24.05.2014 Views

ateam - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

ateam - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

ateam - Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ATEAM final report Section 5 and 6 (2001-2004) 44<br />

<br />

<br />

the consideration of the interactions between land use, climate and policy; and,<br />

the need to bridge the gap between the current modelling scales and the scales relevant to policy<br />

and decision-makers.<br />

The 3 rd and final Stakeholder Workshop, May 2004, <strong>Potsdam</strong>, Germany<br />

The final workshop was attended by 13 Stakeholders, 12 ATEAMers and 3 observers. In contrast to all<br />

other events, this time only accommodation and meals, but not the travelling costs were paid <strong>for</strong><br />

stakeholders, due to budget constraints. We consider it a very positive signal that 13 stakeholders paid<br />

their own travel to participate in this final event. As be<strong>for</strong>e, ATEAMers had an internal meeting prior to<br />

the event to finalise preparation and harmonise the communication strategy.<br />

The aim of the final workshop was to present and discuss near final results on potential impacts of<br />

global change on ecosystem services and sectors, sectoral adaptive capacity and resulting vulnerability.<br />

Furthermore, the ATEAM digital atlas of these results, the so-called mapping tool was presented and<br />

discussed.<br />

In view of the potential impacts of global change on ecosystem services as calculated by ATEAM,<br />

sectoral adaptation was considered and debated. The ATEAM mapping tool was demonstrated and<br />

stakeholders commented on how this could be improved. Stakeholders usually praised the ATEAM<br />

goal, approach and preliminary results. The in<strong>for</strong>mation on potential impacts per ecosystem service per<br />

se was judged more useful however than an aggregated indicator of vulnerability (including a macroscale<br />

indicator on adaptive capacity). This suggests that vulnerability as a concept and its quantification<br />

may be of more scientific than social relevance. It could indicate that stakeholders are very well aware<br />

of the adaptive capacity of their sector and need primarily to understand the risk their activities face in<br />

the context of global change.<br />

The need to include explicitly policy alternatives and their potential effect on ecosystem services, and to<br />

explore ways to attach probabilities to specific scenarios was highlighted. More transparent<br />

documentation was asked so as to understand adequately how the results were obtained and thus<br />

better judge their meaningfulness. This is especially important since the ATEAM mapping tool will<br />

potentially store 2500 maps. The mapping tool in itself was judged interesting and innovative, although<br />

stakeholders did not think they could use it in their daily decision-making and/or management work.<br />

Ef<strong>for</strong>ts to synthesise the in<strong>for</strong>mation gained by the maps would be valuable and would increase the<br />

dissemination and use of the ATEAM results.<br />

Sectoral meetings<br />

Agriculture and biomass energy, February 2002, Paris, France<br />

Participants: 3 stakeholders from agricultural and agronomical research institutes, 2 ATEAMers.<br />

Aim: to discuss the ATEAM vulnerability assessment framework, scenarios and possible model outputs<br />

specific <strong>for</strong> agriculture, biomass energy and carbon storage.<br />

A small bioenergy stakeholder workshop was held in January 2002 in France as a direct follow-up of the<br />

first annual stakeholder workshop, where the need <strong>for</strong> a smaller meeting became apparent and the<br />

event was planned. It focused on issues relating to agriculture, biomass energy and carbon storage.<br />

Three stakeholders from agricultural and agronomical research institutes were introduced to the ATEAM<br />

vulnerability assessment framework, scenarios and possible model outputs <strong>for</strong> their sector. The<br />

bioenergy workshop provided useful insight in to some of the areas of interest of stakeholders, and<br />

some ideas of how to proceed with inclusion of bioenergy within ATEAM modelling and analysis. Most<br />

of the bioenergy modelling was planned to be carried out as part of the agricultural sector as this was<br />

where ideas, methodologies and resources were most well suited.<br />

Mountain ecosystems and their services, November 2002, Kappel, Switzerland<br />

Participants: 6 Stakeholders whose activities were concerned with Alpine ecosystem services (e.g.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!