26.05.2014 Views

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

Agenda and supporting papers - Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Item 3<br />

been involved <strong>and</strong> there was service line support. Mr Brown<br />

stated that the proposals had been routed through the relevant<br />

clinical groups to ensure support.<br />

• Dr Williams stated that the Board could not be sure that these<br />

proposals would save money <strong>and</strong> be better for patients.<br />

Success would be dependent on a tight grip on the associated<br />

operational issues. The discharge element, which was<br />

dependent on<br />

D<br />

other parties, was crucial <strong>and</strong> there was limited<br />

assurance that this would be delivered in the short term.<br />

• Mr Teape identified the requirement for a clear audit trail for<br />

admissions/discharges to be shared with commissioners. Mr<br />

Teape <strong>and</strong> Mr Baber would shape this.<br />

R<br />

• Mrs Raikes asked whether this investment would add to the<br />

existing CIP programme. Mr Teape stated that it would not <strong>and</strong><br />

that the costs were included in the £5m ‘investment for quality’<br />

projects discussed at the May Board.<br />

• Successful nurse<br />

A<br />

recruitment was crucial to the plan’s success,<br />

both operationally <strong>and</strong> financially. Mr Dix stated that nurse<br />

recruitment was just keeping pace with internal turnover <strong>and</strong> it<br />

was likely that it would be necessary recruit internationally.<br />

Whilst Ms James agreed in principle, she felt there was more<br />

that could be done in local advertising <strong>and</strong> this should be<br />

pursued.<br />

F<br />

Concluding the Board’s discussions, Ms James stated that the Senior<br />

Management Team must develop range of KPIs for Board level<br />

oversight. Agreement of these proposals would send confirmation to<br />

staff that the Board had listened <strong>and</strong> acted on two of their concerns:<br />

T<br />

• The importance of minimising patient <strong>and</strong> staff moves to meet<br />

operational imperatives.<br />

•<br />

The Board:<br />

The importance of <strong>supporting</strong> staff to deliver the consistently<br />

high levels of care that they would wish.<br />

• Noted the internal actions being taken to support<br />

improvements within the ED pathway <strong>and</strong> improve<br />

hospital-wide support for patients within the ED.<br />

• Noted the community-wide actions required to support<br />

hospital based Emergency Care in the longer term.<br />

• Approved the actions described within the Bed<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> the associated investment necessary to<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!