20.05.2014 Views

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Counterparty default risk<br />

Mortgage loans are closely related to Mortgage <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e and are thus frequently regarded<br />

as a substitute. However, the resulting capital requirements under QIS5 were not necessarily<br />

identical. In contrast to <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e, mortgage loans were allocated to counterparty default<br />

risk. <strong>The</strong> calculation of the capital requirement in this category does not depend directly on the<br />

creditworthiness of the borrower or on the term of the mortgage loan. Instead, it is based on<br />

the relationship between the market value of the security provided (i.e. the property) and the<br />

market value of the loan. <strong>The</strong> capital requirement for a loan that is fully covered by collateral<br />

is around 4% (cf. figure 3). This level is roughly comparable to the capital requirement for a<br />

AAA-rated <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> designed as a zero-coupon bond with a seven-year maturity. This would<br />

render unfounded the concerns sometimes expressed that Solvency II creates significant competitive<br />

advantages for mortgage loans over <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e. However, this concern remains valid<br />

if one takes into account the fact that the large majority of the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e currently issued<br />

have maturities of six to eight years.<br />

Fig. 3:<br />

Counterparty default risk<br />

Counterparty default risk: Capital requirement as percentage of<br />

mortgage loan on market value basis<br />

16%<br />

14%<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

0%<br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130%<br />

Ratio: Market value of security (property) / market value of loan<br />

41<br />

However, since the interest rate risk will in future give insurers incentives to increase duration<br />

on the asset side depending on the maturity of their technical liabilities, the above statement<br />

is disputable. This is because duration is ignored in the calculation of counterparty default risk<br />

in the Solvency II standard model. As a consequence, the creation or building up of a portfolio<br />

with long-term mortgage loans gives insurers the opportunity to minimise the capital requirement<br />

for interest rate risk without being punished elsewhere. However, increasing the level of<br />

duration within a <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> portfolio would result in an additional capital requirement in the<br />

spread risk. Investment in long-term government debt from the EEA offers a more favourable<br />

solution. Such investments are subject to no additional costs – neither from the spread risk nor<br />

from the counterparty default risk – beyond the capital requirements of the interest rate risk.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!