POLJOPRIVREDA - Poljoprivredni fakultet u Osijeku
POLJOPRIVREDA - Poljoprivredni fakultet u Osijeku
POLJOPRIVREDA - Poljoprivredni fakultet u Osijeku
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UDK 63 ISSN 1330-7142<br />
<strong>POLJOPRIVREDA</strong><br />
znanstveno - stru~ni ~asopis<br />
Svezak 9; Broj 1; Lipanj, 2003.<br />
SADR@AJ<br />
Z. Zduni}, D. [imi}, I. Brki}, A. Jambrovi}, Renata Zduni}, Tatjana Leden~an<br />
PROCJENA GENETSKIH EFEKATA ZA VISINU BILJKE NA DVA SPECIFI^NA PARA INBRED<br />
LINIJA KUKURUZA I [EST GENERACIJA KRI@ANJA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
Manda Antunovi}, V. Kova~evi}, Mirta Rastija, Z. Zduni}<br />
UTJECAJ TLA I GENOTIPA NA SADR@AJ MIKROELEMENATA U KUKURUZU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
V. Kova~evi}, I. Brki}<br />
UTJECAJ KALIJEVA KLORIDA NA PRINOS I STANJE ISHRANE U DVA HIBRIDA KUKURUZA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15<br />
B. [imi}, V. Kova~evi}, Zorica Jurkovi}<br />
REAKCIJA GENOTIPOVA KUKURUZA NA GNOJIDBU NA HIDROMORFNOM TLU POSAVINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20<br />
Mira Kne`evi}, Marija \urki}, I. Kne`evi}, K. Hajba<br />
UTJECAJ OBRADE TLA I NISKIH HERBICIDNIH DOZA NA KOROVNU POPULACIJU I PRINOS JAROG JE^MA . . . 25<br />
A. Kristek, Zvjezdana Magud, Manda Antunovi}, Suzana Kristek<br />
PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA [E]ERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD<br />
OSJETLJIVOSTI NA CERKOSPORU (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31<br />
T. ^upi}, S. Popovi}, Marijana Tucak, M. Stjepanovi}, Sonja Grlju{i}<br />
PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRA[KA (Pisum sativum L.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />
T. Karadeniz, A. Kazankaya, T. Yarilgaç<br />
ODRE\IVANJE POMOLO[KIH ZNA^AJKI BADEMA (Prunus amygdalus Batsh) U MALATYI (TURSKA) . . . . . . . . 42<br />
M.Yercan, S. Engindeniz<br />
PROFITABILNOST PROIZVODNJE SUHIH SMOKAVA (PRIMJER U TURSKOJ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46<br />
P. Miji}, I. Kne`evi}<br />
NOVI NA^IN VREDNOVANJA KRAVLJEG MLIJEKA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52<br />
\. Sen~i}, Marcela [peranda, Z. Antunovi}, T. [peranda<br />
TOVNOST I MESNATOST SVINJA NEKIH DVOPASMINSKIH KRI@ANACA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56<br />
T. Rastija, Z. Antunovi}, Mirjana Baban, I. Mandi}<br />
RAZVIJENOST I KORELACIJSKA POVEZANOST SEDMODNEVNE I [ESTOMJESE^NE LIPICANSKE @DREBADI . . 60<br />
1 OSIJEK<br />
2003.<br />
Sv. 9
Glavni i odgovorni urednik<br />
Editor-in-Chief<br />
Dra`enka Jurkovi}<br />
Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Ure|iva~ki odbor<br />
Editorial Board<br />
Franc Habe, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical<br />
Faculty, Dom`ale, Slovenia<br />
Viktor Jej~i}, Agricultural Institute, Ljubljana,<br />
Slovenia<br />
Geza Kuroli, University of West Hungary Faculty of<br />
Agricultural and Food Sciences, Mosonmagyarovar,<br />
Hungary<br />
Istvan Rajcan, University of Guelph, Ontario,<br />
Canada<br />
Zdenko Rengel, University of Western Australia<br />
Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences,<br />
Crawley, Australia<br />
Jon Tollefson, Iowa State University, Ames, USA<br />
Ivan Brki}, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek, Hrvatska<br />
Marija Ivezi}, Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja<br />
Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Sonja Jovanovac, Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja<br />
Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Zorica Jurkovi}, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek<br />
Goran Ku{ec, Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja<br />
Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Alojzije Lali}, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek, Hrvatska<br />
Svetislav Popovi}, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek,<br />
Hrvatska<br />
Tihana Tekli}, Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja<br />
Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Marija Vratari}, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek,<br />
Hrvatska<br />
Mate Vuj~i}, Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja Strossmayera<br />
u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Hrvatska<br />
Tehni~ki urednici<br />
Technical Editors<br />
Manda Antunovi}<br />
Danica Han`ek<br />
Lektura<br />
Language Editing<br />
Branka Horvat<br />
Anica Perkovi}<br />
Prijevodi<br />
Translation<br />
Anica Perkovi}<br />
Tisak<br />
Print<br />
Grafika d.o.o. Osijek
UDK 63 ISSN 1330-7142<br />
<strong>POLJOPRIVREDA</strong><br />
znanstveno - stru~ni ~asopis<br />
Svezak 9; Broj 1; Lipanj, 2003.<br />
Izdava~i<br />
Published by<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong><br />
The Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek<br />
31000 Osijek, Trg Sv.Trojstva 3<br />
Republika Hrvatska / The Republic of Croatia<br />
Tel. ++385 31 224 200<br />
Fax: ++385 31 207 017<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek<br />
Agricultural Institute Osijek<br />
31000 Osijek, Ju`no predgra|e 17<br />
Republika Hrvatska / The Republic of Croatia<br />
Tel. ++385 31 500 685<br />
Fax: ++385 31 503 404<br />
Osijek, 2003.
"<strong>POLJOPRIVREDA</strong> znanstveno-stru~ni ~asopis" je sljedbenik ~asopisa »ZNANOST I PRAKSA U POLJOPRIVREDI<br />
I PREHRAMBENOJ TEHNOLOGIJI«, koji je izlazio od 1975. do 1994. godine / The Journal of «AGRICULTURE<br />
Scientific and Professional Review» is continuator the Journal of «RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN AGRICULTURE AND<br />
FOOD TECHNOLOGY» that has been published from 1975 to 1994 year.<br />
^asopis izlazi dva puta godi{nje u nakladi od 300 primjeraka / The Review is published twice a year in 300 copies.<br />
"<strong>POLJOPRIVREDA</strong> znanstveno-stru~ni ~asopis" citira se u sljede}im bazama podataka / "AGRICULTURE Scientific<br />
and Professional Review" is cited by the database:<br />
1. CAB International<br />
3. Nacionalna i sveu~ili{na hrvatska biblioteka / National and University Croatian Library<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 631.524.5+631.527.5:633.15<br />
PROCJENA GENETSKIH EFEKATA ZA VISINU BILJKE NA DVA<br />
SPECIFI^NA PARA INBRED LINIJA KUKURUZA I [EST<br />
GENERACIJA KRI@ANJA<br />
Z. Zduni} (1) , D. [imi} (1) , I. Brki} (1) , A. Jambrovi} (1) ,<br />
Renata Zduni} (2) , Tatjana Leden~an (1)<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
Procjena genetskih efekata za svojstva od interesa sastavni je dio ve}ine oplemenjiva~kih<br />
programa na Poljoprivrednom institutu Osijek. Ovaj se rad bavi procjenom prihvatljivosti<br />
(adequacy) aditivno/dominantnog modela naslje|ivanja te procjenom i usporedbom<br />
genetskih efekata za visinu biljke na dva odabrana specifi~na para inbred linija<br />
(A672´Va99 i A672´Os6-2) i njihovih {est osnovnih generacija kri`anja (P1, P2, F1, F2,<br />
BCP1 i BCP2). Provedena su dvogodi{nja istra`ivanja na dva lokaliteta u isto~noj<br />
Hrvatskoj. Pokusi su se sastojali od 121 ~lana razli~itog stupnja inbridinga dobivenih<br />
parcijalnim dialelnim kri`anjem, zatim samooplodnjom i povratnim kri`anjem. U obje<br />
godine istra`ivanja kori{ten je nepotpuni blokni (jednostavni latis - lattice) raspored.<br />
Rezultati goodnes of fit testa ukazali su da aditivno/dominantni model nije mogao objasniti<br />
sva variranja me|u srednjim vrijednostima istra`ivanih generacija. Digeni epistatski<br />
model pokazao se prihvatljivim kod oba para barem u jednoj godini istra`ivanja.<br />
Procjene i usporedbe genetskih efekata za izdvojene specifi~ne parove i {est generacija<br />
kri`anja otkrili su prevladavaju}e dominantne u~inke gena u odnosu na aditivne.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: kukuruz, visina biljke, analiza srednjih vrijednosti generacija, genetski efekti<br />
UVOD<br />
U oplemenjivanju sila`nog kukuruza visina biljke<br />
predstavlja va`no kvantitativno svojstvo, ~ija je ekspresija<br />
uvjetovana razli~itim djelovanjem poligena, njihovom<br />
interakcijom s okolinom i okolinskim utjecajem.<br />
Melchinger, Geiger i Schnell (1986.) opisuju kako poznavanje<br />
prirode aktivnosti gena otvara mogu}nost oplemenjiva~ima<br />
kukuruza za bolje optimiziranje oplemenjiva~kih<br />
programa.<br />
Procjena genetskih efekata koji su uklju~eni u kontroliranje<br />
visine biljke mo`e se izvr{iti pomo}u analize<br />
srednjih vrijednosti generacija (generation means analysis),<br />
Hayman (1958.). Budu}i da se ta analiza zasniva<br />
na srednjim vrijednostima svojstva od interesa, a ne<br />
varijancama, njezina osjetljivost i preciznost mogu imati<br />
izvjestan utjecaj na oplemenjiva~ke programe. Za detektiranje<br />
epistati~kih efekata, me|utim, ta analiza predstavlja<br />
bolji test od ispitivanja komponenata varijanci<br />
(Fenster i sur., 1997.). Kumar i Gangashetti (1998.)<br />
utvrdili su kod pet prou~avanih genotipova zna~ajne aditivne<br />
i neaditivne genetske efekte za visinu biljke. Mahto<br />
i Ganguli (2001.) procijenili su zna~ajne i ve}e dominantne<br />
nego aditivne efekte, kao i zna~ajne aditivneaditivne<br />
i dominantnedominantne digenetske epistatske<br />
interakcije. Procjena aditivnihaditivnih i dominantnihdominantnih<br />
interakcija bila je ve}a nego aditivnihdominantnih<br />
interakcija.<br />
Nedostatak genetskih informacija o visini biljke u<br />
doma}oj literaturi bio je dodatni motiv za to istra`ivanje.<br />
Cilj ovog istra`ivanja bio je procijeniti i usporediti genetske<br />
efekte uklju~uju}i i digenetske nealelne interakcije<br />
(epistaze) za visinu biljke kod dva specifi~na para inbred<br />
linija i njihovih {est osnovnih generacija.<br />
(1) Dr.sc. Zvonimir Zduni}, dr.sc. Domagoj [imi}, dr.sc. Ivan Brki}, dr.sc.<br />
Antun Jambrovi} i dr.sc. Tatjana Leden~an – Odjel za oplemenjivanje i<br />
genetiku kukuruza, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek, Ju`no predgra|e 17,<br />
31000 Osijek, (2) Renata Zduni}, dipl. ing., zn. novak – Sveu~ili{te<br />
Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>,<br />
Zavod za za{titu bilja, Trg Svetog Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
6<br />
Z. Zduni} i sur.: PROCJENA GENETSKIH EFEKATA ZA VISINU BILJKE NA DVA SPECIFIÈNA PARA ...<br />
MATERIJAL I METODE<br />
Provedeno je dvogodi{nje istra`ivanje na dva lokaliteta<br />
u isto~noj Hrvatskoj. Kri`anci uklju~eni u<br />
istra`ivanje izabrani su iz seta od ukupno 28 kri`anaca,<br />
stvorenih 88 polovi~nim dialelnim planom kri`anja<br />
(Zduni}, 2001.). Oni predstavljaju najvi{e kori{ten heteroti~ni<br />
koncept BSSS × Lancaster u klasi~nom oplemenjivanju<br />
kukuruza. [est osnovnih generacija kri`anja<br />
(P1, P2, F 1<br />
, F 2<br />
, BCP1 i BCP2) posijane su prema jednostavnom<br />
latis (lattice) planu pokusa. Za sve generacije<br />
i na svakom lokalitetu podaci su uzimani na individualnoj<br />
osnovi (po biljci), s veli~inom uzorka od najmanje<br />
80 biljaka za uniformne generacije i 240 biljaka<br />
za segregiraju}e generacije kri`anja. Da bi se izbjegao<br />
efekt kompeticije redova me|u generacijama s<br />
razli~itim stupnjem inbridinga, podaci nisu uzimani iz<br />
dva rubna reda svake parcelice. Za odabrane kri`ance<br />
provedena je analiza srednjih vrijednosti generacijâ,<br />
koriste}i model koji su detaljno opisali Mather i Jinks<br />
(1982.). Notacija genetskih efekata m, a, d, aa, dd, i ad<br />
preuzeta je od Gamblea (1962.). Prikladnost (adequacy)<br />
additivno/dominantnog modela naslje|ivanja<br />
testirana je 2 testom (goodness of fit test), a<br />
zna~ajnost genetskih parametara t-testom.<br />
REZULTATI I RASPRAVA<br />
Srednje vrijednosti visine biljke sa standardnim<br />
pogre{kama (SE) kroz {est generacija kri`anja za dva<br />
kri`anca i dvije godine istra`ivanja prikazani su u Tablici<br />
1. Roditeljske generacije razlikovale su se u visini biljke<br />
kod oba istra`ivana kri`anca i u obje godine. F 1<br />
generacija<br />
kri`anja je zbog ekspresije heterozisa o~ekivano<br />
ostvarila najvi{e prosjeke kod oba kri`anca u obje godine<br />
istra`ivanja. Promatraju}i segregiraju}e generacije,<br />
F 2<br />
generacija je ostvarila najvi{e prosjeke kod<br />
A672×Va99 kri`anca u obje godine, dok je kod<br />
A672×Os6-2 kri`anca F 2<br />
generacija bila najvi{a u<br />
1998., a BCP2 generacija u 1999. godini istra`ivanja.<br />
Kod procjene prikladnosti odre|enog modela naslje|ivanja,<br />
2 test pokazao se signifikantnim kod oba<br />
kri`anca u najmanje jednoj godini istra`ivanja, {to ukazuje<br />
da glavni efekti nisu mogli u potpunosti objasniti<br />
variranja me|u prosjecima generacija kri`anja (podaci<br />
nisu prikazani). Lamkey et al. (1995.) nagla{avaju da<br />
uvo|enje digenih epistatskih efekata u nekim slu~ajevima<br />
mo`e pobolj{ati fit modela za odre|ena svojstva ~ak<br />
i kada c2 ostaje signifikantan. Prema rezultatima goodnes<br />
of fit testa u ovom istra`ivanju, kod prvog istra`ivanog<br />
kri`anca A672×Va99 aditivno/dominantni model<br />
naslje|ivanja nije uspio objasniti variranja u visini biljke<br />
kod razli~itih generacija kri`anja u 1998. godini.<br />
Me|utim, model se pokazao adekvatnim u 1999. godini.<br />
Nasuprot tomu, kod A672×Os6-2 kri`anca additivno/dominantni<br />
model nije bio zadovoljavaju}i niti u jednoj<br />
godini istra`ivanja.<br />
U 1998. godini rezultati procjene glavnih i interakcijskih<br />
(epistatskih) efekata kod prvog istra`ivanog<br />
kri`anca A672×Va99 ukazuju na pozitivne signifikantne<br />
aditivne efekte, dok su dominantni efekti bili pozitivni i<br />
nesignifikantni (Tablica 2.). Procjenjeni su i negativni<br />
signifikantni dominantnidominantni interakcijski efekti<br />
(epistaze), kao i negativni nesignifikantni additivniadditivni<br />
i additivnidominantni efekti (Tablica 2.). Takvi<br />
rezultati ukazuju da su ovdje interalelne interakcije (epistaze)<br />
odigrale va`nu ulogu u naslje|ivanju visine biljke.<br />
Pozitivne odnosno negativne procjene dominantnih i<br />
aditivno×dominantnih efekata nisu bile zna~ajne. U<br />
1999. godini procijenjeni su pozitivni nesignifikantni aditivni<br />
te signifikantni dominantni efekti (Tablica 3.).<br />
Kod A672×Os6-2 kri`anca u obje godine<br />
istra`ivanja procjenjeni su pozitivni signifikantni aditivni<br />
efekti (Tablice 2 i 3). Procjene additivnih additivnih, kao<br />
i dominantnih ×dominantnih interakcijskih efekata bile<br />
su negativne i signifikantne u 1998. godini (Tablica 2.). U<br />
1999. godini procjenjeni su i pozitivni dominantni efekti,<br />
dok su kod samo dominantni ×dominantni interakcijski<br />
efekti bili zna~ajni i negativni (Tablica 3.). Iz navedenih je<br />
rezultata vidljivo da su kod oba istra`ivana specifi~na<br />
Tablica 1. Srednje vrijednosti i standardne pogre{ke (cm) u 1998. i 1999. godini<br />
Table 1. Means and standard errors for plant height (cm) in 1998 and 1999<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
Z. Zduni} i sur.: PROCJENA GENETSKIH EFEKATA ZA VISINU BILJKE NA DVA SPECIFIÈNA PARA ...<br />
7<br />
Tablica 2. Procjene genetskih efekata i njihove standardne pogre{ke u 1998. godini<br />
Table 2. Estimates of genetic effects with their standard errors for plant height in 1998<br />
ns = nesignifikantno - no significant, ** signifikantno na razini vjerojatnosti 0,01<br />
*, ** t-test significant at P
8<br />
Z. Zduni} i sur.: PROCJENA GENETSKIH EFEKATA ZA VISINU BILJKE NA DVA SPECIFIÈNA PARA ...<br />
7. Lamkey, K.R., Schnicker, B.J., Melchinger, A.E. (1995):<br />
Epistasis in an Elite Maize Hybrid and Choice of<br />
Generation for Inbred Line Development. Crop Sci. 35:<br />
1272-1281.<br />
8. Lübberstedt, T., Melchinger, A.E., Schön, C.C., Utz, H.F.,<br />
Klein, D. (1997): QTL mapping in testcrosses of<br />
European flint lines of maize .1. Comparison of different<br />
testers for forage yield traits Crop Sci. 37(3):921-931.<br />
9. Mahto, R.N., Ganguli, D.K. (2001): Generation means<br />
analysis for grain yield and its components in maize.<br />
Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding,<br />
61(2):165-166.<br />
10. Mather, K., Jinks, J.L. (1982): Biometrical Genetics.<br />
Chapman Hall, London.<br />
11. Melchinger, A.E., Geiger, H.H., Schnell, F.W. (1986):<br />
Epistasis in maize. 2. Genetic effects in crosses among<br />
early flint and dent inbred lines determined by three<br />
methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72: 231-239.<br />
12. Zduni}, Z. (2001.): Optimalna procjena oplemenjiva~ke<br />
vrijednosti linija kukuruza (Zea mays L.). Doktorska<br />
disertacija. Agronomski <strong>fakultet</strong> Sveu~ili{ta u Zagrebu.<br />
ESTIMATION OF GENETIC EFFECTS ON PLANT HEIGHT IN TWO SPECIFIC<br />
PAIRS OF INBRED LINES AND ITS SIX BASIC GENERATIONS<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Estimation of genetic effects on economically important traits is a common procedure in the most breeding programmes<br />
at Agricultural Institute Osijek. This paper deals with estimation of adequacy over additive/dominance<br />
model of inheritance as well as estimation and comparison of genetic effects on plant height for two specific pairs<br />
of inbreds (A672Va99; A672Os6-2), and its six basic generations (P2, F 1<br />
, F 2<br />
, BCP1 and BCP2). Two year investigation<br />
was carried out at two locations in eastern Croatia. The trails consisted of 121 entries of different inbreeding<br />
level derived by partial diallel mating design followed by selfing and back crossing. Simple lattice experimental<br />
design was used in both investigated years. Goodness of fit test results indicated the additive/dominance model failed<br />
to explain all differences among generation means. Digenic epistatic model appeared to be adequate in both<br />
investigated pairs of inbreds at least in one of the investigated years. Estimations and comparisons of genetic effects<br />
for selected pairs of inbreds and basic generations revealed prevailing dominance effects when compared to additive.<br />
Key words: maize, plant height, Generation mean analysis, genetic effects<br />
(Primljeno 9. travnja 2003.; prihva}eno 16. svibnja 2003. - Received on 9 April 2003; accepted on 16 May 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 633.15:631.524.6<br />
INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON<br />
MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS IN MAIZE PLANTS<br />
Manda Antunovi} (1) , V. Kova~evi} (1) , Mirta Rastija (1) , Z. Zduni} (2)<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Ten corn hybrids were grown on two soil types of Drava Valley in Slatina area (alluvial<br />
soil and pseudogley) during two growing seasons (1998 and 1999). The ear-leaf at the<br />
beginning of silking stage was taken for chemical analysis. Micronutrient concentrations<br />
in corn leave samples were measured by ICP-AES after their microwave digestion using<br />
concentrated HNO 3<br />
+H 2<br />
O 2<br />
. Mobile fraction of these elements in soils was also determined<br />
by ICP-AES after their extraction by ammonium acetate-EDTA. In both year of the<br />
testing, corn yields on acid soil were about 25% lower in comparison with alluvial soil.<br />
Mean concentrations of tested elements in corn leaves found in our investigations (mg<br />
kg -1 ) were 30.4 (Zn), 129.4 (Mn) and 190.0 (Fe), respectively. In general, significant<br />
influences of growing season, soil type and genotype on Zn, Mn and Fe status in corn<br />
were found. For example, in the first year of testing higher Zn and Mn were found, as<br />
well as lower Fe concentrations in comparison with the second year. Corn growing on<br />
alluvial soil occurred due to lower Zn and Mn as well as higher Fe concentrations in<br />
plants compared to growing on pseudogley. However, these findings are not in coincidence<br />
with status of mobile fractions of Zn and Mn in the experimental plots. We presume<br />
that pH value near to neutral on alluvial soil could be responsible factor because low<br />
availability of Zn and Mn for plants occured under these conditions. An important role of<br />
heredity factors on Zn, Mn and Fe status in corn was found in our study because differences<br />
among the hybrids (mean values for two growing seasons and two soil types)<br />
under identical environmental conditions were in ranges (mg kg -1 ) from 26.8 to 36.0<br />
(Zn), from 98.6 to 150.4 (Mn) and from 168.2 to 222.4 (Fe), respectively. It is very indicative<br />
that the first-ranged hybrid concerning grain yield (OsSK458exp: 12.34 t ha -1 ) is<br />
in the group characterizing low concentrations of Zn, Mn and Fe in leaves.<br />
Key-words: corn hybrid, zinc, manganese, iron, pseudogley, alluvial soil, yield<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Soils in the Eastern Croatia have very different properties<br />
including nutritional status. Calcaric chernozem<br />
and eutric cambisol are major soil types in Vukovar and<br />
Osijek area, while pseudogley prevails in Donji Miholjac<br />
and Slatina area, near the Drava bank, the Sava and the<br />
Danube river have more fertile alluvial soils (Kova~evi}<br />
and Ba{i}, 1997). In general, usual fertilization practice<br />
includes application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium<br />
fertilizers, while micronutrients supplies are mainly<br />
adequate for normal growth of field crops although its<br />
availability is related to soil pH reaction. However, under<br />
conditions of the Eastern Croatia sporadically have been<br />
found examples of zinc (Zn) deficiencies in maize<br />
(Kova~evi} et al. 1986, 1988, 1989, 1998). Zn availability<br />
was reduced affected by liming (Mu{ac et al., 1974,<br />
1976, 1982). Effects of Zn fertilization on corn yields<br />
were different depending on soil and growing season<br />
characteristics (Josipovi} et al., 1998; Kova~evi} et al.,<br />
1998; Rastija, 2001). Also considerable influences of<br />
inheritance on Zn status in corn were found. General<br />
aspects of factors promoting micronutrient deficiencies<br />
were reported by Lucas and Knezek (1972), Bergmann<br />
(1992), Mengel and Kirkby (2001). As micronutrient problems<br />
could become a limiting factor of some field crops<br />
growing, we tested zinc, manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe)<br />
status in ten maize hybrids grown on two soil types.<br />
(1) Ph.D Manda Antunovi}, Associate Professor, Ph.D Vlado Kova~evi},<br />
Full Professor, MSc Mirta Rastija - Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of<br />
Osijek, Faculty of Agriculture, Trg Sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek; (2) Ph.D.<br />
Zvonimir Zduni} - Agricultural Institute, Ju`no predgra|e 17, 31000<br />
Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
10<br />
M. Antunoviæ et al.: INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS ...<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The field experiments<br />
Ten corn hybrids were grown on two soil types of<br />
Drava Valley in Slatina area during two growing seasons<br />
(1998 and 1999). The field trials were sown by pneumatic<br />
sowing machine in four replicates (exp. plot 14<br />
m 2 ). Planned plant density (PPD) depended on the<br />
hybrids and it was 71428, 63493 or 58310 plants ha -1<br />
(seed distance in row: 20.0, 22.5, or 24.5 cm: inter-row<br />
spacing 70 cm). The remaining soil crop management<br />
practices were in competency of own choice of farmer.<br />
Fertilisation was the same on both localities: 120 kg ha -<br />
1 N, 80 kg ha -1 P 2<br />
O 5<br />
, 120 kg ha -1 K 2<br />
O (200 kg ha -1 UREA<br />
and 400 kg ha -1 NPK- 10:20:30). For this reason,<br />
results of these trials are reflection of the real status in<br />
fields. Corn was harvested by hand in the first decade<br />
of October. Grain yields were calculated for 14% moisture<br />
and 90% realization of PPD basis.<br />
The ear-leaf at the beginning of silking stage (the<br />
second decade of July) was taken for chemical analysis<br />
(about 25 leaves in the mean sample) from each plot.<br />
Mean soil sample was taken by auger to 30 cm depth<br />
from each experimental plot in autumn 1997. The total<br />
amount of Zn, Mn and Fe in corn leaves and soil samples<br />
was measured by ICP-AES technique after their<br />
microwave digestion using concentrated HNO 3<br />
+H 2<br />
O 2<br />
.<br />
Mobile fraction of these elements in soils was also<br />
determined by ICP-AES technique after their extraction<br />
by ammonium acetate-EDTA (pH 4.65) solution by<br />
Lakanen and Ervio method (1971). Plant and soil analysis<br />
was made in the laboratory of Research Institute for<br />
Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry (RISSAC),<br />
Budapest.<br />
Table 1. Some soil properties of the Sopje experimental fields<br />
Tablica 1. Svojstva tla pokusnih parcela u Sopju<br />
Table 2. Weather data for Slatina<br />
Tablica 2. Vremenske prilike u Slatini<br />
1 approx. air - distance from Sopje: 10 km toward south – zra~ne linije od Sopja: 10 km ju`no<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Antunoviæ et al.: INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS ...<br />
11<br />
Characteristics of the Experimental Fields<br />
Choice of two typical soils of the Slatina area was<br />
made for experimentation. Alluvial soils are mainly<br />
situated near the river Drava bank, while pseudogley is<br />
dominant soil type in the remaining part of the area. In<br />
general, alluvial soil is more fertile in comparison with<br />
pseudogley. Both soils are near Sopje village and they<br />
are about 2 km apart from each other. Alluvial soil reaction<br />
is neutral and contains considerable higher levels of<br />
total and mobile fractions of calcium (Ca), magnesium<br />
(Mg) and phosphorus (P), as well as lower levels of<br />
potassium in comparison with pseudogley (Table 1).<br />
Weather Characteristics<br />
The growing seasons 1998 and 1999 were favourable<br />
for corn growing under Eastern Croatia conditions<br />
(Table 2).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Considerable influences of the growing season,<br />
soil and heredity on yields and ear-leaf composition of<br />
maize were found by our investigations (Table 3 and 4).<br />
Mean grain yield was 11.71 and 10.86 t ha -1 , for<br />
the 1998 and 1999 growing season, respectively. In<br />
both year of testing, corn yields on acid soil were<br />
about 25% lower in comparison with alluvial soil.<br />
Table 3. Influences of the growing season, soil and hybrids on corn properties<br />
Tablica 3. Utjecaj godine, tla i hibrida na svojstva kukuruza<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
12<br />
M. Antunoviæ et al.: INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS ...<br />
Table 4. Influences of the growing season, soil and hybrids on corn properties - AC and BC interactions<br />
Tablica 4. Utjecaj godine, tla i hibrida na svojstva kukuruza – interakcije AC i BC<br />
Higher yields (2-year means) on alluvial soil were<br />
obtained by 3 hybrids (OsSK554, OsSK458 and<br />
OsSK568exp.: mean 14,01 t ha -1 ), while OsSK444<br />
yielded only 11,31 t ha -1 . The high yields (above 10 t<br />
ha -1 ) on acid soil were obtain by four corn hybrids<br />
(OsSK 332, OsSK 444, OsSK458 and OsSK490exp.<br />
(mean 10,84 t ha -1 ), while under 9 t ha -1 yielded<br />
OsSK413, OsSK382, OsSK425exp. and OsS425exp.<br />
(mean 8,76 t ha -1 ).<br />
Mean concentrations of tested elements in corn<br />
leaves found in our investigations (mg kg -1 ) were 30.4<br />
(Zn), 129.4 (Mn) and 190.0 (Fe), respectively. In general,<br />
significant influences of growing season, soil type<br />
and genotype on Zn, Mn and Fe status in corn were<br />
found (Tables 3 and 4). For example, in the first year of<br />
testing higher Zn and Mn, as well as lower Fe concentrations<br />
were found in comparison with the second year.<br />
Growing of maize on pseudogley soil resulted in<br />
56% higher ear-leaf Zn concentrations and more than<br />
double higher Mn concentrations in comparison with<br />
plants on alluvial soil. At the same time, differences in<br />
ear-leaf Fe concentrations were only about 10%.<br />
However, these findings were not in accordance with<br />
status of total and mobile fractions of these elements in<br />
tested soils. We presume that acid reaction and lower<br />
Ca and Mg in pseudogley (Table 1) could be responsible<br />
factors for these differences.<br />
In our study an important role of heredity factors<br />
was found on Zn, Mn and Fe status in corn because differences<br />
among the hybrids (mean values for two growing<br />
seasons and two soil types) under identical environmental<br />
conditions were in ranges (mg kg -1 ) from<br />
26.8 to 36.0 (Zn), from 98.6 to 150.4 (Mn) and from<br />
168.2 to 222.4 (Fe), respectively (Table 3). It is very<br />
indicative that the first-ranged hybrid concerning grain<br />
yield (OsSK458exp: 12.34 t ha -1 ) is in the group characterizing<br />
low concentrations of Zn, Mn and Fe in leaves<br />
(Table 3).<br />
Mengel and Kirkby (2001) cited data concerning<br />
appraisal of the nutrient status of the ear-leaf at flowering<br />
stage of corn: adequate status (mg kg -1 ) are from<br />
20 to 70 (zinc), from 20 to 200 (manganese) and from<br />
10 to 300 (iron), respectively. Bergmann (1992) reported<br />
adequate nutritional status (mg kg -1 ) of corn (leaves<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Antunoviæ et al.: INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS ...<br />
13<br />
opposite ear) from 25 to 70 (zinc) and from 40 to 200<br />
(manganese). Based on these criterions normal status<br />
of zinc, manganese and iron were found in our investigations<br />
in corn.<br />
Zn deficiency mainly occurs on soils with high pH,<br />
especially calcareous soils (Kova~evi} et al., 1986;<br />
Rastija et al., 2002). Also, cultivars of the same species<br />
may differ markedly in their potential to exploit soil Zn<br />
(Cakmak et al., 1996). Similar findings are achieved for<br />
Mn and Fe availabilities (Bergmann, 1992; Mangel and<br />
Kirkby, 2001).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Mainly considerable influences of growing season,<br />
soil type and inheritance on corn yields and the ear-leaf<br />
micronutrients (Zn, Mn and Fe) status were found by our<br />
study. However, low connection was found between yields<br />
and nutritional status of corn probably because concentrations<br />
of these elements in corn leaves were in an adequate<br />
range. The first-ranged hybrid concerning grain yield<br />
(OsSK458exp: 12.34 t ha -1 ) is in the group characterised<br />
by low concentrations of Zn, Mn and Fe in leaves.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Bergmann, W. (1992): Nutritional disorders of plants -<br />
development, visual and analytical diagnosis. Gustav<br />
Fischer Verlag Jena, Stuttgart, New York.<br />
2. Cakmak, I., Sari, N., Marschner, H., Ekiz, H., Kalayci, M.,<br />
Yilmaz, A., Braun, H.J. (1996): Phytosiderofore release<br />
in bread wheat and durum wheat genotypes differing in<br />
zinc efficiency. Plant and Soil 180,183-189.<br />
3. Josipovi}, M., Kova~evi}, V., Bavec, F. (1998):<br />
Response of maize genotypes to foliar fertilization with<br />
zinc sulphate. In “Fertilization for Sustainable Plant<br />
Production and Soil Fertility” (Editors: O. van Cleemput,<br />
S. Haneklaus, G. Hofman, E. Schnug and A.<br />
Vermoesen), Proceedings of the 11 th World Fertilizer<br />
Congress of CIEC (International Scientific Centre of<br />
Fertilizers), 7-13 September 1997, Ghent, Belgium ,<br />
Volume I, p. 270-276.<br />
4. Kova~evi}, V., @ugec I., Berti}, B. (1986.): Poreme}aji<br />
mineralne ishrane biljaka na tlima Slavonije. Savremena<br />
poljoprivreda 34(3-4):133-150.<br />
5. Kova~evi}, V., @ugec, I., Berti}, B., Katu{i}, V. (1988):<br />
Growth retardation and chlorosis due to zinc deficiency<br />
under the conditions of Eastern Croatia. Tagungsbericht<br />
- Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der<br />
DDR, No. 267, p.379-386.<br />
6. Kova~evi}, V. (1989.): Pregled poreme}aja mineralne<br />
ishrane kukuruza na tlima Slavonije i njihovo rje{avanje.<br />
Zbornik referata XXIII seminara agronoma, Kupari, 10.-<br />
18.02., <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong>, Institut za ratarstvo i<br />
povrtlarstvo Novi Sad, str. 181.-189.<br />
7. Kova~evi}, V., Ba{i}, F. (1997): The soil potassium<br />
resources and the efficiency of potassium fertilizers in<br />
Croatia (Country Report 10). International Potash<br />
Institute, Coordinator Central/Eastern Europe, CH-4001<br />
Basel/Switzerland.<br />
8. Kova~evi}, V., Kadar, I., Brki}, I., Marketi}, M. (1998):<br />
Influence of inheritance and potash fertilization on zinc,<br />
manganese and iron status in corn (Zea mays L.). In:<br />
“Fifth Congress of ESA (European Society for<br />
Agronomy), 28 June - 2 July, 1998, Nitra, The Slovak<br />
Republic. Short Communications, Volume I (M. Zima<br />
and M. L. Bartosova, Editors), p. 191-192.<br />
9. Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A. (1987): Principles of plant nutrition.<br />
Publ. International Potash Institute Bern, Schweiz,<br />
4. Auflage.<br />
10. Mu{ac, I., Juri}, I., Kova~evi}, V. (1974.): Utjecaj zahvata<br />
melioracijske obrade na promjene kemijskih svojstava<br />
sekundarnog pseudogleja isto~ne Slavonije. Zbornik<br />
radova Poljopr.inst.Osijek IV (1):101.-114.<br />
11. Mu{ac, I., Juri}, I., Kova~evi}, V., @ugec I. (1976.):<br />
Utjecaj agromeliorativne obrade tla Slavonije s nereguliranim<br />
vodozra~nim re`imom na kemijske promjene<br />
povr{inskog sloja i prinos kukuruza. Simpozij “Ure|enje<br />
zemlji{ta - osnova za intenzivnu proizvodnju kukuruza”,<br />
Osijek 18. i 19.10.1976, str. 227.-234.<br />
12. Mu{ac, I., Juri}, I., Kova~evi}, V., @ugec, I., Ma|ar, S.<br />
(1982): The productivity of pseudoglay in Slavonia and<br />
the chemical changes which occur in the surface layer<br />
after meliorative tillage. In: “Proceedings ISTRO” Ninth<br />
Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research<br />
Organization, Osijek, June 21, p. 26-32.<br />
13. Lucas, R.E., Knezek, B.D. (1972): Climatic and soil conditions<br />
promoting micronutrient deficiencies in plants.<br />
In: Micronutrients in Agriculture (Mortvedt J. J.,<br />
Giordano P. M. anf Lindsay W. L. editors). Soil Scie. Soc.<br />
America, Madison, p. 265-288.<br />
14. Rastija, M. (2001.): Reakcija samooplodnihg linija kukuruza<br />
na gnojidbu cinkovim sulfatom (magistarski rad).<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> Sveu~ili{ta J. J. Strossmayera u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, Osijek.<br />
15. Rastija, M., Bukvi}, G., Josipovi}, M. (2002): Response<br />
of corn to zinc fertzilization. International Scientific<br />
Conference “Energy efficiency and agricultural engineering”<br />
4-6 April 2002, Rousse, Bulgaria (Conference<br />
Proceedings, Volume 1). p. 131-136.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
14<br />
M. Antunoviæ et al.: INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS ...<br />
UTJECAJ TLA I GENOTIPA NA SADR@AJ<br />
MIKROELEMENATA U KUKURUZU<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Deset hibrida kukuruza uzgajano je na dva tipa tla (aluvijalno tlo i pseudoglej) slatinske Podravine tijekom dvije godine<br />
(1998. i 1999.). List ispod klipa u fazi svilanja uzet je za kemijske analize. Pristupa~na frakcija elemenata u tlu<br />
odre|ena je, tako|er, pomo}u ICP-AES nakon ekstrakcije otopinom amonijevog acetata-EDTA. Godine 1998. i 1999.<br />
bile su povoljne za uzgoj kukuruza u isto~noj Hrvatskoj. U obje godine istra`ivanja prinosi kukuruza na pseudogleju<br />
bili su za oko 25% ni`i od prinosa na aluvijalnom tlu. Prosje~ne koncentracije analiziranih elemenata u listu kukuruza<br />
dobivene na{im istra`ivanjima (mg kg -1 ) bile su 30,4 (Zn), 129,4 (Mn), odnosno 190,0 (Fe). Op}enito, ustanovljen<br />
je signifikantan utjecaj godine, tipa tla i genotipa na koncentracije Zn, Mn i Fe u listu. Tako su u prvoj godini<br />
istra`ivanja ustanovljene ve}e koncentracije Zn i Mn, a manje koncentracije Fe nego u sljede}oj godini. Uzgoj kukuruza<br />
na aluvijalnom tlu rezultirao je manjim koncentracijama Zn i Mn te ve}im koncentracijama Fe nego na kiselom<br />
tlu. Me|utim, takvo stanje nije u skladu s razinama mobilne frakcije tih elemenata u ta dva tla. Pretpostavljamo da<br />
bi reakcija tla blizu neutralne vrijednosti mogla biti odgovorna za slabije primanje Zn i Mn. Tako|er, u na{im<br />
istra`ivanjima ustanovljena je zna~ajna uloga nasljednih faktora na stanje tih elemenata, jer su razlike izme|u hibrida<br />
uzgajanih u identi~nim uvjetima u rasponima (mg kg -1 ) od 26,8 do 36,0 (Zn), od 98,6 do 150,4 (Mn), odnosno od<br />
168,2 do 222,4 (Fe). Vrlo je indikativno da je hibrid s najvi{im ostvarenim prinosom (OsSK458 exp.: 12,34 t ha -1 ) u<br />
grupi hibrida s niskim koncentracijama Zn, Mn i Fe u listu.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: hibridi kukuruza, cink, mangan, `eljezo, pseudoglej, aluvijalno tlo, prinos<br />
(Received on 20 March 2003; accepted on 21 May 2003 – Primljeno 20. o`ujka 2003.; prihva}eno 21. svibnja 2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 631.526.325:633.15:631.832<br />
INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND<br />
NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN CORN HYBRIDS<br />
V. Kova~evi} (1) , I. Brki} (2) Preliminary communication<br />
Prethodno priop}enje<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Six corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids (OsSK 377; OsSK 382; OsSK 407; OsSK 552; OsSK 644<br />
and Bc 66-61) were grown on strong K-fixing soil during the growing season 1993.<br />
Increased K fertilization in KCl form was applied in spring of 1990 to level of 3250 kg<br />
K 2<br />
O ha -1 . Four rates were used for testing corn hybrids response (150, 1000, 1900 and<br />
3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ). Response of corn to K fertilization was very pronounced: grain yields<br />
were in range from 1.83 t h -1 (150 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ) to 7.04 t ha -1 (3250 K 2<br />
O ha -1 ). Differences<br />
of grain yields among corn hybrids were from 4.35 t ha -1 (Bc 66-61) to 5.31 t ha -1 (OsSK<br />
407). Significant differences of nutritional status among the hybrids were found as follows<br />
(mg kg -1 ): 18.9-26.5 (zinc), 14.4-17.4 (manganese), 120-144 (iron) and 18.2-23.2<br />
(copper), respectively. Zinc status in corn leaves was independent on applied fertilization,<br />
while the concentration of manganese, iron and copper was significantly decreased<br />
by application of the highest KCl rate (mg kg -1 : 17.4 and 12.6 Mn, 150 and 120 Fe, 21.5<br />
and 18.5 Cu, for the control and 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 , respectively). As affected by KCl fertilization<br />
there were found considerable differences in K and Mg status of corn leaves as<br />
follows: 0.31% K (acute K deficiency) and 1.18% K, as well as 1.08% Mg and 0.47% Mg,<br />
for the control and 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 , respectively.<br />
Key- words: corn, yield, hybrids, fertilization, potassium, magnesium, zinc, manganese,<br />
iron, copper, ear-leaf status<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Potassium deficiency in connections with K-fixation<br />
and magnesium excess are main reasons for reduced<br />
soil fertility of some gleysols of Croatia concerning<br />
corn growth (Kova~evi} and Ba{i}, 1997). Similar phenomenon<br />
is found in Hungary (Kadar et al., 1991).<br />
Fertilization by the enormous quantities of K was shown<br />
as acceptable solution, but by choice of more tolerant<br />
genotypes it is possible to contribute to overcoming of<br />
this problem (Kova~evi} and Vujevi}, 1994). Influenc of<br />
this fertilization on yield, potassium (K) and magnesium<br />
(Mg) status were elaborated in the previous study<br />
(Kova~evi} et al., 1996). As nutritional unbalances are<br />
possible due to ameliorative fertilization, we tested zinc<br />
(Zn), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe) and copper (Cu) status<br />
in six corn hybrids affected by KCl application on strong<br />
K-fixing soil. General aspects of Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu nutrition<br />
of plants were showed by Bergmann (1992),<br />
Mengel and Kirkby (2001), etc.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The field trial with increased K fertilization (in KCl<br />
form up to level of 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ) was conducted on<br />
strong K-fixing soil in spring of 1990. It was conducted<br />
by randomized block design in four replications. In the<br />
next three years, the trial was fertilized uniformly (ordinary<br />
fertilization related to soil nutrient status). In the<br />
fourth year of testing (the growing season of 1993) in<br />
total 12 corn hybrids grown on this field ordinary fertilization<br />
practice was applied as follows (kg ha -1 ): 240 N<br />
+ 125 P 2<br />
O 5<br />
+ 150 K 2<br />
O. Six corn hybrids (OsSK377,<br />
OsSK382, OsSK407, OsSK552, OsSK644 and Bc66-<br />
61) and four rates of KCl fertilization (150, 1000, 1900<br />
and 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ) were chosen for leaf analyses<br />
(the ear-leaf at the beginning of silking stage: 30 leaves<br />
(1) Ph.D Vlado Kova~evi}, Full Professor – J.J. Strossmayer University of<br />
Osijek, Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek, Trg Sv. Trojstva 3, HR-31000<br />
Osijek Croatia, (2) Ph.D Ivan Brki} - Agricultural Institute in Osijek, Ju`no<br />
predgra|e 17, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
16<br />
V. Kovaèevi} et al.: INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL ...<br />
in mean sample, total 96 samples). Corn was sown in<br />
April 28, and it was harvested in September 24, 1993.<br />
Grain yields were expressed on the realized plant density<br />
with corrections for contribution of the female-sterile<br />
plants and 14 % moisture basis.<br />
Chemical analyses were made by ICP technique in<br />
the Research Institute for Soil Science and Agricultural<br />
Chemistry of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,<br />
Budapest, Hungary.<br />
Soil was classified as drained gleysol on calcareous<br />
loess substrate. By the soil analyses (0-30 cm of<br />
depth) of the control treatment (ordinary K fertilization)<br />
values were found as follows: pH in 0.1 m KCl = 7.3;<br />
organic matter content = 2.4 %; carbonate content =<br />
14.9 %; exchangeable K by 1n NH 4<br />
-Acetate (pH = 7.0)<br />
solution = 5.6 mg K 100 g -1 ; lightly exchangeable Mg<br />
(CaCl 2<br />
-method) = 37.6 mg Mg 100 g -1 ; exchangeable<br />
calcium (NH 4<br />
-Acetate) = 603 mg Ca 100 g -1 .<br />
Micronutrient status in the soil sample was determined<br />
by extraction with NH 4<br />
-Acetate +EDTA (pH 4,65)<br />
according to Lakanen-Ervio (1971) method (mg kg -1 :<br />
0.57 Zn, 57 Mn, 305 Fe and 5.2 Cu, respectively).<br />
Weather conditions in the growing season of 1993<br />
were less favourable for corn growing mainly because<br />
of drought stress during the two-month period (July and<br />
August).<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Mean concentrations of tested nutrients found by<br />
our study were as follows (mg kg -1 ): 23.4 (zinc), 16.0<br />
(manganese), 131 (iron) and 19.8 (copper), respectively<br />
(Table 1). Golmick et al. (1970) reported appraisal<br />
of the nutrient status in the ear-leaf of corn at flowering<br />
stage and ranges (mg kg -1 ) from 20 to 70 (zinc), from<br />
20 to 200 (manganese) from 10 to 300 (iron) and from<br />
6 to 50 (copper) as adequate for normal growth of corn.<br />
According to this criterion low concentrations of Mn and<br />
moderate concentrations of Zn were found by our<br />
testing.<br />
As affected by applied KCl fertilization, the concentrations<br />
of Mn, Fe and Cu decreased in comparison to<br />
the control by 28%, 20% and 14%, respectively, while<br />
Zn concentrations were independent on applied fertiliza-<br />
Table 1. Residual effects of ameliorative fertilization with KCl (spring 1990) on Zn, Mn, Fe and Cu status in corn for<br />
the growing season 1993<br />
Tablica 1. Naknadni u~inci melioracijske gnojidbe s KCl (prolje}e 1990.) na sadr`aj Zn, Mn, Fe i Cu u kukuruzu vegetacije<br />
1993.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
V. Kovaèevi} et al.: INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL ...<br />
17<br />
tion treatments (Table 1). We presume that foliar spraying<br />
of corn with manganese and zinc (for example, two<br />
time application 0.75% solution of manganese- and zinc<br />
sulphate in early growth stage and about ten-day interval)<br />
could be a contribution to normalization of corn<br />
supplies with these elements.<br />
Also, considerable role of genotype on Zn, Mn, Fe<br />
and Cu status in corn was found by our study because<br />
the significant differences (mg kg -1 ) were found among<br />
the hybrids under identical environmental conditions:<br />
18.9-26.5 (zinc), 14.4-17.4 (manganese), 120-144<br />
(iron) and 18.2-23.2 (copper), respectively (Table 1).<br />
Table 2. Residual effects of ameliorative fertilization with KCl (spring 1990) on corn properties for the growing season<br />
1993 (Kova~evi} et al., 1996)<br />
Tablica 2. Naknadni u~inci melioracijske gnojidbe s KCl (prolje}e 1990.g) na svojstva kukuruza u vegetaciji 1993.<br />
(Kova~evi} i sur., 1996.)<br />
*100% (plants ha -1 ) = 68027 (OsSK377); 63492 (OsSK382, OsSK407 and OsSK552) and 54945 (OsSK644 and Bc66-61)<br />
* 100% (biljaka ha -1 ) = 68027 (OsSK377); 63492 (OsSK382, OsSK407 i OsSK552) i 54945 (OsSK644 i Bc66-61)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
18<br />
V. Kovaèevi} et al.: INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL ...<br />
Three hybrids had considerably lower Zn concentrations<br />
(OsSK377, OsSK382 and OsSK407: mean<br />
21.0 mg Zn kg -1 ) in comparison with remaining three<br />
tested hybrids (mean 25.6 mg Zn kg -1 ). Especially low<br />
Mn concentrations were found in two hybrids<br />
(OsSK407 and OsSK552: mean 14.8 mg Zn kg -1 ),<br />
while in the other four hybrids they were higher (mean<br />
16.5 mg Zn kg -1 ). The hybrids Os377, Os382 and<br />
Bc66-61 had higher Fe concentrations (mean 140 mg<br />
Fe kg -1 ) than remaining three tested hybrids (mean 122<br />
mg Fe kg -1 ). Two hybrids (Os382 and OsSK552) were<br />
separated by higher Cu concentrations (mean 21.8 mg<br />
Cu kg -1 ) from the remaining hybrids (mean 18.7 mg Cu<br />
kg -1 ).<br />
However, K deficiency in corn was the main reason<br />
for application ameliorative rates of KCl in this experiment.<br />
As affected by ameliorative K fertilization, grain<br />
yield increased near fourfold in comparison with ordinary<br />
fertilization (Table 2). Differences of grain yields<br />
among the hybrids were in range from 4.35 t ha -1 (Bc<br />
66-61) to 5.31 t ha -1 (OsSK407). Degree of tolerance to<br />
soil stress conditions was estimated throughout grain<br />
yields achieved on the control. Corn hybrids OsSK377<br />
and OsSK382 could be designated as something more<br />
tolerant because their yield (on the average 2.31 t ha -1 )<br />
is on the average 44% higher compared to the other four<br />
tested hybrids (on the average 1.60 t ha -1 ). Potassium<br />
fertilization has been a factor of stabilization of grain<br />
yield in genotype function. For example, yield differences<br />
among corn hybrids were relatively higher when<br />
grown on the control treatment (range from 1.54 t ha -1<br />
to 2.47 t ha -1 ) compared to the highest rate of K fertilization<br />
(range from 6.56 t ha -1 to 7.73 t ha -1 ).<br />
Normalization of K nutrition was a considerable<br />
factor of plant density realization. For example, under<br />
soil stress conditions (the control treatment) plant density<br />
realization was on the average 32% lower in comparison<br />
with plan (theoretical plant density), while under<br />
normal conditions this reduction was on the average<br />
about 6% only (Table 2). We presume that dynamics of<br />
the early growth (especially root development) and<br />
overcoming of drought stress at the beginning of the<br />
plant development could be in connection with differences<br />
of plant density realization under different K supplies<br />
degrees. Connection between drought resistance and K<br />
nutrition was also found in corn by Mukherje (1982).<br />
Lodging at maturity stage is in close connection<br />
with soil K status. For example, it was on the average<br />
27% and 4% under soil stress and normal soil condition,<br />
respectively. However, considerable differences of<br />
lodging incidences were found among tested corn<br />
hybrids. Hybrids OsSK644 and Bc66-61 are more tolerant<br />
to lodging under soil stress conditions compared to<br />
OsSK382 and OsSK377 ones (Table 2). Also, grain moisture<br />
was 34% on the average at harvest time under soil<br />
stress conditions, while under normal conditions about<br />
25% only. Close relationship between corn status and<br />
lodging tolerance (disease resistance) was also found<br />
by other studies (Liebhardt and Murdock, 1965;<br />
Kova~evi} and Vukadinovi}, 1992).<br />
Acute K deficiency and oversupply of Mg<br />
(Bergmann, 1992) were found in corn under soil stress<br />
conditions. Also, antagonism between K and Mg (Ca)<br />
uptake was very expressed. Influences of KCl fertilization<br />
on K and Mg status in corn were elaborated in detail<br />
by Kova~evi} et al. (1996).<br />
CONCLUSIONS<br />
Ameliorative fertilization with KCl influenced considerably<br />
decreasing Mn, Fe and Cu concentrations in<br />
corn leaves, while Zn concentrations were similar to the<br />
control. Also, considerable differences in Zn, Mn, Fe and<br />
Cu status in corn were found among the hybrids. In<br />
general, under soil stress conditions induced by K deficiency<br />
and Mg oversupply, corn grain yields were on the<br />
average 75% lower. Relations between K and Mg uptake<br />
by plants were normalized by the ameliorative K fertilization.<br />
As Mn concentrations in corn leaves were low,<br />
while concentrations of Zn were moderate, we presume<br />
that foliar application of these nutrients could be contribution<br />
to the higher efficiency of applied KCl fertilizer.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Bergmann, W. (1992): Nutritional disorders of plants -<br />
Development, visual and analytical diagnosis. Gustav<br />
Fischer Verlag Jena.<br />
2. Golmick, F., Neubert P., Vielemayer H. P. (1970):<br />
Possibilities and limitations of plant analysis in estimating<br />
the nutrient requirement of crops.<br />
Fortschrittsberichte f. d. Landw. U.<br />
Nahrungsguterwirtschaft 8, H. 4, Berlin.<br />
3. Kadar, I., Csatho, P., Sarkadi, J. (1991): Potassium fertilization<br />
in Hungary - responses in maize and other<br />
crops. Acta Agron. Hung. 40, 295-317.<br />
4. Kova~evi}, V., Ba{i}, F. (1997): The soil potassium<br />
resources and the efficiency of potassium fertilizers in<br />
Croatia (Country Report 10). International Potash<br />
Institute, Coordinator Central/Eastern Europe, CH-4001<br />
Basel/Switzerland.<br />
5. Kova~evi}, V., Kadar, I., Brki}, I., Josipovi}, M. (1996):<br />
Response of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to potassium<br />
fertilization on strong K-fixing soil. In: Proceedings of the<br />
IX Intern. Coll. for Optimization of Plant nutrition<br />
(IAOPN), Prague, Czech Republic, 8-15 September<br />
1996, p. 458-461.<br />
6. Kova~evi}, V., Vukadinovi}, V. (1992): The potassium<br />
requirements of maize and soybean on a high K-fixing<br />
soil. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 9, 10-13.<br />
7. Lakanen, E., Ervio, R. (1971): A comparison of eight<br />
extractans for the determination of plant available micronutrients<br />
in soils. Acta Agr. Fenn. 123:223-232.<br />
8. Liebhardt, W.C., Murdock, J.T. (1965): Effect of potassium<br />
on morphology and lodging of corn. Agronomy<br />
Journal. 57, 325-328.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
V. Kovaèevi} et al.: INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL ...<br />
19<br />
9. Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A. (2001): Principles of plant nutrition.<br />
Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht/Boston/<br />
London.<br />
10. Mukherjee, I. (1982.): Genotipische Unterschiede in der<br />
Reaktion auf Kalium und in der Anreicherung von Prolin<br />
in Mais im Verlauf des Welkens. Inter. Kali-Briefe, Fachg.<br />
9, Folge 49, 1.-5.<br />
UTJECAJ KALIJEVA KLORIDA NA PRINOS I STANJE ISHRANE U<br />
DVA HIBRIDA KUKURUZA<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
[est hibrida kukuruza (Zea mays L.: OsSK 377; OsSK 382; OsSK 407; OsSK 552; OsSK 644 i Bc 66-61) uzgajano je<br />
na tlu sa sna`nom fiksacijom kalija tijekom vegetacije 1993. godine. Rastu}e koli~ine kalijevog klorida (KCl) dodane<br />
su u prolje}e 1990. do razine 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 . ^etiri varijante (150, 1000, 1900 i 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ) kori{tene su<br />
za testiranje reakcije kukuruza na gnojidbu. Reakcija hibrida kukuruza na gnojidbu bila je vrlo izra`ena, jer su prinosi<br />
zrna bili u rasponu od 1,83 t ha -1 (150 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ) do 7,04 t ha -1 (3250 K 2<br />
O ha -1 ). Razlike prinosa izme|u hibrida<br />
bile su od 4,35 t ha -1 (Bc 66-61) do 5,31 t ha -1 (OsSK 407). Utvr|ene su i signifikantne razlike izme|u hibrida u<br />
koncentracijama mikroelemenata (mg kg -1 ): od 18,9 do 26,5 (cink), od 14,4 do 17,4 (mangan), od 120 do 144 (`eljezo)<br />
i od 18,2 do 23,2 (bakar). Koncentracije cinka u listu kukuruza bile su neovisne o primijenjenoj gnojidbi, dok su<br />
koncentracije mangana, `eljeza i bakra zna~ajno smanjene primjenom najve}e koli~ine gnojiva (mg kg -1 : 17,4 i 12,6<br />
Mn, 150 i 120 Fe, 21,5 i 18,5 Cu, za kontrolu, odnosno 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ). Tako|er, utvr|en je zna~ajan utjecaj KCl<br />
gnojidbe na koncentracije kalija i magnezija: 0,31% K (akutan nedostatak kalija) i 1,18% K, 1,08% Mg i 0,47% Mg<br />
na kontroli, odnosno varijanti s 3250 kg K 2<br />
O ha -1 ).<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: kukuruz, prinos, gnojidba, kalij, magnezij, cink, mangan, `eljezo, bakar, list ispod klipa<br />
(Received on 4 April 2003; accepted on 19 May 2003 - Primljeno 4. travnja 2003.; prihva}eno 19. svibnja 2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 631.524.01:633.15:631.811+631.445.1<br />
RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON<br />
HYDROMORPHIC SOIL OF SAVA VALLEY<br />
B. Šimiæ (1) , V. Kovaèeviæ (2) , Zorica Jurkoviæ (1) Original scientific paper<br />
Izvorni znanstveni èlanak<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
Growing seed-maize is more profitable than mercantile maize, but also riskier, especially<br />
under less favourable soil conditions because parents of maize hybrids are less<br />
tolerant than their progeny to environmental stress, including plant nutrition problems.<br />
For this reason, we conducted the field experiment with P and K fertilization and a range<br />
of maize genotypes (parents of seed-maize) on soil with moderate P and K supplies.<br />
Following application of 382 kg P and 726 kg K ha -1 , maize grain yields increased from<br />
1.93 t ha -1 to 2.86 t ha -1 (3-year means). High correlations were found between grain<br />
yields of maize genotypes and nutrient concentrations in ear-leaf at silking stage (r =<br />
0.82** for P and r = 0.90** for K). Based on these results, we could recommend the<br />
higher P and K fertilization of seed-maize crops on soils of similar chemical properties.<br />
Key-words: fertilization, maize, nutritional status, phosphorus, potassium, yield<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Environmental conditions for maize growing in<br />
Croatia, especially in the Eastern Croatia, are generally<br />
favourable. Possible problems in some growing seasons<br />
are connected with water shortage (Kovaèeviæ and<br />
Josipoviæ, 1998). In addition, low phosphorus and<br />
potassium supplies are limiting maize growth on some<br />
gleysols of Sava valley area (Kovaèeviæ and<br />
Vukadinoviæ, 1992; Kovaèeviæ et al., 1996). In general,<br />
it is more profitable to grow seed-maize than mercantile<br />
maize. However, growing seed-maize is accompanied<br />
by more risks in comparison with growing mercantile<br />
maize (hybrids) since parents of maize hybrids compared<br />
to their progenies are less tolerant to environmental<br />
stresses, including drought and unfavourable soil properties,<br />
mainly low pH and nutritional disorders. For this<br />
reason, we conducted the field experiment with<br />
increased rates of P and K fertilization and different<br />
maize genotypes (parents of seed-maize) on soil characterized<br />
by moderate K and P supplies. Country needs<br />
for maize seed stock has been covered by own seedmaize<br />
production. For example, seed-maize production<br />
in Croatia (Pucariæ, 1992) for the 10-year period (1981-<br />
1990) was 14 894 t annually (domestic consumption<br />
8503 t and export 6391 t).<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The field experiment<br />
Seven maize (Zea mays L.) parents of hybrids<br />
(inbred lines: Os36-16, Os2-48, Os84-44, Os138-9,<br />
Os89-9 Os84-49 and Os86-39) were grown under field<br />
conditions for three growing seasons (1993, 1994 and<br />
1995) on Orubica eutric gleysol. Fertilization treatments<br />
were as follows: a) control (standard fertilization: 180<br />
kg N + 52 kg P and 133 kg K ha -1 ), b) a + 382 kg P<br />
ha -1 as monoammonium phosphate (MAP: 23% P and<br />
12% N), c) a + 726 kg K ha -1 as KCl (50% K), d) a +<br />
382 kg P ha -1 + 726 kg K ha -1 . Ameliorative fertilization<br />
with phosphorus and potassium was made before<br />
maize was sown in the first trial year (March 22, 1993),<br />
while for the second and third year at the field trial the<br />
standard fertilization was applied (kg ha -1 ): 180 kg N +<br />
52 P + 133 K ha -1 (before sowing 200 kg ha -1 urea<br />
and 400 kg ha -1 NPK 10:20:30; top dressing with 200<br />
kg ha -1 calcium ammonium nitrate).<br />
(1) Ph.D Branimir [imi} and Ph.D Zorica Jurkovi} - Agricultural Institute,<br />
Ju`no predgra|e 17, 31000 Osijek, Croatia, (2) Ph.D Vlado Kova~evi},<br />
Full Professor - J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Trg sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
B. Šimi} et al.: RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON HYDROMORPHIC SOIL ...<br />
21<br />
Additional quantities of urea (192 kg N ha -1 ) were<br />
used during ameliorative fertilization for the a and c treatments<br />
for equalization of nitrogen application. For this<br />
reason, total N quantity for ordinary fertilization in the first<br />
year of testing was 372 kg N ha -1 . The field experiment<br />
was set up in the split-plot design with four replicates<br />
then main plot (fertilization treatment) 300 m 2 and subplot<br />
(genotypes) 40 m 2 . Maize was sown at the end of<br />
April/beginning of May. Grain yields were calculated on<br />
theoretical plant density (66,027 plant ha -1 ) reduced by<br />
25% (49,520 plants ha -1 = share of mother parent in the<br />
seed-maize crop) and 14% grain moisture basis.<br />
50.6 K content for extraction at 20 and 80 o C, respectively<br />
(Table 1). The soil contain in the large proportion of<br />
clay (51.3%) is highly compacted. Lowland position in<br />
the landscape was disadvantageous during the period of<br />
water excess.<br />
Weather conditions<br />
In general, weather conditions during the three growing<br />
seasons were favourable for maize, with exception<br />
of 1995 when excess of water occurred at the early<br />
growth stage (194 mm in the May/June period). Rainfall<br />
Table 1. Chemical and physical properties of the Orubica soil<br />
Tablica 1. Kemijska i fizikalna svojstva tla kod Orubice<br />
Comment: very compacted clay soil - Komentar: jako zbijeno glinasto tlo<br />
Sampling and sample analysis<br />
Maize ear-leaf samples were collected at the start<br />
of silking (the middle of July) from each plot (25 leaves<br />
per sample). They were prepared for chemical analysis<br />
by drying (70 o C) and grinding. Plant material was digested<br />
using the wet-ashing procedure by concentrated<br />
sulfuric acid and catalyst Se (Holz, 1973). Potassium<br />
was determined by flame emission spectrometry, and P<br />
spectrophometricaly by molybdenum-vanadium complex.<br />
For soil analysis we used the surface soil layer (30<br />
cm deep) (soil sampling before ameliorative fertilization<br />
- March 10, 1993). Soil test was done by the EUFmethod<br />
(Nemeth, 1982).<br />
Soil properties<br />
Orubica eutric gleysol (before the trial: pH 1 N KCl<br />
= 5.30; humus 1.75% g) is located near Nova<br />
Gradiška, Eastern Croatia. Soil test (EUF method) showed<br />
low plant available phosphorus and potassium (mg<br />
kg -1 ) as follows: 5.28 and 4.18 P content; and 40.4 and<br />
in the 7-month period April-October (Nova Gradiška<br />
Weather Bureau) was 490 mm, 752 mm and 486 mm,<br />
for the growing seasons 1993, 1994 and 1995, respectively.<br />
Rainfall and mean air-temperatures in the critical<br />
period for maize (July + August) were adequate (total<br />
190 mm, 282 mm and 143 mm, as well as 22.7 o C,<br />
22.6 o C and 22.5 o C, for the 1993, 1994 and 1995,<br />
respectively). Excess rainfall in June and July 1994<br />
(total 390 mm) was useful for maize because of its<br />
increased needs for water in this period.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Our results confirmed considerable influences of the<br />
growing season, fertilization and genotype on maize yields<br />
and its nutritional status (Table 2). For example, depending<br />
on the growing season mean grain yields ranged from<br />
1.33 t ha -1 to 3.40 t ha -1 . Especially low yields in the 1995<br />
growing season could be in connection with lowland position<br />
of the soil and excess of rainfall the beginning of<br />
maize growth (May and June rainfall 194 mm). In the pre-<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
22<br />
B. Šimi} et al.: RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON HYDROMORPHIC SOIL ...<br />
vious years of testing, grain yields were similar and considerably<br />
higher (2-year mean 3.29 t ha -1 ).<br />
In general, ear-leaf P and K status were considerably<br />
different among the growing seasons, applied fertilization<br />
and genotype (Table 2)<br />
As affected by ameliorative fertilization, maize<br />
grain yields were almost increased by 50% (3-year<br />
means: 1.93 t ha -1 and 2.86 t ha -1 , for the control and<br />
ameliorative fertilization, respectively). Analogous<br />
values for maize nutritional status (ear-leaf P and K concentrations<br />
at beginning of silking stage) were as follows:<br />
0.29% P and .43% P, 0.86% K and 2.04% K,<br />
respectively. Application of both elements in ameliorative<br />
quantities resulted by 56% increase of maize yield,<br />
while by individual addition of these elements yield<br />
increases were similar (for 45%).<br />
Table 2. Influences of the growing seasons, fertilization and genotype on maize properties<br />
Tablica 2. Utjecaj godine, gnojidbe i genotipa na svojstva kukuruza<br />
*for the 1993 growing season: a = control (372 kg N + 52 kg P and 133 kg K ha -1 ), b = a + 382 kg P ha -1 , c = a +<br />
726 kg K ha -1 , d = a + 382 kg P ha -1 + 726 kg K ha -1 . For the 1994 and 1995 growing seasons all treatments were fertilized uniformly<br />
in range of the control (nitrogen 180 kg N ha -1 ).<br />
** za 1993. godinu: a = kontrola (372 kg N + 52 kg P i 133 kg K ha -1 ), b = a + 382 kg P ha -1 , c = a + 726 kg K ha -1 , d = a + 382<br />
kg P ha -1 + 726 kg K ha -1 . Za 1994. i 1995. godinu svi tretmani gnojeni su jednako na razini kontrole (dušik 180 kg N ha -1 ).<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
B. Šimi} et al.: RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON HYDROMORPHIC SOIL ...<br />
23<br />
For estimation of nutritional status of maize plants,<br />
as reliable criterion is nutrient concentrations in ear-leaf<br />
at the beginning of silking stage. For example, critical<br />
concentrations (on dry matter basis) for high yields of<br />
maize are 0.25% P and 1.90% K (Melsted et al., 1969),<br />
while adequate ranges are from 0.25% to 0.35% P and<br />
from 1.75% to 2.25% K (Barber and Olson, 1968). By<br />
the other study, adequate ranges (leaf situated opposite<br />
the cob at the beginning of silking stage) are as follows:<br />
from 0.25% to 0.50% P and from 3.00 % to 4.50% K<br />
(Bergmann, 1992). In general, according to these criteria,<br />
potassium status of maize in our testing could be<br />
designated as moderate and phosphorus as adequate<br />
for maize growth. Also, acute K deficiency (less than<br />
1.0% K) and low P contents (less than 0.30% P) were<br />
found by maize growing on the control treatment, while<br />
ameliorative fertilization considerably improved both P<br />
and K status to normal levels.<br />
Nutritional status of maize is also under considerable<br />
influences of heredity because under identical environmental<br />
conditions differences were found among<br />
cultivars and hybrids (3, 7, 8). By our testing differences<br />
were found concerning genotype influences (3-year<br />
means) from 0.38 to 0.42% P and from 1.72 to 1.80%<br />
K and being highly significant. The highest concentrations<br />
of tested elements were found in the genotypes as<br />
follows: Os86-39 (phosphorus), Os84-44 and Os89-9<br />
(potassium).<br />
Considerably higher yields (mean 2.86 t ha -1 ) were<br />
found by the Os84-44 and Os138-9 genotypes compared<br />
to Os2-48 and Os84-49 (mean 2.42 t ha -1 ).<br />
Three year means of maize properties (genotype x<br />
fertilization) were tested by correlations (total 28 pairs)<br />
whereas very high connections between grain yields<br />
and ear-leaf composition were found as follows: r =<br />
0.82** (phosphorus) and r = 0.90** (potassium).<br />
Residual effects of application of high levels of fertilizer<br />
were also found by other investigations. For example,<br />
application of 130 kg P ha -1 in form of calcium<br />
superphosphate on calcareous soils resulted in wheat<br />
yield increase for 16% in the fourth testing year<br />
(Shaoling, 2000).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Although environmental conditions in the eastern<br />
Croatia are mainly favourable for seed-maize growing,<br />
phosphorus and potassium nutritional problems could<br />
be a limiting factor of profitable yields. Considerable differences<br />
of maize yields depending on the growing season,<br />
applied fertilization and tested genotypes were<br />
found by our testing. As nutritional status of maize (earleaf<br />
P and K status) were in close connection with grain<br />
yields, based on our investigations, we could recommend<br />
application of more P and K fertilizers for seedmaize<br />
growing, especially on less favourable soils.<br />
Increased inputs as affected by recommend fertilization<br />
are covered by the higher yields of seed.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Barber, S.A, Olson, R.A. (1968): Fertilizer use in corn. In<br />
Changing patterns in fertilizer use (Nelson L.B. Ed.). Soil<br />
Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin<br />
pp.163-188.<br />
2. Bergmann, W. (1992): Nutritional disorders of plants –<br />
development, visual and analytical diagnosis. Gustav<br />
Fischer Verlag Jena – Stuttgart – New York pp.343-362.<br />
3. Brkiæ, I., Kovaèeviæ, V., Vujeviæ, S., Kozumplik, V.<br />
(1997): Inheritance of potassium, calcium and magnesium<br />
status in maize (Zea mays L.) plants. In Plant<br />
Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and<br />
Environment (Ando T., Fujita K., Mae T., Matsumoto H.,<br />
Mori S. and Sekiya J. Eds). Developments in Plant and<br />
Soil Sciences, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in<br />
Japan, Vol. 78, pp.163-164.<br />
4. Holz, F. (1973): Die automatische Bestimmung des<br />
Stickstoffs als Indophenolgrun in Boden und Pflanzen.<br />
Landwirtsch. Forsch. 26:177.-192.<br />
5. Kovaèeviæ, V., Vukadinoviæ, V. (1992): The potassium<br />
requirements of maize and soyabeans on a high K-fixing<br />
soil. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 9(1):10-13.<br />
6. Kovaèeviæ, V. (1994): Investigation of genetic aspects of<br />
corn mineral nutrition in Agricultural Institute Osijek<br />
(1971-1992). Sjemenarstvo, 5: 327-349.<br />
7. Kovaèeviæ, V., Kadar, I., Brkiæ, I., Josipoviæ, M. (1996):<br />
Response of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids to potassium<br />
fertilization on strong K-fixing soil, IX th International<br />
Colloquium for the Optimization of Plant Nutrition,<br />
Prague, Czech Republic, Sept 8-15, 1996, Prague,<br />
Czech Republic, pp.458-461.<br />
8. Kovaèeviæ, V., Josipoviæ, M. (1998): Weather and soil<br />
limitations for maize growing in the Eastern Croatia, In:<br />
Fifth Congress of European Society for Agronomy (ESA)<br />
Nitra, The Slovak Republic, June 28 – July 2, 1998; M.<br />
Zima and Bartosova M.L. Eds.; Short Communications,<br />
Volume II, pp.157-158.<br />
9. Melsted, S.W., Motto, H.L., Peck, T.R. (1969): Critical<br />
nutrient composition values useful in interpretation plant<br />
analysis data. Agronomy J. 61:17-20.<br />
10. Nemeth, K. (1982): Odreðivanje stvarne i potencijalne<br />
raspolo`ivosti hranjivih elemenata u zemljištu pomoæu<br />
metode elektroultrafiltracije (EUF). Jugoslavenski poljoprivredno<br />
šumarski centar Beograd.<br />
11. Pucariæ, A. (1992): Proizvodnja sjemena hibrida kukuruza,<br />
Institut za oplemenjivanje i proizvodnju bilja, Zagreb.<br />
12. Shaoling, J. (2000): Study on the residual effects of<br />
phosphatic fertilizer on calacareous soils. Volume of<br />
Abstracts, International Symposium on Phosphorus in<br />
the Soil-Plant Continuum, Beijing, China, Sept 17-23,<br />
2000; Fusuo Zhang, Ed., pp.37.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
24<br />
B. Šimi} et al.: RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON HYDROMORPHIC SOIL ...<br />
REAKCIJA GENOTIPOVA KUKURUZA NA GNOJIDBU<br />
NA HIDROMORFNOM TLU POSAVINE<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Uzgoj sjemenskog kukuruza profitabilniji je od uzgoja merkantilnoga kukuruza, ali i više riskantan, osobito na tlima<br />
slabije plodnosti. Razlog tome je u èinjenici da su roditelji hibrida kukuruza manje tolerantni od svoga potomstva<br />
prema stresu izazvanog okolišem, ukljuèujuæi i probleme s ishranom. Zato smo postavili poljski pokus gnojidbe fosforom<br />
(P) i kalijem (K) i genotipovima kukuruza (roditelji sjemenskog kukuruza) na tlu umjereno opskrbljenom s P i K.<br />
Primjenom 382 kg P i 726 kg K ha-1, prinos kukuruza je poveæan od 1,93 t ha-1 do 2,86 t ha-1 (3-god. prosjeci).<br />
Visoke su korelacije ustanovljene izmeðu prinosa zrna genotipova kukuruza i koncentracija P i K u listu ispod klipa<br />
u fazi svilanja (r = 0,82** za P and r = 0,90** za K). Na osnovu takvih rezultat, mogli bismo predlo`iti jaèe naglašenu<br />
gnojidbu fosforom i kalijem od uobièajene za sjemenski kukuruz na tlima sliènih kemijskih svojstava.<br />
Kljuène rijeèi: gnojidba, kukuruz, stanje hraniva, fosfor, kalij, prinos<br />
(Received on 25 February 2003; accepted on 7 April 2003 – Primljeno 25. veljaèe 2003.; prihvaæeno 7. travnja 2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 631.51.023+632.954:632.51:633.16<br />
INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES<br />
ON WEED POPULATIONS AND SPRING BARLEY YIELD<br />
Mira Kne`evi} (1) , Marija \urki} (1) , I. Kne`evi} (1) , K. Hajba (2)<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The influence of different tillage variants and low herbicide doses of triasulfuron &<br />
chlortoluron mixture (Dicuran forte 80 WP) on weed populations and crop yield were<br />
studied in spring barley on lessive pseudogley soil in North-Eastern Croatia at the<br />
^a~inci locality in 1999. Tillage had no significant influence on annual broad-leaved<br />
weed biomass production, which was 22 kg ha -1 , on the average. Chisel ploughing and<br />
disk harrowing significantly increased perennial weed biomass by 21 and 44 times,<br />
respectively compared to mouldboard ploughing. The average efficacy of total weed biomass<br />
control was 95, 89 and 81% at full, one-half and one-quarter of the recommended<br />
herbicide dose, respectively and did not differ very much between tillage treatments.<br />
Both reduced herbicide doses ensured very good biomass control of the most abundant<br />
weed populations such as Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., Chenopodium album L., Ch. polyspermum<br />
L. and Polygonum lapathifolium L. No significant tillage and herbicide dose<br />
effects were recorded in barley yields, which ranked from 4.93 t ha -1 in chisel ploughing<br />
to 4.48 t ha -1 in disk harrowing. These results suggested a possibility of mouldboard<br />
ploughing substitution with reduced tillage practices on lessive pseudogley soil and<br />
herbicide dose reduction of triasulfuron & chlortoluron mixture to 50% or more in spring<br />
barley.<br />
Key words: Spring barley, soil tillage, weed populations, weed dry biomass, crop yield<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Rational tillage systems and usage of low rates of<br />
environmentally safe herbicides are of the most importance<br />
in the development of integrated weed management<br />
systems (Swanton & Weise, 1991). Reducing the<br />
tillage practices for cereal crops under different environmental<br />
conditions is a general trend ( cf. Cannell, 1985;<br />
Butorac et al., 1986; Ko{uti} et al., 1998).<br />
The effects of tillage on weed population and crop<br />
performance were reported for spring barley on a clay<br />
and loam soil by Legere et al., 1990. The response of<br />
the weed flora in spring barley on three soil types<br />
(sandy loam, clay loam and silt loam) was described by<br />
Pollard and Cussans (1976) and discussed by Cussans<br />
(1976). The results of low herbicide doses application in<br />
spring cereals under Danish, Finnish, and Scottish conditions<br />
showed that a reduction of herbicide dose is feasible<br />
and successful with considerable economic and<br />
environmental influence (Kudsk, 1989; Salonen, 1992;<br />
Fisher et al., 1993).<br />
In total arable land of cereals in Croatia, barley<br />
covers about 45.000 ha or 7%, and grain production is<br />
125.000 t per year (Statisti~ki ljetopis, 2000). In most<br />
barley fields, chemical weed control is obtained by triasulfuron<br />
& chlortoluron mixture (Dicuran forte 80 WP)<br />
which is registered for broad-leaved weeds and some<br />
grasses at the rate of 15 g a. i. ha -1 at the pre-emergence<br />
or 11 g a. i. ha -1 at the post-emergence application<br />
(Maceljski et al., 2002).<br />
This paper reports the influence of different tillage<br />
practices and herbicide doses of triasulfuron & chlortoluron<br />
herbicide mixture lower than recommended, as<br />
well as their interaction on weed population and spring<br />
barley yield on a lessive pseudogley soil in northeastern<br />
Croatia.<br />
(1) Ph.D Mira Kne`eviæ, Full Professor, Ph.D Marija Ðurkiæ, Assistant<br />
Professor and Ph.D Ivan Kne`eviæ, Full Professor – Josip Juraj<br />
Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Agriculture, Trg sv. Trojstva<br />
3, 31000 Osijek, (2) Kazimir Hajba, B.Sc. – P.P. Orahovica d.d., R.J.<br />
Èaèinci, Croatia<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
26<br />
M. Kne`eviæ et al.: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED ...<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
The stationary field trials started in the autumn of<br />
1996 on lessive pseudogley soil at the ^a~inci locality<br />
in north-eastern Croatia with a winter wheat - maize<br />
rotation. The experimental design was a split-plot with<br />
tillage as the main factor (T) and weed control as the<br />
sub-factor (W). Weed control plots (3.5 x 9 m) were<br />
replicated four times within each tillage plot. Soil tillage<br />
had been performed continuously during 1996-1999 in<br />
five treatments: MP - continuous mouldboard ploughing<br />
to 30-35 depth, disk harrowing, standard sowing; MP-<br />
DH - mouldboard ploughing every second year alternating<br />
with disk harrowing; DH-MP - disk harrowing every<br />
second year alternating with mouldboard ploughing; CPloosening<br />
with a chisel plough to 15-20 cm depth, disk<br />
harrowing ; DH - continuous disk harrowing to 8-10 cm<br />
depth. Spring barley (cv. Jaran) was sown on March 13,<br />
1999 after maize (instead of winter wheat, that could<br />
not be sown in the third year due to the wet Autumn of<br />
1998). Fertilisation was based on 120 kg ha -1 of N, 150<br />
kg ha -1 of P 2<br />
O 5<br />
and 100 kg ha -1 of K 2<br />
O. The top dressing<br />
with 27 kg N ha -1 was accomplished in April at the<br />
beginning of the forking stage of crop.<br />
Chemical weed control was subjected to herbicide<br />
treatments with triasulfuron & chlortoluron mixture with<br />
three ascending dose rates up to the highest recommended<br />
dose, which corresponded to 11.3 g & 1185 g<br />
a. i. ha -1 or 1.5 kg ha -1 of commercial herbicide of<br />
Dicuran forte 80 WP. Sub-plot treatments were: W0 =<br />
untreated control: W1 = one-quarter dose; W2 = onehalf<br />
dose; W3 = full recommended dose. The postemergence<br />
application of herbicide mixture was made<br />
when spring barley was at the tillering stage, corresponded<br />
to Zadoks scale 25-29. The time interval between<br />
sowing and herbicide spraying was 25 days.<br />
Herbicide was applied by knapsack sprayer “Solo” in<br />
300 l ha -1 of water volume at a pressure of 300 kPa.<br />
Weed samples were collected 54 days after the herbicide<br />
application by counting plant numbers and recording<br />
the air dry biomass of each weed species in a 0.25 m 2<br />
circle replicated four times per each sub-plot, i. e. 16<br />
replications totally per each weed control treatment. The<br />
phytotoxic effect of herbicides on crop plants was evaluated<br />
using the 1-9 scale. Spring barley was harvested<br />
on June 17, 1999. The crop yield was adjusted to 14%<br />
of the moisture content.<br />
The analysis of variance was used for testing the<br />
univariate differences between independent groups of<br />
observations. Dependent variables were: weed dry<br />
weight of botanical groups (annual broad-leaved weeds,<br />
perennial weeds, and total weeds), crop density and<br />
crop yield. Tillage and weed control treatments, as well<br />
as their interaction were groups in separate variance<br />
analyses. Particular group-to group differences were<br />
tested by the Fisher’s test (Ott, 1993) using the probability<br />
level of P=0.05. Linear regression analyses were<br />
performed to evaluate univariate correlations between<br />
weed dry weight, crop density and crop yield.<br />
Correlated values were sub-plot averages of repetitions<br />
of the respective variable. Correlation analyses were<br />
performed for total sample and for the each tillage treatment<br />
and each weed control treatments separately.<br />
Weather conditions during the experiment are presented<br />
in the Table 1.<br />
Table 1. Weather conditions during spring barley growing season in 1999 and the 10-year average (1991-2000) for<br />
the ^a~inci locality<br />
Tablica 1. Vremenske prilike u vegetacijskom periodu jarog je~ma u 1999. godini i u 10-godi{njem razdoblju<br />
(1999.-2000.) za lokalitet ^a~inci<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Kne`eviæ et al.: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED ...<br />
27<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
A total of 20 weed species were recorded in barley<br />
weed community, of which 7 were species in mouldboard<br />
ploughing (MP), 11 species were in both alternating<br />
tillage treatments with mouldboard ploughing and<br />
disk harrowing (MP-DH, DH-MP), 9 species in chisel<br />
ploughing (CP) and 17 species in disk harrowing (DH).<br />
Annual broad-leaved species dominated the weed flora<br />
with 12 species, compared to 8 perennials. Species<br />
composition and their dry weight in different tillage<br />
treatments are shown in Table 2.<br />
The proportion of annual broad-leaved weeds in<br />
total weed dry weight was the highest in MP (95%),<br />
medium and similar in MP-DH and DH-MP (76 and 80%,<br />
respectively), still lower in CP (60%) and the lowest in<br />
DH (49%). On the contrary, perennial weeds significantly<br />
increased their biomass proportion in DH-MP, CP and DH<br />
by 10, 41 and 54 times, respectively compared to MP.<br />
Several reports suggested differences in the weed community<br />
under deep mouldboard ploughing and shallow<br />
tillage practices. The reduced tillage generally favoured<br />
perennial species over annual broad-leaved species<br />
(Froud-Williams, 1988; Archad et al., 1995). However, in<br />
some studies, tillage had no influence on selectivity of<br />
the weed flora (Swanton et al., 1993).<br />
Chenopodium album, the characteristic species in<br />
mouldboard ploughing (Froud-Williams et al., 1988) in our<br />
trial had a higher biomass production in DH than in MP<br />
with the biomass reaching 22 kg and 4 kg ha -1 , respectively.<br />
Biomass responses of annual species of Ambrosia<br />
artemisiifolia and Polygonum lapathifolium to tillage intensity<br />
were inconsistent. On the other hand, Anagallis arvensis,<br />
Chenopodium polyspermum, Erigeron annuus and<br />
Matricaria inodora showed the tendency to increase plant<br />
densities and dry weight in CP, DH-MP and DH. Perennial<br />
weed species such as Plantago major, Equisetum arvense<br />
and Convolvulus arvensis clearly increased their dry<br />
weight in disk harrowing, whereas Sonchus arvensis species<br />
was associated only with CP. It is known that soil<br />
compaction increases the abundance of some perennial<br />
Table 2. Weed species composition and weed dry weight on untreated plots in spring barley after 3 years of the<br />
continuous tillage practices (1999, June)<br />
Tablica 2. Floristi~ki sastav i suha masa korova u netretiranom jarom je~mu nakon tri godine kontinuirane obrade tla<br />
(lipanj, 1999.)<br />
MP = mouldboard ploughing; MP-DH and DH-MP = tillage treatments in alternation every second year; CP = chisel ploughing; DH =<br />
disk harrowing; + = weed dry weight < 0.01 g m-2<br />
MP = obrada leme{nim plugom; MP-DH i DH-MP = obrada u alternaciji svake druge godine; CP = obrada chisel plugom; DH = tanjuranje;<br />
+ = suha masa korova < 0,01 g m-2<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
28<br />
M. Kne`eviæ et al.: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED ...<br />
The analyses of variance detected a significant tillage<br />
x herbicide dose (T x W) interaction in DH tillage<br />
with one-quarter herbicide dose by 53 % of control efficacy.<br />
This result is due to an increase of perennial weed<br />
biomass on these tilled plots. Correlations between total<br />
weed biomass and barley yield were negative and poor<br />
in DH tillage (r 2 = -0.1978) and with one-quarter herbicide<br />
dose (r 2 = -0.0964). This suggested that weeds<br />
did not have any influence on barley yields.<br />
The groups are: tillage (T), weed control (W) and<br />
interaction of tillage and weed control (T x W). N is number<br />
of observations in the group, F is proportion of between-<br />
group and within group variance. The means, followed<br />
by the same letter within a column, are not significantly<br />
different at the 5% level.<br />
Table 3. Weed density (plants m -2 ) of selected annual broad-leaved species on untreated plots and efficacy of<br />
triasulfuron & chlortoluron mixture at reduced herbicide dose in spring barley (averaged over all tillage<br />
treatments according to an assessment in June 1999)<br />
Tablica 3. Broj biljaka m -2 nekih jednogodi{njih {irokolisnih korovnih vrsta u netretiranom je~mu i u~inkovitost triasulfuron<br />
& klortoluron herbicida u smanjenim dozama (prosjek od svih obrada prema ocjeni zakorovljenosti<br />
u lipnju, 1999. godine)<br />
weeds such as E. arvense (Bachthaler, 1985), but in our<br />
study it was a less competitive weed species.<br />
After three years of continuous tillage trials, the<br />
results indicated that tillage effect caused some changes<br />
in weed abundance and selection of weed species,<br />
but the time interval was still too short for the record of<br />
directional shifts and the selective tillage effects on<br />
weed composition in spring barley. The analysis of<br />
variance shows significant tillage effect only in DH with<br />
the highest total weed biomass of 57 kg ha -1 , corresponding<br />
to an increase of 149%, compared to MP.<br />
The herbicide efficacy, measured as a relative<br />
reduction in weed dry weight compared to untreated<br />
plots within each tillage, did not differ significantly between<br />
tillage treatments, with the exception of DH tillage.<br />
The average dry weight of total weeds was 108 kg in<br />
untreated and 13 kg in treated plots, respectively (Table<br />
4). Thus, the average control efficacy with this herbicide<br />
mixture was 88%. The best average herbicide efficacy<br />
occurred with the full recommended herbicide<br />
dose, which corresponded to 95% control. One-half and<br />
one-quarter of the recommended dose provided 89 and<br />
81% of the total biomass control, respectively, but still<br />
provided very good biomass control of dominant annual<br />
broad-leaved weeds (94-95%).<br />
The susceptibility of the annual broad-leaved<br />
weeds to low herbicide doses varied among species<br />
(Table 3). The best control efficacy with one-quarter and<br />
one-half herbicide doses were achieved against<br />
Ambrosia artemisiifolia (94-96%), Polygonum. lapathifolium<br />
(93-95%), Chenopodium polyspermum (88-<br />
93%), whereas herbicide efficacy against Matricaria<br />
inodora (79-84%) was improved by increasing the<br />
dose. In contrast, all three herbicide doses were unsuccessful<br />
in perennial weed control, as was anticipated<br />
considering the weed control spectrum of triasulfuron &<br />
chlortoluron mixture. No crop plant injury by this herbicide<br />
mixture has been observed.<br />
Barley yields were influenced by crop density,<br />
expressed in ears number m -2 . The ear numbers varied<br />
from 600 ears m -2 in CP to 573 ears m -2 in DH, with<br />
significant differences (Table 4). Correlations between<br />
crop density and crop yield have been strong, positive<br />
and significant in untreated crop (r 2 = 0.9235*) and in<br />
treated crop with one-quarter herbicide dose (r 2 =<br />
0.8948*). Weak crop competition in DH due to lower<br />
crop density probably influence on the inadequate efficiency<br />
of the lowest herbicide dose as was reported by<br />
Courtney (1991), Richards and Davies (1991) and Pallutt<br />
(1999). This was caused by unfavourable weather conditions<br />
in 1999. Namely, the barley growing season was<br />
extremely wet with 138 mm more precipitation in June,<br />
than the average of 89 mm in 1991-2000 (Table 1).<br />
In spite of that, tillage had no significant effect on<br />
barley yields, which ranked from 4.93 t to 4.72 t and<br />
4.48 t ha -1 in CP, MP and DH, respectively (Table 4).<br />
This result concurs with some earlier finding by other<br />
authors (Brown and North, 1984; Butorac et al., 1986;<br />
Ko{uti} et al., 1998) that suggested that reduction of tillage<br />
was not always associated with significant crop<br />
yield reduction. The same conclusion can be drawn<br />
regarding the influence of herbicide doses on barley<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Kne`eviæ et al.: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED ...<br />
29<br />
Table 4. Influence of tillage, the herbicide doses and tillage x weed control interaction on weed biomass, crop density<br />
and grain yield of spring barley in 1999<br />
Tablica 4. Utjecaj obrade tla, herbicidnih doza i njihova interakcija na suhu masu korova, sklop i prinos jarog je~ma u<br />
1999. godini<br />
yields, which did not differ either between the treatments<br />
with the recommended and reduced doses or<br />
even between untreated controls.<br />
In conclusion, the results suggested a possibility of<br />
mouldboard ploughing substitution with reduced tillage<br />
practices on lessive pseudogley soil for spring barley.<br />
The reduced herbicide doses of triasulfuron & chlortoluron<br />
mixture to 50% or more provided adequate control<br />
of annual broad-leaved weeds in terms of barley yield,<br />
although the efficacy was lower than that obtained by<br />
the recommended doses. The efficacy of one quarter<br />
herbicide dose was not successful in controlling of<br />
perennial weed biomass after disk harrowing tillage but<br />
it had no influence on barley yields.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Arshad, M.A., Gill, K. S., Coy, G. R. (1995): Barley,<br />
canola, and weed growth with decreasing tillage in a<br />
cold, semiarid climate. Agron. J. 87, 49-55.<br />
2. Bachthaler, G. (1985): Changes in the weed population<br />
of Bavaria. Comparison of the results of regional evaluations<br />
for survey periods 1948 -1955 and 1979-1980.<br />
Bayer. Landwirtsch. Jahrb. 62, 60-75.<br />
3. Brown, N.J., North, P.F. (1984): Tillage under controlled<br />
conditions its effect on emergence and yield of spring<br />
barley. J. Agric. Sci. 102, 181-189.<br />
4. Butorac, A., @ugec, I., Ba{i}, F. (1986.): Stanje i perspektive<br />
reducirane obrade tla u svijetu i u nas.<br />
Poljoprivredne aktualnosti 25, 159.-262.<br />
5. Cannell, R.Q. (1985): Reduced tillage in northwest<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
30<br />
M. Kne`eviæ et al.: INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED ...<br />
Europe: a review. Soil Tillage Res, 5, 129-177.<br />
6. Courtney, A.D. (1991): The role of competition in developing<br />
an appropriate rate strategy for weed control in<br />
spring barley. Proc. Brighton Crop Protec. Conf.<br />
–Weeds, 1217-1224.<br />
7. Cussans, G.W. (1976): The influence of changing<br />
husbandry on weeds and weed control in arable crops.<br />
Proc. Brighton Crop Protec. Conf.- Weeds, 1001-1008.<br />
8. Fischer, N.M., Davies, D.H.K., Whytock, G.P. (1993):<br />
Reliability of broad-leaved weed control in cereals using<br />
low doses of herbicide. Proc. Brighton Crop Protec.<br />
Conf.- Weeds, 1223-1228.<br />
9. Froud-Williams, R.J., (1988): Changes in weed flora<br />
with different tillage and agronomic management<br />
systems. In (eds. Altieri M.A. & Liebman, M.) Weed<br />
Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological<br />
Approaches, pp. 213-236. CRC Press, Boca Raton.<br />
10. Ko{uti}, S., Filipovi}, D., Gospodari}, Z. (1998):<br />
Influence of different soil tillage systems on yield, energy<br />
and lobour requirement in spring barley production.<br />
Poljoprivreda 4, 67-75.<br />
11. Kudsk, P. (1989): Experiences with reduced herbicide<br />
doses in Denmark and development of the concept of<br />
factor adjusted doses. Proc. Brighton Crop Protec.<br />
Conf.- Weeds, 545-554.<br />
12. Légère A., Samson, N., Lemieux, C., Rioux, R. (1990):<br />
Effects of weed management and reduced tillage on<br />
weed populations and barley yields. Proc.7 th EWRS<br />
Symp. Integrated Weed Management in Cereals, 111-<br />
118.<br />
13. Maceljski, M., Hrlec, G., Ostoji}, Z., Cvjetkovi}, B.<br />
(2002.): Pregled sredstava za za{titu bilja u Hrvatskoj.<br />
Glasilo biljne za{tite 2-3, 61.-177.<br />
14. Ott, R.L. (1993): An introduction to statistical methods<br />
and data analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, 1051 p.<br />
15. Pallutt, B. (1999): Possibilities and limits of using seed<br />
rate and nitrogen fertilisation to decrease weed infestation<br />
and herbicide input in cereals. Proc. 11 th EWRS<br />
Symp., 114.<br />
16. Pollard, F., Cussans, G.W. (1976): The influence of tillage<br />
on the weed flora of four sites sown to successive<br />
crops of spring barley. Proc. Brighton Crop Protec.<br />
Conf.-Weeds, 1019-1028.<br />
17. Richards, M.C., Davies, D.H.K. (1991): Potential for<br />
reducing herbicide inputs/rates with more competitive<br />
cereal cultivars. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. -Weeds,<br />
1233-1240.<br />
18. Salonen, J. (1992): Efficacy of reduced herbicide doses<br />
in spring cereals of different competitive ability. Weed<br />
Res. 32, 483-491.<br />
19. Swanton, C.J., Weise, S.F. (1991): Integrated weed<br />
management: The rationale and approach. Weed Tech.<br />
5, 567-663.<br />
20. Swanton, C.J., Clements, D.R., Derksen, D.A. (1993):<br />
Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical<br />
framework for research and management. Weed<br />
Tech. 7, 286-297.<br />
21. ............ Statisti~ki ljetopis (2000.): Poljoprivreda, lov i<br />
{umarstvo R. Hrvatske, 540 p.<br />
UTJECAJ OBRADE TLA I NISKIH HERBICIDNIH DOZA NA KOROVNU POPULACIJU I<br />
PRINOS JAROG JE^MA<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Utjecaj nekih varijanta reduciranih obrada tla i smanjenih doza herbicidnog pripravka Dicurana forte 80 WP na<br />
korovnu populaciju i prinos jarog je~ma ispitivan je na lesiviranom pseudogleju na lokalitetu ^a~inci u 1999. godini.<br />
Najbrojnije korovne vrste bile su iz skupine jednogodi{njih dvosupnica: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L., Chenopodium<br />
album L., Chenopodium polyspermum L. i Polygonum lapathifolium L. Obrada tla nije zna~ajno utjecala na produkciju<br />
suhe mase te korovne skupine, ~ija je prosje~na masa iznosila 22 kg ha -1 . Reducirane obrade tla (tanjuranje svake<br />
druge godine u izmjeni s oranjem, oranje s chisel plugom i kontinuirano tanjuranje) pove}ale su masu vi{egodi{njih<br />
korova za 10 do 54 puta prema konvencionalnoj obradi. Herbicidni pripravak u dozama od 100%, 50% i 25% preporu~ene<br />
doze postigao je dobru prosje~nu u~inkovitost od 95, 89 i 81%. Obrada tla i smanjenje herbicidnih doza nisu<br />
zna~ajno utjecali na prinose usjeva, koji su varirali u prosjeku od 4,93 t ha -1 u obradi s chisel plugom do 4,48 t ha -1<br />
u obradi kontinuiranim tanjuranjem, bez statisti~kih razlika. Rezultati su pokazali mogu}nost zamjene konvencionalne<br />
obrade s reduciranim oblicima obrada na pseudogleju uz uporabu smanjenih doza herbicidnog pripravka<br />
Dicurana forte 80 WP za 50% i vi{e u proizvodnji jarog je~ma.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: jari je~am, obrada tla, korovne populacije, suha masa korova, prinos je~ma<br />
(Received on 19 March 2003; accepted on 30 April 2003 - Primljeno 19. o`ujka 2003.; prihva}eno 30. travnja 2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 631.111.2:633.63:632.26<br />
PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE<br />
REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD OSJETLJIVOSTI NA CERKOSPORU<br />
(Cercospora beticola Sacc.)<br />
A. Kristek (1) , Zvjezdana Magud (2) , Manda Antunoviæ (1) , Suzana Kristek (1) Izvorni znanstveni èlanak<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Proizvodne vrijednosti monogermnih CMS linija šeæerne repe i njihovu otpornost na C.<br />
beticolu istra`ivali smo u <strong>Osijeku</strong> tijekom dvije godine (2001., 2002.) u uvjetima prirodne<br />
infekcije i potpune zaštite fungicidima. Vrednovanje je izvršeno preko pokazatelja prinosa<br />
i kvalitete korijena te vizualnom ocjenom ošteæenja listova. U istra`ivanju je bilo 28<br />
CMS genetski divergentnih linija i 2 standarda. Rezultati istra`ivanja ukazuju na postignuti<br />
napredak u oplemenjivanju i obeæavajuæu vrijednost monogermnih CMS linija, koje<br />
je moguæe koristiti za dobivanje novih hibrida i daljnje genetsko unapreðenje. Tri ispitivane<br />
linije postigle su visok prinos korijena na razini standarda, a èak deset linija imalo<br />
je istu ili veæu digestiju od boljeg standarda. Utvrðeno je da je upotrebom fungicida u<br />
odnosu na nezaštiæene varijante prosjeèno poveæan prinos korijena za 7,09 t/ha (16%),<br />
digestija za 0,81% (rel. 5%) i prinos šeæera za 1,38 t/ha (22,8%). Mjere zaštite fungicidima<br />
više su utjecale na proizvodni rezultat kod osjetljivih linija na C. beticolu, a manje<br />
kod otpornijih linija.<br />
Kljuène rijeèi: šeæerna repa, prinos, kvaliteta korijena, Cercospora beticola<br />
UVOD<br />
Kontinuirana testiranja i ocjene stvorenih selekcijskih<br />
materijala šeæerne repe nu`an su put kojim nastojimo<br />
dostiæi oplemenjivaèke ciljeve. Za uspješnost selekcijskog<br />
postupka potrebno je utvrditi genetske parametre<br />
koji daju uvid u prirodu genetske varijabilnosti razlièitih<br />
selekcijskih materijala. Osim prinosa korijena,<br />
sadr`aja šeæera, kalija, natrija, alfa amino dušika, znaèajan<br />
interes oplemenjivaèa šeæerne repe predstavlja<br />
otpornost prema pjegavosti lista koju izaziva<br />
Cercospora beticola Saac. Ta bolest zastupljena je u<br />
svim proizvodnim podruèjima naše zemlje i redovito se<br />
javlja svake godine. Bolest ošteæuje listove, smanjuje<br />
lisnu površinu i asimilaciju CO2 (Nagel i Leonard,<br />
1940.), zbog èega opada prinos korijena i do 60%,<br />
sadr`aj šeæera mo`e biti ni`i 3-7%, a poveæava se udio<br />
štetnih elemenata (K, Na, AmN) u korijenu repe (Mariæ,<br />
1969., 1974.; Matiæ i Ðurðeviæ, 1970.; Smith i Ruppel,<br />
1973.; Yoshimura et al. 1992.; Smith i Campbell, 1996.;<br />
Lioviæ i sur., 1998.). Jaka epidemija mo`e izazvati gubitak<br />
prinosa šeæera i preko 42% (Smith i Ruppel, 1971.).<br />
Osim toga, korijen zara`enih biljaka te`e se èuva od<br />
korijena zdravih biljaka (Smith i Ruppel, 1971.).<br />
Smanjenje gubitaka izazvanih pjegavošæu lišæa<br />
šeæerne repe mo`e se postiæi korištenjem otpornih<br />
sorata i primjenom fungicida. Kao izvori otpornosti<br />
prema tom patogenu uglavnom se koriste sorte i linije<br />
stvorene u SAD i Italiji, koje su nastale kri`anjem šeæerne<br />
repe Beta vulgaris var. altisima s divljom repom Beta<br />
vulgaris ssp. maritima. Te sorte i linije posjeduju razlièiti<br />
stupanj otpornosti, a izvor imuniteta pronaðen je u<br />
repama iz sekcije Patellares. Meðutim, kri`anje tih biljaka<br />
s biljkama Beta vulgaris vrlo je teško, a i povezano s<br />
unošenjem velikog broja negativnih osobina, koje se<br />
tijekom selekcije teško eliminiraju.<br />
Prouèavajuæi genetsku osnovu otpornosti na C.<br />
beticolu, razni istra`ivaèi dobili su vrlo nejednake podatke.<br />
Tako Smith i Gaskill (1970.) navode da otpornost<br />
prema C. beticoli kontrolira veæi broj gena (4-5), a<br />
Lewelen i Whithney (1976.) jedan gen kod rase C2<br />
(1) Dr.sc. Andrija Kristek, red. prof., dr.sc. Manda Antunoviæ, izv.prof.,<br />
dr.sc. Suzana Kristek - Sveuèilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>,<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Trg sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek, (2)<br />
Zvjezdana Magud, dipl.in`. - Institut za šeæernu repu d.d., M. Divalta 320,<br />
31000 Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
32<br />
A. Kristek i sur.: PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD ...<br />
Cercospora beticola, uz napomenu da taj gen nije efikasan<br />
prema rasi C1. Kako genetska osnova, tako se i<br />
rezultati o naèinu nasljeðivanja otpornosti prema pjegavosti<br />
lišæa šeæerne repe znaèajno razlikuju kod pojedinih<br />
istra`ivaèa. Lewelen i Whithney (1976.) opisuju da se<br />
otpornost u F1 generaciji nasljeðuje dominantno, a<br />
Kohls (1950.) recesivno. Hasegawa et al. (Kovaèev,<br />
1982.) navode da je nasljeðivanje po tipu nepotpune<br />
dominacije recesivnog roditelja, dok Smith i Gaskill<br />
(1970.) te Kovaèev (1982) naèin nasljeðivanja opisuju<br />
kao intermedijalni.<br />
U ovom radu analiziraju se vrijednosti stvorenih<br />
CMS monogermnih linija preko kvantitativnih i kvalitativnih<br />
pokazatelja (prinos korijena i šeæera, sadr`aj šeæera,<br />
K, Na, AmN), uzimajuæi u obzir otpornost na C. beticolu<br />
kao znaèajno svojstvo, va`no u proizvodnji te kulture.<br />
Na takav naèin dobit æe se va`ne informacije, koje æe<br />
poslu`iti pri izboru linija kao komponente za dobivanje<br />
F1 triploidnih hibrida.<br />
MATERIJAL I METODE<br />
Kako bismo utvrdili proizvodnu vrijednost i otpornost<br />
monogermnih CMS linija šeæerne repe na C. beticolu, u<br />
2001. i 2002. godini postavili smo poljske pokuse u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>. U pokusima se nalazilo 28 CMS monogermnih<br />
genetski divergentnih novostvorenih linija šeæerne repe<br />
Instituta za šeæernu repu i 2 hibrida, Os Sana i Kristal, kao<br />
standard. Istra`ivane linije izdvojene su kao bolji selekcijski<br />
materijal u preliminarnim istra`ivanjima na najva`nija<br />
proizvodna svojstva (prinos korijena i šeæera, sadr`aj<br />
šeæera). Najbolje linije poslu`it æe kao majèinska komponenta<br />
za dobivanje F1 triploidnih hibrida.<br />
Istra`ivanja su vršena u uvjetima prirodne infekcije<br />
cerkosporom, bez zaštite i potpune zaštite od cerkospore<br />
fungicidima. Ocjena proizvodnih vrijednosti i otpornosti<br />
prema pjegavosti lišæa šeæerne repe izvršena je preko<br />
pokazatelja prinosa i kvalitete korijena te vizualnom<br />
ocjenom ošteæenja listova, koristeæi skalu od 0 (nema<br />
bolesti) do 10 (potpuno sušenje lišæa).<br />
Izabrani genotipovi posijani su u dva odvojena poljska<br />
pokusa (tretirano i netretirano), prema shemi sluèajnog<br />
bloknog rasporeda u 6 ponavljanja, s velièinom<br />
osnovne parcele od 10 m2 u vaðenju. Tretiranje fungicidima<br />
obavljeno je u obje godine sredinom srpnja prvi<br />
puta (Brestanid 0,6 l/ha + Duet 0,7 l/ha), krajem<br />
srpnja/poèetkom kolovoza drugi puta (Brestanid 0,6 l/ha<br />
+ Rias 300 EC 0,5 l/ha) i u drugoj dekadi kolovoza treæi<br />
puta (Alto combi 0,4 l/ha). Završna vizualna ocjena cerkospore<br />
izvršena je u drugoj dekadi rujna, a vaðenje<br />
pokusa u zadnjoj dekadi listopada.<br />
Vremenske prilike u godinama izvoðenja pokusa<br />
razlikovale su se i utjecale su na tok porasta šeæerne<br />
repe i na razvoj C. beticole. Godinu 2001. u vegetaciji<br />
karakteriziraju prosjeène mjeseène temperature zraka<br />
(17,70 C) za ovo podruèje i poveæana kolièina oborina<br />
u vegetaciji. Meðutim, raspored oborina bio je nepovoljan,<br />
zbog izmjene suhih i vla`nih razdoblja. Tako je u<br />
kolovozu palo 7,1 mm kiše, a u lipnju èak 238,9 mm.<br />
Takve vremenske prilike pru`ale su uvjete za postizanje<br />
zadovoljavajuæe kvalitete, ali ne i prinosa korijena, dok<br />
optimalni uvjeti za razvoj C. beticole u drugom dijelu<br />
vegetacije nisu bili ispunjeni. Za 2002. godinu mo`e se<br />
ukratko reæi da je bila topla i vla`na, povoljna za dobar<br />
prinos korijena, ali i za razvoj C. beticole. Istovremeno,<br />
takvi uvjeti bili su nepovoljni za nakupljanje šeæera u<br />
korijenu repe - digestiju. U ovoj godini temperatura zraka<br />
je tijekom vegetacije bila prosjeèno za 1 0 C viša od<br />
dugogodišnjeg prosjeka, a mjeseèna kolièina oborina u<br />
vegetaciji iznosila je 50-70 mm, s izuzetkom svibnja, u<br />
kojem je palo 155,6 mm kiše.<br />
REZULTATI I RASPRAVA<br />
Rezultati provedenih poljskih pokusa, laboratorijskih<br />
analiza korijena šeæerne repe i statistièke obrade<br />
Tablica 1. Prinos i kvaliteta korijena šeæerne repe u uvjetima potpune zaštite od cerkospore i prirodne infekcije<br />
Table 1. Yield and quality of sugar beet root in the conditions of full Cercospora protection and natural infection<br />
** Signifikantno na razini P
A. Kristek i sur.: PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD ...<br />
33<br />
podataka izneseni su u Tablici 1. Iz prikazanih rezultata<br />
zapa`amo signifikantne vrlo znaèajne razlike u primjeni<br />
zaštite od C. beticole u svim ispitivanim svojstvima<br />
korijena šeæerne repe. Veæi prinosi korijena (51,43<br />
t/ha), veæa digestija (16,98%) i veæi prinosa šeæera<br />
(7,44 t/ha) ostvareni su pri potpunoj zaštiti šeæerne<br />
repe od C. beticole. Razlika izmeðu netretiranih i tretiranih<br />
varijanti iznosi u prinosu korijena 7,09 t/ha (16%),<br />
u sadr`aju šeæera 0,81% (rel. 5%) te u prinosu šeæera<br />
1,38 t/ha (22,8%). U uvjetima prirodne infekcije cerkosporom<br />
bez zaštite, prosjeèna ocjena napada bolesti<br />
bila je 7,4, što je visoko signifikantno više u odnosu na<br />
uvjete potpune zaštite fungicidima (1,9). Utvrðene<br />
su statistièki vrlo znaèajne razlike u rezultatima i izmeðu<br />
godina istra`ivanja. Znaèajno veæi prinos korijena<br />
(57,82 t/ha) i šeæera (7,79 t/ha) na razini P-0,01 dobiven<br />
je u 2002. godini, a veæa digestija (17,37%) i iskorištenje<br />
šeæera na repu (14,58%) u 2001. godini.<br />
Prosjeèna ocjena napada lišæa šeæerne repe cerkosporom<br />
u prvoj godini iznosila je 3,7, a u drugoj 5,6.<br />
Prinos korijena. Osim primjene fungicida i godine,<br />
prinos korijena zavisio je od istra`ivanih genotipova<br />
(Tablica 1. i 2.). Najveæi prinos (55,85 t/ha) u varijanti<br />
bez zaštite i 63,11 t/ha uz zaštitu od C. beticole, postignut<br />
je sa standardom Os Sana. Gotovo isti prinos bez<br />
statistièki opravdanih razlika dobiven je kod linije 25 (MS<br />
1028), linije 20 (MS 1461) i linije 21 (MS 864). Iako je<br />
zaštita od C. beticole znaèajno utjecala na prinos korijena<br />
(prosjeèno 16%), rang vrijednosti linija po prinosu<br />
korijena nije se znaèajnije mijenjao u varijantama sa i bez<br />
zaštite. Tako su najbolje tri linije dale najveæi prinos u<br />
varijantama bez zaštite i sa zaštitom šeæerne repe od C.<br />
beticole. Treba ipak istaknuti razlièito poveæanje prinosa<br />
korijena korištenjem fungicida, ovisno o osjetljivosti<br />
genotipova. Tako je najveæi porast prinosa kod primjene<br />
fungicida utvrðen kod linija osjetljivijih na C. beticolu.<br />
Tablica 2. Prinos i kvaliteta korijena šeæerne repe (prosjek 2001. i 2002.) u uvjetima prirodne infekcije cerkosporom<br />
bez zaštite<br />
Table 2. Yield and quality of sugar beet root (average 2001. and 2002.) in the conditions of Cercospora natural<br />
infection without protection<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
34<br />
A. Kristek i sur.: PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD ...<br />
Utvrðeno je da je kod osjetljive linije 1 poveæanje prinosa<br />
iznosilo 20% (s 39,02 t/ha bez zaštite na 46,82 t/ha uz<br />
zaštitu), odnosno 19% kod linije 16 te 18% kod linije 27.<br />
Kod najotpornijih linija na C. beticolu poveæanje prinosa<br />
iznosilo je 12% (od 38,65 t/ha na 43,29 t/ha) kod linije<br />
4, odnosno 13% kod linija 3, 8 i 25.<br />
Sadr`aj šeæera. Vrlo znaèajna osobina šeæerne<br />
repe, pored prinosa korijena, je sadr`aj šeæera, buduæi da<br />
od ta dva elemenata najviše zavisi prinos šeæera. Pored<br />
istaknute zavisnosti digestije od tretmana fungicidima i<br />
godine, iz podataka Tablice 2. i 3. uoèavamo zavisnost i<br />
od genotipa. Najveæa digestija iznosila je 16,66% bez<br />
zaštite i 17,65% uz zaštitu od C. beticole. Najmanja digestija<br />
bila je kod varijanata bez zaštite – 15,53%, a kod<br />
primjene fungicida 16,11%. Deset linija (18, 1, 17, 22,<br />
20, 21, 26, 27, 3, 2) imalo je veæu digestiju od boljeg<br />
standarda sorte Kristal. Meðutim, treba istaknuti da su u<br />
uvjetima bez zaštite razlike izmeðu veæine genotipova<br />
statistièki neopravdane. Samo dvije linije (25 i 8) te standard<br />
29 imali su statistièki znaèajno ni`u digestiju. Kod<br />
varijante zaštite od cerkospore, razlike izmeðu genotipova<br />
su veæe, pa je èetrnaest linija imalo znaèajno ni`u<br />
digestiju, na razini P-0,01. Tretiranje fungicidima doprinijelo<br />
je poveæanju digestije, osobito kod genotipova<br />
osjetljivih na C. beticolu. Tako razlike izmeðu tretiranih i<br />
netretiranih varijanti iznose od 0,54% (linija 8 – s 15,57<br />
na 16,11% i linija 13 – s 15,93 na 16,49%) kod otpornih<br />
linija na C. beticolu, do 1,08 (linija 1 – s 16,65 na<br />
17,37%) kod osjetljivih linija. Prosjeèna razlika u<br />
sadr`aju šeæera izmeðu tretiranih i netretiranih varijanti<br />
iznosi 0,81%.<br />
Prinos šeæera. Uzimajuæi u obzir èinjenicu da su<br />
istra`ivanja vršena s monogermnim linijama šeæerne<br />
repe, mo`e se istaknuti da je ostvaren visok prosjeèni<br />
prinos šeæera od 6,74 t/ha. Na visinu prinosa šeæera<br />
visoko signifikantan utjecaj imao je i genotip. Najveæi<br />
prinos u varijantama sa zaštitom od C. beticole (8,87<br />
t/ha) ostvarila je linija 20 (MS 1461). Nešto ni`i prinos,<br />
Tablica 3. Prinos i kvaliteta korijena šeæerne repe (prosjek 2001. i 2002.) u uvjetima potpune zaštite fungicidima<br />
Table 3. Yield and quality of sugar beet root (average 2001. and 2002.) in the conditions of full protection by fungicides<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
A. Kristek i sur.: PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD ...<br />
35<br />
ali bez statistièki opravdanih razlika za razinu P-0,01<br />
ostvarilo je još 10 linija (21, 25, 18, 13, 7, 24, 26, 12,<br />
17, 22) i dva standarda. Ostale linije postigle su statistièki<br />
opravdano ni`i prinos šeæera, a najni`i prinos je<br />
iznosio 6,18 t/ha i postignut je kod linije 3 (MS 1281).<br />
U varijantama s prirodnom infekcijom bez zaštite od C.<br />
beticole, najveæi prinos šeæera (7,2 t/ha) dao je standard<br />
Os Sana, a zatim linija 20. Ni`i prinos, ali bez statistièki<br />
znaèajnih razlika na razini P-0,01 postignut je još s 14<br />
linija i drugim standardom (Kristal). Najni`i prinos ostvaren<br />
je opet kod linije 3 i iznosio je 5,17 t/ha. Tretiranje<br />
fungicidima dalo je veæi uèinak u vidu poveæanja prinosa<br />
šeæera kod genotipova osjetljivih na C. beticolu.<br />
Najveæa utvrðena razlika iznosila je 27,3% kod linije 20<br />
(MS 1461). Najmanji uèinak zaštite od C. beticole, u<br />
visini od 18,7% dobiven je kod linije 8, koja je pokazivala<br />
veæu otpornost na C. beticolu.<br />
Pjegavost lišæa šeæerne repe. Ocjena otpornosti<br />
genotipova prema uzroèniku pjegavosti lista šeæerne<br />
repe (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) izvršena je vizualno<br />
po skali 0 (nema ošteæenja) do 10 (potpuno sušenje<br />
lišæa). U uvjetima prirodne infekcije, bez zaštite, jaèina<br />
zaraze na listovima ocijenjena je ocjenom 7,4, a uz<br />
potpunu zaštitu fungicidima 1,9. Meðu istra`ivanim<br />
linijama u uvjetima bez zaštite najosjetljivije linije ocijenjene<br />
su ocjenom 9,8 (linija 1); 9,6 (linija 27); 9,5<br />
(linija 19) i 9,3 (linija 18). Te linije prema ispitivanim<br />
kvalitativnim osobinama pripadaju grupi s veæim<br />
sadr`ajem šeæera, a s obzirom na prinos korijena, razlièito<br />
su rangirane. Linija 18 pripada najrodnijoj grupi,<br />
a linija 1 grupi s najni`im prinosom korijena. U varijanti<br />
bez zaštite fungicidima, najotpornija na C. beticolu, s<br />
ocjenom 4,2, bila je linija 8 i s 4,5 linija 25. Ti genotipovi<br />
po sadr`aju šeæera pripadaju lošijoj, a po prinosu<br />
korijena boljoj – rodnijoj grupi. U uvjetima potpune<br />
zaštite fungicidima, jaèina zaraze lišæa ocijenjena najveæom<br />
ocjenom zabilje`ena je kod linija 1 (4,2) i 20<br />
(4,0), dok je najzdravije lišæe, s vrlo malo ošteæenja,<br />
utvrðeno kod linije 8 (0,1) i 25 (0,2). Kod standarda 29<br />
(Os Sana) otpornost na C. beticolu bila je na razini<br />
prosjeka pokusa (1,8), a kod standarda 30 (Kristal)<br />
utvrðena je veæa osjetljivost (2,9).<br />
ZAKLJUÈAK<br />
Na temelju dobivenih rezultata istra`ivanja vrijednosti<br />
genetski divergentnih genotipova šeæerne repe<br />
(28 monogermnih linija i 2 standarda), u uvjetima<br />
prirodne infekcije cerkosporom bez zaštite i uz zaštitu<br />
fungicidima, na lokaciji Osijek, u 2001. i 2002.<br />
godini, mogu se donijeti sljedeæi zakljuèci:<br />
- prinos korijena i šeæera, sadr`aj i iskorištenje<br />
šeæera zavisili su od genotipa, uvjeta proizvodnje<br />
i zaštite od C. beticole;<br />
- statistièki znaèajno ni`i prinos i kvaliteta korijena<br />
ostvareni su u uvjetima bez zaštite od C. beticole.<br />
Primjenom fungicida poveæan je prinos korijena<br />
za 7,09 t/ha (16%), digestija za 0,81% (rel.<br />
5%), iskorištenje za 0,78% (rel. 5,7%) te prinos<br />
šeæera za 1,38 t/ha (22,8%). Zaštita fungicidima<br />
više je utjecala na prinos i kvalitativna svojstva<br />
osjetljivih, a manje na ista svojstva kod genotipova<br />
otpornih na C. beticolu.<br />
- prema vizualnoj ocjeni, prosjeèno ošteæenje<br />
listova pjegavošæu lišæa šeæerne repe u uvjetima<br />
prirodne infekcije bez zaštite iznosilo je 7,4,<br />
a uz zaštitu fungicidima 1,9<br />
- od 28 istra`ivanih linija, izdvaja se deset s visokim<br />
sadr`ajem i iskorištenjem šeæera, tri s<br />
visokim prinosom, a po otpornosti na C. beticolu<br />
dvije. Najbolje linije bit æe ukljuèene u<br />
daljnji proces oplemenjivanja šeæerne repe.<br />
LITERATURA<br />
1. Kohls, H.L. (1950): A genetic study of 17 F1 hybrids and<br />
their inbred patents. J. Amer. Soc. Sugar Beet Techn,<br />
165-170<br />
2. Kovaèev, L. (1982.): Nasljeðivanje prema Cercospora<br />
beticola Sacc. kod F1 triploidnih hibrida šeæerne repe.<br />
Zbornik «Matica srpska» 62, 151.-155.<br />
3. Lioviæ, I., Kristek, A., Magud, Z., Mertz, R. (1998.):<br />
Osjetljivost linija i hibrida šeæerne repe u uvjetima umjetne<br />
i prirodne infekcije cerkosporom (Cercospora beticola<br />
Sacc.). Sjemenarstvo, 15(5):269.-281<br />
4. Lewellen R.T., Whitney, E.D. (1976): Inheritance of<br />
resistance to rase C2 of Cercospora beticola Sacc. In<br />
Sugar beet. Crop Sci., 16(4):558-561<br />
5. Mariæ, A. (1969.): Pegavost lišæa šeæerne repe.<br />
«Zadru`na knjiga» Beograd.<br />
6. Mariæ, A. (1974.): Bolesti šeæerne repe. Forum, Novi<br />
Sad.<br />
7. Matiæ, I., Ðurðeviæ, M. (1970.): Djelovanje jaèine napada<br />
cerkospore na sorte s razlièitom otpornošæu prema<br />
parazitu. Savremena poljoprivreda, 18:207.-214.<br />
8. Nagel, C.M., Leonard, O.A. (1940): The effect of<br />
Cercospora beticola on the chemical composition and<br />
carbon assimilation of Beta vulgaris. Phytopathology,<br />
30:659-666.<br />
9. Smith, G.A., Gaskill, J.O. (1970): Inheritance of<br />
Resistance to Cercospora Leaf Spot in Sugarbeet. J.<br />
Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 16:172-180.<br />
10. Smith, G.A., Ruppel, E.G. (1971): Cercospora Leaf Spot<br />
as a Predisposing Factor in Storage Rot of Sugar Beet<br />
Roots. Phytopathology, 61:1485-1487.<br />
11. Smith, G.A., Ruppel, E.G. (1973): Association of<br />
Cercospora Leaf Spot, Gross Sucrose, Percentage<br />
Sucrose, and Root Weight in Sugarbeet. Can. J. Plant<br />
Sci. 53:695-696.<br />
12. Smith, G.A., Campbell, L.G. (1996): Association between<br />
resistance to Cercospora and yield in commercial<br />
sugarbeet hybrids. Plant Breeding, 115:28-32.<br />
13. Yoshimura, Y., Abe, H., Ohtuschi, K. (1992): Varietal<br />
Difference in the Susceptibility to Cercospora Leaf Spots<br />
and its Effect on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beets. Proc.<br />
Japan soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 34: 112-116.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
36<br />
A. Kristek i sur.: PRODUKTIVNOST MONOGERMNIH LINIJA ŠEÆERNE REPE U ZAVISNOSTI OD ...<br />
THE PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET<br />
MONOGERM LINES DEPENDING ON CERCOSPORA<br />
(Cercospora beticola Sacc.) SUSCEPTIBILITY<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The producing values of monogerm CMS lines of sugar beet and their tolerance on cercospora leaf spot are investigated<br />
in Osijek during two years (2001, 2002) under the following conditions: natural infection and full protection<br />
with fungicides. The parameters for evaluation were root quality and yield, just as visual review of leaf damages.<br />
Twenty eight genetically divergent CMS lines and two standards were confirmed by the examinations. The test results<br />
indicate achieved progress in breeding and monogerm CMS lines value which can be used for obtaining new hybrids<br />
and further improvements. Three investigated lines achieved high root yield on the level of standards and even ten<br />
lines had the same or higher digestion than better standard. It was found out that in the case of fungicide apply, root<br />
yield increased on the average by 7.09 t/ha (16%), sugar content by 0.81% (rel. 5%) and sugar yield by 1.38 t/ha<br />
(22.8%). Protection measures with fungicides had higher influence on production results of line being susceptible to<br />
cercospora and compared to cercospora tolerant lines.<br />
Key-words: sugar beet, yield, root quality, Cercospora beticola Sacc.<br />
(Primljeno 23. travnja 2003.; prihvaæeno 21. svibnja 2003. - Received on 23 April 2003; accepted on 21 May 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 635.07:633.358<br />
PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRA[KA<br />
(Pisum sativum L.)<br />
T. ^upi} (1) , S. Popovi} (1) , Marijana Tucak (1) , M. Stjepanovi} (2) , Sonja Grlju{i} (1) Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Cilj rada bio je utvrditi prinos i procijeniti stabilnost prinosa zrna gra{ka novostvorene<br />
linije JSG-1 (sorta u priznavanju) te je usporediti sa sortama stranog porijekla u agroekolo{kom<br />
podru~ju Isto~ne Hrvatske. Pokus je bio postavljen na pokusnom polju<br />
Poljoprivrednog instituta Osijek po slu~ajnom blok rasporedu u ~etiri repeticije u razdoblju<br />
od pet godina (1998. – 2002.). U pokusu je kori{teno {est (pet stranih i jedna<br />
doma}a) sorti : Eiffil, Erbi, JP-5, JSG-1(u priznavanju), Törsz i Baccara. Parametri stabilnosti<br />
izra~unati su primjenom metode grupiranja po Francisu i Kannenbergu (1978.) i<br />
modelom individualnih procjena stabilnosti po Eberhart i Russel (1966.) metodi. Po<br />
Francis i Kannenberg metodi sorte Eiffil, Erbi, JSG-1 i Baccara bile su u grupi I, koja se<br />
odlikuje visokim prinosom i malim koeficijentom variranja svojstva te predstavljaju sorte<br />
stabilnog prinosa. Prema koeficijentu regresije i varijanci odstupanja od regresije najstabilnija<br />
je bila sorta JSG-1 (b i<br />
=1,06 i S 2 di<br />
=0,010), dok je najmanju stabilnost pokazala<br />
sorta Törsz (b i<br />
=0,67 i S 2 di<br />
=0,160). U skupinu nestabilnih sorti, adaptabilnih na<br />
visokoprinosne okoline, svrstana je Baccara (b i<br />
=1,22 i S 2 di<br />
=0,034 ).<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: gra{ak, prinos zrna, parametri stabilnosti<br />
UVOD<br />
Jari sto~ni gra{ak (Pisum sativum L.) je kultura<br />
koja se, zbog visoko vrijednih bjelan~evina u zrnu<br />
(Kolak, 1994.), ~esto koristi u hranidbi stoke (Kalivoda,<br />
1990.), a naro~ito svinja (^erny i sur., 1994.). Po<br />
sadr`aju bjelan~evina u zrnu nalazi se izme|u soje i `itarica<br />
(Gatel i sur., 1990.).<br />
Cilj ve}ine oplemenjiva~kih programa je kreiranje<br />
sorti visokog i stabilnog prinosa u razli~itim okolinama.<br />
Vrijednost neke sorte u proizvodnji ne ovisi samo o<br />
ekspresiji genetskog potencijala za prinos, ve} i o sposobnosti<br />
zadr`avanja vrijednih svojstava u razli~itim<br />
uvjetima okoline. Rezultat interakcije genotipa (sorte) i<br />
okoline odra`ava se u adaptabilnosti i stabilnosti sorte<br />
(Borojevi}, 1992.). Sorte {iroke adaptabilnosti daju stabilne<br />
prinose u {irokom uzgojnom podru~ju, dok one<br />
uske adaptabilnosti ostvaruju visoke prinose u povoljnim<br />
okolinama, a niske prinose u nepovoljnim (Oka,<br />
1967.). Postoji nekoliko metoda koje omogu}uju analizu<br />
prilagodljivosti genotipa okolinama (Linn i sur.,<br />
1986.), a temelje se na dva razli~ita koncepta stabilnosti<br />
(biolo{ki i agronomski), koje je definirao Becker<br />
(1981.). Stabilan genotip prema biolo{kom konceptu<br />
odlikuje se {to manjom varijancom u svim istra`ivanim<br />
okolinama, tj. varijanca mu je nula. Prema agronomskom<br />
konceptu, stabilan genotip odlikuje se {to manjim<br />
odstupanjem od prosje~ne reakcije okoline.<br />
U Republici Hrvatskoj ve} nekoliko godina raste<br />
interes za proizvodnjom jarog sto~nog gra{ka zbog relativno<br />
niskih tro{kova proizvodnje, kratke vegetacija i<br />
zadovoljavaju}eg prinosa zrna (Popovi} i sur., 2002.).<br />
Na sortnoj listi RH sve priznate sorte su introdukcije<br />
(Sortna lista 2002.), a u {iroj proizvodnji najzastupljenija<br />
je sorta Baccara. U 2002. godini prijavljena je proizvodnja<br />
sjemena te sorte na 95 ha (podaci Zavoda za<br />
sjemenarstvo i rasadni~arstvo RH). Klimatske prilike u<br />
isto~noj Hrvatskoj (regija uzgoja svinja) jako variraju, a<br />
(1) Mr sc. Tihomir ^upi}, dr.sc. Svetislav Popovi}, mr.sc. Marijana Tucak<br />
i mr.sc. Sonja Grlju{i} - <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek, Ju`no predgra|e<br />
17, 31000 Osijek, (2)Prof. dr.sc. Mirko Stjepanovi} – Sveu~ili{te Josipa<br />
Jurja Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong>, Trg Sv. Trojstva 3,<br />
31000 Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
38<br />
T. Èupiæ i sur.: PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRAŠKA (Pisum stivum L.) ...<br />
time utje~u na visinu prinosa zrna, koja se kre}e od<br />
1,164 do 4,630 kg/ha (Popovi} i sur., 1985. i 1992.,<br />
Stjepanovi} i sur., 1996.). Jedan od osnovnih ciljeva<br />
oplemenjivanja gra{ka je visok prinos, koji ovisi o genetskom<br />
potencijalu sorte. Sorte najbolje iskori{tavaju<br />
genetski potencijal u uvjetima okoline kreiranja i selekcije<br />
te se mogu ciljano kreirati za odre|eno agroekolo{ko<br />
podru~je. Stoga smo u okviru programa oplemenjivanja<br />
gra{ka u ranim fazama selekcije izdvojili i testirali najperspektivniju<br />
liniju (JSG-1).<br />
Prinos zrna istra`enih sorti statisti~ki je obra|en<br />
analizom varijance kombiniranom po godinama<br />
istra`ivanja. Zna~ajnosti razlika prinosa izme|u sorata i<br />
godina testirane su LSD testom. Za procjenu parametara<br />
stabilnosti kori{tene su metoda grupiranja sorti po<br />
Francisu i Kannenbergu (1978.) i analiza regresije (koeficijent<br />
regresije b i<br />
i varijanca odstupanja od regresije<br />
S 2 di<br />
) po modelu Eberharta i Russella (1966.). Stabilne<br />
sorte po metodi grupiranja nalaze se u grupi I, dok su<br />
po modelu koeficijenta regresije stabilne sorte, kod kojih<br />
Tablica 1. Srednje mjese~ne temperature zraka ( °C) i koli~ina oborina (mm) po godinama istra`ivanja<br />
Table 1. Mean month air temperature ( °C) and rainfall amount (mm) for years<br />
Cilj ovoga rada bio je utvrditi visinu i stabilnost prinosa<br />
zrna gra{ka novostvorene linije i usporediti je sa<br />
standardom Baccara i drugim sortama stranog porijekla<br />
u klimatskim uvjetima isto~ne Hrvatske.<br />
MATERIJAL I METODE<br />
Istra`ivanje je provedeno na pokusnom polju<br />
Poljoprivrednog instituta Osijek (tip tla eutri~ni kambisol),<br />
po slu~ajnom blok rasporedu u ~etiri ponavljanja, a trajalo<br />
je pet godina (1998., 1999., 2000., 2001. i 2002. godine).<br />
Veli~ina osnovne parcele bila je 10 m 2 (5 m x 2 m).<br />
Istra`ivano je {est sorti jarog sto~nog gra{ka iz<br />
razli~itih geografskih podru~ja. U pokusu su bile sorte:<br />
Eiffil (Francuska), Erbi (Austrija), JP-5 i Törsz<br />
(Ma|arska), JSG-1 (Hrvatska, u priznavanju) i Baccara<br />
(Francuska, standard u Hrvatskoj).<br />
je b i<br />
=1, a odstupanje od regresije S 2 di<br />
= 0, uz {to ve}i<br />
prosje~ni prinos sorte. Radi utvr|ivanja korelacije<br />
istra`ivanog svojstva i stabilnosti izra~unata je korelacija<br />
ranga (r).<br />
Klimatske prilike tijekom istra`ivanja<br />
Klimatski podaci (srednje mjese~ne temperature i<br />
koli~ina oborine) za razdoblje od 1998.-2002. godine,<br />
tijekom vegetacije gra{ka, prikazane su u Tablici 1.<br />
Prosje~na mjese~na temperatura zraka u o`ujku 2001.<br />
godine bila je vi{a nego u ostalim godinama, {to je<br />
omogu}ilo pravovremeno i brzo nicanje gra{ka. Koli~ina<br />
oborina tijekom perioda vegetacije gra{ka po godinama<br />
istra`ivanja jako se razlikovala, a posebno se isticala<br />
2000. godina kao izrazito su{na. Najvi{e oborina bilo je<br />
u 2001. godini, koja je ujedno imala i najbolji raspored<br />
oborina tijekom vegetacije gra{ka.<br />
Tablica 2. Rezultati analiza varijance kombinirane za jednu lokaciju u pet godina<br />
Table 2. Results of combined analysis variance for one location in five year<br />
*,** F-test zna~ajnosti na razini P=0,05, odnosno P=0,01. / *,** F- significancy test at P=0,05 and P=0,01 level<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
T. Èupiæ i sur.: PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRAŠKA (Pisum stivum L.) ...<br />
39<br />
Tablica 3. Prosje~ni prinos zrna gra{ka (t/ha) po sortama i godinama istra`ivanja<br />
Table 3. Mean pea grain yield (t/ha ) per cultivars and years<br />
REZULTATI I RASPRAVA<br />
Analiza varijance (Tablica 2.) pokazala je zna~ajnu<br />
fenotipsku varijabilnost za prinos zrna izme|u istra`ivanih<br />
sorti gra{ka. Zna~ajne razlike izme|u godina pokazuju<br />
da su godine u kojima su provedena istra`ivanja<br />
bile klimatski razli~ite. Analizom varijance utvr|eno je<br />
postojanje interakcije izme|u prinosa sorata i godina te<br />
je bilo mogu}e analizirati stabilnost prinosa zrna i adaptabilnost.<br />
Prosje~an prinos (Tablica 3.) zrna gra{ka za sve<br />
sorte u 1998. godini iznosio je 2,545 t/ha, a po sortama<br />
se kretao od 1,410 t/ha (Törsz ) do 3.205 t/ha (Erbi).<br />
U 1999. godini prosje~an prinos zrna gra{ka iznosio je<br />
1,623 t/ha, dok je prinos sorti varirao od 0,990 t/ha<br />
(Törsz) do 1,895 t/ha (JSG-1). Prosje~an prinos zrna u<br />
2000. godini kretao se od 1,840 t/ha (JP-5) do 2,885<br />
t/ha (Erbi), odnosno u prosjeku 2,472 t/ha. U 2001.<br />
godini ostvaren je prosje~an prinos zrna gra{ka 5,410<br />
t/ha, dok je variranje po sortama iznosilo od 3,572-<br />
6,353 t/ha (Törsz – Baccara). Prosje~an prinos svih<br />
sorti u 2002. godini iznosio je 3,098 t/ha, dok se po<br />
sortama kretao od 1,600 t/ha (JP-5) do 3,750 t/ha<br />
(Baccara). Razlike u prinosu po godinama istra`ivanja<br />
bile su zna~ajne na razini P=0,01, a zna~ajno najvi{i<br />
prosje~an prinos zrna ostvaren je 2001. godine.<br />
Zna~ajno najni`i prinos ostvaren je 1999. godine, dok je<br />
prosjek za pet godina istra`ivanja iznosio 3,030 t/ha.<br />
Dobivene razlike u prinosu zrna treba povezati s<br />
razli~itim klimatskim prilikama po godinama, a naro~ito<br />
pri usporednoj analizi 1999. i 2001. godine, koje su<br />
sli~ne po prosje~nim mjese~nim temperaturama i oborinama.<br />
Razlike u klimi izme|u navedenih godina mogu<br />
se uo~iti tek pri analizi srednjih dnevnih i ekstremnih<br />
temperatura.<br />
U prosjeku pet godina prinos gra{ka po sortama<br />
opravdano se razlikovao na razini P=0,01. Najvi{i prinos<br />
zrna ostvarila je sorta Erbi (3,493 t/ha), koji se nije<br />
zna~ajno razlikovao od prinosa sorti Baccara, JSG-1 i<br />
Eiffil na razini P=0,01(Tablica 3.). Opravdano najni`i<br />
prinos zrna na razini P=0,01 imao je Törsz (2,116 t/ha),<br />
osim u odnosu na sortu JP-5. Razlike izme|u sorata u<br />
prinosu zrna su o~ekivane, jer se radi o materijalu<br />
(sorta) razli~itog geografskog porijekla. Razlozi ovoj<br />
tvrdnji mogu se potkrijepiti i statisti~ki opravdanom interakcijom<br />
sorta x godina na razini zna~ajnosti P=0,01.<br />
Procjena stabilnosti sorti na prinos zrna gra{ka<br />
izvr{ena je metodom grupiranja testiranih materijala u<br />
razli~ite grupe stabilnosti, na osnovu prosje~ne vrijednosti<br />
i koeficijenta varijabilnosti sorata (Frances i<br />
Kannenberg, 1978.). Prema dobivenim procjenama stabilnosti<br />
testirane sorte razlikuju se u prosje~noj visini<br />
prinosa i stabilnosti te su na osnovu toga svrstane u<br />
~etiri grupe. Grupa I. karakterizira se kao najpo`eljnija,<br />
tj. grupa visokog i stabilnog prinosa, a prema dobivenim<br />
rezultatima u nju svrstavamo sorte: Erbi, Eiffil, JSG-1 i<br />
Baccara (Dijagram 1.). Jedino se sorta JP-5 mo`e uvrstiti<br />
u grupu IV., grupa vrlo velike varijabilnosti i niskog<br />
prinosa, tj. grupa niskog i nestabilnog prinosa. Grupa III.<br />
je postojana, ali prema navodima autora metode smatra<br />
se nestabilnom zbog toga {to je karakterizira nizak prinos<br />
u ve}ini okolina. U grupi III. prema dobivenim rezultatima<br />
nalazi se sorta Törsz. Ako promatramo individualne<br />
reakcije sorti gra{ka unutar grupe I., a posebno<br />
sorte JSG-1 i sorte Baccara, primje}ujemo male razlike<br />
izme|u prinosa zrna testiranih sorti bez obzira na<br />
Dijagram 1. Frances i Kannenberg dijagram stabilnosti<br />
za istra`ivane sorte gra{ka<br />
Diagram 1. Frances and Kannenberg stability diagram at<br />
investigated Field pea cultivars<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
40<br />
T. Èupiæ i sur.: PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRAŠKA (Pisum stivum L.) ...<br />
Tablica 4. Procijenjeni parametri stabilnosti i prosje~an prinos zrna za pet godina istra`ivanja<br />
Table 4. Estimated stability parameters and mean grain yield for five years investigations<br />
razli~itost okolina u kojima su testirane, {to je obilje`je<br />
sorti stabilnog prinosa i {iroke adaptabilnosti.<br />
Promatranjem individualnih reakcija sorata gra{ka<br />
na raznolike okoline, pomo}u koeficijenta regresije b i<br />
i<br />
odstupanja od regresije S 2 di<br />
, mo`e se zapaziti da neke<br />
sorte imaju ve}u a neke manju stabilnost prinosa zrna<br />
(Grafikon 1.). Prema dobivenim prosje~nim vrijednostima<br />
i parametrima stabilnosti, najstabilnija sorta po prinosu<br />
zrna bila je sorta JSG-1 (b i<br />
=1,06 i S 2 di =0,010).<br />
Vrijednosti koeficijenta regresije b i<br />
>1 ukazuju na specifi~no<br />
adaptabilan genotip u povoljnim uvjetima okoline,<br />
tj. ispod prosje~nu stabilnost i ve}u prilagodljivosti visokoprinosnim<br />
okolinama. Sorte Erbi (b i<br />
=1,12 i<br />
S 2 di =0,034 ), Eiffil (b i =1,13 i S2 di<br />
=0,025) i Baccara<br />
(b i<br />
=1,22 i S 2 di<br />
=0,034 ) mogu se opisati kao sorte koje<br />
daju izrazito visoke prinose u povoljnim uvjetima okolina,<br />
kao {to su bile 2001. i 2002. godina, ali ve} male<br />
Grafikon 1. Odnos prosje~nog prinosa (t/ha) i parametara<br />
stabilnosti<br />
Graph 1.The relation of average yield and stability<br />
parameters<br />
promjene uvjeta okoline utje~u na smanjenje prinosa<br />
(1998. i 1999. godina). U skupinu nestabilnih sorti, ili<br />
bolje re~eno specifi~no adaptabilnih na nepovoljne i<br />
niskoprinosne okoline, svrstane su sorte JP-5 (b i<br />
=0,80<br />
i S 2 di =0,257) i Törsz (b i =0,67 i S2 di<br />
=0,160). Iste ostvaruju<br />
iznadprosje~ne prinose u niskoprinosnim okolinama,<br />
ali ostaju neosjetljive na promjene uvjeta okoline,<br />
te se pokazuju kao nestabilne promatraju}i oba parametra<br />
stabilnosti (Tablica 4.).<br />
Izra~unata korelacija ranga bila je srednje jaka za<br />
prinos zrna i iznosila je r= 0,457 n.s. ,ali nije bila<br />
zna~ajna, {to zna~i da sorte vi{eg prinosa nisu ispoljile<br />
ve}u stabilnost za istra`ivano svojstvo.<br />
ZAKLJU^AK<br />
Na osnovu dobivenih rezultata prinosa zrna i analize<br />
stabilnosti {est sorata gra{ka na lokaciji Osijek u razdoblju<br />
od pet divergentnih godina (1998.-2002.), mogu<br />
se donijeti sljede}i zaklju~ci:<br />
Zna~ajnost varijabilnosti prinosa zrna gra{ka uvjetovana<br />
je varijabilno{}u sorte, varijabilno{}u godina<br />
istra`ivanja i varijabilno{}u interakcije sorte i godine.<br />
Najvi{i prosje~an prinos imala je sorta Erbi (3,493<br />
t/ha), a najni`i sorta Törsz (2,116 t/ha), dok je po godinama<br />
najvi{i prinos postignut u 2001. godini (5,401<br />
t/ha), a najni`i u 1999. godini (1,623 t/ha).<br />
Najstabilnije sorte za prinos zrna po biolo{kom<br />
konceptu (Fransis i Kannenberg metoda) bile su sorte<br />
Erbi, Eiffil, JSG-1 i Baccara iz grupe I., dok se sorta<br />
Törsz pokazala nestabilnom (grupa IV.). Prema agronomskom<br />
konceptu (Eberhart i Russel model) sorta<br />
JSG-1 ispoljila je najve}u stabilnost (b i<br />
=1,06 i<br />
S 2 di<br />
=0,010), a najve}u nestabilnost sorta Törsz<br />
(b i<br />
=0,67 i S 2 di =0,160).<br />
Korelacija ranga izme|u visine prinosa i stabilnosti<br />
svojstva nije bila zna~ajna (r= 0,457 n.s ), {to pokazuje<br />
da sorte visokog prinosa nisu i najstabilnije.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
T. Èupiæ i sur.: PROCJENA STABILNOSTI PRINOSA ZRNA GRAŠKA (Pisum stivum L.) ...<br />
41<br />
Dobiveni rezultati ukazuju na visok i stabilan prinos<br />
zrna doma}e “sorte” JSG-1 (u priznavanju), {to ovoj<br />
sorti otvara mogu}nost komercijalnog {irenja nakon<br />
priznavanja.<br />
LITERATURA<br />
1. Becker, H.C. (1981): Correlations Among Some<br />
Statistical Measures of Phenotypic Stability. Euphytica<br />
30: 835-840.<br />
2. Borojevi} , S. (1992.): Principi i metodi Oplemenjivanja<br />
bilja. Nau~na knjiga - Beograd.<br />
3. ^erny Tajana, ^erny, Z., Grbe{a, D., Homen Biserka,<br />
Pintar, A. (1994.): Hranidbena vrijednost gra{ka u tovu<br />
svinja. Krmiva 36(5 ): 211.-216.<br />
4. Eberhart, S.A., Russell, W.A. (1966): Stability<br />
Parameters for Coparing Varieties. Crop Science, 6:<br />
36–40.<br />
5. Francis, T.R., Kannenberg, L.W. (1978): Yield Stability<br />
Studies in Short – Season Maize. I. A Descriptive<br />
Method for Grouping Genotypes. Canadian Journal of<br />
Plant Science, Num. 58, 10291034.<br />
6. Gatel, F., Grosjean, F. (1990): Composition and Nutritive<br />
Value of Peas for Pigs: A Review of Europiean Results.<br />
Livestock Prod. Sci., 26:155-175.<br />
7. Kalivoda, M. (1990.): Krmiva. [kolska knjiga – Zagreb,<br />
40.<br />
8. Kolak, I. (1994.): Sjemenarstvo ratarskih i krmnih kultura.<br />
P.451, Zagreb.<br />
9. Linn, C.S., Binns, M.R., Lefkovitch, L.P. ( 1986.): Stability<br />
Analysis: Where Do We Stand? Crop Sci. 26:894–900.<br />
10. Oka, J.I. (1967): Adaptability for seasons and locations<br />
and yield stability in crop varieties. Recent Adv. In<br />
Breeding (Tokyo) 8: 42-47.<br />
11. Popovi}, S., Stjepanovi}, M., Bo{njak, D., Zori} J. (<br />
1985.): Bob, Slatka Lupina i Sto~ni Gra{ak u proizvodnji<br />
zrnenih proteinskih hranjiva. V. Jugoslavenski simpozijum<br />
o Krmnom Bilju, Banja Luka 5.- 8. juna. Sinopsisi<br />
Referata knjiga I; 120.-123.<br />
12. Popovi}, S., Stjepanovi}, M. (1992.): Genetski potencijal<br />
razli~itih sorti sto~nog gra{ka u proizvodnji zrna.<br />
Sjemenarstvo 9 (2-3):105.-110.<br />
13. Popovi}, S., Stjepanovi}, M., Grlju{i} S., ^upi}, T.,<br />
Tucak, M., Bukvi}, G. (2002.): Prinos i kakvo}a zrna<br />
jarog sto~nog gra{ka. Krmiva 44 (4):191.-197.<br />
14. Stjepanovi}, M., Popovi}, S., Grlju{i}, S., Bukvi}, G.<br />
(1996): Peas production and productions possibilities in<br />
Croatia. Szarvas 1996. Conference of the Production<br />
Field Pea in Hungary May, 20. – 22. 1996. Oral presentation.<br />
15. Sortna Lista za 2002. Godinu. Sto~ni gra{ak. Zavod za<br />
sjemenarstvo i rasadni~arstvo, str. 65, 2002.<br />
ESTIMATION OF PEA GRAIN YIELD STABILITY (Pisum sativum L.)<br />
SUMMARY<br />
The paper aimed to determine yield and estimate pea grain yield stability of newly-created lines JSG-1 (cultivar in<br />
recognition process) as well as compare with foreign origin cultivars in agroecological area of east Slavonia. The<br />
trial was set up by a randomized block design on the experimental field of Agricultural Institute Osijek in four replicates<br />
in the five-year period (1998 – 2002). Six (five foreign and one inland) cultivars were included by the trial:<br />
Eiffil, Erbi, JP-5, JSG-1 (in a recognition process), Torsz and Baccara. Stability parameters were calculated by the<br />
grouping method after Francis and Kannenberg (1978) and by the model of individual stability estimation after<br />
Eberhart and Russel method (1966). According to Francis and Kannenberg, cultivars Eiffil, Erbi, JSG-1 and Baccara<br />
belonged to group I known for high yield and low trait varying coefficient, thus, represent stabile yield cultivars.<br />
According to regression coefficient and regression deviation variance the most stabile cultivar appeared to be cultivar<br />
JSG-1 (b i<br />
=1.06 and S 2 di =0.010) and the lowest one was Torsz (b i =0.67 and S2 di<br />
=0.160). Cultivar Baccara<br />
(b i<br />
= 1.22 and S 2 di<br />
=0.034) was comprised by the group of unstabile and adaptible for high-yielding environments.<br />
Key- words: pea, grain yield, stability parameters<br />
(Primljeno 12. velja~e 2003.; prihva}eno 4. travnja 2003. - Received on 12 February 2003; accepted on 4 April 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 634.55(560)<br />
DETERMINATION OF THE POMOLOGICAL<br />
CHARACTERISTICS OF ALMONDS (Prunus amygdalus Batsh)<br />
GROWN IN MALATYA (TURKEY)<br />
T. Karadeniz (1) , A. Kazankaya (2) , T. Yarilgaç (2) Preliminary communication<br />
Prethodno priopæenje<br />
SUMMARY<br />
About 500 types of Almond were taken under investigated with the view of fruit characteristics<br />
grown in Malatya. In these types, the nut shell weights between 2.73 and 10.74<br />
g, kernel weights were 0.71 and 1.40 g, the percentage of kernel 11.17 and 50.91 %, the<br />
shell thickness 3.5 and 8.1 mm, the nut width 12.0 and 28.6 mm, the nut length 18.2 and<br />
48.2 mm, the fruit hight 7.1 and 20.3 mm were determined.<br />
Key-words: Prunus amygdalus, almond, pomological, Malatya<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The commercial orchards have been planted in<br />
Anatolia for more than 4000 years. Almond is grown in<br />
almost every region of Anatolia, except the North-East<br />
and higher elevations of Eastern Anatolia (Dokuzoðuz<br />
and Gülcan, 1973; Özbek, 1978). Although there is a<br />
great diversity within these populations Turkey almond<br />
production is at present, 50000 tones of nuts from<br />
18000 ha area (Anonymous, 2002). Almond kernels<br />
concentrate energy sources due to their high oil content.<br />
The oil is primarily unsaturated, mostly oleic and linoleic,<br />
fatty acid. The kernels also contain considerable<br />
protein, minerals, and some vitamins (Kester and Asay,<br />
1975). The first attempt for the evaluation of seedling<br />
population of Turkey, a selection program was started in<br />
1966 covering the western part of the country. Similar<br />
selection studies were carried out in near last days by<br />
different resources (Kalyoncu and Þen, 1990; Bostan et<br />
al., 1995; Aslantaþ and Güleryüz, 1995; Karadeniz et.<br />
al., 1996).<br />
Aim of the study was to determine pomological<br />
characteristics of almonds grown in Malatya. Cultivation<br />
is usually extensive in this area most of trees are from<br />
seedlings. Vegetative propagation by budding or grafting<br />
on almond seedlings are insufficient in the area.<br />
Therefore, the present study was undertaken for the<br />
selection of superior types.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
This study was conducted in Malatya-Elazýð overland<br />
route. About 500 types were evaluated in the two<br />
years (1996-1997). Pomological characteristics of<br />
selected almond genotypes were examined for shell<br />
weight, kernel weight, kernel ratio, shell thickness, shell<br />
color, kernel color. After the investigations had been<br />
completed, 18 types were determined by some important<br />
quality characteristics as shown in Table 1 whereas<br />
fruit characteristics were evaluated based on the<br />
Weighted-Ranked Method (Karadeniz et al., 1996). The<br />
total point of each genotype was recorded with multiplication<br />
of these values. In addition, estimated age of<br />
trees and fruit maturity were determined. The measurements<br />
were realized on ten fruits randomly selected.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
At the end of the study, fruit characteristics were<br />
evaluated based on the Weighted–Ranked Method.<br />
Eighteen genotypes having a total of 360 points and<br />
were selected for general nut quality and higher.<br />
Important fruit traits of these promising genotypes were<br />
presented in Table 2, Weighted-Ranked Method scores<br />
were showed in Table 3.<br />
(1) Ph.D Turan Karadeniz, Assoc.Prof. - Karadeniz Technical University,<br />
Ordu Agricultural Faculty, Dept. Of Horticultural, Ordu-Turkey; (2) Ph.D<br />
Ahmet Kazankaya, Assist.Prof., Ph.D Tarýk Yarilgaç, Asist.Prof. - Yüzüncü<br />
Yýl University, Agricultural Faculty, Dept. Of Horticultural, Van-Turkey<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
T. Karadeniz et al.: DETERMINATION OF THE POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALMONDS...<br />
43<br />
Table 1. The scores of the characteristics and their relative values<br />
Tablica 1. Rezultati znaèajki i njihove relativne vrijednosti<br />
Nutshell weight of these types ranged between<br />
2.73 g and 10.74 g. The weight of nut in similar studies<br />
were between 3.00-6.10 g (Cangi and en, 1991),<br />
3.37-5.24 g (Kalyoncu and en, 1990), 2.89-6.14 g<br />
(Aslanta and Güleryüz, 1995), 3.43-5.86 g (Bostan et<br />
al., 1995), 1.99-4.32 g (Martins et.al., 2000).<br />
Kernel weight changed between 0.71 g and 1.40 g.<br />
According to the reported in similar study, these values<br />
evaluated between 0.60-1.40 g (Dokuzouz and Gülcan,<br />
1973), 0.68-1.20 g (Cangi and en, 1991), 0.64-1.00<br />
(Kalyoncu and en, 1990), 0.65-1.15 g (Aslanta and<br />
Güleryüz, 1995), 1.01-1.80 g (Karadeniz and Erman,<br />
1995), 0.45-1.20 g (Karadeniz et.al., 1995).<br />
In the examined, kernel ratio was between 11.17 %<br />
and 50.91 %. It is understood that from kernel ratio<br />
standpoint, these values are comparable to domestic<br />
and foreign literatures. These values in similar studies<br />
were between 17.80-28.20% (Dokuzouz and Gülcan,<br />
1973), 14.29-20.04% (Kalyoncu and en, 1990),<br />
14.61-24.28% (Bostan et.al., 1995), 14.20-22.76 %<br />
(Karadeniz et.al., 1995), 26.7-64.5% (Assaf, 2000). The<br />
results related to nut weight, kernel weight and kernel<br />
ratio of the present study are in agreement with the findings<br />
of previous reports.<br />
Shell thickness ranged between 3.5 mm and 8.1<br />
mm in the selected types and shell colour was between<br />
extremely light and intermediate. Kernel colour intensity<br />
was between light and dark.<br />
Almond trees and nuts in this study were shown in<br />
Photos 1-4.<br />
Photo 1. The old almond tree<br />
Foto 1. Staro stablo badema<br />
Photo 2. Almond nuts<br />
Foto 2. Plodovi badema<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
44<br />
T. Karadeniz et al.: DETERMINATION OF THE POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALMONDS...<br />
Photo 3. Almond trees in Malatya (Turkey)<br />
Foto 3. Stabla badema u Malatyai (Turska)<br />
Photo 4. Almond orchard growing in Malatya (Turkey)<br />
Foto 4. Voænjak badema u Malatyai (Turska)<br />
Table 2. Pomological characteristics of different almonds types grown in Malatya province (Turkey)<br />
Tablica 2. Pomološke znaèajke razlièitih tipova badema uzgojenih u provinciji Malatyai (Turska)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
T. Karadeniz et al.: DETERMINATION OF THE POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALMONDS...<br />
45<br />
Table 3. Weighted-Ranked Method scores taken of<br />
almond types<br />
Tablica 3. Rezultati dobiveni metodom vaganja za tipove<br />
badema<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
In the investigation the pomological characteristics<br />
of different types were determined and found very prospective<br />
from fruit characteristics standpoint. Almond<br />
selection studies in Malatya province was important<br />
since most of trees were grown from seedlings.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Anonymous (2002): Faostat Agriculture Database<br />
Collections.htm.<br />
2. Aslanta, R., Güleryüz, M. (1995): Selection study on<br />
native Almonds (Amygdalus communis L.) in Kemaliye<br />
District of Erzincan. Second National Agricultural<br />
Congress. Vol. I, 375-379, Adana.<br />
3. Assaf, R. (2000): Increasing Yields and Profitability of<br />
Almond Culture in Israel. Information Bulletin of the<br />
Research Network on Nuts (FAO-CIHEAM): Number: 9,<br />
pp.13-15.<br />
4. Bostan, S.Z., Cangi, R., Ouz, H.Ý. (1995): Research On<br />
Breeding By Selection of Wild Almond Types (Amygdalus<br />
communis L.) In Akdamar Island (Van Lake). Second<br />
National Agricultural Congress. Vol. I, 370-374, Adana.<br />
5. Cangi, R., en, S.M. (1991): The studies on Breeding<br />
Almond (P. amygdalus L.) by The Selection in<br />
Vezirköprü. Yüzüncü Yýl J. of Agric. Fac., 1(3):131-152.<br />
6. Dokuzouz, M., Gülcan, R. (1973): Researches on<br />
Selection and Adaptation of Almond (Amygdalus communis<br />
L.) in Aegean Region. TOAG, No: 22.<br />
7. Kalyoncu, Ý.H., en, S.M. (1990): The Determination by<br />
Selection of Almond Types (Amygdalus communis L.) in<br />
Apa Dam Lake (Konya). Ondokuzmayýs Univ. of Agric.<br />
Fac., M.S.Thesis, (In Turkish).<br />
8. Karadeniz, T., Balta, F., Cangi, R., Yarýlgaç, T. (1996):<br />
Selection Study on Native Almonds (Amygdalus communis<br />
L.) in Adýr Island (Van Lake)-I. Symposium on<br />
Hazelnut and Other Nuts. Ondokuzmayýs Univ. of Agric.<br />
Fac,. Symposium Book:338-343 (In Turkish).<br />
9. Karadeniz, T., Erman, P. (1996): The selection of Almond<br />
(Amygdalus communis L.) Grown in Siirt. Symposium<br />
on Hazelnut and Other Nuts. Ondokuzmayýs Univ. Agric.<br />
Fac, Symposium Book:324-331 (In Turkish).<br />
10. Kester, D.E., Asay, R. (1975): Almonds. Advances in<br />
Fruit Breeding. Purdue Univ. Press, West Lafayette,<br />
Indiana,387-419 p.<br />
11. Martins, A.N., Gomes, C., Ferreira, L. (2000): Almond<br />
Production and Characteristics in Algarve, Portugal.<br />
Information Bulletin of the Research Network on Nuts<br />
(FAO-CIHEAM): Number:9, pp.6-9.<br />
12. Özbek, S. (1978): Specific Fruit Growing. Çukurova<br />
Univ., J. of Agric. Fac., No:128, (In Turkish).<br />
ODREÐIVANJE POMOLOŠKIH ZNAÈAJKI BADEMA<br />
(Prunus amygdalus Batsh) U MALATYI (TURSKA)<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Istra`ivanje je obavljeno na 500 vrsta badema uzgojenih u Malatyai. Utvrðena je debljina ljuske od 2,73-10,74 g,<br />
te`ina ljuske 0,71-1,40 g, postotak jezgre 11,17-50,91%, debljina ljuske 3,5-8,1 mm, širina badema 12,0-28,6 mm,<br />
du`ina badema 18,2-48,2 mm i opseg badema od 7,1 do 20,3 mm.<br />
Kljuène rijeèi: Prunus amygdalus, almond, pomological, Malatya<br />
(Received on 11 October 2002; accepted on 27 March 2003 – Primljeno 11. listopada 2002.; prihvaæeno 27. o`ujka 2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 634.55.003(560)<br />
PROFITABILTY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION:<br />
A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
M.Yercan (1) , S. Engindeniz (2)<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Scientific review<br />
Pregledni znanstveni èlanak<br />
Dried fig production has a great important in the western part of Turkey in terms of<br />
foreign trade, farmers income and employment. In this paper, dried fig produced by farmers<br />
has been analyzed to determine production costs and profitability level. For this,<br />
selected farmers had been interviewed to find out return, structure of costs and profitability<br />
level. This is an opportunity to make comparison between products and countries.<br />
This is also information for decision makers for subsidizing policies. The production<br />
costs and the net profit of dried fig was found to be US $ 1,428/hectar and US $ 372/hectar,<br />
respectively. Dried fig production was found more profitable comparing with some<br />
other dried fruits. Dried fig producers spend a unit of money and earn 1.25 unit of money.<br />
Profitability of dried fig was found to be 125%. This is an indicator for the farmers willing<br />
to produce dried fig in their convenient conditions.<br />
Key-words: dried fruit, fig, profitability, economic analysis, cost, Turkey<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Agriculture is a primary sector in most developing<br />
countries. Although the importance of agriculture in<br />
these countries has relatively decreasing tendency. It is<br />
still important in the fredd labor market, national income,<br />
foreign trade and nutrition.<br />
Fig - a tropic and subtropic plant produced in all<br />
Mediterranean basin and countries has similar climate<br />
conditions like to USA, South America, Australia and<br />
South-west Asia. Annual average temperature must be<br />
within range of 18-20 C degree. And the temperature<br />
must not be less than -9 C degree. Fresh fruit must be<br />
dried under the sunshine up to 40 C degree. The artifical<br />
dried methods are not used.<br />
Turkey has a great share in the world dried fig production.<br />
Dried fig is an important export product for<br />
western part of Turkey. Turkey has 50% of total world<br />
production of dried fig. In 1998, 72% of total dried fig<br />
production (51 000 ton) was exported (ww.fao.org;<br />
www.tarim.gov.tr). Importing countries are Germany,<br />
France, Italy, Switzerland and England.The local consumption<br />
of this product is not so much common. The<br />
value of exports was US $ 77.2 million in 1998. Value<br />
of exported dried fig was 2.87 % in terms of total agricultural<br />
export in Turkey.<br />
Dried fig production is an essential production<br />
branch in some area of western part of Turkey. Izmir,<br />
being the selected province is the second largest area for<br />
producing fig in Turkey. Izmir has a great share of the fig<br />
production in Turkey. It has 15.67 % of total fig production<br />
in Turkey and 13.71% of total fig plantations as well.<br />
This paper argues how level of dried fig production<br />
is profitable in Turkey. This is important for the producers,<br />
exporters and policy makers whose product has a<br />
comparative advantages. Producers aim to get maximum<br />
profit. Economic factors effect producers in the<br />
decision making process as well as natural and politics<br />
factors in the area and the country. Relating with the<br />
many researches done for the subject of fig economics<br />
imply that decision making is regarding mostly the marketing<br />
conditions of product and the supply conditions<br />
of inputs (Aksoy and Anac, 1994; Ilgin and Küden,<br />
1997; Bülbül et al, 1998; Redonda, 2001).<br />
The purpose of this study was to provide a guide<br />
for dried fig growers to develop a budget identifies spe-<br />
(1) Ph.D Murat Yercan, Asist. Prof., University of Ege, Faculty of<br />
Agriculture, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, 35100 Bornova, Ýzmir,<br />
Turke,(2)Ph.D Sait Engindeniz - University of Ege, Faculty of Agriculture,<br />
Dept. of Agricultural Economics, 35100 Bornova, zmir, Turkey<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Yercan et al.: PROFITABILY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
47<br />
cific cost categories and estimating a net profit for the<br />
production and sale of dried figs in Turkey.<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />
Some economical aspects of dried fig production<br />
in Turkey and World were collected and compared from<br />
statistical reports in time periods. A case study consisted<br />
of surveyed data from fig producers in a selected<br />
area. This area was selected according to the production<br />
share in Izmir province. Three villages were selected<br />
from the province and data have been collected from<br />
52 producers by randomly sampling method. All the<br />
data surveyed from the producers were the data of<br />
2000. Selected producers were determined by the followed<br />
formula (Günes and Arikan, 1988):<br />
where<br />
n = The number of sample fig orchards =52<br />
S = Standard deviation= 16.297<br />
Z = 1.96<br />
N = Total number of fig orchards=312<br />
e = error term = 4,054<br />
The general cost items of dried fig production were<br />
classified as variable costs and fixed costs. The variable<br />
costs associated with crop production were all inputs<br />
that directly relate to the production and covered labor,<br />
machine costs, material costs (fertilizer, pesticide,<br />
wrapping, etc.) as well as transport costs. In this study,<br />
Variable costs were calculated by using current input<br />
and labor wages.<br />
Fixed costs are named as indirect costs, supplementary<br />
costs, i.e. The costs of production do not vary<br />
significantly with the volume of output. Fixed costs<br />
included interest of total variable costs, management<br />
costs, annual depreciation costs and land rent. Interest<br />
on total variable costs were calculated by charging a<br />
simple interest rate of 12 % (annual average nominal<br />
interest rate) on one-half of the total variable costs.<br />
Management costs were estimated to be 3 % of the total<br />
variable costs. Annual depreciation cost was estimated<br />
by using the straight-line method. Fig orchards are<br />
exempted from property tax and were not insured.<br />
In this study, total production costs were subtracted<br />
from gross income to calculate net profit.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Some Features of Fig Production<br />
In this study, total and sample fig orchards were<br />
determined to be 843.3 ha and 133.9 ha, respectively.<br />
Maximum, minimum, and average fig orchards were 5.5<br />
ha, 0.3 ha, and 2.6 ha (Table 1).<br />
The most convenient planting space in fig orchards<br />
was 6 x 8 m (Kabasakal, 1990). It is preferred 6 x 6 m<br />
in the condition of ordinary soil quality and 8x8 m in the<br />
condition of extra-ordinary soil quality. This is also<br />
depends on the condition of climate and capacity of soil.<br />
The planting space is changeable by the orchards, too. In<br />
this research, the planting space was between 6 x 6 m<br />
and 9 x 9 m. The most common and preferable planting<br />
space is 7 x 7 m in the researched orchards (Table 2).<br />
Establishment Costs<br />
Establishment costs are spreading through eight<br />
years in this production. The items of them were given<br />
in Table 3. Establishment costs cover all the expenses<br />
relating to the period of the trees having productive<br />
capacity. These are generally related to the labor and<br />
machines costs (maintenance, energy, etc.).<br />
Production Costs<br />
Production costs consist of both operating (variable)<br />
and fixed cost. Productivity years of fig has been<br />
accepted 35-40 years. The labor costs rate on dried fig<br />
Table 1. Some Statistical Characteristics of Total and Sample Fig Orchards<br />
Tablica 1. Neke statisti~ke zna~ajke vo}njaka smokava (ukupno i uzorak)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
48<br />
M. Yercan et al.: PROFITABILY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
Table 2. The distribution of orchards by planting space in researched land<br />
Tablica 2. Podjela voænjaka prema sklopu usjeva<br />
is extremely high (Table 4). Labor is used for harvestings,<br />
dreving and classification in this production<br />
branch (Altindisli and Ertem, 1998).<br />
Yields<br />
Yields of dried fig vary between 1,650 kg/hectar<br />
and 1,900 kg/hectar (Kabasakal, 1990). The average<br />
yield of dried fig was found 1,860 kg per hectar and 9<br />
kg per tree in researched area. Fig tree is fertile from 9 th<br />
to 35 th years (Graph 1). Yield of dried fig increases per<br />
year up to 15 th year. There is increase from 15 th to 30 th .<br />
After the 30 th year, yield decreases rapidly.<br />
Marketing and Pricing<br />
Dried fig is marketed by the Sales Cooperatives,<br />
Whole salers, Comissioners, Companies and retailers in<br />
Turkey (Olgun and Akgüngör, 1998). Sales cooperatives<br />
have 6-7% market share and 3-4% of total export in all<br />
Turkish economy. In the selected area, most of producers<br />
are members of sales cooperative (TARIS), thus<br />
generally, the most of products are marketed by this<br />
cooperative. TARIS is the first and biggest Union of<br />
Agricultural Cooperatives in Turkey. TARIS carries on its<br />
activities with Fig, Raisin, Cotton, Olive and olive-oil<br />
agricultural sales cooperatives in 65 locations in Aegean<br />
and Marmara Region and more than 127 900 producer<br />
members. Each product has separated agricultural sales<br />
cooperative union under the TARIS authority such as Fig<br />
Union, Sultana Raisins Union, Cotton Union, Olive and<br />
olive-oil Union. Thus, TARIS is so effective for pricing<br />
policy in the competitive market. Producer price of<br />
dried fig varied between US$ 0.6/kg and US$ 1.3/kg in<br />
research area.<br />
Gross Income and Net profit<br />
Gross income of fig orchards was shown in Table<br />
5. The gross income was US$ 1,860 per hectar and US<br />
$ 9 per tree. Gross income is expressed by the total product<br />
multiply the average price of dried fig.<br />
Gross income and costs were as shown in graph 2<br />
per year. Net profit was taken after 8 years. Maximum<br />
net profit has been realized between 15-30 year old<br />
trees.<br />
Net profit is calculated by deduction from the total<br />
gross income of all such costs within the production<br />
period. This value is the income of fix assets. Net profit<br />
was found US $ 372 /hectar and US $ 3/tree in examined<br />
fig orchards (Table 6).<br />
Table 3. Structure of costs of fig orchards (US $/hectar)<br />
Tablica 3. Struktura tro{kova vo}njaka smokava (US $ / ha)<br />
(*) Sapling, fertilizer, pesticide, etc. – Mladica, gnojivo, pesticid itd.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Yercan et al.: PROFITABILY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
49<br />
Table 4. Production costs of fig orchards<br />
Tablica 4. Tro{kovi proizvodnje voænjaka smokava<br />
(*) The economic life of fig plantations was estimated as 35 years – Gospodarski vijek planta`a smokve je 35 godina<br />
Comparative Results of Dried Fig<br />
Graph 1. Relations between age and yield<br />
Grafikon 1. Odnosi izmeðu dobi i prinosa<br />
Comparative results for dried fig were given to be<br />
compared with other dried fruits. The results of dried<br />
sultana and apricot were derived from other research<br />
papers. Comparative results were expressed by the profitability<br />
criteria. This is the measure of profit between<br />
two or more profit making alternatives. Profitability is a<br />
relative measure and must not be confused with profit,<br />
being an absolute measure. Profitability was expressed<br />
by the ratio of return (price of product) on total cost per<br />
kg of product. Dried fig is more profitable among the<br />
dried sultana and apricot. It means while farmers invest<br />
1 unit of capital for dried fig, they earn 1.25 unit of capital.<br />
However, earnings are 0.66 and 0.55 unit of money<br />
in dried sultana (Akgüngör, 1996) and apricot (Olgun et<br />
al., 2002).<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
In this paper, we presented explanatory information<br />
for the production economics of dried fig in Turkey. So,<br />
we presented the comparison opportunities for other<br />
countries. This is completely related to comparative<br />
advantages between the countries.<br />
Dried fig production seems more profitable among<br />
the some other dried fruits. Each product is strictly<br />
dependent on its own condition (soil, climate and<br />
others). Dried fig production is almost organic. Using of<br />
fertilizer and chemicals are extremely rare compared to<br />
sultanas and apricot. The variable costs are lower comparing<br />
with other dried fruits. So, this is positive effect<br />
for the dried fig. Also, fixed cost of sultanas and apricot<br />
is relatively higher than the fig, because of more valuable<br />
land comparing with fig orchard and land. Generally,<br />
fig is produced in the sloping land. This is the evaluation<br />
of one-year data analysis. Prices vary from year to<br />
year depending on some other variables. The total costs<br />
cover both direct and indirect costs. Farmer doesn’t<br />
care about the indirect costs such as depreciation, interest<br />
of total variable cost.<br />
According to this study, dried fig production may<br />
be more profitable. Farmers should gather all the eco-<br />
Table 5. Total gross income of fig orchards<br />
Tablica 5. Ukupan bruto prihod voænjaka smokava<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
50<br />
M. Yercan et al.: PROFITABILY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
Table 6. Net profit of fig orchards<br />
Tablica 6. Neto dobit od vo}njaka smokava<br />
Resource: derived from the survey – Izvor: Anketa<br />
nomic data they can have about the production and<br />
market conditions of dried fig. Although cost and return<br />
estimates are believed to be typical and realistic.<br />
Individual farmers should adjust values to represent<br />
their specific situation and circumstances.<br />
Graph 2. The changing of gross ýncome and costs<br />
per age in fig orchards<br />
Grafikon 2. Promjene ukupnog prihoda i tro{kova<br />
prema starosti voænjaka smokava<br />
9. Olgun, A. K.Peker and H.Adanacýoglu, 2002, Policies<br />
Directed to Apricot Production In Turkey, Fifth Turkish<br />
Agricultural Economisc Congress, Erzurum, Turkey, pp:<br />
242-250.<br />
10. Redonda, M., 2001, Economics and Marketing of Dried<br />
Fig, Second International Symposium on Fig ( May 7-<br />
10, 2001), Caceres, Spain<br />
(http:// www.iamz.chiam.org/caceres2001.htm).<br />
11. …… FAO Statistics. www.fao.org<br />
12. …… Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture<br />
(www.tarim.gov.tr)<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Altindisli, A., Ertem, A. (1998): Organic Fig Production in<br />
Turkey, ISHS Acta Horticulturae 480:227-232.<br />
2. Akgüngör, S. (1996): Yield, Costs and Marketing of<br />
Organic Dried Sultanas In Turkey: A Case Study of salihli<br />
and Kemalpaºa, Izmir, Turkey, 54 p.<br />
3. Aksoy, U., Anac, D. (1994): Factors Affecting Quality of<br />
Fresh and Dried Fig Fruits, ISHS Acta Horticulturea 368:<br />
763-766.<br />
4. Bülbül, S., Atil, H., Hepaksoy, S. (1998): A General<br />
Study of Commercial Dried Fig Production in the Big<br />
Meander Valley of Turkey, ISHS Acta Horticulturae 480<br />
:317-320.<br />
5. Günes, T., Arikan, R. (1988): The Statistic of Agricultural<br />
Economics, The University of Ankara, The Publication of<br />
Faculty of Agriculture, No. 1049, Ankara, 293 p.<br />
6. Ilgin, M., Küden, A.B. (1997): Table Fig Selection Study<br />
in the Kahramanmaras Province in Turkey, ISHS Acta<br />
Horticulturae 441: 351-358<br />
7. Kabasakal, A. (1990): The Planting of Fig, The<br />
Foundation of Development And Support of Agricultural<br />
Research, No:20, Yalova, Turkey, 35 p.<br />
8. Olgun, A., Akgüngör, S. (1998): Fig Production and<br />
Marketing Policies in Turkey With Special Emphasis on<br />
Alternative Marketing Possibilities, ISHS Acta<br />
Horticulturae 480:321-323.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
M. Yercan et al.: PROFITABILY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION: A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY<br />
51<br />
PROFITABILNOST PROIZVODNJE SUHIH<br />
SMOKAVA (PRIMJER U TURSKOJ)<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Proizvodnja suhih smokava zna~ajna je za zapadni dio Turske glede inozemne trgovine, prihoda farmera i zaposlenosti.<br />
U ovom radu govori se o suhim smokvama koje proizvode farmeri, a analizirane su kako bi se utvrdili tro{kovi<br />
proizvodnje i razina profitabilnosti. To je prilika za one koji donose odluke o politici poticaja. Tro{kovi proizvodnje i<br />
neto dobit od suhih smokava iznosi 1428/ha i 372/ha USD, slijedom. Utvr|eno je da je proizvodnja suhih smokava<br />
profitabilnija u usporedbi s nekim drugim suhim vo}em. Proizvo|a~i suhih smokava potro{e jedinicu novca, a zarade<br />
1,25 jedinica. Procijenjeno je da dobit od suhih smokava iznosi 125%. To je pokazatelj farmerima koji `ele proizvoditi<br />
suhe smokve u svojim uvjetima.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: su{eno vo}e, smokva, profitabilnost, ekonomska analiza, tro{kovi, Turska<br />
(Received on 19 December 2002; accepted on 21 March 2003 – Primljeno 19. prosinca 2002.; prihvaæeno 21. o`ujka<br />
2003.)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 637.12.04/.07(497.5)<br />
NOVI NA^IN VREDNOVANJA KRAVLJEG MLIJEKA U<br />
REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ<br />
P. Miji}, I. Kne`evi}<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Stru~ni ~lanak<br />
Professional paper<br />
Va`nost govedarske proizvodnje u ukupnoj vrijednosti sto~arske i poljoprivredne proizvodnje<br />
vrlo je velika. Mo`e se s pravom re}i da je govedarstvo “generator” sto~arstva,<br />
odnosno cjelokupne poljoprivrede. Stavljanjem naglaska na kvalitetu proizvoda, razvijene<br />
govedarske zemlje, kao i zemlje ~lanice EU uvele su nove pravilnike kontrole i vrednovanja<br />
mlijeka i mlije~nih proizvoda. Broj somatskih stanica, broj mikroorganizama i<br />
fizikalno-kemijski parametri postali su vrlo bitni elementi u valorizaciji i klasifikaciji mlijeka.<br />
Republika Hrvatska tako|er je usvojila novi “Pravilnik o kakvo}i svje`eg sirovog<br />
mlijeka” i “Uredbu o ciljnoj cijeni svje`eg sirovog mlijeka”. Zbog {irokog spektra parametara<br />
koji se kontroliraju i pla}aju prema Pravilniku i Uredbi, svaka pogre{ka i nepravovremena<br />
reakcija proizvo|a~a ili veterinara u zdravstvenoj za{titi tijekom laktacijskog<br />
ciklusa odrazit }e se i na krajnje financijsko poslovanje. Struka treba {to prije zapo~eti<br />
s kori{tenjem doma}ih i svjetskih znanstvenih spoznaja u sto~arstvu, pri ~emu }e zdravlje<br />
`ivotinje i kvaliteta mlijeka imati prioritetno mjesto.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: proizvodnja mlijeka, pravilnik, somatske stanice, fizikalno-kemijski parametri<br />
UVOD<br />
Va`nost govedarske proizvodnje je velika i u okviru<br />
sto~arske i u okviru ukupne poljoprivredne proizvodnje.<br />
Govedarska proizvodnja u RH temelj je razvoja ukupne<br />
sto~arske proizvodnje u kojoj sudjeluje s oko 40%. Na<br />
primjeru Njema~ke ta je va`nost jo{ izra`enija, jer govedarska<br />
proizvodnja participira s 45% u vrijednosti ukupne<br />
poljoprivredne proizvodnje (Uremovi} i sur., 2002.).<br />
Zato mo`emo s pravom re}i da je govedarstvo «generator»<br />
sto~arske, odnosno cjelokupne poljoprivredne<br />
proizvodnje.<br />
Proizvodnja mlijeka najzahtjevnija je proizvodnja u<br />
govedarstvu, za koju je potrebno ostvariti niz preduvjeta<br />
(kvalitetno stado, osmi{ljene i efikasne objekte, dovoljno<br />
obradive povr{ine i sl.). Proizvo|a~i mlijeka do sada<br />
nisu imali problema s plasmanom mlijeka. Razlog je u<br />
nedostatnosti proizvedenog mlijeka. Postavlja se pitanje<br />
kolike su godi{nje potrebe RH za svje`im mlijekom,<br />
odnosno koliki je biolo{ki prag zasi}enja? Prema navodima<br />
(Caput, 1998.), biolo{ki prag zasi}enja mlijekom u<br />
Hrvatskoj je oko 250 litara. Kada tu koli~inu mlijeka<br />
pomno`imo s ukupnim brojem stanovnika, proizlazi da<br />
su aktualne potrebe Hrvatske oko 1,2 milijarde litara mlijeka.<br />
U svjetskim razmjerima kravlje mlijeko predstavlja<br />
oko 91% ukupnog mlijeka, {to zna~i da su potrebe za<br />
sirovim kravljim mlijekom u RH oko 1 milijardu litara.<br />
Prema slu`benim podacima za 2001. godinu, u<br />
Hrvatskoj je proizvedeno oko 634 milijuna litara kravljeg<br />
mlijeka (Statisti~ki ljetopis RH, 2002.), {to na temelju<br />
prethodnog izra~una navodi na zaklju~ak da se u RH ne<br />
proizvodi dovoljna koli~ina mlijeka.<br />
NORMATIVI PRIHVA]ENI PRAVILNIKOM<br />
Mlijeko i mlije~ni proizvodi svakodnevna su hrana<br />
ljudi i njihova kontinuirana proizvodnja predstavlja jedan<br />
od strate{kih zadataka za svaku zemlju. Zahtjevi kupaca<br />
i njihov pa`ljivi odabir, u prvi plan su stavili naglasak na<br />
kvalitetu mlijeka. Iz toga razloga, razvijene govedarske<br />
zemlje, kao i zemlje ~lanice EU, uvele su nove pravilnike<br />
kontrole i vrednovanja mlijeka i mlije~nih proizvoda.<br />
Kontrolira se cjelokupna proizvodnja mlijeka: od kontrole<br />
broja somatskih stanica i broja mikroorganizama u<br />
Mr.sc. Pero Miji}, asistent i dr.sc. Ivan Kne`evi}, red.prof. – Sveu~ili{te<br />
Josipa Jurja Strossmayera, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Zavod za<br />
zootehniku, Trg sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
P. Mijiæ i sur.: NOVI NAÈIN VREDNOVANJA KRAVLJEG MLIJEKA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ<br />
53<br />
Tablica 1. Minimalni kriteriji za kakvo}u svje`eg kravljeg mlijeka u Republici Hrvatskoj prema Pravilniku (Izvor:<br />
Narodne novine, 102/2000.)<br />
Table 1. Minimal criterions for quality of fresh cow milk in Republic of Croatia by Book of regulations (Source:<br />
Narodne novine, 102/2000)<br />
mlijeku neposredno pri samoj mu`nji, zatim prerada u<br />
mljekari, pa do skladi{tenja i prodaje u trgovini.<br />
Me|unarodno priznati parametar za ocjenu<br />
zdravstvenog stanja vimena krava je broj somatskih stanica<br />
u mlijeku. Prema zakonskim propisima donesenim<br />
1995. godine, u zemljama EU sirovo mlijeko krava ne<br />
smije sadr`avati vi{e od 400.000 somatskih stanica/ml<br />
(Sarrazin i Scotti, 1995.). Sli~no pravilniku koji je va`e}i<br />
u zemljama EU i Ministarstvo poljoprivrede i {umarstva<br />
RH 2000. godine usvojilo je novi “Pravilnik o kakvo}i<br />
svje`eg sirovog mlijeka” (Narodne novine, 102/2000.).<br />
Pravilnikom su navedeni sljede}i parametri koji }e se<br />
pratiti: mlije~na mast, mlije~ne bjelan~evine, suha tvar<br />
bez masti, gusto}a, kiselost, to~ka ledi{ta, alkoholna<br />
proba sa 72% etil alkoholom te prisustvo inhibitornih<br />
tvari. Nakon uspostave rada Sredi{njeg dr`avnog laboratorija<br />
u Kri`evcima, koncem 2002. godine usvojena je<br />
“Uredba o ciljnoj cijeni svje`eg sirovog mlijeka”<br />
(Narodne novine, 156/2002.). Uredbom je utvr|eno mlijeko<br />
standardne kvalitete, kao i cijena pojedinih kemijskih<br />
parametara mlijeka. Pod mlijekom standardne kvalitete<br />
prema Uredbi smatra se ono koje ima najmanje<br />
3,7% mlije~ne masti, 3,2% bjelan~evina, do 100.000<br />
mikroorganizama/ml i do 400.000 somatskih stanica/ml.<br />
Obra~un pla}anja mlijeka proizvo|a~ima prema<br />
Pravilniku i Uredbi primjenjuje se od 1. sije~nja 2003.<br />
godine i prili~no je kompliciran. Temelji se na vrijednosti<br />
mlije~nih bjelan~evina i mlije~ne masti (omjer 55% :<br />
45%), a zatim na klasifikaciji mlijeka prema broju<br />
somatskih stanica i broju mikroorganizama u mlijeku. U<br />
Tablicama 1. i 2. prikazani su parametri koji su prihva}eni<br />
Pravilnikom te klasifikacija mlijeka prema Uredbi<br />
temeljena na broju mikroorganizama/ml i broju somatskih<br />
stanica/ml mlijeka.<br />
Prema prvim slu`benim izvje{}ima iz Sredi{njeg<br />
laboratorija u Kri`evcima (Kuterovac i sur., 2002.),<br />
najve}i problem za proizvo|a~e predstavlja veliki broj<br />
mikroorganizama i somatskih stanica u mlijeku. Ostali<br />
parametri (kemijsko-fizikalni pokazatelji) ve}im dijelom<br />
ispunjavaju minimalne uvjete.<br />
Po~etni rezultati analize mlijeka i nisu iznena|uju}i,<br />
jer su istra`ivanja koja su do sada bila provedena na<br />
mlije~nim govedarskim farmama i obiteljskim gospodarstvima<br />
u Hrvatskoj upu}ivala na pove}ani broj somatskih<br />
stanica u mlijeku (Kalit i Luka~-Havranek, 1998.;<br />
Miji} i sur., 2001.). Tako|er i zemlje EU u po~etku primjene<br />
sli~nog pravilnika imale su problema s pove}anim<br />
brojem somatskih stanica u mlijeku. Prema istra`ivanjima<br />
(Emanuelson i Funke, 1991.) u [vedskoj je utvr|eno<br />
26,7% mastiti~nog mlijeka, dok su u Njema~koj (Roth i<br />
sur., 1998.) ustanovili u 45% istra`ivanih krava patogene<br />
mikroorganizme u najmanje jednoj ~etvrti vimena. Ti<br />
rezultati pokazuju da je problem velikog broja somatskih<br />
stanica i mikroorganizama velik i zato je potreban dugotrajan<br />
rad te kori{tenje svih mogu}nosti u pobolj{anju<br />
zdravlja vimena: od selekcijskih do veterinarskih.<br />
Tablica 2. Klasifikacija svje`eg kravljeg mlijeka u RH prema broju mikroorganizama i broju somatskih stanica mlijeka<br />
(Izvor: Narodne novine, 156/2002.)<br />
Table 2. The fresh cow’s milk classification in the Republic of Croatia according to the number of microorganisms and<br />
somatic cells (Source: Narodne novine, 156/2002)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
54<br />
P. Mijiæ i sur.: NOVI NAÈIN VREDNOVANJA KRAVLJEG MLIJEKA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ<br />
Mastiti~no mlijeko, pored financijskih gubitaka koje<br />
nanosi proizvo|a~u mlijeka, tako|er uzrokuje zna~ajne<br />
gubitke i prera|iva~u mlijeka. Prema literaturnim navodima<br />
(Antunac i sur., 1997.), mlijeko s velikim brojem<br />
somatskih stanica najve}e gubitke nanosi industriji<br />
proizvodnje sira, a gubici se o~ituju u nepovoljnim<br />
odnosima kazeinskih frakcija, pove}anju pH vrijednosti,<br />
promjeni koagulacijskih osobina, smanjenju randmana i<br />
kvalitete gotovog proizvoda. Zato je za proizvodnju<br />
zdravstveno ispravnih mlije~nih proizvoda, od posebne<br />
va`nosti ~isto}a ruku muza~a, vimena krave, prostora<br />
za mu`nju i ostalog mljekarskog pribora, zatim tehni~ka<br />
ispravnost muzne opreme, obavezno lije~enje oboljelih<br />
`ivotinja, odnosno potrebna je dosljedna edukaciju<br />
proizvo|a~a (Pavi~i} i Ha|ina, 2001.).<br />
Zbog nepovoljnih gospodarskih prilika zadnjih<br />
desetak godina i neadekvatnih tehnolo{ko-tehni~kih<br />
postupaka na mnogim mlije~nim farmama u Hrvatskoj<br />
tijekom pretvorbe poljoprivrednih kombinata u poljoprivredna<br />
poduze}a, proizvodnja mlijeka nije se zna~ajnije<br />
pove}ala. Samim tim do{lo je i do odre|ene stagnacije<br />
u kvaliteti mlijeka. Me|utim, proizvodnja kvalitetnog mlijeka<br />
zbog nedostatnosti u Republici Hrvatskoj imat }e<br />
brzi razvoj, ali samo uz uvjet da se proizvo|a~i prilagode<br />
novim standardima kvalitete mlijeka.<br />
ZAKLJU^AK<br />
Proizvo|a~i }e trebati posvetiti vi{e vremena<br />
tehni~kim fazama proizvodnje mlijeka, pravilnoj hranidbi<br />
i zdravstvenoj za{titi. Zbog {irokog spektra parametara<br />
koji se mjere i kontroliraju po novom Pravilniku, svaka<br />
pogre{ka i nepravovremena reakcija proizvo|a~a ili<br />
veterinara u zdravstvenoj za{titi tijekom laktacijskog<br />
ciklusa, odrazit }e se i na krajnje financijsko poslovanje.<br />
Nu`no je da se u Hrvatskoj {to prije izradi programe<br />
razvoja govedarstva na temelju zahtjeva tr`i{ta i<br />
suvremenih marketin{kih ciljeva, koriste}i vlastita i<br />
svjetska znanstvena dostignu}a u sto~arstvu, pri ~emu<br />
}e zdravlje `ivotinje i kvaliteta mlijeka imati va`no mjesto.<br />
5. Kuterovac, K., Daki}, A., Dra`i}, M. (2002.): Prvi<br />
izvje{taj o kvaliteti mlijeka u RH kontroliranog u HSSC-<br />
Sredi{njem laboratoriju za kontrolu mlijeka. 35. Hrvatski<br />
simpozij mljekarskih stru~njaka s me|unarodnim sudjelovanjem,<br />
Lovran, 13.-15. studeni, Zbornik sa`etaka.,<br />
str. 24.-26.<br />
6. Miji}, P., Kne`evi}, I., Rimac, D., Doma}inovi}, M.,<br />
Kralik, D., Baban, Mirjana, Bagari}, D. (2001.):<br />
Usporedba parametara mlijeka s novim pravilnikom o<br />
kakavo}i svje`eg sirovog mlijeka. Poljoprivreda,<br />
77(2):33.-38.<br />
7. Pavi~i}, @., Ha|ina, S. (2001.): Zna~enje primijenjene<br />
dezinfekcije u higijenskoj kakvo}i mlijeka. Sto~arstvo,<br />
55(4):269.-280.<br />
8. Roth, S., Reinsch, N., Nieland, G., Schallenberger, E.<br />
(1998.): Untersuchungen über Zusammenhänge zwischen<br />
Eutergesundheit, Melkbarkeitsparametern und<br />
Milchflußkurven an einer Hochleistungsrinderherde.<br />
Züchtungskunde, 70(4):242.-260.<br />
9. Sarrazin, P., Scotti, O. (1995): Raw milk and Europe.<br />
Dairy Science Abstracts, 75(4):2091.<br />
10. Uremovi}, Z., Uremovi}, M., Pavi}, V., Mio~, B., Mu`ic,<br />
S., Janje~i}, Z. (2002.): Sto~arstvo. Ud`benik, 91.<br />
Agronomski <strong>fakultet</strong> u Zagrebu.<br />
11. ……… Pravilnik o kakvo}i svje`eg sirovog mlijeka.<br />
Narodne novine, 102/2000. od 17. listopada 2000.<br />
12. ……… Statisti~ki ljetopis Republike Hrvatske (2002).<br />
Dr`avni zavod za statistiku, 259. Zagreb.<br />
13. ……… Uredba o ciljnoj cijeni svje`eg sirovog mlijeka.<br />
Narodne novine, 156/2002. od 24. prosinca 2002.<br />
LITERATURA<br />
1. Antunac, N., Luka~-Havranek J., Samar`ija, D. (1998.):<br />
Somatske stanice i njihov utjecaj na kakvo}u i preradu<br />
mlijeka. Mljekarstvo, 47(3):183.-193.<br />
2. Caput, P. (1998.): Aktualnosti u proizvodnji i plasmanu<br />
svje`eg kravljeg mlijeka u Hrvatskoj. Sto~arstvo,<br />
52(5):379-385.<br />
3. Emanuelson, U., Funke, H. (1991): Effect of milk yield<br />
on relationship between bulk milk somatic cell count and<br />
prevalence of mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science,<br />
74:2479-2483.<br />
4. Kalit, S., Luka~-Havranek, Jasmina (1998): Current status<br />
of somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk from individual<br />
farms in Croatia. Milchwissenschaft, 53(4):183-<br />
184.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
P. Mijiæ i sur.: NOVI NAÈIN VREDNOVANJA KRAVLJEG MLIJEKA U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ<br />
55<br />
NEW WAY OF EVALUATING COW MILK<br />
IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA<br />
SUMMARY<br />
It can be rightfally said that cow breeding is the «generator» of livestock and therefore of the hole agronomy.<br />
Stressing the quality of the product developed countries as well as the EU countries have introduced the new control<br />
regulations and evaluations of milk and dairy products. The number of somatic cells, microorganisms, protein<br />
and milk fat contents have become very important elements in valorisation and classification of milk. The Republic<br />
of Croatia also has the «New standard of the Quality of Fresh and Raw Milk» and the «Regulation of the Target Price<br />
of Fresh Raw Milk». Due to the wide spectre of the parameters controlled and paid by the new Standards and<br />
Regulations, every error and inadequate reaction of the manufacturer or the veterinarian during the health protection<br />
over the lactation cycle will have a reflection on a financial aspect of the business. The branch should start as<br />
earlier as possible using the domestic and international knowledge about livestock thereby animal health and better<br />
quality of milk will be in the priority.<br />
Key-words: milk production, standard, somatic cells, physical and chemical parameters<br />
(Primljeno 7. o`ujka 2003.; prihva}eno 10. travnja 2003. - Received on 7 March 2003; accepted on 10 April 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
TOVNOST I MESNATOST SVINJA NEKIH<br />
DVOPASMINSKIH KRI@ANACA<br />
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 636.033:636.4<br />
\. Sen~i} (1) Marcela [peranda (1) , Z. Antunovi} (1) , T. [peranda (2) Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
Sa`etak<br />
Istra`ivanje tovnih i klaoni~kih svojstava provedeno je na kri`ancima izme|u {vedskog<br />
landrasa i velikog jork{ira ([L x VJ), {vedskog landrasa i pietrena ([L x P) te velikog<br />
jork{ira i pietrena (VJ X P). Svinje su tovljene u istim uvjetima. Hranjene krmnom smjesom<br />
s 15,36% sirovih proteina i 13,22 MJ ME/kg. Vrijednost pH mesa odre|ena je pHmetrom<br />
Mettler Toledo, sposobnost vezanja vode mesa prema Grau-Hammu (1952.), a<br />
boja i mramoriranost mesa prema ameri~koj NPCC-metodi. Izme|u istra`ivanih genotipova<br />
svinja nije bilo statisti~ki zna~ajnih razlika (P>0,05) u veli~ini dnevnih prirasta<br />
(640 g, 680 g i 680 g), ali su utvr|ene razlike u konverziji hrane. Najmanji utro{ak hrane<br />
za kilogram prirasta imali su kri`anci VJ x P (2,04 kg), a zatim kri`anci [L x VJ (3,22 kg)<br />
i kri`anci [L x P (3,63). Najve}u mesnatost polovica (55,15%) i najbolju konformaciju<br />
polovica imali su kri`anci VJ x P, a zatim prema mesnatosti sljede kri`anci [L x VJ<br />
(54,71%) i kri`anci [L x P (54,08%). Kvaliteta mesa svinja istra`ivanih genotipova bila<br />
je zadovoljavaju}a. Kri`anci s pietrenom ([L x P i VJ x P) imali su ne{to slabiju sposobnost<br />
vezanja vode mesa (9,70 cm 2 i 9,80 cm 2 ) u odnosu na kri`ance VJ x [L (8,51 cm 2 ).<br />
Kri`anci s pietrenom tako|er su imali slabiji intenzitet boje mesa (2,50 i 2,33) i slabiju<br />
mramoriranost mesa (1,38 i 1,50) u odnosu na intenzitet boje i mramoriranost mesa<br />
kri`anaca VJ x [L (2,75 i 2,50).<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: svinje, kri`anci, tovna svojstva, klaoni~ka svojstva<br />
Uvod<br />
Genotip svinja, uz hranidbu, najvi{e utje~e na njihovu<br />
tovnost i mesnatost. Kri`anjem svinja nastoji se<br />
posti}i heterozis u~inak za va`na proizvodna svojstva.<br />
Iznala`enje najboljih kombinacija kri`anja je neprekidan<br />
proces, s obzirom na to da se selekcijom frekvencija<br />
pojedinih gena neprekidno mijenja.<br />
U ranijim istra`ivanjima (Pellois i Runavot, 1991.;<br />
Demo i sur., 1994.; Sen~i} i sur., 2000.a i b; Sen~i} i<br />
sur., 2002.), ukazano je na obilje`ja svinja tropasminskih<br />
kri`anaca s njema~kim landrasom ili pietrenom kao<br />
terminalnim pasminama. U ovom istra`ivanju ukazuje<br />
se na neka tovna i klaoni~ka svojstva svinja dvopasminskih<br />
kri`anaca.<br />
Materijal i metode<br />
Istra`ivanje je provedeno s kri`ancima {vedskog<br />
ladrasa i velikog jork{ira (n=21), s kri`ancima {vedskog<br />
landrasa i pietrena (n=16) te s kri`ancima velikog<br />
jork{ira i pietrena (n=27), na farmi «Caritas», kod<br />
Osijeka. Skupine svinja bile su ujedna~ene prema omjeru<br />
spolova.<br />
Svinje su tovljene istovremeno i u istim uvjetima,<br />
tijekom prolje}a i ljeta. Hranjene su ad libitum, krmnom<br />
smjesom s 15,36% sir. bjelan~evina i 13,22 MJ ME/kg<br />
tijekom cijelog tova.<br />
Na liniji klanja utvr|ena je masa toplih polovica i<br />
njihova mesnatost prema Pravilniku (1999.) uz pomo}<br />
metode «dvije to~ke». Nakon 24 sata hla|enja polovica<br />
na +4 0 C, odre|en je udjel (%) najvrijednijih dijelova<br />
(but, le|a i ple}ka) u desnim svinjskim polovicama,<br />
prema metodi Wenigera i sur. (1963.).<br />
(1) Prof.dr.sc. \uro Sen~i}, mr.sc. Marcela [peranda i doc.dr.sc. Zvonko<br />
Antunovi} – Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u <strong>Osijeku</strong>,<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Trg sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek, (2)<br />
Mr.sc. Tomislav [peranda – Farmacija d.d., Vinkova~ka cesta b.b.,<br />
31000 Osijek<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
Ð. Senèiæ i sur.: TOVNOST I MESNATOST SVINJA NEKIH DVOPASMINSKIH KRI@ANACA<br />
57<br />
Vrijednost pH 1<br />
mesa odre|ena je 45 minuta post<br />
mortem, kontaktnim pH-metrom Mettler Toledo, a vrijednost<br />
pH 2<br />
mesa, 24 sata post mortem, nakon<br />
hla|enja mesa na +4 0 C. Kvaliteta mesa odre|ivana je<br />
na uzorku dugog le|nog mi{i}a (MLD) uzetom u visini<br />
izme|u 13 i 14 rebra. Sposobnost vezanja vode mesa<br />
odre|ena je prema Grau-Hammu (1952.), a boja i mramoriranost<br />
prema ameri~koj NPPC-metodi. Statisti~ka<br />
obrada rezultata istra`ivanja bila je pomo}u kompjutorskog<br />
programa Stat Soft, Inc. (2001.).<br />
Rezultati i rasprava<br />
Tovna svojstva kri`anaca vidljiva su iz Tablice 1.<br />
Izme|u prosje~nih po~etnih, kao i zavr{nih tjelesnih<br />
masa svinja pojedinih kri`anaca, nisu utvr|ene statisti~ki<br />
zna~ajne razlike (P>0,05).<br />
S tim u vezi, nisu utvr|ene niti razlike u dnevnim<br />
prirastima izme|u pojedinih genotipova svinja, u pojedinim<br />
razdobljima tova.<br />
Utro{ak hrane za kilogram prirasta bio je najmanji<br />
(2,04 kg) kod kri`anaca s najve}om mesnato{}u, tj. kod<br />
onih izme|u velikog jork{ira i pietrena, a najve}i (3,63<br />
kg) kod kri`anca s najni`om mesnato{}u, tj. onih<br />
izme|u {vedskog landrasa i pietrena.<br />
Klaoni~ka svojstva svinja, vidljiva su iz Tablice 2.<br />
Ujedna~enost masa toplih polovica omogu}ila je<br />
pravilno uspore|ivanje klaoni~kih svojstava svinja<br />
izme|u genotipova. Najve}u mesnatost polovica<br />
(55,15%) imali su kri`anci izme|u velikog jork{ira i pietrena.<br />
Taj genotip svinja imao je i najve}i udjel buta<br />
(31,95%) u polovicama. Obje skupine kri`anaca s pietrenom<br />
imale su ve}i udjel butova, a manji udjel ple}ki u<br />
polovicama u odnosu na kri`ance izme|u {vedskog landrasa<br />
i velikog jork{ira. Kri`anje s pietrenom povoljno je<br />
djelovalo na konformaciju svinjskih polovica, tj. na<br />
zastupljenost komercijalno vrjednijih dijelova. Na navedenu<br />
pojavu ukazuju istra`ivanja i drugih autora (@ivkovi}<br />
i sur., 1992., Demo i sur., 1994.)<br />
Kvaliteta mesa svinja istra`ivanih kri`anaca<br />
(Tablica 2.), bila je u prosjeku zadovoljavaju}a.<br />
Vrijednosti pH 1<br />
i pH 2<br />
mesa kretale su se u prosjeku u<br />
optimalnim granicama, iako je po~etni pH mesa, kod<br />
svinja s najve}om mesnato{}u (VJ x P), bio najni`i<br />
(6,19), ali ne i statisti~ki zna~ajno (P>0,05). Kri`anci<br />
izme|u velikog jork{ira i {vedskog landrasa imali su<br />
meso s boljom sposobno{}u vezanja vode (8,51 cm 2 )<br />
u odnosu na kri`ance s pietrenom (9,70 cm 2 i 9,80<br />
cm 2 ).<br />
Najja~i intenzitet boje (2,75) imalo je meso<br />
kri`anaca izme|u velikog jork{ira i {vedskog landrasa, a<br />
njamanji intenzitet boje (2,33), meso kri`anaca izme|u<br />
velikog jork{ira i pietrena, tj. najmesnatijeg genotipa.<br />
Granica pH 1<br />
vrijednosti za utvr|ivanje blijedog, mekanog<br />
i vodnjikavog (BMV) mesa je prema Hoffmanu<br />
Tablica 1. Tovna svojstva svinja nekih dvopasminskih kri`anaca<br />
Table 1. Fattening traits in pigs of some two crossbreeds<br />
# VJ-veliki jork{ir (LW-Large White); [L-{vedski landras (SL- Swedish Landrace); P-pietren (P-Pietrain)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
58<br />
Ð. Senèiæ i sur.: TOVNOST I MESNATOST SVINJA NEKIH DVOPASMINSKIH KRI@ANACA<br />
TABLICA 2. KLAONI~KA SVOJSTVA SVINJA NEKIH DVOPASMINSKIH KRI`ANACA<br />
Table 2. Slaughter traits in pigs of some two crossbreeds<br />
# VJ-veliki jork{ir (LW-Large White); [L-{vedski landras (SL- Swedish Landrace); P-pietren (P- Pietrain)<br />
(1994.) 6,0, a prema Kallweitu (1980.) ispod 5,8. Ako<br />
se uzme pH 2<br />
vrijednost kao kriterij za odre|ivanje BMVmesa,<br />
tada je granica, prema Forrestu (1998.) 5,5, a<br />
prema Kallweitu (1980.) je 5,4.<br />
Kri`anci s pietrenom imali su i slabiju pro`etost<br />
mesa masno}om (mramoriranost) u odnosu na<br />
kri`ance izme|u velikog jork{ira i {vedskog landrasa.<br />
I drugi su autori (Pellois i Runavot, 1991.; @ivkovi}<br />
i sur., 1992.; Wasmuth i Glodek, 1992.; Sen~i} i sur.,<br />
2000.a i b; 2002.) utvrdili da pietren u kri`anju mo`e<br />
pogor{ati kvalitetu mesa svinja kri`anaca.<br />
Zaklju~ak<br />
Na temelju istra`ivanja tovnih i klaoni~kih svojstava<br />
dvopasminskih kri`anaca izme|u {vedskog landrasa i<br />
velikog jork{ira ([L x VJ), {vedskog landrasa i pietrena<br />
([L x P) te velikog jork{ira i pietrena (VJ X P) utvr|eno je:<br />
- izme|u istra`ivanih genotipova svinja nije bilo<br />
statisti~ki zna~ajnih razlika (P>0,05) u veli~ini dnevnih<br />
prirasta (640 g, 680 g i 680 g), ali su utvr|ene razlike u<br />
konverziji hrane. Najmanji utro{ak hrane za kilogram prirasta<br />
imali su kri`anci VJ x P (2,04 kg), a zatim kri`anci<br />
[L x VJ (3,22 kg) i kri`anci [L x P (3,63),<br />
- najve}u mesnatost polovica (55,15%) i najbolju<br />
konformaciju polovica imali su kri`anci VJ x P, a zatim<br />
prema mesnatosti sljede kri`anci [L x VJ (54,71%) i<br />
kri`anci [L x P (54,08%),<br />
- kvaliteta mesa svinja istra`ivanih genotipova bila<br />
je zadovoljavaju}a. Kri`anci s pietrenom ([L x P i VJ x<br />
P) imali su ne{to slabiju sposobnost vezanja vode mesa<br />
(9,70 cm 2 i 9,80 cm 2 ) u odnosu na kri`ance VJ x [L<br />
(8,51 cm 2 ). Kri`anci s pietrenom tako|er su imali slabiji<br />
intenzitet boje mesa (2,50 i 2,33) i slabiju mramoriranost<br />
mesa (1,38 i 1,50) u odnosu na intenzitet boje i<br />
mramoriranost mesa kri`anaca VJ x [L (2,75 i 2,50).<br />
Literatura<br />
1. Demo, P, Poltarsky, J., Rehak, A. (1994): Use of the<br />
Pietrain breed for production of terminal slaughter<br />
hybrid. Zivocisna Vyroba, 39: 865-879.<br />
2. Forrest, I.C. (1998): Line speed implementation of<br />
various pork quality measures. Record of Proceedings,<br />
NSIF Conference and Animal Meeting. December 4-5,<br />
1998, Vol. 23, East Lansing Marriot, Michigan.<br />
3. Grau, R., Hamm, R. (1952.): Eine einfache Methode zur<br />
Bestimmung der Wasser bildung in Fleisch. Die<br />
Fleischwirtschaft, 4:295.-297.<br />
4. Hoffman, K. (1994): What is quality? Definition, measurement<br />
and eculation of meat quality. Meat Focus<br />
International, 3, 2, February, 1994.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
Ð. Senèiæ i sur.: TOVNOST I MESNATOST SVINJA NEKIH DVOPASMINSKIH KRI@ANACA<br />
59<br />
5. Kallweit, E. (1980.): Fleischfülle und Fleischbeschaffenheit.<br />
Schweinezucht und Schweinemast, 28(5):148.-<br />
155.<br />
6. Pellois, H., Runavot, J.P. (1991): Comparaison des performances<br />
d’ engraissement de carcasse et de qualite<br />
de riande de 4 types de porcs ayant une proportion<br />
variable de sang Pietrain. In 23 mes Journees de la<br />
Recherche Porcine en France, Paris, 1991, pp. 23.<br />
7. Sen~i}, \., Fazeka{, J., Maltar Z., Antunovi}, Z., Knapi},<br />
A. (2000.a): Obilje`ja mesnatosti svinja kri`anaca s pietrenom.<br />
Sto~arstvo, 54:175.-182.<br />
8. Sen~i}, \. Kralik G., Ku{ec, G., Margeta, V. (2000 b):<br />
Slaughtering quality of crossed pigs with German<br />
Landrace and Pietrain as terminal breeds. Agriculture,<br />
6:157-159.<br />
9. Sen~i}, \., Antunovi}, Z., [peranda Marcela (2002):<br />
Meatiness and meat quality in pigs crossed with pietrain.<br />
Sto~arstvo, 56:191-196.<br />
10. Wassmuth, R., Glodek, P. (1992): Einfluß des<br />
«Hampshirefaktors» und der Standzeit auf das glykolitische<br />
Potential und die Fleischbeschaffenheit bei<br />
Schweinen. Fleichwirtschaft, 72: 1299.-1302.<br />
11. Weniger, H., I., Steinhauf, D. und Pahl, G. (1963):<br />
Topography of Carcasses. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft,<br />
München.<br />
12. @ivkovi}, J., Bukovi} B., Njari, B. (1992.): Utjecaj<br />
pasminskog sastava na prinos i kakvo}u svinjskog<br />
mesa. Sto~arstvo, 46: 25.-31.<br />
13. ... .. Pravilnik o utvr|ivanju kategorija i klasa svinjskih<br />
trupova i polovica (1999.), N.N. br. 119.<br />
14. ….. Stat Soft. Inc. Statistica for Windows (Computer<br />
program manual), Tulsa, OK, 2001.<br />
FATTENING AND MEATINESS OF SOME TWO CROSSBREEDS IN PIGS<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Investigation of fattening and slaughter traits was conducted with crossbreeds between Swedish Landrace and Large<br />
White (SL x LW), Swedish Landrace and Pietrain (SL x P) as well as between Large White and Pietrain (LW x P). The<br />
pigs were fed in the same conditions. They were fed mixture containing 15.36% crude proteins and 13.22 MU/kg.<br />
Values of meat pH were determined by pH –meter Mettler Toledo, ability of meat water fixation according to Grau-<br />
Hamm (1952) whereas colour and meat marbling by an American NPCC method. No statistically significant differences<br />
were found (P>0.05) in terms of daily gain (640 g, 680 g and 6880 g) among the investigated pig genotypes.<br />
However, feed conversion differences were determined. The lowest feed consumption per gain kg was characterized<br />
by crossbreeds LW x P (2.04 kg) followed by crossbreeds SL x LW (3.22 kg) and crossbreeds SL x P (3.63). The<br />
highest meatiness of pork sides (55.15%) and their conformation were known by crossbreeds LW x P followed by<br />
(by the meatiness) crossbreeds SL x LW (54.71%) and crossbreeds SL x P (54.08%). Pig meat quality of the investigated<br />
genotypes was satisfactory. Crossbreeds with Pietrain (SL x P and LW x P) had slightly lower meat water fixation<br />
ability (9.70 cm 2 and 9. 80 cm 2 ) compared to the crossbreeds LW x SL (8.51cm 2 ). Crossbreeds with Pietrain<br />
were also characterized by lower meat colour intensity (2.50 and 2.33) and meat marbling (1.38 and 1.50) compared<br />
to colour intensity and meat marbling in crossbreeds LW x SL (2.75 and 2.50).<br />
Key-words: pigs, crossbreeds, fattening traits, slaughtering traits<br />
(Primljeno 14. o`ujka 2003.; prihva}eno 3. travnja 2003. - Received on 14 March 2003; accepted on 3 April 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
ISSN 1330-7142<br />
UDK = 636.127:636.064<br />
RAZVIJENOST I KORELACIJSKA POVEZANOST<br />
SEDMODNEVNE I [ESTOMJESE^NE LIPICANSKE @DREBADI<br />
T. Rastija (1) , Z. Antunovi} (1) , Mirjana Baban (1) , I. Mandi} (2) Izvorni znanstveni ~lanak<br />
Original scientific paper<br />
SA@ETAK<br />
Pra}enje razvoja `drebadi, naro~ito u prvim mjesecima njihovog `ivota, ukazuje na<br />
mogu}nost njihovog uspje{nog izbora. Pravilan postupak s podmlatkom te kvalitetna<br />
hranidba dojnih kobila osigurava uspje{an uzgoj `drebadi, koji ima pozitivan utjecaj i na<br />
njihov kasniji razvoj. Istra`ivanja su provedena na 82 {estomjese~ne `drebadi. Mjerenja<br />
visine grebena, opsega prsa i opsega cjevanice obavljena su sedmi dan nakon `drijebljenja<br />
i u dobi od {est mjeseci. Podaci o mjerenju obra|eni su prema statisti~kom programu<br />
SPSS/PC (Nie i sur., 1975.). Izra~unata je i korelacijska povezanost izme|u tjelesnih<br />
mjera sedmodnevne i {estomjese~ne `drebadi. Visina grebena {estomjese~ne u<br />
odnosu na sedmodnevnu `drebad pove}ala se je za 35%, opseg prsa za 69%, a opseg<br />
cjevanice za 34%. Korelacijska povezanost izme|u navedenih svojstava bila je visoko<br />
signifikantna na razini P=0,01 s korelacijskim koeficijentima, a koji su se kretali izme|u<br />
r=0,363 i r=0,820. Cilj tih istra`ivanja bio je spoznaja o me|usobnoj povezanosti razvoja<br />
`drebadi u ranoj fazi, tj. u fazi sisanja.<br />
Klju~ne rije~i: lipicanska pasmina, podmladak, rast i razvoj, korelacije<br />
UVOD<br />
Poznavanje rasta i razvoja podmlatka u konja,<br />
naro~ito u prvim mjesecima nakon `drijebljenja, i<br />
me|usobni utjecaj pojedinih tjelesnih dimenzija<br />
omogu}ava br`i i sigurniji uzgojno selekcijski rad.<br />
Prema podacima dostupne literature iz toga podru~ja,<br />
intenzivan rast i razvoj pojedinih tjelesnih mjera i njihova<br />
me|usobna povezanost u ranijoj `ivotnoj dobi ima<br />
pozitivan utjecaj i na kasniji razvoj.<br />
Istra`ivanjima o razvoju podmlatka lipicanske i<br />
ostalih pasmina konja bavili su se Romi} (1951.), Green<br />
(1961.), Stipi} (1980.), Rastija i sur. (1986., 1988.,<br />
1995., 1999., 2000., 2001., 2002.), Saastamoinen<br />
(1990.), Baban i sur. (1995.) i drugi.<br />
Ta istra`ivanja ukazuju na pozitivan me|usobni<br />
utjecaj tjelesnih mjera u `drebadi iste i razli~ite dobi.<br />
MATERIJAL I METODE<br />
Istra`ivanja su provedena na 82 `drebadi lipicanske<br />
pasmine oba spola. Mjerenja visine grebena<br />
Lydtinovim {tapom, opsega prsa i opsega cjevanice<br />
obavljena su sto~nom vrpcom na sedmodnevnoj i<br />
{estomjese~noj `drebadi. Vrijednosti dobivene mjerenjem<br />
obra|ene su prema statisti~kom programu<br />
SPSS/PC (Nie i sur., 1975.). Na temelju dobivenih vrijednosti,<br />
izra~unali smo i korelacijsku povezanost<br />
izme|u obra|enih svojstava `drebadi iste i razli~ite dobi.<br />
Statisti~ku zna~ajnost koeficijenata korelacije testirali<br />
smo “t” testom na razini 5% i 1% signifikantnosti.<br />
REZULTATI I RASPRAVA<br />
Vrijednosti istra`ivanja tjelesnih mjera sedmodnevne<br />
i {estomjese~ne `drebadi prikazane su u Tablici 1.<br />
Vrijednosti istra`ivanja tjelesnih mjera sedmodnevne<br />
i {estomjese~ne `drebadi lipicanske pasmine prikazane su<br />
u Tablici 1. Visina grebena sedmodnevne `drebadi u granicama<br />
je karakteristi~nim za lipicansku pasminu. Prema<br />
podacima Rastije i sur. (2001.), `drebad na{ih istra`ivanja<br />
bila su ni`a za 2,64 cm. Podaci Romi}a (1951.) znatno<br />
su slabije vrijednosti od na{ih istra`ivanja (92,82 cm za<br />
mu{ku i 92,58 cm za `ensku `drebad). Istra`ivanja Stipi}a<br />
(1980.) podudaraju se s na{im vrijednostima, kao i vrijednosti<br />
Rastije i sur. (1995. a). Tako|er i vrijednosti drugih<br />
istra`ivanja kre}u se u okviru granica za lipicansku pasminu,<br />
{to potvr|uje konsolidiranost uzgoja. Opseg prsa od<br />
80,49 cm je manji od vrijednosti do kojih su u svojim<br />
(1) Dr.sc. Tomo Rastija, red. prof., dr.sc. Zvonko Antunovi}, docent i<br />
dr.sc. Mirjana Baban, asistent – Sveu~ili{te Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u<br />
<strong>Osijeku</strong>, <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Trg sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek,<br />
(2) Ivica Mandi}, dipl.ing. - direktor ergele \akovo.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
T. Rastija i sur.: RAZVIJENOST I KORELACIJSKA POVEZANOST SEDMODNEVNE I ŠESTOMJESEÈNE ...<br />
61<br />
Tablica 1. Tjelesne mjere sedmodnevne i {estomjese~ne lipicanske `drebadi (n = 82)<br />
Table 1. The physical measures of the seven-day-old and six-month-old Lippizaner foals (n=82)<br />
istra`ivanjima do{li Rastija i sur. (1986., 1995.a, 2001.),<br />
Romi} (1951.) i Stipi} (1980.), dok se vrijednosti Mirjane<br />
Baban i sur. (1995.) podudaraju s na{im istra`ivanjima.<br />
Opseg cjevanice sedmodnevne `drebadi u Tablici<br />
1. bio je manji za 0,40 cm, odnosno 1,35 cm od vrijednosti<br />
Stipi}a (1980.), dok se vrijednosti Romi}evih<br />
(1951) istra`ivanja podudaraju s na{im podacima.<br />
Tako|er su i vrijednosti dobivene po Rastiji i sur. (1986,<br />
2001) neznatno ve}e od vrijednosti u Tablici 1.<br />
Navedena istra`ivanja ukazuju na konsolidirani<br />
uzgoj i uspje{no provo|enje uzgojno-selekcijskog rada,<br />
{to potvr|uju rezultati dosada{njih istra`ivanja.<br />
Korelacijska povezanost u Tablici 2. kretala se<br />
izme|u slabe do potpune, s korelacijskim koeficijentima<br />
od r = 0,363 do 0,824. Najslabija povezanost (r =<br />
0,363) utvr|ena je izme|u opsega prsa sedmodnevne i<br />
opsega cjevanice {estomjese~ne `drebadi, dok je<br />
najja~a povezanost (r = 0,824) izra~unata izme|u visine<br />
grebena i opsega prsa {estomjese~ne `drebadi.<br />
Testiranjem dobivenih korelacijskih koeficijenata<br />
Tablica 2. Korelacijska povezanost tjelesnih mjera<br />
sedmodnevne i {estomjese~ne lipicanske `drebadi<br />
Table 2. A correlation of physical measures of the sevenday-old<br />
and six-month-old Lippizaner foals<br />
1 = visina grebena sedmodnevne `drebadi – withers height of<br />
the seven-day-old foals<br />
2 = opseg prsa sedmodnevne `drebadi – chest girth of the<br />
seven-day-old foals<br />
3 = opseg cjevanice sedmodnevne `drebadi – cannon bone<br />
circumference of the seven-day-old foals<br />
4 = visina grebena {estomjese~ne `drebadi – withers height of<br />
the six-month old foals<br />
5 = opseg prsa {estomjese~ne `drebadi – withers height of the<br />
six- month old foals<br />
6 = opseg cjevanice {estomjese~ne `drebadi - cannon bone<br />
circumference of the six- month old foals<br />
utvr|ene su visoko signifikantne povezanosti.<br />
Navodi Rastije i sur. (1988.) ukazuju na pozitivan<br />
utjecaj visine grebena nakon poroda na visinu grebena u<br />
kasnijoj dobi, dok su vi{a `drebad imala ne{to slabije<br />
razvijen prsni ko{ u odnosu na ni`u `drebad.<br />
Saastamoinen (1990.) ukazuje na visoku korelacijsku<br />
povezanost tjelesnih mjera `drebadi u razvoju. Prema<br />
podacima Mc Canna i sur. (1988.), korelacijska povezanost<br />
tjelesnih mjera `drebadi u razvoju kretala se<br />
izme|u slabe i jake. Do sli~nih vrijednosti u svojim<br />
istra`ivanjima do{li su Hintz i sur. (1979.), Rastija i sur.<br />
(1995.b) utvrdili su pozitivnu povezanost visine grebena<br />
i opsega cjevanice podmlatka lipicanaca, koja je ja~e<br />
izra`ena kod iste nego razli~ite dobne strukture.<br />
Po istra`ivanjima Rastije i sur. (2001.), korelacijska<br />
povezanost mu{ke i `enske kao i oba spola lipicanske<br />
`drebadi kretala se izme|u slabe i vrlo jake.<br />
Rezultati dobivenih istra`ivanja, kao i vrijednosti u<br />
dostupnoj literaturi, ukazuju na mogu}nost uspje{nog<br />
provo|enja selekcije ve} kod podmlatka `drebadi, zbog<br />
pozitivne povezanosti tjelesnih mjera istodobne i `drebadi<br />
razli~ite dobi.<br />
ZAKLJU^AK<br />
Na temelju provedenih istra`ivanja razvoja podmlatka<br />
lipicanske pasmine, mo`e se zaklju~iti:<br />
- Visina grebena sedmodnevne lipicanske `drebadi<br />
iznosila je 100,988 cm, a {estomjese~ne 136,683 cm,<br />
odnosno 35,43% ve}a u odnosu na visinu sedmodnevne<br />
`drebadi.<br />
- Opseg prsa {estomjese~ne `drebadi u odnosu na<br />
sedmodnevnu `drebad pove}ao se za 69,20%, a opseg<br />
cjevanice za 33,67%.<br />
- Korelacijska povezanost izme|u navedenih svojstava<br />
sedmodnevne i {estomjese~ne lipicanske `drebadi<br />
kretala se izme|u slabe i vrlo jake, s korelacijskim<br />
koeficijentima od r = 0,363 do r = 0,824.<br />
- Povezanost je ja~e izra`ena izme|u tjelesnih<br />
mjera `drebadi iste dobi nego izme|u razli~ite dobi.<br />
- Testiranjem je utvr|ena visoko signifikantna<br />
povezanost izme|u tjelesnih mjera `drebadi.<br />
- Poznavanje povezanosti izme|u tjelesnih mjera<br />
iste i razli~ite dobi omogu}ava uspje{no provo|enje<br />
selekcije u uzgoju konja.<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
62<br />
T. Rastija i sur.: RAZVIJENOST I KORELACIJSKA POVEZANOST SEDMODNEVNE I ŠESTOMJESEÈNE ...<br />
LITERATURA<br />
1. Baban, M., Rastija, T., Kne`evi}, I., Ljube{i}, J. (1995.):<br />
Komparacija razvoja tjelesnih mjera lipicanske `drebadi<br />
po linijama. Poljoprivreda, 1(1):1.-7.<br />
2. Butler, I., Kelnhofer, R., Pirchner, F. (1986): Phenotypic<br />
correlations between conformation and performance<br />
traits of trotters. 37 th Ann. Meet. of Eur. Assoc. for<br />
Anim. Prod.<br />
3. Green, D.A. (1961): A review of studies on the growth<br />
rate of the horse. Br. Vet. J. 117, 181-191.<br />
4. Hintz, R.L., Hintz, H.F., Vleck, L.D. (1979): Growth rate<br />
of Thoroughbreds. Effect of age of dam, year and month<br />
of birth, and sex of foal. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 480-487.<br />
5. McCann, J.S., Heird, J.C., Ramsey, C.B., Long, R.A.<br />
(1988): Skeletal bone and muscle proportionality in<br />
small-and large-framed mature horses of different<br />
muscle thickness. Equine Vet. Sci. 8, 255-261.<br />
6. Nie, N., H., Hul, C.H., Jenkins, G. J., Steinbrenner, K.,<br />
Dole, H.B. (1975): Statistical Package for the Society<br />
Sciences 2 nd ed New York, Mc Grow-Hill.<br />
7. Rastija, T., Ljube{i}, J., Mandi}, I. (1986.): Komparativni<br />
prikaz razvoja `drebadi lipicanske pasmine. Sto~arstvo,<br />
40(7-8):249.-253.<br />
8. Rastija, T., Kne`evi}, I., Bari{i}, A. (1988.): Korelacijska<br />
povezanost razvoja tjelesnih mjera `drebadi lipicanske<br />
pasmine. Znan. prak. poljop. tehnol. 18(3-4):309.-315.<br />
9. Rastija, T., Baban, M., Kne`evi}, I. (1995.a): Usporedba<br />
nekih svojstava rasta mu{ke i `enske lipicanske `drebadi.<br />
Sto~arstvo, 49(3-4):89.-93.<br />
10. Rastija, T., Kne`evi}, I., Jovanovac, S., Mandi}, I., (1995<br />
b): Heritability and phenotypic correlations among<br />
measurements of lipizzaner horses. Sto~arstvo, 9-12,<br />
299-302.<br />
11. Rastija, T., Ljube{i}, J., Sukali}, M., Baban Mirjana,<br />
Kne`evi}, I. (1999.): Tjelesne mjere `drebadi holstein<br />
pasmine u razvoju. Poljoprivreda 5(1):27.-30.<br />
12. Rastija, T., Ljube{i}, J., Antunovi}, Z., Baban Mirjana,<br />
Sele{, J. (2000.): Utjecaj visine grebena, opsega prsa i<br />
opsega cjevanice nakon poroda na razvoj `drebadi holstein<br />
pasmine. Sto~arstvo, 54(6):419.-426.<br />
13. Rastija T., Kne`evi}, I., Antunovi}, Z., Bukvi}, @.,<br />
Gutzmirtl D., Mandi}, I. (2001.): Povezanost razvoja<br />
`drebadi lipicanske pasmine u fazi sisanja. Sto~arstvo,<br />
55(1):3.-12.<br />
14. Rastija, T. Antunovi}, Z., Bukvi}, @., Baban Mirjana,<br />
Bogut. I. (2001.): Povezanost tjelesnih mjera {estomjese~ne<br />
i dvogodi{nje `drebadi holstein pasmine.<br />
Sto~arstvo 55(2):83.-89.<br />
15. Rastija, T., Ljube{i}, J., Antunovi}, Z., Baban Mirjana,<br />
Bogut. I. (2002): Effect of some holstein foals birth body<br />
measurements on later development. Sto~arstvo<br />
56(1):3-13.<br />
16. Romi}, S. (1951.): Razvoj lipicanca do tri godine.<br />
Veterinarski arhiv, 7-8.<br />
17. Saastamoinen, M. (1990): Heritabilities for body size<br />
and growth rate and phenotypic correlations among<br />
measurements in young horses. ActaAgriculturae<br />
Scandinavica 40(4):377-386.<br />
18. Stipi}, L. (1980.): Ispitivanje populacije i uzgojnog procesa<br />
|akova~kog lipicanca. Sto~arstvo, 34: 291.-300.<br />
THE DEVELOPMENT AND CORRELATION OF THE<br />
SEVEN-DAY-OLD AND SIX-MONTH-OLD LIPPIZANER BREED FOALS<br />
SUMMARY<br />
Observation at he foals development, especially in their first months of life, gives a possibility of their successful<br />
selection. A correct offspring treatment from the early age and a quality feeding of lactating mares ensures a successful<br />
foals breeding, which has a positive influence on their further development. Eighty two six-month-old foals<br />
were included into the research. Measuring of the withers height, chest girth and cannon bone circumference were<br />
done seven days after foaling and at the age of six months. The measuring data were processed by the statistical<br />
program SPSS/PC (Nie et al., 1975). A correlation between physical measures of the seven-day-old and six-monthold<br />
foals was summed. Withers height of the six-month-old in relation to the seven-day-old foals increased by 35%,<br />
the chest girth by 69% and the cannon bone circumference by 34%. The correlation among attained values was<br />
highly significant at the level P=0.01 with correlation coefficients ranging between r=0,363 and r=0,820. The aim<br />
of this research was to get an insight of the mutual connection of foals development in the early phase, i.e. in the<br />
suckling phase.<br />
Key-words: the Lippizaner breed, offspring, growth and development, correlation<br />
(Primljeno 20. o`ujka 2003.; prihva}eno 7. travnja 2003. - Received on 20 March 2003; accepted on 7 April 2003)<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
UPUTE AUTORIMA<br />
"<strong>POLJOPRIVREDA</strong> znanstveno-stru~ni ~asopis" (ISSN 1330-7142), kojega publiciraju <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong> i<br />
<strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> institut Osijek, objavljuje znanstvene i stru~ne radove na hrvatskom i engleskom jeziku. Objavljuju se radovi koji nisu<br />
tiskani u drugim ~asopisima, niti predani u tisak. Izvodi, sa`eci, sinopsisi, magistarski radovi, disertacije te izlaganja na znanstvenim<br />
i stru~nim skupovima ne smatraju se objavljenim radovima. U dodatku ~asopisa mogu se objaviti prikazi knjiga ili njihove recenzije,<br />
kra}i prijevodi, osvrti i vijesti iz podru~ja poljoprivrede.<br />
Radovi se {alju u Uredni{tvo ~asopisa u 2 primjerka, a moraju zadovoljiti sljede}e tehni~ke propozicije:<br />
• Maksimalni obujam rada (uklju~uju}i tablice, grafikone, slike i sheme) je 10 stranica A-4 formata (max. znakova 30000,<br />
uklju~uju}i razmake izme|u rije~i), sa`etka disertacije 2 stranice, a sa`etka magistarskog rada 1 stranica.<br />
• Tekst mora biti pisati u Microfoft Word for Windows, verzija 6.0 ili vi{a, Font Times New Roman, s duplim proredom. Sve<br />
margine su 2,5 cm.<br />
• Cijeli rad treba pisati veli~inom slova 11, osim naslova rada (12), naslova i sadr`aja tablica (10) te sa`etaka (10).<br />
Naslov rada i poglavlja treba pisati velikim podebljanim slovima.<br />
• Grafikoni, slike i sheme trebaju biti ~isti, pregledni i snimljeni u Winword obliku te editirani kao integralni dio rada tj. u tekstu<br />
gdje dolaze. Radi sigurnije izvedbe tiskanja rada potrebito ih je tako|er dostaviti i u jednom od grafi~kih ili slikovnih<br />
formata (*.xls, *.tiff ili *.jpg), isklju~ivo u crno-bijeloj tehnici. Naslovi i sadr`aji tablica, grafikona, slika i shema u radu<br />
moraju biti prevedeni i na engleski jezik, i obrnuto. Ako je rad na hrvatskom jeziku, naslove tablica, grafikona, slika i<br />
shema treba pisati podebljanim slovima, a engleske prijevode njihovih naslova, kao i sadr`aja, treba pisati u kurzivu neboldiranim<br />
slovima, i obrnuto.<br />
• Po~etak odlomka (pasusa) u tekstu ne smije se uvla~iti tabelator tipkom, a odlomke treba razdijeliti tipkom ENTER. Treba<br />
koristiti automatsku numeraciju stranica (pozicija dolje desno).<br />
• Puna imena i prezimena autora, sa zvanjima i adresama ustanova u kojima rade (veli~ina slova 10, kurziv) stavljaju se na<br />
kraju prve stranice ispod crte duge 3 cm i ne smiju se pisati u programu automatske fusnote. U slu~aju da rad zahtijeva<br />
pisanje fusnota, po`eljno je koristiti automatske fusnote.<br />
• Citirani autori u radu ne smiju biti podebljani, pisani u kurzivu niti velikim slovima.<br />
• Za pisanje decimalnih brojeva u tekstovima i tablicama na hrvatskom jeziku treba koristiti isklju~ivo zareze, odnosno u<br />
engleskoj verziji isklju~ivo to~ke. U hrvatskim tekstovima i tablicama, kao i u popisu literature, iza svih spomenutih<br />
godina obvezno dolazi to~ka.<br />
Radovi }e biti recenzirani od najmanje 2 recenzenta iz odgovaraju}eg podru~ja i lektorirani. Recenzenti obavljaju kategorizaciju<br />
radova: izvorni znanstveni ~lanak (original scientific paper), pregledni znanstveni ~lanak (scientific review), prethodno<br />
priop}enje (preliminary communication), izlaganje na znanstvenom skupu (conference paper), stru~ni ~lanak (professional<br />
paper). Svi radovi dobivaju UDK klasifikacijski broj (rad se kategorizira prema odre|enim podru~jima). Radovi tiskani na hrvatskom<br />
jeziku moraju imati kurzivom napisane engleske prijevode Naslova, Sa`etka, Klju~nih rije~i te tablica i grafikona, i obrnuto.<br />
U radu tiskanom na hrvatskom jeziku engleske verzije Sa`etka i Klju~nih rije~i dolaze na kraju rada, iza poglavlja Literatura, i obrnuto.<br />
Radovi u pravilu sadr`e:<br />
NASLOV: treba biti {to kra}i, informativan, pisan velikim tiskanim (podebljanim) slovima, font 12. Ispod naslova dolaze inicijali<br />
imena (`enski autori puno ime) i prezime autora bez akademske titule, a iza svakog prezimena ozna~iti eksponentom ukoliko<br />
autori nisu iz iste ustanove (podebljanim slovima u kurzivu font 11).<br />
SA@ETAK: jezgrovit prikaz rada koji ~itatelju omogu}ava procjenu zanimljivosti rada. Sa`etak treba biti napisan podebljanim<br />
slovima u kurzivu (font 10) i da se bez ve}e prerade mo`e tiskati u referalnim ~asopisima. Optimalna du`ina je oko 100 rije~i.<br />
Sa`etak mora sadr`avati klju~ne rije~i bitne zbog uklju~ivanja u informacijske sustave, a koje tako|er treba pisati podebljanim slovima<br />
u kurzivu (font 10).<br />
UVOD: izla`e se ideja i cilj provedenih istra`ivanja, a mo`e se dati vrlo selektivan osvrt na literaturu, ako nema posebnog<br />
poglavlja "Pregled literature".<br />
MATERIJAL I METODE: detaljno se opisuju samo nove ili modificirane metode. Za poznate metode i postupke daje se samo<br />
literaturni izvor.<br />
REZULTATI I RASPRAVA: opisuju se utvr|ene ~injenice i zakonitosti, obja{njavaju pojave te potvr|uje ili negira postavljena<br />
hipoteza. U raspravi treba usporedbom s radovima drugih autora potkrijepiti zna~aj vlastitih istra`ivanja. Treba voditi ra~una da se<br />
isti podaci ne ponavljaju u tablicama, grafikonima te ponovno u tekstu.<br />
ZAKLJU^AK: sadr`i sintezu istra`ivanja i rezultata. Pri njegovom pisanju va`na je postupnost u izlaganju.<br />
LITERATURA: pi{e se abecednim redom s rednim brojem ispred prvog autora, s punim podacima (autori, godina, naziv reference,<br />
izdava~, mjesto izdavanja, stranice). Autore ne pisati velikim slovima.<br />
Zadnju verziju rada, ispravljenu prema primjedbama recenzenata, treba poslati Uredni{tvu u jednom primjerku, kao<br />
i snimak rada na disketi. Rukopisi radova i diskete se ne vra}aju.<br />
Adresa: Uredni{tvo ~asopisa "Poljoprivreda", <strong>Poljoprivredni</strong> <strong>fakultet</strong> u <strong>Osijeku</strong>, Trg sv.Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek<br />
Kontakt osobe i tehni~ki urednici: Manda Antunovi}, tel. +385 31 224 255; Fax: +385 31 207 017; E-mail:<br />
Manda.Antunovic@pfos.hr i Danica Han`ek, tel. +385 31 224 240; E-mail: dhanzek@pfos.hr<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS<br />
"AGRICULTURE Scientific and Professional Review" (ISSN 1330-7142) is published by The Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek and<br />
The Osijek Agricultural Institute. Scientific and professional papers are published in both Croatian and English language. Papers are accepted<br />
on the understanding that they have not been or will be published elsewhere. Inferences, summaries, synopses, master's theses, dissertations<br />
as well as presentations at symposia are not considered as published papers. Book surveys or their reviews, short translations<br />
and communications covering agriculture field will also be published in the journal supplement.<br />
The manuscripts submitted to Editorial Board in2 copies and should meet propositions as follows:<br />
• Maximum paper scope (including tables, graphs, figures and other supplements) is 10 printed pages of A-4 format (30 000 characters,<br />
including spaces between words), dissertation summary 2 pages and master's one 1 page.<br />
• Text should be written in Microsoft Word for Windows version 6.0 or higher, Font Times New Roman, with line spacing 2. All margins<br />
should be 2.5 cm<br />
• The whole text should be written in letters sized 11 except head title (size 12), authors' names and addresses, summaries and<br />
graphs and tables description (size 10). Headtitle and subtitles of the sections should be written in bolded capital letters.<br />
• Initial paragraph must not be drawn in, neither key tabulator can be used, paragraphs should be divided by ENTER key. Automatic<br />
page numbering should be used (position bottom right)<br />
• Full authors' names with titles, occupations and addresses of the institutions they work at (letter size 10, italic) should be placed at<br />
the bottom of the first page below 3 cm long line, they are not allowed to be written in the automatic footnote program. In case of<br />
footnote writing, automatic footnotes are advised.<br />
• Cited authors in the paper must not be bolded, written in italic or capitalized.<br />
• Graphs, figures and schemes should be as clear as possible and easy to survey. They must be saved in Winword and edited as an<br />
integral part of the paper (in the text). Titles of tables and graphs in the paper written in Croatian language should be bolded whereas<br />
English translations in italic are devised to be unbolded and vice versa (font 10). Colour graphs and figures are not welcome.<br />
Due to more sured paper printing, graphs and figures should also be submitted in one of graphic or figure formats (*.xls, *.tiff<br />
or *.jpg). They must not be submitted as drawings on parchment paper. Titles as well as contents of tables, graphs, figures and<br />
schemes of the paper must be also translated in English and vice versa. If the paper is written in Croatian language titles of tables,<br />
graphs, figures and schemes should be written in bolded letters whereas English translations of their titles as well as contents<br />
should be written in italic unbolded letters and vice versa.<br />
• Only commas should be written in Croatian texts while using decimal numbers in both text and tables whereas a point in an<br />
English version. In Croatian texts and tables as well as in a literature list a point should be placed after all mentioned years.<br />
Papers will be reviewed by at least 2 critics from corresponding field and language edited. Papers are classified by reviewers into:<br />
original scientific paper, scientific review, preliminary communication, conference paper and professional paper. All papers have<br />
UDK classification number (a paper is classified per certain fields). Titles, summaries, key-words, tables and graphs of the papers printed<br />
in Croatian language must be written in English (italic) and vice versa. English version of summary and key-words in the Croatian<br />
printed text is placed at the end of the paper after Literature chapter and vice versa.<br />
Generally, all papers should be divided into the following sections:<br />
TITLE: Should be as short as possible, informative, written in capital (bolded) letters, font 12. Initials of authors' name (full name<br />
for females) and surname without academic titles should be placed below the title. Each surname should be followed by an exponent if<br />
authors do not work in the same institution (bolded letters in italic font 11).<br />
SUMMARY: A core display of the paper presenting readers clear idea of what it is about. Summary should be written in bolded letters<br />
in italic (font 10) enabling printing the paper in referable journals without a large-scale revision. Optimal length should be kept to<br />
approx. 100 words. Summary should contain key-words, vital for incorporating into information systems, that must also be written in<br />
bolded italic letters (font 10).<br />
INTRODUCTION: Displays an idea and aim of the conducted investigations. Very selective review of the literature may also be given<br />
here if there is no special section "Literature review".<br />
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Only new or modified methods are described in details whereas literature source is given for recognized<br />
methods and procedures.<br />
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Determined facts and regularities are described, phenomena are explained whereas set up hypothesis<br />
is confirmed or denied. Significance of the own investigations should be substantiated by comparing them with other authors' papers.<br />
Care should be taken in avoiding repeted data in tables, graphs and again in the text.<br />
CONCLUSION: Contains synthesis of the investigations and results. While writing take care of the presentation graduation.<br />
REFERENCES: References should be listed alphabetically by putting ordinal number before the first author, full data is required<br />
(authors, year, reference name, editor, editing place, pages). Authors should not be written in capital letters.<br />
Final versions of papers, corrected regarding to reviewer's opinions, must be sent to Editorial Board printed in one copy and<br />
on a floppy disk. Manuscripts and disks will not be returned.<br />
Address: Editorial Board of the Journal "Agriculture", The Faculty of Agriculture in Osijek, Trg Sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia<br />
Contact persons and technical editors: Manda Antunovi}, Tel.: +385 31 224 255; Fax: +385 31 207 017; E-mail:<br />
Manda.Antunovic@pfos.hr and Danica Han`ek, Tel. + 385 31 224 240; E-mail: dhanzek@pfos.hr<br />
Poljoprivreda 9 (2003)
UDK 63 ISSN 1330-7142<br />
AGRICULTURE<br />
Scientific and Professional Review<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Volume 9; Number 1; June, 2003<br />
Z. Zduni}, D. [imi}, I. Brki}, A. Jambrovi}, Renata Zduni}, Tatjana Leden~an<br />
ESTIMATION OF GENETIC EFFECTS ON PLANT HEIGHT IN TWO SPECIFIC PAIRS OF<br />
INBRED LINES AND ITS SIX BASIC GENERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5<br />
Manda Antunovi}, V. Kova~evi}, Mirta Rastija, Z. Zduni}<br />
INFLUENCES OF SOIL AND GENOTYPES ON MICRONUTRIENTS STATUS IN MAIZE PLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9<br />
V. Kova~evi}, I. Brki}<br />
INFLUENCE OF POTASSIUM CHLORIDE ON YIELD AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS IN CORN HYBRIDS . . . . . . . . . 15<br />
B. [imi}, V. Kova~evi}, Zorica Jurkovi}<br />
RESPONSE OF MAIZE GENOTYPES TO FERTILIZATION ON HYDROMORPHIC SOIL OF SAVA VALLEY . . . . . . . . 20<br />
Mira Kne`evi}, Marija \urki}, I. Kne`evi}, K. Hajba<br />
INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE AND LOW HERBICIDE DOSES ON WEED POPULATIONS<br />
AND SPRING BARLEY YIELD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25<br />
A. Kristek, Zvjezdana Magud, Manda Antunovi}, Suzana Kristek<br />
THE PRODUCTIVITY OF SUGAR BEET MONOGERM LINES DEPENDING ON CERCOSPORA<br />
(Cercospora beticola Sacc.) SUSCEPTIBILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31<br />
T. ^upi}, S. Popovi}, Marijana Tucak, M. Stjepanovi}, Sonja Grlju{i}<br />
ESTIMATION OF PEA GRAIN YIELD STABILITY (Pisum sativum L.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />
T. Karadeniz, A. Kazankaya, T. Yarilgaç<br />
DETERMINATION OF THE POMOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALMONDS<br />
(Prunus amygdalus Batsh) GROWN IN MALATYA (TURKEY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42<br />
M.Yercan, S. Engindeniz<br />
PROFITABILTY OF DRIED FIG PRODUCTION (A CASE STUDY OF TURKEY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46<br />
P. Miji}, I. Kne`evi}<br />
NEW WAY OF EVALUATING COW MILK IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52<br />
\. Sen~i}, Marcela [peranda, Z. Antunovi}, T. [peranda<br />
FATTENING AND MEATINESS OF SOME TWO CROSSBREEDS IN PIGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56<br />
T. Rastija, Z. Antunovi}, Mirjana Baban, I. Mandi}<br />
THE DEVELOPMENT AND CORRELATION OF THE SEVEN-DAY-OLD AND SIX-MONTH-OLD<br />
LIPPIZANER BREED FOALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60<br />
1<br />
OSIJEK<br />
2003.<br />
Vol. 9