Workshop book - Physikzentrum der RWTH Aachen - RWTH Aachen ...
Workshop book - Physikzentrum der RWTH Aachen - RWTH Aachen ... Workshop book - Physikzentrum der RWTH Aachen - RWTH Aachen ...
Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 42: Current correlations in the interacting Cooper-pair beam-splitter Jerome Rech We propose an approach allowing the computation of currents and their correlations in interacting multi-terminal mesoscopic systems involving quantum dots coupled to normal and/or superconducting leads [1]. The formalism relies on the expression of branching currents and noise crossed correlations in terms of one- and two-particle Green’s functions for the dots electrons, which are then evaluated self-consistently within a conserving approximation [2]. We illustrate our method with the Cooper-pair beam-splitter setup recently proposed [3], which we model as a double quantum dot with weak interactions, connected to a superconducting lead and two normal ones. Our method not only enables us to take into account a local repulsive interaction on the dots, but also to study its competition with the direct tunneling between dots. Our results suggest that even a weak Coulomb repulsion tends to favor positive current cross correlations in the antisymmetric regime (where the dots have opposite energies with respect to the superconducting chemical potential). Poster 43: Controlling entanglement and spin-correlations in double quantum dots using non-equilibrium currents Carlos Busser We study the non-equilibrium dynamics in a parallel double-quantum dot structure induced by a large bias voltage. By applying both a magnetic flux and a voltage, it is possible to generate spin-spin-correlations between the two quantum dots, whose sign and absolute value can be controlled by changing the bias voltage. Our study is based on the Anderson-impurity model and we use time-dependent density matrix renormalization group simulations to obtain currents and spin-correlations in the non-equilibrium regime. 84
List of participants 1. Yulieth Cristina Arango, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany y.arango@fz-juelich.de 2. Christian Bartsch, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany c.bartsch@tu-braunschweig.de 3. Bernd Beschoten, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany bernd.beschoten@physik.rwth-aachen.de 4. Stefan Blügel, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany s.bluegel@fz-juelich.de 5. Aldo Brunetti, Heinrich Heine Univerität - Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany brunetti@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de 6. Carlos Busser, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany C.Buesser@physik.uni-muenchen.de 7. Hernan Calvo, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany hcalvo@physik.rwth-aachen.de 8. Theo Costi, Research Centre Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany t.costi@fz-juelich.de 9. Silvano De Franceschi, CEA, Grenoble, France silvano.defranceschi@cea.fr 10. Manuel dos Santos Dias, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany m.dos.santos.dias@fz-juelich.de 11. Reinhold Egger, Heinrich Heine Univerität- Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany egger@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de 12. Sigurdur I. Erlingsson, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland sie@ru.is 13. Vladimir Falko, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom v.falko@lancaster.ac.uk 14. Robert Frielinghaus, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany r.frielinghaus@fz-juelich.de 15. Robert Frielinghaus, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany r.frielinghaus@fz-juelich.de 16. Kirsanskas Gediminas, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark gedikirs@nano.ku.dk 17. Thomas Gerster, Fz-Jülich, Jülich, Germany t.gerster@fz-juelich.de 85
- Page 33 and 34: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 33
- Page 35 and 36: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 35
- Page 37 and 38: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 37
- Page 39 and 40: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 39
- Page 41 and 42: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 41
- Page 43 and 44: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 43
- Page 45 and 46: Talks Tuesday February 5 Notes 45
- Page 47 and 48: Talks Wednesday February 6 Talks We
- Page 49 and 50: Talks Wednesday February 6 Notes 49
- Page 51 and 52: Talks Wednesday February 6 Notes 51
- Page 53 and 54: Talks Wednesday February 6 Notes 53
- Page 55: Talks Wednesday February 6 Notes 55
- Page 58 and 59: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 1:
- Page 60 and 61: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 3:
- Page 62 and 63: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 6:
- Page 64 and 65: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 8:
- Page 66 and 67: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 12
- Page 68 and 69: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 15
- Page 70 and 71: Posters Monday February 4 Poster 19
- Page 72 and 73: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 2
- Page 74 and 75: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 2
- Page 76 and 77: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 2
- Page 78 and 79: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 3
- Page 80 and 81: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 3
- Page 82 and 83: Posters Tuesday February 5 Poster 3
- Page 86 and 87: 18. Domenico Giuliano, Universita
- Page 88 and 89: 55. Jens Paaske, Copenhagen Univers
Posters Tuesday February 5<br />
Poster 42:<br />
Current correlations in the interacting Cooper-pair beam-splitter<br />
Jerome Rech<br />
We propose an approach allowing the computation of currents and their correlations<br />
in interacting multi-terminal mesoscopic systems involving quantum<br />
dots coupled to normal and/or superconducting leads [1]. The formalism<br />
relies on the expression of branching currents and noise crossed correlations in<br />
terms of one- and two-particle Green’s functions for the dots electrons, which<br />
are then evaluated self-consistently within a conserving approximation [2].<br />
We illustrate our method with the Cooper-pair beam-splitter setup recently<br />
proposed [3], which we model as a double quantum dot with weak interactions,<br />
connected to a superconducting lead and two normal ones. Our method<br />
not only enables us to take into account a local repulsive interaction on the<br />
dots, but also to study its competition with the direct tunneling between<br />
dots. Our results suggest that even a weak Coulomb repulsion tends to favor<br />
positive current cross correlations in the antisymmetric regime (where the<br />
dots have opposite energies with respect to the superconducting chemical<br />
potential).<br />
Poster 43:<br />
Controlling entanglement and spin-correlations in double quantum dots using<br />
non-equilibrium currents<br />
Carlos Busser<br />
We study the non-equilibrium dynamics in a parallel double-quantum dot<br />
structure induced by a large bias voltage. By applying both a magnetic flux<br />
and a voltage, it is possible to generate spin-spin-correlations between the two<br />
quantum dots, whose sign and absolute value can be controlled by changing<br />
the bias voltage. Our study is based on the An<strong>der</strong>son-impurity model and<br />
we use time-dependent density matrix renormalization group simulations to<br />
obtain currents and spin-correlations in the non-equilibrium regime.<br />
84