26.05.2014 Views

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

ISSN 1451-5776 CD-Rom edition - Prirodnjacki muzej Crne Gore

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>‐<strong>5776</strong> <strong>CD</strong>‐<strong>Rom</strong> <strong>edition</strong>


Natura Montenegrina journal for science and popular science<br />

PUBLISHED BY:<br />

IZDAVAČ:<br />

Natural History Museum of Montenegro<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

Editor in chief - Glavni urednik:<br />

Technical editor - Tehnički urednik:<br />

Marko KARAMAN<br />

Snežana DRAGIĆEVIĆ<br />

EDITORIAL - REDAKCIJA<br />

Akad. Prof. Dr Gordan Karaman<br />

Prof. Dr Sreten Mandić<br />

Prof. Dr Drago Marić<br />

Prof. Dr Milivoje Purić<br />

Dr Vlado Pešić<br />

Ondrej Vizi<br />

Marko Karaman M.Sc.<br />

Suzana Brajović M.Sc.<br />

Mr Gordana Kasom M.Sc.<br />

Danijel Vincek<br />

Electronic arrangement of <strong>CD</strong> ROM: Sreten Šćepanović,<br />

Elektronska obrada diska: Marko Karaman<br />

Logo designer:<br />

Lazar Jakovljević<br />

Dizajn logoa:<br />

ON LINE EDITION: www.pmcg.cg.yu/Natura_Montenegrina.html<br />

<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155 On line <strong>edition</strong><br />

address for contact and exchange / adresa za kontakt i razmjenu:<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF MONTENEGRO<br />

P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

E-mail: natura@pmcg.cg.yu


Natura Montenegrina<br />

Journal for science and popular science<br />

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS<br />

"Natura Montenegrina" publishes scientific, professional and scientific-popular<br />

papers from the field of biology, geology, forestry, biotechnique and environmental<br />

protection, surveys of scientific and professional publications, reviews and releases on<br />

scientific meetings, photographs from the nature and information of general<br />

significance.<br />

"Natura Montenegrina" is published exclusively in electronic form, as <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong><br />

(<strong>ISSN</strong> <strong>1451</strong>-<strong>5776</strong>) and in On-line <strong>edition</strong> (<strong>ISSN</strong> 1800-7155) at web address of Natural<br />

History Museum of Montenegro www.pmcg.co.me.<br />

Manuscripts are submitted to the Editorial office (Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, PO.O.Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Crna Gora (Montenegro), in two<br />

copies, legibly typed on paper of format A4 with double spacing and margin of 4 cm on<br />

the left side, with not more than 30 rows on one page and on floppy disks, <strong>CD</strong> or DVD<br />

discs. To avoid hard copy, papers could be send on E-mail: natura@pmcg.co.me<br />

Manuscripts of scientific and professional papers are published exclusively in the<br />

English Language. Authors whose native language is not English are encouraged to<br />

have their manuscripts read by a native English-speaking colleague before submission.<br />

Instruction for the work on the computer: Word 6.0 or more recent; font Arial, 10<br />

pt, distance between the letters 0.5 pt, titles and subtitles without Caps Lock, spacing<br />

single. Use in text as little formatting as possible (use only bold and italics where<br />

necessary). Special symbols (e.g. male or female sign) should be avoided because they<br />

are likely to be altered when files are read on different computers. You can code them<br />

as m# and f#, which can be replaced during page setting.<br />

- The title should be concise and informative.<br />

- The full name of the author(s) must be given below the title and should be<br />

typed in the upper case.<br />

- The address of each author should be given below the name of author(s). E-mail<br />

address(es) should be provided if possible.<br />

- The address in scientific and professional papers is followed by a brief synopsis<br />

(summary) in the English Language, than title and synopsis in<br />

Montenegrin/Serbian/other. Synopsis, (till 10 rows) consists of the data on<br />

thematics of the paper and the key words are given at the end. Abstract (summary,<br />

synopsis) in English Language are obligatory. Abstracts in other languages<br />

(Montenegrian, Serbian or other) we suggest to be included in addition to English<br />

abstract. Authors may submit longer extracts (summary) in<br />

Montenegrian/Serbian/other at the end of the paper. Papers which have already been<br />

published either in their entity or in essential parts shall not be accepted for<br />

publishing.<br />

Scientific paper, as a rule, should have the following chapters: introduction,<br />

subject and method of research/work, results with discussion, conclusion, which should<br />

provide a clear and brief picture of the research and obtained results, list of literature<br />

used and (optionally) summary in the alternative language. The arrangement of the<br />

main text may varies with different types of papers, but should start with an<br />

introduction and end with list of literature.<br />

All literature cited in the text must be listed in the references in the following<br />

format:<br />

3


- Journal paper:<br />

MARIĆ, D., ĆIROVIĆ, R. 2002: Morphological Characteristics of Bass (Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus,<br />

1758) (Percidae, Pisces) from Skadar Lake. - Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica,1: 125-134, .<br />

- Book chapter:<br />

COBLE, D. & KNEŽEVIĆ, B. 1981: Growth and mortality of bleak (Alburnus albidus alborella) and<br />

carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Lake Skadar. In: Karaman, G.S. & Beeton, A.M. (Eds), The Biota and<br />

Limnology of Lake Skadar. - Biološki zavod Titograd, Smithsonian Institution Washington. pp:<br />

320-333.<br />

- Book:<br />

BOLTON, B. 1995: A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. - Harward University Press,<br />

Cambridge, Mass., London, 504 pp.<br />

- Internet resources:<br />

AUTHOR (year): Title of website, database or other resources. - Publisher name and location (if<br />

indicated), number of pages (if known). Available from: http://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx (Date of last<br />

access)<br />

- Disertations and non-serial proceedings of symposia/conferences are to be treated as<br />

books and cited as such.<br />

Jornal titles must be written in full (not abbreviated).<br />

The names of quoted authors are written expanded 2.5 pt; the year of publishing of<br />

mentioned quotation comes next. Scientific names of the taxa are written in italics. The name of<br />

the author of a taxon is quoted only the first time in the text and on the figure, subsequently it is<br />

not quoted, provided that the text does not loose its clarity.<br />

Scope of one manuscript is limited to 16 pages (2,000 symbols per page) where two<br />

illustrations equal one page. Exceptionally, if the contents and quality justify that, the papers may<br />

have larger scope.<br />

Texts for the tables, figures and other contributions are written separately from the main<br />

text, author clearly designates in the text, respectively on margin of the manuscript on the paper<br />

the place on which that contribution should be inserted.<br />

Graphs, tables and drawings are submitted made in Indian ink on white or on paus paper in<br />

larger format (A4 format desirable) than it will be in the publication, or they should be made in<br />

appropriate program (Word, Excel, Corel-Draw). Photographs should be clear, with contrast on<br />

shining paper.<br />

Should the paper contain scanned contributions they should be submitted in TIFF, .BMP or<br />

.JPG format with resolution of 200 dpi.<br />

Summary in Montenegrin/Serbian/other should be brief, sufficient to acquaint the reader<br />

with the character of the paper, results and conclusions regarding the problem dealt with. Above<br />

the text of the summary there should be the name and the address of the author and the title of<br />

the paper.<br />

Scientific-popular and other articles should present interesting things and events from the<br />

nature. They are submitted in English and the Montenegrin/Serbian language; should the author<br />

fail to do so the editorial board is entitled to have the paper trenslated into the alternative<br />

language. They should be original, written in a clear, readable style, illustrated by the quality<br />

photographs. The authorship of the photographs has to be clearly indicated. Original photographs<br />

or scanned ones with resolution of 200 dpi should be submitted. The original negative may be<br />

submitted, and the slides must be submitted in the original.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

Editor in chief<br />

4


Dear Colleagues,<br />

The Natural History Museum of Montenegro has published the Journal of<br />

science and popular-science „NATURA MONTENEGRINA“ since 2001 in<br />

electronic format and has distributed its <strong>CD</strong> <strong>edition</strong>. At its beginings the journal<br />

was primarily designated for the increasing number of young Montenegrian<br />

scientists, mostly biologists and other related fields, as a medium that presented<br />

their scientific findings.<br />

Six years later we are changing our goals – to become a journal that will<br />

publish original scientific and professional articles in the fields of<br />

research, protection and popularization of natural values and thus<br />

represent an important source of scientific information from the Balkan region.<br />

The biodiversity of Balkan Peninsula is still the least explored part of Europe.<br />

Therefore, we believe that journals like this one, which originate in this region,<br />

should be committed to present data about our biodiversity to the rest of the<br />

world.<br />

Beside scientific and professional articles, we will also publish short<br />

communications – significant scientific contributions that do not fulfill, in their<br />

entirety, the requirements for a scientific or professional article.<br />

The third component of the Journal is popular science. Your institute or<br />

organization celebrates a jubilee, you want to present the progress of your<br />

project, or photographs of nature research activity ... these are the reasons to<br />

publish popular scientific articles that will be interesting to the scientific<br />

comunity as well as to a broader audience.<br />

»NATURA MONTENEGRINA« is distributed to more than 350 locations<br />

worldwide. Contents of previous volumes and the abstracts of published papers<br />

can be accessed on our website www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm.<br />

You can send your articles to the following e-mail address:<br />

natura@pmcg.cg.yu . The Instructions for Authors are available on our website<br />

and on page 6.<br />

We also welcome scientist interested in refereeing articles sent to our journal.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

Chief Editor<br />

5


Poštovane kolege,<br />

Prirodnjački <strong>muzej</strong> <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> od 2001. godine izdaje naučni i<br />

naučno-popularni časopis “NATURA MONTENEGRINA” - časopis<br />

koji se izdaje u elektronskoj formi, a distribuira u vidu <strong>CD</strong> izdanja.<br />

Na početku postojanja časopis je bio namijenjen, prije svega,<br />

mladom crnogorskom naučnom kadru koji, na počecima svog<br />

naučnog djelovanja, nije imao veliki izbor časopisa za objavljivanje<br />

rezultata.<br />

Nakon šest godina postojanja usmjeravamo se ka novom cilju -<br />

prerastanju u časopis koji će NAUČNIM I STRUČNIM RADOVIMA<br />

IZ OBLASTI PROUČAVANJA, ZAŠTITE I POPULARIZACIJE<br />

PRIRODNIH VRIJEDNOSTI predstavljati značajan izvor informacija<br />

sa područja Balkana. Priroda Balkana je i dalje najslabije proučena u<br />

Evropi. Zato smatramo da upravo časopisi koji nastaju u ovom<br />

regionu treba da ostalom dijelu svijeta iznesu podatke o našoj<br />

prirodi.<br />

Pored naučnih i stručnih radova obraćamo Vam pažnju i na<br />

mogućnost objavljivanja KRATKIH SAOPŠTENJA - naučnih opažanja<br />

iz prirode, dovoljno značajnih da budu objavljena, ali koja ne<br />

ispunjavaju uslove da budu napisana kao naučni ili stručni članak.<br />

Treći segment časopisa je NAUČNO-POPULARNI DIO. Vaša<br />

institucija ili organizacija obiljezava neki jubilej, želite da objavite<br />

tok realizacije nekog projekta, zabilježili ste fotografijom posjetu<br />

nekom lokalitetu ... sve su to razlozi da objavite naučno-popularni<br />

članak - zanimljiv, kako stručnoj tako i laičkoj javnosti.<br />

U toku je odabir recenzenata, kako domaćih tako i inostranih<br />

stručnjaka u odredjenim oblastima prirodnih nauka. Time će kvalitet<br />

časopisa, pored redovnosti koju smo do sada postigli, biti podignuta<br />

na viši nivo. NATURA MONTENEGRINA se distribuira na vise od 350<br />

adresa širom svijeta. Sadržaj dosadasnjih brojeva i rezime radova<br />

mozete pogledati na web stranici:<br />

www.pmcg.cg.yu/natura_montenegrina.htm .<br />

Vaše priloge možete slati na adresu natura@pmcg.cg.yu, a<br />

UPUTSTVO AUTORIMA možete pogledati na stranici 6, kao I na<br />

našem web sajtu.<br />

Nadam se da ćemo saradjivati.<br />

Marko G. Karaman<br />

glavni urednik<br />

6


Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />

CONTENTS:<br />

NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6, 2007<br />

EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2<br />

INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3<br />

Foreword by editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />

Riječ urednika . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6<br />

I Scientific part<br />

BOTANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

ZOOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

BIOCHEMISTRY AND<br />

GENETICS . .<br />

II Short communications . . . .<br />

. . .<br />

I Naučni dio<br />

9 BOTANIKA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />

63 ZOOLOGIJA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />

123 BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA . . . . . . . . . . 123<br />

151 II Kratka saopštenja . . . . . . . . . . . . 151<br />

BOTANY:<br />

BOTANIKA:<br />

Rodica BERCU<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />

Nada BUBANJA, Vladimir STEVANOVIĆ, Dmitar LAKUŠIĆ<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE) IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN FLORA OF<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

9-17<br />

19-25<br />

27-30<br />

Rajko T R I P I Ć<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer 31-52<br />

monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />

Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ & Danka PETROVIĆ<br />

THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

ZOOLOGY:<br />

ZOOLOGIJA:<br />

Vera VUKANIĆ<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL DINAMIC OF THE PLANCTONIC<br />

POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />

Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ, Vladimir PEŠIĆ & Aleksandra ZEKOVIĆ<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE RIVER ZETA<br />

(MONTENEGRO)<br />

Jelena NIKČEVIĆ<br />

THE ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA,<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ, Tanja VUKOV<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />

Natalija ČAĐENOVIĆ<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />

53-61<br />

63-71<br />

73-89<br />

91-100<br />

101-109<br />

111-114<br />

Lidija POLOVIĆ, Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN<br />

(MONTENEGRO)<br />

115-122<br />

BIOCHEMISTRY AND GENETICS:<br />

BIOHEMIJA I GENETIKA:<br />

Nebojša JOCKOVIĆ, Milica PAVLOVIĆ, Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ and Nada KOVAČEVIĆ<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES: PHENOLIC ACIDS,<br />

FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />

123-129


Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica, 6/2007<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE OTHER<br />

METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ<br />

INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

131-136<br />

137-149<br />

II SHORT COMMUNICATIONS:<br />

II KRATKA SAOPŠTENJA:<br />

Vera BIBERDŽIĆ<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />

Danijela STEŠEVIĆ & Nejc JOGAN<br />

ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort., Setaria viridis (L.) PB.<br />

subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L. AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />

Igor TOMOVIĆ & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ<br />

Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />

151-152<br />

153-160<br />

161-163


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 9-17<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />

OF Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L.<br />

Rodica B E R C U 1<br />

1 Department of Botany, Faculty of Natural and Agriculture Sciences, “Ovidius” University,<br />

Mamaia Str. 124, 900590, Constantza, <strong>Rom</strong>ania, E-mail: rodicabercu@yahoo.com<br />

Key words:<br />

anatomy,<br />

variation,<br />

vascular system,<br />

estimation,<br />

Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The paper provides new data regarding the variation of the<br />

vascular system in the vegetative organs of Asplenium trichomanesramosum<br />

L. The anatomical structure of the adventitious root<br />

(starting up directly from the underground stem), rhizome (stem)<br />

and the frond’s petiole and rachis exhibit a diarch type root, a<br />

dictyostelic rhizome and an X- and T-shaped petiole and rachis<br />

vascular system up to the subterminal rachis. Based on the variation<br />

of the vascular system in A. trichomanes-ramosum anatomy we<br />

used a mathematical calculation to estimate the number of the<br />

vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. (syn. A. viride Huds.), known as bright<br />

green spleenwort or simple green spleenwort, is a perennial member of family A<br />

spleniaceae. The branching rhizomes are short, creeping to erect, bearing dark brown<br />

to black scales (C i o c a r l a n , 2000). The evergreen compound fronds, simply divided<br />

are tufted at the crown, 4–15 (-20) cm long; persistent to dying in the autumn and<br />

circinnate. The frond’s rachis is green and not winged.<br />

The petioles are often shorter than the blade. The petioles are brownish or<br />

blackish only near the base and green above. It grows in spring and fructifies in<br />

summer. The leaves disappear slowly during the next spring (W a t s o n . &<br />

D a l l w i t z , 2004).<br />

In <strong>Rom</strong>ania it grows in shaded crevices of limestone boulders, cool and moist<br />

places, up to an altitude above 1800m (S a v u l e s c u , 1952). Knowledge on the<br />

variations of the vascular system organization of the fern vegetative organs is quite<br />

limited (O g u r a , 1938, 1972, S c h n e i d e r , 1996), and that of A. trichomanes-


10<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

ramosum L. is almost lacking. The goal of the research was to examine the anatomy<br />

of the adventitious root, rhizome, and frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with plant morphology, habitat and the<br />

cutting level.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The plant was collected from the Bicaz Gorges in the Carpathians Mountains.<br />

Cross sections of the adventitious root, rhizome and the frond’s petiole and rachis of<br />

A. trichomnaes-ramosum were performed using a rotary microtome. The petiole and<br />

rachis structure were analyzed by serial cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from<br />

the base up to the rachis tip. The samples were stained with alum-carmine and iodine<br />

green and were embedded in Canada balsam. Observations were made with a<br />

BIOROM-T bright field microscope, equipped with a TOPICA-6001A video camera.<br />

The microphotographs were obtained from the video camera through a computer.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Cross sections of the adventitious root revealed that the cortex is composed of<br />

2-3 layers of large parenchyma cells (Fig. 1). The inner cells of the cortex are<br />

modified and have thick walls. Kroemer (1903) has suggested that this wall thickening<br />

is the result of cutinized blade superpositions. Some authors have noticed the<br />

presence of such “curious cells” around the stele and have suggested that this tissue<br />

belonged to the stele naming it “sclerenchymatous mass” (R u s s o w 1872,<br />

B i e r h o r s t 1971) or a “stereomic sheath” (de B a r y 1877, O g u r a 1938, B e r c u<br />

1998, 2006). This configuration has led S c h n e i d e r (1996) to ascribe this type of<br />

root to that of Asplenium. The stele consists of xylem and phloem and is surrounded<br />

by the pericycle (Fig. 1). The xylem vessels are joined together towards the center by<br />

their metaxylem vessels (two for each bundle). The protoxylem vessels (three for each<br />

bundle) are in an exarch position and face the pericycle. The phloem sieve cells,<br />

lacking companion cells, are located on either side of the xylem string. Thus the<br />

adventitious root of A. trichomanes-ramosum has a diarch structure. Remarkable are<br />

the passing cells (Fig. 1).<br />

Cross sections of the rhizome disclosed that the epidermis consists of a single<br />

layer of cells not covered by cuticle (Fig. 2A). Below the epidermis is the cortex,<br />

differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter consisting of<br />

large parenchyma cells. Remarkable is the abundance of starch grains in the cortical<br />

cells and endodermis as well (amiliferous sheath) (Fig. 2B). As O g u r a (1938) and<br />

B i r (1957) reported for Aspleniaceae species, the stele is a dictyostele composed of<br />

a variable number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each<br />

surrounded by its own endodermis (starch sheath) and pericycle. The latter is


11<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

composed of parenchyma cells regularly arranged in one row, (locally in two or even<br />

three rows). Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary structure (metaxylem<br />

vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the pericycle). The pith<br />

rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central area of the rhizome<br />

(Fig. 2B).<br />

Fig. 1. Cross section of the adventitious<br />

root, x 206: C- cortex; Mx- metaxylem; Pcpericycle;<br />

Ph- phloem; Px- protoxilem; SSsclerenchyma<br />

sheath.<br />

Fig 2. Cross sections of the rhizome. (A). Portion of the epidermis, cortex and stele, x 160: C-<br />

cortex, E – epidermis, GT – ground tissue, M- meristeles, Pi- pith, PiR- pith ray. (B) A stele<br />

vascular bundle (meristele), x 212: Ed- endodermis, Mx- metaxylem, Pc- pericycle, Ph- phloem, Pxprotoxylem.<br />

Cross section of the petiole base exhibits an epidermis, the cortex differentiated<br />

into an external (sclerenchzmatous) and an inner cortex, followed by a ground tissue.<br />

The vascular system of the leaf petiole base is composed of two meristeles, equal in<br />

size (distele). Each meristele is surrounded by an endodermis and a “special<br />

pericycle” (A n d r e i , 1978). The meristeles are composed of centrally located xylem<br />

elements surrounded by phloem. Protoxylem vessels are in an exarch position<br />

whereas the metaxylem vessels are in the centre. That is attributed to the stele a<br />

hadrocentric and distelic structure (Fig. 3).


12<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Fig. 3 Cross section of the leaf petiole<br />

base, x 83: E- epidermis, GT- ground<br />

tissue, IC- inner cortex, M- meristele,<br />

SC- sclerenchyma cortex.<br />

Fig. 4 Cross section of the leaf petiole (2 cm from the leaf base). (A) General view, x 64: C- cortex,<br />

E- epidermis, St- stele. (B) Portion of epidermis and cortex, x 272: E- epidermis, IC- inner cortex,<br />

SC-sclerenchymatic cortex. (C) The stele vascular bundle, x 266: Ed- endodermis, Pc- pericycle, Phphloem,<br />

Mx- metaxylem, Px- protoxylem.


13<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

Transverse sections of the petiole, cut from 2 cm above the leaf base, reveals a<br />

single-layered epidermis, covered by cuticle, a cortex and a centrally located stele<br />

(Fig. 4A). Below the epidermis of the base of the petiole is the sclerenchyma cortex<br />

(hypodermis), which consists of a few layers of compactly arranged sclerenchyma<br />

cells. The hypodermis is internally followed by a region of ground tissue (Fig. 4B). The<br />

stele is monofascicular. The vascular bundle is composed of centrally located xylem<br />

vessels surrounded by phloem. The stele X-shaped xylem elements possesses<br />

themetaxylem vessels in a central position and the protoxylem elements in an exarch<br />

arrangement, surrounded by phloem. That is attributed to the stele a hadrocentric<br />

structure (Fig. 4C).<br />

Cross sections of the rachis cut from 3-8 cm above the leaf petiole disclosed the<br />

same one-layered epidermis composed of cutinized-walled cells, covered by a thick<br />

cuticle, a cortex and a stele. The stele is monofascicular, composed of more or less T-<br />

shaped xylem vessels (meta- and protoxylem vessels) characteristic to most of the<br />

Aspleniaceae species (O g u r a 1972, B i r 1957; B e r c u 2004, 2005). Phloem<br />

surrounds the xylem elements as well (Fig. 5). Toward the subterminal leaf rachis<br />

remarkable is the reduced number of the vascular elements, surrounded by phloem<br />

and embedded in a homogenous mesophyll (Fig. 5A, C). The vascular elements are in<br />

a reduced number because of the veins marginal segments formation. Under the lower<br />

and upper epiderms of the rachis, sclerenchyma cells are present. They provide<br />

mechanical support to the weak and delicate rachis tip. A typical hypodermis is<br />

absent.<br />

Fig. 5 Cross section of the leaf rachis (3-8 cm<br />

above the leaf rachis), x 300.<br />

A. trichomanes-ramosum vegetative organs anatomy exhibits variations in the<br />

vascular system organization. The even and odd number of the vascular bundles<br />

(meristeles) may depend by the plant size, and organs diameter, the plant habitat<br />

ecotope and the cutting level. The mathematical distribution function takes into<br />

account of the ecological parameters such as soil humidity (U), temperature (T) and<br />

soil reaction – pH (R) (Table 1) settled by P o p e s c u and S a n d a (1998). The<br />

distribution function was based on S ă h l e a n u (1957), C e a p o i u (1968), S i r e ţ chi<br />

(1985) and N a s t a s e s c u et al. (1988) works.


14<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

The root (r) – the diameter = 0,1-0,5 mm:<br />

r<br />

N Aspl. t-r . = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 5 ·10 · 3,14 · 0,44 2 30,3954<br />

= = 1,028 ≈ 1 stele<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

The rhizome (rz) – the diameter = 1-1,5cm:<br />

rz<br />

N Aspl. t-r = (2n+1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 3 ·10 · 3,14 · 1,26 2 149,55<br />

=<br />

= = 5,06 ≈ 5 meristeles<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

The rachis (rh) – the diameter = 0,5-1 mm:<br />

pt. base<br />

a. N Aspl. t-r. = 2n K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 2 ·2·10· 3,14 · 0,69 2 = 59,798<br />

4e h 29,6 29,6<br />

= 2,02 ≈ 2 meristeles<br />

rh<br />

b. N Aspl. t-r. = (2n +1) K (a+b+c) πD 2 = 3 ·10· 3,14 · 0,92 2 = 79,73 = 1,01 ≈ 1 meristele<br />

4e h 4 · 2,71 3 78,732<br />

Where:<br />

r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />

N Aspl. t-r.– the function distribution of the vascular bundles in root (r), rhizome<br />

(rz), petiole base (pt. base) and rachis (rh);<br />

h – the distance (in cm) between two succesive sections;<br />

D – the vegetative organs diameter of the plant (in mm);<br />

e – the natural logarithm base (e = 2, 718);<br />

K (a+b+c) – the ecological constant of the plant depending of: humidity (a),<br />

temperature (b) and soil reaction (c);<br />

n – the multiplication order;<br />

2n – the even number of the vascular bundles;<br />

2n+1 – the odd number of the vascular bundles.<br />

NOTE: it is sufficient the estimation of<br />

r, rz, pt. base, rh<br />

N As t-r.<br />

only for n=1 sau n=2 value.


15<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

Table 1: The ecological preferences of A. trichomanes-ramosum<br />

The species<br />

Ecological parameters<br />

humidity<br />

(H)<br />

temperature<br />

(T)<br />

soil reaction<br />

(R)<br />

*The value of the<br />

ecological constant<br />

(K (a+b+c) )<br />

Asplenium<br />

trichomanesramosum<br />

L.<br />

mesohydrophyte<br />

4<br />

microtermous<br />

2<br />

Slightly neutroacidophilous<br />

4<br />

10<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The successive cross sections, cut from the rhizome and the frond’s petiole and<br />

rachis of A. trichomanes-ramosum L. disclose variations in the vascular system<br />

structure. The root is of diarch type. The rhizome is a dictyostele with a variable<br />

number of meristeles due to the number of the foliar traces. The petiole base vascular<br />

system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to the rachis tip<br />

the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to the tip).<br />

These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />

main habitat plant factors and the cutting level. The distribution formula can be<br />

extended to other members of this large group of plants.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A N D R E I , M . (1978): Anatomia plantelor. - Didactic and Pedagogic Publishing House,<br />

Bucharest, p. 227-229 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

B E R C U , R . (1998): Anatomical Modifications of the Corm Stele in Fern Asplenium<br />

septentrionale (L.) Hoffm. - Forestry, Sumarstvo, Belgrade 1: 35-40.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2004: Anatomical Aspects of Asplenium adiantum-nigrum L. - J. of Biol. Res.,<br />

vol. 2: 57-61.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2005: Anatomy of Asplenium ruta muraria L. - Studia bot. hung., vol. 36: 16-20.<br />

B E R C U , R . 2006: Histoanatomy of the Vegetative Organs of some Polypodiales species. -<br />

Ex Ponto, Constantza, 232p (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

B I E R H O R S T , D . W . 1971: Morphology of Vascular Plants. Collier - Macmillan Ldt.,<br />

Macmillan Co. London, New York, 296-298, 300-304.<br />

B I R , S . S . 1957: Stelar anatomy of indian Aspleniaceae, Abstract. - Proc. Ind. Sci. Congr.<br />

Association, Calcuta, 44: 232.


16<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

C E A P O I U , N . 1968: Statistics methods applied in agricultural and biological experiences.<br />

- Agro-Silvica Publishing House, Bucharest, p.201-203 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

C I O C Â R L A N , V . 2000: Ilustred Flora of <strong>Rom</strong>ania - Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. II<br />

<strong>edition</strong>, Ceres, Bucharest, p.90-92 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

d e B A R Y , A . 1877: Verigleichende Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Phanerogamen<br />

und Farne. - W. Engelmann, Leipzig, p.238-349 (in German)<br />

K R O E M E R , K. 1903: Wurzelhaut, Hypodermis und Endodermis der Angiospermenwurzel. -<br />

Biblioth. Bot., 12: 151 (in German).<br />

NASTASESCU, C., TENA, M., ANDREI Gh. and OTRASANU, I.<br />

1988: Problems of Algebraical Structures. - Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anian Acad., Bucharest,<br />

p.122-125 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

O G U R A , Y . 1938: Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der Pteridophyten. In: Handbuch der<br />

Pflanzeanatomie, Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, p.128-140 (in German).<br />

O G U R A , Y . 1972: Comparative Anatomy of Vegetative Organs of Pteridophytes, II <strong>edition</strong>,<br />

Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, Stuttgart, p.313-512.<br />

P O P E S C U , A a n d S A N D A , V . 1998: The Summary of the Spontaneous<br />

Cormophytes from the <strong>Rom</strong>anian Flora. - Acta Bot Horti., Bucharest, p.4-7 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

R U S S O W , E . 1872: Vergleichende Untersuchungen betreffend die Histologie der<br />

vegetativen und sporenbildenden Organe und die Entwicklung der Sporen der Leitbündel-<br />

Kryptogamen. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sc., St. Petersbourg, Sér. VII, 19: 1-207 (in German).<br />

S A V U L E S C U , T . (editor in chief). 1952: Flora Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, vol. 1, Editio Acad.<br />

Reip. Pop. <strong>Rom</strong>anicae, Bucharest, p.130-133 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian).<br />

S C H N E I D E R , H . 1996: The Root Anatomy of Ferns: a Comparative Study. - Pteridology<br />

in Perspective, Royal Botanical Garden, Kew, Whitstable, Litho Ltd., Whitstable, Kent:<br />

271-283.<br />

S I R E T C H I , G h . 1985: Differential and Integral Calculation (fundamental notions). -<br />

Enciclopedical and Stiintifical Publisher, Bucharest, p.325-326 (in <strong>Rom</strong>anian)<br />

W A T S O N , L . a n d M . J . D A L L W I T Z 2004: The Ferns (Filicopsida) of the British<br />

Isles. - Version: 28th November 2005. http://delta-intkey.com.<br />

Summary<br />

VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM<br />

OF ASPLENIUM TRICHOMANES-RAMOSUM L.<br />

In <strong>Rom</strong>ania Asplenium trichomanes-ramosum L. grows in shaded crevices of<br />

limestone boulders, cool and moist places, up to an altitude above 1800m. The goal of<br />

the research was to examine the anatomy of the adventitious root, rhizome, and<br />

frond’s petiole and rachis in order to find a mathematical distribution function to


17<br />

B e r c u : VARIATION IN THE ANATOMY OF THE VASCULAR SYSTEM …<br />

estimate the number of the vascular bundles in the fern vegetative organs in<br />

accordance with the plant morphology, habitat and the cutting level.<br />

The root, in cross section possesses a primary structure and the stele is a diarh<br />

one. Remarkable is the sclerenchimatous sheet around the stele (Fig. 1).<br />

Cross section of the rhizome discloses a single layered epidermis (Fig. 2A),<br />

cortex, differentiated into a sclerenchyma cortex and the inner cortex, the latter<br />

consisting of large parenchyma cells consisting of numerous starch grains followed by<br />

an amiliferous sheath (Fig. 2B). The stele is a dictyostele composed of a variable<br />

number of meristeles (in accordance with the number of foliar traces) each surrounded<br />

by its own endodermis and pericycle. Each meristeles is hadrocentric with a binary<br />

structure (metaxylem vessels towards the center and protoxylem elements facing the<br />

pericycle). The pith rays among the meristeles occur. The pith occupies the central<br />

area of the rhizome(Fig. 2B, C). The frond’s petiole and rachis were analyzed by serial<br />

cross sections (2 to 2 cm), distributed from the base up to the rachis tip. The petiole<br />

base vascular system is bifascicular whereas from 2 cm above the petiole base up to<br />

the rachis tip the vascular system is monostelic, first X-shaped and then T-shaped (to<br />

the tip). These expected results based on any earlier research permited us to find a<br />

mathematical distribution function to estimate the number of the vascular bundles in<br />

the fern vegetative organs in accordance with the plant size, the organs diameter, the<br />

main habitat plant factors and the cutting level.<br />

Received: 26. 11. 2007.


18<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 19-25<br />

EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA 1 , Vladimir S T E V A N O V I Ć 2 , Dmitar L A K U Š I Ć 2<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, P.O. Box 374, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

2 Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska<br />

43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Key words:<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus,<br />

Budoške bare,<br />

Montenegro,<br />

flora,<br />

distribution,<br />

ecology<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

Taxon Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. was found during<br />

the floristic investigations of wetlands of Budoške bare<br />

(reservoir Vrtac) locality in the vicinity of Nikšić, and it was<br />

the first confirmed record of the this plant species in<br />

Montenegro. Until now seven (sensu lato) or seventeen<br />

(sensu stricto) taxa of genus Edrianthus at the species and<br />

subspecies level has been found in Montenegro. Some<br />

suspicious literature data on presence of Edrianthus<br />

dalmaticus in Montenegro were cited in literature (Janchen<br />

1910, Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). In this paper we also<br />

presented the data about the characteristics of new locality,<br />

habitat and ecological preferences of Edrianthus dalmaticus<br />

A.DC. in Montengro.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus<br />

A.DC., Budoške bare,<br />

Crna Gora,<br />

flora,<br />

diverzitet,<br />

ekologija<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC.<br />

(CAMPANULACEAE) U CRNOJ GORI<br />

Tokom florističkih istraživanja na lokalitetu Budoške<br />

bare (akumulacija Vrtac) u okolini Nikšića pronađen je takson<br />

Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. čime je po prvi put zabilježeno i<br />

potvrđeno prisustvo ove biljne vrste u Crnoj Gori. Do sada je<br />

na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> zabilježeno prisustvo 7 (sensu lato)<br />

odnosno 17 taksona (sensu stricto) roda Edrianthus na nivou<br />

vrsta i podvrsta. U starijoj florističkoj literaturi za Crnu Goru<br />

se navode i neki sumnjivi podaci o prisustvu taksona<br />

Edrianthus dalmaticus A.DC. (Janchen 1910, Lakušić 1974,<br />

Hayek 1930, Rohlena 1942). U ovom radu dati su podaci o<br />

karakteristikama lokaliteta, staništa i ekologiji Edrianthus<br />

dalmaticusa A.DC. u Crnoj Gori.


20<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Genus Edraianthus DC. has its center of distribution in the Balkans and it<br />

represents one of the most prominent groups of endemic plants in this region.<br />

Additional disjunct parts of this group’s range are found in the Apennines, Sicily, and<br />

the Southern Carpathians.<br />

The widespread distribution of Edraianthus in the Balkans, and especially its<br />

high variability and differentiation along latitudinal and altitudinal range, defines it as<br />

one of the rare genera of the Balkan’s flora that was a subject of four monographs<br />

(W e t t s t e i n 1887, B e c k 1893, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974). In the last<br />

monograph and a couple of subsequent papers detailed systematic, phytogeographic<br />

and especially ecological investigations of this genus were provided and a new system<br />

of classification of edraianthoid campanulas was proposed (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987,<br />

1988). Additionally, the family Campanulaceae was segregated by L a k u š i ć (2001)<br />

into a new family, Edraianthaceae, while the genus Edraianthus itself into several new<br />

genera: Protoedraianthus, Visiania, Horvatia, Edraianthus, and Blecicia (Lakušić<br />

1987, 1988, 2001).<br />

According to different authors the genus comprises between 13 (J a n c h e n<br />

1910) and 45 taxa (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989) at the species and subspecies<br />

rank. The most significant recent floristic accounts, Flora Europaea (K u z m a n o v<br />

1976) and Med-Checklist (G r e u t e r et al. 1984), basically accept Janchen΄s concept,<br />

with restriction of number of species and subspecies within the genus between 10<br />

(K u z m a n o v 1976) and 14 (G r e u t e r et al. 1984).<br />

Genus Edraianthus has its center of distribution in the region of Montenegro with<br />

certainly recorded presence of 7 (sensu lato) that is 17 (sensu stricto) taxa at the<br />

species and subspecies rank (L a k u š i ć 1974, 1987, 1988, 1989). From widely<br />

comprehensible and generally accepted taxa on the territory of Montenegro these<br />

ones are present: E. tenuifolius (Waldst. & Kit.) A. DC., E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC.,<br />

E. tarae R. Lakušić, E. serpyllifolius (Vis.) A. DC., E. glisicii Černjavski & Soška,<br />

E. wettsteinii Haláscy & Baldaccii subsp. wettsteinii and E. wettsteinii subsp.<br />

lovcenicus E. Mayer & Blečić. Additionally, these subspecies are present on the<br />

territory of Montenegro E. glisicii subsp. majae R. Lakušić and E. serpyllifolius<br />

subsp. pilosulus (Beck) R. Lakušić, as well as taxa E. jugoslavicus R. Lakušić<br />

subsp. jugoslavicus, E. jugoslavicus subsp. subalpinus R. Lakušić, E. caricinus<br />

Schott, Nyman, & Kotschy, E. montenegrinus Horak, E. vesovicii R. Lakušić and E.<br />

zogovicii R. Lakušić which according to some authors belong to the widely accepted<br />

taxon E. graminifolius (L.) A. DC. sensu lato (J a n c h e n 1910, K u z m a n o v 1976,<br />

G r e u t e r et al. 1984). In order to avoid nomenclature confusion the concept of<br />

unique genus Edraianthus has been used in this supplement.<br />

Except of the aforesaid taxa in older floristic literature, some suspected data<br />

about the presence of the species E. dalmaticus A. DC in Montenegro are mentioned.<br />

The first information on the presence of this species in Montenegro was published by


21<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

J a n c h e n (1910: 8) which quotes the information from Reiser’s herbarium in<br />

Sarajevo Museum: “Zweifelhafte Standortangaben: Duga-Pässe in Montenegro<br />

(Reiser, H. Sarajev.)”, giving a commentary on these suspicious data. Lakušić in his<br />

monograph (1974: 17), cited probably the same herbarium specimen, for this species<br />

states “U Dugom polju (Reiser - Herb. SARA)”; However, he has correctly situated this<br />

locality not in Montenegro but in Dugo polje in Herzegovina. The data about the<br />

controversial presence of the species E. dalmaticus in Montenegro were mentioned<br />

by H a y e k (1930), R o h l e n a (1942) and L a k u š i ć (1974). Based on Janchen’s<br />

monograph, Hayek in his "Prodromus" states for this species “In rupibus subalpinis et<br />

alpinis. Da. BH. Mt?” (H a y e k 1930: 561). In addition, Rohlena refering to Baldacci’s<br />

data states ”In humidis silvat. Ad veterem typographiam pr. Rijeka (Ba). Sec. cl.<br />

Hayek dubius” (R o h l e n a 1942: 353). Lastly, a very interesting statement on general<br />

distribution of the species E. dalmaticus can be found in Lakušić’s monograph: ”...<br />

Additionally, there was interfering of materials from quite distant places in some<br />

herbarium sheets, which were probably compared and left in the same sheet, but they<br />

belong to different species, as it is the case with Reiser’s material, which refers to this<br />

species in the surrounding of Rijeka Crnojevića in Montenegro” (L a k u š i ć 1974: 18).<br />

During the recent field investigations and collecting material for floristic study of<br />

wet meadows in surrounding of Nikšić, E. dalmaticus was recorded and confirmed for<br />

the first time in Montenegro.<br />

RESULTS<br />

DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY<br />

The species E. dalmaticus was discovered in the locality Budoške bare<br />

(reservoir Vrtac) which is situated in the S.E. Montenegro that is in the south part of<br />

Nikšićko Polje (Fig. 1, 2). Budoške bare occupies the area of 13,42 km², on the<br />

altitude of 615 m.a.s.l.. To the west part of Budoške bare there is the reservoir Slano,<br />

to its north part it is Kapino polje, to the south there is mountain Budoš and to the east<br />

suburb Straševina. Waters which run through the channel from Slano reservoir and<br />

Krupac reservoir as well as from the Zeta River have the main role in the hidrography<br />

of this region. During the period of haevy precipitations, from October to the end of<br />

May, huge amounts of waters from the channel and the Zeta river form a temporary<br />

reservoir Vrtac which overflows the surrounding meadows. Budoške bare is influenced<br />

by sumediterranean climate. Limnoglacial sediments occupy a wide space in Budoške<br />

bare and they are represented with gravel, sand and clay. Deep, brown, clay-loamy,<br />

lessivage meaedow soils and terrains are dominant in this region.


22<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Fig 1. Herbarium specimen of E. dalmaticus A.DC. – coll. Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare<br />

(42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows, 615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU).


23<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

Voucher specimens:<br />

- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />

615 m (Bubanja, N., 14.6.2006, Seed plants collection Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro)<br />

- Montenegro, Nikšić, Budoške bare (42º45.214 N, 18º53.163 E), wet meadows,<br />

615 m (Bubanja, N. 26560, 14.6.2006, BEOU)<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus is endemic species (Fig. 2) distributed in Croatia<br />

(Dalmatia - Drniš, Dolac, Klis, Mosor, Povilo, Promina, Solin, Knin, Vrlika, Muć),<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina (Duvanjsko polje, Glamočko polje, Livanjsko polje, Drvar-<br />

Drobnjak, Dugo polje, Čaprazlije, Donje Bare, Lištica – Posušje, Podklečani)<br />

(B j e l č i ć , M a y e r 1983, J a n c h e n 1910, L a k u š i ć 1974, Flora Croatica<br />

Database 2004) and Montenegro (Budoške bare near Nikšić). It could be designated<br />

as dinaric floristic element of adriatic submediterranean province.<br />

Fig. 2. Distribution of<br />

Edraianthus dalmaticus (UTM<br />

Grid zone 34; spot correspond<br />

with basic square10 x 10 km).<br />

Arrow indicate new locality in<br />

Montenegro. ? indicate<br />

suspicious literature data on<br />

presence of E. dalmaticus in<br />

the surrounding of Rijeka<br />

Crnojevića in Montenegro<br />

(Abbreviation: Cro – Croatia,<br />

BH – Bosnia and Herzegovina,<br />

Mtg – Montenegro)


24<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

THREAT<br />

According to its endemic distribution, as well as the fact that species inhabits<br />

very fragile periodically flooded karst meadows, it is as a Rare (R) species included in<br />

Global IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants (W a l t e r , G i l l e t t 1998). Also as<br />

European endemics (species for which the total (global) distribution is restricted to<br />

Europe), as well as species included in Global IUCN Red lists, E. dlamaticus is<br />

defined as “target species” or “species of European importance” (O z i n g a ,<br />

S c h a m i n é e 2005).<br />

In addition, E. dalmaticus is defined as highly protected species in Croatia<br />

(Anonymus 2006), as well as in the category DD - data deficient included into Croatian<br />

Red Book (N i k o l i ć , Topić , 2005), while according to Š i l i ć (1996) it has the<br />

status of vulnerable (V) threatened species in Bosnia and Herzegovina.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ANONYMUS 2006: Pravilnik o proglašavanju divljih svojti zaštićenim i strogo<br />

zaštićenim (16. 1. 2006.), Narodne novine (7), Zagreb.<br />

BECK G. 1893: Die Gattung Hedraeanthus. - Wiener Illustrierte Garten-Zeitung 18:<br />

287-299.<br />

BJELČIĆ, Ž., MAYER, E. 1983: Edraianthus A. DC. - In: Bjelčić, Ž. (ed.), Flora Bosnae<br />

et Hercegovinae. IV Simpetalae. Pars 4: 54-56, Sarajevo, Štamparija Trebinje<br />

188 pp.<br />

Flora Croatica Database 2004: - Botanički zavod, PMF, Sveučilište u Zagrebu,<br />

http://hirc.botanic.hr<br />

GREUTER W. and T. RAUS. 1983: Med-Checklist Notulae, 8. - Willdenovia 13: 277-<br />

288.<br />

HAYEK A. 1930: Prodromus Florae peninsulae Balcanicae 2. Repertorium Speciorum<br />

novarum Regni vegetabilis, Beihefte 30(2): 337-576.<br />

JANCHEN E. 1910: Edraianthus-Arten der Balkanländer. - Mitteilungen des<br />

Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines an der Universität Wien 8: 1-40.<br />

KUZMANOV B. 1976: Edraianthus A. DC. Pp. 99-100 in Flora Europea. Vol. 4,<br />

Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae), eds. Tutin T. G., V. H.<br />

Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A.<br />

Webb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

LAKUŠIĆ R. 1974: Prirodni sistem populacija vrsta roda Edraianthus DC. Godišnjak<br />

Biološkog Instituta u Sarajevu 26: 1-129.<br />

LAKUŠIĆ R. 2001: Phytodiversity of the Order Campanulales Juss. in Montenegro.<br />

Pp. 70 in Prirodni potencijali kopna, kontinentalnih voda i mora <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> i<br />

njihova zaštita. Plenarni referati i izvodi iz saopštenja sa naučnog skupa,<br />

Žabljak 20 -23. 9. 2001. Book of Abstracts, ed. Regner S. Podgorica: Institut za


25<br />

Bubanja, Stevanović, Lakušić: EDRAIANTHUS DALMATICUS A.DC. (CAMPANULACEAE)<br />

biologiju mora Kotor & Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong> -<br />

Podgorica.<br />

LOVRIĆ A. Š., RAC, M. 1987: Doprinos fitogeografiji Svilaje i njezina povezanot sa<br />

Biokovom. Acta Biokovica 4: 189-204.<br />

NIKOLIĆ, T., TOPIĆ, J. eds. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Hrvatske. -<br />

Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb. 693pp.<br />

OZINGA, W.A. & SCHAMINÉE, J.H.J. (eds.). 2005: Target Species – Species of<br />

European Concern. A database driven selection of plant and animal species for<br />

the implementation of the Pan European Ecological Network. Wageningen,<br />

Alterra, Alterra-report 1119. 193 pages; 30 figs.; 18 tables; 134 refs.<br />

ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae. - Preslia 20-21: 1-506.<br />

ŠILIĆ, Č. 1996: Spisak biljnih vrsta (Pteridophyta i Spermatophyta) za Crvenu knjigu<br />

Bosna i Hercegovine - Glasnik Zemaljskog <strong>muzej</strong>a Bosne i Hercegovine<br />

(Prirodne nauke), Nov. ser. 31: 323-367.<br />

WALTER, K.S. & H.J. GILLETT (eds.) (1998) 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened<br />

Plants. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre. IUCN - The<br />

World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.<br />

WETTSTEIN R. 1887: Monographie der Gattung Hedraeanthus. Denkschr. kais. Akad.<br />

Wissensch. math.-natur. Classe 53: 185-212.<br />

Received: 27. 11. 2007.


26<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 27-30<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl., NEW TAXON IN<br />

FLORA OF MONTENEGRO<br />

Nada BUBANJA¹, Snežana VUKSANOVIĆ ¹<br />

¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Nikšićka Župa,<br />

Montenegro,<br />

taxon<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

During the floristic researches of Niksicka Zupa, a<br />

taxon Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />

Br.- Bl. was found and it was the first time to find this taxon<br />

in Montenegrin flora. The flora of Europe connects the<br />

species Onosma tridentina Wettst. to Italy, but it suspects<br />

that it might have spread out on the territory of ex-<br />

Yugoslavia. Med-Check list, as well as the Flora of Europe,<br />

suspects that this taxon can be found on the territory of ex-<br />

Yugoslavia. In the electronic database of Croatian flora one<br />

can find this taxon under the name Onosma pseudoarenaria<br />

ssp.tridentina (highly protected species), and in that way its<br />

presence has been confirmed on the territory of Croatia. By<br />

this finding the presence of Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />

ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl. on the territory of Montenegro<br />

has been confirmed and it represents the second finding of<br />

this taxon on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Nikšićka Župa,<br />

Crna Gora,<br />

takson<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.-<br />

Bl., NOVI TAKSON U FLORI CRNE GORE<br />

Tokom florističkih istraživanja Nikšićke Župe pronađen<br />

je takson Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.)<br />

Br.- Bl. što je prvi nalaz ovog taksona u flori <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Flora<br />

Evrope vrstu Onosma tridentina Wettst. navodi za Italiju, pri<br />

čemu izražava sumnju u njeno rasprostranjenje na teritoriji<br />

bivše Jugoslavije. Med-Check lista kao i Flora Evrope sumnja<br />

u nalaz ovog taksona na području bivše Jugoslavije. U<br />

elektronskoj bazi podataka flore Hrvatske naveden je ovaj<br />

takson kao Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (strogo<br />

zaštićena biljka) čime je potvrđeno njeno prisustvo na<br />

teritoriji Hrvatske. Ovim nalazom potvrđeno je prisustvo<br />

Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina na teritoriji <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong><br />

što je ujedno I drugi nalaz ovog taksona za prostor bivše<br />

Jugoslavije.


28<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Nikšićka Župa is situated in the south-west part of Montenegro. It occupies the<br />

area of 40 km 2 , and with its broader mountain hinterland and brim 210 km 2 . A diversity<br />

of flora and vegetation of this region is caused by the influence of Mediterranean and<br />

continental climate as well as high mountains (Maganik, Stitovo and Prekornica) which<br />

surround Nikšićka Župa. Nikšićka Župa is situated east of Nikšić.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa were carried out in period August, 2000 to<br />

September 2003. The subspecies represented in this paper was collected in June<br />

2002, and the vouchers are entrusted to the collection of Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro. The basic literature used for determination of this taxon was: Flora<br />

Europea (L.1972) and Med-Check list (G r e u t e r , B u r d e t & L o n g 1984).<br />

Photographs of the species (fig.1) and habitation (fig.2) where the plant was collected<br />

from are given in this paper .<br />

Fig.1: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur.<br />

ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl.


29<br />

Bubanja, Vuksanović: Onosma pseudoarenaria Schur. ssp. tridentina (Wettst.) . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

During the floristic researches of Nikšićka Župa, a subspecies Onosma<br />

pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- Bl was found. That is the first finding of<br />

this taxon in Montenegro. A small population was recorded on only one locality<br />

(Preserve of King Nikola-Morakovske bare). The plant grows in open, dry and rocky<br />

habitation in beech forest. Genus Onosma L. is represented with 33 species in Flora<br />

of Europe. According to the existing data, these species have been registered on the<br />

territory of Montenegro: O. stellulatum W.K., O. Aucherianum DC. ssp. Javorkae<br />

(SIMK.) HAY., O. arenarium W.K. and O. Visianii CLEM (R o h l e n a 1942).<br />

H a y e k (1924-1933) did not record the presence of this species on the Balkan<br />

Peninsula. Flora Europea as well as Med-Check List mentions this subspecies only for<br />

Italy, doubting upon its spreading on the territory of ex-Yugoslavia. This subspecies<br />

was not recorded in the regional flora of Croatia (D o m a c 1994), whereas in<br />

electronic database of Croatian flora it is recorded as a highly protected species.<br />

Fig.2: Habitation where the plant was collected from.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

A finding of Onosma pseudoarenaria ssp.tridentina (Wettst.) Br.- BL. in<br />

Nikšićka Župa clearly confirm its presence in the Balkan Peninsula. In relation to Flora<br />

Europae and Med Check List this record significantly extends the subspecies range<br />

towards the south-east.


30<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

BUBANJA, N. 2004: Flora vlažnih i vodenih staništa Nikšićke Župe. Specijalistički<br />

rad.Biološki fakultet,Beograd (manuscr.), 86pp.<br />

GREUTER W., BURDET H. M., LONG G., 1984: Med-Check List. Vol. 1., Geneve &<br />

Berlin, 109-110<br />

PIGNATTI S. 1982: Flora d' Italia 2. - Edagricole, 400-402.<br />

PULEVIĆ, V. 2005: Građa za vaskularnu floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Dopuna "Conspectus florae<br />

montenegrinae" J. Rohlene., knjiga 2, Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode <strong>Crne</strong><br />

<strong>Gore</strong>, Podgorica, 218pp.<br />

ROHLENA, J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrine. -Presila (Praha) 20-21: 254pp.<br />

TUTIN, T.G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V. H.,<br />

MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A., 1993:<br />

Flora Europaea. Vol. 3. - Cambridge, 89-94.<br />

Received: 27. 11. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6: 31-52<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY AND<br />

SEX EXPRESSION IN Acer monspessulanum L. FROM MONTENEGRO<br />

Rajko T R I P I Ć 1)<br />

1)<br />

Republic Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, Podgorica, Trg vojvode Bećir<br />

bega Osmanagića 16, Podgorica, Crna Gora<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Flowering phenology,<br />

sex expression,<br />

Acer monspessulanum<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The paper contains results of research of flowering<br />

phenology and sex expression of flowers, inflorescences and<br />

individual trees of Acer monspessulanum consecutively for<br />

seven years on 40 marked trees from 2 local populations<br />

near Nikšić. The flowers were morphologically false<br />

bisexually and functionally unisexual (male or female). The<br />

male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil (unfunctional)<br />

with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional<br />

anthers on long filaments). The female flowers had normally<br />

developed pistil and unripe stamens (the anthers are green,<br />

hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short).<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Fenologija cvjetanja,<br />

polna ekspresija,<br />

Acer monspessulanum<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU FENOLOGIJE CVJETANJA I<br />

POLNE EKSPRESIJE U ACER MONSPESSULANUM L. IZ<br />

CRNE GORE<br />

U radu su dati rezultati istraživanja fenologije cvjetanja<br />

i polne ekspresije cvjetova, cvati i individualnih stabala Acer<br />

monspessulanum uzastopnotokom sedam godina na 40<br />

markiranih stabala iz dvije lokalne populacije blizu Nikšića.<br />

Cvjetovi su bili morfološki lažno dvopolni a funkcionalno<br />

jednopolni (muški ili ženski). Muški cvjetovi su imali vrlo mali,<br />

rudimentarni tučak (nefunkcionalan) sa normalno razvijenim<br />

prašnicima (žuti sa funkcionalnim anterama na dugačkim<br />

filamentima), a ženski cvjetovi su imali dobro razvijen tučak i<br />

nezrele prašnike (sa zelenim, tvrdim i nefunkcionalnim<br />

anterama na vrlo kratkim filamentima).


32<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Morphological and functional variations in the sexuality of Acer flowers were<br />

studied by many explorers. P a x (1885), monographer of Acer genus, said that flowers<br />

of Acer monspessulanum are andro-monoecious. P o j a r k o v a (1933), also<br />

monographer of Acer genus said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male and false<br />

bisexual. Z a m j a t n i n (1958) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are male with<br />

stamens and female with pistil and reduced stamens. G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i<br />

(1978) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are functionally unisexual independently<br />

from development of sexual organs of the opposite sex. Male flowers do not have pistil,<br />

and if there is pistil it is reduced and sterile. Female flowers have well-developed<br />

stamens but their anthers do not grow-up, half-anthers do not open and they produce<br />

sterile pollen. P a l a m a r e v (1979) said that flowers of A. monspessulanum are<br />

bisexual and unisexual.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Flowering phenology and sexual expression of flowers, inflorescences and trees<br />

of Acer monspessulanum were observed consecutively in period of 7 years on marked<br />

trees (40 trees) in 2 local populations (SUBICA and GREBICE) near NIKŠIĆ. Sexuality<br />

of the flowers was determined on base of their sexual organs functionality. During full<br />

anthesis of the flowers all flowers had normally developed stamens and non-welldeveloped<br />

pistils (rudimentary or abortive pistil) are considered to be male. Criteria for<br />

female flowers is incompetence for releasing pollen, and in case of releasing pollen<br />

such flowers are considered to be bisexual. The criteria for a female flower will be the<br />

inability to release pollen. In case of pollen release, fertile or not, the flowers will be<br />

considered as bisexual. Such the opinion represents contemporary monographer of<br />

Acer genus J o n g (1976). The sexual expression of the inflorescences is determined<br />

on base of classification of inflorescences according to type of their flowering (W i t t r o<br />

c k 1886; modified by C o r r e n s 1928; taken from J o n g 1976) and numeral<br />

relationships between male and female flowers in the inflorescences is observed in<br />

specimen of 30 randomly taken inflorescences for every individual tree and every<br />

specific year of observation. Phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and<br />

flowering were determined according to recommendations (B e j d e m a n 1979).


33<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

All analysed trees were monoecious plants. The male and female flowers are both<br />

placed on the same inflorescence. The male flowers had very small, rudimentary pistil<br />

(unfunctional) with normally developed stamens (yellow with functional anthers on long<br />

filaments). The female flowers had normally developed pistil and unripe stamens (the<br />

anthers are green, hard and unfunctional, and filaments are very short). We find similar<br />

results with G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978). T r i p i ć (2006) presented very<br />

similar results for Acer obtusatum Waldst. & Kit.. It is observed, but very rarely (on 5<br />

trees), that during the flowering 1-2 almost normally developed female flowers were<br />

transformed into functionally male flowers with illusory normal pistil but with abortive<br />

ovary. Such flowers are morphological illusory bisexual but in fact they are functionally<br />

unisexual male flowers.<br />

Phenophase of flowering in observed populations begins in time interval from 9 th<br />

March to 14 th April (Stubica) and 25 th March to 13 th April (Grebice) and lasts from 8 to 49<br />

days in population (Stubica) and 27 to 47 days (Grebice), depending on weather<br />

(especially temperature), number of flowering trees and volume of flowering of each<br />

tree (Tab. 2., 3. and Graph. 2., 4.). The end of flowering varied from 8 th April to 5 th May<br />

(Stubica) and 4 th May to 18 th May (Grebice). Massive and rich flowering of trees in this<br />

populations was every the third year (Tab. 2. and Graph. 2., 4.) followed with 2 years of<br />

weak or very little flowering (small number of flowering trees and often very small<br />

number of flowering inflorescences and flowers). The annual flowering rhythmic is very<br />

similar in observed populations while the rhythmic between observed trees was<br />

significantly differentiated (Table 2. and Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.). Individual tree flowered<br />

depending on ecological conditions and richness of flowering from 3 to 28 days (<br />

Stubica) and 2 to 29 days (Grebice) and all analysed trees of observed populations<br />

depending also of ecological conditions, number of flowered trees and volume of<br />

flowering of every tree lasted from 8 to 49 days (Tab. 2., Graph. 1., 2.,3.,4.). Also, for<br />

individual trees it is determined that there is greater or lower variation of duration of<br />

flowering in observed years, depending on ecological conditions and volume of<br />

flowering of that tree (when volume of flowering is low when number of flowering<br />

inflorescences on tree is small than phenophases of such trees starts later and lasts<br />

significantly shorter, and their inflorescences have smaller number of flowering types,<br />

so the tree has at that time narrower sexual expression than in years of rich flowering<br />

(Graph. 1., 2., 3., 4.).


34<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 1. The phenophases: Swelling of the buds and opening of the buds in observed<br />

populations of Acer monspessulanum L.<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Swelling of the buds<br />

Opening of the buds<br />

Start Massive Start Massive<br />

STUBICA<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

18. 2. – 6. 4.<br />

9.3. – 17. 4.<br />

30. 3. – 19. 4.<br />

14. 2. – 18. 3.<br />

16. 3. – 15. 4.<br />

27. 2. – 18. 4.<br />

21. 2. – 1. 4.<br />

1. 3. – 19. 4.<br />

16. 3. – 22. 4.<br />

15. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

11. 3. – 29. 3.<br />

6. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

16. 3. – 30. 4.<br />

13. 3. - 8. 4.<br />

3. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

24. 3. – 24. 3.<br />

11. 4. – 24. 4.<br />

15. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

26. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

26. 3. – 30. 4.<br />

19. 3. – 6. 4.<br />

12. 3. – 27. 4.<br />

29. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

19. 4. – 29. 4.<br />

19. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

13. 4. – 28. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 3. 5.<br />

23. 3. – 11. 4.<br />

GREBICE<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

6. 3. – 24. 4.<br />

25. 3. – 26. 4.<br />

2. 4. – 21. 4.<br />

18. 2. – 31. 3.<br />

10. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

6.3.(21.1.)– 22.4.<br />

28. 2. – 29. 3.<br />

20. 3. – 28. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 29. 4.<br />

19. 4. – 30. 4.<br />

11. 3. – 7. 4.<br />

28. 3. – 28. 4.<br />

29. 3. – 2. 5.<br />

20. 3. – 10. 4.<br />

3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

3. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

10. 4. – 28. 4.<br />

18. 3. – 8. 4.<br />

27. 3. – 27. 4.<br />

8.4.(28.1.)- 28.4.<br />

28. 3. – 11. 4.<br />

7. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

8. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

21. 4. – 3. 5.<br />

25. 3. – 18. 4.<br />

6. 4. – 2. 5.<br />

14. 4. – 5. 5.<br />

30. 3. – 17. 4.<br />

All male flowers of individual trees flowered at lest 2 days and at most 22 days,<br />

and female flowering at least 1 day and at most 11 days (Tab. 3., Graph. 2., 4.). It is<br />

determined that phenophases of flowering of male flowers at all protandrous trees and<br />

at most of protogynous trees it is significantly longer from phenophases of flowering of<br />

female flowers, while such phases at only several protogynous trees has similar period<br />

of lasting or it is phenophases of flowering of female flowers were longer from<br />

phenophases of flowering of male flowers (Graph. 2., 4.). T r i p i ć (2006) presented<br />

very similar results for A. obtusatum while results for A campestre and A. platanoides<br />

(in press) he presented that they had good and very good flowering intensity<br />

consequently for several years followed with one or two years of weak and very weak<br />

flowering. That shows that species which taxonomically belong to the same section<br />

have very similar phenology of flowering while the phenology of flowering to the species<br />

from different sections is different.


35<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

Table 2. The phenophase of flowering in the observed populations of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L.<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Flowering of the individual trees<br />

Flowering of the observed population<br />

Start Massive The end Start Massive The end<br />

STUBICA 1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003<br />

2004.<br />

9. 3.– 14. 4.<br />

30. 3.–18. 4.<br />

14. 4.–20. 4.<br />

19. 3.–10. 4.<br />

1. 4. – 1. 4.<br />

1. 4. –18. 4.<br />

24. 3. – 9. 4.<br />

14. 3.–16. 4.<br />

1. 4. –10. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

21. 3. – 1. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - -<br />

4. 4. –17. 4.<br />

27. 3. – 8. 4.<br />

5. 4. – 26. 4.<br />

8. 4. – 24. 4.<br />

16. 4.–22. 4.<br />

4. 4. – 20. 4.<br />

7. 4. – 8. 4.<br />

20. 4.– 5. 5.<br />

9. 4. – 23. 4.<br />

9. 3.<br />

30. 3.<br />

14. 4.<br />

19. 3.<br />

1. 4.<br />

1. 4.<br />

24. 3.<br />

30. 3.-13. 4.*<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

24. 3. – 13. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

1. 4. – 17. 4.<br />

26. 4.<br />

24. 4.<br />

22. 4.<br />

20. 4.<br />

8. 4.<br />

5. 5.<br />

23. 4.<br />

GREBICE 1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

4. 4. –25. 4.<br />

6. 4. –27. 4.<br />

13. 4.–28. 4.<br />

25. 3.–19. 4.<br />

2. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

13. 4. – 1. 5.<br />

3. 4. –16. 4.<br />

8. 4. –20. 4.<br />

9. 4. –30. 4.<br />

16. 4.–27. 4.<br />

28. 3.–12. 4.<br />

4. 5. – 4. 5.<br />

16. 4.–28. 4.<br />

6. 4. –18. 4.<br />

14. 4. - 5. 5.<br />

15. 4. – 9. 5.<br />

27. 4.–14. 5.<br />

13. 4. – 5. 5.<br />

19. 4.–18. 5.<br />

22. 4. – 9. 5.<br />

16. 4. – 4. 5.<br />

4. 4.<br />

6. 4.<br />

13. 4.<br />

25. 3.<br />

2. 4.<br />

13. 4.<br />

3. 4.<br />

14. 4.–27. 4.*<br />

14. 4.– 2. 5.*<br />

21. 4.– 3. 5.*<br />

1. 4. – 21. 4.<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

- - - - - - - - -<br />

5. 4. – 25. 4.<br />

5. 5.<br />

9. 5.<br />

14. 5.<br />

5. 5.<br />

18. 5.<br />

9. 5.<br />

4. 5.<br />

Legend: * = semimassive; - - - - = non-flowering<br />

Table 3. The duration of flowering of the observed individual trees and populations of<br />

Acer monspessulanum L. (in days).<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

The individual tree<br />

Population<br />

All ♂ flowers All ♀ flowers All flowers The observed tree (Total)<br />

STUBICA<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

3 – 22<br />

4 – 21<br />

2 – 5<br />

2 – 19<br />

3 – 3<br />

4 – 19<br />

6 – 15<br />

2 – 10<br />

1 – 11<br />

1 – 3<br />

2 – 8<br />

3 – 3<br />

1 – 9<br />

2 – 7<br />

6 – 28<br />

5 – 23<br />

3 – 7<br />

3 – 26<br />

7 – 8<br />

8 – 26<br />

12 - 22<br />

49<br />

26<br />

11<br />

33<br />

8<br />

35<br />

31<br />

GREBICE<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

2 – 18<br />

2 – 20<br />

4 – 17<br />

9 – 24<br />

2 – 14<br />

3 – 11<br />

6 – 18<br />

1 – 9<br />

1 – 8<br />

1 – 7<br />

2 – 14<br />

2 – 5<br />

1 – 8<br />

1 – 10<br />

6 – 28<br />

3 – 29<br />

6 – 23<br />

14 – 28<br />

2 – 20<br />

5 – 22<br />

11 – 25<br />

32<br />

34<br />

32<br />

42<br />

47<br />

27<br />

32


36<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 4. Level of flowering (number of flowers on tree) of individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. during a year<br />

Population<br />

Year<br />

Level of flowering<br />

N Non-flowering Very low Low Medium High Very high<br />

1998.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

3<br />

4<br />

2<br />

4<br />

6<br />

1999.<br />

20<br />

10<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

3<br />

1<br />

STUBICA<br />

2000.<br />

20<br />

11<br />

6<br />

3<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2001.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

1<br />

1<br />

-<br />

5<br />

13<br />

2002.<br />

20<br />

18<br />

2<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2003.<br />

20<br />

2<br />

6<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

8<br />

2004.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

8<br />

9<br />

1998.<br />

20<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3<br />

-<br />

5<br />

6<br />

1999.<br />

20<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

-<br />

7<br />

5<br />

2000.<br />

20<br />

7<br />

1<br />

-<br />

1<br />

4<br />

7<br />

GREBICE<br />

2001.<br />

20<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

11<br />

9<br />

2002.<br />

20<br />

13<br />

4<br />

1<br />

-<br />

2<br />

-<br />

2003.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

8<br />

2<br />

9<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2004.<br />

20<br />

1<br />

4<br />

7<br />

8<br />

Total number of flowers on single inflorescences varied from 3 – 28 (0 – 12 of the<br />

female and 0 – 24 of the male flowers) (Table 5., 6.) . The inflorescences with only<br />

female flowers were very rare (it were found only 2 of such inflorescences), while<br />

inflorescences with only male flowers were very frequent on all trees. Quantitative<br />

relationship of the male and female flowers on the single tree was from 50 %: 50 % (1<br />

tree) to 99.9 % of the male flowers (6 trees) (Table 5., 6.).


37<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

Table 5. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Tree<br />

Year<br />

Male flowers Female flowers All flowers in an<br />

inflorescence<br />

Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently<br />

% of ♂<br />

flowers<br />

on tree<br />

1998. 3 16 7 , 8 0 6 1 , 2 5 16 11 , 9 81.0<br />

1 2001. 4 14 8 0 6 2 , 1 6 15 10 84.3<br />

2004. 5 14 7 , 6 0 9 1 , 0 5 18 10 80.0<br />

1998. 6 14 9 0 2 0 6 14 14 , 13 96.3<br />

2 1999. 6 16 9 , 8 0 5 0 , 1 6 16 9 , 10 93.3<br />

2001. 6 13 8 , 7 0 4 0 6 14 8 94.7<br />

2004. 5 14 9 , 8 1 6 0 , 2 6 18 10 , 12 88.9<br />

1998. 4 11 6 , 7 0 6 4 , 5 6 15 8 , 9 70.8<br />

3 2001. 4 13 9 , 12 0 5 4 , 5 5 17 14 , 15 79.6<br />

2004. 6 14 9 , 10 1 7 5 7 20 14 66.7<br />

4 2001. 4 11 7 , 8 0 9 3 , 2 6 18 10 , 11 71.7<br />

2004. 5 13 9 , 7 1 7 3 , 6 8 17 12 66.8<br />

5 2001. 4 13 8 , 6 1 5 1 , 3 6 16 7 , 9 85.1<br />

2004. 3 12 7 , 8 1 7 3 6 17 9 , 7 63.7<br />

6 2004. 4 10 7 1 7 4 6 17 8 , 12 60.2<br />

7 2001. 3 10 6 , 5 1 5 1 , 3 6 15 8 , 9 62.9<br />

2004. 2 7 5 1 6 1 , 5 5 13 7 , 6 63.8<br />

8 2001. 6 16 9 , 13 0 1 0 6 16 9 , 13 99.9<br />

2004. 7 18 12 , 10 0 1 0 7 18 12 , 10 99.99<br />

9 2001. 4 13 6 , 7 0 2 0 4 13 6 , 7 97.3<br />

2004. 4 13 6 0 5 0 5 15 6 92.5<br />

1998. 2 10 5 , 7 0 5 3 , 1 4 14 6 , 9 69.1<br />

10 2001. 3 10 6 , 4 0 6 3 5 13 9 , 7 65.8<br />

2004. 3 10 7 , 6 1 6 4 , 5 6 15 9 , 11 64.1<br />

1998. 5 17 11 , 10 0 2 0 5 17 11 , 10 99.9<br />

11 1999. 6 14 10 , 11 0 4 0 6 14 11 , 10 99.9<br />

2001. 5 14 7 0 3 0 5 14 7 99.99<br />

2004. 5 17 13 , 9 0 3 0 5 17 13 , 9 99.99<br />

1999. 4 15 8 , 11 0 3 0 4 15 8 , 11 99.9<br />

12 2001. 5 14 7 , 6 0 5 0 5 15 7 99.2<br />

2004. 5 21 8 , 11 0 5 0 5 21 8 , 11 99.7<br />

1998. 3 16 9 0 7 5 , 4 8 22 14 , 12 67.6<br />

13 2001. 2 17 9 1 7 5 , 4 7 23 15 , 7 63.8<br />

2004. 6 16 8 , 14 1 7 4 , 6 11 21 14 , 16 72.9<br />

14 2001. 5 14 7 0 2 0 6 14 7 , 8 94.0<br />

1998. 2 8 5 , 3 1 5 2 , 4 4 13 7 , 8 60.4<br />

15 1999. 2 7 3 1 7 1 , 2 4 10 5 , 6 54.6<br />

2001. 2 8 4 , 5 1 5 3 5 12 7 , 8 58.7<br />

2004. 4 10 6 , 7 1 7 5 , 7 5 16 14 58.4<br />

16 2001. 5 15 8 , 9 0 3 0 5 16 8 , 9 90.0<br />

2004. 6 18 10 , 11 0 5 0 7 18 10 , 14 99.3<br />

1998. 3 11 7 0 2 0 4 12 8 99.9<br />

17 2001. 3 12 7 0 3 0 5 13 7 , 8 99.5<br />

2004. 4 15 7 , 10 0 2 0 4 15 7 , 10 99.4<br />

18 2001. 4 12 6 1 5 3 5 14 7 , 10 63.3<br />

2004. 5 14 8 , 9 0 7 5 , 1 8 19 11 , 15 69.2<br />

19 2001. 3 20 5 , 6 0 3 0 4 22 6 , 5 99.99<br />

2004. 6 14 8 , 10 0 4 0 6 14 8 , 10 99.99<br />

1998. 0 14 7 0 5 3 , 2 4 17 9 , 8 69.7<br />

20 2001. 1 10 3 , 4 1 5 5 , 4 5 14 8 , 7 49.4<br />

2004. 4 12 8 1 7 5 , 3 6 18 13 , 12 58.7


38<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Tab. 6. Frequent of number of flowers in the individual inflorescences in Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Tree Year<br />

Male flowers Female flowers Total of number flowers<br />

in inflorescences<br />

% of ♂<br />

flowers<br />

Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently Min. Max. Frequently on tree<br />

1999. 4 13 5 and 7 1 7 5 and 3 6 18 11 and 12 66.0<br />

1 2000. 2 15 8 and 9 1 7 3 and 5 5 19 11 and 13 72.4<br />

2001. 3 22 8 and 7 0 7 5 and 3 5 28 12 and 13 69.5<br />

2002. 5 17 8 and 10 0 5 1 and 2 6 19 11 and 10 81.7<br />

2004. 4 15 6 and 11 0 7 5 and 1 5 20 15 70.3<br />

1999. 4 11 7 and 6 1 5 1 and 3 6 14 10 and 7 74.5<br />

2 2001. 4 12 7 0 5 3 5 16 10 75.0<br />

2004. 4 11 6 0 5 2 and 3 7 15 9 69.0<br />

2000. 4 15 9 and 10 1 7 5 and 4 7 18 14 and 12 68.1<br />

3 2001. 3 10 6 and 7 1 6 1 and 4 5 15 9 69.9<br />

2004. 6 15 8 and 12 1 6 2 and 1 7 21 15 and 10 77.7<br />

4 2001. 5 13 6 and 5 0 2 0 5 13 6 and 5 99.99<br />

2004. 6 16 9 and 7 0 1 0 6 16 9 and 7 99.99<br />

2004. 3 8 6 1 5 2 6 14 9 68.5<br />

5 2001. 2 10 4 and 5 1 5 4 and 5 5 14 6 and 8 58.6<br />

2004. 4 10 6 1 5 5 and 3 7 14 11 64.9<br />

1999. 4 12 7 1 6 5 6 17 11 66.0<br />

6 2001. 5 12 7 1 6 3 and 4 7 16 11 and 14 69.0<br />

2004. 4 12 7 and 8 0 5 2 and 0 5 15 8 and 12 77.6<br />

1999. 6 13 8 and 9 0 9 4 and 2 7 19 14 and 12 59.2<br />

7 2001. 6 10 8 and 9 1 8 2 and 5 8 17 13 and 11 68.9<br />

2004. 5 10 7 and 9 0 12 3 and 4 5 20 10 and 13 60.9<br />

2000. 8 22 11 1 5 2 and 4 10 25 13 and 17 81.6<br />

8 2001. 8 20 15 0 7 1 and 4 9 23 18 85.2<br />

2004. 7 24 16 0 6 1 and 3 8 25 18 85.9<br />

1999. 4 16 8 and 10 1 6 1 and 3 5 17 9 78.7<br />

9 2000. 5 13 8 and 9 1 5 2 and 3 7 17 12 and 14 75.6<br />

2001. 3 12 7 and 9 1 5 3 6 16 10 and 11 73.1<br />

10 2001. 6 19 8 0 3 0 8 19 8 and 11 91.1<br />

2004. 7 21 12 0 3 0 7 22 13 and 14 92.7<br />

11 2001. 4 11 7 0 3 0 4 11 7 99.5<br />

2004. 5 11 7 and 8 0 1 0 5 11 7 and 8 99.99<br />

12 2001. 4 14 9 and 6 1 6 4 and 3 7 18 12 and 10 72.0<br />

2004. 5 16 11 1 7 4 and 5 7 21 14 69.9<br />

13 2000. 3 13 7 and 6 1 6 3 and 5 6 18 10 and 12 66.8<br />

2004. 4 12 6 and 8 1 7 1 and 5 5 17 7 and 12 66.3<br />

14 2001. 3 11 6 and 5 0 3 0 3 11 5 and 7 94.1<br />

2004. 5 10 7 0 4 0 and 1 5 13 5 and 8 87.3<br />

2001. 5 17 10 0 6 1 and 2 6 19 13 and 11 78.6<br />

15 2004. 6 20 11 and 7 0 7 1 7 21 13 85.9<br />

1999. 5 13 6 and 8 1 4 1 and 2 6 14 7 and 9 83.7<br />

16 2000. 3 17 12 and 9 1 7 3 and 6 6 20 12 and 16 68.7<br />

2004. 5 21 6 and 14 1 7 1 and 2 6 22 7 and 16 87.8<br />

17 2001. 7 17 12 and 9 0 6 0 and 4 7 17 12 84.7<br />

2004. 7 16 10 0 5 2 and 0 11 18 12 and 14 82.4<br />

1999. 0 15 7 and 10 0 8 0 and 5 6 16 10 and 11 92.4<br />

18 2001. 7 16 11 and 9 0 7 0 and 1 8 17 92.6<br />

2004. 6 18 9 and 11 0 7 1 and 2 7 18 16 and 11 82.8<br />

19<br />

2001. 4 11 6 and 7 1 5 1 and 3 5 15 7 and 10 74.4<br />

2004. 5 12 7 and 11 0 5 1 and 0 7 16 8 and 7 89.0<br />

20 1999. 4 11 7 and 9 0 6 0 and 1 6 16 10 and 8 81.4<br />

2000. 5 12 6 and 8 0 5 0 and 2 6 17 8 and 13 85.6


39<br />

Graph. 1. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the individual<br />

trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6


40<br />

Graph. 1.<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16


41<br />

Year<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Graph . 1.<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

2004<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20<br />

o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the flowering


42<br />

Graph. 2. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Stubica)<br />

Year<br />

1998.<br />

1999.<br />

2000.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8 Non flowered<br />

9 Non flowered<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16 Non flowered<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 4 – 7 Non flowered


43<br />

Graph. 2.<br />

Year<br />

2000.<br />

2001.<br />

2002.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16 Non flowered<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1 Non flowered<br />

2 Non flowered<br />

3 Non flowered<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8 Non flowered<br />

9 Non flowered<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13 Non flowered<br />

14


44<br />

Year<br />

2002.<br />

2003.<br />

2004.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

Graph. 2.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

15<br />

16 16 – 20 Non flowered<br />

o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6 Non flowered<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers


45<br />

Graph. 3. The phenophases: swelling of buds, opening of buds and flowering of the<br />

individual trees of Acer monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 2.3 8.0 7.8 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.0 7.2 11.2 13.3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 0.4 -1.3 2.2 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9


46<br />

Graph. 3.<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C 3.1 2.5 0.8 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.7 4.7 2.8 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 6.0 4.6 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20


47<br />

Year<br />

2003<br />

Graph. 3.<br />

Tree February March April May<br />

10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10.<br />

o C -2.0 -20 0.9 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

5<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

2004 8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20<br />

o C -3.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 12.6 10.8<br />

- phenophase of the swelling of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the opening of the buds;<br />

- phenophase of the flowering


48<br />

Graph. 4. The phenophase of the flowering of the observed individual trees of Acer<br />

monspessulanum L. (Grebice)<br />

Year<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 5.5 2.1 3.0 11.1 7.2 11.2 13.3 14.4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 5.6 5.7 6.5 9.7 8.2 10.9 14.9 15.8<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9


49<br />

Graph. 4<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 3.6 3.4 7.2 7.3 13.3 14.9 14.5 17.1<br />

10<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20<br />

o C 6.2 9.3 10.2 8.4 6.4 11.9 14.7 14.4<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

o C 9.8 8.9 5.9 7.7 10.8 12.3 14.6 15.8<br />

1<br />

2 Non flowered<br />

3<br />

4 Non flowered<br />

5 Non flowered<br />

6<br />

7 Non flowered<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10 Non flowered<br />

11 Non flowered<br />

12 Non flowered<br />

13 Non flowered<br />

14 Non flowered<br />

15 Non flowered<br />

16<br />

17 Non flowered<br />

18 Non flowered<br />

19 Non flowered<br />

20


50<br />

Year<br />

2003<br />

Graph. 4.<br />

Tree<br />

March April May<br />

5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20. 25. 5. 10. 15. 20.<br />

o C 4.8 4.3 6.9 4.4 11.1 10.9 19.9 17.8<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

2004<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

Legend:<br />

20 Non flowered<br />

o C 0.4 8.5 7.5 10.5 9.7 10.6 12.6 12.3<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the male flowers<br />

- phenophase of the flowering of the female flowers


51<br />

Tripić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FLOWERING PHENOLOGY . . .<br />

According to G u d e s k i & D r e n k o v s k i (1978) relationship between female<br />

and male flowers in individual trees of A. monspessulanum during a year there are only<br />

or almost female flowers or only or almost male flowers, however, in the next year the<br />

situation was contrary or a proximally equal. Our investigation shown different results –<br />

in each year (in seven years of observing) relationship between female and male<br />

flowers of individual trees was similar (Tab. 5. and 6.).<br />

The flowering of the single tree lasted from 2 – 29 days and of the entire<br />

population from 23 – 59 days (the most frequent 30 – 34 days) depending of the<br />

weather conditions, especially temperature, but also, from number of flowered trees,<br />

richness of flowered trees and numeral relationship of male and female flowers on the<br />

tree (Graph. 2., 4.). Phenophases of flowering of male and female flowers on the same<br />

trees were totally separated in time with 1/2 to 7 days of pause between them. During<br />

phenophases of flowering on individual trees, series of male flowers are shown followed<br />

with series of female flowers (protandrous trees) or when there are series of female<br />

flowers they are followed with series of male flowers (protogynous trees). Very rarely<br />

(in case of very good flowering) on same trees another serie of male flowers (♂ - ♀ -<br />

♂) is shown and also very rerely there is (only with one tree during one year) other<br />

serie of female flowers (♀ - ♂ - ♀ - ♂) during period of flowering.<br />

T r i p i ć (2006) presents very similar results for A. obtusatum but for A.<br />

campestre and A. platanoides he presents results that claim that all trees protandrous<br />

trees always had two series of male flowers (♂ - ♀ - ♂) and all protogynous trees<br />

always had only one serie male flowers and one serie female flowers (♀ - ♂).<br />

Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %) trees<br />

in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />

STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). The same trees<br />

always had protandry or protogyny during all years of observation. These are flowering<br />

types of inflorescences that found: A type (♀) – very rare, B type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D<br />

type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E type (♂) – frequent.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The flowers were morphologically false bisexually and functionally unisexual. The<br />

male flowers had very small (rudimentary) pistil and well-developed stamens (long<br />

filaments and yellow functional anthers), and the female flowers had well-developed<br />

pistil and unripe stamens (green, hard and non-functional anthers on very short<br />

filaments). Protogyny is found on 8 (40 %) trees in population STUBICA and 11 (55 %)<br />

trees in population GREBICE, and protandry is found on 12 (60 %) trees in population<br />

STUBICA and 9 (45 %) trees in population GREBICE (Graph. 2., 4.). With 19 of<br />

observed trees, during every year of observing, protogyny is established, while 21 trees


52<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

always had protandry. Total number of the flowers in individual inflorescence varies<br />

from 3 - 28 (male flowers 0 - 24 and female flowers 0 - 12). Quantitative relationship of<br />

the male and female flowers on single trees is 49.46 % - 99.99 % of the male flowers.<br />

The flowering types of inflorescence that were found: A type (♀) – very rare, B<br />

type (♀ - ♂) – frequent, D type (♂ - ♀) – frequent, E (♂)– frequent.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

B E J D E M A N, I. N. 1974: Metodika izučenija fenologiji rastenij i rastitel'nyh<br />

soobšćestv. ANSSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenije, Limnologičeskij Institut, 1-155 pp.<br />

Č A J L A H J A N, M. H. 1988: Reguljacija cvetenija vysših rastenij. AN SSSR,<br />

''Nauka'', Moskva, 3-559 pp.<br />

C H A I L A K H Y A N, M. KH., K H R I A N I N, V. N. 1982: Sex of plants and its<br />

hormonal regulation. AN SSSR, ''Nauka'', Moskva.<br />

G U D E S K I, A. & D R E N K O V S K I, R. 1978: Morfologija i pol na cvetovite kaj<br />

nekoi vidovi od rodot Acer L. Godišen zbornik na Šumarskiot fakultet na<br />

Univerzitet vo Skopje, knj. 28: 6-24 (1977/78), Skopje.<br />

J O N G, P. C. De 1976: Flowering and sex expression in Acer L. Mededelingen,<br />

Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, Nederland, 76-2.<br />

P A L A M A R E V, E. 1979: Acer L. In: Flora na Narodna Republika B’lgarija, VII: 221<br />

– 240, Izdatelstvo na B’lgarskata Akademija na naukite, Sofija,<br />

P A X, F. 1885: Monographie der Gattung Acer L. Engler's botanischen Jahrbüchern,<br />

Band VII, Heft 2: 177- 263, Leipzig.<br />

P A X, F. 1902: Aceraceae. In: A. Engler, Das Pflanzenreich IV, 163, 8: 1-89, Leipzig.<br />

P O J A R K O V A, A. I. 1933: Botaniko-geografičeskij obzor klenov SSSR v svjazi s<br />

istoriej vsego roda Acer L. Trudy Botaničeskogo instituta AN SSSR, Ser. I: 225-<br />

374, Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Leningrad.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer obtusatum<br />

Waldst. & Kit. from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 15-24, Natural History<br />

Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer campestre L.<br />

from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina N o 5: 25-36, Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica.<br />

T R I P I Ć, R. 2006: Contribution to the knowledge of flowering phenology and sex<br />

expression in Acer platanoides L. from Montenegro. (In press).<br />

Z A M J A T N I N, B. N. 1958: Acer L. In: Derev’ja i kustarniki SSSR, IV: 405 – 499,<br />

Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moskva – Leningrad.<br />

Received: 25. 12. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:53-61<br />

THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

Snežana V U K S A N O V I Ć 1 & Danka PETROVIĆ 2<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg vojvode Bećir bega Osmanagića 7, Podgorica; Montenegro,<br />

E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu; vukss@cg.yu<br />

2 The University of Montenegro Faculty of science, Department of Biology, Cetinjski put b.b., Podgorica;<br />

Montenegro, E-mail: danka.petrovic@cg.yu<br />

Кеy words:<br />

Ulcinj Salts,<br />

taxon,<br />

flora,<br />

vegetation types,<br />

species,<br />

habitats<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Ulcinjska Solana,<br />

takson,<br />

vegetacijski tipovi,<br />

vrste,<br />

stanista (habitati)<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

The results two years’ research of flora and vegetation<br />

of Ulcinj Salts have been presented in this paper. A rare<br />

taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima noted until now in flora of<br />

Montenegro only at one locality, was found. The paper<br />

consists of a review of vegetation types present in the Salt<br />

Works with a list of species which form them. A table with<br />

names of species and habitats they inhabit has also been<br />

presented.<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

FLORA I VEGETACIJA ULCINJSKE SOLANE<br />

U radu su predstavljeni rezultati istraživanja flore i<br />

vegetacije ulcinjske Solane tokom dvije godine. Pronađen je<br />

rijetki takson Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima koji se u flori <strong>Crne</strong><br />

<strong>Gore</strong> bilježi još na samo jednom lokalitetu. U radu je dat<br />

pregled tipova vegetacije prisutnih na prostoru Solane uz<br />

spisak vrsta koje ih izgrađuju. Na kraju je predstavljena<br />

tabela sa imenima vrsta i habitata koje naseljavaju.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Ulcinj Salt Works are located in the far south of Montenegro. Built in the<br />

region with the biggest number of sunny days, the greatest insolation and the biggest<br />

number of tropical days in the former SFRY (M i c e v et all, 1995), they occupy around<br />

15 km 2 of salt pools. In the past, at the area of today’s salt pans there was Zoganjsko<br />

blato (mud), swamp with brackish water, which started assuming anthropogenic<br />

infrastructural form by end thirties of the century before last (H a d ž i b r a h i m o v i ć ,


54<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

2002). Today, these are artificial, men-directed ecosystems, where the time for filling<br />

the pools with the sea water, the level of water therein and water salinity are set in<br />

advance. The immediate vicinity of the sea, the Bojana River, Šasko Lake, Velipolje in<br />

Albania, and of the Lake of Skadar, makes this “Cultural Laguna”, as V a s i ć called it<br />

(1989), very interesting for ornithology and the science in general.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

The investigations of flora and vegetation of Salt Works, presented in this<br />

paper, were carried out in 2003 and 2004. During the first year, only one field visit<br />

was made (June), while in 2004 field visits were taking place during the entire<br />

vegetation season (March-October). The material collected on the filed was<br />

subsequently determined, put into herbaria and deposited with the Natural History<br />

Museum of Montenegro. The borders of vegetation entities were recorded and the<br />

alteration thereof depending on the time of year and the water level in the basins was<br />

monitored. The paper includes an overview of the types of vegetation present in the<br />

area of Salt Pans along with a list of species that make up these types of vegetation.<br />

HALOPHYLOUS VEGETATION<br />

Grounds with a large quantity of salt are unfavourable for plant life, and thus<br />

they are inhabited only with the species that are specifically adapted to cruel living<br />

conditions in these habitats. Such plants, known as halophytes, form floristically poor,<br />

but very interesting plant cover. Typical or genuine halophytes or euhalophytes can be<br />

found in the habitats with high salinity degree and significant moistness. Their<br />

communities present a predominant type of vegetation in the Salt Works. They were<br />

found on the muddy-clayish boundary places of the pools, Lake I, Lake II, canals, as<br />

well as on the embankments. They partially have an emerged character, i.e. they<br />

inhabit shallow waters. The zonation of halophytic vegetation in the Salt Works is inter<br />

alia determined by the composition of canals and embankments.<br />

The association of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev., is developed on<br />

very salty and constantly flooded sites, and some associations are located in shallow<br />

waters. The species Salicornia herbacea L. is predominating species of this<br />

community. In addition to this taxon, the association is dominated by Sueda maritima<br />

Dum, while less numerous are the species Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen<br />

and Atriplex portulacoides L. As accompanying species there appear Salsola soda L.<br />

and Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC. The community emerges in the month of May,<br />

and right before the end of summer and in autumn, when Salicornia blossoms and<br />

gets a characteristic red colour, the community reaches the peak of its development.<br />

The community of Arthrocnemetum fruticosi Br. – Bl., which appears on the salt<br />

grounds very often in combination with the community of Salicornietum herbaceae<br />

Jank. & Stev., is present only in fragments on the Salt Works. It develops at


55<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

somewhat distant, always flooded and very salty places. It is of the same floristic<br />

composition, but there is a difference in the level of presence of certain species.<br />

These two communities are at some places mosaically combined. In the dry and less<br />

salty areas the characteristic species in the community is Limonium angustifolium<br />

(Tausch) Degen.<br />

The best developed species of euhalophyta are located in the beginning zone<br />

of the lake I (in the vicinity of blue houses). These are real meadows on which one<br />

can notice two zones of halophytic vegetation. The first one, developed along the<br />

water, is made up of the community of Salicornietum herbaceae Jank. & Stev .<br />

Going toward the dams and canal, the second, more complexly built halophytic zone,<br />

appears. It is formed by constituents of diverse floristic composition, which alternate<br />

mosaically among each other. These are: pure constituents of the species Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen; constituents wherein along with Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear: Atriplex portulacoides L., Sueda maritime Dum.<br />

and Carex sp.; the dominant species Sueda maritima Dum. and Carex sp; constituents<br />

wherein Sueda maritime Dum. and Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen appear<br />

along Carex sp.,; pure constituens of Carex sp. As accompanying species there<br />

appear: Spergularia salina Presl, Plantago coronopus L. and Coronopus squamatus<br />

(Forsskal) Asch.<br />

In the remaining parts of the Salt Works (Lake II, First Evaporation, pools of<br />

Zoganj, Second Evaporation, dams) there are also two halophytic zones wherein the<br />

euhalophytic vegetation is dispersed in the same way, although it is less developed. In<br />

the crystallisation basins and along the margins of the canal we find individual<br />

specimens, which do not form communities.<br />

Going further from the water, the terrain rises (soil becomes deeper), salinity<br />

and humidity of the ground decrease. In this area the dominant species become those<br />

which appear in the second zone of the halophytic vegetation as accompanying<br />

species (Spergularia salina Presl., Plantago coronopus L. i Coronopus squamatus<br />

(Forsskal) Asch). This type of vegetation is best developed during April and in the<br />

beginning of May, when dominant species blossom. By the passing of the vegetation<br />

season, there start to emerge the elements of meadow and ruderal vegetation which<br />

become the dominant ones.<br />

On the dams, which divide the basins, the species Inula crithmoides L., an<br />

important element of halophytic vegetation, appears.<br />

MEADOW VEGETATION<br />

The communities of meadow flora spread in deeper layers of the ground with<br />

less salinity. Meadow type of vegetation exists on the raised land along the channel<br />

leading to Lake I. On the meadow, different aspects change each other during the<br />

vegetation season. During March geophyte are predominant, such as: Narcissus<br />

tazetta L., <strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast. & Mauri, Hyacinthus orientalis L. and<br />

Ornithogalum sp. Later, the following species dominate in the meadow: Avena barbata


56<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Pott ex Link, Dactylis glomerata L., Phragmites comunis Trin., Carex sp., and during<br />

the autumn Limonium angustifolium L. is also present. The facies with dominant<br />

species Trifolium nigricens Viv. exists only in fragments. Accompanying elements of<br />

such communities are Anemone hortensis L., Anagalis arvensis L., Bellis perennis L.,<br />

Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton, Echium vulgare L., Silene gallica L. etc.<br />

In the central part of meadow situated between First evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj, typical meadow vegetation is developed during the spring, with dominating<br />

species: Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link, Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />

Haywood, Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl., Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.)<br />

Fritsch etc. But, in autumn, at the same space, predominant species is Limonium<br />

angustifolium (Tausch) Degen. The community with distinctive taxon Juncus acutus L.<br />

cover the rest of meadow. Like the first-mentioned meadow the same geophyte are<br />

developed in March, and here are noted the represents of family Orchidaceae: Orchis<br />

laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L., and S. vomeracea (Burm) Briq.<br />

REEDS<br />

Under natural conditions, the reeds reach Phragmites communis Trin. Its most<br />

intesive development is on swampy, boggy and peat-boggy soils with a sufficient<br />

water layer above the soil surface 60-80 cm. On dry or drying-up habitats the reed can<br />

only develop if the ground water level is high (not deeper than 3-4 cm below the<br />

surface)(N i k o l a j e v s k i j , V. G. 1971.).<br />

Uniform constituents of reed by Phragmition communis W. Koch are located in<br />

pools and canals, in places, formed the islands that raised above the water. Specially,<br />

constituens of reed are well developed in area of Second evaporation. We believe that<br />

reed will continue to expand and occupy new water surface areas. This species is<br />

present as an accompanying element in the vegetation of wet meadows as well.<br />

In muddy coastal area, the community Juncetum maritime-acuti Hić. exists<br />

only in fragments. The component species of such community are Juncus acutus L.<br />

and J. maritimus Lam. Individual trees of taxon Tamarix africana Poiret can also<br />

frequently be found.<br />

RUDERAL VEGETATION<br />

Ruderal plants belong to a widespread type of vegetation inhabiting areas<br />

exposed to the intensive human influence. They can be found in the areas of<br />

permanent or temporary settlements of people and domestic animals, around roads,<br />

railroads, embankments … On the land around Salt-Work, ruderal vegetation is<br />

present along the whole road, on embankments along the railroad, and the elements<br />

of this flora are mixed with halophytes vegetation and on the embankments separating<br />

individual basins.


57<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The communities of halophyte plants are floristically poor, but ecologically very<br />

interesting, these plants are specifically adapted to cruel living conditions at their<br />

habitats. Development of tourism and strong urbanization in coastal part of<br />

Montenegro, cause for disappearing of several habitats of this type of vegetation<br />

(Topolica-Bar, Igalo). Preserved and not fragmentary communities of typical<br />

halophytes exist only on land around the Salt Works in Ulcinj and Tivatsko polje.<br />

Because that, Salt Works in Ulcinj are very important for preservation of these<br />

communities.<br />

Among the plants growing on Salt Works, Ophrys bertolonii Moretti, species<br />

from family Orchidaceae, is particularly interesting and important, and it is protected in<br />

Montenegro. Many representatives of this family are included in Red Lists in most of<br />

the countries of Europe, and there are some suggestions to protect them also in<br />

Montenegro.<br />

It is very important to mention the species of this family that are presented in the<br />

meadow flora on Salt Works, such as: Orchis laxiflora Lam., Serapias lingua L.i S.<br />

vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu..<br />

The finding concerning the subspecies Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime, up to now<br />

has been noted only at one locality (A d a m o v i c 1913, sand betwen Bar and Ulcinj).<br />

We consider that the most important sites of Salt Works regarding the flora and<br />

vegetation are localities with the best developed belt of halophyte and where we found<br />

the most interesting plants (species). The best development stands of euhalophyte are<br />

located by the Lake I, as well as on the embankment that separates Lake I from Lake<br />

II. The taxon Beta vulgaris ssp. maritime was found on this embankment, too, so we<br />

believe that area should be preserved from any intervention intended for the<br />

rehabilitation of Salt Works. On meadow situated between First evaporation and pools<br />

of Zoganj we found mentioned representatives of family Orchidaceae, and taxon<br />

Ophrys bertolonii Moretti was noted at the beginning of the path that separates<br />

Knete from Lake II.<br />

Therefore these localities should not be subjected to any interventions regarding<br />

the rehabilitation of Salt-Works.<br />

Domination of ruderal vegetation on Salt Works (except ground with large<br />

quantity of salt) shows that there is a strong influence of man and cattle. But<br />

halophyte vegetation is not exposed to grazing, because the cattle avoid plants with<br />

high contents of salt.<br />

SPECISMENS<br />

Ajuga chamaepitys (L.) Schreb<br />

Alkana tinctoria (L.) Tausch<br />

Anemone hortensis L.<br />

Anagalis arvensis L.<br />

Anchusa officinalis L.<br />

HABITAT<br />

near road, meadow<br />

near road<br />

near road, meadow<br />

near road, meadow<br />

meadow


58<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Anthemis arvensis L.<br />

near road<br />

Aristolochia rotunda L.<br />

embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />

Arum maculatum L.<br />

meadow<br />

Asphodelus microcarpus Viv.<br />

near pools of Zoganj<br />

Aster tripolium L.<br />

embankment with Tamarix (behind Zoganjski pools)<br />

Atriplex portulacoides L.<br />

around lake I, embankments<br />

Atriplex prostrata Boucher ex DC.<br />

around lake I, embankments<br />

Avena barbata Pott ex Link<br />

meadow near lake I<br />

Bellis perennis L<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima<br />

embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Bidens tripartita L.<br />

near road, embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) Stirton<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Blackstonia perfoliata (L.) Huds<br />

embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

Calepina irregularis (Asso) Thell<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Cardamine hirsuta L.<br />

near road, meadow near lake I<br />

Carex sp.<br />

meadow<br />

Centaurea alba L.<br />

embankment behind Zoganjski pools<br />

C. calcitrapa L. near road<br />

C. solstitialis L. near road<br />

Centaurium erythraea Rafn.<br />

meadow<br />

Cichorium intybus L<br />

near road<br />

Cirsium arvensis (L.) Scop<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Clematis viticella L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Clinopodium vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Convolvulus arvensis L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Coronopus squamatus (Forsskal) Asch. raised land near lake I<br />

Cynoglossum creticum Miller<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Dactylis glomerata L.<br />

meadow near lake I<br />

Daucus carota L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Delphinium peregrinum L.<br />

near road above lake I<br />

Ditrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter<br />

near road, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Dorycnium hirsutum (L.) Ser.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Echium vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Epilobium hirsutum L.<br />

near canal behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Her<br />

near road<br />

E. malacoides (L.) L’Her near road<br />

Eryngium amethistinum L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Eupatorium cannabinum L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Euphorbia helioscopia L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

E. peplis L. near canal along lake I


59<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

E. peplus L. near road<br />

E. terracina L. near road toward Kneta<br />

E. seguieriana Necker near road toward Kneta<br />

Filago vulgaris Lam.<br />

near road<br />

Geranium columbinum L.<br />

near road<br />

G. dissectum L. near road<br />

G. robertianum L. near road, meadow<br />

G. brutim Gasparr. meadow<br />

Hyacinthus orientalis L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Helichrysum italicum (Roth.) G. Don<br />

near road<br />

Heliotropium europaeum L.<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Hordeum vulgare L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Hypericum perforatum L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Inula brittanica L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

I. crithmoides L. embankments<br />

Juncus acutus L.<br />

muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />

J. maritimus Lam. muddy places near pools of Zoganj<br />

Kickxia commutata (Bernh. ex Reichenb.) meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Fritisch<br />

Lamium purpureum L.<br />

near road<br />

Lathyrus cicera L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Limonium angustifolium (Tausch) Degen near pools, canals, on medow<br />

Linaria vulgaris Miller<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Linum nodiflorum L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

L. usitatissimum L. meadow<br />

Lotus corniculatus L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Medicago minima (L.) L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Melilotus officinalis (L.) Pallas<br />

embankment, near road<br />

Moenchia mantica (L.) Bartl.<br />

meadow, embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Muscari comosum (L.) Miller<br />

meadow, embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Narcissus tazetta L.<br />

meadow<br />

Nigella damascena L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Ophrys bertolonii Moretti<br />

road between first evaporation and Kneta<br />

Orchis laxiflora Lam.<br />

meadow<br />

Ornithogalum sp.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Oxalis corniculata L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Parentucellia latifolia (L.)Caruel<br />

meadow<br />

Petrorhagia prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball &<br />

near road, meadow<br />

Heywood<br />

Petrorhagia saxifraga (L.) Link.<br />

meadow<br />

Phragmites communis Trin<br />

pools, canals, humid medow<br />

Picris hieracioides L<br />

near road<br />

Plantago coronopus L.<br />

raised salt land


60<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

P. lanceolata L. near road<br />

P. major L. near road<br />

Polygonum aviculare L.<br />

along the road, embankment<br />

Portulaca oleracea L.<br />

embankment between lake I and lake II<br />

Prunella laciniata (L.) L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

P. vulgaris L. near road, meadow<br />

Pulicaria dysenterica (L.) Bernh<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Reseda phyteuma L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

<strong>Rom</strong>ulea bulbocodium (L.) Sebast.& Mauri near road, meadow<br />

Rosa canina L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road<br />

toward Kneta<br />

Rubus idaeus L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

Salicornia herbacea L.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Salsola soda L.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Salvia verbenaca L.<br />

near road, meadow<br />

S. verticillata L. near road, meadow<br />

Scandix pectin-veneris L.<br />

near road<br />

Scolymus hispanicus L.<br />

near road, embankments<br />

Senecio rupestris Waldst. & Kit.<br />

near road<br />

Serapias lingua L.<br />

meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj<br />

S. vomeracea (Burm.) Briqu. meadow between first evaporation and pools of<br />

Zoganj<br />

Sherardia arvensis L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Silene conica L.<br />

meadow<br />

Silene gallica L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Silene nocturna L.<br />

meadow<br />

Solanum nigrum L.<br />

embankments, near road<br />

Sonchus arvensis L.<br />

near road<br />

Spergularia salina<br />

raised salt land<br />

Stellaria media (L.) Vill.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Suaeda maritime Dum.<br />

salt, humid places<br />

Tamarix africana Poir.<br />

humid medow<br />

Taraxacum officinale Weber<br />

meadow<br />

Teucrium chamaedrys L.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Trifolium campestre Schreber<br />

meadow, near road<br />

T. incarnatum L. meadow<br />

T. nigricens Viv. meadow, near road<br />

T. resupinatum L. meadow<br />

T. subterraneum L. meadow<br />

Trigonella esculenta Willd.<br />

near road<br />

Verbascum sinuatum L.<br />

near road<br />

Verbena officinalis L.<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj, near road


61<br />

Vuksanović & Petrović: THE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF SALT WORKS IN ULCINJ<br />

Veronica arvensis L.<br />

meadow<br />

V. chamaedrys L. meadow, near road<br />

Vicia grandiflora Scop.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Vicia sativa L. subsp. nigra (L.) Ehrh.<br />

meadow, near road<br />

Vincetoxucum hirundinaria Medicus<br />

embankment behind pools of Zoganj<br />

LITERATURE<br />

D O M A C , R. 1967: Ekskurzijska flora Hrvtske i susjednih područja. - Institut za<br />

botaniku sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Zagreb, 543pp.<br />

JANKOVIĆ , M., S T E V A N O V I Ć , V. 1983: Prilog poznavanju slatinske vegetacije<br />

Boke Kotorske. - Zbornik Roberta Visianija Šibenčanina, Muzej grada Šibenika<br />

10:377-396<br />

HORVATIĆ , S. 1934: Flora i vegetacija otoka Paga. - Prir. istraž. Jugosl. Akad. znan. i<br />

umjetnosti, Zagreb. 19: 116-372.<br />

HORVATIĆ , S. 1963: Vegetacijska karta otoka Paga s općim pregledom<br />

vegetacijskih jedinica Hrvatskog primorja. Prir. istraz., Acta Biol. IV/33: 5 - 187.<br />

JAZU, Zagreb<br />

J A V O R K A , S., C S A P O D Y , V. 1934: Iconographia florae Hungaricae, Budapest.<br />

576 pp.<br />

K A R A M A N , V. 1997: Flora istočnog dijela Bokokotorskog zaliva. Magistarski rad. - Biološki<br />

fakultet, Beograd ( manuscr.). 186 pp.<br />

NIKOLAJEVSKIJ, V. G. 1971: Research into the Biology of the Common Reed<br />

(Phragmites communis Trin.) in the U.S.S.R. - Folia-geobotanica Phytotaxonomica<br />

6/2: 221 – 230. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praha.<br />

P A R O L L Y , G. 1992: Die Orchideenflora Montenegros. - AHO Mitteilungsblatt,<br />

Baden Wuertenberg 24 (2): 141 -391<br />

P I G N A T T I , S. 1982: Flora d' Italia. 1-3. - Edagricole, Bologna<br />

PULEVIĆ , V. 2005: Građa za floru <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. - Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode,<br />

Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />

R O H L E N A , J. 1942: Conspectus florae Montenegrinae 20-21: 1-506.- Preslia,<br />

Praha.<br />

T U T I N , T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE, D. H.,<br />

WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964-1980: Flora Europaea 1-5<br />

Cambridge.<br />

T U T I N , T. G., BURGES, N. A., CHATER, A. O., EDMONDS, J. R., HEYWOOD, V.<br />

H., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M. & WEBB, D. A. 1993:<br />

Flora Europaea. Vol. 1. - Sec. ed. Cambridge. 581pp.<br />

Received: 24. 11. 2007.


62<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:63-71<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL<br />

DYNAMICS OF THE PLANCTONIC POLYCHETA IN SOUTH ADRIATIC WATERS<br />

Vera VUKANIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

Faculty of Technical Science, Departmant of Technics, Chemistry and Biology, The University of Novi<br />

Pazar, Vuka Karadzica bb, Novi Pazar, Serbia; v_vukanic@yahoo.com<br />

Key words:<br />

polycheta,<br />

Tomopteris elegans,<br />

Adriatic,<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska,<br />

distribution<br />

Synopsis<br />

This paper presents the first data about seasonal<br />

overveiw of horisontal distribution and abundance for the<br />

genus Polycheta in Bay of Boka Kotorska. The only<br />

determined species was Tomopteris elegans Chun, which is<br />

present throughout the Adriatic Sea, but as it has a quite<br />

narrow ecological valence its abundance is much greater in<br />

deep open waters of the Adriatic than in the coastal waters.<br />

Also presented are seasonal oscillations and quantitative<br />

presence of Polycheta population during 2002.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Polycheta,<br />

Tomoperis elegans,<br />

Jadran,<br />

Bokokotorski zaliv,<br />

distribucija<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU DISTRIBUCIJE I SEZONSKE<br />

DINAMIKE PLANKTONSKIH POLIHETA U JUŽNOM<br />

JADRANU<br />

U radu iznosimo prve pregledne podatke o sezonskoj<br />

horizontalnoj distribuciji i abundanciji roda Polycheta u<br />

Bokokotorskom zalivu. Determinisana je samo vrsta<br />

Tomopteris elegans Chun, koja je prisutna u cijelom Jadranu.<br />

Ova vrsta ima prilično usku ekološku valencu, tako da ima<br />

mnogo veću abundanciju u pučinskim dubokim vodama<br />

Jadrana nego u priobalnim vodama. Takođe smo prikazali<br />

sezonske oscilacije i kvantitativno prisustvo cijele grupe<br />

Polycheta tokom 2002. godine.


64<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Geographic position and specific ecological conditions make Bay of Boka Kotorska<br />

a distinct biotope. The interactive relationships of its wildlife are influenced by influx of<br />

freshwater from the mainland as well as the currents from the open sea. Therefore, we<br />

tried to use the data collected in one-year cycle of study in order to determine the<br />

main regularities in oscillations of ecological parameters, important for fluctuations in<br />

diversity of Polycheta biocenosis. Research on pelagic polychaetes in Adriatic had<br />

started alredy in the 19 centry. The first data were collected in Northern Adriatic<br />

(B u s c h , 1851; V e j d o v s k i , 1876; A p s t e i n , 1893; B a l d a s s e r o n i , 1914) and<br />

Otrant strata (R o s a , 1912). Data for eastern coast and South Adriatic are mentioned<br />

only in recent times (K n e ž e v i ć , 1942; G a m u l i n , 1948, 1979; H u r e , 1961;<br />

Vukanić ,D., 1975.; B a t i s t i ć et al. 2004; V u k a n i ć ,V., 2004). H u r e (1961) cited<br />

the following species for the open waters of South Adriatic: Loperorhynchus<br />

uncinatus, Alciopa cantrainii, Vanadis formosa, Tomopteris helgolandica, Tomopteris<br />

elegans. Tomopteris elegans is the most common Adriatic species cited by H u r e<br />

(1955). V u k a n i ć ,D. (1975) presented data on participation of polychaetes in total<br />

zooplankton of coastal waters of open South Adriatic with 0.80% and at 6 NM off the<br />

shore with 0.17%. G a m u l i n (1979) cited the species recorded by Zei in 1956:<br />

Tomopteris elegans, T. helgolandica, Alciope contrainii, Vanadis formosa and V.<br />

crystallina. Batistić et al. (2004) when discussing material collected on a cruise<br />

from April 1993 to February 1994, cited the following species for the South Adriatic:<br />

Tomopteris elegans, Callizonella lepidota, Callizona nasuta, Pelagobia longicirrata,<br />

Sagitella kowalevskii, Travisiopsis lanceolata i Typhloscolex muelleri.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHOD<br />

Study area - Boka Kotorska Bay is situated in the southeastern part of Adriatic.<br />

Its geographical position is determined by key points: 42º31'N, 42º23'32''S,<br />

18º46'32''E and 18º30'29W. It penetrates into the mainland for 28 km and is composed<br />

of four interconnected bays: Herceg Novi Bay (which directly communicates with the<br />

open sea), Tivat Bay, as well as the inner bays, Risan and Kotor. The surrounding<br />

mainland is a karstic area, arid during summer, while in autumn, winter and early<br />

spring it has the most plentiful precipitation in Europe (6000 mm). Boka Kotorska Bay<br />

is under a strong influence of waters from deep southern Adriatic and the entering<br />

Eastern Mediterranean current from one side, while on the other side there is a huge<br />

influx of freshwater from the surrounding mainland in autumn and winter-spring<br />

season, making it a very dynamic system with specific physical-chemical and<br />

biological characteristics. At the southwest, in front of the entrance to Boka Kotorska<br />

Bay, there is a point where the greatest depth of Adriatic Sea was measured (1330m).


65<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Fig.1. Map of sampling area in southern Adriatic - Bay of Boka Kotorska: 1. P-IBM<br />

(Sampling point near the Marine Biology Institute); 2. P-K (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Kotor’s Bay); 3. P-O (Sampling point near Orahovac); 4. P-R (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Risan’s Bay); 5. P-M (Sampling point near Morinj); 6. P-T (Sampling point in central part of<br />

Tivat’ Bay); 7. P-HN (Sampling point in central part of Herceg Novi’s Bay).<br />

Sampling - Zooplankton was sampled in 2002, on 25 th each month, at seven<br />

stations. The plankton nets used were of Nansen type, either surface area of the<br />

opening 1/4m 2 - length 2.5m, or surface area of the opening 1m 2 - length 3.5m. The<br />

density of the mesh was 150µm and 200µm. Vertical samples were taken from 10m to<br />

0m at the shallow stations of each bay. The collected zooplankton material was<br />

fixated on the ship, in 2.5% formaldehyde-sea water. The qualitative quantitative<br />

analyses were done in the laboratory from the representative sample of 1/25 of total<br />

catch, under the stereomicroscope and binocular lens. After that, the whole catch was<br />

carefully analyzed in order to record any rare species. The quantity was presented as<br />

number of individuals under m -2 below sea surface (ind.m -2 ). Temperature, salinity,


66<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

pH, oxygen saturation and percent oxygen saturation were measured in situ with a<br />

probe Multiline P-4, at 0.5m, 2m, 5m and 10m in the shallow part of the Bay near the<br />

coast, and at 0.5 m, 10m, 15m, 20m and 30m of depth at central deep stations. The<br />

transparency of the sea was measured with Secchi disk, 30 cm in diameter, of white<br />

color. Color of the sea was measured according to Forell from I to XXI.<br />

RESULTS AND DICUSSION<br />

Environmental conditions - The maximal temperature (27.7ºC) was recorded in<br />

July, while the medium maximal temperature of all layers was 25.3ºC. The minimal<br />

temperature (10ºC) was recorded in Risan Bay (P 2 -R) in February. The salinity of the<br />

sea varied within the values 7.9‰ - 38.71‰, and the lowest value ever recorded in the<br />

Bay was registered at the shallow station P-IBM in the surface layer 0-5m, 2.30‰ in<br />

September. Oxygen saturation varied from 4.68mL/L at the surface of Herceg Novi<br />

Bay (P 4 -HN) in June and July to 33.7mL/L at the 10 m depth at shallow station P-O in<br />

June. The percent of oxygen saturation was over 100%, and the greatest value was<br />

recorded at the shallow station P-O in June (220%), while at the surface at the middle<br />

of Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) it was 117%. The high values of oxygen saturation, which<br />

exceeded 100% throughout the year, show that the Bay is a biotope with a high<br />

degree of trophic activity. The whole Bay had relatively low values of transparency,<br />

from 4 m in Kotor Bay (P 1 -K) in September, to 15 m in Herceg Novi Bay (P 4 -HN) in<br />

January. The color of the sea according to Forell ranged from II in June to VI in<br />

September.<br />

Policheta general distribution – Polychaetes have occasionally been recorded<br />

in small numbers in Bay of Boka Kotorska. Their percentage participation within the<br />

whole zooplankton was: in Bay of Kotor 0.11%, in Bay of Risan 0.22%, in Bay of Tivat<br />

0.21% in Bay of Hercegnovi 0.73%. They are the most abundant during the autumn<br />

season. We have determined the species Tomopteris elegans Chun, which was<br />

occasionally recorded at all stations.<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

Polycheta [TOTAL]<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.1. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study


67<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Postaje<br />

Sezone<br />

P-IBM P-O P-M P 1 -K P 2 -R P 3 -T P 4 -HN<br />

Zima 200 200 200 600 1200 400 100<br />

Proljeće 300 1100 1100 900 1000 100 600<br />

Ljeto 100 800 600 700 200 200 600<br />

Jesen 200 3100 600 4100 2300 2700 12600<br />

% 0.1 0.5 0.34 0.11 0.22 0.21 0.73<br />

Tab.1. Percentage participation of Polycheta group (ind/m 2 ) in total zooplankton during the study<br />

Polycheta<br />

Total zooplankton<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

5000000<br />

4000000<br />

3000000<br />

2000000<br />

1000000<br />

0<br />

Fig.2. Logarithm presentation of oscillations in abundance<br />

of total zooplankton and the polychaete group<br />

Tomopteris elegans Chun was the most abundant pelagic polychaete in the<br />

Adriatic. It was occasionally recorded at all stations in Boka Kotorska Bay, in<br />

insignificant number or as single individuals; it was more common and abundant in the<br />

Bay of Herceg Novi in autumn season. The percentage participation of this species<br />

within the total number of polychaete in the Bay was 3.27%. This species does not<br />

tolerate large variations in hydrographic factors, has a quite narrow ecological valence<br />

and therefore much larger abundance in the open sea waters of the Adriatic.<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.3. Oscillations of abundance of species Tomopteris elegans in<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study


68<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

The larval stages of polychaetes were very abundant. The smaller maximum of<br />

abundance was recorded in March and April and the larger maximum in October and<br />

November. The percentage participation of larval stages in total number of recorded<br />

polychaete specimens was 71.27%. The other individuals of this group participated<br />

with 20.20% in total number of polychaetes. These are the first data on this group of<br />

organisms for Bay of Boka Kotorska.<br />

Polycheta larvae<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Fig.4. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta larvae in Bay of Boka Kotorska during the study<br />

Bay of Kotor<br />

Bay of Risan<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Bay of Tivat<br />

Bay of Hercegnovi<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Policheta larvae<br />

Policheta sp.<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Fig.6. Percentage participation of certain taxa from Polycheta group, for each bay separately


69<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

Fig.5. Oscillations of abundance of Polycheta group throughout the year, for each bay separately<br />

Bay of Kotor<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Bay of Risan<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Bay of Tivat<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.


70<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Bay of Hercegnovi<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

Polychaeta larvae<br />

Tomopteris elegans<br />

Polycheta sp.<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Bay of Boka Kotorska is a typical neritic area of the eastern coast of Southern<br />

Adriatic. In the zooplankton biocenosis of the Bay we have recorded a great<br />

abundance of larval and juvenile forms. A large number of species was recorded in<br />

Polychaete group longitudinally from the inner bay (Bay of Kotor and Bay of Risan)<br />

toward the other bays (Bay of Tivat and Bay of Herceg Novi), together with a high<br />

abundance of larval forms toward the inner bays.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

APSTEIN,C., 1893: Die Alciopiden der Berliner Zool. Sammlung. – Arch. Naturg.<br />

59(1).<br />

B A L D A S S E R O N I ,V., 1914: Nota sui Tifloscolecidi raccolti della R.N. ‘’Ciclope’’<br />

nelle crociere III-IV. – R.Com. Tal. It. Mem. 38, 1-19.<br />

BATISTIĆ ,M., K R Š I N I Ć , F., JASPRICA, N., CARIĆ , M., V I L I Č I Ć ,<br />

LUČ O Ć , D.& D. 2004: Gelatinous Invertebrate Zooplankton of the South<br />

Adriatic: Species Composition and Vertical Distribution. Journal of Plankton<br />

Research, Vol.26. (3). p.1-16.<br />

B U S C H ,W., 1851: Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklung einiger<br />

werbelloser Seetiere. 1 – 143. Berlin.<br />

G A M U L I N ,T., 1948: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona srednjedalmatinskog otočnog<br />

područja. Acta Adriatica, 3(7), 159-194.<br />

G A M U L I N , T., 1979: Zooplankton istočne obale Jadranskog mora. Acta Biologica,<br />

8/j – 10, prir. istr., 43,p.177-217.


71<br />

Vukanić: CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION AND . . .<br />

H U R E , J., 1955: Distribution annuelle verticale du zooplancton sur une station de<br />

l'Adriatique meridionale.–Acta Adriatica, 7(7),1–72.<br />

H U R E , J., 1961: Dnevna migracija i sezonska vertikalna raspodjela zooplanktona<br />

dubljeg mora.–Ibid., 9(6),1–60).<br />

KNEŽEVIĆ , M.,1942: Prilog poznavanju geografske rasprostranjenosti Tomopterida<br />

u Jadranskom moru. – Vter. Arh., 12(11), 495-496.<br />

R O S A , D., 1912: Nota sui Tomopteridi dell Adriatico raccoleti Navi ‘’Montebello’’ e<br />

‘’Ciclope’’. – R.Com. Tal. Ital., Mem. 26,1-10.<br />

V E J D O V S K I , F., 1878: Beiträge der Tomopteriden. – Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool. 31.<br />

VUKANIĆ ,D., 1975: Prilog poznavanju zooplanktona obalnih voda južnog Jadrana.<br />

Ekologija/Acta Biologica Jugoslavica/.10,1 , 79–106.<br />

VUKANIĆ ,V., 2004: Ekološka studija zooplanktona u funkciji analize stanja i zaštite<br />

biodiverziteta Bokokotorskog zaliva; (Magistarska teza) Biološki fakultet,<br />

Univerziteta u Beogradu, SiCG p.1-128.<br />

Z E I ,M., 1956: Pelagic Polychaetes of the Adriatic. – Thalassia Jugosl., 1,2, 33-68.<br />

Received: 02. 10. 2007.


72<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:73-89<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF<br />

THE RIVER ZETA (MONTENEGRO)<br />

Bogić GLIGOROVIĆ 1) , Vladimir PEŠIĆ 2) & Aleksandra Z E K O V I Ć 1)<br />

1<br />

Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro (bogic1@cg.yu)<br />

2<br />

Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put b.b., 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro (pesicv@cg.yu)<br />

Key words:<br />

dragonflies,<br />

new records,<br />

faunistics,<br />

the Zeta River,<br />

Montenegro.<br />

Synopsis<br />

An updated list of the dragonflies (Odonata) of the<br />

River Zeta (Montenegro) is given, including 27 species.<br />

Three of them: Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus<br />

(Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus) are new for<br />

fauna of Montenegro.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

vilini konjici,<br />

novi nalazi,<br />

faunistika,<br />

rijeka Zeta,<br />

Crna Gora.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU ODONATA (Odonata) RIJEKE ZETE<br />

(CRNA GORA)<br />

U radu je data lista vilinih konica (Odonata) rijeke Zete<br />

(Crna Gora), koja uključuje 27 vrsta. Tri vrste: Aeshna afinis<br />

Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus<br />

vulgatisimus (Linneus) nove su za faunu <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Although the order Odonata is an important group among the insects, studies of<br />

the Odonata fauna in Montenegro are too few (e.g., A d a m o v i ć , 1949, 1996;<br />

Adamović et al., 1996). The aim of our studies is both to give a new insight in the<br />

fauna of the country, and to obtain valuable documentation of the occurence of<br />

dragonflies in the previously unstudied area of the River Zeta. In the course of this<br />

survey, we detected 27 species, among them 3 are new for the fauna of Montenegro.


74<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 1. Map of study area<br />

with the sampling sites.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

In 2006-2007 the dragonflies fauna from 8 sampling sites on the River Zeta were<br />

studied (Fig. 1). The River Zeta is the main tributary of the River Morača and belongs<br />

to the drainage basin of the Skadar Lake, which is the largest lake of the Balkan<br />

Peninsula, with a surface area varying between 370 and 600 km 2 . Lakes Skadar and<br />

Ohrid and the River Drim, compose the largest river system in the western Balkan<br />

zoogeographic region (B ă n ă rescu, 1992), and drains in to the Adriatic Sea basin.


75<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

It starts near Nikšić, under the Planinica hill with a mean discharge in its mouth of 74<br />

m 3 s -1 , (M a r t i n o v i ć -Vitanović & Kalifatić , 1995), flows eastwards for 86 km<br />

until it confluxes into the Morača River near Podgorica.<br />

Odonata specimens were collected with aerial nets. Specimens were put into<br />

envelopes and transported to the lab. All the specimens were deposited in the<br />

collection of the first author. B e s c h o v s k i (1994) were used for identification of the<br />

specimens. Unless stated otherwise, all material has been collected by the first<br />

author. The composition of the material is given as: (males/females/larvae).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Subordo Zygoptera<br />

Family Calopterygidae<br />

Calopteryx virgo (Linneaus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0); Slap Zete, 9<br />

March 2007 (0/0/2), 16 April 2007 (0/0/1), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1);<br />

Danilovgrad, 21 July 2007 (2/1/0), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Martinići, 18 May 2007<br />

(0/0/3), 21 June 2007 (3/2/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/2/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2), 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Glava<br />

Zete, 9 March 2007 (0/0/2), Vidrovan.13 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Calopteryx splendens ( Harris, 1782)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 9 March 2007 (0/0/1), 30 June 2007 (1/2/1); Danilovgrad, 21<br />

June 2007 (3/1/0); Martinići, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (2/0/0), 30 June 2007<br />

(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0), 26 August 2007 (1/1/3); Glava Zete, 21 June<br />

2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />

Family Platycnemidae<br />

Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići 13 July 2007 (2/2/1).<br />

Family Lestidae<br />

Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, source 14 July 2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Remarks: New for Monenegro.


76<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890<br />

Distribution: Holarctic.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, source, 14.07.2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />

Material: Studenci, 21.06.2007 (3/1/2); Danilovgrad, 26.08.2007 (1/1/0);<br />

Martinići, 21.07.2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18.05.2007 leg. Zeković (1/1/0);Tunjevo,<br />

30.06.2007 (1/1/0),<br />

Remarks: New for Montenegro.<br />

Family Coenagrionidae<br />

Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0);<br />

Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Tunjevo 30 June 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/0); Danilovgrad, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0), 30<br />

June 2007 (2/2/0); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />

(2/1/0); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/2/0); Glava Zete 13 July 2007 (2/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 5 May 2007 (2/2/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (3/2/0).<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 June 2007 (1/1/0); Dobro Polje, 26 August 2007 (1/1/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/0);<br />

Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />

Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean.<br />

Material: Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/2/0), 13 July 2007 leg.Zeković (1/1/0).


77<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Subordo Anisoptera<br />

Family Aeshnidae<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/1/0); Dobro Polje, 18 May 2007 leg.<br />

Zeković (0/0/1), 13 July 2007 (1/1/0).<br />

Remarks: New for Monenegro<br />

Aeshna cyanea (Müller, 1764)<br />

Distribution: Europe.<br />

Material: Vidrovan, izvor, 14 July 2007 (1/1/2).<br />

Family Libellulidae<br />

Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845)<br />

Distribution: East Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />

Dobro Polje, 30 June 2007 (1/2/2); Tunjevo, 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (2/1/0).<br />

Orthetrum cancellatum ( Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Martinići, 30 June 2007 leg. Zeković<br />

(1/1/2); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (1/0/0).<br />

Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/1/2); Martinići, 26 August 2007 (2/0/0).<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Europe<br />

Material: Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (4/2/4); Martinići, 21 July 2007 (3/0/0);<br />

Dobro Polje, 21 June 2007 (3/1/3); Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (3/2/0); Glava Zete, 9 March<br />

2007 leg. Zeković (0/0/4), 26 August 2007 (4/0/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Tunjevo, 13 July 2007 (2/0/0), 21 July 2007 (2/1/1).<br />

Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.


78<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/1); Slap Zete, 26<br />

August 2007 (2/0/0),<br />

Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840)<br />

Distribution: Palaearctic.<br />

Material: Studenci, 18 May 2007 (2/1/0); Slap Zete, 26 August 2007 (2/2/2);<br />

Danilovgrad 21 July 2007 (2/1/1), 26 August 2007 (2/0/0); Glava Zete, 5 May 2007<br />

leg.Zeković (2/0/0), 30 June 2007 (2/2/1); Vidrovan 14 July 2007 (1/0/0).<br />

Sympetrum sanquineum ( Müller, 1764)<br />

Distribution: Euro-mediterranean.<br />

Material: Martinići, 21 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Family Cordulegastridae<br />

Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843)<br />

Distribution: Mediterranean.<br />

Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (0/0/2), 5 May 2007 (0/0/1), 13 July 2007<br />

(2/1/0), 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0); Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (2/2/2),<br />

30 June 2007 (2/0/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />

Family Cordulidae<br />

Somatochlora metallica (Vander Linden, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />

Material: Slap Zete, 30 June 2007 (2/1/0), 13 July 2007 (2/1/0), 21 July 2007<br />

(2/0/0); Danilovgrad, 13 July 2007 leg. Zeković (2/3/0); Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007<br />

(2/0/0); Tunjevo, 30 June 2007 (2/1/1); Glava Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/2/0); Vidrovan,<br />

14July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

Family Gomphidae<br />

Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825)<br />

Distribution: Euro-siberian subregion.<br />

Material: Studenci, 30 June 2007 (3/3/4), Slap Zete, 21 June 2007 (2/1/3), 30<br />

June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/2/2); Danilovgrad, 30 June 2007 (2/0/0), Martinići, 21 June<br />

2007 (2/2/4), 26 August 2007 (0/1/0), Dobro Polje, 21 July 2007 (2/0/0), Tunjevo, 30<br />

June 2007 (1/0/0), 13 July 2007 (3/2/3), Glava Zete, 30 June 2007. (2/1/3), Vidrovan,<br />

14 July 2007 (3/1/2).<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: European subregion.


79<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Material: Studenci, 21 June 2007 (2/1/2); Slap Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/3/4); Dobro<br />

Polje, 5 May 2007 (1/0/0), 18 May 2007 (1/1/2), 21 June 2007 leg. Zeković (2/0/0);<br />

Tunjevo, 21 June 2007 (1/2/2); Glava Zete, 21 July 2007 (3/1/1); Vidrovan, 14 July<br />

2007 (1/1/2).<br />

Remarks: New for Montenegro<br />

Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

Distribution: Holomediterranean subregion.<br />

Material: Studenci, 16 April 2007 (2/0/0), 21 June 2007 (3/2/3); Tunjevo, 30 June<br />

2007 (1/1/3), 13 July 2007 (1/2/3); Glava Zete, 18 May 2007 (3/1/4), 21 June 2007<br />

(3/2/2); Vidrovan, 14 July 2007 (2/1/2).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In the freshwater habitats of the River Zeta 27 species of dragonflies (Odonata)<br />

belonging to 15 genera and 9 families were recorded at 8 sites. Of these, 3 species:<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) and Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />

(Linneus) are recorded from Montenegro for the first time.<br />

The total number of specimens of dragonflies collected on the River Zeta<br />

amounts to 486. Eight species are dominant (> 5% total abundance): Calopterix virgo<br />

(Linneus), C. splendens (Harris), Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys), Somatochlora<br />

metalica (Vander Linden), Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus), Gomphus vulgatisimus<br />

(Linneus), G. flavipes (Charpentier) and Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus). Six<br />

species are subdominant (abundance 5-2%): Lestes barbarus (Fabricius), Coenagrion<br />

ornatum (Sélys), C. hastulatum (Charpentier), C. puella (Linneus), Orthetrum anceps<br />

(Schneider), Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) and S. striolatum (Charpentier). The<br />

remaning 12 species have abundance less than


80<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table 1. Abundance of the collected species. D = dominant (> 5% total abundance), SD =<br />

subdominant (2-5% total abundance), R = rare (< 2% total abundance).<br />

Species<br />

Number of<br />

collected<br />

specimens<br />

Relative<br />

abundance<br />

%<br />

Dominancy<br />

1. Calopterix virgo (Linneus, 1758) 46 9.46% D<br />

2. Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) 34 6.99% D<br />

3. Lestes sponsa (Hensemann, 1823) 3 0.61% R<br />

4. Lestes dryas Kirby, 1890 2 0.41% R<br />

5. Lestes barbarus (Fabricius, 1798) 14 2.88% SD<br />

6. Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas, 1771) 4 0.82% R<br />

7. Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden, 1820) 8 1.64% R<br />

8. Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier, 1825) 9 1.85% R<br />

9. Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys, 1850) 24 4.93% SD<br />

10. Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier, 1840) 11 2.26% SD<br />

11. Coenagrion puella (Linneus, 1758) 13 2.67% SD<br />

12. Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier, 1840) 6 1.23% R<br />

13. Aeshna cyanea Müller, 1764 4 0.82% R<br />

14. Aeshna afinis Vander Linden, 1820 6 1.23% R<br />

15. Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys, 1843) 26 5.34% D<br />

16. Somatochlora metalica (Vander Linden,1825) 27 5.55% D<br />

17. Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus, 1758) 38 7.81% D<br />

18. Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus, 1758) 8 1.64% R<br />

19. Orthetrum anceps (Schneider, 1845) 15 3.08% S<br />

20. Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé, 1823) 7 1.44% R<br />

21. Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus, 1758) 6 1.23% R<br />

22. Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys, 1841) 17 3.49% SD<br />

23. Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier, 1840) 20 4.11% SD<br />

24. Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller, 1764) 5 1.02% R<br />

25. Gomphus vulgatisimus (Linneus, 1758) 36 7.4% D<br />

26. Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier, 1825) 56 11.1% D<br />

27. Onychogomphus forcipatus (Linneus, 1758) 41 8.43% D<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We are grateful to Branimir Gligorović and Igor Temelkovski<br />

for their logistic support.


81<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

APPENDIX 1. Photographs of the collected species.<br />

FIGURE 2.<br />

Calopteryx virgo ♀<br />

FIGURE 3.<br />

Calopteryx virgo ♂<br />

FIGURE 4.<br />

Calopteryx splendens ♂<br />

FIGURE 5.<br />

Calopteryx splendens ♀<br />

FIGURE 6.<br />

Lestes sponsa (Hensemann) ♂<br />

FIGURE 7.<br />

Lestes dryas Kirby ♂


82<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 8.<br />

Lestes barbarus (Fabricius) ♀<br />

FIGURE 9.<br />

Platycnemis pennipes (Pallas) ♂,♀<br />

FIGURE 10.<br />

Ischnura elegans (Vander Linden) ♂<br />

FIGURE 11.<br />

Ischnura pumilo (Charpentier) ♂,♀<br />

FIGURE 12.<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) juvenile ♀<br />

FIGURE 13.<br />

Coenagrion ornatum (Sélys) larvae


83<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 14.<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus) juvenile ♀<br />

FIGURE 15.<br />

Coenagrion puella (Linneus) ♂<br />

FIGURE 16.<br />

Coenagrion hastulatum (Charpentier) ♂<br />

FIGURE 17.<br />

Erythromma viridulum (Charpentier) ♂<br />

FIGURE 18.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♂<br />

FIGURE 19.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden ♀


84<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 20.<br />

Aeshna afinis Vander Linden larvae<br />

FIGURE 21.<br />

Aeshna cyanea larvae<br />

FIGURE 22.<br />

Aeshna cyanea ♂<br />

FIGURE 23.<br />

Aeshna cyanea ♀<br />

FIGURE 24.<br />

Orthetrum anceps (Schneider) ♀<br />

FIGURE 25.<br />

Orthetrum cancellatum (Linnaeus) ♀


85<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 26.<br />

Crocothemis erythraea (Brullé) ♂<br />

FIGURE 27.<br />

Sympetrum meridionale (Sélys) ♀<br />

FIGURE 28.<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♂<br />

FIGURE 29.<br />

Libelulla depressa (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 30.<br />

Sympetrum flaveolum (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 31.<br />

Sympetrum striolatum (Charpentier) ♂


86<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 32.<br />

Sympetrum sanquineum (Müller) ♂, ♀<br />

FIGURE 33.<br />

Cordulegaster bidentatus (Sélys) ♂<br />

FIGURE 34. Somatohlora<br />

metalica ♀ and ♂<br />

FIGURE 35.<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♀<br />

FIGURE 36.<br />

Gomphus vulgatissimus (Linnaeus) ♂


87<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

FIGURE 37.<br />

Onychogomphus forcipatus ♀<br />

FIGURE 38.<br />

Gomphus flavipes (Charpentier) ♂<br />

APPENDIX 2. Photographs of the sampling sites.<br />

FIGURE 39. The River Zeta – Studenci<br />

FIGURE 40. The River Zeta – Martinići<br />

FIGURE 41. The River Zeta – Danilovgrad<br />

FIGURE 42. The River Zeta – Slap Zete


88<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

FIGURE 43. The River Zeta – Dobro Polje<br />

FIGURE 44. The River Zeta – Tunjevo<br />

FIGURE 45. The River Zeta – Glava Zete<br />

FIGURE 46. The River Zeta – Vidrovan<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Adamović , Ž. 1949 : La liste des Odonates du Museum d'historie naturelle du Pays<br />

Serbe. - Glasnik Prirodnjačkog <strong>muzej</strong>a srpske zemlje, Beograd, 1–2: 275– 293.<br />

Adamović , Ž. 1996: Odonata taken and observed in Donji Ceklin, Montenegro. -<br />

Acta Entomologica Serbica, 1(1/2): 39-48.<br />

Adamović , Ž., Anđ us, Lj. & Mihajlović , L j . 1996: Odonata (Insecta) in:<br />

K a r a m a n , G. (Ed.). The Fauna of Durmitor. - The Montenegrin Academy of<br />

Sciences and Arts, 5, 43 – 80, Podgorica.<br />

B ă n ă r e s c u P. M. 1992: Zoogeography of Freshwaters. Vol. 2. Distribution and<br />

Dispersal of Freshwater Animals in North America and Eurasia. - AULA-Verlag,<br />

Wiesbaden, 517–1091.<br />

B e s c h o v s k i , V. 1994: Fauna Bulgarica. 23 Insecta, Odonata. - Bulg. Acad. Sci.,<br />

Sofia. 372pp.


89<br />

Gligorović & a l . A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRAGONFLIES . . .<br />

Martinović -Vitanović V. & Kalafatić V. 1995: Basic Hydrogeological<br />

Characteristics of Yugoslavian Freshwaters. In S t e v a n o v i ć V & V a s i ć V.<br />

(eds), Biodiverzitet Jugoslavije. - Ecolibri, Biološki Fakultet, Beograd, 97–115 (in<br />

Serbian).<br />

Received: 22.11.2007


90<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:91-100<br />

PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF<br />

THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE, SEMI-DESERT FIELD NEAR PODGORICA, MONTENEGRO<br />

Jelena N I K Č EVIĆ 1)<br />

1)<br />

Institute for the Protection of Nature of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Trg Bećir bega Osmanagića 16,<br />

Montenegro, E-mail: jnikcevic@cg.yu<br />

Key words:<br />

fauna,<br />

orthoptera,<br />

Ćemovsko polje field,<br />

semi-desert,<br />

ecological<br />

characteristics<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

Orthopteroid fauna of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />

field in Montenegro, is unknown and insufficiently studied.<br />

Owing to the investigations in period 2006-2007 in the area<br />

of Ćemovsko polje 37 species were determined and grouped<br />

in 4 superorders, 2 orders, 8 families and 27 genera. Data<br />

about ecological chara-cteristics, distribution, zoogeography<br />

and type of endemism for each species are presented.<br />

Ključne reči:<br />

fauna,<br />

pravokrilci,<br />

Ćemovsko polje,<br />

polupustinja,<br />

ekološke karakteristike<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRELIMINARNA ISTRAŽIVANJA FAUNE<br />

ORTOPTEROIDNIH INSEKATA POLUPUSTINJSKOG PODRUČJA<br />

ĆEMOVSKOG POLJA, CRNA GORA<br />

Fauna ortoptera Ćemovskog polja u Crnoj Gori je<br />

nepoznata i neistražena. Zahvaljujući istraživanjima u<br />

periodu 2006-2007. godine na prostoru Ćemovskog polja<br />

determinisano je 37 vrsta svrstanih u 4 nadreda, 2 reda, 8<br />

familija i 27 rodova. U radu su takodje dati podaci o<br />

distribuciji prisutnih vrsta, zoogeografskoj pripadnosti, tipu<br />

endemizma i ekološkim karakteristikama.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Throughout southern Europe, 14000 years ago the predominant picture was of<br />

an arid, semi-desert like steppe perhaps similar to the cool and arid mountain steppes<br />

found today in the Pamirs of southern Russia. A rapid warming and moistening of<br />

climate all across Europe occurred shortly before this time, with insect communities in


92<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

NW Europe suggesting conditions as warm as or warmer than the present-day for<br />

about the first 500 14C years (Atkinson et al. 1987). That sudden event was the basis<br />

for today’s picture of orthopteroid fauna and their evolution.<br />

The suddenness of this warming left ecosystems out of equilibrium. Trees had<br />

not yet had time to spread back over Europe, and a steppe cover predominated. The<br />

ice sheets in the north began to melt, but that had lasted for thousand years less than<br />

in the normal warm climate period. Some open woodland cover appeared in western<br />

Russia quite rapidly – within a few hundred years - after the initial warming events and<br />

woodland cover began increasing in the mountainous areas of southern Europe where<br />

trees had survived the glaciations.<br />

Data for orthoipteroid insects from region of Ćemovsko polje, a semi-desert<br />

field near Podgorica, Montenegro, are unknown in the literature. In course of<br />

investigation in period 2006-2007 of the orthopteroid fauna of this field, the detailed<br />

data about ecological characteristics and distribution in the semi-desert condition<br />

were established.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Material was collected during 2006/2007. Depending of differences in the<br />

taxonomic group sampling was realised by application of different methods (collecting<br />

with mowing and method with individual catching). Collected material was identified by<br />

using keys: H a r z , K. (1969): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague; H a r z , K.<br />

(1975): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague; H a r z , K., K a l t e nbach, A.<br />

(1976): The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague; U s , P. (1992): Favna<br />

Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti,<br />

Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Biološki Institut Jovana Hadžija, br. 12., Ljubljana.<br />

INVESTIGATED AREA<br />

The Ćemovsko semi-desert field is the part of Zeta valey in Montenegro. It is<br />

situated southeast of the capital town of Montenegro – Podgorica, between the two<br />

rivers Morača and Cijevna. The soil subastrate of this field is made of fluvioglacial<br />

sand. In the field there are hills: Ljubović (112m), Zelenika (166m) and Srpska Gora<br />

(95m). The climate is modified Mediterranean one. The greater part of the filed is used<br />

for human activities. Some parts of the field, nearer to Podgorica, are under the<br />

great antropogenic influences.


93<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

Picture 1. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />

Biogegrafic charactetistics of vegetation:<br />

This type of semi-desert habitats biogeograficaly belongs to Mediterranean<br />

semi-desert province (Š i m i ć , 1987 in L a k u š i ć , R.) with discontinueted areal from<br />

northwest Africa and Pirinei peninsula in the West, to Iran and Irak to the East. This<br />

type of geological soil, climate features and ecological factors are basic for xeroterm<br />

vegetation of semi-desert type. According to Černjavski (1949) this type of vegetation<br />

communities is predominated by Satureia subspicata-Poa bulbosa which spread all<br />

over the field.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The results of the investigations from 2006 and 200. at Ćemovsko polje field are<br />

presented on the Table 1. with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological<br />

characteristics. In accordance to these investigations 37 species belonging to 27<br />

genera classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families of Orthopteroidea have been<br />

determined.


94<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Table1: The preliminary list of orthopteroid fauna at the semi-desert field Ćemovsko<br />

polje, with remarks on distribution, endemic and ecological characteristics.<br />

EU: European, M: Mediterranean, MS: Mediterranean-submediterranean, OM:<br />

oromediterranean-mediterranean, TM: tropic-mediterranean, TPM: tropicpontomediterranean<br />

PM: pontomediterranean, E: endemic characteristics, EC: ecological characteristics<br />

EU M MS OM TM TPM PM E EC<br />

MANTODEA<br />

Mantidae<br />

1.Mantis religiosa<br />

Linneus, 1758<br />

Empusidae<br />

2.Empusa fasciata -<br />

Brulle 1836<br />

GRYLLOPTERA<br />

TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />

Tetigonidae<br />

3.Leptophyes<br />

punctatissima<br />

(Bosc, 1792)<br />

4.Phaneroptera<br />

nana<br />

Fieber, 1853<br />

5.Tylopsis liliifolia<br />

(Fabricius, 1973)<br />

6.Saga pedo<br />

(Pallas, 1771)<br />

7.Eupholidoptera<br />

chabrieri schmidti<br />

(Charpentier, 1825)<br />

8.Metrioptera<br />

ambitiosa<br />

Uvarov, 1923<br />

9.Metrioptera<br />

oblongicollis<br />

(Bruner, 1882)<br />

10.Pholidoptera<br />

dalmatica<br />

(Krauss, 1878)<br />

11.Pholidoptera<br />

littoralis<br />

(Fiaber, 1853)<br />

12.Pholidoptera<br />

maritima<br />

Zeuner, 1931<br />

13.Rhacocleis<br />

germanica (Herrich +<br />

+ phitophil, thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

phytophil<br />

silvicol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

arbusticol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

graminicol<br />

arbusticol<br />

+ praticol<br />

graminicolarbusticol<br />

pratinicol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ mediterran/<br />

submediterran<br />

silvicol, terricol<br />

arbusticol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ Balcan praticol higrophil<br />

phitophil<br />

+ Balcan praticol xeromesophil<br />

phitophil<br />

+ mediterran thermophil,<br />

xerophil,<br />

graminicol<br />

+ mediterran silvicol arbusticol<br />

thermophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

xerophil<br />

graminicol<br />

thermophil


95<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

Schaeffer, 1840)<br />

14.Ephgippiger<br />

ephippiger<br />

(Fiebig, 1784)<br />

GRYLLODEA<br />

Gryllidae<br />

15.Oecanthus<br />

pellucens<br />

(Scopoli) 1763<br />

Gryllotalpidae<br />

16.Gryllotalpa<br />

gryllotalpa<br />

(Linneus, 1758)<br />

ORTHOPTERA<br />

TETRIGODEA<br />

Tetrigidae<br />

17.Depressotetrix<br />

depressus<br />

Brisout, 1848<br />

ACRIDOIDEA<br />

Catantopidae<br />

18.Pezottetix<br />

giornae<br />

(Rossi, 1794)<br />

19.Anacridium<br />

aegyptum<br />

(Linneus 1764)<br />

20.Schistocerca<br />

gregaria<br />

(Forskal, 1775)<br />

21.Calliptamus<br />

italicus<br />

(Linneus 1758)<br />

Acrididae<br />

22.Acrida turrita<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

23.Acrida ungarica<br />

ssp. mediterranea<br />

(Herbst 1786)<br />

24.Acrotylus<br />

insubricus<br />

(Scopoli, 1786)?<br />

25.Acrotylus<br />

longipes<br />

(Charpentier,1845)<br />

+ pratinicol silvicol<br />

arbusticol<br />

+ silvicol herbicol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ geobiont<br />

higrophil mesophil<br />

+ xerophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

terricol<br />

herbicol<br />

+ arbusticolarboricol<br />

+ arbusticol<br />

arboricol<br />

+ thermophil,<br />

pratinicol<br />

tericol<br />

herbicol xerophil<br />

+ thermophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

graminicol<br />

+ thermophil<br />

hygrophil<br />

pratinicol<br />

graminicol<br />

+ pratinicol<br />

termophil<br />

tericol,<br />

psamophil<br />

xerophil<br />

+ Pratinicol<br />

Termophil<br />

tericol, psamophil,<br />

xerophil


96<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

26.Acrotylus<br />

patruelis (Herrisch-<br />

Schaeffer, 1838)<br />

27.Aiolopus<br />

strepens<br />

(Latreille) 1804<br />

28.Aiolopus<br />

thalassinum<br />

(Fabricius 1781)<br />

29.Oedipoda<br />

coerulescens<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758)<br />

30.Oedipoda<br />

germanica<br />

(Latreille, 1804)<br />

31.Oedipoda<br />

miniata<br />

(Pallas, 1771)<br />

32.Psophus<br />

stridulus<br />

(Linne, 1758)<br />

33.Sphingonotus<br />

coerulans<br />

(Linneus, 1767)<br />

34.Aeropus<br />

sibiricus<br />

(Linneus) 1767<br />

35.Dociostaurus<br />

genei<br />

(Ocskay) 1832<br />

36.Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanus<br />

(Thunberg 1815)<br />

37.Omocestus<br />

rufipes<br />

(Zetterstedt, 1821)<br />

+ pratinicol,<br />

thermophil, terricol,<br />

psamophil, xserophil<br />

+ thermophil,<br />

pratinicol,<br />

geophil,<br />

phitophilmesophil<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

geophilphitophil,<br />

higrophil<br />

+ pratinicolterricol,<br />

xerophil<br />

+ pratinicolterricol,<br />

litophil, xerophil<br />

+ xerophil, thermophil<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

terricol<br />

xerophil<br />

+ terricol,<br />

psamophil,xerophil<br />

+ hygrophilstenotherm,<br />

thermophob<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol<br />

+ thermophil, pratinicol,<br />

geophilphitophil<br />

+ xerophil<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Discussion in this chapter is about diversity and connections among the<br />

orthopteroid insects within different taxonomic groups. The zoogeographic<br />

characteristics of species are also presented, with remarks on endemic species.<br />

MANTODEA<br />

Fam- Mantidae - 1 species<br />

Mantis religiosa<br />

Fam. Empusidae – 1 species<br />

Empusa fasciata


97<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

TETTIGONIOIDEA<br />

Fam. Tettigonidae – 12 species<br />

Leptophyes punctatissima, Phaneroptera nana, Tylopsis liliifolia, Saga pedo,<br />

Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis,<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis, Pholidoptera maritima, Rhacocleis<br />

germanica , Ephgippiger ephippiger<br />

Fam. Gryllidae - 2 species<br />

Oecanthus pellucens, Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa<br />

TETRIGODEA<br />

Fam. Tetrigidae - 1 species<br />

Depressotetrix depressus<br />

ACRIDOIDEA<br />

Fam. Catantopidae - 4 species<br />

Pezottetix giornae, Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Calliptamus italicus<br />

Fam Acrididae – 16 species<br />

Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp. mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus, Acrotylus<br />

longipes, Acrotylus patruelis, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinum, Oedipoda<br />

coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Oedipoda miniata, Psophus stridulus,<br />

Sphingonotus coerulans, Aeropus sibiricus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanu, Omocestus rufipes<br />

The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), after which there<br />

follow the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to<br />

families with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae,<br />

Empusidae and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />

Zoogeographic analysis of faunistic elements:<br />

European species: 13<br />

Mantis religiosa, Leptophyes punctatissima, Saga pedo, Rhacocleis germanica,<br />

Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa, Pezottetix giornae, Aiolopus strepens, Aiolopus thalassinu,<br />

Oedipoda coerulescens, Oedipoda germanica, Psophus stridulus, Aeropus sibiricus,<br />

Omocestus rufipes<br />

Mediterranean species: 2<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica, Pholidoptera littoralis<br />

Mediterranean – submediterranean species: 11<br />

Empusa fasciata, Tylopsis liliifolia, Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti, Metrioptera<br />

ambitiosa, Metrioptera oblongicollis, Pholidoptera maritima, Oecanthus pellucens,<br />

Depressotetrix depressus, Calliptamus italicus, Dociostaurus genei, Dociostaurus<br />

marrocanus


98<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Picture 4. Ćemovsko field (photo:J. Nikčević)<br />

Oromediterranean-mediterranean species: - no data<br />

Tropic-mediterranean species: 2<br />

Acrotylus patruelis, Sphingonotus coerulans<br />

Tropicpontomediterranean species: 5<br />

Anacridium aegyptum, Schistocerca gregaria, Acrida turrita, Acrida ungarica ssp.<br />

mediterranea, Acrotylus insubricus<br />

Pontomediterranean species: 4<br />

Phaneroptera nana, Ephgippiger ephippiger, Acrotylus longipes, Oedipoda miniata<br />

Endemic species: 5<br />

Balcan endemic species: 2<br />

Metrioptera ambitiosa , Metrioptera oblongicollis<br />

Mediterranean endemic species: 2<br />

Pholidoptera dalmatica , Pholidoptera littoralis<br />

Mediteranean-submediterranean species: 1<br />

Eupholidoptera chabrieri schmidti


99<br />

Nikčević: PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS OF ORTHOPTEROID FAUNA OF THE ĆEMOVSKO POLJE . . .<br />

The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />

followed by 11 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />

belongs to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution and four species to<br />

pontomediterranean species. The lowest number (2) of species are those with<br />

mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. There are no available<br />

data for oromediterranean-mediterranean species distribution.<br />

There are 5 endemic species with Balkan endemic type and 2 species with<br />

Mediterranean endemic type and 1 species of Mediterranean-submediterranean type<br />

of endemism.<br />

In this discussion we can see that the greatest number of species have<br />

thermophil, xerophil, graminicol ecological characteristics.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

During the investigation of ortopteroid insects 37 species belonging to 27 genera<br />

classified into 4 superordo, 2 ordo and 7 families were determined from collected<br />

material. The largest diversity of species belongs to family Acrididae (16), followed by<br />

the diversity of family Tettigonidae (12). The other types of species belong to families<br />

with smaller diversity (Catantopidae 4, Gryllidae 2, and families Mantidae, Empusidae<br />

and Tetrigidae with 1 species).<br />

The greatest number of species (13) belongs to European type of distribution,<br />

then follow 11 species of mediterranean-submediterranean distribution. Five species<br />

belong to tropic-pontomediterranean zoogeographic distribution, 4 species to<br />

pontomediterranean ones. The lowest number (2) of species belongs to species with<br />

mediterranean and tropic-mediterranean type of distribution. For oromediterraneanmediterranean<br />

species there are no data so far.<br />

We can see that the greatest number of species have thermophil, xerophil,<br />

graminicol ecological characteristics in every type of taxonomical belonging.<br />

In Ćemovsko polje filed, according to this investigation (in literature there are no<br />

data about orthopteroid fauna on that field), the diversity of orthopteroid fauna is<br />

relatively small owing to a low diversity of vegetation cover, but abounding in relict<br />

and endemic species and species with low number specimens. Last characteristic is<br />

present in some rare taxa. This „small number“of orthopteroid insects has an origin in<br />

still insufficiently studied conditions in the history of orthopteroid evolution for that<br />

area. Some species and some habitats were on the same place at the same time with<br />

different ecological characteristics. Vegetation communities were displaced from one<br />

type to the other, opposite to the natural way of evolution of origin and succession.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

A D A M S , J.: Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak<br />

Ridge, TN 37831, USA<br />

Č E J C H A N, A. 1984: Catalogue of the Orthopteroid Insects of Montenegro - Acta<br />

faunistica entomologica musei nationalis Pragae sv. XVII: 9-22, Pragae.


100<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Č ERNJAVSKI, P., GREBENŠČ IKOV, O. & PAVLOVIĆ , Z. 1949: O flori i<br />

vegetaciji Skadarskog područja. - Glasn. Prir. Muz. Srpske Zemlje, Ser. B, Biol.<br />

Nauke 1-2: 4-91. Beograd.<br />

H A R Z, K. 1969: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. I. The Hague.<br />

H A R Z, K. 1975: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. II. The Hague<br />

H A R Z, K., KALTENBACH, A. 1976: The Orthoptera of Europe. Vol. III. The Hague.<br />

I N G R I S C H, S., KÖEHLER, G. 1998: Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas, Die Neue<br />

Brehm-Bucherei Bd.629: 27-41, Westarp Wissenchaften - Magdeburg.<br />

ŠIMIĆ , S. 1987: Syrphidae (Insecta, Diptera), Biogeografska i ekološka analiza<br />

faune osolikih muva Durmitora sa osvrtom na faunu osolikih muva <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>,<br />

Fauna Durmitora Sv. 2., CANU, Posebna izdanja, knj. 21, Odeljenje prirodnih<br />

nauka, knj. 13: 11-154, Titograd.<br />

U S , P. (1992): Favna Ortopteroidnih insektov Slovenije, Slovenska Akademija<br />

Znanosti in Umetnosti, Razred za prirodoslovne nauke, Dela 32, Biološki institut<br />

Jovana Hadžija, 12:61-285.<br />

Received: 25.10.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:101-109<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD Bufo bufo (Bufonidae) FROM<br />

BIOGRADSKO LAKE<br />

Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹, Tanja V U K O V ²<br />

¹ Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />

² Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Beograd, Srbija<br />

Key words:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

morphometric,<br />

qualitative characters,<br />

differences between<br />

the sexes.<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

In this paper we have presented the results of the<br />

analysis of morphological traits of Common Toad Bufo bufo<br />

population, from Biogradsko Lake. On the samples taken<br />

from this locality univariant and multivariant statistical<br />

analyses have been performed. A large number of<br />

morphometric and qualitative characters have been done for<br />

the first time. For morphometric characters basic parameters<br />

of descriptive statistics have been calculated, and for<br />

qualitative characters three qualitative traits with three<br />

conditions at four body regions of Common Toad separately<br />

by sexes, have been treated. As for the morphometric<br />

characters it has been established that there is a significant<br />

statistical difference between the sexes.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

morfometrijski,<br />

kvalitativni karakteri,<br />

razlike među<br />

polovima.<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE OBIČNE KRASTAVE ŽABE<br />

BUFO BUFO (BUFONIDAE) SA BIOGRADSKOG JEZERA<br />

U ovom radu su prikazani rezultati analize morfoloških<br />

odlika populacije krastave žabe Bufo bufo, sa Biogradskog<br />

jezera. Na uzorcima uzetim sa ovog lokaliteta urađene su<br />

univarijantne i multivarijantne statističke analize. Po prvi put<br />

je obrađen veliki broj morfometrijskih i kvalitativnih karaktera.<br />

Za morfometrijske karaktere izračunati su osnovni parametri<br />

deskriptivne statistike, a za kvalitativne karaktere obrađene<br />

su tri kvalitativne karakteristike sa tri stanja na četiri tjelesna<br />

regiona obične krastave žabe odvojeno po polovima. Što se<br />

tiče morfometrijskih karaktera utvrđena je statistički značajna<br />

razlika između polova.


102<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Common Toad has a large distribution and popultes mainly the entire palearctic<br />

area. It populates almost the entire Europe, with the exception of far north, Ireland,<br />

Corsika, Sardinia, Balear's Islands, Malta, Crete, as well as some smaller<br />

islands (B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). It also populates the northwestern Africa<br />

(P a s t e u r and B o n s , 1959). Although common at lower altitudes, it may also be<br />

found also on altitudes exceedeing 2500 m and on Iberian Peninsula (A n g e l , 1946;<br />

B o r k i n and V e i t h , 1997). In Montenegro it is mainly widely distributed. Owing to<br />

wide distribution, climatic conditions in various parts of areal of distribution are very<br />

different. Thus, in northern part of the areal the winters are long, cold and humid, so<br />

that the period favorable for growth is rather short (J o h a n n e s s e n , 1970). On<br />

higher altitudes the conditions are even more extreme. On the other hand, southern<br />

populations of this species are exposed to much more favorable conditions of outer<br />

environment; therefore the period favorable for growth is much longer.<br />

Species Bufo bufo is a polytypic one. From the scope of this species a taxon<br />

from the Far East has been separated on the level of species Bufo gargarizans<br />

(A n a n j e v a et al. 1998, K u z m i n 1999a, 1999b), and the character of polytype is<br />

determined to it in addition to nominotype subspecies three other ones B. b.<br />

grediscola, B. b. verrucosissimus, B. b. spinosus. If we recognize the fact that<br />

Caucasus Toad (Bufo verrucosissimus) is a separate species (e.g. O r l o v a &<br />

T u n i y e v 1989, A n a n j e v a et al. 1998), than the taxonomic differentiation in scope<br />

of Common Toad is even more limited. Nominotype subspecies is the most widely<br />

distributed (Northern and Southern Europe). The two first subspecies have a limited<br />

geographical area (mountains Gredos and Caucasus), nominotype subspecies is the<br />

most widely distributed (Northern and Central Europe), whereas the areal of<br />

subspecies B. b. spinosus is limited to the region of Mediterranean (northwestern<br />

parts of Africa, southeast Europe, southern Switzerland, Italy as well as the southern<br />

parts of France and Spain).<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

A total of 41 specimens has been analyzed, 26 males and 15 females. The<br />

largest part of the material has been collected in mating period. The material has<br />

mainly been manually collected and meredov (a net with a handle) has also been<br />

used.<br />

The samples belong to herpetological collection of the Natural History Museum<br />

of Montenegro; they are kept in 70 % alcohole.<br />

Morphometric analysis has been done on 21 traits which determine size and<br />

form of body and head of tailless amphibians. Measured traits are: L – longthe of body


103<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

from the top of head to the opening of the cloaca; Lpa – length of front exstremity; F –<br />

length of femur measured fromxthe opening of cloaca to knee joint; T – lengthj of<br />

tibiofibula from knee joint to tibiotarsal joint; P – distance from tibiotarsal joint to the<br />

tip of the longest finger (IV); n – length of metatarsus from the internal metatarsal<br />

ridgelet to the tip of the longest finger (IV); DpPa – length of the first finger off front<br />

exstremity; DpPp – length of the first finger of back extremity; Cint – the biggest<br />

length of the internal metatarsal ridgelet; Lc – length of head from the top of head to<br />

jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between the jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />

space between the internal edges of eye lids; Lc – lengh of head from the top of head<br />

to jaw joint; Ltc – width of head measured between jaw joints; Spp – betweeneyes<br />

space between the internal edges of eye lids; Spi – distance betwnn the outer nasal<br />

openings; Spcr – distance between front angles of eye openings; Lo – the largest<br />

length of eyeball; Ltp – the largest width of upper eye lid; Dro – distance from the top<br />

of head to the eye edge; Dno- distance of nasal opening from eye; Lh - length of<br />

cutaneous folds on heels; Lg - length of partoid salivary glands; Wg - width of<br />

salivary glands and weight.<br />

Three qualitative traits (Table 1) with three conditions on four body regions of<br />

toad: head part - dorsal side, dorsal part-dorsal side, head part -ventral side,<br />

abdominal part-ventral side.<br />

The conditions of qualitative traits have been coded in the following manner:<br />

Dorsal side – head part:<br />

1a - round warts, 1b - oval warts, 1c – kidneylike warts; 2a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 2b – protuberant warts, 2c – drawn in warts; 3a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 3b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 3c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;<br />

Dorsal side - dorsal part:<br />

4a - round warts, 4b - oval warts, 4c - kidneylike warts; 5a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 5b – protuberant warts, 5c – drawn in warts; 6a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 6b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 6c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;<br />

Ventral side – head part:<br />

7a - round warts, 7b - oval warts, 7c - kidneylike warts; 8a – very protuberant<br />

warts, 8b – protuberant warts, 8c – drawn in warts; 9a – very marked thornlike ends of<br />

warts; 9b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 9c – weakly marked thornlike<br />

ends of warts;


104<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Ventral side – abdominal part:<br />

10a - round warts, 10b - oval warts, 10c - kidneylike warts; 11a – very<br />

protuberant warts, 11b – protuberant warts, 11c – drawn in warts; 12a – very marked<br />

thornlike ends of warts; 12b – medium marked thornlike ends of warts; 12c – weakly<br />

marked thornlike ends of warts;<br />

Trait<br />

Warts shape<br />

Condition<br />

a) round<br />

b) oval<br />

c) reniform<br />

a)very convex<br />

Warts convexity<br />

b) convex<br />

c) inverted<br />

Prominence of thornlike<br />

warts endings<br />

a)very prominent<br />

b)averagely prominent<br />

c)weakly prominent<br />

Table 1. Analysed qualitatie traits in Bufo bufo<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Programme package STATISTICA (version 5.0) has been used for statistical<br />

analysis of data. For morphometric characters basic parameters of descriptive<br />

statistics have been separately calculated by genders: medium value ( x ), error of<br />

medium value (SE), standard deviation (SD), minimal (min) and maximal (max) values<br />

traits as well as coeficient of variation (CV). Analysis of sexual dimorphism has been<br />

performed on basic data (untransformed measures for every property), as well as on<br />

standardized residuals on eight traits (L, Lpa, F, T, P, n, Lc, Ltc). Regression of every<br />

property on body length (L) and use of standardized residuals from such a regression<br />

provides for the elimination of the impact of body size. Comparison of differences<br />

between the genders on basic data and on standardised residuals has been performed<br />

by the use of Tukey Test for the samples of uneven size.<br />

For the establishment of the significance of differences in respect of<br />

morphometric characters between the genders analysis of variance (ANOVA) has<br />

been used.<br />

Absolute and relative frequences (%) of the conditions of qualitative traits have<br />

been established. Qualitative traits have been analysed also through the<br />

corresponding analyses.


105<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Morphometric Characters<br />

Former data on values of morphometric characters of the species Bufo bufo are<br />

rather insufficient, or, some of them have been given only descriptively. That is why<br />

we have presented here the average values for a large number of characters that<br />

have not been previously analyzed and data about that do not exist in the literature.<br />

Basic parameters of morphometric characters descriptive statistics have been<br />

presented separately by sexes in the table 2. The smallest male of the sample of the<br />

population from Biogradsko Lake is 64.28, and the largest one 82.54 mm. The<br />

smallest female is 90.94 mm, and the largest 109.94 mm. Obtained values of body<br />

size of common toad from Biogradsko Lake are within the limits of the so far recorded<br />

values from other parts of areal of the species. (R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; A r n o l d and<br />

B u r t o n , 1978; Đ urović et al, 1979 etc).<br />

Sexual dimorphism has been analyzed in scope of population (localities) by<br />

application of Tukey test for samples of unequal size (“Unequal N HSD Tukey” test).<br />

This test has shown an expressed sexual dimorphism, where the females have higher<br />

average values of analyzed traits (Table 2). On basis of calculated parameters of<br />

descriptive statistics, separately by sexes and on basis of compared differences<br />

between the sexes, it has been established that the females have statistically higher<br />

values of all the characters, especially when the word is about L – body length, Lpa –<br />

length of front extremity, Lc – head length, Ltc – head width, Lg – length of salivary<br />

glands, weigth.<br />

With the population of Biogradsko Lake a great number of traits that have been<br />

demonstrating sexual dimorphism by the analysis of basic data where the size has<br />

been included, indicate the absence of sexual dimorphism for the largest number of<br />

characters when body size is excluded. The charactereistics which demonstrate the<br />

presence of sexual dimorphism also after the eliminating body size are T- length of<br />

tibiofibula and F – length of femur.<br />

Females are bigger than males in a large number of amphibian species<br />

(S h i n e , 1979; M i a u d et al., 1999; K h o n s u e et al.., 2001a, 2002b; M o n n e t and<br />

C h e r r y , 2002). That has been especially expressed with tailless amphibians in<br />

which females are bigger than males with 90% of species (S h i n e , 1979). This has<br />

also been established in this paper for studied population from Biogradsko Lake, as<br />

well as for the populations of the remaining part of the areal of distribution of this<br />

species (G i t t i n s et al., 1980; H e m e l a a r , 1988). The most common explanation of<br />

sexual dimorphism in body size is the advantge the females have in respect of eggs<br />

production (H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; C v e t k o v i ć et al., 2003). Namely,<br />

there is a positive correlation in many groups between body length and fecundity<br />

(C u m m i n s , 1986; B e r v e n , 1988; S i n s c h , 1998; G i b b o n s and M c C a r t h y ,<br />

1986). Assumption is that the selection, owing to a pointed correlation of body length


106<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Males Females sexual dimorphism<br />

Unequal N HSD (Tukey)<br />

Trait N Means SD SE Min Max N Means SD SE Min Max basic data/standard results<br />

L 26 73.71 4.1447 0.8128 64.28 82.54 15 100.64 5.0865 1.3133 90.94 109.94 ***<br />

Lpa 26 54.62 3.6473 0.7153 46.68 63.17 15 71.64 3.7562 0.9699 62.23 77.60 ***/ns<br />

F 26 32.53 3.1809 0.6238 25.32 38.86 15 40.67 4.9746 1.2844 31.98 46.95 ***/***<br />

T 26 24.10 2.0556 0.4031 20.52 27.25 15 28.82 2.4023 0.6203 25.55 34.46 ***/**<br />

P 26 36.65 4.2990 0.8431 27.03 42.91 15 42.98 2.8349 0.7320 37.06 47.03 **/ns<br />

n 26 51.90 4.6742 0.9167 43.30 60.54 15 62.52 4.8611 1.2551 56.26 72.83 ***/ns<br />

n-P 26 15.25 4.0443 0.7931 7.26 22.45 15 19.54 4.4970 1.1611 12.24 27.70 **<br />

DpPa 26 6.58 0.7584 0.1487 5.10 7.99 15 10.44 1.5234 0.3933 7.48 13.45 ***<br />

DpPp 26 6.74 0.8867 0.1739 5.29 8.63 15 8.46 1.2908 0.3333 5.85 10.79 ***<br />

Cint 26 4.53 0.5892 0.1155 3.37 5.56 15 6.34 0.9030 0.2331 4.51 7.74 ***<br />

Lc 26 17.50 1.1857 0.2325 14.28 19.46 15 24.69 1.6894 0.4362 22.04 27.83 ***/ns<br />

Ltc 26 22.41 1.5435 0.3027 19.67 24.73 15 31.19 2.0888 0.5393 28.09 36.37 ***/ns<br />

Spp 26 8.75 0.9524 0.1868 6.72 10.92 15 12.55 1.6316 0.4213 9.75 15.07 ***<br />

Spi 26 4.03 0.5097 0.1000 2.85 4.92 15 5.32 0.6099 0.1575 4.39 6.47 ***<br />

Spcr 26 7.49 0.5751 0.1128 6.28 8.62 15 11.82 0.9789 0.2528 10.28 14.21 ***<br />

Lo 26 6.25 0.6112 0.1199 4.95 7.43 15 9.28 0.7010 0.1810 7.61 10.27 ***<br />

Ltp 26 5.88 0.6321 0.1240 4.32 6.71 15 7.80 0.8845 0.2284 5.72 9.61 ***<br />

Dro 26 7.54 0.5957 0.1168 6.27 8.75 15 10.72 0.8648 0.2233 9.42 12.33 ***<br />

Dno 26 3.22 0.3864 0.0758 2.59 4.08 15 4.49 0.5739 0.1482 3.54 5.41 ***<br />

Lh 26 3.56 0.5723 0.1122 2.65 4.77 15 5.09 0.3795 0.0980 4.49 5.81 ***<br />

Lg 26 14.86 1.7528 0.3438 11.78 18.10 15 20.77 2.2236 0.5741 17.04 24.34 ***<br />

Wg 26 5.80 0.7387 0.1449 4.53 7.50 15 8.20 1.0614 0.2741 6.48 10.06 ***<br />

Weight 26 44.50 6.4576 1.2664 33.00 56.00 15 141.07 31.1367 8.0395 97.00 230.00 ***<br />

Table 2. Basic parameters of descriptive statistics of males and females of Biogradsko Lake and Tukey (HSD) test with gender factor


107<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

and fecundiy, favorises several values for body length of females. Greater eggs<br />

production on the other hand is explained by larger internal space for their storage,<br />

which larger females have (A n d e r s o n , 1994).<br />

The direction and magnitude of dimorphism in body length depend of various<br />

selective pressures the specimens of male and female sex are exposed to. D a r w i n<br />

(1871) assumed that sexual selection (though the competition among the specimens<br />

of the same sex or through an active selection of partner), may lead to sexual<br />

dimorphism. For instance, in species with pointed struggles among the males, males<br />

are frequently bigger than females.<br />

However, it is important to underline that common toad is one of rare secies in<br />

which males are a smaller sex, although there are struggles for females among them<br />

(H a l l i d a y and V e r r e l l , 1986; A r a k , 1988).<br />

Qualitative Analysis<br />

By a comparison of rerlative frequency of condition of monitored qualitative traits<br />

it has been noted that the same conditions, as a rule, have the greatest frequency<br />

both in the sample of males and in the sample of females (Tabele 3). The exception is<br />

the convexity of of warts in head region (in males the largest relative frequency have<br />

the warts which are indented, and with females warts are very protuberant) and the<br />

appearance of thornlike endings of ventral side of head region (most frequently weakly<br />

expressed in males and averagely expressed in females). The table of relative<br />

frequency of the conditions indicates that with females the variability of condition is<br />

higher than with males.<br />

By a correspondant analysis we have monitored the impact of qualitative traits<br />

on ordination of specimens of both sexes. The first corresponding axis has separated<br />

24.69% of variability, and the other one 17.03%. There is no clear sex separation<br />

(Figure 1). The sample of males indicates an uniformity in respect of monitored traits.<br />

Only one male has been separated during the second coresponding axis from the<br />

„main cloud” of male specimens on basis of two traits (11b and 12b) (Figure 2). One<br />

may observe a higher variability in scope of the sample of females. Traits 1c, 4b and<br />

5a separate two females along the first correspoding axis from other females, where it<br />

should be mentioned that these two traits as well as the traits 2a, 3b and 6b influence<br />

separating of females from males (Figures 1 and 2).<br />

The significance of this paper is in presenting for the first time the analysis of a<br />

larger number of morphometric and qualitative characters of population of the species<br />

Bufo bufo from Biogradsko Lake. These data make the grounds for further<br />

investigations of the populations of the species Bufo bufo both from Biogradsko Lake<br />

and the populations of this species from the territory of entire ontenegro.


108<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ANANJEVA, N., BORKIN, L., DAREVSKIJ, I. & ORLOV, N. 1998: Zemnovodnie i<br />

presmikajuščiesja. - Enciklopedija prirodi Rosii. ABF, Moskva, pp. 574.<br />

ARNOLD, E.N., BURTON, J.A. 1978: A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of<br />

Britain and Europe. – Collins, London<br />

ARAK, A. 1988: Sexual Dimorphism in Body Size: A Model and a Test. - Evolution 42:<br />

820-825.<br />

ANDERSON, S. 1994: Sexual Selection. - Princeton University Press, Princeton, New<br />

Jersey.<br />

BERVEN, K.A. 1988: Factors Affecting Variation in Reproductive Traits within a<br />

Population of Wood Frogs Rana sylvatica. - Copeia, 1988: 605-615.<br />

BORKIN, L.J., VEITH, M.1997: Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758). In: GASC, J. P., GABELA,<br />

A., CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIĆ, J., DOLMEN, D.,GROSSENBACHER, K.,<br />

HAFFNER, P., LESCURE, J., MARTENS, H., MARTINEZ RICA, J.P., MAURIN,<br />

J., OLIVIERA, M.E., SOFIANIDOU, T.S., VEITH, M., ZUIDEREWIJK, A. (eds),<br />

1997. Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe. Pp. 118-119. Societas<br />

Europaea Herpetologica & Muséum National d'Historie Naturelle (IEGB/SPN),<br />

Paris.<br />

CVETKOVIĆ, D., ALEKSIĆ, I., CRNOBRNJA – ISAILOVIĆ, J. 2003: Reproductive<br />

Traits in Common Toad Bufo bufo from the Vicinity of Belgrade. - Archives of<br />

Biological Sciences, Belgrade 55: 25P-26P.<br />

CUMMINS, C.P. 1986: Temporal and Spatial Variation in Egg size and Fecundity in<br />

Rana temporaria. - Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 303 – 316.<br />

DARWIN, C. 1871: The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. – Murray,<br />

London.<br />

ĐUROVIĆ, E., VUKOVIĆ, T., POCRNJIĆ, Z. 1979: Vodozemci Bosne i Hercegovine. -<br />

Zemaljski <strong>muzej</strong> BiH, Sarajevo.<br />

GITTINS, S.P., PARKER, A.G., SLATER, F.M. 1980: Population Traits of the Common<br />

Toad (Bufo bufo) Visiting a Breeding Site in mid- Wales. - Journal of Animal<br />

Ecology, 49: 161-173.<br />

HALLIDAY, T.R., VERRELL, P.A. 1986: Sexual Selection and Body Size in<br />

Amphibians. - Herpetological Journal, 1: 86 – 92.<br />

HEMELAAR, A.S.M. 1988: Age, Growth and other Population Traits of Bufo bufo from<br />

Different Latitudes and Altitudes. - Journal of Herpetology, 22: 369-388.<br />

JOHANNESSEN, T.W. 1970: The Climate of Scandinavia. In: C. C. Wallen (ed), World<br />

KUZMIN, S.L. 1999a. Zemnovodnie bivšego SSSR. Tovariščestvo naučnih izdanij<br />

KMK, Moskva.<br />

KUZMIN, S.L. 1999b: The Amphibians of the former Soviet Union. Vol. I. - Pensoft,<br />

Sofia/Moscow.


109<br />

Čađenović & Vukov: MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF COMMON TOAD BUFO BUFO . . .<br />

MIAUD, C., GUYETANT, R., ELMBERG, J. 1999: Variations in Life-history Traits in the<br />

Common Frog Rana temporaria (Amphibia: Anura): a Literature Review and New<br />

Data from the French Alps. - Journal of Zoology, 249: 61-73.<br />

MONNET, J. M., CHERRY, M. 2002: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Anurans. -<br />

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 269:<br />

2301 – 2307.<br />

ORLOVA, V.F. & TUNIYEV, B.S. 1989: On the Taxonomy of the Caucasian Common<br />

Toads Belonging to the Group Bufo bufo verrucosissimus (Pallas) (Amphibia,<br />

Anura, Bufonidae). - Biol. MOIP, Otd. biol., 94 (3): 13-24.<br />

PASTEUR, G. & BONS, J. (1959): Les Batraciens du Maroc. - Travaux de l'Institut<br />

Scientifique Cherifien, Serie Zoologique No 17, pp. 240. Rabat.<br />

RADOVANOVIĆ, M. 1951. Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd.<br />

SINSCH, U. 1998. Biologie und Okologie der Kreuzkrote (Bufo calamita). - Laurenti,<br />

Bochum.<br />

SHINE, R. 1979. Sexual Selection and Sexual Dimorphism in the Amphibia. – Copeia,<br />

2: 297 – 306.<br />

Received: 20.10.2007.


110<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:111-114<br />

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES Bufo<br />

bufo IN MONTENEGRO<br />

Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ ¹<br />

¹Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Podgorica, Crna Gora, E-mail: lazo@cg.yu<br />

Key words:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

distribution,<br />

Montenegro<br />

SYNOPSIS<br />

During the herpetological investigations in period 2001-2004<br />

a voluminous material was collected. On various localities in<br />

Montenegro we have collected the species Bufo bufo (Common<br />

Toad), for which there are no relevant literature data for the territory<br />

of Montenegro. This taxon is only reported for Bukumirsko jezero<br />

(lake) by prof. Radovanović (1951) za Durmitor, Skadarsko jezero,<br />

Lovćen, Biogradska gora (Džukić, 1991; 1995).<br />

A list of localities on which Common Toad has been<br />

collected as well asd UTM map with marked localities have been<br />

presented in the paper.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Bufo bufo,<br />

rasprostranjenje,<br />

Crna Gora<br />

SINOPSIS<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU RASPROSTRANJENJA<br />

VRSTE Bufo bufo (Linnaeus, 1758) u CRNOJ GORI<br />

Tokom herpetoloških istraživanja u periodu od 2001-2004.<br />

godine sakupljen je obiman materijal. Na različitim lokalitetima u<br />

Crnoj Gori sakupili smo vrstu Bufo bufo (krastavu žabu), za koju ne<br />

postoje relevantni podaci u literaturi za teritoriju <strong>Crne</strong> <strong>Gore</strong>. Ovaj<br />

takson navodi se jedino za Bukumirsko jezero od strane prof.<br />

Radovanovića (1951.)<br />

U radu je naveden spisak lokaliteta na kojima je sakupljena<br />

krastava žaba kao i UTM karta sa unešenim lokalitetima.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Bufo bufo is the biggest frog both in our region and in entire Europe<br />

(Radovanović , 1951). Adults of this species are to 15 cm long, with marked<br />

geographical variability in size. Females are significantly bigger than males. In course<br />

of multipliation migrations Bufo bufo covers large distances and it is considered tht it<br />

is one of the most migratory speces of tailless amphibians which may cover a<br />

distance up to 3000 m, what indicates an markedly dispersion potential of the


112<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

specimens of this species (S e m l i t c h and B o d i e , 2003). For the time being,<br />

common Common Toads are the only amphibians which, at the level of adult<br />

specimens may also undertake vertical migrations ofseveral hundreds meters<br />

(S z t a t e c s n y and S c h a b e t s b e r g e r , 2005).<br />

LIST OF LOCALITIES ON WHICH COMMON TOAD HAS BEEN RECORDED<br />

1. Skadar Lake CM 5.7<br />

2. The Crnojevića River CM 3.9<br />

3. Lješanska nahija CM 4.9<br />

4. Velje Brdo CN 5.0<br />

5. Kuči CN 7.0<br />

6. Piperi CN 5.1<br />

7. Bjelopavlići CN 4.1<br />

8. Prekornica CN 5.3<br />

9. Mateševo CN 7.3<br />

10. Biogradsko Lake CN 8.4<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Field investigations have been discontinued, as they mainly depended on<br />

weather conditions.<br />

The greatest part of the materiala has mainly been collected in mating period<br />

since at that time a large number of specimens gather at one spot imediately after the<br />

rain, or when the humidity is high. Material has mainly been collected by hand and a<br />

meredov (a net with a handle).<br />

This material has been subjected to morphometric analyses which will be<br />

described in some other paper.<br />

The material has been deposited in herpetological collection of the Natural<br />

History Museum in Podgorici and it is kept in 70% alcohol.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

So far there have been no relevan data in the literature about the distribution<br />

of this species on the territory of Montenegro. This taxon is reported only for<br />

Bukumirsko Lake by R a d o v a n o v i ć (1951). On basis of the list of localities we may<br />

state that this species is widely distibuted on the territory of Montenegro, but it is also<br />

endangered.


113<br />

Čađenović: A CONTRIBUTION TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRIBUTION . . .<br />

C M 0 9<br />

BP<br />

CP<br />

DP<br />

BN<br />

CN<br />

DN<br />

BM<br />

CM<br />

DM


114<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

DžUKIĆ , G. 1991: Vodozemci i gmizavci. – Građa za faunu vodozemaca i<br />

gmizavaca Durmitora. In: Nonveiller, G. (ed.) Fauna Durmitora. CANU, Posebna<br />

izdanja 24, Odjeljenje prir. Nauka 15, Sveska 4: 9-78.<br />

DžUKIĆ , G., V U Č KOVIĆ , M., N I K Č EVIĆ , J., M A R I Ć , D., V I Z I , O. 1995:<br />

Revizija bazne studije za prostorni plan. Bazna studija "Flora i Fauna". -<br />

Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode, Podgorica.<br />

RADOVANOVIĆ , M. 1951: Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd: 46-48.<br />

S E M L I T S C H , R.D., B O D I E , J.R. 2003: Biological criteria for buffer zones around<br />

wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. - Conservation<br />

Biology, 17: 1219-1228.<br />

S Z T A T E C S N Y , M., S C H A B E T S B E R G E R , R. 2005: Into thin air: vertical<br />

migration, body condition, and quality of terrestrial habitats of alpine common<br />

toads, Bufo bufo. - Cannadian Journal of Zoology, 83: 788-796.<br />

Received: 20.10.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:115-122<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE MOSOR<br />

ROCK LIZARD (Dinarolacerta mosorensis KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA:<br />

LACERTIDAE) FROM LOVĆEN MOUNTAIN (MONTENEGRO)<br />

Lidija P O L O V I Ć 1 , Katarina LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ 2<br />

1<br />

The Natural History Museum of Montenegro, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, e-mail: lidijapolo@cg.yu<br />

2<br />

Department of Evolutionary Biology, Institute for Biological Research „Siniša Stanković“, 11060<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Key words:<br />

Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis,<br />

morphological<br />

characteristics<br />

Synopsis<br />

External morphological traits of the Mosor rock lizard,<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Lovćen<br />

mountain (Montenegro) were examined. The results of<br />

Descriptive statistics for 14 morphometric, 21 meristic and<br />

percentages of states for eight qualitative traits were<br />

presented. Results are discussed in comparison with the<br />

literature data for other populations.<br />

Ključne riječi:<br />

Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis,<br />

morfološke<br />

karakteristike<br />

Sinopsis<br />

MORFOLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE POPULACIJE<br />

MOSORSKOG GUŠTERA (DINAROLACERTA MOSORENSIS<br />

KOLOMBATOVIĆ, 1886) (SQUAMATA: LACERTIDAE) SA<br />

PLANINE LOVĆEN, CRNA GORA<br />

U ovom radu analizirane su spoljašnje morfološke<br />

odlike populacije mosorskog guštera Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) sa planine Lovćen.<br />

Predstavljeni su rezultati deskriptivne statističke analize 14<br />

morfometrijskih, 21 merističkog i procentualna zastupljenost<br />

stanja osam kvalitativnih karaktera. Rezultati su upoređeni sa<br />

postojećim literaturnim podacima za ostale populacije ove<br />

vrste.


116<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Mosor rock lizard Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović , 1886),<br />

previously Lacerta mosorensis (see A r n o l d et al., 2007) represents both a relict<br />

and a steno-endemic species of the Balkan Peninsula (e.g. C r n o b r nj a –<br />

Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997). Its distribution is restricted to the south-western<br />

Dinaric mountain karst in Croatia, Bosnia & Herzegovina and Montenegro, exposed to<br />

the influence of the Mediterranean climate. There, it is patchily distributed, restricted<br />

to altitudes ranging between 450 and 1900 m (Dž u k i ć, 1989; C r n o b r nj a –<br />

Isailović and Dž u k i ć, 1997).<br />

The Lovćen population of the Mosor rock lizard is located at the south-eastern<br />

boundary of the distribution range. Here it occupies altitudes from 1200 to 1350 m<br />

inhabiting the cliffs and blocks of rocks surrounded by subalpine beech forest (plant<br />

community Fagetum montenegrinum subalpinum) with whitebark pine (Pinus<br />

heldreichii) as the differential species (T o m i ć – S t a n k o v i ć, 1970;<br />

Ljubisavljević et al., in press).<br />

Up until very recently D. mosorensis was one of the least studied<br />

representatives of the European herpetofauna (Dž u k i ć, 1989; O d i e r n a and<br />

A r r i b a s , 2005). However, the latest studies have revealed substantial morphological<br />

and genetic differences among populations of the Mosor rock lizard (C a r r a n z a et<br />

al., 2004; Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., 2007) and certain peculiarities in life-history<br />

traits (Lj u b i s a v lj e v i ć et al., in press).<br />

Although specimens from the Lovćen population were included in some of these<br />

studies, complete descriptive data on morphological characters have not been<br />

published until now.<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorens-adult specimen


117<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Analyses were carried out on the samples collected from localities Ivanova<br />

korita (42° 22’ N, 18°50’ E) and Međuvršje (42°24’ N, 18°50’ E) in the Lovćen mt. A<br />

total of 22 adult males, 23 females, 2 immature males and 5 immature females were<br />

examined. Specimens preserved in 70% ethanol were from Dr Georg Džukić's<br />

Herpetological Collection of the Institute for Biological Research, Belgrade (Međuvršje<br />

locality), and the Herpetological Collection of the Natural History Museum of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica (Ivanova korita locality). Specimens were examined for the<br />

following characters:<br />

Morphometric characters: Tot – total length, Lcor – snout-vent length, Lcap –<br />

head length, Ltcap - head width, Altcap - head height, Lfo – mouth length, Ltfo –<br />

mouth width, Lpa – forelimb length, Lpp – hindlimb length, Ldg – length of fourth toe<br />

on hindlimb, Lpil – pileus length, Ltpil – pileus width, Doa – orbit to ear distance, Pap<br />

– distance between fore and hind limbs.<br />

Meristic characters included the numbers of: SOC – supraocular scales, CIL -<br />

supraciliary scales, GRA - supraciliary granules, POC – postocular scales, TMP –<br />

temporal scales, STM - supratemporal scales, PNS - postnasal scales, 1LO - first<br />

loreal scales, 2LO second loreal scales, PROC - praeocular scales, SLB- supralabial<br />

scales anterior to subocular, SUB - sublabial scales, SMX - submaxilar scales, GUL -<br />

gular scales along the throat midline, COL – large collar scales, VENT – inner ventral<br />

scales counted longitudinally, DOR – dorsal scales around mid-body, PAN – praeanal<br />

scales surrounding anteriorly the anal plate, FPO – femoral pores, FEM – femural<br />

scales, SDG – lamellar scales under the fourth toe.<br />

Qualitative characters: (I) masseteric plate: a—single, b—divided, c—indistinct.<br />

(II) row of supraciliary granules: a—complete; b—incomplete (included cases when<br />

only one granula was separated from the rest). (III) additional scale between the first<br />

postocular 1POC and the last supraocular 4SOC scale: a—present, b— absent. (IV)<br />

multiplication of supralabials anterior to subocular scale: a—by insertion of additional<br />

small scales, b—by vertical splitting of scales, c—state of four supralabials. (V) type<br />

of dorsal pattern: a—diffuse, scattered spots, b—diffuse, interconnected spots in more<br />

or less reticulate pattern, c—banded pattern, spots arranged in a single vertebral<br />

and/or two narrow juxtaposed paravertebral bands, d—banded pattern, broad<br />

vertebral band consisting of scattered spots, e—absent. (VI) spots of the dorsal<br />

pattern: a—large, b—medium, c—small, d—absent. (VII) areas of background color<br />

free of dark pattern: a—broad, b—narrow, c—absent. (VIII) lateral bands: a—distinct,<br />

b—indistinct. The band names of dorsal pattern were according to A r n o l d and<br />

B u r t o n (1978).<br />

Symetrical characters were taken from both sides of the body. Data processing<br />

concerned the mean of the right and left values for quantitative traits, while for<br />

qualitative traits a combination of both sides was used.<br />

The body and head dimensions were taken with digital callipers to the nearest<br />

0.01 mm. Scale counts were taken under a stereoscopic microscope. For<br />

morphometric and qualitative characters, statistical analyses included only mature


118<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

individuals, while for analysis of the scalation, adults and immature individuals were<br />

pooled.<br />

Descriptive statistics (mean, standard error, range) for quantitative traits, and<br />

percentages of states for each qualitative trait were calculated. Statistical analyses<br />

were carried out using the computer package Statistica (STATISTICA for Windows.<br />

StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Quantitative traits<br />

Descriptive statistics of morphometric and meristic characters of adult males and<br />

females are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Maximum total length recorded was 205 mm<br />

and 197 mm for males and females, respectively. These values are smaller than those<br />

previously reported for the species as a whole (up to 220 mm, B i s c h o f f, 1984),<br />

and Herzegovinian population (222 mm, V e i t h, 1991). However, it should be noted<br />

that due to the great number of regenerating individuals, we could analyse total length<br />

on a small sample. Our measures showed that snout-vent length (Lcor) values for<br />

females were between 56.3 – 70.7 mm ( x = 63.8 mm ± 0.8), and for males were<br />

between 59.5 – 71.1 mm ( x = 65.5 mm ± 0.7). While female data were mainly in<br />

accordance with literature data (57 - 64.4 - 68 mm, Bischoff, 1984), males showed<br />

greater mean Lcor than previously reported (51 – 62.3 - 68 mm Bischoff, 1984). No<br />

concrete literature data are available regarding the other morphometric characters<br />

here analysed.<br />

males<br />

females<br />

Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />

Tot 5 192.00 179.00 205.00 4.54 6 176.17 160.00 197.00 5.63<br />

Lcor 22 65.53 59.53 71.08 0.67 23 63.76 56.34 70.72 0.82<br />

Lcap 22 16.85 15.67 17.62 0.14 23 14.41 13.46 15.71 0.12<br />

Ltcap 22 10.37 9.03 11.68 0.15 23 8.79 7.80 9.74 0.10<br />

Altcap 22 6.75 5.54 8.33 0.16 23 5.49 5.02 6.06 0.07<br />

Lfo 22 12.77 11.62 13.59 0.12 23 11.07 10.35 12.05 0.10<br />

Ltfo 22 9.82 8.67 10.90 0.15 23 8.30 7.30 9.33 0.09<br />

Lpa 22 22.79 20.94 24.58 0.19 23 20.23 18.72 22.10 0.18<br />

Lpp 22 36.06 32.70 40.57 0.39 23 31.39 29.73 34.37 0.25<br />

Ldg 22 11.39 10.63 12.80 0.11 23 10.15 9.15 11.08 0.10<br />

Lpil 22 15.66 14.37 16.43 0.14 23 13.41 12.60 14.58 0.11<br />

Ltpil 22 6.85 6.30 7.30 0.06 23 6.01 5.50 6.60 0.06<br />

Doa 22 5.12 4.60 5.65 0.07 23 3.96 3.50 4.60 0.05<br />

Pap 22 29.01 25.85 31.96 0.36 23 32.16 25.82 38.24 0.63<br />

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of 14 morphometric characters of adult male and female<br />

Dinarolacerta mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm),<br />

range, standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.


119<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

Concerning meristic characters, the mean number of four supraocular scales<br />

and variation range of supraciliary scales were in agreement with literature data (CIL:<br />

5 – 8, Bischoff, 1984), while the number of supraciliary granules varied (especially in<br />

females) in a broader range than it was previously described for this species (GRA: 8<br />

– 12, Bischoff, 1984). The most frequently detected number of two postnasals (PNS)<br />

in our sample was in agreement with previous studies (M é h e l y, 1903;<br />

Radovanović , 1951; B i s c h o f f , 1984; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002; A r n o<br />

l d et al., 2007). The number of loreal (1LO, 2LO) and praeocular scales (PROC)<br />

varied from 1 – 2, although individuals with single-scale state were the most frequent<br />

in our sample. Previous literature data (B i s c h o f f, 1984) also showed single state<br />

of these scales as characteristic for this species. The usual number of four or five<br />

supralabial scales (SLB) in front of the subocular (with possibility of an asymmetric<br />

condition), as well as usual number of six sublabial (SUB) and submaxilar scales<br />

(SMX) reported for D. mosorensis by other authors (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć , 1951; B i s<br />

c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007) were in agreement with our results. However,<br />

the number of gular (GUL), dorsal (DOR) and subdigital scales (SDG) varied in<br />

broader range than previously recorded (GUL: 23 - 30; DOR: 36 - 40 - 45; SDG: 22 –<br />

23,4 - 25 in B i s c h o f f, 1984). The mean values and/or variation range for other<br />

analysed meristic characters were mainly in agreement with those previously reported<br />

for this species (e.g. R a d o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984).<br />

males<br />

females<br />

Character N Mean Min Max SE N Mean Min Max SE<br />

SOC 24 4.02 4.00 4.50 0.02 28 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00<br />

CIL 24 5.94 4.50 7.00 0.15 28 6.09 5.50 8.00 0.12<br />

GRA 24 9.17 7.00 11.50 0.25 28 8.65 5.00 12.00 0.29<br />

POC 24 3.81 2.50 4.00 0.08 28 3.52 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />

TMP 24 42.23 24.50 73.00 2.07 28 39.09 25.00 54.00 1.69<br />

STM 24 2.52 1.50 3.50 0.11 28 2.35 2.00 3.00 0.07<br />

PNS 24 1.88 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.96 1.50 2.00 0.03<br />

1LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.02 1.00 1.50 0.02<br />

2LO 24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.05<br />

PROC 24 1.13 1.00 2.00 0.06 28 1.07 1.00 2.00 0.04<br />

SLB 24 4.69 4.00 5.50 0.12 28 4.57 3.50 5.00 0.08<br />

SUB 24 6.02 4.50 7.00 0.11 28 6.04 5.00 7.00 0.10<br />

SMX 24 5.96 5.50 6.00 0.03 28 5.78 5.00 6.00 0.08<br />

GUL 24 25.88 20.00 32.00 0.52 28 24.48 19.00 28.00 0.40<br />

COL 24 8.83 6.00 10.00 0.21 28 8.67 7.00 11.00 0.22<br />

VENT 24 25.25 23.50 27.50 0.23 28 26.72 25.00 29.00 0.21<br />

DOR 24 39.06 33.00 44.00 0.66 28 38.46 30.50 43.00 0.59<br />

PAN 24 7.71 6.00 9.00 0.13 28 7.30 6.90 9.00 0.18<br />

FPO 24 18.35 16.50 21.00 0.23 28 17.19 12.00 20.50 0.32<br />

FEM 24 4.00 3.00 5.00 0.11 28 3.67 3.00 4.50 0.10<br />

SDG 24 22.29 20.00 24.50 0.24 28 21.96 20.00 25.50 0.26<br />

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of 21 meristic characters of adult male and female Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis of the Lovćen population studied. Sample size (N), mean value (in mm), range,<br />

standard error (SE). Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.


120<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

males<br />

(N = 22)<br />

females<br />

(N = 23)<br />

males<br />

(N = 22)<br />

females<br />

(N = 23)<br />

character % % character % %<br />

Iaa 68 65 VIa 73 83<br />

Iab 5 4 VIb 9 13<br />

Iac 9 22 VIc 9 4<br />

Ibb 0 0 VId 9 0<br />

Ibc 0 0 VIIa 5 4<br />

Icc 18 9 VIIb 0 9<br />

IIaa 68 57 VIIc 95 87<br />

IIab 14 13 VIIIa 5 35<br />

IIbb 18 30 VIIIb 95 65<br />

IIIaa 0 0<br />

IIIab 5 4<br />

IIIbb 95 96<br />

IVaa 0 0<br />

IVab 5 4<br />

IVac 5 9<br />

IVbb 41 35<br />

IVbc 23 26<br />

IVcc 27 26<br />

Va 23 46<br />

Vb 64 46<br />

Vc 5 13<br />

Vd 0 0<br />

Ve 9 0<br />

Table 3. Percentages of states of qualitative traits (in %) in Dinarolacerta mosorensis of<br />

the Lovć en population. For symmetrical traits combination of states for both body sides<br />

were given. Abbreviations of characters are given in “Material and Methods”.<br />

Qualitative traits<br />

Percentages of states for qualitative traits of adult males and females are<br />

presented in Table 3. In general, analysed individuals are characterised by the<br />

presence of single masseteric plate (Ia), complete row of supraciliary granules (IIa),<br />

absence of additional scale between the first postocular and the last supraocular<br />

scale (IIIb), and symmetrical multiplication of supralabials by vertical partition of<br />

scales (IVbb). Concerning the type of dorsal pattern, they are distinguished by<br />

predominance of diffuse type consisting of large size spots coupled with indistinct<br />

lateral bands (Va,b; VIa; VIIIb) and the absence of areas of background color free of<br />

dark pattern (VIIc). The diffuse pattern with interconnected spots in more or less<br />

reticulate pattern was predominant in males (Vb), while in females reticulate pattern<br />

(Vb) and scattered spots (Va) were present in the same percentage. A certain<br />

percentage of individuals of both sexes with symmetrical presence of an indistinct<br />

masseteric plate (Icc), and complete absence of dorsal pattern (males) (Ve, VId) were<br />

also recorded from Lovćen population.


121<br />

Polović, Ljubisavljević: MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A POPULATION OF THE . . .<br />

Concerning the qualitative traits, the prevalence of specimens with distinct<br />

masseteric plate, complete row of supraciliary granules and diffuse reticulate pattern<br />

found in this study were also considered characteristic for the Mosor rock lizard (R a d<br />

o v a n o v i ć, 1951; B i s c h o f f, 1984; A r n o l d et al., 2007). On the other hand,<br />

we rarely found unmarked (uniform) specimens, the feature frequently referred to D.<br />

mosorensis by other authors (T o m a s s i n i, 1889; B i s c h o f f, 1984; V e i t h,<br />

1991; A r n o l d and O v e n d e n, 2002).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Most of the values or percentages of occurrences obtained from the present<br />

analysis of external morphology of the Mosor rock lizard are in accordance (or within<br />

the variation range) with previous studies of the species. However, the number of<br />

supraciliary granules, supralabial, gular, dorsal and subdigital scales varied in<br />

somewhat broader range than it was previously reported for a species as a whole.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We are grateful to Georg Džukić for useful comments and making part of literature and<br />

sample collection available to us. We also thank Miloš Kalezić for helpful suggestions. Katarina<br />

Ljubisavljević was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science (grant no. 143052, “Patterns of<br />

amphibian and reptile diversity on the Balkan Peninsula”).<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., and J. A. B U R T O N. (1978). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />

Amphibians of Britain and Europe. - Harper Collins Publishers, London, UK, 1-272.<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., and D. O V E N D E N (2002). A Field Guide to the Reptiles and<br />

Amphibians of Britain and Europe. Second Edition. - HarperCollins Publishers, London,<br />

UK, 1-288.<br />

A R N O L D, E. N., A R R I B A S, O., and S. C A R R A N Z A (2007). Systematics of the<br />

Palaearctic and Oriental Lizard Tribe Lacertini (Squamata: Lacertidae: Lacertinae), with<br />

Descriptions of Eight New Genera. - Zootaxa 1430, 1-86.<br />

B I S C H O F F, W. (1984). Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886, Mosor-Eidechse, In:<br />

Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, 2-1, Echsen II, Lacerta (Ed. W. Böhme),<br />

290-300. Aula -Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.<br />

C A R R A N Z A, S., A R N O L D, E. N., and F. A M A T (2004). DNA Phylogeny of Lacerta<br />

(Iberolacerta) and other Lacertine Lizards (Reptilia:Lacertidae): Did Competition Cause<br />

Long-term Restriction?. - Systematics and Biodiversity 2, 57-77.<br />

C R N O B R N J A – I S A I L O V I Ć, J., and G. DŽ U K I Ć (1997). Lacerta mosorensis. In:<br />

Atlas of the Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe (Eds. J. P. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Crnobrnja-


122<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Isailović, D. Dolmen, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. P.<br />

Martýnez Rica, H. Maurin, M. E. Oliveira T. S. Sofianidou, M. Veith, and A. Zuiderwijk),<br />

250-251. Societas Europaea Herpetologica & Museum Nationall d’ Histoire Naturelle,<br />

Paris.<br />

DŽ U K I Ć, G. (1989). Remarks on Distribution and Protection Problems of the Mosor Rock<br />

Lizard, Lacerta mosorensis Kolombatović, 1886 (Reptilia, Lacertidae). - Biologia Gallohelenica<br />

15,185-190.<br />

LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., A R R I B A S, O., DŽ U K I Ć, G. and S. C A R R A N Z A<br />

(2007). Genetic and Morphological Differentiation of Mosor Rock Lizards, Dinarolacerta<br />

mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886), with the Description of a New Species from the<br />

Prokletije Mountain Massif (Montenegro) (Squamata: Lacertidae). - Zootaxa 1613,1-22.<br />

LJ U B I S A V LJ E V I Ć, K., P O L O V I Ć, L., T O M A Š E V I Ć – K O L A R O V, N.,<br />

DŽUKIĆ , G., and M. L. K A L E Z I Ć. Female Life-history Characteristics of the Mosor<br />

Rock Lizard, Dinarolacerta mosorensis (Kolombatović, 1886) from Montenegro<br />

(Squamata: Lacertidae). - J. Nat. Hist., in press.<br />

M É H E L Y, L. (1903). Lacerta mosorensis Kolomb., a Magyar királyság új gyikja,<br />

származástani kapcsolatában. - Állattani Közlemények, Budapest, 212 pp.<br />

O D I E R N A, G. and O. A R R I B A S (2005). The Karyology of ‘Lacerta’ mosorensis<br />

Kolombatovic, 1886, and Its Bearing on Phylogenetic Relationships to other European<br />

Mountain Lizards. - Ital. J. Zool. 72, 93-96.<br />

R A D O V A N O V I Ć, M. (1951). Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje. - Naučna knjiga,<br />

Beograd, 1-249.<br />

T O M A S S I N I, O. (1889). Crtice o životu gmazova koji žive u Bosni i Hercegovini. - Glasnik<br />

Zem. muz. u B. i H. 1, 46-60.<br />

T O M I Ć – S T A N K O V I Ć, K. (1970). Flora Lovćena I. - Zbornik Filozofskog Fakulteta u<br />

Prištini, 7,1-39.<br />

V E I T H, G. (1991). Die Reptilien Bosniens und der Herzegowina, teil I. Herpetozoa 3, 97-196.<br />

Received: 12. 11. 2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:123-129<br />

CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF BALKAN BRYOPHYTES:<br />

PHENOLIC ACIDS, FLAVONOIDS, TRITERPENES AND ALKALOIDS<br />

Nebojša J O C K O V I Ć 1 , Milica P A V L O V I Ć 1 , Marko SABOVLJEVIĆ 2, * and<br />

Nada K O V A Č EVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, 11000<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

2<br />

Institute of Botany and Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000<br />

Belgrade, Serbia<br />

* corresponding author: marko@worldpost.eu<br />

Key Words:<br />

Bryophyte chemistry,<br />

mosses,<br />

liverworts,<br />

phenolic acids,<br />

flavonoids,<br />

triterpenes,<br />

alkaloids<br />

Synopsis<br />

In this paper preliminary study of chemical constituents<br />

of three bryophyte species will be presented. Gametophytes<br />

of Polytrichum formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mosses) and<br />

Pellia endiviifolia (liverworth) have been collected in the<br />

native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia). TLC<br />

technique was applied for the preliminary study of petroleum<br />

ether and methanol extracts of three investigated species.<br />

According to this assay the presence of flavonoids (aglycones<br />

and glycosides) in all examined extracts was confirmed. In extracts<br />

of two species phenolic acids were detected. Besides, in the<br />

petroleum ether extract of all three species triterpenes were<br />

detected. Alkaloids were absent in the extracts of investigated<br />

bryophyte species.<br />

Ključne reči:<br />

hemija briofita,<br />

mahovine,<br />

jetrenjače,<br />

fenolne kiseline,<br />

flavonoidi,<br />

triterpeni,<br />

alkaloidi<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PRILOG POZNAVANJU HEMIJSKOG SASTAVA<br />

BALKANSKIH BRIOFITA: FENOLNE KISELINE,<br />

FLAVONOIDI, TRITERPENI I ALKALOIDI<br />

U ovom radu su dati preliminarni rezultati hemijskih<br />

konstituenata tri vrste briofita. Gametofiti Polytrichum<br />

formosum, Eurhynchium hians (mahovine) i Pellia endiviifolia<br />

(jetrenjača) su sakupljeni u prirodnim staništima okoline<br />

Valjeva (Zap. Srbija). Primenjena je TLC tehnika (tankoslojna<br />

hromatografija) u karakterisanju petroleimskog i metanolnog<br />

ekstrakta tri odabrane vrste.<br />

Prisustvo flavonoida (aglikona i glikozida) je potvrdjeno<br />

u svim analiziranim ekstraktima. U ekstraktima dve vrste<br />

detektovane su fenolne kiseline. Osim toga u petroleumskom<br />

ekstraktu sve tri vrste detektovani su triterpeni. Alkaloidi nisi<br />

pronadjeni kod ni jedne od tri istraživane vrste.


124<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Chemical studies of the bryophytes were neglected for a long time. They have<br />

now been shown to be a storehouse of naturally occurring materials, including some<br />

with novel chemical structures. Many of these materials display considerable<br />

biological activity. Investigations are hampered frequently by too small amounts of<br />

plant material. The resulting low yields of components are then generally inadequate<br />

to permit testing for biological activity. In vitro culture and appropriate chemical<br />

synthesis on a preparative scale are being undertaken to overcome this difficulty.<br />

However, bryophytes are the second biggest group of land plants after flowering<br />

plants and a source of chemically new and unknown compounds (e.g. A s a k a w a ,<br />

1994, 2001; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2001; Z i n s m e i s t e r & al., 2003.). Studies of<br />

chemical constituents of bryophytes are recently being performed, but still inadequate<br />

and neglected (A s a k a w a , 1995; T o y o t a & al., 1998; E d e l m a n n & al., 1998;<br />

S p e i c h e r & al., 2000, 2001; K l i n k & al., 2002; P o pper & Fry, 2003;<br />

H e r t e w i c h & al., 2003). These data help in systematic of hardly morphologically<br />

classified bryophytes (e.g. A s a k a w a , 2004). The data on biological activities of<br />

bryophyte extracts and/or chemical constituents are even hard to find (e.g. B a s i l e &<br />

al., 1998a, b, 1999; D u l g e r & al., 2005; S a b o v l j e v i ć & al., 2006,<br />

Sabovljević & Sabovljević , 2007)<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Three selected bryophyte species were used for phytochemical screening using<br />

TLC technique in order to show the presence of phenolic components, triterpenes and<br />

alkaloids in the their extracts. One liverwort and two mosses, Pellia endiviifolia<br />

(Dicks.) Dumort. (talous liverwort), Eurhynchium hians (Hedw.) Sande Lac.<br />

(pleurocarpous moss) and Polytrichum formosum Hedw. (acrocarpous moss) were<br />

analysed. Only the gametophytes were used for the chemical analyses. The<br />

specimens were collected in the native habitats in Petnica near Valjevo (W. Serbia) in<br />

August 2002, dried at the room temperature and stored in paper bags at 4°C till the<br />

beginning of the experiments.<br />

Preparation of extracts<br />

3.0 g of ground material was extracted by maceration with 30 ml of petroleum<br />

ether during 48h at room temperature, the extract was filtered and taken into dryness<br />

under reduced pressure. The dry residue was dissolved in 0.2 ml of petroleum ether.<br />

The same material used in previous step was left to dry, and extracted afterward with<br />

30 ml of methanol at the sonic bath during 30 minutes. The extract was filtered, the<br />

filtrate concentrated under reduced pressure and residue taken up in 0.2 ml of<br />

methanol.


125<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

Thin layer chromatography<br />

Thin layer chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 F 254 plates (DC<br />

Alufolien, Merck, Germany). The mobile phases used were: toluene-ethyl acetate<br />

(70:30, v/v) for flavonoid aglycones and triterpenes, ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial<br />

acetic acid-water (100:11:11:26, v/v/v/v) for phenolic acids and flavonoid glycosides<br />

and toluene-ethyl acetate-diethylamine (70:20:10, v/v/v) for alkaloids.<br />

Chromatograms were evaluated under UV light at 254 and 365 nm before and<br />

after spraying with NP-reagent for flavonoids, after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric<br />

acid reagent (VS) for triterpenes and Dragendorff reagent for alkaloids (W a g n e r &<br />

B l a d t , 1996).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The lipophilic compounds of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and<br />

Polytrichum formosum were isolated by petroleum ether and analysed by TLC in<br />

toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v). The chromatogram of petroleum ether extract of<br />

Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum showed the<br />

presence of several zones that correspond to flavonoid aglycones. They were<br />

detected by quenching fluorescence under UV-245 nm and by yellow fluorescence<br />

under UV light at 365 nm before and after spraying with NP-reagent.<br />

Comparing the positions of the zones of yellow fluorescence of all three<br />

bryophyte species on the chromatogram, it may be concluded that they contain some<br />

substances in common, having at least one substance present in all three petroleum<br />

ether extracts (Fig. 1)<br />

After developing the chromatogram in the mobile phase toluene-ethyl acetate<br />

(70:30, v/v), and spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid reagent triterpenes were shown<br />

as bluish-violet zones in the petroleum ether extracts of the examined bryophyte<br />

species (Fig. 2).<br />

The zones in extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum that are<br />

the closest to the start line might derive of the same compound. Similarly, the zones in<br />

Eurhynchium hians and Polytrichum formosum that are the closest to the solvent front<br />

are likely to represent the same substance. Regarding the zones at the half of the<br />

chromatogram, it may be concluded that petroleum ether extracts of all three<br />

bryophytes have one compound in common from triterpene group (Fig. 2).<br />

Methanolic extracts of Eurhynchium hians, Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum<br />

formosum were analysed by TLC in ethyl acetate-formic acid-glacial acetic acid-water<br />

(100:11:11:26, v/v/ v/v) as developing solvent. Flavonoid glycosides were detected in<br />

the chromatogram of methanol extracts of all three species as yellow fluorescing<br />

zones (UV-365 nm) before and after spraying with NP reagent. Chromatogram of<br />

methanol extracts of Pellia endiviifolia and Polytrichum formosum, near the solvent<br />

front showed the presence of blue fluorescing zones in UV light at 365 nm which<br />

correspond to the phenolic acids.


126<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Figure 1. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />

extracts of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />

endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />

obtained in toluene-ethylacetate (70:30, v/v),<br />

after spraying with NP reagent, under UV light<br />

at 365 nm.<br />

Figure 2. Chromatogram of petroleum ether<br />

extract of Eurhynchium hians (1), Pellia<br />

endiviifolia (2) and Polytrichum formosum (3),<br />

obtained in toluene-ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v),<br />

after spraying with vanillin-sulphuric acid<br />

reagent.


127<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

In order to screen methanolic extracts of analysed bryophyte species for<br />

presence of alkaloids, the chromatograms were developed in toluene-ethyl acetatediethylamine<br />

(70:20:10, v/v/v), and sprayed with Dragendorff reagent. Under given<br />

conditions of analysis, no orange-brown or brownish zones that correspond to alkaloid<br />

compounds could be noticed.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The study gives first insight into chemistry of bryophytes from the Balkan<br />

Peninsula. The compounds detected are already known among bryophytes. Generally,<br />

liverworts are more often used for chemical studies due to their oil bodies and so<br />

other species of Pellia was subject of chemical content studies. However, it remains<br />

unknown to the authors whether there have been previously chemical analyses of<br />

selected moss species for this study at all.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Many thanks to Dr. Rayna Natcheva (Sofia) for valuable comments to manuscript.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (1994): Highlights in Phytochemistry of Hepaticae - Biologically<br />

Active Terpenoids and Aromatic Compounds. - Pure and Applied Chemistry,<br />

66(10/11): 2193-2196.<br />

ASAKAWA Y. (1995): Chemical Constituents of the Bryophytes. In: Herz W., Kirby<br />

G. W., Moore R. W., Steglich W. and Tamm Ch. (Eds.), Progress in the<br />

Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, Vol 65. Springer Verlag, Wien, New<br />

York.<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (2001): Recent Advances in Phytochemistry of Bryophytesacetogenins,Terpenoids<br />

and Bis(bibenzyl)s from Selected Japanese, Taiwanese,<br />

New Zealand, Argentinean and European Lliverworts. - Phytochemistry 56: 297-<br />

312.<br />

ASAKAWA, Y. (2004): Chemosystematics of the Hepaticae. Phytochemistry, 65:<br />

623-669.<br />

BASILE, A., SORBO, S., GIORDANO, S., LAVITOLA, A. & CASTALDO-<br />

C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998a): Antibacterial Activity in Pleurochaete squarrosa<br />

extract. - International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 10: 169-172.


128<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., SORBO, S., VUOTTO, M. L., IELPO, M. T. L.<br />

& C A S T A L D O - C O B I A N C H I , R. (1998b): Antibiotic Effects of Lunularia<br />

cruciata (Bryophyta) Extract. - Pharmaceutical Biology, 36 (1): 25-28.<br />

BASILE, A., GIORDANO, S., LÓPEZ-SÁEZ, J. A., CASTALDO-<br />

C O B I A N C H I , R. (1999): Antibacterial Activity of Pure Flavonoids Isolated<br />

from Mosses. - Phytochemistry, 52: 1479-1482.<br />

DULGER, B., TONGUÇ-YAYINTAS, Ö. & GONUZ, A. 2005. Antimicrobial<br />

Activities of some Mosses from Turkey. - Fitoterapia, 76: 730-732.<br />

E D E L M A N N , H., N E I N H U I S , C., J A R V I S , M. C., E V A N S , B., F I S C H E R ,<br />

E. & B A R T H L O T T , W. (1998): Ultrastructure and Chemistry of the Cell Wall<br />

of the Moss Rhacocarpus purpurascens (Rhacocarpaceae): a Puzzling<br />

Architecture among Plants. - Planta, 206: 315-321.<br />

HERTEWICH U.M., ZAPP J. & BECKER H. (2003): Secondary Metabolites<br />

from the Liverwort Jamesoniella colorata. - Phytochemistry, 63 (2): 227-233.<br />

KLINK, J.W.VAN, ZAPP, J. & BECKER, H. (2002): Pinguisane-type<br />

Sesquiterpenes from the South American Liverwort Porella recurva (Taylor)<br />

Kuhnemann. - Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 57: 413-417.<br />

POPPER, Z. A. & FRY, S.C. (2003): Primary Cell Wall Composition of Bryophytes<br />

and Charophytes. - Annals of Botany, 91: 1-12.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , M., BIJELOVIĆ , A. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D. (2001): Bryophytes as<br />

a Potential Source of Medicinal Compounds. - Lekovite Sirovine, 21: 17 – 29.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , A., S O K O V I Ć , M., SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. & G R U B I Š I Ć , D.<br />

(2006): Antimicrobial Activity of Bryum argenteum. – Fitoterapia, 77: 144-145.<br />

SABOVLJEVIĆ , A. & SABOVLJEVIĆ , M. (2007): Bryophytes, a Source of Bioactive<br />

and New Compounds. – In: G o v i l , J. N. (ed.). Phytopharmacology and Therapeutic<br />

Values IV, the Series "Recent Progress in Medicinal Plants". Pp. 9-25.<br />

SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & H E I N Z L E , E. (2000): Rapid Detection<br />

of Multiple Chlorinated Bis(bibenzyls) in Bryophyte Crude Extracts Using Laser<br />

Desorption/ionization time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry. - Rapid Communications<br />

in Mass Spectrometry, 15 (2): 124 – 127.<br />

SPEICHER, A., HOLLEMEYER, K. & HEINZLE, E. (2001): Rapid Detection<br />

of Chlorinated Bisbenzyls in Bazzania trilobata Using MALDI-TOF Mass<br />

Spectrometry. – Phytochemistry, 57: 303-306.<br />

TOYOTA, M., MASUDA, K. & ASAKAWA, Y. (1998): Triterpenoid Constituents<br />

of the Moss Floribundaria aurea subsp. nipponica. - Phytochemistry, 48 (2): 297-<br />

299.<br />

W A G N E R , H. & B L A D T , S. (1996): Plant Drug Analysis, A Thin Layer<br />

Chromatography Atlas. Springer-Verlag Berlin.


129<br />

Jocković; Pavlović, Sabovljević, Kovačević: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS . .<br />

Z I N S M E I S T E R , H. D., B E C K E R , H. & E I C H E R , T. (2003): Bryophytes, a<br />

Source of Biologically Active, Naturally Occurring Material. - Angewandte<br />

Chemie, 30(2): 130-147.<br />

Received: 07.05.2007.


130<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:131-136<br />

PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IN DETECTION OF Chlamydia trachomatis AND THE<br />

OTHER METHODS – A COMPARATIVE SURVEY<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

Key words:<br />

PCR,<br />

Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis<br />

Klučne riječi:<br />

PCR,<br />

Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis<br />

Synopsis<br />

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods are the<br />

most advanced methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.<br />

There are various tests for detection of C. trachomatis. Many<br />

people, including specialists, do not know about reliability of tests<br />

and a comparative survey is welcome for overcoming this problem.<br />

Lack of sensitivity, specificity, or both, sensitivity and specificity, and<br />

some other disadvantages are common problems of those tests.<br />

However, polymerase chain reaction based methods do not have<br />

any of those common problems. They are the best methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis, which provide the most reliable results.<br />

Samples can be processed in just 5-6 hours. Disadvantage of PCR<br />

based methods is high price and high technology which makes them<br />

unavailable especially for people in developing countries.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

PCR (REAKCIJA POLIMERIZACIJE LANCA) U DETEKCIJI<br />

Chlamydia trachomatis I DRUGE METODE – UPOREDNA<br />

ISTRAŽIVANJA<br />

Metode bazirane na reakciji polimerizacije lanca (PCR) su<br />

najsavremenije metode za detekciju Chlamydia trachomatis. Postoje<br />

različiti testovi za detekciju C. trachomatis. Mnogi ljudi, uključujući<br />

specijaliste, nisu upoznati sa pouzdanošću testova, pa je jedan<br />

uporedni pregled važan za prevazilaženje ovog problema.<br />

Nedostatak osetljivosti, specifičnosti, ili oboje, osetljivosti i<br />

specifičnosti, i neke druge mane su česti problemi vezani za ove<br />

testove. Ipak, ni jedan od tih problema nije prisutan kod metoda<br />

baziranih na reakciji polimerizacije lanca. To su najbolje metode za<br />

detekciju C. trachomatis, koje daju najpouzdanije rezultate. Uzorci<br />

mogu biti obrađeni za samo 5-6 časova. Mana metoda baziranih na<br />

PCR-u je visoka cijena i visoka tehnologija koje su uzrok<br />

nedostupnosti metode, naročito za ljude u zemljama u razvoju.


132<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Diseases caused by bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis are pretty common<br />

worldwide. Actually, it is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases. In<br />

2005, according to statistics, 976,445 C. trachomatis diagnoses were reported (up<br />

from 929,462 in 2004) in the USA. However, most of C. trachomatis cases remain<br />

undiagnosed and it is estimated that there are 2.8 million new cases annually<br />

(Weinstock et al., 2004). Direct and indirect costs of cure of the disease exceed 2.4<br />

billion US dollars annually (Washington and Katz, 2000). Increase in cases is probably<br />

partially caused by advance in diagnostic laboratory tests. C. trachomatis is an<br />

intracellular bacterium and cannot be grown on agar plates. The infectious,<br />

extracellular form is an elementary body, typically 0.2-0.6 μm in diameter. Elementary<br />

bodies that have been endocytosed by eukaryotic cells typically remain in vacuolar<br />

inclusions and transform into reticulate bodies. Reticulate bodies range up to 1.5 μm.<br />

If untreated, chlamydial infections can progress to serious reproductive and other<br />

health problems with both short-term and long-term consequences. One of the main<br />

reasons that this disease is very common is the fact that it is mostly asymptomatic<br />

(Stamm, 1999). An asymptomatic disease can be diagnosed only by laboratory tests<br />

because of lack of symptoms. This is the reason that efficient cure and eradication of<br />

the disease is possible only if laboratory tests are highly reliable.<br />

A COMPARATIVE SURVEY OF METHODS<br />

There are several basic methods in laboratory detection of C. trachomatis.<br />

They have various specificities, and all of them (except PCR) have low sensitivity or<br />

cannot be efficiently applied for large scale analyses. In the case of asymptomatic<br />

diseases, which can be diagnosed only with a laboratory test, low sensitivity of the<br />

test is unacceptable. A survey of sensitivity of basic methods for detection of C.<br />

trachomatis is given in table 1 (Ossewaarde, 1995).<br />

DIAGNOSTIC METHOD<br />

SENSITIVITY (PERCENT)<br />

PCR 90-100%<br />

Cell Culture (McCoy) 60-80%<br />

Fluorescent Microscopy with Fluorescent 55-75%<br />

Antibodies<br />

ELISA 50-70%<br />

Hybridization with DNK Probes 50-70%<br />

Fast Tests 40-60%<br />

Table 1. Basic methods used in laboratory diagnostics of C. Trachomatis<br />

and their diagnostic sensitivity.


133<br />

Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />

Cell culture. Analysis in cell culture of McCoy cell line is one of methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis (Black, 1997). Its sensitivity is 60-80% and it takes 4-7<br />

days. Disadvantage of this method is that is not suitable for large scale application.<br />

Maintenance of cell culture is expensive and labor and time consuming. Sterile<br />

conditions are essential for cell culture and contamination is a very common problem<br />

especially in case of processing of many samples. Thus cell culture is not suitable for<br />

routine laboratory diagnostics. Actually, the relatively low sensitivity, long turnaround<br />

time, difficulties in standardization, labor intensity, technical complexity, stringent<br />

transport requirements, and relatively high cost are the primary disadvantages of cell<br />

culture isolation of C. trachomatis. This is the reason that this method has not been<br />

applied in large scale diagnostics.<br />

Fluorescent microscopy. Fluorescent microscopy can be with monoclonal and<br />

polyclonal antibodies. Sensitivity and specificity are 55-75% and 85-95% respectively.<br />

People who do analysis have to be well trained and the accuracy of results largely<br />

depends of their experience. If little amount of bacteria and large amount of cells and<br />

cell debris is present in the sample, result cannot be clear and depends of subjective<br />

opinion of person who does the test. This is the reason that this method largely<br />

depends of experience and degree of training, and sensitivity and specificity can be<br />

even lower in case of bad specialist. Actually, well trained specialists and with good<br />

experience are rare. Another disadvantage of this method is possibility of reaction of<br />

applied antibodies with antigens of other species of genus Chlamydia, which would<br />

lead to false positive results. Antibodies available on the market sometimes can react<br />

even with species that do not belong to genus Chlamydia. Monoclonal antibodies are<br />

expensive and polyclonal give worse results.<br />

ELISA. ELISA is another method applied in diagnostics of C. trachomatis. Its<br />

sensitivity is 50-70%. It is often applied in detection of specific antibodies in patients’<br />

blood that are synthesized under influence of C. trachomatis. In primary immune<br />

response first are synthesized antibodies of class IgM, and later IgG and IgA are the<br />

last. In secondary immune response just IgG and IgA are present, and IgM is absent.<br />

Because presence of various antibodies during the infection vary, it is necessary to<br />

perform test with at least 2 classes of antibodies, which additionally increase<br />

expenses. Immunity of a patient can be decreased for various reasons (the other<br />

disease, stress, treatment with immunosuppressors in case of patients with<br />

transplanted organ etc.), which can decrease concentration of antibodies below the<br />

sensitivity threshold of the method and increase amount of false negative results.<br />

Besides, antibodies begin to be synthesized always after an infection, and only after a<br />

given time amount of antibodies is increased above sensitivity threshold of the<br />

method. If concentration of antibodies is below the threshold, diagnostics is not<br />

possible. Very serious problem of this method is the fact that antibodies are present in<br />

the body of healthy patients after a treatment. This test, in this case, would be positive<br />

in spite of the fact that patient is healthy. This is a problem of all indirect methods that


134<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

detect presence of specific antibodies instead of causative agent of the disease.<br />

There is ELISA that detects antigens. These antigens are extracted by bacteria into<br />

the environment which can increase possibility to detect them because permanent<br />

extraction increases their concentration in the environment. In this case the method<br />

does not detect bacteria, but antigens that are extracted into environment. ELISA has<br />

the same problems with false positive reactions with bacteria of other species and<br />

genera as fluorescent antibodies methods, because it is based on antibodies, too.<br />

This method should not be used for detection of rectal samples because of increased<br />

reaction with fecal bacteria that can give more false positive results. Reaction of<br />

ELISA antibodies with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae is often reason of<br />

false positive results (Demaio et al., 1991; Anderson et al., 1993). Some ELISA tests<br />

(which detect presence of lipopolysaccharides of Chlamydia) do not distinguish<br />

species of genus Chlamydia, and positive result does not mean always that detected<br />

bacterium is C. trachomatis. Good characteristics of ELISA tests are high degree of<br />

automation, which made possible employment of low qualified personal, and low cost<br />

of the test. Bad characteristics are low reliability because of low sensitivity and<br />

possible false positive results.<br />

Hybridization with DNA probes. Hybridization with DNA probes is a molecular<br />

biology test. This kind of test is complicated, time and labor consuming, and<br />

expensive. Its sensitivity is just (50-70%) which is substantially less than sensitivity of<br />

the other kind of molecular test (PCR).<br />

Fast tests. This kind of tests is possible to bye in drug stores and patients can<br />

apply it by themselves following directions submitted with the test. Results can be<br />

obtained in 10-15 minutes. They can be based on immunochromatographic or specific<br />

enzyme reaction. They have a low sensitivity (40-60%) and specificity (Suchland et<br />

al., 1997). This kind of tests has just 1 good characteristic which is expressed in their<br />

name – they are fast and simple for application. Thus, they can be applied just for<br />

very rough screening.<br />

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based tests. PCR has been discovered by<br />

American scientist Kary Mullis in 1984, and shortly, it became a widely applied method<br />

in scientific research, and as well as in various applications (diagnostic of infectious<br />

and genetic diseases, forensic etc.). Kary Mullis became Nobel Prize winner in 1993<br />

for polymerase chain reaction. PCR based methods are the most advanced tools for<br />

diagnostic of C. trachomatis. It has a number of advantages in comparison to the<br />

other methods.<br />

• High sensitivity is one of the most important characteristics of PCR. PCR is<br />

based on replication (amplification) in vitro of a DNA sequence that is highly<br />

specific for infectious agent. A sequence that is present in a few or even just one<br />

copy can be copied (replicated) to produce a huge amount (thousands of billions


135<br />

Obradović: PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) in Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis . . .<br />

copies or even more). Such large amount of DNA molecules can be detected<br />

easily, and this is the main reason that PCR is more sensitive than the other<br />

methods. Analytical sensitivity of PCR is in most cases 1-10 elementary bodies<br />

of C. trachomatis. Sensitivity of fluorescent antibodies microscopy is 10-500<br />

elementary bodies, and ELISA 5000-100 000 elementary bodies (Black, 1997).<br />

Diagnostic sensitivity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is 90-100%.<br />

• PCR based methods are direct methods. They directly detect presence of the<br />

bacterium. Many other methods detect specific antibodies, or a product of the<br />

bacterium which is extracted into the environment. PCR based methods detects<br />

a specific DNA which is present in the bacterium.<br />

• High specificity of PCR based methods is possible because they amplify and<br />

detect a sequence highly specific for the bacterium. The sequence can be highly<br />

conservative that makes possible detection of causative agents with high<br />

antigenic changeability. Specificity of PCR based tests for C. trachomatis is<br />

99.6% (Black, 1997).<br />

• PCR methods can process samples in just 5-6 hours and provide highly reliable<br />

results.<br />

• Samples for PCR based methods can be processed from all sources including<br />

noninvasive ones, as urine.<br />

Disadvantages of PCR based methods are high price and complicated<br />

processing of the samples. This makes them unsuitable for large scale screenings.<br />

However, high reliability and other advantages are good compensation for mentioned<br />

disadvantages.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Polymerase chain reaction based methods are the most reliable methods for<br />

detection of C. trachomatis infections. Very important characteristics of a laboratory<br />

diagnostics method are sensitivity and specificity. PCR based methods are the most<br />

superior in this sense. They are direct methods based on detection of a DNA<br />

sequence specific for C. trachomatis, which insure that positive result means<br />

presence of the bacterium. These methods make possible processing of samples in<br />

one working day and they can be obtained from all sources including noninvasive,<br />

which make them very suitable for eradication of the disease. In contrast, low<br />

sensitivity of the other methods makes them unsuitable for reliable diagnostics.<br />

However, high expenses and application of high technology makes PCR based<br />

methods less accessible to patients.


136<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

REFERENCES<br />

A N D E R S O N , J. R., M U M T A Z , G., M U L H A R E , P., P O D D A R , J. and<br />

R I D G W A Y G. L. 1993: Mandatory Use of Confirmation Stage with<br />

Chlamydiazyme During Urinary Sediment Analysis. - J Clin Pathol 46: 896-897.<br />

B L A C K , C.M. 1997: Current Methods of Laboratory Diagnosis of Chlamydia<br />

trachomatis Infections. - Clinical Microbiology Reviews 10: 160–184<br />

D E M A I O , J., B O Y D , R.S., R E N S I , R. and C L A R K , A. 1991: False-positive<br />

Chlamydiazyme Results During Urine Sediment Analysis due to Bacterial<br />

Urinary Tract Infections. - J Clin Microbiol 29: 1436-8.<br />

O S S E W A A R D E , J. M. 1995: Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology<br />

and Venerology 5: 111-123.<br />

S T A M M , W.E. 1999: Chlamydia trachomatis Infections of the Adult. In: Holmes KK,<br />

Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, et al., eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 3 rd ed. New<br />

York, NY: McGraw-Hill,: 407-22.<br />

SUCHLAND, K.L., COUNTS, J.M. and S T A M M , W.E. (1997): Laboratory<br />

Methods for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: Survey of Laboratories in<br />

Washington State. - J Clin Microbiol 35: 3210-4.<br />

W A S H I N G T O N , A.E. and K A T Z , P. 1991: Cost of and Payment Source for Pelvic<br />

Inflammatory Disease. Trends and Projections, 1983 through 2000. - JAMA 266:<br />

2565-9.<br />

W E I N S T O C K , H., B E R M A N , S. and C A T E S , W. Jr. 2004: Sexually<br />

Transmitted Diseases among American Youth: Incidence and Prevalence<br />

Estimates, 2000. - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 36: 6-10.<br />

Received: 27.04.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:137-149<br />

INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Danko OBRADOVIĆ 1<br />

1<br />

University of Montenegro, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, P. O. Box 211, 81000 Podgorica,<br />

Montenegro<br />

Key words:<br />

transgenic plants,<br />

commercial use<br />

Klučne riječi:<br />

transgene biljke,<br />

komercijalna<br />

primena<br />

Synopsis<br />

In 1983, transgenic plants were introduced by four groups<br />

of authors. However, commercial use of transgenic plants dates<br />

from 1996. Since its first application, cultivation area of<br />

transgenic crops around the world has been permanently<br />

increasing. Transferring of a transgene from microorganisms,<br />

animals, and distant plants, transgenic plants can obtain novel<br />

treats that would probably never be introduced by conventional<br />

breeding. New treats that plants can get in nature by<br />

spontaneous mutations and breeding occur slowly. During the<br />

evolution organisms have been accommodated to changes in<br />

their environment, in contrast to revolutionary changes<br />

introduced by molecular biology methods applied on production<br />

of transgenic crops. This can make disbalance among organisms<br />

and cause some ecological problems. Such problems can be<br />

solved by regulations which forbid use of transgenic crops<br />

without vigorous assays for safe application.<br />

Sinopsis<br />

UTICAJ TRANSGENIH BILJAKA NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU<br />

Četiri grupe autora su 1983. godine po prvi put dobile transgene<br />

biljke. Ipak, komercijalna primena transgenih biljaka datira od 1996.<br />

godine. Od svoje prve primene, obradiva površina pod transgenim<br />

kulturama širom sveta je u stalnom porastu. Transferom nekog gena iz<br />

mikroorganizama, životinja i nesrodnih biljaka, transgene biljke mogu<br />

dobiti nove osobine koje verovatno ne bi nikada dobile konvencionalnim<br />

ukrštanjem. Nova svojstva koja biljke mogu dobiti u prirodi spontanim<br />

mutacijama i ukrštanjem događaju se sporo. U toku evolucije organizmi<br />

su se prilagođavali na promene u njihovoj okolini za razliku od<br />

revolucionarnih promena koje su uvele metode molekularne biologije<br />

primenjene u proizvodnji transgenih kultura. Ovo može dovesti do<br />

disbalansa među organizmima i uzrokovati neke ekološke probleme.<br />

Takvi problemi mogu biti rešeni propisima koji zabranjuju primenu<br />

transgenih biljaka bez prethodne temeljne provere bezbednosti primene.


138<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Plant breeding has been a basic method for obtaining plants of particular traits<br />

for several thousand years. People have used this method to improve some<br />

characteristics of plants (sweeter and larger fruits, aridity and disease resistance,<br />

faster growth) in spite of the fact that they did not understand breeding process and<br />

its background. In 1865, Gregor Mendel showed that the inheritance of traits follows<br />

particular regularities, but the significance of Mendel's work was not recognized until<br />

1900. Traditional plant breeding is very difficult and time and labor consuming<br />

process. By artificial plant crossing, plant breeders try to obtain plants of desirable<br />

traits. To achieve this goal, they have to travel all around the world to find plants of<br />

particular traits that are suitable for breeding. Variations of treats among plants arise<br />

as result of mutations. However, these mutations, and as well as variations, are of<br />

limited number. In 1926, Hermann Joseph Muller found that X-rays irradiation can<br />

induce mutations (in 1946 he was awarded Nobel Prize for this discovery) (M u l l e r ,<br />

1926). After this discovery, it was found out that irradiation of seed can greatly<br />

increase amount of mutations in next generation. Since the end of World War II,<br />

induced mutation have been widely applied in plant breeding. Such method was<br />

named mutation breeding. Mutations, and thus, variations of traits, can be induced<br />

with ionizing radiation (X-rays, gamma rays, alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons,<br />

protons) or chemical agents (sodium azide, ethyl methanesulphonate). This is a way<br />

to increase variability and to get plants of desirable traits that are not available in<br />

nature. This method is named mutation breading. It became popular after World War<br />

II, and it is popular at the present time as well.<br />

Classical plant breeding uses deliberate interbreeding of closely or distantly<br />

related species to produce new crops with desirable properties. Breeding is possible<br />

between plants within the same species, genus and, less commonly, between plants<br />

of different genera. Plants that are evolutionally distant have larger amount of different<br />

properties. Thus, amount of plant property variations that are available for breeding<br />

and obtaining of new crops is limited, because breeding between plants that are<br />

evolutionally distant is not possible. Even application of mutation breading produces<br />

new crops with limited variations in treats. Additionally, induced mutations which are<br />

obtained by mutation breeding produce new treats that cannot be predicted, because<br />

mutations are random events. All these features of classical and mutation breeding<br />

limit their application.<br />

In 1983, four groups of authors, almost simultaneously, introduced a novel<br />

method for production of new crops. They worked independently, and three of them<br />

announced their work at a conference in Miami, USA in January 1983 (Framond et al.,<br />

1983; Schell et al., 1983; Fraley et al., 1983). Their researches enable gene transfer<br />

from bacteria into plants. These works were published in scientific journals as well<br />

(B e v a n , et al. 1983; H e r r e r a - E s t r e l l a et al., 1983; F r a l e y et al., 1983). The<br />

fourth had transferred a plant gene from one species into another species. They<br />

announced their research at a conference in Los Angeles, USA, in April 1983, and


139<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

later it was published in a journal (M u r a i et al., 1983). Plants obtained this way are<br />

transgenic plants. This method enables gene insertion of one or more genes from a<br />

plant which can be evolutionally very distant into another plant. The genes can be<br />

transferred from any organism (animals, bacteria, viruses etc.) into a plant. This<br />

makes possible production of novel crops with new treats which in practice can never<br />

be obtained by breeding. Very important feature of this method is possibility to predict<br />

novel treats of transgenic crops. It enables to skip millions of years of evolution that<br />

would be necessary for nature to produce plants with so different treats. This skip<br />

made impossible accommodation between transgenic crops and environment, and<br />

develops concerns regarding the application of transgenic plants. However, transgenic<br />

plants can provide substantial benefits: better nutritional characteristics, increased<br />

productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, pest and disease resistance,<br />

etc.<br />

Production Process of Transgenic Plants<br />

Molecular biology methods enable gene transfer and production of transgenic<br />

plants. These methods are commonly named genetic engineering. Actually, all<br />

molecular biology methods that can be involved as tools for changing of genetic<br />

constitution are named genetic engineering. Production of transgenic plants consists<br />

of: isolation of a gene from donor organism, insertion of the gene into plant cell,<br />

obtaining of whole plants from transformed cells grown in tissue culture, plant<br />

breeding and testing.<br />

Isolation of a Gene from a Donor Organism. This is the most difficult step in<br />

production of transgenic plants. This step is mostly based on fundamental research in<br />

determination of structure and function of donor organism genes. It is very important<br />

to locate and determine the role of a gene, its function and treats that the gene is<br />

responsible for. Identification of expression mechanisms of the gene and its influence<br />

on other genes, metabolic pathways of gene products is very important. Procedure of<br />

this step depends very much on results of such researches. In contrast to this step, all<br />

other steps are processed under well determined procedures. Isolated gene that is to<br />

be inserted into a plant is termed transgene.<br />

Insertion of the Gene into Plant Cells. Currently, there are two types of<br />

vehicles which can be used for gene insertion into plants. The most often used vehicle<br />

is Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Figure 1). A. tumefaciens is a gram negative, rod<br />

shaped, bacteria, which is the causal agent of Crown Gall disease (the formation of<br />

tumors) of dicots. It has been used as gene transfer vehicle into dicots, and just<br />

recently into monocots. A. tumefaciens contains chromosomal DNA and plasmid<br />

(known as the Ti-plasmid for tumor-inducing plasmid). In order to be virulent the<br />

bacterial Ti-plasmid has to contain a small segment of DNA termed T-DNA<br />

(transferred DNA), and vir (virulence) genes that direct the infection process. A.


140<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

tumefaciens are attracted to wound sites of a plant by chemotaxis. This is a response<br />

to the release of some common root components (sugars and particularly phenolic<br />

compounds such as acetosyringone). Acetosyringone activates vir genes on the Tiplasmid.<br />

Activity of this gene leads to the production of opine permease, that is<br />

inserted in the bacterial cell membrane for uptake of compounds (opines) that will be<br />

produced by the tumors, and production of an enzyme restriction endonuclease that<br />

excises part of the Ti-plasmid termed the T-DNA. Excised T-DNA released by the<br />

bacterium enters the plant cells and in an unknown way integrates into the<br />

chromosome. T-DNA dictates change in the functioning of those cells which cause<br />

formation of tumors.<br />

Figure 1. Simplified organization of a sequence constructed for insertion into a plant genome.<br />

Insertion of a transgene into plant cell genome does not mean that the gene will<br />

be expressed. Unexpressed gene will not code any product (protein), and thus, will<br />

not provide any new treat to the plant. In order to provide gene expression a promoter<br />

DNA sequence has to be inserted together with the gene, and as well as a termination<br />

sequence (terminator). Terminator signals that gene coding sequences ends, and that<br />

transcription of the DNA has to be ended. A given promoter and terminator can be<br />

combined with various genes (Figure 2). The degree of gene expression, the region of<br />

plant body where the gene will be expressed, and the plant life cycle stage depend on<br />

which promoter is applied.<br />

A marker gene has to be inserted together with the transgene. It is necessary for<br />

selection of cells which received and expressed a transgene. It encodes a protein<br />

which provides resistance to an agent (usually antibiotics or herbicides) which is toxic<br />

to plant cells. Thus, cells that received transgene will be resistant to the toxic agent<br />

(they will survive), and all other cells will die.<br />

Figure 2. Bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens.


141<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Ti-plasmid used in gene transfer process is not a wild type plasmid, but plasmid<br />

especially constructed for this purpose. T-DNA sequence which causes tumor growth<br />

is deleted and just its border sequence is retained. A. tumefaciens with such Tiplasmid<br />

is not a pathogen. It retains ability to insert the plasmid into the cell, but the<br />

plasmid cannot cause tumor growth. Transgene is to be inserted into the Ti-plasmid,<br />

instead of removed T-DNA sequence and transferred into a plant cell. The cell is<br />

maintained in tissue culture and transgene is incorporated into the plant chromosome.<br />

The cells in tissue culture are grown in media containing nutrients and hormones<br />

necessary for cell growth.<br />

Obtaining of Whole Plants from Transformed Cells Grown in Tissue<br />

Culture. After the treatment with A. tumefaciens, it is necessary to select transformed<br />

cells. The selection is carried out by replacement of standard media with selectable<br />

media, which contain an agent (usually antibiotic or herbicide) toxic for the cells.<br />

Marker gene inserted into plant chromosome together with the transgene provides<br />

resistance to the toxic agent. Thus, the cells that received marker gene will survive in<br />

the tissue culture, and all other will die. Survived cells will be maintained to produce<br />

an embryo and eventually whole plant.<br />

Plant Breeding and Testing. A limited number of plant lines is possible to use<br />

in effective gene transfer. They are usually not elite lines. To obtain an elite line with a<br />

transgene it is necessary to breed transgenic plant with an elite line. After the<br />

breeding process, a transgenic plant containing at least 98% of elite genes is<br />

produced. The next step is testing of the plant (expression of transgene, stability of<br />

inheritance of the treats, unexpected features of the plant etc.).<br />

Another method for insertion of a transgene is the gene gun. All steps in<br />

production of transgenic plants applying gene gun are pretty much the same as with<br />

A. tumefaciens, except gene insertion. Gene gun method applies microscopic gold<br />

particles to deliver a transgene into the plant cell nucleus. Golden particles coated<br />

with a large amount of transgenes together with a marker gene are accelerated with<br />

air pressure and shoot at tissue culture cells. The golden particles will pass into the<br />

cell nucleus. Coated DNA will be dissolved and inserted into the chromosome. The<br />

method with A. tumefaciens is more effective than gene gun method, but it cannot be<br />

applied to every plant species. A. tumefaciens is ussualy applied with dicots, and<br />

gene gun with monocots.<br />

Transgenic Plants Benefits<br />

New treats introduced by insertion of transgenes into plants can provide a<br />

number of benefits: pest and disease resistance, herbicide tolerance, better nutritional<br />

characteristics, increased productivity, longer shelf life, environmental tolerance, etc.


142<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Pest and Disease Resistance. Insertion of a transgene (isolated from a soil<br />

bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis) coding a crystalline (Cry) protein can introduce pest<br />

resistance to transgenic plants. In the intestine gut, the protein is broken down to<br />

release delta-endotoxin that creates pores in the intestinal lining of pets. This creates<br />

ion imbalance, dysfunction of digestive system, and death of the insect in a few days.<br />

Product of Cry gene is considered safe for human and birds, and less harmful for nontarget<br />

insects than other insecticides. Insecticides based on Cry gene have been used<br />

for long time, but in this case they are produced by plant in the plant body. Thus,<br />

insects eating such plant will eventually die. Plants containing this transgene are<br />

named Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) plants. Bt plants available by now are: Bt cotton (to<br />

control European corn borer, Southwestern corn borer, and corn earworm), Bt cotton<br />

(to control cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm), and Bt potato (to control Colorado<br />

potato beetle). Bt plants can decrease application of insecticides, and so, the<br />

surrounding environment is no longer exposed to large amounts of harmful insecticide.<br />

Time and labor saving is achieved too.<br />

Transgenic papaya and squash carrying virus coat protein gene are resistant<br />

to virus. This gene produces virus coat protein before an infection. After the infection,<br />

plant cells will not produce this protein because of co-suppression (plant cell<br />

mechanism which suppresses production of the viral protein), and virus cannot<br />

replicate.<br />

Herbicide Tolerance. Weeds can significantly decrease crop yield, and so<br />

herbicides are widely applied for weed control. Sometimes farmers apply more than<br />

one herbicide because they are specific for a particular weed, and they are applied at<br />

particular growth stage. Herbicides are long lasting and can persist in the soil for<br />

years. Transgenic herbicide tolerant plants have a transgene providing resistance to<br />

new herbicide that can kill all kinds of plants (including weeds). These herbicides<br />

break down in the soil quickly. So far, there are two herbicides that are used with<br />

herbicide tolerant plants: Liberty (glufosinate) and Roundup (glyphosate). These<br />

herbicides break down quickly in contrast to conventional herbicides that can remain<br />

in the soil for more than a year, and thus prevent farmers to plant crops sensitive to<br />

them in future. Fast degradation of these new herbicides protects environment of large<br />

scale contamination, which can be common in the case of conventional herbicides. An<br />

example of transgenic herbicide tolerant plant is Roundup Ready soybean.<br />

Long-Lasting Products. Some plants (strawberries, tomatoes, pineapples,<br />

sweet peppers and bananas) are genetically modified to produce less enzyme that<br />

cause products to rot. These plants can remain firm and fresh for long time. The first<br />

long-lasting plant modified plants was tomato, which came on the market in 1994.<br />

Such tomato can tolerate a longer transport time and it can be allowed to ripen in the<br />

sun before picking - resulting in a better tasting tomato.


143<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

Improvements of nutritious characteristics of the plants. Nutritious<br />

characteristics of a plant can be improved by inserting a transgene. An example is<br />

golden rice. It contains beta-carotene which is converted into vitamin A in the body.<br />

For the golden rice to make beta-carotene three new genes are implanted: two from<br />

daffodils and the third from a bacterium.<br />

Transgenic Plants Risks and Concerns<br />

Transgenic plants can provide many benefits, but in the same time some risks<br />

and concerns. Insertion of transgenes into plants, which introduces novel treats to the<br />

plants, can change interactions among plants and animals. This can cause ecological<br />

and other kinds of problems.<br />

Gene Transfer from Transgenic Crops to Their Wild Relatives. Many crops<br />

have wild relatives which can be crossed by pollination. Thus, there is real danger of<br />

gene transfer from crops to wild population including weeds (K a i s e r , 2001; P o p p y<br />

and W i l k i n s o n , 2005). This possibility is supported by researches. Wild population<br />

would receive novel treats that can make them resistant to many factors. This is<br />

especially critical for weeds. Weeds resistant for herbicides, plant diseases, climatic<br />

factors etc. would be a nightmare for every farmer. Transgene transfer to wild<br />

relatives that are not weeds is not desirable either, because this could change natural<br />

balance in the wild nature and cause ecological problems.<br />

Crop to Crop Gene Flow. Gene transfer is possible from transgenic to<br />

conventional crops (H a l l et al., 2000; R i t a l a e t al., 2002).The transfer is processed<br />

by pollination, and pollen can be carried by wind and insects. After this gene flow,<br />

farmers that plant conventional crops will have transgenic even if they dislike them.<br />

Long-term application of transgenic crops and gene flow can lead even to complete<br />

loss of conventional crops. This is the most likely to occur in the case of highly<br />

outcrossing plants in contrast to highly self-pollinating plants.<br />

Antibiotic resistance. All transgenic crops in the process of their production<br />

have to contain a marker gene which is inserted to insure that a transgene has been<br />

inserted into the plant. It is usually an antibiotic resistance gene. There is a concern<br />

that bacteria, which inhabit intestine of human and animals, could be transformed by<br />

transfer of a DNA fragment carrying the antibiotic resistance gene from the intestine<br />

into the bacterial cell. After such transformation, bacteria would become resistant to a<br />

given antibiotic. This could lead to increase of amount of antibiotic resistant bacterial<br />

strains in the nature, and would cause problems in human and animal medical<br />

treatment. However, application of new markers that do not represent antibiotic<br />

resistance genes would resolve this problem. An example of such markers is green<br />

fluorescent protein and mannose (Joersbo et al., 1998). Another way to resolve this


144<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

problem is to remove the marker after the development of transgenic plant, when its<br />

presence is not required any more (Zuo, 2001). Transgenic plants with green<br />

fluorescent protein as a marker and with removed markers are already submitted for<br />

authorization and their large scale production can be expected soon.<br />

Allergenicity. Insertion of a transgene into a plant can cause production of a<br />

product which is an allergen. This allergen will cause allergic reaction, which can be<br />

fatal to persons who consume such plants and are allergic. Some plants do not<br />

contain any allergen, but insertion of a transgene which produces them can cause<br />

health problem and even death of people who are allergic. Allergic people who do not<br />

know that a transgenic plant contains a given allergen can be in great danger. An<br />

example is transgenic soybean with inserted gene from Brazil nut (Nordlee et al.,<br />

1996). The gene was inserted to improve nutritional characteristics of soybean, but<br />

people who were allergic to Brazil nut were allergic to mentioned transgenic soybean<br />

too. This soybean has never been approved for market application. Now, all<br />

transgenic plants are tested for allergens to solve this problem.<br />

Terminator Technology. In 1990s U.S. Department of Agriculture and Delta<br />

and Pine Land Company developed a method for protection of technology. The goal of<br />

this method is to force farmers to pay intellectual property for development of<br />

transgenic plants. Actually, many farmers all over the world save some seeds to plant<br />

next year. If they buy transgenic seeds from a company developer of the transgenic<br />

plant once, they do not have to buy it anymore because they can produce transgenic<br />

seeds by themselves, saving some of the seeds in next generation. In 1998,<br />

developers of mentioned method were awarded a joint patent. The method is named<br />

Technology Protection System (TPS). TPS makes possible production of seeds which<br />

is sterile in the second generation. Seeds obtained after first generation is good for<br />

consumption, but plant embryo is killed by TPS, making seed unsuitable for planting.<br />

Thus, if farmers want to plant transgenic plants, they have to buy seeds from company<br />

developer of the seed.<br />

Advantage of this technology is that plant pollinated with transgenic plants will<br />

be sterile as well, and it will prevent gene flow from transgenic plant to the other<br />

plants. Another advantage is that this will encourage biotech companies for further<br />

development of transgenic plants with novel treats, especially those that are not so<br />

profitable for them.<br />

Disadvantage is that some farmers, especially small and farmers in developing<br />

countries, will not be able to buy seeds every season. That would increase cost of the<br />

production, and it can lead to their bankruptcy in competition with large<br />

manufacturers. Another disadvantage is that neighboring non-transgenic crops and<br />

wild plants would be affected, because after possible pollination their seeds would be<br />

sterile and it could cause lower yield. This impact would be higher on non-transgenic<br />

crops than on wild plants.


145<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

There is another system for protection of technology named Trait-specific<br />

Genetic Use Restriction Technology or T-Gurt. It was developed by agro-chemical<br />

companies including Monsanto and AstraZeneca. T-Gurt does not cause production of<br />

sterile seeds. The seeds in next generation would not express transgenes. However, if<br />

seeds are sprayed with a chemical, sold solely by the manufacturer of seeds, the<br />

transgene would be expressed.<br />

Benefits of this technology are that transgenes would not be expressed in the<br />

wild plants, and farmers can plant seeds obtained in the next generation (but without<br />

expression of transgenes if they do not buy the chemicals). Disadvantages are that<br />

transgenes would be transferred by pollination to the neighboring population (crops<br />

and wild plants) in spite the fact that it will not be expressed and spraying of the seed<br />

with the chemicals can make negative impact on environment.<br />

A new sophisticated system for protection of technology which produces sterile<br />

seeds is under development. This seed becomes fertile if it is sprayed with a chemical<br />

sold by company developer of the transgenic plant.<br />

None of terminator technologies has been applied yet. A great resistance to its<br />

application given by farmers all around the world is one of the reasons for delaying of<br />

the application. However, it is hard to believe that large agro-chemical companies will<br />

quit these projects which can enable them to make additional large scale profit.<br />

Production of Transgenic Crops around the World<br />

In 1996, the first transgenic crops were planted in the USA for commercial use.<br />

Cultivation of transgenic crops has shown permanent increase (Figure 3) according to<br />

ISAAA (ISAAA, 2006). In 2006, they were grown on 102 million hectares worldwide.<br />

The increase has been observed in both, industrial and developing countries. The<br />

USA is the country with the largest area planted with transgenic crops. European<br />

countries do not plant large areas with transgenic plants, and their amounts are<br />

modest in comparison to some other countries (table 1). In 2006, the most often<br />

planted transgenic crops around the world were: soybean (58.6 million hectares),<br />

maize (25.2 million hectares), cotton (13.4 million hectares), canola (4.8 million<br />

hectares).


146<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

Figure 3. Global area of transgenic plants in<br />

million hectares (1996-2006).<br />

COUNTRY<br />

CULTIVATION<br />

AREAS<br />

TRANSGENIC PLANTS<br />

USA 54,6 S,M,C,R, Squash, Papaya,<br />

Alfalfa<br />

Argentina 18,0 S,M,C<br />

Brazil 11,5 S, C<br />

Canada 6,1 R,M,S<br />

India 3,8 C<br />

China 3,5 C<br />

Paraguay 2,0 S<br />

South Africa 1,4 M,S,C<br />

Uruguay 0,4 S,M<br />

Philippines 0,2 M<br />

Australia 0,2 C<br />

<strong>Rom</strong>ania 0,1 S<br />

Mexico 0,1 C,S<br />

Spain 0,1 M<br />

Colombia


147<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

There are many contradictory opinions in connection with transgenic plants.<br />

Even experts in that field do not have common opinion. Some experts have opinion<br />

that application of transgenic plants can be very dangerous for environment and<br />

human health. The others have opinion that risks are overestimated, and that future is<br />

in transgenic plants. Actually, probably both groups of experts are right. Application of<br />

transgenic plants without appropriate regulations can be very risky. The new<br />

transgenes inserted into them, and novel treats, can disturb harmony among<br />

organisms that has been built by nature for many millions of years. This<br />

disorganization of an ecosystem is not predictable and cannot be always prevented.<br />

Restoring of the consequences could be very difficult and probably in majority of the<br />

cases impossible. Transgenes that are accidentally transferred to the other plants,<br />

including wild environment, will stay there forever. However, application of transgenic<br />

plants can increase agricultural production, decrease cost of products and save<br />

environment by decreasing amount of applied chemicals (or by application of safer<br />

chemicals). Transgenic plant can be resistant to various plant diseases and<br />

environmental conditions which can make them very suitable for agricultural<br />

production. The problems caused by introduction of transgenes cannot be solved by<br />

nature, or to be more accurate, nature would need very long time to do that with<br />

dangerous consequences. Thus, only solution is to prevent all known problems and to<br />

begin with application of transgenic plants with precautions. Regulations, which would<br />

prevent large scale application without preliminary assays and approval, are<br />

necessary at national and as well as international levels.<br />

Contemporary obtained improvements obtained by transgenic technology are<br />

very modest in comparison to benefits that will be in the future. Now, we enjoy y just<br />

novice movements in this field. Benefits in the future will be so huge that agricultural<br />

production without transgenic plants can be compared to transportation with animaldrawn<br />

vehicles.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

BEVAN, M.W., FLAVELL, R.B. and C H I L T O N M.D. 1983: A Chimaeric<br />

Antibiotic Resistance Gene as a Selectable Marker for Plant Cell<br />

Transformation. - Nature 304: 184-187.<br />

F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.B. and H O R S C H . R.B. 1983: Use of a Chimeric<br />

Gene to Confer Antibiotic Resistance to Plant Cells. - Advances in Gene<br />

Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia<br />

Vol. 20: 211-221.<br />

F R A L E Y , R.T., R O G E R S , S.G., H O R S C H , R.B., S A N D E R S , P.R., F L I C K ,<br />

J.S., A D A M S , S.P., B I T T N E R , M.L., B R A N D , L.A., F I N K , C.L., F R Y ,


148<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007<br />

J.S., G A L L U P P I , G.R., G O L D B E R G , S.B. H O F F M A N N , N.L. and<br />

W O O , S.C. 1983: Expression of Bacterial Genes in Plant Cells. - Proceedings<br />

of the National Academy of Sciences 80: 4803-4807.<br />

FRAMOND, A.J., BEVAN, M.W., BARTON, K.A., FLAVELL, F. and<br />

C H I L T O N , M.D. 1983: Mini-Ti Plasmid and a Chimeric Gene Construct: New<br />

Approaches to Plant Gene Vector Construction. - Advances in Gene Technology:<br />

Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. Miami Winter Symposia Vol 20: 159-<br />

170.<br />

H A L L , L., T O P I N K A , K., H U F F M A N , J., and D A V I S , L. 2000: Pollen Flow<br />

between Herbicide-resistant Brassica napus Is the Cause of Multiple-resistant B.<br />

napus Volunteers. - Weed Science 48: 688-694.<br />

HERRERA-ESTRELLA, L., DEPICKER, A., Van MONTAGU, M. and<br />

S C H E L L , J. 1983. Expression of Chimaeric Genes Transfered into Plant Cells<br />

Using a Ti-plasmid-derived Vector. - Nature 303: 209-213.<br />

ISAAA (The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications)<br />

Briefs (2006) 35.<br />

JOERSBO, M., DONALDSON, I., KREIBERG, J., PETERSEN, S.G.,<br />

B R U N S T E D T , J. and O K K E L S , F.T. (1998): Analysis of Mannose<br />

Selection Used for Transformation of Sugar Beet. Molecular Breeding 4: 111-<br />

117.<br />

K A I S E R , J. 2001: Breeding a Hardier Weed. - Science 293: 1425-1426.<br />

M U L L E R , H.J. 1926: The Problem of Genetic Modification. Fifth International<br />

Congress of Genetics. Berlin.<br />

M U R A I , N., S U T T O N , D.W., M U R R A Y , M.G., S L I G H T O M , J.L., M E R L O ,<br />

D.J., REICHERT, N.A., SENGUPTA-GOPALAN, C., STOCK, C.A.,<br />

B A R K E R , R.F., K E M P , J.D. and H A L L ., T.C. 1983: Phaseolin Gene from<br />

Bean Is Expressed after Transfer to Sunflower via Tumor-inducing Plasmid<br />

Vectors. - Science 222: 476-482.<br />

NORDLEE, J.A., TAYLOR, S.L., TOWNSEND, J.A., THOMAS, L.A. and<br />

B U S H , R.K. 1996: Identification of a Brazil-nut Allergen in Transgenic<br />

Soybeans. - New England Journal of Medicine 334: 688-692.<br />

POPPY, G.M. and W I L K I N S O N M.J. 2005: Gene Flow from GM Plants. -<br />

Blackwell Publishing.<br />

RITALA, A., NUUTILA, A.M., AIKASALO, R., KAUPPINEN, V. and<br />

T A M M I S O L A , J. 2002: Measuring Gene Flow in the Cultivation of Transgenic<br />

Barley. Crop Science 42: 278-285.<br />

SCHELL, J., Van MONTAGU, M., HOLSTERS, M., ZAMBRYSKI, P.,<br />

J O O S , H., I N Z E , D., H E R R E R A - E S T R E L L A , L., D E P I C K E R , A., D e


149<br />

Obradović: INFLUENCE OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS ON ENVIRONMENT<br />

BLOCK, M., CAPLAN, A., DHAESE, P., Van HAUTE, E.,<br />

HERNALSTEENS, J-P., De GREVE, H., LEEMANS, J.,<br />

DEBLAERE, R., WILLMITZER, L., SCHRODER, J. and<br />

O T T E N , L . 1983: Ti Plasmids as Experimental Gene Vectors for Plants.<br />

Advances in Gene Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals. -<br />

Miami Winter Symposia Vol. 20: 191-209.<br />

Z U O , J., N I U , Q.W., M O L L E R , S.G. and C H U A , N.H. 2001: Chemical-regulated,<br />

Site-specific DNA Excision in Transgenic Plants. - Nature Biotechnology 19:<br />

157-161.<br />

Received: 27.04.2007.


150<br />

Natura Montenegrina, 6/2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:151-152<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) P a r l NEW SPECIES IN MONTENEGRIN FLORA<br />

Vera BIBERDŽIĆ 1<br />

1 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg Vojvode Bećir Bega Osmanagića 16,<br />

81000 Podgorica, Montenegro, E-mail: pr<strong>muzej</strong>@cg.yu<br />

During macrophyta research of Skadar Lake and its surroundings, the species<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl was found, representing the first finding of this taxon<br />

in Montenegro. A very small population of floating leaves was found at the locality<br />

called Pančeva oka.<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl represents the remainder of the tertiary<br />

hydrophyte flora in our country and in the Balkan Peninsula. In phylogenetic respect, it<br />

is most similar to Alisma genus, which is characterized by a cosmopolitan distribution.<br />

Pollination is entomophilic, and the dispersal of seeds is hydrochory i.e. by water. It is<br />

vegetatively propagated via adventitious tree buds, blossoms in July and August. It<br />

belongs to the subtropical flora component.<br />

Genus Caldesia Parl. is represented in the European Flora by one species:<br />

Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl. (T u t i n et al. 1964-1980) and it is generally<br />

distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, Asia and Australia. In the<br />

temperate zone of Eurasia it is also distributed disjointly: one part of the areal can be<br />

found in Central and Southern Europe (to France to the west, to Ukraine to the east,<br />

to Lithuania to the north and to central Italy to the south) (T u t i n et al 1964-1980,<br />

Vukojič i ć , S., J a n k o v i ć , M. 1999), while the other one involves eastern Asia<br />

(Manchuria, China, Japan).<br />

Prodromus Flore penisulae Balcanicae, Hayek 1932-1933, records that Caldesia<br />

parnassifolia (Bassi) Parl is present in Bosnia and Herzegovina?, Serbia and Bulgaria.<br />

The species has also been recorded in Croatia (N i k o l i ć , T. 2005)<br />

The taxon has been included in the European Red List for Flora. It has also<br />

been included in the List of the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife<br />

and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention) and in the List of Species of the Habitats<br />

Directive (Annex IIb, IVb.)<br />

In future research, we will try to find this taxon at other localities as well, to<br />

determine the size of the population and to identify the degree to which it is<br />

endangered in Montenegrin flora.


152<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

LITERATURE<br />

H A Y E K , A. 1932-1933: Prodromus Florae Penisulae Balcanicae. - 3 Fedes Repert.<br />

(Beih) 30.<br />

NIKOLIĆ , T., T O P I Ć J. ur. 2005: Crvena knjiga vaskularne flore Republike<br />

Hrvatske. Kategorije EX,RE,CR,EN i VU. - Ministarstvo kulture, Državni zavod<br />

za zaštitu prirode, Zagreb, 4-695.<br />

TUTIN, T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A. MOORE., VALENTINE,<br />

D. H., WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds) 1964 - 1980: Flora Europaea 1-<br />

5. - Cambridge University Press.<br />

VUKOJIČ I Ć , S., J A N K O V I Ć , M. 1999: Caldesia parnassifolia (L.) Parl u<br />

Stevanović, V.: Crvena knjiga flore Srbije, 1, Taksoni iščezli iz Srbije. -<br />

Ministarstvo za životnu sredinu Republike Srbije, 57-136.<br />

Received: 08.11.2007.


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:153-160<br />

ADDITIONS TO THE FLORA OF MONTENEGRO: Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.,<br />

Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel., Impatiens balsamina L.<br />

AND Catalpa bignoniodes Walt.<br />

Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) Nejc J O G A N 2)<br />

1)<br />

Faculty of Science, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, denist@cg.yu<br />

2) Department of Biology BF, University in Ljubljana, Večna pot 111, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia,<br />

nejc.jogan@bf.uni-lj.si<br />

Setaria verticilliformis Dumort.<br />

According to compilation by R o h l e n a 1942 later amended by P u l e v i ć<br />

2005 in the flora of Montenegro genus Setaria PB. is represented with only 3 species:<br />

Setaria glauca (= Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.), S. verticillata (L.) PB. and<br />

S. viridis (L.) PB.<br />

Recently, two additional taxa of Setaria have been recorded: S. verticilliformis<br />

Dum. and S. viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvel.<br />

The first mentioned species has been recorded in the city area of Podgorica (city<br />

lawns, waste places and roadsides). Using keys in Pignati (1982a) species can be<br />

determined as S. ambigua Guss. Checking additional literature sources (H i t c h o c k<br />

1950, C l a y t o n 1980, W i s s k i r c h e n & H a e u p l e r 1998, M a r t i n č i ć<br />

1999, A e s c h i m a n n et al 2004, F i s c h e r et al 2005,<br />

http://herbarium.usu.edu/treatments/Setaria.htm), we noticed that opinion about<br />

taxonomic status of this taxon differs between authors. According to ITIC (Integrated<br />

Taxonomic Information System - http://itis.gov/) its accepted scientific name is S.<br />

verticilliformis Dumort. Some more important synonyms are listed below:<br />

= Setaria verticillata (L.) PB. var. ambigua (Guss.) Parl.<br />

= Setaria verticillata × viridis<br />

= Setaria ambigua (Guss.) Guss., non Schraeder<br />

= Setaria decipiens Schimp. ex Nyman<br />

= Setaria gussonei Kerg.<br />

S. verticilliformis is thermocosmopolitan species (P i g n a t i 1982a), so we<br />

presume that the reason why it was not reported for the flora of Montenegro up to<br />

now, might be its confusion with similar S. verticillata or S. viridis.<br />

Photos of panicles of these 3 Setaria species, macrodetails of rachis and<br />

bristles, and some distinguishing characters are given below:


154<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

bristles are retroversly scabrous, rachis is retroversly scabrous<br />

bristles are mostly antroversly scabrous, rachis is antroversly scabrous<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />

bristles are antroversly scabrous, rachis is hispid and villous


155<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

Setaria viridis (L.) PB. subsp. pycnocoma (Steud) Tzvelev<br />

Taxonomy of the group of closely related taxa between wild S. viridis on one<br />

side and cultivated S. italica, on the other, is quite blurred. Most probably the reason<br />

for that is, that the wild mentioned species is supposed to be a progenitior of the<br />

cultivated one, so they are morphologically linked by an array of intermediates. Those,<br />

more resembling typical S. viridis are often recognized as S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma<br />

and the ones closer to typical S. italica but still retaining some “wild” character states<br />

as presence of bristles, disarticulating ripe spikelets etc. are called S. italica subsp.<br />

moharia (Alef.) Koern. Main distinguishing characters delimiting mentioned subspecies<br />

of S. viridis are (compiled by Jogan in Martinčič et al. 2007):<br />

- Stem more than 80 cm high (less than 50 (80) cm in type subsp.)<br />

- Panicle lobed and interrupt towards the base, more than (0.8) 1.2 cm wide (vs.<br />

not lobed and up to 0.6 (0.8) cm wide)<br />

- Spikelets (2.2) 2.4-2.6 (2.8) mm long (and only (1.8) 2-2.4 (2.5) mm in subsp.<br />

viridis)<br />

The most important synonyms of S. viridis<br />

subsp. pycnocoma are:<br />

- Setaria viridis (L.) PB. var. major<br />

(Gaudin) Peterm.<br />

- Setaria gigantea (Franch. & Sav.)<br />

Makino<br />

- Setaria pycnocoma (Steud.) Nakai<br />

- Panicum comosum Steud.


156<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

As an obligate segetal weed, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma, is supposed to be of<br />

a hybrid origin between cultivated and wild growing relatives mentioned above.<br />

Darmency (2005) compiled a “dynamic” model of possible relationship among wild,<br />

weedy, crop and feral forms in the Setaria italica/S. viridis group:<br />

Species Process Resulting Type Conclusion Likelihood<br />

S. viridis Selection by man S. italica Domestication High<br />

S. italica Seed lost at harvest S. italica Volunteerism Very low<br />

S. italica Back mutation S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

S. viridis Genetic variability S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

S. italica and<br />

S.viridis<br />

Interspecific gene<br />

flow<br />

S. viridis ssp.<br />

pycnocoma<br />

Endoferality<br />

Mimicry<br />

Exoferality<br />

Hyper<br />

rare<br />

Possible<br />

High<br />

In Montenegro, up to now, S. viridis subsp. pycnocoma has been recorded in<br />

Gornji Kokoti (roadside Podgorica – Cetinje), but we can expect its scattered<br />

occurrence also in other lowland parts of the country. Its recent discovery in the<br />

discussed territory (together with the first discovered S. decipiens) showed a need for<br />

taxonomic revision of this genus in the flora of Montenegro.<br />

Impatiens balsamina L. (fam. Balsaminaceae)<br />

In the flora of Montenegro, genus Impatiens L. was present with only one<br />

species - Impatiens noli tangere (R o h l e n a 1942, P u l e v i ć 2005), which is<br />

according to M o o r e (1968) the only Impatiens species native to Europe. All others<br />

are neophytes from Asia and North America (M o o r e 1968, S l a v n i k 1995).<br />

During our field survey undertaken on June 22, 2007, at waste place on Tološko<br />

polje, we have found a few indviduals of unfamiliar Imaptiens, later identified as<br />

Impatiens balsamina (M o o r e 1968, P i g n a t i 1982b). It is annual, up to 1m tall,<br />

with alternate, eliptical to lanceolate-obovate leaves, with serrate margins and 15-20<br />

teeth on each side. Flowers are solitary or in groups up to 3 in leaf axils, pinkish to<br />

purplish to white. Capsula pubescent.


157<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

Impatiens noli tangere<br />

Impatiens balsamina<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević<br />

Impatiens balsamina originates from South East Asia and just after its<br />

introduction to Europe (1542) it stared to spread spontaneously (http://www.bbg.org/<br />

gar2/topics/plants/handbooks/flowers/5b.html).<br />

According to available sources I. balsamina is reported in several European<br />

countries as ephemeral escape from the gardens (Italy, UK, Czech Republic, Austria,<br />

Hungary; P i g n a t i 1982b, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, P y š e k et al. 2002, E<br />

s s l & R a b i t s c h 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004), occasionally naturalized<br />

(Austria, France, Italy, Czech Republic, (?)Yugoslavia; M o o r e 1968, G r e t u e r et<br />

al. 1984) or maybe even an invasive alien species in E Europe (http://www.sevin.ru/<br />

invasive/dbases/plants/species.html).<br />

In some other regions of the world, such as in Austral-Pacific region (http://www.<br />

gisp.org/downloadpubs/AP_NATIO.PDF), Pacific islands (http://www.hear.org/pier/reports/<br />

kiribati_appendix1.htm), Micronesia (http://www.hear.org/pier/pdf/kosrae_report.pdf),<br />

Peru (http://i3n.iabin.net/documents/progress_peru_cbd_informe.doc), etc... I. balsamina<br />

has status of invasive species.<br />

Considering the appearance of I. balsamina at Tološko polje, we presume its<br />

seeds were brought here with the waste from nearby gardens, in which it is grown as<br />

an ornamental plant, so in Montenegro it can be only an ephemeral garden escape.


158<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

Catalpa bignonioides Walt. (fam. Bignoniaceae)<br />

Catalpa bignonioides (photo by Danijela Stešević)<br />

Catalpa bignonioides originates from South East part of North America. It is very<br />

decorative deciduous tree, up to 15m high, with rounded to broad crown. Leaves are<br />

opposite, with simple, broadly egg- shaped leaflet up to 30cm long, sometimes with<br />

one or two lateral lobes. Petiole is up to 16cm long. Flowers are big (3-4 cm), white<br />

and two lipped, with two yellow strips in inner part as well as purple spots.<br />

Inflorescence is a panicle. It is flowering in July. It reproduces by seeds and<br />

vegetatively (Š i l i ć 1990).<br />

Common catalpa is deliberately introduced in Europe as an ornamental plant<br />

and as growing wild it is reported for several countries but mostly only as an<br />

ephemeral escape (e.g. Italy, UK, Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary; P i g n a t i<br />

1982b, G r e u t e r et al. 1984, C l e m e n t s & F o s t e r 1994, E s s l & R a b i t s c<br />

h 2002, P y š e k et al. 2002, B o t o n d & Z o l t a n 2004). It may be more<br />

problematic only in Spain (D a n a et al. 2005 reports its weedy occurrence in<br />

Andalucia) and possibly also an invader in some parts of E Europe<br />

(http://www.sevin.ru/invasive/dbases /plants/species.html), but the definition of “invader” in<br />

the sense of that source is not clear-cut.


159<br />

Stešević, Jogan: Additions to the flora of Montenegro . . .<br />

During the field survey undertaken on June 7, 2007 over the city area of<br />

Podgorica, at the left bank of the River Morača - near Botun, we have found a single<br />

individual of common Catalpa. Due to the fact that this species reproduces by seeds,<br />

we presume that the seed is brought by birds or wind from the nearby gardens where<br />

it is planted as ornamental.<br />

LITERATURE<br />

A E S C H I M A N, D., L A U B E R, K., M O E S E R, D.M., T H E Y R I L L A T, J.P. 2004:<br />

Flora Alpina 1, Haupt. 1159 pp.<br />

B O T O N D, M. & Z O L T Á N, B.D. eds. 2004: Biological Invasions in Hungary. Invasive<br />

Plants. - Természet BUVAR Alapítvány Kiadó<br />

C L A Y T O N, (1980): Setaria Beauv, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 5.,<br />

Cambridge, p. 263-264<br />

C L E M E N T, E.J. & F O S T E R, M.C. 1994: Alien Plants of the British Isles. - Botanical<br />

Society of the British Isles, London. 603 pp.<br />

D A N A, E.D., S A N Z, M., V I V A S, S. and S O B R I N O, E. 2005: Especies Vegetales<br />

Invasoras en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía<br />

D A R M E N C Y H. 2005: Incestuous Relations of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) with<br />

Its Parents and Cousins. In: Gressel J (ed) Crop Ferality and Volunteerism. CRC<br />

Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–96<br />

E S S L, F. & R A B I T S C H, W. eds. 2002: Neobiota in Österreich. - Umweltbundesamt<br />

GmbH, Wien. 432 pp.<br />

F I S C H E R, M. A., W. A D L E R & K. O S W A L D, 2005: Exkursionsflora. Österreich,<br />

Liechtenstein, Südtirol. - Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen,<br />

Linz, 1373 pp.<br />

G R E U T E R, W., B U R D E T, H.M., L O N G, G. eds. 1984: Med-Checklist- Pteridophyta<br />

(ed. 2) Gymnospermae Dicotiledones (Acanthaceae-Cneoraceae), Conservatoire<br />

et jardin botaniques de la Ville de Geneve. 330 pp.<br />

H I T C H C O C K, A. S. 1950: Manual of the Grasses of the United States, 2nd ed.<br />

(Revised by A. Chase.) Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. 1051 pp.<br />

M A R T I N Č I Č, A., T. W R A B E R, N. J O G A N, A. P O D O B N I K, B. T U R K,<br />

B. V R E Š, V. R A V N I K, B. F R A J M A N, S. S T R G U L C K R A J Š E K,<br />

B. T R Č A K, T. B A Č I Č. M. A. F I S C H E R, K. E L E R & B. S U R I N A,<br />

2007: Mala flora Slovenije. 4. izd. Tehniška založba Slovenije, Ljubljana. 845 pp.<br />

M O O R E, D.M. 1968: Impatiens L, in T u t i n at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol. 2.,<br />

Cambridge, p. 240-241<br />

R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21, pp. 506<br />

P I G N A T I, S. 1982a: Flora d’ Italia, vol 3, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 612-613<br />

P I G N A T I, S. 1982b: Flora d’ Italia, vol 2, Edagricole. Bologna. p. 72-73, 618<br />

P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular Flora of Montenegro, Special <strong>edition</strong><br />

of The Republic Institute for Nature Protection of Montenegro, Podgorica. pp.<br />

218


160<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

S L A V N I K, B. 1995: Rod Impatiens v České republice, Preslia 67: 193–211.<br />

P Y Š E K, P., S A L D O, J. & M A N D A K, B. 2002: Catalogue of Alien Plants of the<br />

Check Republic, Preslia 74: 97-186<br />

Š I L I Ć, Č. 1990: Ukrasno drveće i grmlje, IP “Svjetlost”, Zavod za udžbenike i<br />

nastavna sredstva, Sarajevo - Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva,<br />

Beograd, 221 pp.<br />

W I S S K I R C H E N, R. & H A E U P L E R, H. 1998: Standardliste der Farn- und<br />

Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands, Stuttgart: Ulmer, 765 pp.<br />

Received: 14.11.2007


NATURA MONTENEGRINA, PODGORICA, 6:161-163<br />

Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, NEW ALIEN SPECIES IN THE FLORA OF<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

Igor T O M O V I Ć 1) & Danijela STEŠEVIĆ 1) ∗<br />

1) Faculty of Sciences, University of Montenegro, Cetinjski put bb, 81 000 Podgorica, Montenegro<br />

∗ Corresponding author denist@cg.yu<br />

According to two capital papers about the flora of Montenegro R o h l e n a (1942)<br />

& P u l e v i ć (2005) and recently published contributions to the flora of Montenegro<br />

(Stešević 2005, 2006a, 2006b, H a dž i a b l a h o v i ć 2006, etc.), we can conclude<br />

that record of Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke in Berane presents its first record for<br />

the flora of Montenegro.<br />

This South East Asian ornamental plant belogs to family Rosaceae. It is<br />

characterized by perennial herbaceous form, with epigeal rooting stolons. Stem is up<br />

to 50cm; leaves are trifoliate, rather long petiolate, with obovate, crenate leaflets and<br />

lanceolate stipules; flowers are yellow, solitary nor or slightly exceeding the leaves;<br />

sepals are 10mm, epicalyx segments broadly ovate, exceeding the sepals; petals 8<br />

mm; receptacle strongly, bright red, tasteless (V a l e n t i n e 1968).<br />

Due to the its ecological preferences (J a c k o w i a k 1992; L a u b e r & W a g n e r<br />

2001) species mostly inhabits relatively moist, nitrophilous and shaded habitats.<br />

At the first sight it looks likes native strawberry. Characters that clearly<br />

distinguish these species are given in table below:<br />

Native strawberry (Fragaria)<br />

Sepals are nearly equal<br />

Flowers are white<br />

Fruits are juicy, sweet and with pleasant<br />

aroma<br />

Indian strawberry (Duchesnea)<br />

Outer sepals are bigger that inner<br />

Flowers are yellow<br />

Fruits are juicy, sour and without aroma<br />

Photos by: Danijela Stešević


162<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007<br />

Duchesnea has worldwide distribution. According to W e b e r (2003)<br />

geographical regions where it grows as native are: Northern Europe (Scandinavia:<br />

Finland, Norway, Sweden); British Isles; Central Europe (Austria, Benelux states,<br />

Denmark, France without the Mediterranean border, Germany, Switzerland); Southern<br />

Europe (Southern France, Greece, Italy, Spain); Eastern Europe (all European states<br />

east of Austria, Germany, Italy); European part of Russia, European part of Turkey,<br />

Mediterranean Islands; Northern Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco); Tropical<br />

Africa (All African states between northern and southern Africa); Southern Africa<br />

(Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland); Temperate Asia (Middle East, China,<br />

Japan, Asian part of Russia); Tropical Asia (India, Sri Lanka, all states east of India<br />

and bordering the south of China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines); Australia, New<br />

Zealand, Canada + Alaska; South-eastern USA (States of continental USA bordering<br />

the Gulf of Mexico: Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, eastern Texas); Western<br />

USA (States of continental USA bordering the Pacific Ocean); Remaining USA (All<br />

states of continental USA between western and south-eastern USA); Mexico; Tropical<br />

South America (all states of continental South America beyond Mexico and except<br />

Argentina, Chile, Uruguay); Chile; Argentina; Cape Verde; Canary + Madeira; Azores;<br />

South Atlantic Islands; Madagascar and Hawaii.<br />

It is presumed that its introduction in Europe dates from the beginning of 19 th<br />

Century (http://uk.encarta.msn.com/media_1481569451_781532557-1_1/Introduced_<br />

Species_in_Europe.html).<br />

First record of Duchesnea indica for the territory of former Yugoslavia (village<br />

Turčin, near Varaždin in Croatia) was reported by T r i n a j s t i ć (1973). In his opinion<br />

species started to spread spontaneously from Graz (Austria), via valley of river Drava.<br />

For current distribution of Duchesnea in Croatia see Flora Croatica Database<br />

(http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd/).<br />

Data about distribution of Indian strawberry in Slovenia are available in J o g a n<br />

(2001).<br />

In the region species is also reported in Serbia (J o v a n o v i ć , 1994).<br />

At the territory of Montenegro spontaneously growing population of Duchesnea<br />

indica is found in periurban area of Berane, at shady ruderal habitat type. Pathway of<br />

its arrival remains unknown. Considering the fact that in Berane and in surrounding<br />

area, Indian strawberry is not planted as ornamental plant, we exclude the possibility<br />

that it escaped from cultivation.<br />

We believe that further data about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region<br />

will help us to create precise hypothesis about the pathway of its arrival and spread<br />

over the territory of Montenegro.<br />

Acknowledgement: We would like to thank Prof. Vlado Matevski and dr. Ljiljana Topalić for<br />

valuable communications about distribution of Duchesnea indica in the region.


163<br />

Tomović, Stešević: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, new alien species in the flora of Montenegro<br />

LITERATURE<br />

H A DŽ I A B L A H O V I Ć, S. 2006: Floristic and chorological additions to the vascular<br />

flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the II International Symposium of Ecologists<br />

of the Republic of Montenegro, p. 93-101<br />

J A C K O W I A K, B. 1992: On the distribution of Duchesnea indica (Rosaceae) in<br />

Vienna. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 37: 593-547.<br />

J O G A N, N. ed. 2001: Materials for the Atlas of Flora of Slovenia, Centre for<br />

Cartography of fauna and flora, Ljubljana, pp. 443<br />

J O V A N O V I Ć, S. 1994: Ecological study of ruderal flora and vegetation of Belgrade,<br />

Faculty of Biology, University in Belgrade, 222 pp.<br />

L A U B E R, K. & W A G N E R, G. 2001: Flora Helvetica, Paul Haupt ed., Bern-<br />

Stuttgart-Wien, 1615 pp.<br />

R O H L E N A, J. 1941-1942: Conspectus Florae Montenegrinae, Preslia 20-21<br />

P U L E V I Ć, V. 2005: Materials for the Vascular flora of Montenegro. - Special <strong>edition</strong><br />

of Republic institute for Nature Protetion of Montenegro, Podgorica, 218 pp.<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O V A N O V I Ć S. 2005b: Contribution to the knowledge of non<br />

indigenous flora of Montenegro, Proceedings of the Workshop devoted to 25 th<br />

Anniversary of the Faculty of Sciences nad Mathematics, University of<br />

Montenegro, Podgorica 8-9 September 2005, p. 65-78<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. 2006a: Gagea chrysantha (Jan) Schultes & Schultes fil. and Linaria<br />

genistifolia (L.) Miller subsp. genistifolia two new taxon in the flora of<br />

Montenegro. - Proceedings of II Interanational Symposium of Ecologist of the<br />

Republic of Montenegro, Kotor 20-24. September 2006, p. 69-72<br />

S T E Š E V I Ć, D. & J O G A N, N. 2006a: Two new neophytes in the flora of<br />

Montenegro: Artemisia verlotiorum and Sporobolus vaginiflorus. - Natura<br />

Montenegrina, 5: 173-175<br />

T R I N A J S T I Ć, I. 1973: Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke (Rosaceae), nova<br />

adventivna vrsta u flori Jugoslavije.- Acta Botanica Croatica 32: 261-266, Zagreb<br />

V A L E N T I N E, D. H. 1968: Duchesnea Sm., in Tutin at al. eds. Flora Europaea vol.<br />

2., Cambridge, p. 48<br />

W E B E R, E. 2003: Invasive plant species of the world. A reference guide to<br />

environmental weeds. - CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 560 pp.<br />

Received: 14.11.2007


164<br />

Natura Montenegrina, SHORT COMMUNICATION, 6/2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!