19.05.2014 Views

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Cardiopulmonary Bypass Technique to<br />

Physiologically Abate the Deleterious<br />

Effects of Gaseous Microemboli<br />

Kristina Schmidt, BS<br />

Carrie Whittaker, MPS, CCP, FFP<br />

David Holt, MA, CCT<br />

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Objectives<br />

• Background<br />

• Hypothesis<br />

• Materials<br />

• Methods<br />

• Results<br />

• Conclusion<br />

• Study Limitations<br />

• References


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Introduction<br />

• Neurocognitive impairment is a serious <strong>com</strong>plication of bypass and can be caused by<br />

gaseous or particulate emboli (1).<br />

• Possible neurologic <strong>com</strong>plications include stroke, <strong>com</strong>a, seizures, and memory<br />

impairment (2).<br />

• There are a plethera of ways for air to be introduced into the blood as it circulates<br />

through the perfusion circuit. Several include excessive suction, cavitation at turbulent<br />

regions of the circuit, mechanical jarring, and direct injection of gas by drug<br />

administration or other methods (3).<br />

• GME behavior within the extracorporeal circuit is multi-factorial. There is a <strong>com</strong>plex<br />

interrelationship between such factors as flow, gaseous partial pressure, volume,<br />

solubility, buoyancy, perfusate, temperature, fluid viscosity, and ECC circuit design (19).


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

http://static.howstuffworks.<strong>com</strong>/gif/define-pulmonary-embolism-1.jpg<br />

http://www.sciencedaily.<strong>com</strong>/images/2006/07/060721195718.jpg


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Introduction<br />

• Hyperoxia refers to using supraphysiologic levels of oxygen (21).<br />

• One of the reasons that perfusionists use hyperoxia is to prevent against the<br />

delivery of insoluble nitrogen bubbles to the body from the bypass circuit to<br />

the patient (5).<br />

• Running higher FiO 2 levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) increases<br />

the partial pressure of oxygen in the blood, in turn reducing the partial<br />

pressure of nitrogen.<br />

• Alteration of the <strong>com</strong>position of gaseous microbubbles through the use of<br />

hyperoxia can help to prevent the delivery of nitrogenous bubbles to the<br />

patient.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Henry’s Law<br />

At a constant temperature, the amount of a given gas<br />

dissolved in a given type and volume of liquid is directly<br />

proportional to the partial pressure of that gas in equilibrium<br />

with that liquid (13).


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Hypothesis<br />

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that hyperoxia<br />

can be a protective mechanism during CPB, due to the<br />

saturation of GME with easily absorbed and more soluble<br />

oxygen, by varying FiO 2 delivery to affect the solution’s<br />

partial pressures of oxygen and subsequently nitrogen.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Materials<br />

• 250 cc 0.9% sodium chloride injection<br />

• Cincinnati Sub-Zero Hemotherm cooler/heater, Model 400MR<br />

• BioMedicus centrifugal pump, Model 540<br />

• Terumo Capiox SX25 Hollow Fiber Oxygenator<br />

• ½ inch tubing<br />

• BioMedicus centrifugal pump, Model 540<br />

• BioMedicus BioProbe transducer Model TXOP<br />

• BioMedicus centrifugal cone<br />

• Medtronic Minimax bag reservoir<br />

• Sechrist air-oxygen mixer<br />

• Tubing clamps<br />

• Monoject 3ml syringes<br />

• Temperature monitor and probe on a Stockert III heart lung machine<br />

• Bayer Rapid Point Blood-Gas Analysis


University of Nebraska Medical Center


University of Nebraska Medical Center


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Methods<br />

• Assembled and primed circuit with 250 cc NaCl.<br />

• Turned heater/cooler to 37 degrees C and attached temperature probe to<br />

oxygenator.<br />

• Set flow and sweep on a 1:1 ratio of 2 L/min.<br />

• Testing points were randomized for the following FiO 2 s: 21, 50, 60, 70, 80,<br />

90, and 100%.<br />

• After 20 minutes of recirculating at the desired FiO 2 , 1.5cc of fluid was<br />

withdrawn from the luer port on the top of the venous bag.<br />

• Blood-gas analysis to obtain the PO 2 of the sample.<br />

• Mathematical derivation of PN 2 and solubility of both gases.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Sample Size<br />

• The data for this experiment was collected via a series of 21 separate runs<br />

using 7 different levels of FiO 2 with 3 runs at each level.<br />

• Conducting three tests at each level of FiO 2 was sufficient. The positive<br />

association seen in the initial pilot trial was strong and doing 3 tests at each<br />

level helped to provide an estimate of test variability at each level and<br />

helped to minimize Type II errors.<br />

• The order of the runs was randomized to minimize any random interference<br />

that could be related to the ordering (see next slide).


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Randomized numbering<br />

1st time through - 0.9 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.21 0.8 0.5<br />

2nd time through - 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.21 0.8<br />

3rd time through - 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.21 0.6 1.0


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Calculating Solubility<br />

• Air: 78% N 2 , 21% O 2<br />

• At 37 degrees C and 1atm (14)…<br />

N 2 solubility= .015 ml/mmHg/L<br />

O 2 solubility= .030 ml/mmHg/L<br />

http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/im<br />

ages/50_<strong>com</strong>position_of_the_earth.gif


University of Nebraska Medical Center


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Calculating Solubility<br />

• The solubility of O 2 (in ml/L) was calculated with the following<br />

equation:<br />

= (PO 2 mmHg)(.03 ml/mmHg/L)<br />

• The solubility of N 2 (in ml/L) was calculated with the following<br />

equation:<br />

=(740 mmHg - PO 2 mmHg)(.015 ml/mmHg/L)<br />

…where 740 mmHg was the atmospheric pressure in Kansas City<br />

on the day of the experiment.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Assumptions<br />

• It was assumed that the resulting partial pressure of oxygen would increase<br />

linearly as the level of FiO 2 used in the hyperoxia process was increased.<br />

• A linear increase was also assumed for the solubility of oxygen while a linear<br />

decrease was assumed for the solubility of nitrogen.<br />

• As the solubility of oxygen and nitrogen are linear functions of the partial<br />

pressure of oxygen for a given temperature and atmospheric pressure, if any<br />

one of these three assumptions is correct, then all must be correct.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Table 1<br />

FiO 2<br />

Baseline 0.21 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0<br />

PO 2 (mmHg)<br />

Trial 1 174.3 243.0 303.8 374.4 396.9 422.5 569.5 675.8<br />

Trial 2 170.2 253.7 300.5 377.2 411.8 432.8 583.6 659.0<br />

Trial 3 173.2 237.0 289.7 365.4 399.2 439.2 579.9 661.6<br />

Mean (sd) 172.6 (2.1) 244.6 (8.5) 298 (7.4) 372.3 (6.2) 402.6 (8) 431.5 (8.4) 577.7 (7.3) 665.5 (9)<br />

Solubility O 2 (ml/L)<br />

Trial 1 5.23 7.29 9.11 11.23 11.91 12.68 17.09 20.27<br />

Trial 2 5.11 7.61 9.02 11.32 12.35 12.98 17.51 19.77<br />

Trial 3 5.20 7.11 8.69 10.96 11.98 13.18 17.40 19.85<br />

Mean (sd) 5.18 (0.06) 7.34 (0.25) 8.94 (0.22) 11.17 (0.18) 12.08 (0.24) 12.95 (0.25) 17.33 (0.22) 19.96 (0.27)<br />

Solubility N 2 (ml/L)<br />

Trial 1 8.49 7.46 6.54 5.48 5.15 4.76 2.56 0.96<br />

Trial 2 8.55 7.29 6.59 5.44 4.92 4.61 2.35 1.22<br />

Trial 3 8.50 7.55 6.75 5.62 5.11 4.51 2.40 1.18<br />

Mean (sd) 8.51 (0.03) 7.43 (0.13) 6.63 (0.11) 5.52 (0.09) 5.06 (0.12) 4.63 (0.13) 2.44 (0.11) 1.12 (0.14)


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Results<br />

• The measured PO 2 values increased proportionally to the FiO 2 values, and<br />

were used to calculate the solubility of both nitrogen and oxygen in the fluid.<br />

• The results demonstrated that the calculated solubility of oxygen increased<br />

from an FiO 2 of 21 to 100% (an average of 5.177 ml/L to 19.964 ml/L,<br />

respectively.)<br />

• In turn, the calculated solubility of nitrogen decreased with an increase in<br />

FiO 2 (8.5115 ml/L and 1.118 ml/L, respectively.)


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Measured Results: FiO 2 vs. PO 2<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

PO 2<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Trial 1<br />

Trial 2<br />

Trial 3<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />

FiO 2


Solubility O 2 (ml/L)<br />

University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Calculated Results: FiO 2 vs. Solubility of O 2<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Trial 1<br />

Trial 2<br />

Trial 3<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />

FiO 2


Solubility N 2 (ml/L)<br />

University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Calculated Results: FiO 2 vs. Solubility of N 2<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Trial 1<br />

Trial 2<br />

Trial 3<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2<br />

FiO 2


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

• An Ordinary Least Squares Regression (OLS Regression) was performed to<br />

test for an association between the FiO 2 level and the partial pressure of<br />

oxygen, solubility of oxygen, and solubility of nitrogen.<br />

• This regression results allow t-test analysis to determine if the coefficients in<br />

the model are significantly different from zero.<br />

• In each of the three regression models, the coefficient for the slope of the<br />

linear association between the FiO 2 level and each of the three out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

was significantly different from zero, suggesting that there is a relationship<br />

between the FiO 2 level and each of the three out<strong>com</strong>es.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Table 2: Linear Regression Results (N=21)<br />

Coefficient<br />

Estimates<br />

PO 2 (mmHg)<br />

Intercept<br />

(se)<br />

74.6<br />

(32.4)<br />

p-value<br />

0.03<br />

FiO 2<br />

(se)<br />

524.5<br />

(45.2)<br />

p-value<br />


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Discussion<br />

• This research experiment reinforced the accepted theory that PO 2<br />

will increase as FiO 2 increases.<br />

• The calculated data also showed a correlation that perhaps many<br />

perfusionists do not think of- the affect that FiO 2 has on the solubility<br />

of gases and GME.<br />

• Amidst the controversy of hyperoxia, the author of this study aimed<br />

to show how a high oxygen tension can be beneficial to patients in<br />

which GME are suspected.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Discussion<br />

• The authors do, however, recognize there are certain instances where 100% FiO 2 s<br />

should not be used.<br />

• Reperfusion injury occurs when antioxidants are deactivated during cellular acidosis<br />

from ischemia followed by capillary reperfusion with warm, oxygenated blood (16).<br />

• Many hospitals have changed their protocols to normoxic perfusion because of studies<br />

suggesting increased myocardial injury by free radicals during and after hyperoxia (8).<br />

• A high PO 2 after cross- clamp removal could result in increased generation of<br />

deleterious free radical species, but oxygen loading before any period of ischemia might<br />

negate that risk (21).


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Discussion<br />

• Another argument against the use of hyperoxia during surgery is that it may<br />

exacerbate retrolental fibroplasia.<br />

• This is caused by long-term exposure to elevated PaO 2 . It is typically due to<br />

prolonged ventilatory requirements of premature neonates and is not<br />

generally a concern in the time length of CPB.<br />

• In reality, a change to 100% FiO 2 will not drastically increase the amount of<br />

oxygen the patient receives.<br />

• The amount of oxygen available to the tissues that can cause reperfusion<br />

injury is much more dependent on the hemoglobin concentration than the<br />

sweep FiO 2 (6).


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Study Limitations<br />

• A non-blood prime was used.<br />

• In blood, bubbles be<strong>com</strong>e coated with protein, and this affects how<br />

bubbles move through solution.<br />

• In the future, a similar experiment should be done using blood to<br />

avoid any possible data corruption.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Study Limitations<br />

• Originally, the authors of this study had planned to conduct the<br />

experiment differently.<br />

• The initial methods involved injecting a bolus of room air, which is<br />

primarily <strong>com</strong>posed of nitrogen, into the venous bag reservoir.<br />

• The idea was to draw up the bubble into an oxygen analyzer to see<br />

if the bubble had changed its <strong>com</strong>position during hyperoxic<br />

circulation.<br />

http://www.fetamed.<strong>com</strong>/images/MiniOx_Oxygen_Analyzer.gif


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

Conclusion<br />

• While many perfusionists and surgeons consistently use a certain<br />

oxygenation strategy regardless of patient parameters, a high FiO 2<br />

may be beneficial when it <strong>com</strong>es to fighting air emboli.<br />

• This study focused on hyperoxia and its direct effect on preventing<br />

the harmful consequences of GME. Further research is needed to<br />

study hyperoxia’s effects on this topic, as well as the other benefits<br />

or possible deleterious effects this gas strategy may have.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

References<br />

1. Gaseous Micro Emboli: Concepts and Considerations. Butler, BD. 2006, JECT, Vol. 38, pp. 271-279.<br />

2. An In Vitro Study of the Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Flushing of Arterial Line Filters. Beckman, R., Gisner, C.,<br />

Evans, E. JECT, Vol. 41, pp. 161-165.<br />

3. Attenuation of Neurologic Injury During Cardiac Surgery. Murkin, JM. 2001, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 72, pp.<br />

1838-34.<br />

4. Clinically silent cerebral ischemic events after cardiac surgery: their incidence, regional vascular occurrence, and<br />

procedural dependence. Floyd TF, Shah PN, Price CC, et al. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 81, pp.<br />

2160-6.<br />

5. Gas embolism: pathophysiology and treatment. Van Hulst RA, Klein J, Lachmann B. 2003, Clin Physiol Funct<br />

Imaging, pp. 26-237.<br />

6. Gaseous Microemboli and Hyperoxia. Grist, G. 2006, JECT, pp. 367-369.<br />

7. Solubility. Bookrags. [Online] 2005. [Cited: December 6, 2009.] http://www.bookrags.<strong>com</strong>/research/solubility-woc/.<br />

8. Oxygenation Strategy and Neurologic Damage After Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest. II. Hypoxic Versus Free<br />

Radical Injury. Nollert, G., et al. 1999, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, pp. 1172-1179.<br />

9. Whittaker, C. Email correspondence. 2008.<br />

10. Gaseous Microemboli and the Influence of Microporous Membrane Oxygenators. Weitkemper, H., Oppermann, B.,<br />

Spilker, A., Knobl, H., Reiner, K. 2005, JECT, pp. 256-264.


University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />

11. The Theoretical Prediction of Safe Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (DHCA) Time Using Estimated Tissue<br />

Oxygen Loading. Whittaker, C., Grist, G. 2008, Progess in Pediatric Cardiology, pp. 117-122.<br />

12. Postoperative Management of Cerebral Air Embolism: Gas Physiology For Surgeons. Tovar EA., Del Campo C.,<br />

Borsari A., et al. 1995, Annals of Thoracic Surgery, pp. 1138-1142.<br />

13. Pauling, Linus. General Chemistry. s.l. : Dover Publications, 1988.<br />

14. Durrant, Philip John. General and Inorganic Chemistry. 1939, p. 168.<br />

15. Commerce, U.S. Department of. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Weather Service.<br />

[Online] October 5, 2009. http://www.nws.noaa.gov.<br />

16. Myocardial Reperfusion Injury: Etiology, Mechanisms, and Therapies. Hoffman Jr JW., Gilbert TB., Poston RS.,<br />

Silldorff EP. 2004, JECT, pp. 391-411.<br />

17. Normoxia vs. Hyperoxia: Impact of Oxygen Tension Strategies on Out<strong>com</strong>es for Patients Receiving Cardiopulmonary<br />

Bypass for Routine Cardiac Surgical Repair. Brown, M., Holt, D., Edwards, J., Burnett, R. 2006, JECT, pp.<br />

241-248.<br />

18. Wallace, O. What is Retrolental Fibroplasia. Wise Geek. [Online] 2009. [Cited: March 30, 2009.]<br />

http://www.wisegeek.<strong>com</strong>/what-is-retrolental-fibroplasia.htm.<br />

19. Emboli Generation by the Medtronic Maxima Hardshell Adult Venous Reservoir in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits:<br />

A Preliminary Report. Mitchell, S. J., Wilcox, T., McDougal, C., Gorman, D. F. 1996, <strong>Perfusion</strong>, Vol. 11, pp.<br />

145-155.<br />

20. Air Solubility in Water. Engineering Tool Box. [Online] 2005. [Cited: December 6, 2009.]<br />

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.<strong>com</strong>/gases-solubility-water-d_1148.html.<br />

21. Effects of Hyperoxia on Neonatal Myocardial Energy Status and Response to Global Ischemia. Wittnich, C., Torrance, S., Carlyle,<br />

C. 2000, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, pp. 2125-31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!