20.05.2014 Views

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and to meet liquidity management costs. Over and above this, it is at the issuer’s discretion to<br />

maintain further excess cover. Most rating agencies stipulate this as a precondition for awarding<br />

top ratings to <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e.<br />

Unlike those for Mortgage Backed Securities, cover pools for <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e are dynamic. This<br />

means their composition changes over time, depending on the maturities and the assets that<br />

are newly registered and included in cover. Loans are repaid or are removed from the cover for<br />

other reasons, to be replaced by new loans, and new lending is included in cover to enable the<br />

<strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Bank to issue new <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e. Thus, the cover pools have to be actively administered<br />

to assure matching cover at all times. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Act stipulates that risk management<br />

systems must be installed to identify, assess, control and monitor the relevant risks such as<br />

counterparty risks, interest rate, currency and other market price risks, operational risks and<br />

liquidity risks (§ 27 <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Act).<br />

§ 27 of the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Act covers the general handling of different risks inherent to the<br />

cover pools. Whereas specific limits are stipulated for interest rate, currency and credit risks,<br />

the liquidity risk had originally not been explicitly addressed. Liquidity risk is defined here as<br />

the risk that, in the event of the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Bank’s insolvency, the cover pool will be unable to<br />

provide sufficient liquidity to ensure the timely servicing of the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e maturing in the<br />

months to follow, e.g. large-volume Jumbo <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e. Rating agencies and investors saw in<br />

the absence of a provision dealing explicitly with this possibility a weakness in the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong><br />

Act, occasioning rating agencies to call for excess overcollateralization to cover this liquidity<br />

risk.<br />

Against this background, under the 2009 amendment a new provision to limit the shortterm<br />

liquidity risk was added (§ 4 par. 1a <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Act). Accordingly, the maximum cumulated<br />

liquidity need of the next 180 days 1) must be secured by assets that can be used as excess<br />

overcollateralization, as well as other liquid cover assets. Liquid assets are considered to be all<br />

the financial instruments entered in the cover register which the European System of Central<br />

Banks (ESCB) has classified as being eligible for central bank credit (ECB-eligible assets). Various<br />

limits do not apply to such assets that are entered in the cover register solely to manage<br />

liquidity.<br />

15<br />

Transparency of the Cover Pools<br />

To give investors as exact and up-to-date a picture as possible of the composition of the cover<br />

pools and the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong>e outstanding, <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Banks are required to publish certain<br />

information on a quarterly basis and additional data annually. Such information includes, for<br />

instance, the regional distribution of the cover assets, the type of properties lent against, the<br />

debtors of public-sector liabilities and the amount of claims that are at least 90 days in arrears.<br />

This allows <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> creditors to compare the cover pools of different <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Banks. <strong>The</strong><br />

2010 amendment of the <strong>Pfandbrief</strong> Act provided for a period of one month after the end of<br />

each quarter. <strong>The</strong> quarterly report must be published within this one-month period; this period<br />

will be extended to two months for the fourth quarter.<br />

1)<br />

<strong>The</strong> draft law originally provided for a liquidity buffer of 90 days (Bundesrat printed paper 16/11130 of December 1, 2008, p. 30).<br />

Because, during the course of the financial crisis, this was considered too short the Bundestag followed the proposal made by the<br />

Central Credit Committee of the Leading Associations of the German Credit Industry (ZKA) and increased this reserve to 180 days.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!