Non Technical Summary - Partnerships for Renewables

Non Technical Summary - Partnerships for Renewables Non Technical Summary - Partnerships for Renewables

20.05.2014 Views

The Development Proposals continued > The Site Location Plan (Figure 1.1 of the ES) and Proposed Wind Energy Development Layout (Figure 1.2a of the ES) are reproduced at the end of this NTS along with a diagram of a typical wind turbine structure (Figure 4.1 of the ES) which is a 2MW-3MW machine with a 125m tip height. This is the maximum overall height (to vertical blade tip) of the turbine to be installed. The method of connection to the local distribution network has yet to be determined. Negotiations are underway currently between PfR and Scottish and Southern Electric to determine viable connection options; the anticipated option for the connection of the wind turbines is 3.5km of underground cabling within the public highway from the development site to Newport sub-station. The development site is located towards the north of the Isle of Wight on the north-western fringe of Newport centred on grid reference E 448140 N 91146. The development site comprises the grounds of HMP Isle of Wight and is therefore bound by a large perimeter fence to the north and west. Three separate prisons, Camp Hill, Parkhurst and Albany and their associated buildings, make up HMP Isle of Wight and lie to the south and south-east of the development site. To the east of the site is the residential area of Parkhurst which is located along the A3020 and to south beyond the prison lies the residential area of Hunny Hill along the A3054. A number of residential properties are also found beyond Noke Plantation along Noke Common to the north-east of the site. Access to the development site at Camp Hill is via the A3020 on to Clissold Road from which the prison is accessed. Access will be taken via two routes; one from the north and one from the south. The northern route will be utilised to transfer all turbine components, site equipment and site structures and the southern route will be utilised to transfer all aggregate and ready mix concrete required by the development. The main body of the development site comprises of agricultural land predominantly open fields of grassland divided by hedges and mature trees. It is part of Holme Hill, a small hill, with the highest point being the northern central part of the site at around 65m above Ordnance Datum (AOD). It is bounded to the north and west by Parkhurst Forest which, in part, is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC). To the east it is bounded by an area of forest known as Noke Plantation and to the south by further agricultural fields which, in turn, bound the prison buildings. Additionally the woodland to the immediate north and west of the development site boundary is designated as ancient woodland. The planning application is for: “The erection, 25 year operation and subsequent decommissioning of a wind energy development comprised of the following elements: two wind turbines with a maximum overall height (to vertical blade tip) of up to 125 metres; together with, offsite highway works, an upgraded junction off Parkhurst Road, modifications to the existing access track, new access tracks, hardstanding areas, a control building, cabling, a temporary construction compound, and other works and development ancillary to the main development.” Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) EIA is a process that collects information about potential environmental effects of a proposed development and evaluates and presents this information in a way that both assists consultation and enables decision-makers to take account of these effects when determining whether or not a project should proceed. If the project does proceed the EIA also helps identify any mitigation measures or controls over the construction or operation that might be required. The content and scope of the EIA was agreed through a scoping exercise in April 2011 with the Isle of Wight Council. The EIA has identified the likely effects of the proposed development on the environment and an assessment has been made as to whether any of these could be significant. In general terms establishing whether an identified effect is significant is determined by the importance of the receptor (e.g. a particular listed building, ecological designated site or landscape character area) and the magnitude of change that will occur as a result of the construction, operation and de-commissioning of the turbines which, in turn, establishes the significance of that effect. Chapter 2 of the ES sets out the EIA methodology employed in more detail. To avoid or minimise any potential adverse effects identified a number of mitigation measures have been incorporated into the design of the proposed development. These measures are set out in a proposed Environmental Management Plan (EMP) (Chapter 15 of the ES) to be implemented during the construction and operation of the wind turbines. The Environmental Statement (ES) reports the findings of the EIA which has been prepared in accordance with The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. The ES comprises this NTS and three volumes: Volume 1 – Written Statement, Volume 2 – Figures and Volume 3 – Appendices. The assessment of effects has been undertaken in an impartial manner with the findings presented systematically in the ES and this will be used by the Isle of Wight Council to help inform its decision about whether or not the proposed wind turbines at Camp Hill should be allowed to proceed. 04

Consultation A vital aspect of the EIA process is consultation both to agree which environmental topics need most attention (scope of the EIA and methodologies to be adopted in assessing likely effects) and to understand public perception of the development in order to help inform the design process. Consultation with statutory and non-statutory bodies was undertaken through a formal scoping exercise with the Isle of Wight Council in April 2011. In addition, there has been continued dialogue with relevant statutory and non-statutory consultees both before and after the Scoping Opinion (setting out the environmental topics to be considered further) was received from the Isle of Wight Council. The full list of consultees is set out in Chapter 3 of the ES and includes: Natural England; RSPB; Isle of Wight AONB Partnership; the Isle of Wight Council Archaeologist; the Isle of Wight Council Highways and Transport Department; and the Isle of Wight Council Ecologist. PfR has also undertaken public consultation involving public exhibitions and community surgeries with local residents dating back to 2010. PfR has held regular community surgeries at various stages of the project where PfR staff have been available to discuss the project in an informal setting with members of the public. These took place in February, May and September 2011. In February and March 2012 update presentations were given in public to both Northwood and Newport parish councils. Public exhibitions were held in October 2010 and March 2012. A number of local groups such as the Footprint Trust have also been met with and kept up to date throughout the project development process. A separate Statement of Public Consultation has been produced and forms part of the planning submission. Environmental Effects The scoping exercise identified a range of potential environmental effects. These were subjected to detailed assessments using methodologies specific to the relevant environmental topic. Those considered in this ES are listed as follows: • Climate change mitigation and other atmospheric emissions - Chapter 6; • Transport – Chapter 7; • Noise – Chapter 8; • Landscape and visual effects – Chapter 9; • Cultural heritage– Chapter 10; • Ecology (including impact on trees)– Chapter 11; • Ornithology – Chapter 12; • Hydrology – Chapter 13; and • Shadow Flicker – Chapter 14. The following sections provide a brief, non-technical, summary of the main findings of the EIA split by environmental topic. These findings are described in detail within the individual environmental topic chapters of the ES. The Environmental Statement The ES, which accompanies the planning application to the Isle of Wight Council, provides an assessment of identified significant environmental effects resulting from the construction, operation and de-commissioning of the proposed wind turbines at Camp Hill. The following sections provide a brief, non-technical, summary of the main findings of the EIA which are described in detail within the individual chapters of the full ES. Climate Change – Chapter 6 The assessment of the effects on climate change involved a calculation of the expected renewable electricity that would be produced by the wind energy development. As set out above the assessment calculated that the proposed wind turbines could annually generate between 8,760MWh and 13,140MWh of renewable electricity per year. This is equivalent to the amount of electricity used annually by approximately 1,963 to 2,944 average households and avoids between 3,767 and 5,650 tonnes of CO 2 equivalent emissions per year. The ES concluded that maximising the renewable energy potential of the development site would result in a positive effect on climate change although it was not considered appropriate to assign any level of significance to this effect. Traffic and Transport – Chapter 7 Estimates of traffic generation associated with the construction phase of the proposed Camp Hill Wind Energy Development have been derived from a first principles approach based on calculations of vehicle loads of imported materials. The most significant impacts will occur during the construction phase when there would be an increase in the volume of construction traffic utilising the surrounding road network to deliver the wind farm components, equipment and resources necessary for the construction. No impacts are expected during the operation of the site since the turbines will be controlled remotely and only occasional maintenance visits will be required which will most likely be undertaken in a 4x4 vehicle. The site will be accessed via two routes; one from the north and one from the south of the site. The intended routes broadly comprise: • Northern Route: Medina Wharf – Arctic Road – A3020 – Clissold Road - Site • Southern Route: A3056 – A3020 – Clissold Road - Site Section continues overleaf > 05

Consultation<br />

A vital aspect of the EIA process is consultation both to agree<br />

which environmental topics need most attention (scope<br />

of the EIA and methodologies to be adopted in assessing<br />

likely effects) and to understand public perception of the<br />

development in order to help in<strong>for</strong>m the design process.<br />

Consultation with statutory and non-statutory bodies was<br />

undertaken through a <strong>for</strong>mal scoping exercise with the Isle<br />

of Wight Council in April 2011. In addition, there has been<br />

continued dialogue with relevant statutory and non-statutory<br />

consultees both be<strong>for</strong>e and after the Scoping Opinion (setting<br />

out the environmental topics to be considered further)<br />

was received from the Isle of Wight Council. The full list of<br />

consultees is set out in Chapter 3 of the ES and includes:<br />

Natural England; RSPB; Isle of Wight AONB Partnership; the<br />

Isle of Wight Council Archaeologist; the Isle of Wight Council<br />

Highways and Transport Department; and the Isle of Wight<br />

Council Ecologist.<br />

PfR has also undertaken public consultation involving public<br />

exhibitions and community surgeries with local residents<br />

dating back to 2010. PfR has held regular community<br />

surgeries at various stages of the project where PfR staff<br />

have been available to discuss the project in an in<strong>for</strong>mal<br />

setting with members of the public. These took place in<br />

February, May and September 2011. In February and March<br />

2012 update presentations were given in public to both<br />

Northwood and Newport parish councils. Public exhibitions<br />

were held in October 2010 and March 2012. A number of<br />

local groups such as the Footprint Trust have also been met<br />

with and kept up to date throughout the project development<br />

process. A separate Statement of Public Consultation has<br />

been produced and <strong>for</strong>ms part of the planning submission.<br />

Environmental Effects<br />

The scoping exercise identified a range of potential<br />

environmental effects. These were subjected to detailed<br />

assessments using methodologies specific to the relevant<br />

environmental topic. Those considered in this ES are listed<br />

as follows:<br />

• Climate change mitigation and other atmospheric<br />

emissions - Chapter 6;<br />

• Transport – Chapter 7;<br />

• Noise – Chapter 8;<br />

• Landscape and visual effects – Chapter 9;<br />

• Cultural heritage– Chapter 10;<br />

• Ecology (including impact on trees)– Chapter 11;<br />

• Ornithology – Chapter 12;<br />

• Hydrology – Chapter 13; and<br />

• Shadow Flicker – Chapter 14.<br />

The following sections provide a brief, non-technical,<br />

summary of the main findings of the EIA split by<br />

environmental topic. These findings are described in detail<br />

within the individual environmental topic chapters of the ES.<br />

The Environmental Statement<br />

The ES, which accompanies the planning application<br />

to the Isle of Wight Council, provides an assessment of<br />

identified significant environmental effects resulting from<br />

the construction, operation and de-commissioning of the<br />

proposed wind turbines at Camp Hill. The following sections<br />

provide a brief, non-technical, summary of the main findings<br />

of the EIA which are described in detail within the individual<br />

chapters of the full ES.<br />

Climate Change – Chapter 6<br />

The assessment of the effects on climate change involved<br />

a calculation of the expected renewable electricity that<br />

would be produced by the wind energy development. As<br />

set out above the assessment calculated that the proposed<br />

wind turbines could annually generate between 8,760MWh<br />

and 13,140MWh of renewable electricity per year. This is<br />

equivalent to the amount of electricity used annually by<br />

approximately 1,963 to 2,944 average households and<br />

avoids between 3,767 and 5,650 tonnes of CO 2 equivalent<br />

emissions per year. The ES concluded that maximising<br />

the renewable energy potential of the development site<br />

would result in a positive effect on climate change although<br />

it was not considered appropriate to assign any level of<br />

significance to this effect.<br />

Traffic and Transport – Chapter 7<br />

Estimates of traffic generation associated with the<br />

construction phase of the proposed Camp Hill Wind Energy<br />

Development have been derived from a first principles<br />

approach based on calculations of vehicle loads of<br />

imported materials.<br />

The most significant impacts will occur during the<br />

construction phase when there would be an increase in the<br />

volume of construction traffic utilising the surrounding road<br />

network to deliver the wind farm components, equipment<br />

and resources necessary <strong>for</strong> the construction. No impacts<br />

are expected during the operation of the site since the<br />

turbines will be controlled remotely and only occasional<br />

maintenance visits will be required which will most likely be<br />

undertaken in a 4x4 vehicle.<br />

The site will be accessed via two routes; one from the north<br />

and one from the south of the site. The intended routes<br />

broadly comprise:<br />

• Northern Route: Medina Wharf – Arctic Road – A3020 –<br />

Clissold Road - Site<br />

• Southern Route: A3056 – A3020 – Clissold Road - Site<br />

Section continues overleaf ><br />

05

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!