20.05.2014 Views

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effects of Basel III on the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>-based lending business<br />

Development of regulatory capital requirements under Basel III<br />

12%<br />

Tier 1 (core) capital<br />

10%<br />

Conservation buffer<br />

(consisting of common<br />

equity Tier 1 capital)<br />

Common equity Tier 1<br />

capital<br />

Hybrid capital<br />

Supplementary (Tier 2)<br />

capital<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

2%<br />

4%<br />

3.5%<br />

1%<br />

3.5%<br />

4%<br />

1.5%<br />

2.5%<br />

4.5%<br />

1.5%<br />

2%<br />

0.625%<br />

4.5%<br />

1.5%<br />

2%<br />

1.25%<br />

4.5%<br />

1.5%<br />

2%<br />

1.875%<br />

4.5%<br />

1.5%<br />

2%<br />

2.5%<br />

4.5%<br />

1.5%<br />

2%<br />

Countercyclical capital buffer<br />

0% to 2.5% common equity Tier 1 capital – national discretion<br />

No longer qualifying<br />

capital instruments (Tier 1 + 2)<br />

Deductions<br />

10-year transition phase<br />

20% 40% 60% 60% 100%<br />

<strong>2011</strong> <strong>2012</strong> 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019<br />

32<br />

New capital requirements introduced to reflect the counterparty credit risks of OTC derivatives<br />

will be particularly relevant to <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> banks that have included derivatives in cover<br />

in order to address interest-rate or exchange-rate risks. Here, the Basel III rules provide for<br />

the introduction of a regulatory capital requirement for the CVA (Credit Valuation Adjustment)<br />

risk, understood to refer to the risk of mark-to-market losses on derivatives due to deterioration<br />

in the credit risk of the derivative counterparty. As a rule, the appropriate capital charge<br />

is determined at the level of the entire derivative portfolio, using a prescribed regulatory formula<br />

which, in particular, includes the EaD (Exposure at Default) values and the credit-risk<br />

weighting, determined using the methods already applied for the purposes of the default risk<br />

capital charge. For derivative contracts entered into with a central counterparty, the previous<br />

exposure exemption will be repealed. However, for such derivatives, a privileged risk weighting<br />

is proposed in order to preserve the incentive to clear through central counterparties. In<br />

addition, banks using the IRB approach will be subject to higher capital charges for exposures<br />

to most companies in the finance industry, as the Basel III rules increase the measure used for<br />

the systematic risk of such companies within the risk-weighting formula.<br />

Excursus: Treatment of mortgage loans under CRD IV<br />

<strong>The</strong> CRD IV is intended not only to implement the Basel III framework at the level of the EU,<br />

but also to bring about further standardisation of the regulatory framework in Europe by abolishing<br />

national options and discretionary powers (creation of a “Single Rule Book”). Especially<br />

relevant to <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> banks in this regard is the planned revision of options for privileged<br />

treatment of mortgage loans within the context of regulatory risk-weighting. Above all the proposal<br />

suggests to<br />

introduce a “hard test”, within the meaning of Article 35, paragraph 3, clause 2 of the German<br />

Solvency Regulation (SolvV) in the residential property segment (as a precondition for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!