19.05.2014 Views

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

PowerPoint Presentation (PDF) - Perfusion.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Department of Pathology,<br />

University of Pittsburgh<br />

Does the RBC storage lesion<br />

matter clinically?<br />

Mark Yazer, MD FRCPC


History of RBC storage<br />

• RBCs were initially stored in citrate at room temperature<br />

• Lasted for only a few days<br />

• In the refrigerator they lasted a bit longer<br />

• In the 1940s glucose was added to the RBCs along with citrate<br />

• 21 day expiration<br />

• In North America RBCs are stored in an adenine rich solution for<br />

up to 42 days


The RBC storage lesion<br />

• As RBCs are stored ex vivo they undergo changes<br />

• These include metabolic and shape changes<br />

• Collectively they are known as the storage lesion


How has the RBC storage lesion been studied?<br />

• 3 types of studies evaluating the RBC storage lesion:<br />

• In vitro, biochemical studies<br />

• In vivo, physiological studies without patient<br />

out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• Retrospective studies of recipient morbidity and<br />

mortality


How has the RBC storage lesion been studied?<br />

• 3 types of studies evaluating the RBC storage lesion:<br />

• In vitro, biochemical studies<br />

‣ Have elucidated the changes in RBC<br />

metabolism and shape during storage<br />

• In vivo, physiological studies without patient<br />

out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• Retrospective studies of morbidity and mortality


Decrease in 2,3-DPG<br />

• Hb is a tetramer of 4 proteins each containing a heme unit<br />

• 2,3-diphosphoglycerate is a small molecule that binds into the<br />

Hb tetramer<br />

• 2,3-DPG promotes oxygen offloading in hypoxic areas


Decrease in 2,3-DPG<br />

• 2,3-DPG is depleted during storage<br />

• Its decline is mirrored by an increase in Hb oxygen<br />

saturation<br />

• 2,3-DPG is restored 24-72 hours after transfusion<br />

Bennett-Guerrero et al. PNAS, 2007


k on , oxygen binding rate constant, increases after day 14<br />

Gelderman MP et al. Transfusion Medicine in press


k off , oxygen off loading rate constant, does not change<br />

Gelderman MP et al. Transfusion Medicine in press


RBC shape change<br />

• Stored RBCs undergo shape changes<br />

• Normal morphology is maintained until severe drops in<br />

intracellular ATP occur<br />

Red Cell Shape, Bessis M, Weed RI, Leblond PF, 1973


Other biochemical/membrane changes<br />

• Altered NO metabolism<br />

• Increased aggregability<br />

• Increased adhesion to endothelial cells<br />

• Increases in RBC membrane sublethal injury (MFI)<br />

• Membrane vesiculation<br />

• Paralysis of Na/K ATPase<br />

• Reduced membrane deformability<br />

• Altered membrane protein/lipid <strong>com</strong>position


Conclusions on in vitro, biochemical studies<br />

• These are essential studies to understand the basic<br />

changes in the RBCs during storage<br />

• They define the biological elements of the storage<br />

lesion<br />

• Major limitation:<br />

• Should be interpreted only as defining a biological<br />

constellation of changes to RBCs during storage<br />

• Not intended to predict recipient out<strong>com</strong>es to<br />

transfusion


How has the RBC storage lesion been studied?<br />

• 3 types of studies evaluating the RBC storage lesion:<br />

• In vitro, biochemical studies<br />

• In vivo, physiological studies without patient<br />

out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

‣ Evaluate changes in recipient’s physiological<br />

parameters only<br />

• Retrospective studies of morbidity and mortality


Analysis of tissue oxygenation<br />

• Study evaluated changes in tissue oxygenation after transfusion<br />

• Used Near Infrared Spectroscopy with sensor mounted on<br />

thumb<br />

• Does receipt of RBCs ≥21 days affect oxygenation?<br />

Kiraly LN et al. J Trauma 2009


Analysis of tissue oxygenation<br />

• Patient undergoing active resuscitation, sepsis, requiring<br />

vasopressor support excluded<br />

60<br />

minutes<br />

Transfusion<br />

Baseline<br />

Transfusion starts<br />

Transfusion<br />

4 hours posttransfusion<br />

Endtransfusion<br />

-60<br />

0 100 160<br />

60


Analysis of tissue oxygenation<br />

•Small numbers of patients in this study<br />

• Limited demographics<br />

• How many units were transfused in the 2 groups?<br />

Ages of the transfused RBCs?<br />

Kiraly LN et al. J Trauma 2009


Analysis of tissue oxygenation<br />

• Significant decrease in StO 2 during transfusion period in Old<br />

group<br />

• “This drop trended toward significance after the end of<br />

transfusion (p=0.06)”<br />

Baseline<br />

Transfusion<br />

Patient<br />

status?<br />

4 hours post transfusion<br />

Kiraly LN et al. J Trauma 2009


Analysis of tissue oxygenation<br />

• Age of the single oldest unit of RBCs<br />

• R = 0.5 (p < 0.05)<br />

• A modest correlation, at best<br />

Kiraly LN et al. J Trauma 2009


Conclusions<br />

• No clinical out<strong>com</strong>es reported<br />

• Did the apparently transient decrease in StO 2 impact<br />

morbidity or mortality?<br />

• Does StO 2 in the thumb reflect that in other tissues?<br />

• Limited demographic/RBC data reported<br />

• Although this study involved patients, its findings are no<br />

more clinically relevant than in vitro studies


Conclusions on in vitro, physiological studies<br />

• Like in vitro biochemical studies, these define<br />

physiological parameters in actual recipients<br />

• Involve actual human/primate recipients<br />

• Major limitation:<br />

• If they do not measure clinical out<strong>com</strong>es, the data<br />

cannot be used to predict out<strong>com</strong>es in actual recipients<br />

• Contribute towards the basic science knowledge base of<br />

the storage lesion, not its clinical effects (if any)


Schieẞ ein Tor…


How has the RBC storage lesion been studied?<br />

• 3 types of studies evaluating the RBC storage lesion:<br />

• In vitro, biochemical studies<br />

• In vivo, physiological studies without patient<br />

out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• Retrospective studies of morbidity and mortality<br />

‣ Review recipient’s charts after transfusion for<br />

morbidity and mortality information


Retrospective studies - Pro<br />

• Retrospective studies are easier to get past IRB than RCT<br />

• Data already exists, it just needs to be mined<br />

• Can feature enormous numbers of patients as consent is<br />

not usually required<br />

• Good for generating hypotheses


Retrospective studies - Con<br />

• If <strong>com</strong>paring an intervention, must ensure 2 groups are<br />

identical<br />

• Otherwise results could be due to confounders<br />

• Very hard to account for confounding variables<br />

• Demographics of groups must be presented<br />

• Often require <strong>com</strong>plicated statistics to show a result


Remember…<br />

• # RBCs transfused is highly correlated to age of RBCs<br />

• Sicker patients receive more RBC transfusions<br />

• Thus sicker patients tend to get older RBCs<br />

• Sicker patients have worse out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• So is an unfavorable out<strong>com</strong>e due to the patients’ natural<br />

history or receipt of older RBCs?


Koch et al. NEJM 2008<br />

Large, retrospective study on age of RBCs in cardiac surgery<br />

patients<br />

• A large study of CABG or valve surgery patients was performed<br />

• RBC age: ≤ 14 days vs. >14 days<br />

• Patients who received a mix of “fresher” and “older” blood were<br />

excluded<br />

• Composite endpoint:


Koch et al. NEJM 2008<br />

Both groups of patients received median 2 RBC units<br />

• 2872 patients in Newer group, 3130 patients in Older group<br />

• Same median number of RBCs transfused: 2<br />

• Newer RBCs were median 11 days, Older RBCs were 20 days<br />

50%


Koch et al. NEJM 2008<br />

Matching of cohorts was not perfect<br />

• NYHA grades differed significantly between the 2 groups<br />

• Significant differences in ABO groups of RBCs


Out<strong>com</strong>e measures were broad and not easily explicable by RBC<br />

transfusion<br />

Dichotomous variable<br />

Koch et al. NEJM 2008


Koch et al. NEJM 2008<br />

Greater mortality amongst recipients of median 2 RBC units<br />

92.6%<br />

92.6%<br />

Increased LV dysfunction<br />

Increased MV regurgitation<br />

89.0% (p


Conclusions<br />

• Mortality end points are very broad<br />

• Actual causes of death not presented<br />

• Death caused by being run over by a bus after receiving RBCs<br />

would appear as related to the transfusion<br />

• Authors offer no specific mechanism linking “older” blood to<br />

negative out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• Authors do not propose changing the current RBC issuing practice<br />

• Large study, hypothesis generator


Another retrospective study of mortality and the storage lesion<br />

• The largest retrospective study to date<br />

• Analyzed database containing Swedish and Danish<br />

transfusion recipients from 1995-2002<br />

• Inclusion criteria:<br />

• Ages 15 – 90<br />

• No tx 2 years prior to index transfusion<br />

• Exclusion criteria:<br />

• Receipt of autologous RBCs<br />

• Receipt of ABO non-identical units<br />

• Receipt of RBCs of unknown ABO group/age<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Another retrospective study of mortality and the storage lesion<br />

• Patients were generally surgery or trauma patients<br />

• Divided into 4 groups based on RBC age<br />

• 0-9 days old<br />

• 10-19 days old<br />

• 20-29 days old<br />

• 20-42 days old<br />

• Mixed<br />

• The reference group of recipients was the 10-19 day<br />

old RBC group<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Mortality assessed over 2 periods<br />

• Short term survival (404,959 tx, 387,130 patients):<br />

• Transfused on day 1 and followed for 7 days<br />

• Long term survival (380,549 tx, 364,037 patients):<br />

• Transfused between days 1-7 and followed from day 8<br />

through 2 years<br />

• Surveillance also terminated upon death, emigration<br />

and end of study period (31 Dec 2002)<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Koch et al.<br />

10 km


Scandinavian study<br />

Cleveland<br />

650 km


Patient demographics<br />

• The recipients were well matched between the 5<br />

groups<br />

• Matched for age, gender, ABO, LOS, number of RBCs,<br />

indications for transfusion<br />

• Median storage ages:<br />

• 0-9 days: 7 (5-8)<br />

• 10-19 days: 14 (12-16)<br />

• 20-29 days: 23 (21-26)<br />

• 30-42 days: 34 (31-37)<br />

• Mixed: 17 (11-22)<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Mortality out<strong>com</strong>es<br />

• Mortality not increased amongst recipients of oldest RBCs who<br />

were ≥70 years, or CABG, or ECMO<br />

• Leukoreduction did not affect survival<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Causes of mortality<br />

• Compared recipients of 30-42 days old to 10-19 days old<br />

• No single cause of death predominated<br />

Day 1-7 Day 8-730<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010


Chicken and egg…<br />

• The number of 30-42 day old units received did not influence<br />

mortality<br />

?<br />

Edgren G et al. Transfusion 2010; Middelburg RA et al. Transfusion 2010


Another retrospective study of mortality and the storage lesion<br />

• The largest, by far, study to date<br />

• Well matched patient demographics<br />

• Was the 5% increase in mortality causally related to<br />

RBC transfusion?<br />

• 5% increase in mortality surprisingly stable over time<br />

• No single cause of death predominated<br />

• No dose response relationship<br />

• How to explain the result in the mixed group?<br />

• Seems related to underlying disease, not RBC<br />

• Would have been nice to have seen morbidity data


Conclusions on retrospective studies<br />

• Hypothesis generating<br />

• Major limitation:<br />

• Lack of randomization<br />

• Various types of confounding<br />

• Inadequate matching of groups can bias results<br />

• NOT hypothesis proving


RECESS study<br />

2 prospective randomized trials are <strong>com</strong>ing!<br />

• Cardiac surgery patients<br />

• ≤ 10 day RBC vs. ≥ 21 day old LR RBC<br />

• Primary out<strong>com</strong>e:Multiple organ dysfunction score on POD 7<br />

• ~1832 patients<br />

ABLE study<br />

• ICU patients<br />

• RBC storage length ≤ 7 days vs. standard issue LR RBCs<br />

• Primary out<strong>com</strong>e: 90-day all cause mortality<br />

• 2510 patients


• The storage lesion is real!<br />

Conclusions<br />

• The clinical data has by no means proven that its effects<br />

are detrimental to recipients<br />

• What should be done about how the BB currently issues<br />

RBCs?<br />

אין דבר<br />

33ff.<strong>com</strong>/flags

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!