23.05.2014 Views

Thermoelectric Properties of Fe0.2Co3.8Sb12-xTex ... - Physics

Thermoelectric Properties of Fe0.2Co3.8Sb12-xTex ... - Physics

Thermoelectric Properties of Fe0.2Co3.8Sb12-xTex ... - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Confinement <strong>of</strong> Spin Waves in Grids <strong>of</strong> Permalloy Nanowires<br />

D. Venkateswarlu<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Physics</strong>, Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Science, Bangalore 560012, India<br />

Key words—electron beam lithography, shape anisotropy, nanowires, FMR, demagnetization fields, micromagnetics.<br />

Recent advances in magnonics highlight its importance<br />

in microwave frequency applications [1] . This involves the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> spin waves for device applications. Here one needs<br />

to look for better control over the spin waves and their band<br />

structure [2-3] . The periodic variation in the effective<br />

magnetic field in ferromagnetic materials is the basis for<br />

the spin wave confinement and their propagation. Since the<br />

effective field is the combination <strong>of</strong> exchange, external,<br />

anisotropy and demagnetization (dipolar/ stray) fields; one<br />

can achieve the periodic condition in many ways. In our<br />

study, we employed geometry engineering by which the<br />

shape anisotropy was tailored in obtaining the periodicity in<br />

demagnetization fields. S<strong>of</strong>t magnetic material permalloy<br />

(Ni 80 Fe 20 ) was made into grid like structure using a top<br />

down approach.<br />

Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements give the<br />

information about the non travelling spin waves (k=0<br />

modes). In general, one can see only single resonance<br />

mode in FMR spectra in the case <strong>of</strong> thin films <strong>of</strong> permalloy.<br />

This is due to its weak crystalline anisotropy even in<br />

epitaxial conditions unlike the Fe thin films [4] . When the<br />

permalloy film is made into nanowires with high aspect<br />

ratio, it still gives the single mode but resonance condition<br />

varies with applied field angles. This is due to the fact that<br />

the shape anisotropy governs the condition for resonance.<br />

This advantage <strong>of</strong> the shape anisotropy points towards the<br />

usefulness <strong>of</strong> engineering the network structures.<br />

Fundamentally one needs to understand the dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

these network structures in order to meet the required<br />

conditions for spin wave band structures in order to use<br />

them in magnonics devices.<br />

The grid structures were fabricated using electron beam<br />

lithography followed by DC magnetron sputtering and lift<strong>of</strong>f<br />

technique. The permalloy deposited on Si wafers was<br />

20nm thick and is capped with 4nm gold to avoid<br />

oxidation. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the deposited materials was<br />

confirmed with the help <strong>of</strong> pre calibrated digital thinness<br />

monitor. The lateral dimensions <strong>of</strong> the grid structures were<br />

obtained using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The<br />

permalloy wires in the grids found with widths about 140-<br />

160nm. To understand the spin wave confinement effect<br />

we varied the periodicities along horizontal and vertical<br />

directions in the grid: (i) 560x560 (G1), (ii) 800x400 (G2)<br />

and (iii) 1000x500 (G3) (all in nm units).<br />

The FMR spectra on all the three grids were compared<br />

with a reference sample, a continuous thin film grown<br />

under same conditions during the fabrication. The<br />

continuous film showed an uni-axial anisotropy. This was<br />

induced due to the in-situ applied field during the growth.<br />

But the magnitude is very small when compared to that <strong>of</strong><br />

structured samples. The quantitative comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

anisotropy constants was obtained with the help <strong>of</strong> fitting<br />

done with theoretical equations involved in FMR<br />

phenomena.<br />

Two well resolved modes were observed in all three<br />

grids whereas the reference sample gave only one mode.<br />

These two modes corresponds to the spin waves confined<br />

in horizontal and vertical sections <strong>of</strong> the grids. Spin wave<br />

confinement was understood with the help <strong>of</strong> the mode<br />

dependency on the in-plane angle <strong>of</strong> the applied magnetic<br />

field with the grid. There were multiple peaks observed at<br />

some angles in the G2, G3 which is not seen in G1.<br />

The origin for these multiple peaks is understood with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> static micromagnetic simulations (MMS).<br />

Dynamics <strong>of</strong> G1 using MMS followed by Discrete Fast<br />

Fourier Transformations were used to correlate FMR<br />

spectra. Our simulations methodology gave more insight<br />

into the understanding <strong>of</strong> spin waves confinement. The<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> 2D-PBC [5] in our MMS made it possible<br />

to study the real systems in realistic time.<br />

Fig.1 Spin wave confinement in the horizontal and vertical<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> the G1.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] V. V. Kruglyak et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., vol. 43, p.<br />

264001, 2010.<br />

[2] Z. K. Wang et al., Acs Nano, vol. 4, p. 643, 2010.<br />

[3] K. S. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., v. 102, p. 127202, 2009.<br />

[4] S. Sakshath et al., J. Supercond. Nov. Magn.,<br />

DOI:10.1007/s10948-011-1269-3<br />

[5] D. Venkateswarlu et al., IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 48, no.<br />

11, Nov. 2012.<br />

FMR experiments were done in collaboration with Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. V. Bhat<br />

D.Venkat@physics.iisc.ernet.in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!