20.05.2014 Views

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

The Pfandbrief 2011 | 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Methodologies of the Rating Agencies<br />

Fitch Ratings’ Covered Bonds (CBs) Rating Methodology | Fitch Ratings methodology mainly addresses<br />

the probability of default (PD) of the debt but also incorporates an element of post-default recovery expectation.<br />

Fitch Ratings defines “default” as failure to make full and timely payments of interest and/or principal<br />

on payments due under the instruments.<br />

<strong>The</strong> covered bonds rating methodology has been applied since 2007 and covers the following analytical steps:<br />

— Discontinuity: Analyses the risk that payments due on the CB are not met in a timely manner as a consequence<br />

of the insolvency of the issuer. <strong>The</strong> agency’s view about the likelihood of such an event is<br />

expressed by the discontinuity factor (D-Factor). <strong>The</strong> Fitch Discontinuity Factor is a percentage between<br />

0% (perfect continuity of payments) and 100% (concomitant default of the issuer and the CB).<br />

— Cash Flow Modelling: Analyses the cash flows in combination with the sustainability of the assets provided<br />

as collateral to investors. In doing so, Fitch also takes into account the available or committed overcollateralisation.<br />

Assuming the issuer defaults, Fitch tests whether cash flows from the cover assets are<br />

sufficient to meet the payments due under the CB.<br />

— Recoveries given Default: After having determined the maximum rating a CB can reach on a probability<br />

of default basis (PD rating), Fitch additionally takes into account expected recoveries in its simulation<br />

runs. <strong>The</strong> rating scenarios tested go beyond the one corresponding to the PD rating level. Depending on<br />

the expected recoveries the rating of the CB can be lifted by two (or three) notches above the PD rating,<br />

subject to whether the PD rating is in the investment grade (‘BBB-’ and above) range or below.<br />

160<br />

As such, the analysis is split into two parts: On the one hand the D-Factor considers the systemic and issuer<br />

specific elements, while on the other hand a quantitative risk analysis is conducted. <strong>The</strong> D-Factor is computed<br />

as a weighted average score of the following four components:<br />

— Asset Segregation 45%<br />

— Liquidity Gaps 35%<br />

— Alternative Management 15%<br />

— Covered Bonds Oversight 5%<br />

Additionally the D-Factor can be adjusted for counterparty risks dependent on the sensitivity of the investors<br />

to these risks. <strong>The</strong> rating-dependent stress scenarios used in Fitch Ratings’ quantitative analysis assess<br />

whether the cover pool’s payments (including overcollateralisation) are sufficient to meet the scheduled payments<br />

to the CB holders. Important factors considered are the quality of the cover assets as well as interest,<br />

currency and maturity mismatches between assets and liabilities.<br />

Fitch Ratings’ covered bond methodology is consistently applied since 2007 and has been partially adjusted at<br />

times to reflect market developments. In 2010 / <strong>2011</strong> the following updates were implemented:<br />

— Counterparty Risks: In March <strong>2011</strong> Fitch published its covered bond specific counterparty criteria. This<br />

criteria, inter alia, describes the analysis of payment interruption risks potentially occurring after the issuer’s<br />

insolvency. For a full mitigation of these risks Fitch expects a reserve to cover at a minimum the amount of<br />

expected covered bond interest payments due over the next three months on a rolling basis. Fitch will also<br />

assess the collateralisation of derivatives taking the rating of the issuer into account and the replacement<br />

prospects. For derivatives with internal counterparties Fitch assesses the replacement prospect more critically.<br />

If the counterparty risks are not fully mitigated Fitch will assume a higher probability of default following an<br />

issuer’s default expressed through an increased D-Factor.<br />

— Analysis of commercial real estate: In January 2010 Fitch placed nine covered bond programmes with<br />

a significant amount of commercial real estate exposure in their cover pools and limited data availability<br />

for these assets on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). In the meantime their RWN were resolved for seven programmes.<br />

Following the more detailed pool analysis for all of these programmes the OC supporting the ratings<br />

has increased.<br />

Analytical Contacts:<br />

Rebecca Holter, Director, Covered Bonds CEE (rebecca.holter@fitchratings.com, Tel. +49 69 7680 76 261)<br />

Susanne Matern, Senior Director, Covered Bonds CEE (susanne.matern@fitchratings.com, Tel. +49 69 7680 76 237)<br />

Business & Relationship Development Contact:<br />

Andreas Wagenknecht, Director, (andreas.wagenknecht@fitchratings.com, Tel. +49 69 7680 76 235)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!