3. Lectures of Superconductivity given at Palai - Physics - Indian ...
3. Lectures of Superconductivity given at Palai - Physics - Indian ... 3. Lectures of Superconductivity given at Palai - Physics - Indian ...
Superconductivity A nine-hour journey Vijay B. Shenoy (shenoy@physics.iisc.ernet.in) Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore St. Thomas College, Palai, March 11, 2011 1 / 41
- Page 2 and 3: Acknowledgement 2 / 41
- Page 4 and 5: Acknowledgement Collaborators: Sand
- Page 6 and 7: Motivation: Why Bother? 3 / 41
- Page 8 and 9: Motivation: Why Bother? Superconduc
- Page 10 and 11: Motivation: Why Bother? Superconduc
- Page 12 and 13: Motivation: Why Bother? Superconduc
- Page 14 and 15: Motivation: Why Bother? Superconduc
- Page 16 and 17: Overall Plan of the Lectures Goal:
- Page 18 and 19: Overall Plan of the Lectures Goal:
- Page 20 and 21: Overall Plan of the Lectures Goal:
- Page 22 and 23: Overall Plan of the Lectures Goal:
- Page 24 and 25: Prerequisites 5 / 41
- Page 26 and 27: Prerequisites Must: ◮ Understandi
- Page 28 and 29: Prerequisites Must: ◮ Understandi
- Page 30 and 31: Prerequisites Must: ◮ Understandi
- Page 32 and 33: Prerequisites Must: ◮ Understandi
- Page 34 and 35: References Ramakrishnan, T. V. and
- Page 36 and 37: References Ramakrishnan, T. V. and
- Page 38 and 39: References Ramakrishnan, T. V. and
- Page 40 and 41: References Ramakrishnan, T. V. and
- Page 42 and 43: What Participants Should Expect to
- Page 44 and 45: What Participants Should Expect to
- Page 46 and 47: What Participants Should Expect to
- Page 48 and 49: What Participants Should Expect to
- Page 50 and 51: How it all Started! Kamerlingh Onne
<strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
A nine-hour journey<br />
Vijay B. Shenoy<br />
(shenoy@physics.iisc.ernet.in)<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Science, Bangalore<br />
St. Thomas College, <strong>Palai</strong>, March 11, 2011<br />
1 / 41
Acknowledgement<br />
2 / 41
Acknowledgement<br />
Collabor<strong>at</strong>ors: Sandeep P<strong>at</strong>hak, Somn<strong>at</strong>h Bhowmick, Jayanth<br />
Vyasanakere, Yogeshwar Sarasw<strong>at</strong>, Sudeep Ghosh, Amal Medhi,<br />
Shizhong Zhang<br />
2 / 41
Acknowledgement<br />
Collabor<strong>at</strong>ors: Sandeep P<strong>at</strong>hak, Somn<strong>at</strong>h Bhowmick, Jayanth<br />
Vyasanakere, Yogeshwar Sarasw<strong>at</strong>, Sudeep Ghosh, Amal Medhi,<br />
Shizhong Zhang<br />
Thanks to: H. R. Krishnamurthy (IISc), T. V. Ramakrishnan<br />
(BHU/IISc), M. Randeria (OSU), N. Trivedi (OSU), G. Baskaran<br />
(IMSc), R. Shankar (IMSc), T.-L. Ho (OSU)<br />
2 / 41
Acknowledgement<br />
Collabor<strong>at</strong>ors: Sandeep P<strong>at</strong>hak, Somn<strong>at</strong>h Bhowmick, Jayanth<br />
Vyasanakere, Yogeshwar Sarasw<strong>at</strong>, Sudeep Ghosh, Amal Medhi,<br />
Shizhong Zhang<br />
Thanks to: H. R. Krishnamurthy (IISc), T. V. Ramakrishnan<br />
(BHU/IISc), M. Randeria (OSU), N. Trivedi (OSU), G. Baskaran<br />
(IMSc), R. Shankar (IMSc), T.-L. Ho (OSU)<br />
Funding: Department <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Department <strong>of</strong><br />
Atomic Energy<br />
2 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – taught us lots <strong>of</strong> “new physics”<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – taught us lots <strong>of</strong> “new physics”<br />
Ideas applicable from condensed m<strong>at</strong>ter physics, astrophysics, high<br />
energy physics etc.<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – taught us lots <strong>of</strong> “new physics”<br />
Ideas applicable from condensed m<strong>at</strong>ter physics, astrophysics, high<br />
energy physics etc.<br />
...<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – taught us lots <strong>of</strong> “new physics”<br />
Ideas applicable from condensed m<strong>at</strong>ter physics, astrophysics, high<br />
energy physics etc.<br />
...<br />
Above all...<br />
3 / 41
Motiv<strong>at</strong>ion: Why Bother?<br />
Superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance...can distribute power<br />
without losses<br />
“Unfortun<strong>at</strong>ely” superconductivity is a low-temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
phenomenon...need room-temper<strong>at</strong>ure superconductors<br />
...<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – taught us lots <strong>of</strong> “new physics”<br />
Ideas applicable from condensed m<strong>at</strong>ter physics, astrophysics, high<br />
energy physics etc.<br />
...<br />
Above all...it is superinteresting!<br />
3 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
◮ Superconducting phenomenon<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
◮ Superconducting phenomenon<br />
◮ Phenomenological approaches<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
◮ Superconducting phenomenon<br />
◮ Phenomenological approaches<br />
◮ Microscopic theory<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
◮ Superconducting phenomenon<br />
◮ Phenomenological approaches<br />
◮ Microscopic theory<br />
◮ Superconducting effects<br />
4 / 41
Overall Plan <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Lectures</strong><br />
Goal: To prepare ourselves to know when to be surprised<br />
Six lectures will be organized as:<br />
◮ Review <strong>of</strong> metal physics<br />
◮ Superconducting phenomenon<br />
◮ Phenomenological approaches<br />
◮ Microscopic theory<br />
◮ Superconducting effects<br />
◮ Current problems – from Curp<strong>at</strong>es to Cold Atoms<br />
4 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
◮ St<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics and thermodynamics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel and<br />
Kromer)<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
◮ St<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics and thermodynamics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel and<br />
Kromer)<br />
Desirable:<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
◮ St<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics and thermodynamics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel and<br />
Kromer)<br />
Desirable:<br />
◮ Solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel)<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
◮ St<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics and thermodynamics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel and<br />
Kromer)<br />
Desirable:<br />
◮ Solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel)<br />
◮ Ideas <strong>of</strong> Phase Tansitions (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Yeomans)<br />
5 / 41
Prerequisites<br />
Must:<br />
◮ Understanding <strong>of</strong> classical mechanics and electrodynamics<br />
◮ Working knowledge <strong>of</strong> quantum mechanics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Griffiths)<br />
◮ St<strong>at</strong>istical mechanics and thermodynamics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel and<br />
Kromer)<br />
Desirable:<br />
◮ Solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Kittel)<br />
◮ Ideas <strong>of</strong> Phase Tansitions (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Yeomans)<br />
◮ Ideas <strong>of</strong> “Second quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion” (<strong>at</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> Ziman)<br />
5 / 41
References<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Tinkham, M., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Standard text book, very nice in<br />
parts<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Tinkham, M., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Standard text book, very nice in<br />
parts<br />
de Gennes, P., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> Metals and Alloys – My favourite<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Tinkham, M., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Standard text book, very nice in<br />
parts<br />
de Gennes, P., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> Metals and Alloys – My favourite<br />
Leggett, A. J., Quantum Liquids – A very original and wonderfully<br />
clear exposition from a Nobel laure<strong>at</strong>e –a must read!<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Tinkham, M., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Standard text book, very nice in<br />
parts<br />
de Gennes, P., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> Metals and Alloys – My favourite<br />
Leggett, A. J., Quantum Liquids – A very original and wonderfully<br />
clear exposition from a Nobel laure<strong>at</strong>e –a must read!<br />
Parks, R. D. (Editor), <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Wonderful collection <strong>of</strong><br />
chapters by the well known authors<br />
6 / 41
References<br />
Ramakrishnan, T. V. and Rao, C. N. R., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> Today –<br />
an excellent elementary introduction to superconductivity<br />
Ibach, H. and Lüth, H., Solid St<strong>at</strong>e <strong>Physics</strong> – contains a very nice<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> superconductivity (and many other solid st<strong>at</strong>e physics<br />
topics)<br />
Tilley and Tilley, <strong>Superconductivity</strong> and Superfluidity – a very nice<br />
approach with a unified view <strong>of</strong> superfluidity <strong>of</strong> 4 He and<br />
superconductivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Tinkham, M., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Standard text book, very nice in<br />
parts<br />
de Gennes, P., <strong>Superconductivity</strong> <strong>of</strong> Metals and Alloys – My favourite<br />
Leggett, A. J., Quantum Liquids – A very original and wonderfully<br />
clear exposition from a Nobel laure<strong>at</strong>e –a must read!<br />
Parks, R. D. (Editor), <strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Wonderful collection <strong>of</strong><br />
chapters by the well known authors<br />
Bennemann, K. H. and Ketterson, J. B. (Editors), <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
– Modern version <strong>of</strong> Parks<br />
6 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> phenomenological theories based on phenomena<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> phenomenological theories based on phenomena<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> broken symmetry and phase transition<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> phenomenological theories based on phenomena<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> broken symmetry and phase transition<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> mean field theory (both “quantum” and “st<strong>at</strong>istical”)<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> phenomenological theories based on phenomena<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> broken symmetry and phase transition<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> mean field theory (both “quantum” and “st<strong>at</strong>istical”)<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> macroscopic quantum phenomenon<br />
7 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> Participants Should Expect to Gain<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
An understanding <strong>of</strong> the phenomenology <strong>of</strong> superconductivity in<br />
metals...and why is it surprising<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> phenomenological theories based on phenomena<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> broken symmetry and phase transition<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> mean field theory (both “quantum” and “st<strong>at</strong>istical”)<br />
Ideas <strong>of</strong> macroscopic quantum phenomenon<br />
A glimpse <strong>of</strong> some open problems...in particular why the cupr<strong>at</strong>es are<br />
fascin<strong>at</strong>ing<br />
7 / 41
How it all Started!<br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
8 / 41
How it all Started!<br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
8 / 41
How it all Started!<br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
8 / 41
How it all Started!<br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
Discovered (1911) th<strong>at</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> mercury drops to “zero”<br />
below 4.2K!<br />
8 / 41
How it all Started!<br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
Discovered (1911) th<strong>at</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> mercury drops to “zero”<br />
below 4.2K!<br />
Aptly called superconductivity Not sure: By whom?<br />
8 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
9 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
9 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
...perhaps under duress!<br />
9 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> Period Table<br />
Periodic Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Some elements have to be pressurised!<br />
(dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to the memory <strong>of</strong> Bernd M<strong>at</strong>thias)<br />
30 elements superconduct <strong>at</strong> ambient pressure, 23 more superconduct <strong>at</strong> high pressure.<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
10 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> Period Table<br />
Periodic Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Some elements have to be pressurised!<br />
(dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to the memory <strong>of</strong> Bernd M<strong>at</strong>thias)<br />
30 elements superconduct <strong>at</strong> ambient pressure, 23 more superconduct <strong>at</strong> high pressure.<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
10 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
11 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
11 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
Key observ<strong>at</strong>ion: Almost all metallic elements and alloys become<br />
superconducting Question: Can an insul<strong>at</strong>or become a superconductor?<br />
11 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
Key observ<strong>at</strong>ion: Almost all metallic elements and alloys become<br />
superconducting Question: Can an insul<strong>at</strong>or become a superconductor?<br />
Need to understand wh<strong>at</strong> a metal is!<br />
11 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal? – Survey <strong>of</strong> Metallic Properties<br />
12 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal? – Survey <strong>of</strong> Metallic Properties<br />
Thermodynamic properties<br />
12 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal? – Survey <strong>of</strong> Metallic Properties<br />
Thermodynamic properties<br />
Magnetic properties<br />
12 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal? – Survey <strong>of</strong> Metallic Properties<br />
Thermodynamic properties<br />
Magnetic properties<br />
Transport properties<br />
12 / 41
Metals – Thermodynamic Properties<br />
13 / 41
Metals – Thermodynamic 6.4 Properties The Specific He<strong>at</strong> Capacity <strong>of</strong> Electrons in Me<br />
Fig. 6.8. Plot <strong>of</strong> c v /T (Ibach againstand T 2 Lüth) for copper. The experimental points (*<br />
from two separ<strong>at</strong>e measurements [6.3]<br />
Table 6.2. Comparison <strong>of</strong> experimentally determined values <strong>of</strong> the coe cien<br />
nic specific he<strong>at</strong> with values calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using the free-electron-gas model. At<br />
13 / 41<br />
3 3
Metals – Thermodynamic 6.4 Properties The Specific He<strong>at</strong> Capacity <strong>of</strong> Electrons in Me<br />
Fig. 6.8. Plot <strong>of</strong> c v /T (Ibach againstand T 2 Lüth) for copper. The experimental points (*<br />
from two separ<strong>at</strong>e measurements [6.3]<br />
Low temper<strong>at</strong>ure specific he<strong>at</strong> goes as<br />
Table 6.2. ComparisonC <strong>of</strong> V<br />
metal experimentally = βT 3 + γT determined values <strong>of</strong> the coe cien<br />
nic specific he<strong>at</strong> with values calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using the free-electron-gas model. At<br />
13 / 41<br />
3 3
Metals – Magnetic Properties<br />
14 / 41
Metals – Magnetic Properties<br />
Focus on “non-magnetic” metals<br />
14 / 41
Metals – Magnetic Properties<br />
Focus on “non-magnetic” metals<br />
14 / 41
Metals – Magnetic Properties<br />
Focus on “non-magnetic” metals<br />
Magnetic susceptibility is essentially independent <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure!<br />
14 / 41
tribution R ph (T)!1/r ph to the resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals:<br />
Metals – DC Electrical H=T …<br />
Transport<br />
x 5 dx<br />
R ph …T† ˆA…T=H† 5<br />
At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, this varies as T<br />
Electrical resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
5 .<br />
0<br />
…e x 1†…1 e x †<br />
…9:62†<br />
260 9 Motion <strong>of</strong> Electrons and Transport Phenomen<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 9.7. R<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppersitions.<br />
(A<br />
Fig. 9.6. Electrical resistance <strong>of</strong> sodium compared to the value <strong>at</strong> 290 K as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure. The d<strong>at</strong>a points (*, *, `) were measured for three different samples with<br />
differing defect concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. (After [9.3])<br />
According to (9.59) we can write the resistivit<br />
as the sum <strong>of</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure-independent residual<br />
fects) and a part due to phonon sc<strong>at</strong>tering R ph (T)<br />
ture <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />
R ˆ R ph …T†‡R def :<br />
This behavior, which was first identified experim<br />
thiesen's Rule. Note th<strong>at</strong> (9.63) is valid only appro<br />
Figure 9.6 shows the experimentally measured 15 / 41
tribution R ph (T)!1/r ph to the resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals:<br />
Metals – DC Electrical H=T …<br />
Transport<br />
x 5 dx<br />
R ph …T† ˆA…T=H† 5<br />
At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, this varies as T<br />
Electrical resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
5 .<br />
0<br />
…e x 1†…1 e x †<br />
…9:62†<br />
260 9 Motion <strong>of</strong> Electrons and Transport Phenomen<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 9.7. R<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppersitions.<br />
(A<br />
Fig. 9.6. Electrical resistance <strong>of</strong> sodium compared to the value <strong>at</strong> 290 K as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure. The d<strong>at</strong>a points (*, *, `) were measured for three different samples with<br />
differing defect concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. (After [9.3])<br />
According to (9.59) we can write the resistivit<br />
as the sum <strong>of</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure-independent residual<br />
fects) and a part due to phonon sc<strong>at</strong>tering R ph (T)<br />
ture <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />
R ˆ R ph …T†‡R def :<br />
This behavior, which was first identified experim<br />
thiesen's Rule. Note th<strong>at</strong> (9.63) is valid only appro<br />
Figure 9.6 shows the experimentally measured 15 / 41<br />
Resistivity regimes
tribution R ph (T)!1/r ph to the resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals:<br />
Metals – DC Electrical H=T …<br />
Transport<br />
x 5 dx<br />
R ph …T† ˆA…T=H† 5<br />
At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, this varies as T<br />
Electrical resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
5 .<br />
0<br />
…e x 1†…1 e x †<br />
…9:62†<br />
260 9 Motion <strong>of</strong> Electrons and Transport Phenomen<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 9.7. R<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppersitions.<br />
(A<br />
Fig. 9.6. Electrical resistance <strong>of</strong> sodium compared to the value <strong>at</strong> 290 K as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure. The d<strong>at</strong>a points (*, *, `) were measured for three different samples with<br />
differing defect concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. (After [9.3])<br />
According to (9.59) we can write the resistivit<br />
as the sum <strong>of</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure-independent residual<br />
ρ = ρ 0 + A 1 T 2 “Low Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
fects) and a part due to phonon sc<strong>at</strong>tering R ph (T)<br />
ture <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />
ρ = ρ 0 + A 2 T 5 “Intermedi<strong>at</strong>e Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
R ˆ R ph …T†‡R def :<br />
ρ = ρ<br />
This behavior, which was first identified experim<br />
0 + A 3 T “High Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
thiesen's Rule. Note th<strong>at</strong> (9.63) is valid only appro<br />
Figure 9.6 shows the experimentally measured<br />
Resistivity regimes
tribution R ph (T)!1/r ph to the resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals:<br />
Metals – DC Electrical H=T …<br />
Transport<br />
x 5 dx<br />
R ph …T† ˆA…T=H† 5<br />
At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, this varies as T<br />
Electrical resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
5 .<br />
0<br />
…e x 1†…1 e x †<br />
…9:62†<br />
260 9 Motion <strong>of</strong> Electrons and Transport Phenomen<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 9.7. R<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppersitions.<br />
(A<br />
Fig. 9.6. Electrical resistance <strong>of</strong> sodium compared to the value <strong>at</strong> 290 K as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure. The d<strong>at</strong>a points (*, *, `) were measured for three different samples with<br />
differing defect concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. (After [9.3])<br />
According to (9.59) we can write the resistivit<br />
as the sum <strong>of</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure-independent residual<br />
ρ = ρ 0 + A 1 T 2 “Low Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
fects) and a part due to phonon sc<strong>at</strong>tering R ph (T)<br />
ture <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />
R ˆ R ph …T†‡R def :<br />
ρ = ρ<br />
This behavior, which was first identified experim<br />
0 + A 3 T “High Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
thiesen's Rule. Note th<strong>at</strong> (9.63) is valid only appro<br />
Figure 9.6 shows the experimentally measured<br />
Resistivity regimes
tribution R ph (T)!1/r ph to the resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals:<br />
Metals – DC Electrical H=T …<br />
Transport<br />
x 5 dx<br />
R ph …T† ˆA…T=H† 5<br />
At low temper<strong>at</strong>ures, this varies as T<br />
Electrical resistivity <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
5 .<br />
0<br />
…e x 1†…1 e x †<br />
…9:62†<br />
260 9 Motion <strong>of</strong> Electrons and Transport Phenomen<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 9.7. R<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppersitions.<br />
(A<br />
Fig. 9.6. Electrical resistance <strong>of</strong> sodium compared to the value <strong>at</strong> 290 K as a function <strong>of</strong><br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure. The d<strong>at</strong>a points (*, *, `) were measured for three different samples with<br />
differing defect concentr<strong>at</strong>ions. (After [9.3])<br />
According to (9.59) we can write the resistivit<br />
as the sum <strong>of</strong> a temper<strong>at</strong>ure-independent residual<br />
ρ = ρ 0 + A 1 T 2 “Low Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
fects) and a part due to phonon sc<strong>at</strong>tering R ph (T)<br />
ture <strong>at</strong> high temper<strong>at</strong>ure:<br />
ρ = ρ 0 + A 2 T 5 “Intermedi<strong>at</strong>e Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
R ˆ R ph …T†‡R def :<br />
ρ = ρ<br />
This behavior, which was first identified experim<br />
0 + A 3 T “High Temper<strong>at</strong>ure”<br />
thiesen's Rule. Note th<strong>at</strong> (9.63) is valid only appro<br />
Figure 9.6 shows the experimentally measured 15 / 41<br />
Resistivity regimes
Metals: AC Conductivity<br />
16 / 41
Metals: AC Conductivity<br />
All metals show a “Drude peak” in their AC conductivity<br />
16 / 41
Metals: AC Conductivity<br />
All metals show a “Drude peak” in their AC conductivity<br />
ΣΩ<br />
Σ 0<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
2 4 6 8 10<br />
Τ Ω<br />
(Schem<strong>at</strong>ic)<br />
16 / 41
Metals: AC Conductivity<br />
All metals show a “Drude peak” in their AC conductivity<br />
ΣΩ<br />
Σ 0<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
2 4 6 8 10<br />
Τ Ω<br />
(Schem<strong>at</strong>ic)<br />
σ 0 is the DC conductivity, τ is “some” time scale<br />
16 / 41
Metals: There’s More!<br />
Widemann-Franz Law<br />
17 / 41
Metals: There’s More!<br />
Widemann-Franz Law – R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> thermal conductivity and DC<br />
electrical conductivity is proportional to temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
9.7 The Wiede<br />
Table 9.1. Experimentally L =<br />
κ derived values <strong>of</strong> the Lorentz<br />
σ 0 T<br />
number <strong>at</strong> 0°C, L =k E /rT, deduced from published<br />
L is INDEPENDENT d<strong>at</strong>a for electrical <strong>of</strong> the metal!! and thermal conductivity<br />
Metal L(10 ±8 WX/K 2 )<br />
Na 2.10<br />
Ag 2.31<br />
Au 2.35<br />
Cu 2.23<br />
Pb 2.47<br />
Pt 2.51<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
17 / 41
Metals: There’s More!<br />
Widemann-Franz Law – R<strong>at</strong>io <strong>of</strong> thermal conductivity and DC<br />
electrical conductivity is proportional to temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
9.7 The Wiede<br />
Table 9.1. Experimentally L =<br />
κ derived values <strong>of</strong> the Lorentz<br />
σ 0 T<br />
number <strong>at</strong> 0°C, L =k E /rT, deduced from published<br />
L is INDEPENDENT d<strong>at</strong>a for electrical <strong>of</strong> the metal!! and thermal conductivity<br />
Metal L(10 ±8 WX/K 2 )<br />
Na 2.10<br />
Ag 2.31<br />
Au 2.35<br />
Cu 2.23<br />
Pb 2.47<br />
Pt 2.51<br />
...getting intriguing!<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
17 / 41
Metals: There’s EVEN More!<br />
Universal resistivity!<br />
9.6 Thermoelectric Effects<br />
Fig. 9.8. The universal cur<br />
the reduced resistance (R/<br />
a function <strong>of</strong> reduced te<br />
plotted for a number <strong>of</strong> di<br />
ture (T/H, where H is the<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure). D<strong>at</strong>a poin<br />
metals<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
9.6 Thermoelectric E€ects<br />
18 / 41
Metals: There’s EVEN More!<br />
Universal resistivity!<br />
9.6 Thermoelectric Effects<br />
Why?<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
9.6 Thermoelectric E€ects<br />
Fig. 9.8. The universal cur<br />
the reduced resistance (R/<br />
a function <strong>of</strong> reduced te<br />
plotted for a number <strong>of</strong> di<br />
ture (T/H, where H is the<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure). D<strong>at</strong>a poin<br />
metals<br />
18 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal?<br />
A st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter with “Universal” properties in<br />
19 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal?<br />
A st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter with “Universal” properties in<br />
Thermodynamics<br />
19 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal?<br />
A st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter with “Universal” properties in<br />
Thermodynamics<br />
Magnetism<br />
19 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal?<br />
A st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter with “Universal” properties in<br />
Thermodynamics<br />
Magnetism<br />
Transport<br />
19 / 41
Wh<strong>at</strong> is a Metal?<br />
A st<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> m<strong>at</strong>ter with “Universal” properties in<br />
Thermodynamics<br />
Magnetism<br />
Transport<br />
Wh<strong>at</strong> is the simplest theory th<strong>at</strong> describes this?<br />
19 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
Back to st<strong>at</strong>-mech notes<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
Back to st<strong>at</strong>-mech notes<br />
Notes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
Back to st<strong>at</strong>-mech notes<br />
Notes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
A gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting electrons and a gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting<br />
phonons which mutually interact provides the simplest picture <strong>of</strong><br />
metals!<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
Back to st<strong>at</strong>-mech notes<br />
Notes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
A gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting electrons and a gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting<br />
phonons which mutually interact provides the simplest picture <strong>of</strong><br />
metals!<br />
Question: Wh<strong>at</strong> about Coulomb interaction?<br />
20 / 41
Metals<br />
Notes on simple model <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Notes on s<strong>at</strong>-mech <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
Magnetism <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
This gets the T <strong>of</strong> the specific he<strong>at</strong>...but it is really T + T 3 !<br />
...<br />
We need to include phonons<br />
Back to st<strong>at</strong>-mech notes<br />
Notes <strong>of</strong> transport <strong>of</strong> metals<br />
...<br />
A gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting electrons and a gas <strong>of</strong> non interacting<br />
phonons which mutually interact provides the simplest picture <strong>of</strong><br />
metals!<br />
Question: Wh<strong>at</strong> about Coulomb interaction?<br />
Question: Are there phenomenon th<strong>at</strong> this model cannot explain?<br />
20 / 41
On to <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
21 / 41
On to <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
21 / 41
On to <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
21 / 41
On to <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
Discovered (1911) th<strong>at</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> mercury drops to “zero”<br />
below 4.2K!<br />
21 / 41
On to <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Kamerlingh Onnes @ Leiden was obsessed with low temper<strong>at</strong>ures...he<br />
liquified helium!<br />
(Wikipedia)<br />
Discovered (1911) th<strong>at</strong> the resistance <strong>of</strong> mercury drops to “zero”<br />
below 4.2K!<br />
Aptly called superconductivity<br />
21 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
22 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
22 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> “everywhere”<br />
Most elemental metals yield to the charms <strong>of</strong> superconductivity...<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
...perhaps under duress!<br />
22 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> Period Table<br />
Periodic Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Some elements have to be pressurised!<br />
(dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to the memory <strong>of</strong> Bernd M<strong>at</strong>thias)<br />
30 elements superconduct <strong>at</strong> ambient pressure, 23 more superconduct <strong>at</strong> high pressure.<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
23 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> Period Table<br />
Periodic Table <strong>of</strong> <strong>Superconductivity</strong><br />
Some elements have to be pressurised!<br />
(dedic<strong>at</strong>ed to the memory <strong>of</strong> Bernd M<strong>at</strong>thias)<br />
30 elements superconduct <strong>at</strong> ambient pressure, 23 more superconduct <strong>at</strong> high pressure.<br />
(From somewhere on the web!)<br />
23 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
24 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
24 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
Key observ<strong>at</strong>ion: Almost all metallic elements and alloys become<br />
superconducting<br />
24 / 41
Fig. 1.<strong>3.</strong> Histor<br />
first 70 years f<br />
tivity in 1911.<br />
interest in the<br />
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> in Metals and Alloys<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the “best” conventional superconductors are<br />
alloys/intermetallics<br />
Fig. 1.2<br />
(blue)<br />
superc<br />
tion m<br />
Other<br />
marke<br />
tempe<br />
(Benemmann and Ketterson)<br />
Key observ<strong>at</strong>ion: Almost all metallic elements and alloys become<br />
superconducting<br />
Str<strong>at</strong>egy: Explore other properties and describe the st<strong>at</strong>e using the<br />
24 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...superconductors h<strong>at</strong>es electromagnetic fields!!<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...superconductors h<strong>at</strong>es electromagnetic fields!!<br />
The magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H = −1 for a superconductor –<br />
perfect diamagnet<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...superconductors h<strong>at</strong>es electromagnetic fields!!<br />
The magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H = −1 for a superconductor –<br />
perfect diamagnet<br />
...<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...superconductors h<strong>at</strong>es electromagnetic fields!!<br />
The magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H = −1 for a superconductor –<br />
perfect diamagnet<br />
...<br />
This leads to spectacular effects...<br />
25 / 41
Meissner Effect<br />
Superconductor does not like to have an electric field inside it (just<br />
like a normal metal)...<br />
Meissner-Ochsenfeld found th<strong>at</strong> a superconductor also expels all<br />
magnetic field...superconductors h<strong>at</strong>es electromagnetic fields!!<br />
The magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H = −1 for a superconductor –<br />
perfect diamagnet<br />
...<br />
This leads to spectacular effects...and technological applic<strong>at</strong>ions!<br />
25 / 41
Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion Depth<br />
The magnetic field can penetr<strong>at</strong>e into the superconductor near the<br />
surfaces...but dies exponentially as we move into the bulk<br />
26 / 41
Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion Depth<br />
The magnetic field can penetr<strong>at</strong>e into the superconductor near the<br />
surfaces...but dies exponentially as we move into the bulk<br />
There is a length scale associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this decay...called the<br />
penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth<br />
26 / 41
Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion Depth<br />
The magnetic field can penetr<strong>at</strong>e into the superconductor near the<br />
surfaces...but dies exponentially as we move into the bulk<br />
There is a length scale associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this decay...called the<br />
penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth<br />
Most interestingly, the penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth is a function temper<strong>at</strong>ure...<br />
26 / 41
Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion Depth<br />
The magnetic field can penetr<strong>at</strong>e into the superconductor near the<br />
surfaces...but dies exponentially as we move into the bulk<br />
There is a length scale associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this decay...called the<br />
penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth<br />
Most interestingly, the penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth is a function temper<strong>at</strong>ure...<br />
26 / 41
Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion Depth<br />
The magnetic field can penetr<strong>at</strong>e into the superconductor near the<br />
surfaces...but dies exponentially as we move into the bulk<br />
There is a length scale associ<strong>at</strong>ed with this decay...called the<br />
penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth<br />
Most interestingly, the penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth is a function temper<strong>at</strong>ure...<br />
...and diverges <strong>at</strong> T c !<br />
26 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
27 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
Superconductors do not remain perfect diamagmet for all magnetic<br />
fields...there are two types <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
27 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
Superconductors do not remain perfect diamagmet for all magnetic<br />
fields...there are two types <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
Type I: At a critical magnetic field (H c ) superconductivity is lost and<br />
normal st<strong>at</strong>e is restored...typically found in elemental metals<br />
27 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
Superconductors do not remain perfect diamagmet for all magnetic<br />
fields...there are two types <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
Type I: At a critical magnetic field (H c ) superconductivity is lost and<br />
normal st<strong>at</strong>e is restored...typically found in elemental metals<br />
M<br />
M c<br />
0.2<br />
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0<br />
H<br />
H c<br />
0.4<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
1.0<br />
Type I<br />
27 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
Superconductors do not remain perfect diamagmet for all magnetic<br />
fields...there are two types <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
Type I: At a critical magnetic field (H c ) superconductivity is lost and<br />
normal st<strong>at</strong>e is restored...typically found in elemental metals<br />
M<br />
M c<br />
0.2<br />
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0<br />
H<br />
H c<br />
M<br />
M c<br />
0.2<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
H<br />
H c<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
0.6<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
0.8<br />
1.0<br />
Type I<br />
1.0<br />
Type II<br />
27 / 41
Type I and Type II superconductors<br />
Superconductors do not remain perfect diamagmet for all magnetic<br />
fields...there are two types <strong>of</strong> behaviour<br />
Type I: At a critical magnetic field (H c ) superconductivity is lost and<br />
normal st<strong>at</strong>e is restored...typically found in elemental metals<br />
M<br />
M c<br />
0.2<br />
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0<br />
H<br />
H c<br />
M<br />
M c<br />
0.2<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
H<br />
H c<br />
0.4<br />
0.4<br />
0.6<br />
0.6<br />
0.8<br />
0.8<br />
1.0<br />
Type I<br />
Type II<br />
Type II: There are two characteristic magnetic fields (H c1 and<br />
H c2 < H c1 )...<strong>at</strong> H c1 the magnetic field begins to penetr<strong>at</strong>e the<br />
superconductor (not a perfect diagmagnet) and <strong>at</strong> H c2 normal st<strong>at</strong>e<br />
is restored<br />
H c (Type I) and H c1 ,H c2 are functions <strong>of</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure!<br />
1.0<br />
27 / 41
Phase Diagram<br />
28 / 41
Phase Diagram<br />
Type I<br />
28 / 41
Phase Diagram<br />
Type I<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
28 / 41
Phase Diagram<br />
Type I<br />
Type II<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
28 / 41
Phase Diagram<br />
Type I<br />
Type II<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
28 / 41
Thermodynamic Properties<br />
Electronic specific he<strong>at</strong> goes to zero exponentially<br />
29 / 41
Thermodynamic Properties<br />
Electronic 294 specific 10 <strong>Superconductivity</strong> he<strong>at</strong> goes to zero exponentially<br />
part (c ne *T (Ibach forand a normal Lüth) conductor) must be replaced by a component<br />
which, well below the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure, decreases exponentially<br />
c se exp… A= T† : …10:3†<br />
k<br />
Fig. 10.<strong>3.</strong> Specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> normally conducting<br />
(c n ) and superconducting (c s )<br />
aluminium. Below the transition temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
T c , the normally conducting<br />
phase is cre<strong>at</strong>ed by applying a weak<br />
magnetic field <strong>of</strong> 300 G. (After [10.3])<br />
Afurther distinctive property <strong>of</strong> a superconductor is its magnetic behavior.<br />
29 / 41
Thermodynamic Properties<br />
Electronic 294 specific 10 <strong>Superconductivity</strong> he<strong>at</strong> goes to zero exponentially<br />
Fig. 10.<strong>3.</strong> Specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> normally conducting<br />
(c n ) and superconducting (c s )<br />
aluminium. Below the transition temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
T c , the normally conducting<br />
phase is cre<strong>at</strong>ed by applying a weak<br />
magnetic field <strong>of</strong> 300 G. (After [10.3])<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
part (c ne *T (Ibach forand a normal Lüth) conductor) must be replaced by a component<br />
which, well below the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure, decreases exponentially<br />
c se exp… A= T† : …10:3†<br />
k<br />
Afurther distinctive property <strong>of</strong> a superconductor is its magnetic behavior.<br />
29 / 41
Thermodynamic Properties<br />
Electronic 294 specific 10 <strong>Superconductivity</strong> he<strong>at</strong> goes to zero exponentially<br />
Fig. 10.<strong>3.</strong> Specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> normally conducting<br />
(c n ) and superconducting (c s )<br />
aluminium. Below the transition temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
T c , the normally conducting<br />
phase is cre<strong>at</strong>ed by applying a weak<br />
magnetic field <strong>of</strong> 300 G. (After [10.3])<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
part (c ne *T (Ibach forand a normal Lüth) conductor) must be replaced by a component<br />
which, well below the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure, decreases exponentially<br />
c se exp… A= T† : …10:3†<br />
Jump in the specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong> T c – Phase Transition??<br />
k<br />
Afurther distinctive property <strong>of</strong> a superconductor is its magnetic behavior.<br />
29 / 41
Thermodynamic Properties<br />
Electronic 294 specific 10 <strong>Superconductivity</strong> he<strong>at</strong> goes to zero exponentially<br />
Fig. 10.<strong>3.</strong> Specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> normally conducting<br />
(c n ) and superconducting (c s )<br />
aluminium. Below the transition temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />
T c , the normally conducting<br />
phase is cre<strong>at</strong>ed by applying a weak<br />
magnetic field <strong>of</strong> 300 G. (After [10.3])<br />
(Ramakrishnan and Rao)<br />
part (c ne *T (Ibach forand a normal Lüth) conductor) must be replaced by a component<br />
which, well below the critical temper<strong>at</strong>ure, decreases exponentially<br />
c se exp… A= T† : …10:3†<br />
Jump in the specific he<strong>at</strong> <strong>at</strong> T c – Phase Transition??<br />
k<br />
Afurther distinctive property <strong>of</strong> a superconductor is its magnetic behavior.<br />
29 / 41
Thermal Conductivity<br />
30 / 41
Thermal Conductivity<br />
Thermal conductivity also falls with temper<strong>at</strong>ure (approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />
exponentially)<br />
30 / 41
Thermal Conductivity<br />
Thermal conductivity also falls with temper<strong>at</strong>ure (approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />
exponentially)<br />
else Cs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
? ? ? ? ? >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T<br />
X f4iz<br />
C) 0<br />
tC~<br />
0 1 =0C<br />
7t X ,0 arC<br />
g o4o o<br />
o o c o<br />
iw<br />
3<br />
/0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c<br />
0 Ct V<br />
C)4<br />
,X, o :) eD0<br />
0~~~~~~~~4<br />
546 P. M. Rowell<br />
30 / 41
Thermal Conductivity<br />
Thermal conductivity also falls with temper<strong>at</strong>ure (approxim<strong>at</strong>ely<br />
exponentially)<br />
else Cs ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
? ? ? ? ? >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T<br />
X f4iz<br />
C) 0<br />
tC~<br />
0 1 =0C<br />
7t X ,0 arC<br />
g o4o o<br />
o o c o<br />
iw<br />
3<br />
Superconductors are poor thermal conductors!!...Widemann-Franz<br />
goes for a six!!<br />
/0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c<br />
0 Ct V<br />
C)4<br />
,X, o :) eD0<br />
0~~~~~~~~4<br />
546 P. M. Rowell<br />
30 / 41
Optical Properties<br />
31 / 41
Optical Properties<br />
Doesn’t look like a metal...<br />
31 / 41
Optical Properties<br />
Doesn’t look like a metal...<br />
E k ˆ…n 2 k ‡ D2 † 1=2 (10.58) obeys Fermi st<strong>at</strong>istics with the Fermi dis<br />
f (E k ,T) (Sect. 6.3). In the equ<strong>at</strong>ion determining D (10.61) this fact<br />
into account by including the non-occup<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the correspond<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. In place <strong>of</strong> (10.61) one thus has<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 10.15. Infrared<br />
<strong>of</strong> various m<strong>at</strong>eria<br />
mined from the inte<br />
multiply reflected<br />
radi<strong>at</strong>ion. The inte<br />
and I N refer respecti<br />
superconducting an<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>at</strong>e<br />
curves thus represent<br />
ence between the in<br />
flectivity <strong>of</strong> the sup<br />
ing and normally c<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. (After [10.11])<br />
31 / 41
Optical Properties<br />
Doesn’t look like a metal...<br />
E k ˆ…n 2 k ‡ D2 † 1=2 (10.58) obeys Fermi st<strong>at</strong>istics with the Fermi dis<br />
f (E k ,T) (Sect. 6.3). In the equ<strong>at</strong>ion determining D (10.61) this fact<br />
into account by including the non-occup<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the correspond<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. In place <strong>of</strong> (10.61) one thus has<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
...looks more like a semiconductor! Has a GAP!!<br />
Fig. 10.15. Infrared<br />
<strong>of</strong> various m<strong>at</strong>eria<br />
mined from the inte<br />
multiply reflected<br />
radi<strong>at</strong>ion. The inte<br />
and I N refer respecti<br />
superconducting an<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>at</strong>e<br />
curves thus represent<br />
ence between the in<br />
flectivity <strong>of</strong> the sup<br />
ing and normally c<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. (After [10.11])<br />
31 / 41
Optical Properties<br />
Doesn’t look like a metal...<br />
E k ˆ…n 2 k ‡ D2 † 1=2 (10.58) obeys Fermi st<strong>at</strong>istics with the Fermi dis<br />
f (E k ,T) (Sect. 6.3). In the equ<strong>at</strong>ion determining D (10.61) this fact<br />
into account by including the non-occup<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the correspond<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. In place <strong>of</strong> (10.61) one thus has<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
...looks more like a semiconductor! Has a GAP!!<br />
Superconductor HAS A GAP!!!!<br />
Fig. 10.15. Infrared<br />
<strong>of</strong> various m<strong>at</strong>eria<br />
mined from the inte<br />
multiply reflected<br />
radi<strong>at</strong>ion. The inte<br />
and I N refer respecti<br />
superconducting an<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>at</strong>e<br />
curves thus represent<br />
ence between the in<br />
flectivity <strong>of</strong> the sup<br />
ing and normally c<br />
st<strong>at</strong>es. (After [10.11])<br />
31 / 41
0 F<br />
Temper<strong>at</strong>ure Dependence <strong>of</strong> Gap<br />
Gap is temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependent<br />
0<br />
2 T c<br />
Anumerical tre<strong>at</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> the integral (10.78) yields<br />
1 ˆ V 0 Z…E 0 F † ln 1:14hx D<br />
or …10:79 a<br />
T c<br />
kT c ˆ 1:14hx D e 1=V0Z…E0 F † :<br />
k<br />
k<br />
…10:79 b<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 10.16. Temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence <strong>of</strong> the gap energy D(T) rel<strong>at</strong>ive to the value D(0)<br />
T=0 for In, Sn and Pb. Values determined from tunnel experiments (Panel IX) are com<br />
pared with those predicted by BCS theory (dashed). (After [10.12])<br />
32 / 41
0 F<br />
Temper<strong>at</strong>ure Dependence <strong>of</strong> Gap<br />
Gap is temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependent<br />
0<br />
2 T c<br />
Anumerical tre<strong>at</strong>ment <strong>of</strong> the integral (10.78) yields<br />
1 ˆ V 0 Z…E 0 F † ln 1:14hx D<br />
or …10:79 a<br />
T c<br />
kT c ˆ 1:14hx D e 1=V0Z…E0 F † :<br />
k<br />
k<br />
…10:79 b<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
Fig. 10.16. Temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependence <strong>of</strong> the gap energy D(T) rel<strong>at</strong>ive to the value D(0)<br />
T=0 for In, Sn and Pb. Values determined from tunnel experiments (Panel IX) are com<br />
pared with those predicted by BCS theory (dashed). (After [10.12])<br />
Gap vanishes <strong>at</strong> T c<br />
32 / 41
Critical Current<br />
A superconductor cannot support an arbitrary large current<br />
density...there is a critical current density j c<br />
33 / 41
Critical Current<br />
A superconductor cannot support an arbitrary large current<br />
density...there is a critical current density j c<br />
The critical current is temper<strong>at</strong>ure dependent<br />
33 / 41
MAGNETIC<br />
J c T versus T curve (g–h–i–a) drawn for<br />
Critical Current B app = 0, which also appears in Figs. 2.43<br />
in the previous section and 2.47. Figure 2.46 shows three B c T<br />
l magnetic A superconductor field has the cannot<br />
versus T<br />
support<br />
curves projected<br />
an arbitrary<br />
onto<br />
large<br />
the J tr<br />
current<br />
= 0<br />
dence on<br />
density...there<br />
temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>given</strong> plane, while Fig. 2.47 presents three J<br />
is a critical current density j c T<br />
c<br />
d this is plotted in Fig. 2.41. versus T curves projected onto the B app = 0<br />
e curve near The Tcritical c is <strong>given</strong> current by plane. is temper<strong>at</strong>ure Finally, Fig. dependent 2.48 gives projections <strong>of</strong><br />
ay also Phase be written diagram in H-T -I plane<br />
2B c 0<br />
=− (2.71)<br />
T c<br />
I superconductors this r<strong>at</strong>io<br />
−15 and −50 mT/K; for<br />
a value <strong>of</strong> −223mT/K<br />
uperconductor has two criter-critical<br />
field B c1 and an<br />
ld B c2 , where B c1
Flux Quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
34 / 41
Flux Quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
The flux through a superconducting ring seems to be quantized<br />
34 / 41
Flux Quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
The flux through a superconducting ring seems to be quantized<br />
(Daever and Fairbank, 1961)<br />
34 / 41
Flux Quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
The flux through a superconducting ring seems to be quantized<br />
(Daever and Fairbank, 1961)<br />
Some sort <strong>of</strong> “macroscopic quantum phenomenon”<br />
34 / 41
Isotope Effect<br />
35 / 41
Isotope Effect<br />
The strangest thing...the T c depends on the isotope!!<br />
35 / 41
Fig. 10.17. Isotope eff<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> sever<br />
summarized [10.13]:<br />
Lock, Pippard, Shoen<br />
Reynolds and Lohman<br />
Isotope Effect<br />
The strangest thing...the T c depends on the isotope!!<br />
10.7 Supercurrents and Critical Cur<br />
(Ibach and Lüth)<br />
10.7 Supercurrents and Critical Currents<br />
The main goal <strong>of</strong> a theory <strong>of</strong> superconductivity is <strong>of</strong> course to ex<br />
fundamental properties <strong>of</strong> the superconducting phase: the<br />
35 / 41<br />
disa
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Critical current<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Critical current<br />
Flux quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Critical current<br />
Flux quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Isotope effect<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Critical current<br />
Flux quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Isotope effect<br />
...<br />
36 / 41
<strong>Superconductivity</strong> – Summary <strong>of</strong> Observ<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Zero resistance<br />
Meissner effect (Penetr<strong>at</strong>ion depth)<br />
Type I and II superconductors<br />
Vanishing specific he<strong>at</strong><br />
Poor thermal conductivity<br />
Gap in excit<strong>at</strong>ions<br />
Critical current<br />
Flux quantiz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
Isotope effect<br />
...<br />
This is wh<strong>at</strong> we need to explain!<br />
36 / 41
Development <strong>of</strong> a Theory<br />
37 / 41
Development <strong>of</strong> a Theory<br />
Phenomenological Approach<br />
37 / 41
Development <strong>of</strong> a Theory<br />
Phenomenological Approach<br />
Microscopic Approach<br />
37 / 41
Superconductor = Perfect Conductor?<br />
38 / 41
Superconductor = Perfect Conductor?<br />
38 / 41
Superconductor = Perfect Conductor?<br />
Given th<strong>at</strong> the superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance, let us<br />
consider a perfect conductor and do the following thought experiment<br />
38 / 41
Superconductor = Perfect Conductor?<br />
Given th<strong>at</strong> the superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance, let us<br />
10.1 Some Fundamental Phenomena Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>Superconductivity</strong> 295<br />
consider a perfect conductor and do the following thought experiment<br />
Fig. 10.4. Magnetic behavior <strong>of</strong> an ideal conductor (A) and a superconductor (B): (A) Inan<br />
ideal conductor, the final (Ibach st<strong>at</strong>e (d) and or(g) depends Lüth) on whether the sample is first cooled to<br />
below T c before applying the magnetic field B ext, or altern<strong>at</strong>ively, cooled in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
the field. (a ? b) The sample loses its resistance when cooled in a field-free region. (c) Applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<strong>of</strong> B ext to sample with zero resistance. (d) MagneticfieldB ext switched <strong>of</strong>f. (e?f )<br />
Sample loses its resistance in the magnetic field. (g) MagneticfieldB ext switched <strong>of</strong>f. (B)<br />
For a superconductor, the final st<strong>at</strong>es (d) and(g) are identical, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether B ext is<br />
switched on before or after cooling the sample: (a?b) sample loses its resistance upon<br />
cooling in the absence <strong>of</strong> a magnetic field. (c) Applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the field Bext to the supercon-<br />
38 / 41
Superconductor = Perfect Conductor?<br />
Given th<strong>at</strong> the superconducting st<strong>at</strong>e has zero resistance, let us<br />
10.1 Some Fundamental Phenomena Associ<strong>at</strong>ed with <strong>Superconductivity</strong> 295<br />
consider a perfect conductor and do the following thought experiment<br />
Fig. 10.4. Magnetic behavior <strong>of</strong> an ideal conductor (A) and a superconductor (B): (A) Inan<br />
ideal conductor, the final (Ibach st<strong>at</strong>e (d) and or(g) depends Lüth) on whether the sample is first cooled to<br />
below T c before applying the magnetic field B ext, or altern<strong>at</strong>ively, cooled in the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
the field. (a ? b) The sample loses its resistance when cooled in a field-free region. (c) Applic<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
<strong>of</strong> B ext to sample with zero resistance. (d) MagneticfieldB ext switched <strong>of</strong>f. (e?f )<br />
Sample loses its resistance in the magnetic field. (g) MagneticfieldB ext switched <strong>of</strong>f. (B)<br />
For a superconductor, the final st<strong>at</strong>es (d) and(g) are identical, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether B ext is<br />
switched on before or after cooling the sample: (a?b) sample loses its resistance upon<br />
cooling in the absence <strong>of</strong> a magnetic field. (c) Applic<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> the field Bext to the supercon-<br />
Superconductor and perfect conductor are very different! “Perfect<br />
conductor” does not lead to a consistent thermodynamic st<strong>at</strong>e!<br />
38 / 41
39 / 41
40 / 41
41 / 41