26.05.2014 Views

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Item 18, Annex 1<br />

assessments. Mr Budge explained the process by which issues of<br />

concern arising from external assessments were elevated, via the<br />

Assurance Framework, to the <strong>Trust</strong> Board.<br />

There were no questions <strong>and</strong> the Committee noted the report.<br />

53/13 Safety <strong>and</strong> Quality Committee<br />

Minutes of the April 2013<br />

D<br />

meeting were noted by the Committee.<br />

54/13 Finance, Performance & Investment Committee<br />

Minutes of the April 2013 meeting <strong>and</strong> minutes of the ‘commercial-inconfidence’<br />

section of the April 2013 meeting were noted by the<br />

Committee.<br />

R<br />

55/13 Human Resources & Organisational Development Committee<br />

Minutes of the April 2013 meeting were noted by the Committee.<br />

56/13 Audit Chair’s Report<br />

A<br />

to the Board<br />

It was agreed that this would cover:<br />

• CQC Outcome 21 review.<br />

• Bevan Brittan risk update.<br />

F<br />

• Approval of the accounts <strong>and</strong> associated documentation review<br />

<strong>and</strong> recommendations to the Board.<br />

57/13 Review <strong>and</strong> Learning<br />

As agreed at the May meeting, this item featured a discussion to<br />

extract learning from<br />

T<br />

a topical issue <strong>and</strong> on this occasion it was the<br />

Committee’s relationship with Internal Audit. Prior to the meeting<br />

there had been a Board session to agree Internal Audit’s work plan for<br />

2013/14. The Committee reflected on the following questions:<br />

• Does the Audit Committee underst<strong>and</strong> its relationship with<br />

Internal Audit?<br />

• How are we assured that reports are thorough?<br />

• Is the Audit Committee sufficiently proactive?<br />

• Could we use what they tell us more efficiently?<br />

• How can we improve triangulation?<br />

The Committee agreed that its underst<strong>and</strong>ing of its relationship with<br />

Internal Audit had improved as a result of the pre-meeting session <strong>and</strong><br />

particularly through questioning during the meeting. The Committee<br />

gained assurance on thoroughness through challenge <strong>and</strong> audit<br />

scope <strong>and</strong> agreed that there was a requirement for significant<br />

management attention at the start of the process. It would be helpful<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!