Annual Report 2011 - PGS
Annual Report 2011 - PGS
Annual Report 2011 - PGS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Notes to the consolidated financial statements<br />
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
Note 10 - Income Taxes<br />
The net income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consists of the following:<br />
Years ended December 31,<br />
(In thousands of dollars) <strong>2011</strong> 2010 2009<br />
Current taxes 1,238 18,868 50,066<br />
Deferred taxes 28,806 (4,965) 1,876<br />
Total income tax expense (benefit) 30,044 13,903 51,942<br />
The net income tax expense (benefit) from discontinuing operations consists of the following:<br />
Years ended December 31,<br />
(In thousands of dollars) <strong>2011</strong> 2010 2009<br />
Current taxes --- 6,677 (108)<br />
Deferred taxes (307) (5,360) 6,221<br />
Total income tax expense (benefit) (307) 1,317 6,113<br />
The deferred tax liability (asset), recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, is as follows:<br />
Years ended December 31,<br />
(In thousands of dollars) <strong>2011</strong> 2010<br />
Interest rate hedging (Note 26) (7,150) (7,873)<br />
The income tax expense differs from the amounts computed when applying the Norwegian statutory tax rate to income (loss)<br />
before income taxes as a result of the following:<br />
Years ended December 31,<br />
(In thousands of dollars) <strong>2011</strong> 2010 2009<br />
Income before income tax expense from continuing operations 64,513 (8,598) 216,522<br />
Norwegian statutory rate 28% 28% 28%<br />
Provision for income taxes at statutory rate 18,064 (2,407) 60,626<br />
Increase (reduction) in income taxes from:<br />
Effects of tax rates other than statutory tax rate in Norway (1,177) (2,865) (5,323)<br />
Tax exempt income inside tonnage tax regimes 1,101 (5,631) (49,999)<br />
Effects on tax expense from tonnage tax regime entry/exit old tonnage tax<br />
--- 986 (31,617)<br />
regime dispute<br />
Impairment Arrow vessels which are non-deductible --- 23,107 45,186<br />
Change in assessment on recoverability of prepaid income tax in Brazil (7,889) (12,332) 21,000<br />
Foreign taxes not deductible or subject to credit 4,293 5,857 7,775<br />
Currency effects (a) 971 2,622 2,261<br />
Change in tax contingencies recognized as tax expense (benefit) (5,352) 1,926 (7,311)<br />
Change in unrecognized deferred tax assets including current year losses<br />
where no benefit was provided 7,085 2,805 18,955<br />
Prior period adjustments 7,444 (2,678) (7,446)<br />
Other permanent items 5,504 2,513 (2,165)<br />
Income tax expense 30,044 13,903 51,942<br />
(a) Relates to changes in tax positions in local currency for US Dollar functional currency companies.<br />
Comments on selected line items in the preceding table:<br />
Norway – exit old tonnage tax regime – tax dispute<br />
Until 2002, <strong>PGS</strong> Shipping AS and <strong>PGS</strong> Shipping (Isle of Man) Ltd. were taxed under the Norwegian tonnage tax regime.<br />
In 2003 it was decided to exit with effect from January 1, 2002. The issue with the Norwegian Central Tax Office for Large<br />
Enterprises (“CTO”) was related to the assessment of the fair value of the shares in <strong>PGS</strong> Shipping (IoM) Ltd. upon exit in 2002.<br />
In 2010, the dispute was settled, increasing deferred tax expense by approximately $1.0 million.<br />
Impairment Arrow vessels<br />
The net impairments relating to the Arrow vessels (see Note 18), which are under the UK tonnage tax regime, are nondeductible<br />
and have as such not benefited the reported income tax expense.<br />
Prepaid income tax in Brazil<br />
In 2009, the Company introduced a valuation allowance relating to prepaid income tax expense in Brazil, amounting to<br />
$21.0 million, due to uncertainty of future utilization of these prepaid taxes. In <strong>2011</strong> and 2010, the Company re-assessed the<br />
recoverability of $7.9 million and $12.3 million, respectively, of the prepaid income tax, since it was more likely than not that the<br />
amount will be utilized.<br />
17 <strong>PGS</strong> ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2011</strong><br />
88 <strong>PGS</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2011</strong>