+ hygrophilstenotherm,<br />
thermophob<br />
+ thermophil, pratinicol<br />
+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />
geophilphitophil<br />
+ xerophil<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Discussion in this chapter is about diversity and connections among the<br />
orthopteroid insects within different taxonomic groups. The zoogeographic<br />
characteristics of species are also presented, with remarks on endemic species.<br />
MANTODEA<br />
Fam- Mantidae - 1 species<br />
Mantis religiosa<br />
Fam. Empusidae – 1 species<br />
Empusa fasciata
97<br />
Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />
TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />
Fam. Tettigonidae – 12 species<br />
Leptophyes punctatissima, Phaneroptera nana, Tylopsis liliifolia, Saga pedo,<br />
Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis,<br />
Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis, Pholidoptera maritima, Rhacocleis<br />
germanica , Ephgippiger ephippiger<br />
Fam. Gryllidae - 2 species<br />
Oecanthus pellucens, Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa<br />
TETRIGODEA<br />
Fam. Tetrigidae - 1 species<br />
Depressotetrix depressus<br />
ACRIDOIDEA<br />
Fam. Catantopidae - 4 species<br />
Pezottetix giornae, Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Calliptamus italicus<br />
Fam Acrididae – 16 species<br />
Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp. mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus, Acrotylus<br />
longipes, Acrotylus patruelis, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinum, Oedipoda<br />
coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Oedipoda miniata, Psophus stridulus,<br />
Sphingonotus coerulans, Aeropus sibiricus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />
marrocanu, Omocestus rufipes<br />
The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), after which there<br />
follow the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to<br />
families with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae,<br />
Empusidae and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />
Zoogeographic analysis of faunistic elements:<br />
European species: 13<br />
Mantis religiosa, Leptophyes punctatissima, Saga pedo, Rhacocleis germanica,<br />
Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa, Pezottetix giornae, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinu,<br />
Oedipoda coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Psophus stridulus, Aeropus sibiricus,<br />
Omocestus rufipes<br />
Mediterranean species: 2<br />
Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis<br />
Mediterranean – submediterranean species: 11<br />
Empusa fasciata, Tylopsis liliifolia, Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera<br />
ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis, Pholidoptera maritima, Oecanthus pellucens,<br />
Depressotetrix depressus, Calliptamus italicus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />
marrocanus
98<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Picture 4. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />
Oromediterranean-mediterranean species: - no data<br />
Tropic-mediterranean species: 2<br />
Acrotylus patruelis, Sphingonotus coerulans<br />
Tropicpontomediterranean species: 5<br />
Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp.<br />
mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus<br />
Pontomediterranean species: 4<br />
Phaneroptera nana, Ephgippiger ephippiger, Acrotylus longipes, Oedipoda miniata<br />
Endemic species: 5<br />
Balcan endemic species: 2<br />
Metrioptera ambitiosa , Metrioptera oblongicollis<br />
Mediterranean endemic species: 2<br />
Pholidoptera dalmatica , Pholidoptera littoralis<br />
Mediteranean-submediterranean species: 1<br />
Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti
99<br />
Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />
The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />
followed by 11 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />
belongs to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution and four species to<br />
pontomediterranean species. The lowest number (2) of species are those with<br />
mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. There are no available<br />
data for oromediterranean-mediterranean species distribution.<br />
There are 5 endemic species with Balkan endemic type and 2 species with<br />
Mediterranean endemic type and 1 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean type<br />
of endemism.<br />
In this discussion we can see that the greatest number of species have<br />
thermophil, xerophil, graminicol ecological characteristics.<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
During the investigation of ortopteroid insects 37 species belonging to 27 genera<br />
classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families were determined from collected<br />
material. The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), followed by<br />
the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to families<br />
with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae, Empusidae<br />
and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />
The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />
then follow 11 species of mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />
belong to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution, 4 species to<br />
pontomediterranean ones. The lowest number (2) of species belongs to species with<br />
mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. For oromediterraneanmediterranean<br />
species there are no data so far.<br />
We can see that the greatest number of species have thermophil, xerophil,<br />
graminicol ecological characteristics in every type of taxonomical belonging.<br />
In Ćemovsko polje filed, according to this investigation (in literature there are no<br />
data about orthopteroid fauna on that field), the diversity of orthopteroid fauna is<br />
relatively small owing to a low diversity of vegetation cover, but abounding in relict<br />
and endemic species and species with low number specimens. Last characteristic is<br />
present in some rare taxa. This „small number“of orthopteroid insects has an origin in<br />
still insufficiently studied conditions in the history of orthopteroid evolution for that<br />
area. Some species and some habitats were on the same place at the same time with<br />
different ecological characteristics. Vegetation communities were displaced from one<br />
type to the other, opposite to the natural way of evolution of origin and succession.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
A D A M S , J.: Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak<br />
Ridge, TN 37831, USA<br />
Č E J C H A N, A. 1984: Catalogue of the Orthopteroid Insects of Montenegro - Acta<br />
faunistica entomologica musei nationalis Pragae sv. XVII: 9-22, Pragae.
100<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Č ERNJAVSKI, P., GREBENŠČ IKOV, O. & PAVLOVIĆ , Z. 1949: O flori i<br />
vegetaciji Skadarskog područja. - Glasn. Prir. Muz. Srpske Zemlje, Ser. B, Biol.<br />
Nauke 1-2: 4-91. Beograd.<br />
H A R Z, K. 1969: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague.<br />
H A R Z, K. 1975: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague<br />
H A R Z, K., KALTENBACH, A. 1976: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague.<br />
I N G R I S C H, S., KÖEHLER, G. 1998: Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas, Die Neue<br />
Brehm-Bucherei Bd.629: 27-41, Westarp Wissenchaften - Magdeburg.<br />
ŠIMIĆ , S. 1987: Syrphidae (Insecta, Diptera), Biogeografska i ekološka analiza<br />
faune osolikih muva Durmitora sa osvrtom na faunu osolikih muva <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>,<br />
Fauna Durmitora Sv. 2., CANU, Posebna izdanja, knj. 21, Odeljenje prirodnih<br />
nauka, knj. 13: 11-154, Titograd.<br />
U S , P. (1992): Favna Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija<br />
Znanosti in Umetnosti, Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Dela 32, Biološki institut<br />
Jovana Hadžija, 12:61-285.<br />
Received: 25.10.2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:101-109<br />
MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM<br />
BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />
Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹, Tanja V U K O V ²<br />
¹ Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />
² Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Beograd, Srbija<br />
Key words:<br />
Bufo bufo,<br />
morphometric,<br />
qualitative characters,<br />
differences between<br />
the sexes.<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
In this paper we have presented the results of the<br />
analysis of morphological traits of Common Toad Bufo bufo<br />
population, from Biogradsko Lake. On the samples taken<br />
from this locality univariant and multivariant statistical<br />
analyses have been performed. A large number of<br />
morphometric and qualitative characters have been done for<br />
the first time. For morphometric characters basic parameters<br />
of descriptive statistics have been calculated, and for<br />
qualitative characters three qualitative traits with three<br />
conditions at four body regions of Common Toad separately<br />
by sexes, have been treated. As for the morphometric<br />
characters it has been established that there is a significant<br />
statistical difference between the sexes.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Bufo bufo,<br />
morfometrijski,<br />
kvalitativni karakteri,<br />
razlike među<br />
polovima.<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE OBIČNE KRASTAVE ŽABE<br />
BUFO BUFO (BUFONIDAE) SA BIOGRADSKOG JEZERA<br />
U ovom radu su prikazani rezultati analize morfoloških<br />
odlika populacije krastave žabe Bufo bufo, sa Biogradskog<br />
jezera. Na uzorcima uzetim sa ovog lokaliteta urađene su<br />
univarijantne i multivarijantne statističke analize. Po prvi put<br />
je obrađen veliki broj morfometrijskih i kvalitativnih karaktera.<br />
Za morfometrijske karaktere izračunati su osnovni parametri<br />
deskriptivne statistike, a za kvalitativne karaktere obrađene<br />
su tri kvalitativne karakteristike sa tri stanja na četiri tjelesna<br />
regiona obične krastave žabe odvojeno po polovima. Što se<br />
tiče morfometrijskih karaktera utvrđena je statistički značajna<br />
razlika između polova.
102<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Common Toad has a large distribution and popultes mainly the entire palearctic<br />
area. It populates almost the entire Europe, with the exception of far north, Ireland,<br />
Corsika, Sardinia, Balear's Islands, Malta, Crete, as well as some smaller<br />
islands (B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). It also populates the northwestern Africa<br />
(P a s t e u r and B o n s , 1959). Although common at lower altitudes, it may also be<br />
found also on altitudes exceedeing 2500 m and on Iberian Peninsula (A n g e l , 1946;<br />
B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). In Montenegro it is mainly widely distributed. Owing to<br />
wide distribution, climatic conditions in various parts of areal of distribution are very<br />
different. Thus, in northern part of the areal the winters are long, cold and humid, so<br />
that the period favorable for growth is rather short (J o h a n n e s s e n , 1970). On<br />
higher altitudes the conditions are even more extreme. On the other hand, southern<br />
populations of this species are exposed to much more favorable conditions of outer<br />
environment; therefore the period favorable for growth is much longer.<br />
Species Bufo bufo is a polytypic one. From the scope of this species a taxon<br />
from the Far East has been separated on the level of species Bufo gargarizans<br />
(A n a n j e v a et al. 1998, K u z m i n 1999a, 1999b), and the character of polytype is<br />
determined to it in addition to nominotype subspecies three other ones B. b.<br />
grediscola, B. b. verrucosissimus, B. b. spinosus. If we recognize the fact that<br />
Caucasus Toad (Bufo verrucosissimus) is a separate species (e.g. O r l o v a &<br />
T u n i y e v 1989, A n a n j e v a et al. 1998), than the taxonomic differentiation in scope<br />
of Common Toad is even more limited. Nominotype subspecies is the most widely<br />
distributed (Northern and Southern Europe). The two first subspecies have a limited<br />
geographical area (mountains Gredos and Caucasus), nominotype subspecies is the<br />
most widely distributed (Northern and Central Europe), whereas the areal of<br />
subspecies B. b. spinosus is limited to the region of Mediterranean (northwestern<br />
parts of Africa, southeast Europe, southern Switzerland, Italy as well as the southern<br />
parts of France and Spain).<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
A total of 41 specimens has been analyzed, 26 males and 15 females. The<br />
largest part of the material has been collected in mating period. The material has<br />
mainly been manually collected and meredov (a net with a handle) has also been<br />
used.<br />
The samples belong to herpetological collection of the Natural History Museum<br />
of Montenegro; they are kept in 70 % alcohole.<br />
Morphometric analysis has been done on 21 traits which determine size and<br />
form of body and head of tailless amphibians. Measured traits are: L – longthe of body
103<br />
Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />
from the top of head to the opening of the cloaca; Lpa – length of front exstremity; F –<br />
length of femur measured fromxthe opening of cloaca to knee joint; T – lengthj of<br />
tibiofibula from knee joint to tibiotarsal joint; P – distance from tibiotarsal joint to the<br />
tip of the longest finger (IV); n – length of metatarsus from the internal metatarsal<br />
ridgelet to the tip of the longest finger (IV); DpPa – length of the first finger off front<br />
exstremity; DpPp – length of the first finger of back extremity; Cint – the biggest<br />
length of the internal metatarsal ridgelet; Lc – length of head from the top of head to<br />
jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between the jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />
space between the internal edges of eye lids; Lc – lengh of head from the top of head<br />
to jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />
space between the internal edges of eye lids; Spi – distance betwnn the outer nasal<br />
openings; Spcr – distance between front angles of eye openings; Lo – the largest<br />
length of eyeball; Ltp – the largest width of upper eye lid; Dro – distance from the top<br />
of head to the eye edge; Dno- distance of nasal opening from eye; Lh - length of<br />
cutaneous folds on heels; Lg - length of partoid salivary glands; Wg - width of<br />
salivary glands and weight.<br />
Three qualitative traits (Table 1) with three conditions on four body regions of<br />
toad: head part - dorsal side, dorsal part-dorsal side, head part -ventral side,<br />
abdominal part-ventral side.<br />
The conditions of qualitative traits have been coded in the following manner:<br />
Dorsal side – head part:<br />
1a - round warts, 1b - oval warts, 1c – kidneylike warts; 2a – very protuberant<br />
warts, 2b – protuberant warts, 2c – drawn in warts; 3a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />
warts; 3b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 3c – weakly marked thornlike<br />
ends of warts;<br />
Dorsal side - dorsal part:<br />
4a - round warts, 4b - oval warts, 4c - kidneylike warts; 5a – very protuberant<br />
warts, 5b – protuberant warts, 5c – drawn in warts; 6a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />
warts; 6b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 6c – weakly marked thornlike<br />
ends of warts;<br />
Ventral side – head part:<br />
7a - round warts, 7b - oval warts, 7c - kidneylike warts; 8a – very protuberant<br />
warts, 8b – protuberant warts, 8c – drawn in warts; 9a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />
warts; 9b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 9c – weakly marked thornlike<br />
ends of warts;
104<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Ventral side – abdominal part:<br />
10a - round warts, 10b - oval warts, 10c - kidneylike warts; 11a – very<br />
protuberant warts, 11b – protuberant warts, 11c – drawn in warts; 12a – very marked<br />
thornlike ends of warts; 12b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 12c – weakly<br />
marked thornlike ends of warts;<br />
Trait<br />
Warts shape<br />
Condition<br />
a) round<br />
b) oval<br />
c) reniform<br />
a)very convex<br />
Warts convexity<br />
b) convex<br />
c) inverted<br />
Prominence of thornlike<br />
warts endings<br />
a)very prominent<br />
b)averagely prominent<br />
c)weakly prominent<br />
Table 1. Analysed qualitatie traits in Bufo bufo<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Programme package STATISTICA (version 5.0) has been used for statistical<br />
analysis of data. For morphometric characters basic parameters of descriptive<br />
statistics have been separately calculated by genders: medium value ( x ), error of<br />
medium value (SE), standard deviation (SD), minimal (min) and maximal (max) values<br />
traits as well as coeficient of variation (CV). Analysis of sexual dimorphism has been<br />
performed on basic data (untransformed measures for every property), as well as on<br />
standardized residuals on eight traits (L, Lpa, F, T, P, n, Lc, Ltc). Regression of every<br />
property on body length (L) and use of standardized residuals from such a regression<br />
provides for the elimination of the impact of body size. Comparison of differences<br />
between the genders on basic data and on standardised residuals has been performed<br />
by the use of Tukey Test for the samples of uneven size.<br />
For the establishment of the significance of differences in respect of<br />
morphometric characters between the genders analysis of variance (ANOVA) has<br />
been used.<br />
Absolute and relative frequences (%) of the conditions of qualitative traits have<br />
been established. Qualitative traits have been analysed also through the<br />
corresponding analyses.
105<br />
Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Morphometric Characters<br />
Former data on values of morphometric characters of the species Bufo bufo are<br />
rather insufficient, or, some of them have been given only descriptively. That is why<br />
we have presented here the average values for a large number of characters that<br />
have not been previously analyzed and data about that do not exist in the literature.<br />
Basic parameters of morphometric characters descriptive statistics have been<br />
presented separately by sexes in the table 2. The smallest male of the sample of the<br />
population from Biogradsko Lake is 64.28, and the largest one 82.54 mm. The<br />
smallest female is 90.94 mm, and the largest 109.94 mm. Obtained values of body<br />
size of common toad from Biogradsko Lake are within the limits of the so far recorded<br />
values from other parts of areal of the species. (R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; A r n o l d and<br />
B u r t o n , 1978; Đ urović et al, 1979 etc).<br />
Sexual dimorphism has been analyzed in scope of population (localities) by<br />
application of Tukey test for samples of unequal size (“Unequal N HSD Tukey” test).<br />
This test has shown an expressed sexual dimorphism, where the females have higher<br />
average values of analyzed traits (Table 2). On basis of calculated parameters of<br />
descriptive statistics, separately by sexes and on basis of compared differences<br />
between the sexes, it has been established that the females have statistically higher<br />
values of all the characters, especially when the word is about L – body length, Lpa –<br />
length of front extremity, Lc – head length, Ltc – head width, Lg – length of salivary<br />
glands, weigth.<br />
With the population of Biogradsko Lake a great number of traits that have been<br />
demonstrating sexual dimorphism by the analysis of basic data where the size has<br />
been included, indicate the absence of sexual dimorphism for the largest number of<br />
characters when body size is excluded. The charactereistics which demonstrate the<br />
presence of sexual dimorphism also after the eliminating body size are T- length of<br />
tibiofibula and F – length of femur.<br />
Females are bigger than males in a large number of amphibian species<br />
(S h i n e , 1979; M i a u d et al., 1999; K h o n s u e et al.., 2001a, 2002b; M o n n e t and<br />
C h e r r y , 2002). That has been especially expressed with tailless amphibians in<br />
which females are bigger than males with 90% of species (S h i n e , 1979). This has<br />
also been established in this paper for studied population from Biogradsko Lake, as<br />
well as for the populations of the remaining part of the areal of distribution of this<br />
species (G i t t i n s et al., 1980; H e m e l a a r , 1988). The most common explanation of<br />
sexual dimorphism in body size is the advantge the females have in respect of eggs<br />
production (H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; C v e t k o v i ć et al., 2003). Namely,<br />
there is a positive correlation in many groups between body length and fecundity<br />
(C u m m i n s , 1986; B e r v e n , 1988; S i n s c h , 1998; G i b b o n s and M c C a r t h y ,<br />
1986). Assumption is that the selection, owing to a pointed correlation of body length
106<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Males Females sexual dimorphism<br />
Unequal N HSD (Tukey)<br />
Trait N Means SD SE Min Max N Means SD SE Min Max basic data/standard results<br />
L 26 73.71 4.1447 0.8128 64.28 82.54 15 100.64 5.0865 1.3133 90.94 109.94 ***<br />
Lpa 26 54.62 3.6473 0.7153 46.68 63.17 15 71.64 3.7562 0.9699 62.23 77.60 ***/ns<br />
F 26 32.53 3.1809 0.6238 25.32 38.86 15 40.67 4.9746 1.2844 31.98 46.95 ***/***<br />
T 26 24.10 2.0556 0.4031 20.52 27.25 15 28.82 2.4023 0.6203 25.55 34.46 ***/**<br />
P 26 36.65 4.2990 0.8431 27.03 42.91 15 42.98 2.8349 0.7320 37.06 47.03 **/ns<br />
n 26 51.90 4.6742 0.9167 43.30 60.54 15 62.52 4.8611 1.2551 56.26 72.83 ***/ns<br />
n-P 26 15.25 4.0443 0.7931 7.26 22.45 15 19.54 4.4970 1.1611 12.24 27.70 **<br />
DpPa 26 6.58 0.7584 0.1487 5.10 7.99 15 10.44 1.5234 0.3933 7.48 13.45 ***<br />
DpPp 26 6.74 0.8867 0.1739 5.29 8.63 15 8.46 1.2908 0.3333 5.85 10.79 ***<br />
Cint 26 4.53 0.5892 0.1155 3.37 5.56 15 6.34 0.9030 0.2331 4.51 7.74 ***<br />
Lc 26 17.50 1.1857 0.2325 14.28 19.46 15 24.69 1.6894 0.4362 22.04 27.83 ***/ns<br />
Ltc 26 22.41 1.5435 0.3027 19.67 24.73 15 31.19 2.0888 0.5393 28.09 36.37 ***/ns<br />
Spp 26 8.75 0.9524 0.1868 6.72 10.92 15 12.55 1.6316 0.4213 9.75 15.07 ***<br />
Spi 26 4.03 0.5097 0.1000 2.85 4.92 15 5.32 0.6099 0.1575 4.39 6.47 ***<br />
Spcr 26 7.49 0.5751 0.1128 6.28 8.62 15 11.82 0.9789 0.2528 10.28 14.21 ***<br />
Lo 26 6.25 0.6112 0.1199 4.95 7.43 15 9.28 0.7010 0.1810 7.61 10.27 ***<br />
Ltp 26 5.88 0.6321 0.1240 4.32 6.71 15 7.80 0.8845 0.2284 5.72 9.61 ***<br />
Dro 26 7.54 0.5957 0.1168 6.27 8.75 15 10.72 0.8648 0.2233 9.42 12.33 ***<br />
Dno 26 3.22 0.3864 0.0758 2.59 4.08 15 4.49 0.5739 0.1482 3.54 5.41 ***<br />
Lh 26 3.56 0.5723 0.1122 2.65 4.77 15 5.09 0.3795 0.0980 4.49 5.81 ***<br />
Lg 26 14.86 1.7528 0.3438 11.78 18.10 15 20.77 2.2236 0.5741 17.04 24.34 ***<br />
Wg 26 5.80 0.7387 0.1449 4.53 7.50 15 8.20 1.0614 0.2741 6.48 10.06 ***<br />
Weight 26 44.50 6.4576 1.2664 33.00 56.00 15 141.07 31.1367 8.0395 97.00 230.00 ***<br />
Table 2. Basic parameters of descriptive statistics of males and females of Biogradsko Lake and Tukey (HSD) test with gender factor
107<br />
Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />
and fecundiy, favorises several values for body length of females. Greater eggs<br />
production on the other hand is explained by larger internal space for their storage,<br />
which larger females have (A n d e r s o n , 1994).<br />
The direction and magnitude of dimorphism in body length depend of various<br />
selective pressures the specimens of male and female sex are exposed to. D a r w i n<br />
(1871) assumed that sexual selection (though the competition among the specimens<br />
of the same sex or through an active selection of partner), may lead to sexual<br />
dimorphism. For instance, in species with pointed struggles among the males, males<br />
are frequently bigger than females.<br />
However, it is important to underline that common toad is one of rare secies in<br />
which males are a smaller sex, although there are struggles for females among them<br />
(H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; A r a k , 1988).<br />
Qualitative Analysis<br />
By a comparison of rerlative frequency of condition of monitored qualitative traits<br />
it has been noted that the same conditions, as a rule, have the greatest frequency<br />
both in the sample of males and in the sample of females (Tabele 3). The exception is<br />
the convexity of of warts in head region (in males the largest relative frequency have<br />
the warts which are indented, and with females warts are very protuberant) and the<br />
appearance of thornlike endings of ventral side of head region (most frequently weakly<br />
expressed in males and averagely expressed in females). The table of relative<br />
frequency of the conditions indicates that with females the variability of condition is<br />
higher than with males.<br />
By a correspondant analysis we have monitored the impact of qualitative traits<br />
on ordination of specimens of both sexes. The first corresponding axis has separated<br />
24.69% of variability, and the other one 17.03%. There is no clear sex separation<br />
(Figure 1). The sample of males indicates an uniformity in respect of monitored traits.<br />
Only one male has been separated during the second coresponding axis from the<br />
„main cloud” of male specimens on basis of two traits (11b and 12b) (Figure 2). One<br />
may observe a higher variability in scope of the sample of females. Traits 1c, 4b and<br />
5a separate two females along the first correspoding axis from other females, where it<br />
should be mentioned that these two traits as well as the traits 2a, 3b and 6b influence<br />
separating of females from males (Figures 1 and 2).<br />
The significance of this paper is in presenting for the first time the analysis of a<br />
larger number of morphometric and qualitative characters of population of the species<br />
Bufo bufo from Biogradsko Lake. These data make the grounds for further<br />
investigations of the populations of the species Bufo bufo both from Biogradsko Lake<br />
and the populations of this species from the territory of entire ontenegro.
108<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
LITERATURE<br />
ANANJEVA, N., BORKIN, L., DAREVSKIJ, I. & ORLOV, N. 1998: Zemnovodnie i<br />
presmikajuščiesja. - Enciklopedija prirodi Rosii. ABF, Moskva, pp. 574.<br />
ARNOLD, E.N., BURTON, J.A. 1978: A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of<br />
Britain and Europe. – Collins, London<br />
ARAK, A. 1988: Sexual Dimorphism in Body Size: A Model and a Test. - Evolution 42:<br />
820-825.<br />
ANDERSON, S. 1994: Sexual Selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton, New<br />
Jersey.<br />
BERVEN, K.A. 1988: Factors Affecting Variation in Reproductive Traits within a<br />
Population of Wood Frogs Rana sylvatica. - Copeia, 1988: 605-615.<br />
BORKIN, L.J., VEITH, M.1997: Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). In: GASC, J. P., GABELA,<br />
A., CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIĆ, J., DOLMEN, D.,GROSSENBACHER, K.,<br />
HAFFNER, P., LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ RICA, J.P., MAURIN,<br />
J., OLIVIERA, M.E., SOFIANIDOU, T.S., VEITH, M., ZUIDEREWIJK, A. (eds),<br />
1997. Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Pp. 118-119. Societas<br />
Europaea Herpetologica & Muséum National d'Historie Naturelle (IEGB/SPN),<br />
Paris.<br />
CVETKOVIĆ, D., ALEKSIĆ, I., CRNOBRNJA – ISAILOVIĆ, J. 2003: Reproductive<br />
Traits in Common Toad Bufo bufo from the Vicinity of Belgrade. - Archives of<br />
Biological Sciences, Belgrade 55: 25P-26P.<br />
CUMMINS, C.P. 1986: Temporal and Spatial Variation in Egg size and Fecundity in<br />
Rana temporaria. - Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 303 – 316.<br />
DARWIN, C. 1871: The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. – Murray,<br />
London.<br />
ĐUROVIĆ, E., VUKOVIĆ, T., POCRNJIĆ, Z. 1979: Vodozemci Bosne i Hercegovine. -<br />
Zemaljski <strong>muzej</strong> BiH, Sarajevo.<br />
GITTINS, S.P., PARKER, A.G., SLATER, F.M. 1980: Population Traits of the Common<br />
Toad (Bufo bufo) Visiting a Breeding Site in mid- Wales. - Journal of Animal<br />
Ecology, 49: 161-173.<br />
HALLIDAY, T.R., VERRELL, P.A. 1986: Sexual Selection and Body Size in<br />
Amphibians. - Herpetological Journal, 1: 86 – 92.<br />
HEMELAAR, A.S.M. 1988: Age, Growth and other Population Traits of Bufo bufo from<br />
Different Latitudes and Altitudes. - Journal of Herpetology, 22: 369-388.<br />
JOHANNESSEN, T.W. 1970: The Climate of Scandinavia. In: C. C. Wallen (ed), World<br />
KUZMIN, S.L. 1999a. Zemnovodnie bivšego SSSR. Tovariščestvo naučnih izdanij<br />
KMK, Moskva.<br />
KUZMIN, S.L. 1999b: The Amphibians of the former Soviet Union. Vol. I. - Pensoft,<br />
Sofia/Moscow.
109<br />
Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />
MIAUD, C., GUYETANT, R., ELMBERG, J. 1999: Variations in Life-history Traits in the<br />
Common Frog Rana temporaria (Amphibia: Anura): a Literature Review and New<br />
Data from the French Alps. - Journal of Zoology, 249: 61-73.<br />
MONNET, J. M., CHERRY, M. 2002: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Anurans. -<br />
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 269:<br />
2301 – 2307.<br />
ORLOVA, V.F. & TUNIYEV, B.S. 1989: On the Taxonomy of the Caucasian Common<br />
Toads Belonging to the Group Bufo bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas) (Amphibia,<br />
Anura, Bufonidae). - Biol. MOIP, Otd. biol., 94 (3): 13-24.<br />
PASTEUR, G. & BONS, J. (1959): Les Batraciens du Maroc. - Travaux de l'Institut<br />
Scientifique Cherifien, Serie Zoologique No 17, pp. 240. Rabat.<br />
RADOVANOVIĆ, M. 1951. Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />
Beograd.<br />
SINSCH, U. 1998. Biologie und Okologie der Kreuzkrote (Bufo calamita). - Laurenti,<br />
Bochum.<br />
SHINE, R. 1979. Sexual Selection and Sexual Dimorphism in the Amphibia. – Copeia,<br />
2: 297 – 306.<br />
Received: 20.10.2007.
110<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:111-114<br />
A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo<br />
bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />
Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹<br />
¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />
Key words:<br />
Bufo bufo,<br />
distribution,<br />
Montenegro<br />
SYNOPSIS<br />
During the herpetological investigations in period 2001-2004<br />
a voluminous material was collected. On various localities in<br />
Montenegro we have collected the species Bufo bufo (Common<br />
Toad), for which there are no relevant literature data for the territory<br />
of Montenegro. This taxon is only reported for Bukumirsko jezero<br />
(lake) by prof. Radovanović (1951) za Durmitor, Skadarsko jezero,<br />
Lovćen, Biogradska gora (Džukić, 1991; 1995).<br />
A list of localities on which Common Toad has been<br />
collected as well asd UTM map with marked localities have been<br />
presented in the paper.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Bufo bufo,<br />
rasprostranjenje,<br />
Crna Gora<br />
SINOPSIS<br />
PRILOG POZNAVANJU RASPROSTRANJENJA<br />
VRSTE Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) u CRNOJ GORI<br />
Tokom herpetoloških istraživanja u periodu od 2001-2004.<br />
godine sakupljen je obiman materijal. Na različitim lokalitetima u<br />
Crnoj Gori sakupili smo vrstu Bufo bufo (krastavu žabu), za koju ne<br />
postoje relevantni podaci u literaturi za teritoriju <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Ovaj<br />
takson navodi se jedino za Bukumirsko jezero od strane prof.<br />
Radovanovića (1951.)<br />
U radu je naveden spisak lokaliteta na kojima je sakupljena<br />
krastava žaba kao i UTM karta sa unešenim lokalitetima.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Bufo bufo is the biggest frog both in our region and in entire Europe<br />
(Radovanović , 1951). Adults of this species are to 15 cm long, with marked<br />
geographical variability in size. Females are significantly bigger than males. In course<br />
of multipliation migrations Bufo bufo covers large distances and it is considered tht it<br />
is one of the most migratory speces of tailless amphibians which may cover a<br />
distance up to 3000 m, what indicates an markedly dispersion potential of the
112<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
specimens of this species (S e m l i t c h and B o d i e , 2003). For the time being,<br />
common Common Toads are the only amphibians which, at the level of adult<br />
specimens may also undertake vertical migrations ofseveral hundreds meters<br />
(S z t a t e c s n y and S c h a b e t s b e r g e r , 2005).<br />
LIST OF LOCALITIES ON WHICH COMMON TOAD HAS BEEN RECORDED<br />
1. Skadar Lake CM 5.7<br />
2. The Crnojevića River CM 3.9<br />
3. Lješanska nahija CM 4.9<br />
4. Velje Brdo CN 5.0<br />
5. Kuči CN 7.0<br />
6. Piperi CN 5.1<br />
7. Bjelopavlići CN 4.1<br />
8. Prekornica CN 5.3<br />
9. Mateševo CN 7.3<br />
10. Biogradsko Lake CN 8.4<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Field investigations have been discontinued, as they mainly depended on<br />
weather conditions.<br />
The greatest part of the materiala has mainly been collected in mating period<br />
since at that time a large number of specimens gather at one spot imediately after the<br />
rain, or when the humidity is high. Material has mainly been collected by hand and a<br />
meredov (a net with a handle).<br />
This material has been subjected to morphometric analyses which will be<br />
described in some other paper.<br />
The material has been deposited in herpetological collection of the Natural<br />
History Museum in Podgorici and it is kept in 70% alcohol.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
So far there have been no relevan data in the literature about the distribution<br />
of this species on the territory of Montenegro. This taxon is reported only for<br />
Bukumirsko Lake by R a d o v a n o v i ć (1951). On basis of the list of localities we may<br />
state that this species is widely distibuted on the territory of Montenegro, but it is also<br />
endangered.
113<br />
Čađenović: A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION . . .<br />
C M 0 9<br />
BP<br />
CP<br />
DP<br />
BN<br />
CN<br />
DN<br />
BM<br />
CM<br />
DM
114<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
LITERATURE<br />
DžUKIĆ , G. 1991: Vodozemci i gmizavci. – Građa za faunu vodozemaca i<br />
gmizavaca Durmitora. In: Nonveiller, G. (ed.) Fauna Durmitora. CANU, Posebna<br />
izdanja 24, Odjeljenje prir. Nauka 15, Sveska 4: 9-78.<br />
DžUKIĆ , G., V U Č KOVIĆ , M., N I K Č EVIĆ , J., M A R I Ć , D., V I Z I , O. 1995:<br />
Revizija bazne studije za prostorni plan. Bazna studija "Flora i Fauna". -<br />
Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode, Podgorica.<br />
RADOVANOVIĆ , M. 1951: Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />
Beograd: 46-48.<br />
S E M L I T S C H , R.D., B O D I E , J.R. 2003: Biological criteria for buffer zones around<br />
wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. - Conservation<br />
Biology, 17: 1219-1228.<br />
S Z T A T E C S N Y , M., S C H A B E T S B E R G E R , R. 2005: Into thin air: vertical<br />
migration, body condition, and quality of terrestrial habitats of alpine common<br />
toads, Bufo bufo. - Cannadian Journal of Zoology, 83: 788-796.<br />
Received: 20.10.2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:115-122<br />
MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR<br />
ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA:<br />
LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN (MONTENEGRO)<br />
Lidija P O L O V I Ć 1 , Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ 2<br />
1<br />
The Natural History Museum of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, e-mail: lidijapolo@cg.yu<br />
2<br />
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute for Biological Research „Siniša Stanković“, 11060<br />
Belgrade, Serbia<br />
Key words:<br />
Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis,<br />
morphological<br />
characteristics<br />
Synopsis<br />
External morphological traits of the Mosor rock lizard,<br />
Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Lovćen<br />
mountain (Montenegro) were examined. The results of<br />
Descriptive statistics for 14 morphometric, 21 meristic and<br />
percentages of states for eight qualitative traits were<br />
presented. Results are discussed in comparison with the<br />
literature data for other populations.<br />
Ključne riječi:<br />
Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis,<br />
morfološke<br />
karakteristike<br />
Sinopsis<br />
MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE POPULACIJE<br />
MOSORSKOG GUŠTERA (DINAROLACERTA MOSORENSIS<br />
KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) SA<br />
PLANINE LOVĆEN, CRNA GORA<br />
U ovom radu analizirane su spoljašnje morfološke<br />
odlike populacije mosorskog guštera Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) sa planine Lovćen.<br />
Predstavljeni su rezultati deskriptivne statističke analize 14<br />
morfometrijskih, 21 merističkog i procentualna zastupljenost<br />
stanja osam kvalitativnih karaktera. Rezultati su upoređeni sa<br />
postojećim literaturnim podacima za ostale populacije ove<br />
vrste.
116<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The Mosor rock lizard Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović , 1886),<br />
previously Lacerta mosorensis (see A r n o l d et al., 2007) represents both a relict<br />
and a steno-endemic species of the Balkan Peninsula (e.g. C r n o b r nj a –<br />
Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997). Its distribution is restricted to the south-western<br />
Dinaric mountain karst in Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro, exposed to<br />
the influence of the Mediterranean climate. There, it is patchily distributed, restricted<br />
to altitudes ranging between 450 and 1900 m (Dž u k i ć, 1989; C r n o b r nj a –<br />
Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997).<br />
The Lovćen population of the Mosor rock lizard is located at the south-eastern<br />
boundary of the distribution range. Here it occupies altitudes from 1200 to 1350 m<br />
inhabiting the cliffs and blocks of rocks surrounded by subalpine beech forest (plant<br />
community Fagetum montenegrinum subalpinum) with whitebark pine (Pinus<br />
heldreichii) as the differential species (T o m i ć – S t a n k o v i ć, 1970;<br />
Ljubisavljević et al., in press).<br />
Up until very recently D. mosorensis was one of the least studied<br />
representatives of the European herpetofauna (Dž u k i ć, 1989; O d i e r n a and<br />
A r r i b a s , 2005). However, the latest studies have revealed substantial morphological<br />
and genetic differences among populations of the Mosor rock lizard (C a r r a n z a et<br />
al., 2004; Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., 2007) and certain peculiarities in life-history<br />
traits (Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., in press).<br />
Although specimens from the Lovćen population were included in some of these<br />
studies, complete descriptive data on morphological characters have not been<br />
published until now.<br />
Dinarolacerta mosorens-adult specimen
117<br />
Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Analyses were carried out on the samples collected from localities Ivanova<br />
korita (42° 22’ N, 18°50’ E) and Međuvršje (42°24’ N, 18°50’ E) in the Lovćen mt. A<br />
total of 22 adult males, 23 females, 2 immature males and 5 immature females were<br />
examined. Specimens preserved in 70% ethanol were from Dr Georg Džukić's<br />
Herpetological Collection of the Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade (Međuvršje<br />
locality), and the Herpetological Collection of the Natural History Museum of<br />
Montenegro, Podgorica (Ivanova korita locality). Specimens were examined for the<br />
following characters:<br />
Morphometric characters: Tot – total length, Lcor – snout-vent length, Lcap –<br />
head length, Ltcap - head width, Altcap - head height, Lfo – mouth length, Ltfo –<br />
mouth width, Lpa – forelimb length, Lpp – hindlimb length, Ldg – length of fourth toe<br />
on hindlimb, Lpil – pileus length, Ltpil – pileus width, Doa – orbit to ear distance, Pap<br />
– distance between fore and hind limbs.<br />
Meristic characters included the numbers of: SOC – supraocular scales, CIL -<br />
supraciliary scales, GRA - supraciliary granules, POC – postocular scales, TMP –<br />
temporal scales, STM - supratemporal scales, PNS - postnasal scales, 1LO - first<br />
loreal scales, 2LO second loreal scales, PROC - praeocular scales, SLB- supralabial<br />
scales anterior to subocular, SUB - sublabial scales, SMX - submaxilar scales, GUL -<br />
gular scales along the throat midline, COL – large collar scales, VENT – inner ventral<br />
scales counted longitudinally, DOR – dorsal scales around mid-body, PAN – praeanal<br />
scales surrounding anteriorly the anal plate, FPO – femoral pores, FEM – femural<br />
scales, SDG – lamellar scales under the fourth toe.<br />
Qualitative characters: (I) masseteric plate: a—single, b—divided, c—indistinct.<br />
(II) row of supraciliary granules: a—complete; b—incomplete (included cases when<br />
only one granula was separated from the rest). (III) additional scale between the first<br />
postocular 1POC and the last supraocular 4SOC scale: a—present, b— absent. (IV)<br />
multiplication of supralabials anterior to subocular scale: a—by insertion of additional<br />
small scales, b—by vertical splitting of scales, c—state of four supralabials. (V) type<br />
of dorsal pattern: a—diffuse, scattered spots, b—diffuse, interconnected spots in more<br />
or less reticulate pattern, c—banded pattern, spots arranged in a single vertebral<br />
and/or two narrow juxtaposed paravertebral bands, d—banded pattern, broad<br />
vertebral band consisting of scattered spots, e—absent. (VI) spots of the dorsal<br />
pattern: a—large, b—medium, c—small, d—absent. (VII) areas of background color<br />
free of dark pattern: a—broad, b—narrow, c—absent. (VIII) lateral bands: a—distinct,<br />
b—indistinct. The band names of dorsal pattern were according to A r n o l d and<br />
B u r t o n (1978).<br />
Symetrical characters were taken from both sides of the body. Data processing<br />
concerned the mean of the right and left values for quantitative traits, while for<br />
qualitative traits a combination of both sides was used.<br />
The body and head dimensions were taken with digital callipers to the nearest<br />
0.01 mm. Scale counts were taken under a stereoscopic microscope. For<br />
morphometric and qualitative characters, statistical analyses included only mature
118<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
individuals, while for analysis of the scalation, adults and immature individuals were<br />
pooled.<br />
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard error, range) for quantitative traits, and<br />
percentages of states for each qualitative trait were calculated. Statistical analyses<br />
were carried out using the computer package Statistica (STATISTICA for Windows.<br />
StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Quantitative traits<br />
Descriptive statistics of morphometric and meristic characters of adult males and<br />
females are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Maximum total length recorded was 205 mm<br />
and 197 mm for males and females, respectively. These values are smaller than those<br />
previously reported for the species as a whole (up to 220 mm, B i s c h o f f, 1984),<br />
and Herzegovinian population (222 mm, V e i t h, 1991). However, it should be noted<br />
that due to the great number of regenerating individuals, we could analyse total length<br />
on a small sample. Our measures showed that snout-vent length (Lcor) values for<br />
females were between 56.3 – 70.7 mm ( x = 63.8 mm ± 0.8), and for males were<br />
between 59.5 – 71.1 mm ( x = 65.5 mm ± 0.7). While female data were mainly in<br />
accordance with literature data (57 - 64.4 - 68 mm, Bischoff, 1984), males showed<br />
greater mean Lcor than previously reported (51 – 62.3 - 68 mm Bischoff, 1984). No<br />
concrete literature data are available regarding the other morphometric characters<br />
here analysed.<br />
males<br />
females<br />
Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />
Tot 5 192.00 179.00 205.00 4.54 6 176.17 160.00 197.00 5.63<br />
Lcor 22 65.53 59.53 71.08 0.67 23 63.76 56.34 70.72 0.82<br />
Lcap 22 16.85 15.67 17.62 0.14 23 14.41 13.46 15.71 0.12<br />
Ltcap 22 10.37 9.03 11.68 0.15 23 8.79 7.80 9.74 0.10<br />
Altcap 22 6.75 5.54 8.33 0.16 23 5.49 5.02 6.06 0.07<br />
Lfo 22 12.77 11.62 13.59 0.12 23 11.07 10.35 12.05 0.10<br />
Ltfo 22 9.82 8.67 10.90 0.15 23 8.30 7.30 9.33 0.09<br />
Lpa 22 22.79 20.94 24.58 0.19 23 20.23 18.72 22.10 0.18<br />
Lpp 22 36.06 32.70 40.57 0.39 23 31.39 29.73 34.37 0.25<br />
Ldg 22 11.39 10.63 12.80 0.11 23 10.15 9.15 11.08 0.10<br />
Lpil 22 15.66 14.37 16.43 0.14 23 13.41 12.60 14.58 0.11<br />
Ltpil 22 6.85 6.30 7.30 0.06 23 6.01 5.50 6.60 0.06<br />
Doa 22 5.12 4.60 5.65 0.07 23 3.96 3.50 4.60 0.05<br />
Pap 22 29.01 25.85 31.96 0.36 23 32.16 25.82 38.24 0.63<br />
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of 14 morphometric characters of adult male and female<br />
Dinarolacerta mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm),<br />
range, standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.
119<br />
Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />
Concerning meristic characters, the mean number of four supraocular scales<br />
and variation range of supraciliary scales were in agreement with literature data (CIL:<br />
5 – 8, Bischoff, 1984), while the number of supraciliary granules varied (especially in<br />
females) in a broader range than it was previously described for this species (GRA: 8<br />
– 12, Bischoff, 1984). The most frequently detected number of two postnasals (PNS)<br />
in our sample was in agreement with previous studies (M é h e l y, 1903;<br />
Radovanović , 1951; B i s c h o f f , 1984; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002; A r n o<br />
l d et al., 2007). The number of loreal (1LO, 2LO) and praeocular scales (PROC)<br />
varied from 1 – 2, although individuals with single-scale state were the most frequent<br />
in our sample. Previous literature data (B i s c h o f f, 1984) also showed single state<br />
of these scales as characteristic for this species. The usual number of four or five<br />
supralabial scales (SLB) in front of the subocular (with possibility of an asymmetric<br />
condition), as well as usual number of six sublabial (SUB) and submaxilar scales<br />
(SMX) reported for D. mosorensis by other authors (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; B i s<br />
c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007) were in agreement with our results. However,<br />
the number of gular (GUL), dorsal (DOR) and subdigital scales (SDG) varied in<br />
broader range than previously recorded (GUL: 23 - 30; DOR: 36 - 40 - 45; SDG: 22 –<br />
23,4 - 25 in B i s c h o f f, 1984). The mean values and/or variation range for other<br />
analysed meristic characters were mainly in agreement with those previously reported<br />
for this species (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984).<br />
males<br />
females<br />
Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />
SOC 24 4.02 4.00 4.50 0.02 28 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00<br />
CIL 24 5.94 4.50 7.00 0.15 28 6.09 5.50 8.00 0.12<br />
GRA 24 9.17 7.00 11.50 0.25 28 8.65 5.00 12.00 0.29<br />
POC 24 3.81 2.50 4.00 0.08 28 3.52 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />
TMP 24 42.23 24.50 73.00 2.07 28 39.09 25.00 54.00 1.69<br />
STM 24 2.52 1.50 3.50 0.11 28 2.35 2.00 3.00 0.07<br />
PNS 24 1.88 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.96 1.50 2.00 0.03<br />
1LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.02 1.00 1.50 0.02<br />
2LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.05<br />
PROC 24 1.13 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.04<br />
SLB 24 4.69 4.00 5.50 0.12 28 4.57 3.50 5.00 0.08<br />
SUB 24 6.02 4.50 7.00 0.11 28 6.04 5.00 7.00 0.10<br />
SMX 24 5.96 5.50 6.00 0.03 28 5.78 5.00 6.00 0.08<br />
GUL 24 25.88 20.00 32.00 0.52 28 24.48 19.00 28.00 0.40<br />
COL 24 8.83 6.00 10.00 0.21 28 8.67 7.00 11.00 0.22<br />
VENT 24 25.25 23.50 27.50 0.23 28 26.72 25.00 29.00 0.21<br />
DOR 24 39.06 33.00 44.00 0.66 28 38.46 30.50 43.00 0.59<br />
PAN 24 7.71 6.00 9.00 0.13 28 7.30 6.90 9.00 0.18<br />
FPO 24 18.35 16.50 21.00 0.23 28 17.19 12.00 20.50 0.32<br />
FEM 24 4.00 3.00 5.00 0.11 28 3.67 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />
SDG 24 22.29 20.00 24.50 0.24 28 21.96 20.00 25.50 0.26<br />
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of 21 meristic characters of adult male and female Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm), range,<br />
standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.
120<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
males<br />
(N = 22)<br />
females<br />
(N = 23)<br />
males<br />
(N = 22)<br />
females<br />
(N = 23)<br />
character % % character % %<br />
Iaa 68 65 VIa 73 83<br />
Iab 5 4 VIb 9 13<br />
Iac 9 22 VIc 9 4<br />
Ibb 0 0 VId 9 0<br />
Ibc 0 0 VIIa 5 4<br />
Icc 18 9 VIIb 0 9<br />
IIaa 68 57 VIIc 95 87<br />
IIab 14 13 VIIIa 5 35<br />
IIbb 18 30 VIIIb 95 65<br />
IIIaa 0 0<br />
IIIab 5 4<br />
IIIbb 95 96<br />
IVaa 0 0<br />
IVab 5 4<br />
IVac 5 9<br />
IVbb 41 35<br />
IVbc 23 26<br />
IVcc 27 26<br />
Va 23 46<br />
Vb 64 46<br />
Vc 5 13<br />
Vd 0 0<br />
Ve 9 0<br />
Table 3. Percentages of states of qualitative traits (in %) in Dinarolacerta mosorensis of<br />
the Lovć en population. For symmetrical traits combination of states for both body sides<br />
were given. Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.<br />
Qualitative traits<br />
Percentages of states for qualitative traits of adult males and females are<br />
presented in Table 3. In general, analysed individuals are characterised by the<br />
presence of single masseteric plate (Ia), complete row of supraciliary granules (IIa),<br />
absence of additional scale between the first postocular and the last supraocular<br />
scale (IIIb), and symmetrical multiplication of supralabials by vertical partition of<br />
scales (IVbb). Concerning the type of dorsal pattern, they are distinguished by<br />
predominance of diffuse type consisting of large size spots coupled with indistinct<br />
lateral bands (Va,b; VIa; VIIIb) and the absence of areas of background color free of<br />
dark pattern (VIIc). The diffuse pattern with interconnected spots in more or less<br />
reticulate pattern was predominant in males (Vb), while in females reticulate pattern<br />
(Vb) and scattered spots (Va) were present in the same percentage. A certain<br />
percentage of individuals of both sexes with symmetrical presence of an indistinct<br />
masseteric plate (Icc), and complete absence of dorsal pattern (males) (Ve, VId) were<br />
also recorded from Lovćen population.
121<br />
Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />
Concerning the qualitative traits, the prevalence of specimens with distinct<br />
masseteric plate, complete row of supraciliary granules and diffuse reticulate pattern<br />
found in this study were also considered characteristic for the Mosor rock lizard (R a d<br />
o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007). On the other hand,<br />
we rarely found unmarked (uniform) specimens, the feature frequently referred to D.<br />
mosorensis by other authors (T o m a s s i n i, 1889; B i s c h o f f, 1984; V e i t h,<br />
1991; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Most of the values or percentages of occurrences obtained from the present<br />
analysis of external morphology of the Mosor rock lizard are in accordance (or within<br />
the variation range) with previous studies of the species. However, the number of<br />
supraciliary granules, supralabial, gular, dorsal and subdigital scales varied in<br />
somewhat broader range than it was previously reported for a species as a whole.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
We are grateful to Georg Džukić for useful comments and making part of literature and<br />
sample collection available to us. We also thank Miloš Kalezić for helpful suggestions. Katarina<br />
Ljubisavljević was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science (grant no. 143052, “Patterns of<br />
amphibian and reptile diversity on the Balkan Peninsula”).<br />
LITERATURE<br />
A R N O L D, E. N., and J. A. B U R T O N. (1978). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />
Amphibians of Britain and Europe. - Harper Collins Publishers, London, UK, 1-272.<br />
A R N O L D, E. N., and D. O V E N D E N (2002). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />
Amphibians of Britain and Europe. Second Edition. - HarperCollins Publishers, London,<br />
UK, 1-288.<br />
A R N O L D, E. N., A R R I B A S, O., and S. C A R R A N Z A (2007). Systematics of the<br />
Palaearctic and Oriental Lizard Tribe Lacertini (Squamata: Lacertidae: Lacertinae), with<br />
Descriptions of Eight New Genera. - Zootaxa 1430, 1-86.<br />
B I S C H O F F, W. (1984). Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886, Mosor-Eidechse, In:<br />
Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, 2-1, Echsen II, Lacerta (Ed. W. Böhme),<br />
290-300. Aula -Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.<br />
C A R R A N Z A, S., A R N O L D, E. N., and F. A M A T (2004). DNA Phylogeny of Lacerta<br />
(Iberolacerta) and other Lacertine Lizards (Reptilia:Lacertidae): Did Competition Cause<br />
Long-term Restriction?. - Systematics and Biodiversity 2, 57-77.<br />
C R N O B R N J A – I S A I L O V I Ć, J., and G. DŽ U K I Ć (1997). Lacerta mosorensis. In:<br />
Atlas of the Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe (Eds. J. P. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Crnobrnja-
122<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Isailović, D. Dolmen, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. P.<br />
Martýnez Rica, H. Maurin, M. E. Oliveira T. S. Sofianidou, M. Veith, and A. Zuiderwijk),<br />
250-251. Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum Nationall d’ Histoire Naturelle,<br />
Paris.<br />
DŽ U K I Ć, G. (1989). Remarks on Distribution and Protection Problems of the Mosor Rock<br />
Lizard, Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886 (Reptilia, Lacertidae). - Biologia Gallohelenica<br />
15,185-190.<br />
LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., A R R I B A S, O., DŽ U K I Ć, G. and S. C A R R A N Z A<br />
(2007). Genetic and Morphological Differentiation of Mosor Rock Lizards, Dinarolacerta<br />
mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886), with the Description of a New Species from the<br />
Prokletije Mountain Massif (Montenegro) (Squamata: Lacertidae). - Zootaxa 1613,1-22.<br />
LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., P O L O V I Ć, L., T O M A Š E V I Ć – K O L A R O V, N.,<br />
DŽUKIĆ , G., and M. L. K A L E Z I Ć. Female Life-history Characteristics of the Mosor<br />
Rock Lizard, Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Montenegro<br />
(Squamata: Lacertidae). - J. Nat. Hist., in press.<br />
M É H E L Y, L. (1903). Lacerta mosorensis Kolomb., a Magyar királyság új gyikja,<br />
származástani kapcsolatában. - Állattani Közlemények, Budapest, 212 pp.<br />
O D I E R N A, G. and O. A R R I B A S (2005). The Karyology of ‘Lacerta’ mosorensis<br />
Kolombatovic, 1886, and Its Bearing on Phylogenetic Relationships to other European<br />
Mountain Lizards. - Ital. J. Zool. 72, 93-96.<br />
R A D O V A N O V I Ć, M. (1951). Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />
Beograd, 1-249.<br />
T O M A S S I N I, O. (1889). Crtice o životu gmazova koji žive u Bosni i Hercegovini. - Glasnik<br />
Zem. muz. u B. i H. 1, 46-60.<br />
T O M I Ć – S T A N K O V I Ć, K. (1970). Flora Lovćena I. - Zbornik Filozofskog Fakulteta u<br />
Prištini, 7,1-39.<br />
V E I T H, G. (1991). Die Reptilien Bosniens und der Herzegowina, teil I. Herpetozoa 3, 97-196.<br />
Received: 12. 11. 2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:123-129<br />
CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES:<br />
PHENOLIC ACIDS, FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />
Nebojša J O C K O V I Ć 1 , Milica P A V L O V I Ć 1 , Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ 2, * and<br />
Nada K O V A Č EVIĆ 1<br />
1<br />
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11000<br />
Belgrade, Serbia<br />
2<br />
Institute of Botany and Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000<br />
Belgrade, Serbia<br />
* corresponding author: marko@worldpost.eu<br />
Key Words:<br />
Bryophyte chemistry,<br />
mosses,<br />
liverworts,<br />
phenolic acids,<br />
flavonoids,<br />
triterpenes,<br />
alkaloids<br />
Synopsis<br />
In this paper preliminary study of chemical constituents<br />
of three bryophyte species will be presented. Gametophytes<br />
of Polytrichum formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mosses) and<br />
Pellia endiviifolia (liverworth) have been collected in the<br />
native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia). TLC<br />
technique was applied for the preliminary study of petroleum<br />
ether and methanol extracts of three investigated species.<br />
According to this assay the presence of flavonoids (aglycones<br />
and glycosides) in all examined extracts was confirmed. In extracts<br />
of two species phenolic acids were detected. Besides, in the<br />
petroleum ether extract of all three species triterpenes were<br />
detected. Alkaloids were absent in the extracts of investigated<br />
bryophyte species.<br />
Ključne reči:<br />
hemija briofita,<br />
mahovine,<br />
jetrenjače,<br />
fenolne kiseline,<br />
flavonoidi,<br />
triterpeni,<br />
alkaloidi<br />
Sinopsis<br />
PRILOG POZNAVANJU HEMIJSKOG SASTAVA<br />
BALKANSKIH BRIOFITA: FENOLNE KISELINE,<br />
FLAVONOIDI, TRITERPENI I ALKALOIDI<br />
U ovom radu su dati preliminarni rezultati hemijskih<br />
konstituenata tri vrste briofita. Gametofiti Polytrichum<br />
formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mahovine) i Pellia endiviifolia<br />
(jetrenjača) su sakupljeni u prirodnim staništima okoline<br />
Valjeva (Zap. Srbija). Primenjena je TLC tehnika (tankoslojna<br />
hromatografija) u karakterisanju petroleimskog i metanolnog<br />
ekstrakta tri odabrane vrste.<br />
Prisustvo flavonoida (aglikona i glikozida) je potvrdjeno<br />
u svim analiziranim ekstraktima. U ekstraktima dve vrste<br />
detektovane su fenolne kiseline. Osim toga u petroleumskom<br />
ekstraktu sve tri vrste detektovani su triterpeni. Alkaloidi nisi<br />
pronadjeni kod ni jedne od tri istraživane vrste.
124<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Chemical studies of the bryophytes were neglected for a long time. They have<br />
now been shown to be a storehouse of naturally occurring materials, including some<br />
with novel chemical structures. Many of these materials display considerable<br />
biological activity. Investigations are hampered frequently by too small amounts of<br />
plant material. The resulting low yields of components are then generally inadequate<br />
to permit testing for biological activity. In vitro culture and appropriate chemical<br />
synthesis on a preparative scale are being undertaken to overcome this difficulty.<br />
However, bryophytes are the second biggest group of land plants after flowering<br />
plants and a source of chemically new and unknown compounds (e.g. A s a k a w a ,<br />
1994, 2001; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2001; Z i n s m e i s t e r & al., 2003.). Studies of<br />
chemical constituents of bryophytes are recently being performed, but still inadequate<br />
and neglected (A s a k a w a , 1995; T o y o t a & al., 1998; E d e l m a n n & al., 1998;<br />
S p e i c h e r & al., 2000, 2001; K l i n k & al., 2002; P o pper & Fry, 2003;<br />
H e r t e w i c h & al., 2003). These data help in systematic of hardly morphologically<br />
classified bryophytes (e.g. A s a k a w a , 2004). The data on biological activities of<br />
bryophyte extracts and/or chemical constituents are even hard to find (e.g. B a s i l e &<br />
al., 1998a, b, 1999; D u l g e r & al., 2005; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2006,<br />
Sabovljević & Sabovljević , 2007)<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Three selected bryophyte species were used for phytochemical screening using<br />
TLC technique in order to show the presence of phenolic components, triterpenes and<br />
alkaloids in the their extracts. One liverwort and two mosses, Pellia endiviifolia<br />
(Dicks.) Dumort. (talous liverwort), Eurhynchium hians (Hedw.) Sande Lac.<br />
(pleurocarpous moss) and Polytrichum formosum Hedw. (acrocarpous moss) were<br />
analysed. Only the gametophytes were used for the chemical analyses. The<br />
specimens were collected in the native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia) in<br />
August 2002, dried at the room temperature and stored in paper bags at 4°C till the<br />
beginning of the experiments.<br />
Preparation of extracts<br />
3.0 g of ground material was extracted by maceration with 30 ml of petroleum<br />
ether during 48h at room temperature, the extract was filtered and taken into dryness<br />
under reduced pressure. The dry residue was dissolved in 0.2 ml of petroleum ether.<br />
The same material used in previous step was left to dry, and extracted afterward with<br />
30 ml of methanol at the sonic bath during 30 minutes. The extract was filtered, the<br />
filtrate concentrated under reduced pressure and residue taken up in 0.2 ml of<br />
methanol.
125<br />
Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />
Thin layer chromatography<br />
Thin layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 F 254 plates (DC<br />
Alufolien, Merck, Germany). The mobile phases used were: toluene-ethyl acetate<br />
(70:30, v/v) for flavonoid aglycones and triterpenes, ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial<br />
acetic acid-water (100:11:11:26, v/v/v/v) for phenolic acids and flavonoid glycosides<br />
and toluene-ethyl acetate-diethylamine (70:20:10, v/v/v) for alkaloids.<br />
Chromatograms were evaluated under UV light at 254 and 365 nm before and<br />
after spraying with NP-reagent for flavonoids, after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric<br />
acid reagent (VS) for triterpenes and Dragendorff reagent for alkaloids (W a g n e r &<br />
B l a d t , 1996).<br />
RESULTS<br />
The lipophilic compounds of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and<br />
Polytrichum formosum were isolated by petroleum ether and analysed by TLC in<br />
toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v). The chromatogram of petroleum ether extract of<br />
Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum showed the<br />
presence of several zones that correspond to flavonoid aglycones. They were<br />
detected by quenching fluorescence under UV-245 nm and by yellow fluorescence<br />
under UV light at 365 nm before and after spraying with NP-reagent.<br />
Comparing the positions of the zones of yellow fluorescence of all three<br />
bryophyte species on the chromatogram, it may be concluded that they contain some<br />
substances in common, having at least one substance present in all three petroleum<br />
ether extracts (Fig. 1)<br />
After developing the chromatogram in the mobile phase toluene-ethyl acetate<br />
(70:30, v/v), and spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid reagent triterpenes were shown<br />
as bluish-violet zones in the petroleum ether extracts of the examined bryophyte<br />
species (Fig. 2).<br />
The zones in extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum that are<br />
the closest to the start line might derive of the same compound. Similarly, the zones in<br />
Eurhynchium hians and Polytrichum formosum that are the closest to the solvent front<br />
are likely to represent the same substance. Regarding the zones at the half of the<br />
chromatogram, it may be concluded that petroleum ether extracts of all three<br />
bryophytes have one compound in common from triterpene group (Fig. 2).<br />
Methanolic extracts of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum<br />
formosum were analysed by TLC in ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial acetic acid-water<br />
(100:11:11:26, v/v/ v/v) as developing solvent. Flavonoid glycosides were detected in<br />
the chromatogram of methanol extracts of all three species as yellow fluorescing<br />
zones (UV-365 nm) before and after spraying with NP reagent. Chromatogram of<br />
methanol extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum, near the solvent<br />
front showed the presence of blue fluorescing zones in UV light at 365 nm which<br />
correspond to the phenolic acids.
126<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Figure 1. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />
extracts of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />
endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />
obtained in toluene-ethylacetate (70:30, v/v),<br />
after spraying with NP reagent, under UV light<br />
at 365 nm.<br />
Figure 2. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />
extract of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />
endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />
obtained in toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v),<br />
after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid<br />
reagent.
127<br />
Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />
In order to screen methanolic extracts of analysed bryophyte species for<br />
presence of alkaloids, the chromatograms were developed in toluene-ethyl acetatediethylamine<br />
(70:20:10, v/v/v), and sprayed with Dragendorff reagent. Under given<br />
conditions of analysis, no orange-brown or brownish zones that correspond to alkaloid<br />
compounds could be noticed.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
The study gives first insight into chemistry of bryophytes from the Balkan<br />
Peninsula. The compounds detected are already known among bryophytes. Generally,<br />
liverworts are more often used for chemical studies due to their oil bodies and so<br />
other species of Pellia was subject of chemical content studies. However, it remains<br />
unknown to the authors whether there have been previously chemical analyses of<br />
selected moss species for this study at all.<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
Many thanks to Dr. Rayna Natcheva (Sofia) for valuable comments to manuscript.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
ASAKAWA, Y. (1994): Highlights in Phytochemistry of Hepaticae - Biologically<br />
Active Terpenoids and Aromatic Compounds. - Pure and Applied Chemistry,<br />
66(10/11): 2193-2196.<br />
ASAKAWA Y. (1995): Chemical Constituents of the Bryophytes. In: Herz W., Kirby<br />
G. W., Moore R. W., Steglich W. and Tamm Ch. (Eds.), Progress in the<br />
Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, Vol 65. Springer Verlag, Wien, New<br />
York.<br />
ASAKAWA, Y. (2001): Recent Advances in Phytochemistry of Bryophytesacetogenins,Terpenoids<br />
and Bis(bibenzyl)s from Selected Japanese, Taiwanese,<br />
New Zealand, Argentinean and European Lliverworts. - Phytochemistry 56: 297-<br />
312.<br />
ASAKAWA, Y. (2004): Chemosystematics of the Hepaticae. Phytochemistry, 65:<br />
623-669.<br />
BASILE, A., SORBO, S., GIORDANO, S., LAVITOLA, A. & CASTALDO-<br />
C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998a): Antibacterial Activity in Pleurochaete squarrosa<br />
extract. - International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 10: 169-172.
128<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., SORBO, S., VUOTTO, M. L., IELPO, M. T. L.<br />
& C A S T A L D O - C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998b): Antibiotic Effects of Lunularia<br />
cruciata (Bryophyta) Extract. - Pharmaceutical Biology, 36 (1): 25-28.<br />
BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., LÓPEZ-SÁEZ, J. A., CASTALDO-<br />
C O B I A N C H I , R. (1999): Antibacterial Activity of Pure Flavonoids Isolated<br />
from Mosses. - Phytochemistry, 52: 1479-1482.<br />
DULGER, B., TONGUÇ-YAYINTAS, Ö. & GONUZ, A. 2005. Antimicrobial<br />
Activities of some Mosses from Turkey. - Fitoterapia, 76: 730-732.<br />
E D E L M A N N , H., N E I N H U I S , C., J A R V I S , M. C., E V A N S , B., F I S C H E R ,<br />
E. & B A R T H L O T T , W. (1998): Ultrastructure and Chemistry of the Cell Wall<br />
of the Moss Rhacocarpus purpurascens (Rhacocarpaceae): a Puzzling<br />
Architecture among Plants. - Planta, 206: 315-321.<br />
HERTEWICH U.M., ZAPP J. & BECKER H. (2003): Secondary Metabolites<br />
from the Liverwort Jamesoniella colorata. - Phytochemistry, 63 (2): 227-233.<br />
KLINK, J.W.VAN, ZAPP, J. & BECKER, H. (2002): Pinguisane-type<br />
Sesquiterpenes from the South American Liverwort Porella recurva (Taylor)<br />
Kuhnemann. - Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 57: 413-417.<br />
POPPER, Z. A. & FRY, S.C. (2003): Primary Cell Wall Composition of Bryophytes<br />
and Charophytes. - Annals of Botany, 91: 1-12.<br />
SABOVLJEVIĆ , M., BIJELOVIĆ , A. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D. (2001): Bryophytes as<br />
a Potential Source of Medicinal Compounds. - Lekovite Sirovine, 21: 17 – 29.<br />
SABOVLJEVIĆ , A., S O K O V I Ć , M., SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D.<br />
(2006): Antimicrobial Activity of Bryum argenteum. – Fitoterapia, 77: 144-145.<br />
SABOVLJEVIĆ , A. & SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. (2007): Bryophytes, a Source of Bioactive<br />
and New Compounds. – In: G o v i l , J. N. (ed.). Phytopharmacology and Therapeutic<br />
Values IV, the Series "Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants". Pp. 9-25.<br />
SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & H E I N Z L E , E. (2000): Rapid Detection<br />
of Multiple Chlorinated Bis(bibenzyls) in Bryophyte Crude Extracts Using Laser<br />
Desorption/ionization time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry. - Rapid Communications<br />
in Mass Spectrometry, 15 (2): 124 – 127.<br />
SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & HEINZLE, E. (2001): Rapid Detection<br />
of Chlorinated Bisbenzyls in Bazzania trilobata Using MALDI-TOF Mass<br />
Spectrometry. – Phytochemistry, 57: 303-306.<br />
TOYOTA, M., MASUDA, K. & ASAKAWA, Y. (1998): Triterpenoid Constituents<br />
of the Moss Floribundaria aurea subsp. nipponica. - Phytochemistry, 48 (2): 297-<br />
299.<br />
W A G N E R , H. & B L A D T , S. (1996): Plant Drug Analysis, A Thin Layer<br />
Chromatography Atlas. Springer-Verlag Berlin.
129<br />
Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />
Z I N S M E I S T E R , H. D., B E C K E R , H. & E I C H E R , T. (2003): Bryophytes, a<br />
Source of Biologically Active, Naturally Occurring Material. - Angewandte<br />
Chemie, 30(2): 130-147.<br />
Received: 07.05.2007.
130<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:131-136<br />
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE<br />
OTHER METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />
Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />
1<br />
University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />
Montenegro<br />
Key words:<br />
PCR,<br />
Chlamydia<br />
trachomatis<br />
Klučne riječi:<br />
PCR,<br />
Chlamydia<br />
trachomatis<br />
Synopsis<br />
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods are the<br />
most advanced methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.<br />
There are various tests for detection of C. trachomatis. Many<br />
people, including specialists, do not know about reliability of tests<br />
and a comparative survey is welcome for overcoming this problem.<br />
Lack of sensitivity, specificity, or both, sensitivity and specificity, and<br />
some other disadvantages are common problems of those tests.<br />
However, polymerase chain reaction based methods do not have<br />
any of those common problems. They are the best methods for<br />
detection of C. trachomatis, which provide the most reliable results.<br />
Samples can be processed in just 5-6 hours. Disadvantage of PCR<br />
based methods is high price and high technology which makes them<br />
unavailable especially for people in developing countries.<br />
Sinopsis<br />
PCR (REAKCIJA POLIMERIZACIJE LANCA) U DETEKCIJI<br />
Chlamydia trachomatis I DRUGE METODE – UPOREDNA<br />
ISTRAŽIVANJA<br />
Metode bazirane na reakciji polimerizacije lanca (PCR) su<br />
najsavremenije metode za detekciju Chlamydia trachomatis. Postoje<br />
različiti testovi za detekciju C. trachomatis. Mnogi ljudi, uključujući<br />
specijaliste, nisu upoznati sa pouzdanošću testova, pa je jedan<br />
uporedni pregled važan za prevazilaženje ovog problema.<br />
Nedostatak osetljivosti, specifičnosti, ili oboje, osetljivosti i<br />
specifičnosti, i neke druge mane su česti problemi vezani za ove<br />
testove. Ipak, ni jedan od tih problema nije prisutan kod metoda<br />
baziranih na reakciji polimerizacije lanca. To su najbolje metode za<br />
detekciju C. trachomatis, koje daju najpouzdanije rezultate. Uzorci<br />
mogu biti obrađeni za samo 5-6 časova. Mana metoda baziranih na<br />
PCR-u je visoka cijena i visoka tehnologija koje su uzrok<br />
nedostupnosti metode, naročito za ljude u zemljama u razvoju.
132<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Diseases caused by bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis are pretty common<br />
worldwide. Actually, it is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases. In<br />
2005, according to statistics, 976,445 C. trachomatis diagnoses were reported (up<br />
from 929,462 in 2004) in the USA. However, most of C. trachomatis cases remain<br />
undiagnosed and it is estimated that there are 2.8 million new cases annually<br />
(Weinstock et al., 2004). Direct and indirect costs of cure of the disease exceed 2.4<br />
billion US dollars annually (Washington and Katz, 2000). Increase in cases is probably<br />
partially caused by advance in diagnostic laboratory tests. C. trachomatis is an<br />
intracellular bacterium and cannot be grown on agar plates. The infectious,<br />
extracellular form is an elementary body, typically 0.2-0.6 μm in diameter. Elementary<br />
bodies that have been endocytosed by eukaryotic cells typically remain in vacuolar<br />
inclusions and transform into reticulate bodies. Reticulate bodies range up to 1.5 μm.<br />
If untreated, chlamydial infections can progress to serious reproductive and other<br />
health problems with both short-term and long-term consequences. One of the main<br />
reasons that this disease is very common is the fact that it is mostly asymptomatic<br />
(Stamm, 1999). An asymptomatic disease can be diagnosed only by laboratory tests<br />
because of lack of symptoms. This is the reason that efficient cure and eradication of<br />
the disease is possible only if laboratory tests are highly reliable.<br />
A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF METHODS<br />
There are several basic methods in laboratory detection of C. trachomatis.<br />
They have various specificities, and all of them (except PCR) have low sensitivity or<br />
cannot be efficiently applied for large scale analyses. In the case of asymptomatic<br />
diseases, which can be diagnosed only with a laboratory test, low sensitivity of the<br />
test is unacceptable. A survey of sensitivity of basic methods for detection of C.<br />
trachomatis is given in table 1 (Ossewaarde, 1995).<br />
DIAGNOSTIC METHOD<br />
SENSITIVITY (PERCENT)<br />
PCR 90-100%<br />
Cell Culture (McCoy) 60-80%<br />
Fluorescent Microscopy with Fluorescent 55-75%<br />
Antibodies<br />
ELISA 50-70%<br />
Hybridization with DNK Probes 50-70%<br />
Fast Tests 40-60%<br />
Table 1. Basic methods used in laboratory diagnostics of C. Trachomatis<br />
and their diagnostic sensitivity.
133<br />
Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />
Cell culture. Analysis in cell culture of McCoy cell line is one of methods for<br />
detection of C. trachomatis (Black, 1997). Its sensitivity is 60-80% and it takes 4-7<br />
days. Disadvantage of this method is that is not suitable for large scale application.<br />
Maintenance of cell culture is expensive and labor and time consuming. Sterile<br />
conditions are essential for cell culture and contamination is a very common problem<br />
especially in case of processing of many samples. Thus cell culture is not suitable for<br />
routine laboratory diagnostics. Actually, the relatively low sensitivity, long turnaround<br />
time, difficulties in standardization, labor intensity, technical complexity, stringent<br />
transport requirements, and relatively high cost are the primary disadvantages of cell<br />
culture isolation of C. trachomatis. This is the reason that this method has not been<br />
applied in large scale diagnostics.<br />
Fluorescent microscopy. Fluorescent microscopy can be with monoclonal and<br />
polyclonal antibodies. Sensitivity and specificity are 55-75% and 85-95% respectively.<br />
People who do analysis have to be well trained and the accuracy of results largely<br />
depends of their experience. If little amount of bacteria and large amount of cells and<br />
cell debris is present in the sample, result cannot be clear and depends of subjective<br />
opinion of person who does the test. This is the reason that this method largely<br />
depends of experience and degree of training, and sensitivity and specificity can be<br />
even lower in case of bad specialist. Actually, well trained specialists and with good<br />
experience are rare. Another disadvantage of this method is possibility of reaction of<br />
applied antibodies with antigens of other species of genus Chlamydia, which would<br />
lead to false positive results. Antibodies available on the market sometimes can react<br />
even with species that do not belong to genus Chlamydia. Monoclonal antibodies are<br />
expensive and polyclonal give worse results.<br />
ELISA. ELISA is another method applied in diagnostics of C. trachomatis. Its<br />
sensitivity is 50-70%. It is often applied in detection of specific antibodies in patients’<br />
blood that are synthesized under influence of C. trachomatis. In primary immune<br />
response first are synthesized antibodies of class IgM, and later IgG and IgA are the<br />
last. In secondary immune response just IgG and IgA are present, and IgM is absent.<br />
Because presence of various antibodies during the infection vary, it is necessary to<br />
perform test with at least 2 classes of antibodies, which additionally increase<br />
expenses. Immunity of a patient can be decreased for various reasons (the other<br />
disease, stress, treatment with immunosuppressors in case of patients with<br />
transplanted organ etc.), which can decrease concentration of antibodies below the<br />
sensitivity threshold of the method and increase amount of false negative results.<br />
Besides, antibodies begin to be synthesized always after an infection, and only after a<br />
given time amount of antibodies is increased above sensitivity threshold of the<br />
method. If concentration of antibodies is below the threshold, diagnostics is not<br />
possible. Very serious problem of this method is the fact that antibodies are present in<br />
the body of healthy patients after a treatment. This test, in this case, would be positive<br />
in spite of the fact that patient is healthy. This is a problem of all indirect methods that
134<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
detect presence of specific antibodies instead of causative agent of the disease.<br />
There is ELISA that detects antigens. These antigens are extracted by bacteria into<br />
the environment which can increase possibility to detect them because permanent<br />
extraction increases their concentration in the environment. In this case the method<br />
does not detect bacteria, but antigens that are extracted into environment. ELISA has<br />
the same problems with false positive reactions with bacteria of other species and<br />
genera as fluorescent antibodies methods, because it is based on antibodies, too.<br />
This method should not be used for detection of rectal samples because of increased<br />
reaction with fecal bacteria that can give more false positive results. Reaction of<br />
ELISA antibodies with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae is often reason of<br />
false positive results (Demaio et al., 1991; Anderson et al., 1993). Some ELISA tests<br />
(which detect presence of lipopolysaccharides of Chlamydia) do not distinguish<br />
species of genus Chlamydia, and positive result does not mean always that detected<br />
bacterium is C. trachomatis. Good characteristics of ELISA tests are high degree of<br />
automation, which made possible employment of low qualified personal, and low cost<br />
of the test. Bad characteristics are low reliability because of low sensitivity and<br />
possible false positive results.<br />
Hybridization with DNA probes. Hybridization with DNA probes is a molecular<br />
biology test. This kind of test is complicated, time and labor consuming, and<br />
expensive. Its sensitivity is just (50-70%) which is substantially less than sensitivity of<br />
the other kind of molecular test (PCR).<br />
Fast tests. This kind of tests is possible to bye in drug stores and patients can<br />
apply it by themselves following directions submitted with the test. Results can be<br />
obtained in 10-15 minutes. They can be based on immunochromatographic or specific<br />
enzyme reaction. They have a low sensitivity (40-60%) and specificity (Suchland et<br />
al., 1997). This kind of tests has just 1 good characteristic which is expressed in their<br />
name – they are fast and simple for application. Thus, they can be applied just for<br />
very rough screening.<br />
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tests. PCR has been discovered by<br />
American scientist Kary Mullis in 1984, and shortly, it became a widely applied method<br />
in scientific research, and as well as in various applications (diagnostic of infectious<br />
and genetic diseases, forensic etc.). Kary Mullis became Nobel Prize winner in 1993<br />
for polymerase chain reaction. PCR based methods are the most advanced tools for<br />
diagnostic of C. trachomatis. It has a number of advantages in comparison to the<br />
other methods.<br />
• High sensitivity is one of the most important characteristics of PCR. PCR is<br />
based on replication (amplification) in vitro of a DNA sequence that is highly<br />
specific for infectious agent. A sequence that is present in a few or even just one<br />
copy can be copied (replicated) to produce a huge amount (thousands of billions
135<br />
Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />
copies or even more). Such large amount of DNA molecules can be detected<br />
easily, and this is the main reason that PCR is more sensitive than the other<br />
methods. Analytical sensitivity of PCR is in most cases 1-10 elementary bodies<br />
of C. trachomatis. Sensitivity of fluorescent antibodies microscopy is 10-500<br />
elementary bodies, and ELISA 5000-100 000 elementary bodies (Black, 1997).<br />
Diagnostic sensitivity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is 90-100%.<br />
• PCR based methods are direct methods. They directly detect presence of the<br />
bacterium. Many other methods detect specific antibodies, or a product of the<br />
bacterium which is extracted into the environment. PCR based methods detects<br />
a specific DNA which is present in the bacterium.<br />
• High specificity of PCR based methods is possible because they amplify and<br />
detect a sequence highly specific for the bacterium. The sequence can be highly<br />
conservative that makes possible detection of causative agents with high<br />
antigenic changeability. Specificity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is<br />
99.6% (Black, 1997).<br />
• PCR methods can process samples in just 5-6 hours and provide highly reliable<br />
results.<br />
• Samples for PCR based methods can be processed from all sources including<br />
noninvasive ones, as urine.<br />
Disadvantages of PCR based methods are high price and complicated<br />
processing of the samples. This makes them unsuitable for large scale screenings.<br />
However, high reliability and other advantages are good compensation for mentioned<br />
disadvantages.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Polymerase chain reaction based methods are the most reliable methods for<br />
detection of C. trachomatis infections. Very important characteristics of a laboratory<br />
diagnostics method are sensitivity and specificity. PCR based methods are the most<br />
superior in this sense. They are direct methods based on detection of a DNA<br />
sequence specific for C. trachomatis, which insure that positive result means<br />
presence of the bacterium. These methods make possible processing of samples in<br />
one working day and they can be obtained from all sources including noninvasive,<br />
which make them very suitable for eradication of the disease. In contrast, low<br />
sensitivity of the other methods makes them unsuitable for reliable diagnostics.<br />
However, high expenses and application of high technology makes PCR based<br />
methods less accessible to patients.
136<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
REFERENCES<br />
A N D E R S O N , J. R., M U M T A Z , G., M U L H A R E , P., P O D D A R , J. and<br />
R I D G W A Y G. L. 1993: Mandatory Use of Confirmation Stage with<br />
Chlamydiazyme During Urinary Sediment Analysis. - J Clin Pathol 46: 896-897.<br />
B L A C K , C.M. 1997: Current Methods of Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia<br />
trachomatis Infections. - Clinical Microbiology Reviews 10: 160–184<br />
D E M A I O , J., B O Y D , R.S., R E N S I , R. and C L A R K , A. 1991: False-positive<br />
Chlamydiazyme Results During Urine Sediment Analysis due to Bacterial<br />
Urinary Tract Infections. - J Clin Microbiol 29: 1436-8.<br />
O S S E W A A R D E , J. M. 1995: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology<br />
and Venerology 5: 111-123.<br />
S T A M M , W.E. 1999: Chlamydia trachomatis Infections of the Adult. In: Holmes KK,<br />
Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3 rd ed. New<br />
York, NY: McGraw-Hill,: 407-22.<br />
SUCHLAND, K.L., COUNTS, J.M. and S T A M M , W.E. (1997): Laboratory<br />
Methods for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: Survey of Laboratories in<br />
Washington State. - J Clin Microbiol 35: 3210-4.<br />
W A S H I N G T O N , A.E. and K A T Z , P. 1991: Cost of and Payment Source for Pelvic<br />
Inflammatory Disease. Trends and Projections, 1983 through 2000. - JAMA 266:<br />
2565-9.<br />
W E I N S T O C K , H., B E R M A N , S. and C A T E S , W. Jr. 2004: Sexually<br />
Transmitted Diseases among American Youth: Incidence and Prevalence<br />
Estimates, 2000. - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36: 6-10.<br />
Received: 27.04.2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:137-149<br />
INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />
1<br />
University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />
Montenegro<br />
Key words:<br />
transgenic plants,<br />
commercial use<br />
Klučne riječi:<br />
transgene biljke,<br />
komercijalna<br />
primena<br />
Synopsis<br />
In 1983, transgenic plants were introduced by four groups<br />
of authors. However, commercial use of transgenic plants dates<br />
from 1996. Since its first application, cultivation area of<br />
transgenic crops around the world has been permanently<br />
increasing. Transferring of a transgene from microorganisms,<br />
animals, and distant plants, transgenic plants can obtain novel<br />
treats that would probably never be introduced by conventional<br />
breeding. New treats that plants can get in nature by<br />
spontaneous mutations and breeding occur slowly. During the<br />
evolution organisms have been accommodated to changes in<br />
their environment, in contrast to revolutionary changes<br />
introduced by molecular biology methods applied on production<br />
of transgenic crops. This can make disbalance among organisms<br />
and cause some ecological problems. Such problems can be<br />
solved by regulations which forbid use of transgenic crops<br />
without vigorous assays for safe application.<br />
Sinopsis<br />
UTICAJ TRANSGENIH BILJAKA NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU<br />
Četiri grupe autora su 1983. godine po prvi put dobile transgene<br />
biljke. Ipak, komercijalna primena transgenih biljaka datira od 1996.<br />
godine. Od svoje prve primene, obradiva površina pod transgenim<br />
kulturama širom sveta je u stalnom porastu. Transferom nekog gena iz<br />
mikroorganizama, životinja i nesrodnih biljaka, transgene biljke mogu<br />
dobiti nove osobine koje verovatno ne bi nikada dobile konvencionalnim<br />
ukrštanjem. Nova svojstva koja biljke mogu dobiti u prirodi spontanim<br />
mutacijama i ukrštanjem događaju se sporo. U toku evolucije organizmi<br />
su se prilagođavali na promene u njihovoj okolini za razliku od<br />
revolucionarnih promena koje su uvele metode molekularne biologije<br />
primenjene u proizvodnji transgenih kultura. Ovo može dovesti do<br />
disbalansa među organizmima i uzrokovati neke ekološke probleme.<br />
Takvi problemi mogu biti rešeni propisima koji zabranjuju primenu<br />
transgenih biljaka bez prethodne temeljne provere bezbednosti primene.
138<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Plant breeding has been a basic method for obtaining plants of particular traits<br />
for several thousand years. People have used this method to improve some<br />
characteristics of plants (sweeter and larger fruits, aridity and disease resistance,<br />
faster growth) in spite of the fact that they did not understand breeding process and<br />
its background. In 1865, Gregor Mendel showed that the inheritance of traits follows<br />
particular regularities, but the significance of Mendel's work was not recognized until<br />
1900. Traditional plant breeding is very difficult and time and labor consuming<br />
process. By artificial plant crossing, plant breeders try to obtain plants of desirable<br />
traits. To achieve this goal, they have to travel all around the world to find plants of<br />
particular traits that are suitable for breeding. Variations of treats among plants arise<br />
as result of mutations. However, these mutations, and as well as variations, are of<br />
limited number. In 1926, Hermann Joseph Muller found that X-rays irradiation can<br />
induce mutations (in 1946 he was awarded Nobel Prize for this discovery) (M u l l e r ,<br />
1926). After this discovery, it was found out that irradiation of seed can greatly<br />
increase amount of mutations in next generation. Since the end of World War II,<br />
induced mutation have been widely applied in plant breeding. Such method was<br />
named mutation breeding. Mutations, and thus, variations of traits, can be induced<br />
with ionizing radiation (X-rays, gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons,<br />
protons) or chemical agents (sodium azide, ethyl methanesulphonate). This is a way<br />
to increase variability and to get plants of desirable traits that are not available in<br />
nature. This method is named mutation breading. It became popular after World War<br />
II, and it is popular at the present time as well.<br />
Classical plant breeding uses deliberate interbreeding of closely or distantly<br />
related species to produce new crops with desirable properties. Breeding is possible<br />
between plants within the same species, genus and, less commonly, between plants<br />
of different genera. Plants that are evolutionally distant have larger amount of different<br />
properties. Thus, amount of plant property variations that are available for breeding<br />
and obtaining of new crops is limited, because breeding between plants that are<br />
evolutionally distant is not possible. Even application of mutation breading produces<br />
new crops with limited variations in treats. Additionally, induced mutations which are<br />
obtained by mutation breeding produce new treats that cannot be predicted, because<br />
mutations are random events. All these features of classical and mutation breeding<br />
limit their application.<br />
In 1983, four groups of authors, almost simultaneously, introduced a novel<br />
method for production of new crops. They worked independently, and three of them<br />
announced their work at a conference in Miami, USA in January 1983 (Framond et al.,<br />
1983; Schell et al., 1983; Fraley et al., 1983). Their researches enable gene transfer<br />
from bacteria into plants. These works were published in scientific journals as well<br />
(B e v a n , et al. 1983; H e r r e r a - E s t r e l l a et al., 1983; F r a l e y et al., 1983). The<br />
fourth had transferred a plant gene from one species into another species. They<br />
announced their research at a conference in Los Angeles, USA, in April 1983, and
139<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
later it was published in a journal (M u r a i et al., 1983). Plants obtained this way are<br />
transgenic plants. This method enables gene insertion of one or more genes from a<br />
plant which can be evolutionally very distant into another plant. The genes can be<br />
transferred from any organism (animals, bacteria, viruses etc.) into a plant. This<br />
makes possible production of novel crops with new treats which in practice can never<br />
be obtained by breeding. Very important feature of this method is possibility to predict<br />
novel treats of transgenic crops. It enables to skip millions of years of evolution that<br />
would be necessary for nature to produce plants with so different treats. This skip<br />
made impossible accommodation between transgenic crops and environment, and<br />
develops concerns regarding the application of transgenic plants. However, transgenic<br />
plants can provide substantial benefits: better nutritional characteristics, increased<br />
productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, pest and disease resistance,<br />
etc.<br />
Production Process of Transgenic Plants<br />
Molecular biology methods enable gene transfer and production of transgenic<br />
plants. These methods are commonly named genetic engineering. Actually, all<br />
molecular biology methods that can be involved as tools for changing of genetic<br />
constitution are named genetic engineering. Production of transgenic plants consists<br />
of: isolation of a gene from donor organism, insertion of the gene into plant cell,<br />
obtaining of whole plants from transformed cells grown in tissue culture, plant<br />
breeding and testing.<br />
Isolation of a Gene from a Donor Organism. This is the most difficult step in<br />
production of transgenic plants. This step is mostly based on fundamental research in<br />
determination of structure and function of donor organism genes. It is very important<br />
to locate and determine the role of a gene, its function and treats that the gene is<br />
responsible for. Identification of expression mechanisms of the gene and its influence<br />
on other genes, metabolic pathways of gene products is very important. Procedure of<br />
this step depends very much on results of such researches. In contrast to this step, all<br />
other steps are processed under well determined procedures. Isolated gene that is to<br />
be inserted into a plant is termed transgene.<br />
Insertion of the Gene into Plant Cells. Currently, there are two types of<br />
vehicles which can be used for gene insertion into plants. The most often used vehicle<br />
is Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Figure 1). A. tumefaciens is a gram negative, rod<br />
shaped, bacteria, which is the causal agent of Crown Gall disease (the formation of<br />
tumors) of dicots. It has been used as gene transfer vehicle into dicots, and just<br />
recently into monocots. A. tumefaciens contains chromosomal DNA and plasmid<br />
(known as the Ti-plasmid for tumor-inducing plasmid). In order to be virulent the<br />
bacterial Ti-plasmid has to contain a small segment of DNA termed T-DNA<br />
(transferred DNA), and vir (virulence) genes that direct the infection process. A.
140<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
tumefaciens are attracted to wound sites of a plant by chemotaxis. This is a response<br />
to the release of some common root components (sugars and particularly phenolic<br />
compounds such as acetosyringone). Acetosyringone activates vir genes on the Tiplasmid.<br />
Activity of this gene leads to the production of opine permease, that is<br />
inserted in the bacterial cell membrane for uptake of compounds (opines) that will be<br />
produced by the tumors, and production of an enzyme restriction endonuclease that<br />
excises part of the Ti-plasmid termed the T-DNA. Excised T-DNA released by the<br />
bacterium enters the plant cells and in an unknown way integrates into the<br />
chromosome. T-DNA dictates change in the functioning of those cells which cause<br />
formation of tumors.<br />
Figure 1. Simplified organization of a sequence constructed for insertion into a plant genome.<br />
Insertion of a transgene into plant cell genome does not mean that the gene will<br />
be expressed. Unexpressed gene will not code any product (protein), and thus, will<br />
not provide any new treat to the plant. In order to provide gene expression a promoter<br />
DNA sequence has to be inserted together with the gene, and as well as a termination<br />
sequence (terminator). Terminator signals that gene coding sequences ends, and that<br />
transcription of the DNA has to be ended. A given promoter and terminator can be<br />
combined with various genes (Figure 2). The degree of gene expression, the region of<br />
plant body where the gene will be expressed, and the plant life cycle stage depend on<br />
which promoter is applied.<br />
A marker gene has to be inserted together with the transgene. It is necessary for<br />
selection of cells which received and expressed a transgene. It encodes a protein<br />
which provides resistance to an agent (usually antibiotics or herbicides) which is toxic<br />
to plant cells. Thus, cells that received transgene will be resistant to the toxic agent<br />
(they will survive), and all other cells will die.<br />
Figure 2. Bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
141<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
Ti-plasmid used in gene transfer process is not a wild type plasmid, but plasmid<br />
especially constructed for this purpose. T-DNA sequence which causes tumor growth<br />
is deleted and just its border sequence is retained. A. tumefaciens with such Tiplasmid<br />
is not a pathogen. It retains ability to insert the plasmid into the cell, but the<br />
plasmid cannot cause tumor growth. Transgene is to be inserted into the Ti-plasmid,<br />
instead of removed T-DNA sequence and transferred into a plant cell. The cell is<br />
maintained in tissue culture and transgene is incorporated into the plant chromosome.<br />
The cells in tissue culture are grown in media containing nutrients and hormones<br />
necessary for cell growth.<br />
Obtaining of Whole Plants from Transformed Cells Grown in Tissue<br />
Culture. After the treatment with A. tumefaciens, it is necessary to select transformed<br />
cells. The selection is carried out by replacement of standard media with selectable<br />
media, which contain an agent (usually antibiotic or herbicide) toxic for the cells.<br />
Marker gene inserted into plant chromosome together with the transgene provides<br />
resistance to the toxic agent. Thus, the cells that received marker gene will survive in<br />
the tissue culture, and all other will die. Survived cells will be maintained to produce<br />
an embryo and eventually whole plant.<br />
Plant Breeding and Testing. A limited number of plant lines is possible to use<br />
in effective gene transfer. They are usually not elite lines. To obtain an elite line with a<br />
transgene it is necessary to breed transgenic plant with an elite line. After the<br />
breeding process, a transgenic plant containing at least 98% of elite genes is<br />
produced. The next step is testing of the plant (expression of transgene, stability of<br />
inheritance of the treats, unexpected features of the plant etc.).<br />
Another method for insertion of a transgene is the gene gun. All steps in<br />
production of transgenic plants applying gene gun are pretty much the same as with<br />
A. tumefaciens, except gene insertion. Gene gun method applies microscopic gold<br />
particles to deliver a transgene into the plant cell nucleus. Golden particles coated<br />
with a large amount of transgenes together with a marker gene are accelerated with<br />
air pressure and shoot at tissue culture cells. The golden particles will pass into the<br />
cell nucleus. Coated DNA will be dissolved and inserted into the chromosome. The<br />
method with A. tumefaciens is more effective than gene gun method, but it cannot be<br />
applied to every plant species. A. tumefaciens is ussualy applied with dicots, and<br />
gene gun with monocots.<br />
Transgenic Plants Benefits<br />
New treats introduced by insertion of transgenes into plants can provide a<br />
number of benefits: pest and disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, better nutritional<br />
characteristics, increased productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, etc.
142<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Pest and Disease Resistance. Insertion of a transgene (isolated from a soil<br />
bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis) coding a crystalline (Cry) protein can introduce pest<br />
resistance to transgenic plants. In the intestine gut, the protein is broken down to<br />
release delta-endotoxin that creates pores in the intestinal lining of pets. This creates<br />
ion imbalance, dysfunction of digestive system, and death of the insect in a few days.<br />
Product of Cry gene is considered safe for human and birds, and less harmful for nontarget<br />
insects than other insecticides. Insecticides based on Cry gene have been used<br />
for long time, but in this case they are produced by plant in the plant body. Thus,<br />
insects eating such plant will eventually die. Plants containing this transgene are<br />
named Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) plants. Bt plants available by now are: Bt cotton (to<br />
control European corn borer, Southwestern corn borer, and corn earworm), Bt cotton<br />
(to control cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm), and Bt potato (to control Colorado<br />
potato beetle). Bt plants can decrease application of insecticides, and so, the<br />
surrounding environment is no longer exposed to large amounts of harmful insecticide.<br />
Time and labor saving is achieved too.<br />
Transgenic papaya and squash carrying virus coat protein gene are resistant<br />
to virus. This gene produces virus coat protein before an infection. After the infection,<br />
plant cells will not produce this protein because of co-suppression (plant cell<br />
mechanism which suppresses production of the viral protein), and virus cannot<br />
replicate.<br />
Herbicide Tolerance. Weeds can significantly decrease crop yield, and so<br />
herbicides are widely applied for weed control. Sometimes farmers apply more than<br />
one herbicide because they are specific for a particular weed, and they are applied at<br />
particular growth stage. Herbicides are long lasting and can persist in the soil for<br />
years. Transgenic herbicide tolerant plants have a transgene providing resistance to<br />
new herbicide that can kill all kinds of plants (including weeds). These herbicides<br />
break down in the soil quickly. So far, there are two herbicides that are used with<br />
herbicide tolerant plants: Liberty (glufosinate) and Roundup (glyphosate). These<br />
herbicides break down quickly in contrast to conventional herbicides that can remain<br />
in the soil for more than a year, and thus prevent farmers to plant crops sensitive to<br />
them in future. Fast degradation of these new herbicides protects environment of large<br />
scale contamination, which can be common in the case of conventional herbicides. An<br />
example of transgenic herbicide tolerant plant is Roundup Ready soybean.<br />
Long-Lasting Products. Some plants (strawberries, tomatoes, pineapples,<br />
sweet peppers and bananas) are genetically modified to produce less enzyme that<br />
cause products to rot. These plants can remain firm and fresh for long time. The first<br />
long-lasting plant modified plants was tomato, which came on the market in 1994.<br />
Such tomato can tolerate a longer transport time and it can be allowed to ripen in the<br />
sun before picking - resulting in a better tasting tomato.
143<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
Improvements of nutritious characteristics of the plants. Nutritious<br />
characteristics of a plant can be improved by inserting a transgene. An example is<br />
golden rice. It contains beta-carotene which is converted into vitamin A in the body.<br />
For the golden rice to make beta-carotene three new genes are implanted: two from<br />
daffodils and the third from a bacterium.<br />
Transgenic Plants Risks and Concerns<br />
Transgenic plants can provide many benefits, but in the same time some risks<br />
and concerns. Insertion of transgenes into plants, which introduces novel treats to the<br />
plants, can change interactions among plants and animals. This can cause ecological<br />
and other kinds of problems.<br />
Gene Transfer from Transgenic Crops to Their Wild Relatives. Many crops<br />
have wild relatives which can be crossed by pollination. Thus, there is real danger of<br />
gene transfer from crops to wild population including weeds (K a i s e r , 2001; P o p p y<br />
and W i l k i n s o n , 2005). This possibility is supported by researches. Wild population<br />
would receive novel treats that can make them resistant to many factors. This is<br />
especially critical for weeds. Weeds resistant for herbicides, plant diseases, climatic<br />
factors etc. would be a nightmare for every farmer. Transgene transfer to wild<br />
relatives that are not weeds is not desirable either, because this could change natural<br />
balance in the wild nature and cause ecological problems.<br />
Crop to Crop Gene Flow. Gene transfer is possible from transgenic to<br />
conventional crops (H a l l et al., 2000; R i t a l a e t al., 2002).The transfer is processed<br />
by pollination, and pollen can be carried by wind and insects. After this gene flow,<br />
farmers that plant conventional crops will have transgenic even if they dislike them.<br />
Long-term application of transgenic crops and gene flow can lead even to complete<br />
loss of conventional crops. This is the most likely to occur in the case of highly<br />
outcrossing plants in contrast to highly self-pollinating plants.<br />
Antibiotic resistance. All transgenic crops in the process of their production<br />
have to contain a marker gene which is inserted to insure that a transgene has been<br />
inserted into the plant. It is usually an antibiotic resistance gene. There is a concern<br />
that bacteria, which inhabit intestine of human and animals, could be transformed by<br />
transfer of a DNA fragment carrying the antibiotic resistance gene from the intestine<br />
into the bacterial cell. After such transformation, bacteria would become resistant to a<br />
given antibiotic. This could lead to increase of amount of antibiotic resistant bacterial<br />
strains in the nature, and would cause problems in human and animal medical<br />
treatment. However, application of new markers that do not represent antibiotic<br />
resistance genes would resolve this problem. An example of such markers is green<br />
fluorescent protein and mannose (Joersbo et al., 1998). Another way to resolve this
144<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
problem is to remove the marker after the development of transgenic plant, when its<br />
presence is not required any more (Zuo, 2001). Transgenic plants with green<br />
fluorescent protein as a marker and with removed markers are already submitted for<br />
authorization and their large scale production can be expected soon.<br />
Allergenicity. Insertion of a transgene into a plant can cause production of a<br />
product which is an allergen. This allergen will cause allergic reaction, which can be<br />
fatal to persons who consume such plants and are allergic. Some plants do not<br />
contain any allergen, but insertion of a transgene which produces them can cause<br />
health problem and even death of people who are allergic. Allergic people who do not<br />
know that a transgenic plant contains a given allergen can be in great danger. An<br />
example is transgenic soybean with inserted gene from Brazil nut (Nordlee et al.,<br />
1996). The gene was inserted to improve nutritional characteristics of soybean, but<br />
people who were allergic to Brazil nut were allergic to mentioned transgenic soybean<br />
too. This soybean has never been approved for market application. Now, all<br />
transgenic plants are tested for allergens to solve this problem.<br />
Terminator Technology. In 1990s U.S. Department of Agriculture and Delta<br />
and Pine Land Company developed a method for protection of technology. The goal of<br />
this method is to force farmers to pay intellectual property for development of<br />
transgenic plants. Actually, many farmers all over the world save some seeds to plant<br />
next year. If they buy transgenic seeds from a company developer of the transgenic<br />
plant once, they do not have to buy it anymore because they can produce transgenic<br />
seeds by themselves, saving some of the seeds in next generation. In 1998,<br />
developers of mentioned method were awarded a joint patent. The method is named<br />
Technology Protection System (TPS). TPS makes possible production of seeds which<br />
is sterile in the second generation. Seeds obtained after first generation is good for<br />
consumption, but plant embryo is killed by TPS, making seed unsuitable for planting.<br />
Thus, if farmers want to plant transgenic plants, they have to buy seeds from company<br />
developer of the seed.<br />
Advantage of this technology is that plant pollinated with transgenic plants will<br />
be sterile as well, and it will prevent gene flow from transgenic plant to the other<br />
plants. Another advantage is that this will encourage biotech companies for further<br />
development of transgenic plants with novel treats, especially those that are not so<br />
profitable for them.<br />
Disadvantage is that some farmers, especially small and farmers in developing<br />
countries, will not be able to buy seeds every season. That would increase cost of the<br />
production, and it can lead to their bankruptcy in competition with large<br />
manufacturers. Another disadvantage is that neighboring non-transgenic crops and<br />
wild plants would be affected, because after possible pollination their seeds would be<br />
sterile and it could cause lower yield. This impact would be higher on non-transgenic<br />
crops than on wild plants.
145<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
There is another system for protection of technology named Trait-specific<br />
Genetic Use Restriction Technology or T-Gurt. It was developed by agro-chemical<br />
companies including Monsanto and AstraZeneca. T-Gurt does not cause production of<br />
sterile seeds. The seeds in next generation would not express transgenes. However, if<br />
seeds are sprayed with a chemical, sold solely by the manufacturer of seeds, the<br />
transgene would be expressed.<br />
Benefits of this technology are that transgenes would not be expressed in the<br />
wild plants, and farmers can plant seeds obtained in the next generation (but without<br />
expression of transgenes if they do not buy the chemicals). Disadvantages are that<br />
transgenes would be transferred by pollination to the neighboring population (crops<br />
and wild plants) in spite the fact that it will not be expressed and spraying of the seed<br />
with the chemicals can make negative impact on environment.<br />
A new sophisticated system for protection of technology which produces sterile<br />
seeds is under development. This seed becomes fertile if it is sprayed with a chemical<br />
sold by company developer of the transgenic plant.<br />
None of terminator technologies has been applied yet. A great resistance to its<br />
application given by farmers all around the world is one of the reasons for delaying of<br />
the application. However, it is hard to believe that large agro-chemical companies will<br />
quit these projects which can enable them to make additional large scale profit.<br />
Production of Transgenic Crops around the World<br />
In 1996, the first transgenic crops were planted in the USA for commercial use.<br />
Cultivation of transgenic crops has shown permanent increase (Figure 3) according to<br />
ISAAA (ISAAA, 2006). In 2006, they were grown on 102 million hectares worldwide.<br />
The increase has been observed in both, industrial and developing countries. The<br />
USA is the country with the largest area planted with transgenic crops. European<br />
countries do not plant large areas with transgenic plants, and their amounts are<br />
modest in comparison to some other countries (table 1). In 2006, the most often<br />
planted transgenic crops around the world were: soybean (58.6 million hectares),<br />
maize (25.2 million hectares), cotton (13.4 million hectares), canola (4.8 million<br />
hectares).
146<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
Figure 3. Global area of transgenic plants in<br />
million hectares (1996-2006).<br />
COUNTRY<br />
CULTIVATION<br />
AREAS<br />
TRANSGENIC PLANTS<br />
USA 54,6 S,M,C,R, Squash, Papaya,<br />
Alfalfa<br />
Argentina 18,0 S,M,C<br />
Brazil 11,5 S, C<br />
Canada 6,1 R,M,S<br />
India 3,8 C<br />
China 3,5 C<br />
Paraguay 2,0 S<br />
South Africa 1,4 M,S,C<br />
Uruguay 0,4 S,M<br />
Philippines 0,2 M<br />
Australia 0,2 C<br />
<strong>Rom</strong>ania 0,1 S<br />
Mexico 0,1 C,S<br />
Spain 0,1 M<br />
Colombia
147<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
There are many contradictory opinions in connection with transgenic plants.<br />
Even experts in that field do not have common opinion. Some experts have opinion<br />
that application of transgenic plants can be very dangerous for environment and<br />
human health. The others have opinion that risks are overestimated, and that future is<br />
in transgenic plants. Actually, probably both groups of experts are right. Application of<br />
transgenic plants without appropriate regulations can be very risky. The new<br />
transgenes inserted into them, and novel treats, can disturb harmony among<br />
organisms that has been built by nature for many millions of years. This<br />
disorganization of an ecosystem is not predictable and cannot be always prevented.<br />
Restoring of the consequences could be very difficult and probably in majority of the<br />
cases impossible. Transgenes that are accidentally transferred to the other plants,<br />
including wild environment, will stay there forever. However, application of transgenic<br />
plants can increase agricultural production, decrease cost of products and save<br />
environment by decreasing amount of applied chemicals (or by application of safer<br />
chemicals). Transgenic plant can be resistant to various plant diseases and<br />
environmental conditions which can make them very suitable for agricultural<br />
production. The problems caused by introduction of transgenes cannot be solved by<br />
nature, or to be more accurate, nature would need very long time to do that with<br />
dangerous consequences. Thus, only solution is to prevent all known problems and to<br />
begin with application of transgenic plants with precautions. Regulations, which would<br />
prevent large scale application without preliminary assays and approval, are<br />
necessary at national and as well as international levels.<br />
Contemporary obtained improvements obtained by transgenic technology are<br />
very modest in comparison to benefits that will be in the future. Now, we enjoy y just<br />
novice movements in this field. Benefits in the future will be so huge that agricultural<br />
production without transgenic plants can be compared to transportation with animaldrawn<br />
vehicles.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
BEVAN, M.W., FLAVELL, R.B. and C H I L T O N M.D. 1983: A Chimaeric<br />
Antibiotic Resistance Gene as a Selectable Marker for Plant Cell<br />
Transformation. - Nature 304: 184-187.<br />
F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.B. and H O R S C H . R.B. 1983: Use of a Chimeric<br />
Gene to Confer Antibiotic Resistance to Plant Cells. - Advances in Gene<br />
Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia<br />
Vol. 20: 211-221.<br />
F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.G., H O R S C H , R.B., S A N D E R S , P.R., F L I C K ,<br />
J.S., A D A M S , S.P., B I T T N E R , M.L., B R A N D , L.A., F I N K , C.L., F R Y ,
148<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />
J.S., G A L L U P P I , G.R., G O L D B E R G , S.B. H O F F M A N N , N.L. and<br />
W O O , S.C. 1983: Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells. - Proceedings<br />
of the National Academy of Sciences 80: 4803-4807.<br />
FRAMOND, A.J., BEVAN, M.W., BARTON, K.A., FLAVELL, F. and<br />
C H I L T O N , M.D. 1983: Mini-Ti Plasmid and a Chimeric Gene Construct: New<br />
Approaches to Plant Gene Vector Construction. - Advances in Gene Technology:<br />
Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia Vol 20: 159-<br />
170.<br />
H A L L , L., T O P I N K A , K., H U F F M A N , J., and D A V I S , L. 2000: Pollen Flow<br />
between Herbicide-resistant Brassica napus Is the Cause of Multiple-resistant B.<br />
napus Volunteers. - Weed Science 48: 688-694.<br />
HERRERA-ESTRELLA, L., DEPICKER, A., Van MONTAGU, M. and<br />
S C H E L L , J. 1983. Expression of Chimaeric Genes Transfered into Plant Cells<br />
Using a Ti-plasmid-derived Vector. - Nature 303: 209-213.<br />
ISAAA (The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)<br />
Briefs (2006) 35.<br />
JOERSBO, M., DONALDSON, I., KREIBERG, J., PETERSEN, S.G.,<br />
B R U N S T E D T , J. and O K K E L S , F.T. (1998): Analysis of Mannose<br />
Selection Used for Transformation of Sugar Beet. Molecular Breeding 4: 111-<br />
117.<br />
K A I S E R , J. 2001: Breeding a Hardier Weed. - Science 293: 1425-1426.<br />
M U L L E R , H.J. 1926: The Problem of Genetic Modification. Fifth International<br />
Congress of Genetics. Berlin.<br />
M U R A I , N., S U T T O N , D.W., M U R R A Y , M.G., S L I G H T O M , J.L., M E R L O ,<br />
D.J., REICHERT, N.A., SENGUPTA-GOPALAN, C., STOCK, C.A.,<br />
B A R K E R , R.F., K E M P , J.D. and H A L L ., T.C. 1983: Phaseolin Gene from<br />
Bean Is Expressed after Transfer to Sunflower via Tumor-inducing Plasmid<br />
Vectors. - Science 222: 476-482.<br />
NORDLEE, J.A., TAYLOR, S.L., TOWNSEND, J.A., THOMAS, L.A. and<br />
B U S H , R.K. 1996: Identification of a Brazil-nut Allergen in Transgenic<br />
Soybeans. - New England Journal of Medicine 334: 688-692.<br />
POPPY, G.M. and W I L K I N S O N M.J. 2005: Gene Flow from GM Plants. -<br />
Blackwell Publishing.<br />
RITALA, A., NUUTILA, A.M., AIKASALO, R., KAUPPINEN, V. and<br />
T A M M I S O L A , J. 2002: Measuring Gene Flow in the Cultivation of Transgenic<br />
Barley. Crop Science 42: 278-285.<br />
SCHELL, J., Van MONTAGU, M., HOLSTERS, M., ZAMBRYSKI, P.,<br />
J O O S , H., I N Z E , D., H E R R E R A - E S T R E L L A , L., D E P I C K E R , A., D e
149<br />
Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />
BLOCK, M., CAPLAN, A., DHAESE, P., Van HAUTE, E.,<br />
HERNALSTEENS, J-P., De GREVE, H., LEEMANS, J.,<br />
DEBLAERE, R., WILLMITZER, L., SCHRODER, J. and<br />
O T T E N , L . 1983: Ti Plasmids as Experimental Gene Vectors for Plants.<br />
Advances in Gene Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. -<br />
Miami Winter Symposia Vol. 20: 191-209.<br />
Z U O , J., N I U , Q.W., M O L L E R , S.G. and C H U A , N.H. 2001: Chemical-regulated,<br />
Site-specific DNA Excision in Transgenic Plants. - Nature Biotechnology 19:<br />
157-161.<br />
Received: 27.04.2007.
150<br />
Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:151-152<br />
Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) P a r l NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />
Vera BIBERDŽIĆ 1<br />
1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg Vojvode Bećir Bega Osmanagića 16,<br />
81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu<br />
During macrophyta research of Skadar Lake and its surroundings, the species<br />
Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl was found, representing the first finding of this taxon<br />
in Montenegro. A very small population of floating leaves was found at the locality<br />
called Pančeva oka.<br />
Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl represents the remainder of the tertiary<br />
hydrophyte flora in our country and in the Balkan Peninsula. In phylogenetic respect, it<br />
is most similar to Alisma genus, which is characterized by a cosmopolitan distribution.<br />
Pollination is entomophilic, and the dispersal of seeds is hydrochory i.e. by water. It is<br />
vegetatively propagated via adventitious tree buds, blossoms in July and August. It<br />
belongs to the subtropical flora component.<br />
Genus Caldesia Parl. is represented in the European Flora by one species:<br />
Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl. (T u t i n et al. 1964-1980) and it is generally<br />
distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia and Australia. In the<br />
temperate zone of Eurasia it is also distributed disjointly: one part of the areal can be<br />
found in Central and Southern Europe (to France to the west, to Ukraine to the east,<br />
to Lithuania to the north and to central Italy to the south) (T u t i n et al 1964-1980,<br />
Vukojič i ć , S., J a n k o v i ć , M. 1999), while the other one involves eastern Asia<br />
(Manchuria, China, Japan).<br />
Prodromus Flore penisulae Balcanicae, Hayek 1932-1933, records that Caldesia<br />
parnassifolia (Bassi) Parl is present in Bosnia and Herzegovina?, Serbia and Bulgaria.<br />
The species has also been recorded in Croatia (N i k o l i ć , T. 2005)<br />
The taxon has been included in the European Red List for Flora. It has also<br />
been included in the List of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife<br />
and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) and in the List of Species of the Habitats<br />
Directive (Annex IIb, IVb.)<br />
In future research, we will try to find this taxon at other localities as well, to<br />
determine the size of the population and to identify the degree to which it is<br />
endangered in Montenegrin flora.
152<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
LITERATURE<br />
H A Y E K , A. 1932-1933: Prodromus Florae Penisulae Balcanicae. - 3 Fedes Repert.<br />
(Beih) 30.<br />
NIKOLIĆ , T., T O P I Ć J. ur. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Republike<br />
Hrvatske. Kategorije EX,RE,CR,EN i VU. - Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod<br />
za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb, 4-695.<br />
TUTIN, T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE,<br />
D. H., WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964 - 1980: Flora Europaea 1-<br />
5. - Cambridge University Press.<br />
VUKOJIČ I Ć , S., J A N K O V I Ć , M. 1999: Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl u<br />
Stevanović, V.: Crvena knjiga flore Srbije, 1, Taksoni iščezli iz Srbije. -<br />
Ministarstvo za životnu sredinu Republike Srbije, 57-136.<br />
Received: 08.11.2007.
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:153-160<br />
ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.,<br />
Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L.<br />
AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />
Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) Nejc J O G A N 2)<br />
1)<br />
Faculty of Science, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, denist@cg.yu<br />
2) Department of Biology BF, University in Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia,<br />
nejc.jogan@bf.uni-lj.si<br />
Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.<br />
According to compilation by R o h l e n a 1942 later amended by P u l e v i ć<br />
2005 in the flora of Montenegro genus Setaria PB. is represented with only 3 species:<br />
Setaria glauca (= Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.), S. verticillata (L.) PB. and<br />
S. viridis (L.) PB.<br />
Recently, two additional taxa of Setaria have been recorded: S. verticilliformis<br />
Dum. and S. viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel.<br />
The first mentioned species has been recorded in the city area of Podgorica (city<br />
lawns, waste places and roadsides). Using keys in Pignati (1982a) species can be<br />
determined as S. ambigua Guss. Checking additional literature sources (H i t c h o c k<br />
1950, C l a y t o n 1980, W i s s k i r c h e n & H a e u p l e r 1998, M a r t i n č i ć<br />
1999, A e s c h i m a n n et al 2004, F i s c h e r et al 2005,<br />
http://herbarium.usu.edu/treatments/Setaria.htm), we noticed that opinion about<br />
taxonomic status of this taxon differs between authors. According to ITIC (Integrated<br />
Taxonomic Information System - http://itis.gov/) its accepted scientific name is S.<br />
verticilliformis Dumort. Some more important synonyms are listed below:<br />
= Setaria verticillata (L.) PB. var. ambigua (Guss.) Parl.<br />
= Setaria verticillata × viridis<br />
= Setaria ambigua (Guss.) Guss., non Schraeder<br />
= Setaria decipiens Schimp. ex Nyman<br />
= Setaria gussonei Kerg.<br />
S. verticilliformis is thermocosmopolitan species (P i g n a t i 1982a), so we<br />
presume that the reason why it was not reported for the flora of Montenegro up to<br />
now, might be its confusion with similar S. verticillata or S. viridis.<br />
Photos of panicles of these 3 Setaria species, macrodetails of rachis and<br />
bristles, and some distinguishing characters are given below:
154<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
bristles are retroversly scabrous, rachis is retroversly scabrous<br />
bristles are mostly antroversly scabrous, rachis is antroversly scabrous<br />
Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />
bristles are antroversly scabrous, rachis is hispid and villous
155<br />
Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />
Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvelev<br />
Taxonomy of the group of closely related taxa between wild S. viridis on one<br />
side and cultivated S. italica, on the other, is quite blurred. Most probably the reason<br />
for that is, that the wild mentioned species is supposed to be a progenitior of the<br />
cultivated one, so they are morphologically linked by an array of intermediates. Those,<br />
more resembling typical S. viridis are often recognized as S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma<br />
and the ones closer to typical S. italica but still retaining some “wild” character states<br />
as presence of bristles, disarticulating ripe spikelets etc. are called S. italica subsp.<br />
moharia (Alef.) Koern. Main distinguishing characters delimiting mentioned subspecies<br />
of S. viridis are (compiled by Jogan in Martinčič et al. 2007):<br />
- Stem more than 80 cm high (less than 50 (80) cm in type subsp.)<br />
- Panicle lobed and interrupt towards the base, more than (0.8) 1.2 cm wide (vs.<br />
not lobed and up to 0.6 (0.8) cm wide)<br />
- Spikelets (2.2) 2.4-2.6 (2.8) mm long (and only (1.8) 2-2.4 (2.5) mm in subsp.<br />
viridis)<br />
The most important synonyms of S. viridis<br />
subsp. pycnocoma are:<br />
- Setaria viridis (L.) PB. var. major<br />
(Gaudin) Peterm.<br />
- Setaria gigantea (Franch. & Sav.)<br />
Makino<br />
- Setaria pycnocoma (Steud.) Nakai<br />
- Panicum comosum Steud.
156<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
As an obligate segetal weed, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma, is supposed to be of<br />
a hybrid origin between cultivated and wild growing relatives mentioned above.<br />
Darmency (2005) compiled a “dynamic” model of possible relationship among wild,<br />
weedy, crop and feral forms in the Setaria italica/S. viridis group:<br />
Species Process Resulting Type Conclusion Likelihood<br />
S. viridis Selection by man S. italica Domestication High<br />
S. italica Seed lost at harvest S. italica Volunteerism Very low<br />
S. italica Back mutation S. viridis ssp.<br />
pycnocoma<br />
S. viridis Genetic variability S. viridis ssp.<br />
pycnocoma<br />
S. italica and<br />
S.viridis<br />
Interspecific gene<br />
flow<br />
S. viridis ssp.<br />
pycnocoma<br />
Endoferality<br />
Mimicry<br />
Exoferality<br />
Hyper<br />
rare<br />
Possible<br />
High<br />
In Montenegro, up to now, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma has been recorded in<br />
Gornji Kokoti (roadside Podgorica – Cetinje), but we can expect its scattered<br />
occurrence also in other lowland parts of the country. Its recent discovery in the<br />
discussed territory (together with the first discovered S. decipiens) showed a need for<br />
taxonomic revision of this genus in the flora of Montenegro.<br />
Impatiens balsamina L. (fam. Balsaminaceae)<br />
In the flora of Montenegro, genus Impatiens L. was present with only one<br />
species - Impatiens noli tangere (R o h l e n a 1942, P u l e v i ć 2005), which is<br />
according to M o o r e (1968) the only Impatiens species native to Europe. All others<br />
are neophytes from Asia and North America (M o o r e 1968, S l a v n i k 1995).<br />
During our field survey undertaken on June 22, 2007, at waste place on Tološko<br />
polje, we have found a few indviduals of unfamiliar Imaptiens, later identified as<br />
Impatiens balsamina (M o o r e 1968, P i g n a t i 1982b). It is annual, up to 1m tall,<br />
with alternate, eliptical to lanceolate-obovate leaves, with serrate margins and 15-20<br />
teeth on each side. Flowers are solitary or in groups up to 3 in leaf axils, pinkish to<br />
purplish to white. Capsula pubescent.
157<br />
Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />
Impatiens noli tangere<br />
Impatiens balsamina<br />
Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />
Impatiens balsamina originates from South East Asia and just after its<br />
introduction to Europe (1542) it stared to spread spontaneously (http://www.bbg.org/<br />
gar2/topics/plants/handbooks/flowers/5b.html).<br />
According to available sources I. balsamina is reported in several European<br />
countries as ephemeral escape from the gardens (Italy, UK, Czech Republic, Austria,<br />
Hungary; P i g n a t i 1982b, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, P y š e k et al. 2002, E<br />
s s l & R a b i t s c h 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004), occasionally naturalized<br />
(Austria, France, Italy, Czech Republic, (?)Yugoslavia; M o o r e 1968, G r e t u e r et<br />
al. 1984) or maybe even an invasive alien species in E Europe (http://www.sevin.ru/<br />
invasive/dbases/plants/species.html).<br />
In some other regions of the world, such as in Austral-Pacific region (http://www.<br />
gisp.org/downloadpubs/AP_NATIO.PDF), Pacific islands (http://www.hear.org/pier/reports/<br />
kiribati_appendix1.htm), Micronesia (http://www.hear.org/pier/pdf/kosrae_report.pdf),<br />
Peru (http://i3n.iabin.net/documents/progress_peru_cbd_informe.doc), etc... I. balsamina<br />
has status of invasive species.<br />
Considering the appearance of I. balsamina at Tološko polje, we presume its<br />
seeds were brought here with the waste from nearby gardens, in which it is grown as<br />
an ornamental plant, so in Montenegro it can be only an ephemeral garden escape.
158<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
Catalpa bignonioides Walt. (fam. Bignoniaceae)<br />
Catalpa bignonioides (photo by Danijela Stešević)<br />
Catalpa bignonioides originates from South East part of North America. It is very<br />
decorative deciduous tree, up to 15m high, with rounded to broad crown. Leaves are<br />
opposite, with simple, broadly egg- shaped leaflet up to 30cm long, sometimes with<br />
one or two lateral lobes. Petiole is up to 16cm long. Flowers are big (3-4 cm), white<br />
and two lipped, with two yellow strips in inner part as well as purple spots.<br />
Inflorescence is a panicle. It is flowering in July. It reproduces by seeds and<br />
vegetatively (Š i l i ć 1990).<br />
Common catalpa is deliberately introduced in Europe as an ornamental plant<br />
and as growing wild it is reported for several countries but mostly only as an<br />
ephemeral escape (e.g. Italy, UK, Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary; P i g n a t i<br />
1982b, G r e u t e r et al. 1984, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, E s s l & R a b i t s c<br />
h 2002, P y š e k et al. 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004). It may be more<br />
problematic only in Spain (D a n a et al. 2005 reports its weedy occurrence in<br />
Andalucia) and possibly also an invader in some parts of E Europe<br />
(http://www.sevin.ru/invasive/dbases /plants/species.html), but the definition of “invader” in<br />
the sense of that source is not clear-cut.
159<br />
Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />
During the field survey undertaken on June 7, 2007 over the city area of<br />
Podgorica, at the left bank of the River Morača - near Botun, we have found a single<br />
individual of common Catalpa. Due to the fact that this species reproduces by seeds,<br />
we presume that the seed is brought by birds or wind from the nearby gardens where<br />
it is planted as ornamental.<br />
LITERATURE<br />
A E S C H I M A N, D., L A U B E R, K., M O E S E R, D.M., T H E Y R I L L A T, J.P. 2004:<br />
Flora Alpina 1, Haupt. 1159 pp.<br />
B O T O N D, M. & Z O L T Á N, B.D. eds. 2004: Biological Invasions in Hungary. Invasive<br />
Plants. - Természet BUVAR Alapítvány Kiadó<br />
C L A Y T O N, (1980): Setaria Beauv, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 5.,<br />
Cambridge, p. 263-264<br />
C L E M E N T, E.J. & F O S T E R, M.C. 1994: Alien Plants of the British Isles. - Botanical<br />
Society of the British Isles, London. 603 pp.<br />
D A N A, E.D., S A N Z, M., V I V A S, S. and S O B R I N O, E. 2005: Especies Vegetales<br />
Invasoras en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía<br />
D A R M E N C Y H. 2005: Incestuous Relations of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) with<br />
Its Parents and Cousins. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop Ferality and Volunteerism. CRC<br />
Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–96<br />
E S S L, F. & R A B I T S C H, W. eds. 2002: Neobiota in Österreich. - Umweltbundesamt<br />
GmbH, Wien. 432 pp.<br />
F I S C H E R, M. A., W. A D L E R & K. O S W A L D, 2005: Exkursionsflora. Österreich,<br />
Liechtenstein, Südtirol. - Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen,<br />
Linz, 1373 pp.<br />
G R E U T E R, W., B U R D E T, H.M., L O N G, G. eds. 1984: Med-Checklist- Pteridophyta<br />
(ed. 2) Gymnospermae Dicotiledones (Acanthaceae-Cneoraceae), Conservatoire<br />
et jardin botaniques de la Ville de Geneve. 330 pp.<br />
H I T C H C O C K, A. S. 1950: Manual of the Grasses of the United States, 2nd ed.<br />
(Revised by A. Chase.) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1051 pp.<br />
M A R T I N Č I Č, A., T. W R A B E R, N. J O G A N, A. P O D O B N I K, B. T U R K,<br />
B. V R E Š, V. R A V N I K, B. F R A J M A N, S. S T R G U L C K R A J Š E K,<br />
B. T R Č A K, T. B A Č I Č. M. A. F I S C H E R, K. E L E R & B. S U R I N A,<br />
2007: Mala flora Slovenije. 4. izd. Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana. 845 pp.<br />
M O O R E, D.M. 1968: Impatiens L, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 2.,<br />
Cambridge, p. 240-241<br />
R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21, pp. 506<br />
P I G N A T I, S. 1982a: Flora d’ Italia, vol 3, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 612-613<br />
P I G N A T I, S. 1982b: Flora d’ Italia, vol 2, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 72-73, 618<br />
P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular Flora of Montenegro, Special <strong>edition</strong><br />
of The Republic Institute for Nature Protection of Montenegro, Podgorica. pp.<br />
218
160<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
S L A V N I K, B. 1995: Rod Impatiens v České republice, Preslia 67: 193–211.<br />
P Y Š E K, P., S A L D O, J. & M A N D A K, B. 2002: Catalogue of Alien Plants of the<br />
Check Republic, Preslia 74: 97-186<br />
Š I L I Ć, Č. 1990: Ukrasno drveće i grmlje, IP “Svjetlost”, Zavod za udžbenike i<br />
nastavna sredstva, Sarajevo - Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva,<br />
Beograd, 221 pp.<br />
W I S S K I R C H E N, R. & H A E U P L E R, H. 1998: Standardliste der Farn- und<br />
Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands, Stuttgart: Ulmer, 765 pp.<br />
Received: 14.11.2007
NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:161-163<br />
Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF<br />
MONTENEGRO<br />
Igor T O M O V I Ć 1) & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) ∗<br />
1) Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />
∗ Corresponding author denist@cg.yu<br />
According to two capital papers about the flora of Montenegro R o h l e n a (1942)<br />
& P u l e v i ć (2005) and recently published contributions to the flora of Montenegro<br />
(Stešević 2005, 2006a, 2006b, H a dž i a b l a h o v i ć 2006, etc.), we can conclude<br />
that record of Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke in Berane presents its first record for<br />
the flora of Montenegro.<br />
This South East Asian ornamental plant belogs to family Rosaceae. It is<br />
characterized by perennial herbaceous form, with epigeal rooting stolons. Stem is up<br />
to 50cm; leaves are trifoliate, rather long petiolate, with obovate, crenate leaflets and<br />
lanceolate stipules; flowers are yellow, solitary nor or slightly exceeding the leaves;<br />
sepals are 10mm, epicalyx segments broadly ovate, exceeding the sepals; petals 8<br />
mm; receptacle strongly, bright red, tasteless (V a l e n t i n e 1968).<br />
Due to the its ecological preferences (J a c k o w i a k 1992; L a u b e r & W a g n e r<br />
2001) species mostly inhabits relatively moist, nitrophilous and shaded habitats.<br />
At the first sight it looks likes native strawberry. Characters that clearly<br />
distinguish these species are given in table below:<br />
Native strawberry (Fragaria)<br />
Sepals are nearly equal<br />
Flowers are white<br />
Fruits are juicy, sweet and with pleasant<br />
aroma<br />
Indian strawberry (Duchesnea)<br />
Outer sepals are bigger that inner<br />
Flowers are yellow<br />
Fruits are juicy, sour and without aroma<br />
Photos by: Danijela Stešević
162<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />
Duchesnea has worldwide distribution. According to W e b e r (2003)<br />
geographical regions where it grows as native are: Northern Europe (Scandinavia:<br />
Finland, Norway, Sweden); British Isles; Central Europe (Austria, Benelux states,<br />
Denmark, France without the Mediterranean border, Germany, Switzerland); Southern<br />
Europe (Southern France, Greece, Italy, Spain); Eastern Europe (all European states<br />
east of Austria, Germany, Italy); European part of Russia, European part of Turkey,<br />
Mediterranean Islands; Northern Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco); Tropical<br />
Africa (All African states between northern and southern Africa); Southern Africa<br />
(Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland); Temperate Asia (Middle East, China,<br />
Japan, Asian part of Russia); Tropical Asia (India, Sri Lanka, all states east of India<br />
and bordering the south of China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines); Australia, New<br />
Zealand, Canada + Alaska; South-eastern USA (States of continental USA bordering<br />
the Gulf of Mexico: Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, eastern Texas); Western<br />
USA (States of continental USA bordering the Pacific Ocean); Remaining USA (All<br />
states of continental USA between western and south-eastern USA); Mexico; Tropical<br />
South America (all states of continental South America beyond Mexico and except<br />
Argentina, Chile, Uruguay); Chile; Argentina; Cape Verde; Canary + Madeira; Azores;<br />
South Atlantic Islands; Madagascar and Hawaii.<br />
It is presumed that its introduction in Europe dates from the beginning of 19 th<br />
Century (http://uk.encarta.msn.com/media_1481569451_781532557-1_1/Introduced_<br />
Species_in_Europe.html).<br />
First record of Duchesnea indica for the territory of former Yugoslavia (village<br />
Turčin, near Varaždin in Croatia) was reported by T r i n a j s t i ć (1973). In his opinion<br />
species started to spread spontaneously from Graz (Austria), via valley of river Drava.<br />
For current distribution of Duchesnea in Croatia see Flora Croatica Database<br />
(http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd/).<br />
Data about distribution of Indian strawberry in Slovenia are available in J o g a n<br />
(2001).<br />
In the region species is also reported in Serbia (J o v a n o v i ć , 1994).<br />
At the territory of Montenegro spontaneously growing population of Duchesnea<br />
indica is found in periurban area of Berane, at shady ruderal habitat type. Pathway of<br />
its arrival remains unknown. Considering the fact that in Berane and in surrounding<br />
area, Indian strawberry is not planted as ornamental plant, we exclude the possibility<br />
that it escaped from cultivation.<br />
We believe that further data about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region<br />
will help us to create precise hypothesis about the pathway of its arrival and spread<br />
over the territory of Montenegro.<br />
Acknowledgement: We would like to thank Prof. Vlado Matevski and dr. Ljiljana Topalić for<br />
valuable communications about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region.
163<br />
Tomović, Stešević: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, new alien species in the flora of Montenegro<br />
LITERATURE<br />
H A DŽ I A B L A H O V I Ć, S. 2006: Floristic and chorological additions to the vascular<br />
flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the II International Symposium of Ecologists<br />
of the Republic of Montenegro, p. 93-101<br />
J A C K O W I A K, B. 1992: On the distribution of Duchesnea indica (Rosaceae) in<br />
Vienna. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 37: 593-547.<br />
J O G A N, N. ed. 2001: Materials for the Atlas of Flora of Slovenia, Centre for<br />
Cartography of fauna and flora, Ljubljana, pp. 443<br />
J O V A N O V I Ć, S. 1994: Ecological study of ruderal flora and vegetation of Belgrade,<br />
Faculty of Biology, University in Belgrade, 222 pp.<br />
L A U B E R, K. & W A G N E R, G. 2001: Flora Helvetica, Paul Haupt ed., Bern-<br />
Stuttgart-Wien, 1615 pp.<br />
R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21<br />
P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular flora of Montenegro. - Special <strong>edition</strong><br />
of Republic institute for Nature Protetion of Montenegro, Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />
S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O V A N O V I Ć S. 2005b: Contribution to the knowledge of non<br />
indigenous flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the Workshop devoted to 25 th<br />
Anniversary of the Faculty of Sciences nad Mathematics, University of<br />
Montenegro, Podgorica 8-9 September 2005, p. 65-78<br />
S T E Š E V I Ć, D. 2006a: Gagea chrysantha (Jan) Schultes & Schultes fil. and Linaria<br />
genistifolia (L.) Miller subsp. genistifolia two new taxon in the flora of<br />
Montenegro. - Proceedings of II Interanational Symposium of Ecologist of the<br />
Republic of Montenegro, Kotor 20-24. September 2006, p. 69-72<br />
S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O G A N, N. 2006a: Two new neophytes in the flora of<br />
Montenegro: Artemisia verlotiorum and Sporobolus vaginiflorus. - Natura<br />
Montenegrina, 5: 173-175<br />
T R I N A J S T I Ć, I. 1973: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke (Rosaceae), nova<br />
adventivna vrsta u flori Jugoslavije.- Acta Botanica Croatica 32: 261-266, Zagreb<br />
V A L E N T I N E, D. H. 1968: Duchesnea Sm., in Tutin at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol.<br />
2., Cambridge, p. 48<br />
W E B E R, E. 2003: Invasive plant species of the world. A reference guide to<br />
environmental weeds. - CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 560 pp.<br />
Received: 14.11.2007
164<br />
Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007