19.05.2014 Views

Commander's Corner - PEO STRI - U.S. Army

Commander's Corner - PEO STRI - U.S. Army

Commander's Corner - PEO STRI - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com | March 2011<br />

PRSRT STD<br />

U.S. Postage<br />

PAID<br />

Lebanon Junction, KY<br />

Permit #701<br />

Commander’s<br />

<strong>Corner</strong><br />

MG Robert B. Brown<br />

Commanding General<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Maneuver Center of Excellence<br />

Fort Benning, GA<br />

Armor Evolution Tracked Amphibs STPE-I AEDC HULC<br />

Integrated ISR/JMRC Talon <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> AFMC


TEAheadsets.com<br />

Tactical Headsets and Push-to-Talks<br />

In the most extreme environments you’ll be able to say...<br />

I heard you the first time...®<br />

We offer multiple headset technologies<br />

In-Ear<br />

Bone Mic<br />

Dual Ear<br />

Boom Mic<br />

Throat<br />

Mic<br />

Single Ear<br />

Boom Mic<br />

30 Day Evaluation Program<br />

California (310) 457-7401<br />

New York (845) 278-0960<br />

Texas (469) 362-0121<br />

Setting the standard<br />

for over 40 years<br />

www.TEAheadsets.com


Credit:DoD Photo<br />

Armor & Mobility<br />

March 2011<br />

Contents<br />

Departments<br />

Evolution of Armor in Modern Combat<br />

By Joe Talley<br />

26<br />

BRAC Spotlight<br />

4<br />

The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq has influenced major change in the<br />

design and deployment of U.S. armor continuing through the firstever<br />

deployment of U.S. tanks in Afghanistan.<br />

Modern Tracked Amphibs:<br />

Role in USMC Operations<br />

By Lt. Gen. George Flynn<br />

As DoD continues to weigh the need for combined sea and land<br />

28<br />

30<br />

34<br />

FutureTech<br />

Asymmetric Warfare Developments<br />

Mission: Enemy Misfire<br />

Unmanned & Beyond<br />

9<br />

capable transport vehicles in current and future USMC ops, one<br />

former MCCDC leader gives a resounding “YES”.<br />

40<br />

Ad/Index/Calendar<br />

11<br />

Camp Armordillo: Sustaining Mission Success<br />

By Belinda Lee, RRAD PAO<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Camp Armordillo, Iraq is DoD’s key command facility for<br />

the housing of stored theater-provided equipment in Iraq (STPE-I), a<br />

critical source of supply for Afghan ops.<br />

20<br />

HULC: Lightening<br />

the Load<br />

By James Ni<br />

The latest in robotic exoskeleton<br />

technology provides soldiers with<br />

load-carrying relief.<br />

16<br />

Integrated ISR: JMRC Supports Joint Ops<br />

By Casey Bain and Marie La Touche<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> 170th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) has just<br />

completed Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) training<br />

in preparation for enhanced ISR asset integration during joint and<br />

coalition ops in Afghanistan.<br />

22<br />

Strategic Leadership<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong><br />

By PAO <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong><br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> is<br />

providing responsive<br />

simulation, training and testing.<br />

21<br />

AEDC: Extending Air Asset Life<br />

By Phillip Lorenz III<br />

The U.S. Air Force is testing the limits of its F100-PW-229 engine,<br />

powering the F-15 Eagle and F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter jet aircraft,<br />

in an effort to achieve greater cycles between overhauls.<br />

31<br />

Rugged on the Move:<br />

Tactical ATVs<br />

By Kevin Hunter<br />

Remote-access ATVs are<br />

providing critical mobility solutions<br />

for warfighters.<br />

13<br />

Commander’s <strong>Corner</strong><br />

MG Robert B. Brown<br />

Commanding General<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Maneuver Center of Excellence<br />

Ft. Benning, GA<br />

35<br />

Emerging Forecast:<br />

AFMC<br />

By AFMC PAO<br />

U.S. Air Force Materiel<br />

Command conducts R&D,<br />

test and evaluation, providing<br />

acquisition management and<br />

logistics support.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 1


Insights<br />

Bi-Monthly Publication<br />

As DoD prepares for the redeployment of joint forces supporting U.S. Central Command,<br />

greater focus is on the equipment and mobility platforms being redeployed from Iraq.<br />

Much of this mission materiel once critical to operations there is in a continual cycle of<br />

reset and re-fielding from depot-level overhaul to re-issue at staging points such as Camp<br />

Armordillo, Baghdad, Iraq. Though no longer needed in one theater, these assets remain<br />

vital to the Afghanistan mission.<br />

Bi-Annual Publication<br />

Quarterly Publication<br />

In the March issue of A&M, readers are immersed in the world of the warfighter, DoD’s<br />

most valued weapon. From the evolution of armor design and deployment to brigade<br />

combat team (BCT) integrated ISR training, an emphasis on force coordination is the order<br />

of the day. In an exclusive interview with Major General Robert Brown, Commander, U.S.<br />

<strong>Army</strong> Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE), Ft. Benning, GA, Gen. Brown speaks to the<br />

new role that a combined armor and infantry center will have in shaping the future of the<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s mission. From a Marine Corps perspective, Lt. Gen. George Flynn (USMC-Ret.),<br />

offers his insights into the continued importance of tracked amphibious platforms.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

Tel: 301-974-9792<br />

Fax: 443-637-3714<br />

Leisure World Plaza<br />

P. O. Box 12115<br />

Silver Spring, MD 20908<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

Home of DoD<br />

Annual Source Books<br />

From an Air Force viewpoint, A&M offers readers a perspective on engineering<br />

enhancements to F-15/16 engine propulsion capacity currently under testing. In this<br />

month’s Emerging Forecast, a profiled look at the U.S. Air Force Materiel Command<br />

provides readers a close up of one of the world’s top organizations for the development,<br />

test and evaluation of military air assets. The BRAC Spotlight column highlights Ft. Carson<br />

and the 2nd Brigade 2nd Infantry redeployment home while Unmanned & Beyond looks<br />

at the <strong>Army</strong>’s TALON robotic vehicle program as a critical component for future MRAP<br />

operations.<br />

As always, feel free to email me with any questions or concerns. Thanks for your<br />

readership!<br />

Kevin Hunter<br />

Editor, Armor & Mobility<br />

Tactical Defense Media<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

301-974-9792<br />

First Tanks - Evolution of Armor Sends<br />

U.S. Tanks to Afghanistan<br />

In the first of a series, A&M offers readers a look at the<br />

evolution of armor in Afghanistan and the decision to send in<br />

the first U.S. tanks- Marine Corps’ Delta Company, 1st Tank<br />

Battalion.<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

2 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


VMR Electronics provides Custom Cable Solutions for<br />

Critical Applications<br />

High Speed Signal and Data Cables • EMI/EMP Filtered RESCU Cables<br />

Waterproof Cables • Power Cables • Flat Flexible Cables • Molded Cables<br />

Coax: Iditarod ® Antenna Cables, Phase Matched Coax Cables, Semi-Rigid<br />

Formed Coax Cables • Wire Harness Cables • Fiber Optic Cables<br />

• Military Vehicle Experience<br />

• Engineering Capability<br />

• Reverse Engineering<br />

• Highest Quality Performance in<br />

the Cable industry<br />

• High end testing<br />

• High Volume capability, extremely<br />

lean with highly automated<br />

assembly lines<br />

• 208,000+ square foot capacity in<br />

three facilities and expanding<br />

• Design solutions for critical EMI,<br />

waterproof, high and low temp,<br />

EMP and chemical protection<br />

• IDITAROD ® high power, extreme<br />

low loss cables. Patent pending<br />

• Full drawings for all applications<br />

Complex Harness Solutions<br />

Our customers include: General Dynamics • BAE Systems • Lockheed Martin Tier One •DRS Technologies<br />

Raytheon • Sikorsky • Syracuse Research • L3 Communications • US <strong>Army</strong> Ft. Monmouth • Oshkosk • Textron • ITT<br />

AS9100 certified • ISO9001:2008 • IPC training to IPC WHMA-A-620 Class 3<br />

Cage Code 1YF27 • HUB Zone certified • Women owned<br />

Application Engineering, Prototyping and Full Scale Production.<br />

100 Eldredge Street, Binghamton, NY 13901 • Phone: 607-748-7556 • Fax: 607-748-7824<br />

Email: sales@vmrelectronics.com • Website: www.vmrelectronics.com


Evolution of Armor<br />

in Modern Combat<br />

By Joe Talley, Independent Security Consultant<br />

©2003 B Sean Fairburn<br />

4 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


March 2003: Kirkuk, Iraq- Coalition forces are barred from entering Northern Iraq<br />

through Turkey. Special Forces must now negotiate with Kurdish rebel leaders to persuade<br />

them to join the assault on Kirkuk and to help secure Northern Iraq. There is an obstacle,<br />

though- the Kurds are wary of partnering with coalition forces, given previous failures on<br />

their part to support the Kurds since the end of the Gulf War some 10 years earlier. They<br />

need a guarantee that the coalition will fully commit to the fight at H-Hour. That guarantee<br />

comes in the form of a battalion of US <strong>Army</strong> M1A1 tanks deployed from Germany on<br />

C-17s to support the attack. Soon after, Kirkuk falls to Kurdish and coalition forces to open<br />

the Northern Front in the War in Iraq.<br />

Far to the south, another group of tanks enters Iraq from the deserts of Kuwait. Marine<br />

forces, led by Delta Company, 1st Tank Battalion, US Marine Corps, would have it a little<br />

tougher, though- the Marines depart on a challenging journey north, including extensive<br />

fighting through formidable battles in Basrah, Numaniyah, Salman Pak, and eventually to<br />

the heart of Baghdad.<br />

That push to Baghdad represents the beginning of a revolution in the design and<br />

deployment of US armor that continues to today- through the first-ever deployment of US<br />

tanks in Afghanistan, to the desert of Helmand Province. The decision behind recently<br />

introducing a US Marine Corps tank company to the Afghan War represents the result of<br />

an evolution in the approach to modern armored warfare as a culmination of advances<br />

in materials, technology, and combat experience since the first American armored forces<br />

crossed the border into Iraq in Spring 2003.<br />

Training Ground for the Counterinsurgency Fight<br />

Even before the initial invasion, the military had repeatedly pushed for a transformation<br />

of forces to prepare itself for any number of contingencies and future battlefields. Within<br />

this context, it is important to understand the impact of the changes that have occurred in<br />

armored combat since 2003.<br />

Back then, a young tank company commander by the name of Captain Greg Poland<br />

led his Marine tanks through a series of dangerous battles as they fought their way across<br />

Iraq against both Soviet tanks and Saddam Fedayeen fighters. All of this was but training<br />

for some of the most challenging fighting to come.<br />

“I do not believe that the ‘success’ of Delta Company in 2003 during the March to<br />

Baghdad was necessarily unique”, says Greg. “We were simply a lucky group of Marines<br />

who were called upon to demonstrate our training and combat skills in actual combat.” He<br />

cautions though, “As a community, Tankers in the Marine Corps have learned hard lessons<br />

in Iraq since 2003, adapting to an emerging and evolving counterinsurgency” and having<br />

to evolve as warriors where “learning about your enemy and modifying your operations to<br />

defeat that enemy remains a constant over time.”<br />

While the warrior has evolved, his combat experiences have reinforced the need for<br />

technological improvements to the core M1 Abrams platform. By 2005, the US military<br />

began adding a package of components to its tanks called the TUSK, or ‘Tank Urban Survival<br />

Kit’. <strong>Army</strong> tanks benefitted from extra belly armor and additional reactive side armor and<br />

skirts to protect the track wheels. While now-Lieutenant Colonel Poland says the Marine<br />

leadership chose not to add the protective skirts to their tanks, all M1A1s with the TUSK<br />

package would eventually receive key components such as the CWS or Commander’s<br />

Remote Weapon Station, which allows the tank commander to independently scan for<br />

and engage secondary targets while the gunner identifies and engages the primary ones,<br />

and other additions such as armored shields to the commander’s position. Now, the TC<br />

does not have to expose himself when remotely firing the additional .50 caliber machine<br />

gun provided as part of the system. Finally, an important component of the TUSK package<br />

is the reinforced, Counter-IED Driver’s Seat, to further protect the driver from IED blasts.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 5


Taking Back Ramadi<br />

Then-<strong>Army</strong> Captain Tim Ferguson and his Warlord Company of<br />

18 M1A1 tanks didn’t have those add-ons yet, though, when they<br />

arrived in Ramadi, Iraq in 2006. His company, Charlie Co. 2-37<br />

Armor served as the sole tank company assigned to secure and<br />

hold the eastern side of Ramadi at the height of the 1st Brigade,<br />

1st Armored Division’s campaign to take back that city from the<br />

enemy. For Tim, early experiences taught him to always keep the<br />

tank’s front armor towards the enemy, but now it was a 360-degree<br />

enemy that one had to be constantly aware of. “Add in all the<br />

rest of a proper COIN campaign and the tank commander was a<br />

very busy guy.” Tim’s unit provides a comparative example to the<br />

current lone company deployment of tanks to Afghanistan.<br />

“The tank system today has matured to meet that threat we<br />

faced in Ramadi. The bones of it are the same, but the Abrams is<br />

now a completely different animal, more tailored to the environment<br />

and threat it will be dealing with in the future”, he said. When<br />

they deployed from Germany, they had yet to receive the TUSK<br />

packages and had only the standard M1A1 AIM (Abrams Integrated<br />

Management Overhaul Program) variants.<br />

Tim remembers hearing about the TUSK program and how<br />

significant it was for the armor community. Again, looking at the<br />

pictures, even some of the more minor additions to the tank have<br />

revolutionized its capabilities.<br />

“For years, <strong>Army</strong> units complained that they didn’t have the<br />

infantryman’s phone on the back of their tanks. In Ramadi, it<br />

would have been particularly useful to have them as we regularly<br />

responded to other units to include the Marine infantry battalion<br />

next door. It is much easier to grab a phone then worry about<br />

communication problems between units, trying to get on the same<br />

frequencies, etc.”<br />

“At the time, the guy on the ground would have to climb up<br />

onto the tank, or the commander would have to climb down, and<br />

in either case you are exposed to enemy fire. Then they would still<br />

have to yell over the sound of the engine to communicate face-toface.<br />

With the infantryman’s phone, the soldier would just grab the<br />

phone and talk directly to the crew- able to warn the tank about<br />

obstacles, identify a hidden enemy, ask for medical assistance<br />

if necessary, or more importantly, talk through the disposition of<br />

friendly forces in the area. Situational awareness is key and any tool<br />

that is simple and can add to that is a good thing.”<br />

Back then, Tim’s primary optic for the .50 caliber machine<br />

gun was the small daylight periscope – he didn’t have the TUSK’s<br />

thermal day and night system- which limited their ability to detect<br />

and engage targets with that weapon system. Even in 2007,<br />

when his company was replaced by C Co., 3-69 Armor from the<br />

3rd Infantry Division, he believes that this follow-on unit had yet to<br />

receive the Thermal Viewers as well.<br />

In reviewing the available pictures of the Marine M1A1s currently<br />

deployed to Afghanistan, Tim points out the Thermal Camera<br />

Viewer that can be seen on the front of each tank, as part of the<br />

CWS. This thermal site allows the commander to operate this<br />

system from inside the tank – giving him day and night, all-weather<br />

targeting and identification ability without exposing him to the<br />

constant sniper threat.<br />

Small Box over the right track is the infantryman’s phone (U.S. <strong>Army</strong> photo)<br />

Some of the most critical components of the TUSK package<br />

could not come soon enough. “The deep-buried IED was<br />

a signature threat in Ramadi- it was a weapon of choice of<br />

the insurgents to try and limit our avenues of approach into<br />

areas of the city, and the additional armor would have most<br />

likely improved the tanks’ survivability if they had had it then.”<br />

Towards the end of the company’s time in Ramadi, Tim lost one<br />

of his men, Specialist Douglas “DJ” Desjardins when a massive<br />

IED exploded directly underneath the driver’s station in the tank<br />

where he had been sitting. While the IED did not compromise<br />

the hull of the tank, without the extra belly armor, the bottom<br />

of the tank received the full force of the blast and killed him<br />

instantly.<br />

The Decision to Deploy<br />

Thermal Viewer - Immediately to the front and left of the Commander U.S.<br />

Marines with 1st Marine Division, 1st Tank Battalion, Delta Company, navigates<br />

the terrain of Helmand province, Afghanistan in a M1A1 Abrams Tank (U.S.<br />

Marine Corps photo).<br />

6 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

By October 2010, General Petraeus approved a Marine<br />

Corps request to introduce US tanks to Afghanistan. In<br />

conjunction with the recent deployment of the 3rd Battalion,<br />

8th Marines infantry battalion from the USS Kearsarge, Delta<br />

Company, 1st Tank Battalion Marines are currently executing<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


ASV RECON<br />

STATE-OF-THE-ART RECON AND SURVEILLANCE<br />

Textron Marine & Land Systems’ ASV Recon is designed to move six<br />

scouts rapidly when and where needed with outstanding road handling<br />

and excellent cross-country mobility.<br />

Using DRS Technologies’ harmonized stabilized turret, the ASV Recon<br />

enables LRAS3 operation on-the-move and under cover, and provides a<br />

stabilized shoot-on-the-move first round hit capability using CROWS II.<br />

Using a unique armor solution and a v-hull design, the ASV Recon has<br />

unparalleled survivability for a wheeled light armored vehicle. Fully<br />

combat loaded, on- or off-road, it provides the speed, agility, and<br />

stability to accomplish the full spectrum of operations.<br />

www.textronmarineandland.com<br />

© 2011 Textron Marine & Land Systems<br />

Textron Marine & Land Systems is an operating unit of Textron Systems,<br />

a Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) company


water supply across the giant plots of crops through endless mazes<br />

of ditches and irrigation canals.<br />

On February 18th, Major General Richard Mills, the top Marine<br />

Commander in Afghanistan, commented on Delta Company’s<br />

recent combat actions, including firing main gun rounds and<br />

engaging IED emplacers at long range. He also highlighted that<br />

three of the tanks themselves encountered IEDs with minimal<br />

damage and no casualties.<br />

Chuck Norris puts his arm around the tank’s driver, Specialist Douglass “DJ”<br />

Desjardins in front of the Chuck Norrise Tank (U.S. <strong>Army</strong> photo)<br />

their very first combat missions in Afghanistan since arriving in<br />

the Upper Gereshk Valley area of northern Helmand Province.<br />

After six months of deadly fighting in the area of Sangin (known<br />

by many as Afghanistan’s Falloujah, filled with enemy foreign<br />

fighters), Marine leaders developed a relationship with the local<br />

Alokozai Tribe, where the tribal members have agreed to expel<br />

foreign fighters and allow coalition patrols in exchange for an infusion<br />

of money and projects to the area. A unit held in reserve as part of<br />

a shipboard expeditionary force since September, 3/8 Marines was<br />

brought ashore to try to exploit this opportunity and secure one<br />

of the last trouble spots in the Sangin region. If successful, these<br />

Marines, with the support of Delta Company tanks, may have the<br />

opportunity to establish relationships with the first partner tribe in<br />

Afghanistan that could literally signify the beginning of the end to the<br />

war in that country, as it did for the War in Iraq.<br />

The Gereshk Valley starts just north of the Kandahar Highway<br />

(Highway 1) and Lashkar Gah, about midway between Marjah and<br />

Sangin along the green valley of the Helmand River. Similar to other<br />

rural areas in Helmand, the river crosses through the Gereshk Valley<br />

in a relatively flat patchwork of simple villages and their surrounding<br />

fields of poppy and other crops. With fairly little rain throughout<br />

most of the year, the villagers are masters at pushing the limited<br />

While there has not been any publicly released information<br />

regarding their current mission set, it can be inferred that the<br />

tanks are actively engaged in combat. They have either effectively<br />

provided overwatch as part of 3/8 Marines infantry operations,<br />

or they are providing MSR security on major roads between key<br />

logistical or operational hubs and are employing their weapons<br />

systems out to great distances during the day (using their 10x GPS-<br />

LOS sights) or at night (using the CITV or ITS- the remote thermal<br />

viewer) to take out the IED teams.<br />

The information regarding the IEDs and their limited impact is<br />

very important. It can further be inferred that the IEDs are typical<br />

to those often found in the rural areas of Helmand and are smaller<br />

and weaker (HMEs- fertilizer-derived Homemade Explosives) in<br />

comparison to daisy-chained artillery shell IEDs found in places like<br />

Falloujah and Ramadi. These Marines won’t experience casualties<br />

from locally produced IEDs. With its enhanced belly armor, the<br />

M1A1 Abrams is able to withstand the effects of the IED strikes<br />

that would have been serious enough to cause some severe<br />

casualties to non-tank, vehicle crew members as seen previously<br />

in Afghanistan.<br />

Using the War in Iraq as a reference, it is important to understand<br />

that while not all modern armor unit deployments may have made<br />

an overall positive impact during the course of war in terms of<br />

increasing security during their time on the battlefield, specific units<br />

like the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and the 1st Brigade, 1st<br />

Armored Division did in fact change the course of the war and were<br />

critical to increasing security and ending the conflict. It is likely that<br />

the successful employment of armor in Iraq directly influenced the<br />

decision to send armor to Afghanistan.<br />

Coming Next Month<br />

First Tanks - Evolution of Armor<br />

Sends U.S. Tanks to Afghanistan<br />

We follow the evolution of armor in Afghanistan and the decision<br />

to send in the first US tanks- the Marine Corps’ Delta Company,<br />

1st Tank Battalion. We also take a look at how the military’s armor<br />

schools and training are evolving to meet future threats on an<br />

uncertain battlefield.<br />

Map of Gereshk Valley (U.S. <strong>Army</strong> photo)<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

8 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Modern<br />

Amphibious<br />

Capability:<br />

Tradition Meets Necessity<br />

By Lt. Gen. George Flynn<br />

U.S. Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, VA<br />

“We ought not to look back, unless it is to<br />

derive useful lessons from past errors and<br />

for the purpose of profiting by dear bought<br />

experience.”<br />

– George Washington –<br />

There is no guarantee we will learn from the bloody<br />

combat lessons of the last century. The current penchant<br />

by some for questioning the Marine Corps’ need for an<br />

amphibious tracked vehicle suggests an ignorance of history<br />

and a lack of understanding of the future; it is unsupported<br />

by hard lessons learned, world trends, and a security<br />

environment characterized by a high degree of uncertainty.<br />

Our nation will most certainly require continued global access<br />

from the sea, and just as certainly there are forces at work<br />

that are actively and aggressively attempting to deny us that<br />

much needed access.<br />

The Secretary of Defense clearly stated that his decision<br />

to cut the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle program does<br />

not call into question the amphibious assault mission of<br />

the Marine Corps. Moreover, he stated the requirement of<br />

developing a more affordable and sustainable amphibious<br />

tractor to provide the Marines a ship-to-shore capability<br />

into the future.<br />

Maritime Need<br />

As America’s expeditionary force in readiness, the<br />

Marine Corps specializes in rapidly deploying anywhere in<br />

the world to develop access through partnership building<br />

activities, to create access in response to crises, and to<br />

provide the ability to force access to deter and/or defeat<br />

threats. The Corps will never be defined by a program, but<br />

rather by the capabilities we bring to the fight.<br />

As a maritime nation, the tyranny of distance, geography,<br />

and topography remain constant challenges to our global<br />

influence. As demonstrated countless times, our ability to<br />

come from the sea and overcome the challenges of natural<br />

and manmade barriers allows us to protect and defend U.S.<br />

interests. Our continued ability to respond is dependent<br />

on our ability to operate in uncertain environments, create<br />

opportunities and ensure freedom of action regardless of<br />

access challenges.<br />

The Marine Corps has learned that amphibious operations<br />

should avoid fixed defenses whenever possible. This<br />

option is not always available, however. In such cases, the<br />

amphibious tracked vehicle is essential to success. The<br />

tracked amphibious vehicle provides the ability to perform<br />

three critical tasks: ship-to-shore movement, breakout from<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 9


the beach and protected land mobility and firepower. As a<br />

result, the amphibious tracked vehicle has been a mainstay of<br />

amphibious capability. It has often proven the indispensible,<br />

enabling capability that Marines employ to both solve the<br />

sea/land mobility challenge and to gain advantage over our<br />

enemies.<br />

Proven Mainstay<br />

Recent operational experience and history attest to the<br />

effectiveness of amphibious tracked vehicles in providing the<br />

capability and capacity demanded by numerous operating<br />

environments—permissive, uncertain, or hostile. Most<br />

recently, amphibious tracked vehicles assisted in overcoming<br />

the devastated infrastructure in Haiti. These same vehicles<br />

were used to rescue stranded citizens and deliver relief<br />

supplies following Katrina’s devastation of the U.S. Gulf<br />

Coast in 2005. In the 1990s, these vehicles enabled relief<br />

efforts in Somalia during Operation RESTORE HOPE and<br />

subsequently provided the key capability necessary to safely<br />

withdraw U.N. forces in UNITED SHIELD. During the Korean<br />

War, these vehicles allowed us to project power from the<br />

sea at Inchon to reverse the looming defeat of U.S. forces<br />

trapped at Pusan. Given the proliferation of area denial<br />

weapons among both state and non-state actors, we believe<br />

that future operations—even those conducted for benign<br />

reasons—will be conducted under uncertain and highly<br />

dangerous conditions.<br />

Amphibious tracked vehicles employed from ships at<br />

sea provide the means to assure littoral access that no<br />

other capability can provide. They are the only combat<br />

vehicles built to operate effectively in the littorals: a<br />

complex environment of salt and fresh water, muddy marshes<br />

and estuaries, and dry land; rural, suburban and urban<br />

landscapes; wildly varying terrain; high to low population<br />

densities; and temperature extremes. They can quickly and<br />

seamlessly transit from ship-to-shore as well as swim rivers<br />

and negotiate inland water obstacles, providing the ability to<br />

achieve tactical and operational surprise. They protect their<br />

occupants as they maneuver on sea and land to a position<br />

of advantage and can close with an enemy or rescue our<br />

friends. Their known presence off shore historically has been<br />

a powerful deterrent and effective capability across the range<br />

of military operations.<br />

Sustain and Develop<br />

A modern amphibious tracked vehicle uses the sea<br />

as maneuver space, creates opportunities in the littorals,<br />

optimizes employment of amphibious forces, and enhances<br />

survivability in the face of area denial threats. An amphibious<br />

tracked vehicle is the proven means to overcome access<br />

challenges, natural or manmade, ranging from tsunamiravaged<br />

infrastructure to an armed aggressor seeking<br />

to oppose our maneuver. Amphibious tracked vehicles<br />

empower a flexible, ship-borne force to wait off shore for<br />

the opportunity to shape the security environment or alter an<br />

outcome. This unique capability provides our Nation with a<br />

critical power projection asset.<br />

There is no doubt that the sustainment and further<br />

development of our Nation’s amphibious capability is<br />

important for continued access to strategically vital regions<br />

of the world. We see a clear mandate to be ready to shape,<br />

influence, deter, and if necessary defeat would be forces that<br />

seek to deny us access. Meeting this mandate will allow us<br />

to profit “by dear bought experience” rather than repeat the<br />

errors of the past.<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

10 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Depots man STPE-I, Camp Armordillo<br />

By Belinda Lee, Public Affairs Officer, Red River <strong>Army</strong> Depot<br />

STPE-I, stored theater provided equipment-Iraq, is a key<br />

mission currently underway at Camp Armordillo, located in<br />

Baghdad, Iraq. The mission began in January 2010 and is<br />

spearheaded by Red River <strong>Army</strong> Depot with assistance from<br />

AMC sister depots Anniston and Tobyhanna <strong>Army</strong> Depots.<br />

Mission Readiness<br />

STPE-I houses an equipment fleet stored in the Iraq Joint<br />

Area of Operation (IJOA) and ready to issue to a unit to allow<br />

for full spectrum operation (FSO), if required once the combat<br />

mission in Iraq ends. The mission of STPE-I is to ensure combat<br />

tracked vehicles are fully mission capable (FMC) plus safety and<br />

sustained at that level.<br />

The vehicle fleet consists of Bradley Fighting Vehicles, M1<br />

Abrams, M109 Paladins, M992 Field Artillery Ammunition Supply<br />

Vehicle (FASVS) and the work horse of the fleet, the M88 Recovery<br />

Vehicle. Once all vehicles have met FMC level, STPE-I transitions<br />

to a preventive maintenance checks and services (PMCS) mode<br />

which requires annual services on each vehicle to maintain an<br />

operational readiness rate of above 90 percent. STPE-I must<br />

maintain a ready state to issue all vehicles immediately for any<br />

conflict requiring the services of these vehicles.<br />

The vehicles come from Fort Stewart, GA, through Kuwait<br />

and then trucked by secure convoy to the camp. The logistics<br />

of the operation is compounded by the security requirements of<br />

the deliveries and the required interaction with foreign nationals.<br />

Applying Lean principles has allowed the team to reduce fleet<br />

delivery processes from three hours to forty-five minutes per<br />

delivery.<br />

“Applying Lean principles comes natural for us. It is an<br />

everyday way of life at RRAD and we just automatically used<br />

those same principles in establishing this operation. Incoming<br />

drivers comment that usually when they make such deliveries<br />

it takes a full day.” “Our mission is to issue the fleet within 96<br />

hours of a request. Applying efficient lean principles and Safety<br />

procedures has afforded us the capability to more than meet the<br />

96 hour issue requirement,” said John Moore, former STPE-I<br />

site manager.<br />

Small and Capable<br />

The Camp Armordillo compound is a small area that requires<br />

personnel to be innovative in meeting the mission. Workers<br />

utilize their creative thinking in fabrication of needed parts to fulfill<br />

requirements. They build relationships with other services that<br />

prove valuable to both sides. Particularly valuable in completing<br />

missions are the joint endeavors with the Air Force.<br />

“Not only do we maintain a ready fleet for the soldier, we also<br />

provide an inventory of parts that accompany the vehicles when<br />

deployed with the units. These field parts give the units added<br />

insurance that they can complete their missions with our fleet of<br />

vehicles,” said Moore.<br />

Safety First<br />

Other business practices that the RRAD staff incorporated<br />

into the mission were their safety procedures. As the home<br />

depot seeks VPP Star status, the workforce has become<br />

equipped with automatic safety initiatives that enhance their<br />

work environment and the quality of their products. While<br />

working with servicing contractors and other units, those safety<br />

initiatives ‘rubbed-off’ on personnel outside the compound.<br />

“The 402nd Battalion Safety Officer visited the compound<br />

and stated he was there to perform a safety audit. Our safety<br />

officer provided job safety analyses for each work area and a<br />

formalized safety standard-operating-procedure for the mission.<br />

He found no violations,” said Moore. “For this type and size<br />

of operation, that is a remarkable accomplishment. We can<br />

attribute this to the instructions and training our personnel have<br />

received through the VPP Star journey at RRAD.”<br />

“Overall, the mission is very rewarding. As depots, we are<br />

able to go to the Soldier, use our skills and assist the Soldier in<br />

carrying out their mission. As Department of the <strong>Army</strong> Civilians,<br />

that is our ultimate goal,” said Moore.<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 11


TRAINING THAT TRANSFORMS<br />

Use of this image does not imply U.S. DoD endorsement.<br />

Experience is crucial in preparation for the battlefield. L-3 MPRI is providing the U.S. <strong>Army</strong> with immersive and<br />

innovative products and technical services that make the difference in training our nation’s warfighters. Every day<br />

our employees work in partnership to train, equip and prepare them for full spectrum operations. We understand<br />

the global threat and environments that they face and contribute to their ability to be a force multiplier in any<br />

situation. Our integrated training solutions will transform the way your soldiers prepare for the future. To learn<br />

more, visit us at www.mpri.com.<br />

MPRI<br />

L-3com.com


Commander’s <strong>Corner</strong><br />

Armor and<br />

Infantry =<br />

Synergy to win<br />

future fight<br />

Since 1918, Fort Benning has served as the Home of the<br />

Infantry. Since 1940, Fort Knox has served as the Home of the<br />

Armor. The transition to the Maneuver Center of Excellence<br />

began as a result of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure<br />

Commission’s decision to move the Armor School to Fort<br />

Benning. For years, these two branches have fought side by<br />

side on the battlefield. At the Maneuver Center of Excellence,<br />

these critical maneuver forces will train as they fight – together<br />

– and together, they will win!<br />

MG Robert B. Brown is the Commanding General of the<br />

Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE) at Fort Benning,<br />

GA. He was commissioned an Infantry Second Lieutenant<br />

in 1981 upon graduation from the U.S. Military Academy at<br />

West Point. During his time at West Point, MG Brown was an<br />

accomplished student-athlete, playing basketball for Coach<br />

Mike Krzyzewski and serving as team captain during his senior<br />

season.<br />

MG Brown brings a diverse background of Light, Mechanized,<br />

and Stryker assignments to Fort Benning, to include command<br />

at every level from company to brigade. As former commander<br />

of the <strong>Army</strong>’s second Stryker Brigade Combat Team out of Ft.<br />

Lewis, WA, for three and a half years – to include a 12-month<br />

rotation to Mosul, Iraq – MG Brown later served as the Deputy<br />

Commanding General of the 25th Infantry Division, where he<br />

deployed a second time to northern Iraq. During his career,<br />

MG Brown has also supported Operation Uphold Democracy<br />

in Haiti and Operation Joint Forge in Bosnia-Herzegovina.<br />

Q: Please talk about your role as Commanding General<br />

of the Maneuver Center of Excellence (include previous<br />

experience that has prepared you for this role).<br />

A: My main role at the Maneuver Center of Excellence is to<br />

maintain a strategic-level viewpoint to ensure we are preparing<br />

the <strong>Army</strong> for the current fight, as well as preparing the <strong>Army</strong> for<br />

MG Robert B. Brown<br />

Commanding General<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Maneuver Center of Excellence<br />

Ft. Benning, GA<br />

the future – It is critical to get this right.<br />

It is important I empower our two commandants – Armor and<br />

Infantry, to prepare for the current fight and to look to the future.<br />

We have had a lot of lessons learned and significant changes<br />

in our <strong>Army</strong>. Our enemy today is different as well. We may not<br />

see massed formations on a linear battlefield; it is more likely<br />

the enemy is a hybrid threat in a complex environment.<br />

I want to ensure the leaders and soldiers at Fort Benning have<br />

what they need to get the job done, while guiding them as we<br />

focus on the future. This includes everything – from the right<br />

leader development and training, to the right organizational<br />

structure and equipment.<br />

My goal is to empower and guide our center in strategic<br />

visioning as we fully support an <strong>Army</strong> at war now, and prepare<br />

for the future.<br />

I’ve been able to learn a lot about team building during my<br />

career. And that’s imperative as we meet the requirements<br />

of the job at hand – the task of completing the move of the<br />

Armor School to Fort Benning. We are taking two very distinct<br />

branches – Armor and Infantry – and bringing them together<br />

while maintaining their unique identity and lineage.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 13


Commander’s <strong>Corner</strong><br />

Q: Please talk about MCoE’s mission and role as part of the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> armor and infantry community, as well as the greater<br />

joint Department of Defense spectrum.<br />

The role of the Maneuver Center of Excellence is not to combine<br />

the Armor and Infantry branches. They are unique and distinct<br />

branches and they need to remain that way. They each bring<br />

a very critical background, a rich history and tradition, and a<br />

unique perspective to the current fight. However, they do need<br />

to train the way they are going to operate, train the way they<br />

are going to fight – together.<br />

We have seen from the last nine years of fighting that these<br />

two forces have to collaborate and cooperate to successfully<br />

engage and destroy the enemy. These two branches have<br />

proven they can integrate effectively in battle, so it is only<br />

appropriate they integrate in training. We must train as we<br />

fight!<br />

I mean think about it, as an Infantry officer, you don’t want<br />

the first time you are tasked to plan a mission including<br />

tanks to be while deployed in combat – and, vice versa as<br />

an Armor officer. You have to know what each one is capable<br />

of – what are its strengths, what are its weaknesses, how can<br />

we communicate and share intelligence? The integration of<br />

mounted and dismounted units is a key to success for our<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s future.<br />

An example of this integration is enabling the mounted and<br />

dismounted to share situational awareness and a common<br />

operating picture, while being linked to the same network.<br />

Our mounted platforms have kept pace with advancements in<br />

protection, communication, and networking capability with all<br />

of the many <strong>Army</strong> battle command systems such as Blue Force<br />

Tracker and FBCB2. However, despite all the advancements of<br />

our mounted platforms, we still lack the ability to network our<br />

dismounted force – the Tactical Small Unit – into a common<br />

operating picture with improved situational awareness.<br />

We are spending more money per soldier, and they are<br />

well-trained and well-armed. They are better protected and<br />

their ability to engage with precision has risen exponentially.<br />

However, the network capability of our mounted systems has<br />

to be extended to these tactical small units. Our vehicle crews<br />

have to be able to cross-talk and more importantly, share<br />

situational awareness and a common operating picture with<br />

our dismounted soldiers.<br />

The MCoE is putting a huge strategic-level emphasis on the<br />

soldier as a system. That is spending more at the tactical small<br />

unit level and focusing on the squad as a team. Our goal is to<br />

enable mounted and dismounted to be linked more effectively,<br />

and share better situational awareness and a common<br />

operating picture when they are on the ground and separated<br />

from the vehicle.<br />

This communication connectivity is good for all of the forces.<br />

It does not matter if we are conducting stability operations,<br />

14 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

a disaster response, wide-area security, combined arms<br />

maneuver or full-spectrum operations; each and every member<br />

plays a role in the success of the operation and needs shared<br />

situational awareness, a common operating picture and an<br />

ability to link into the network.<br />

The Maneuver Center can effectively take on this challenge.<br />

It requires both Armor and Infantry together. Alone, each<br />

could try to resolve the issue. However, it makes better sense<br />

for them to meet the requirement together. They can move<br />

us forward, so we’ll get to the point where the dismounted<br />

element – squad, tactical small unit – has better situational<br />

awareness and is using the technological advantage we have<br />

available today for our mounted forces.<br />

The Maneuver Center of Excellence directly impacts the<br />

entire Department of Defense spectrum as we work with all<br />

of the forces to collaborate, share best practices and lessons<br />

learned. All of the forces, and rightly so, have been consumed<br />

with the current fight and operations. The MCoE is developing<br />

opportunities for enhanced across-the-board dialogue, using<br />

forums and seminars, as well as websites, blogs and emerging<br />

technology. We want to provide avenues for these discussions<br />

and encourage everyone to play a role in helping to prepare<br />

all of our forces for the future. I am not necessarily talking<br />

about the service members who are currently involved in<br />

combat operations, those members are still busy. I am talking<br />

about those members who have returned home and have the<br />

opportunity to focus on the future effort.<br />

Q: From a joint and coalition global perspective, how is<br />

MCoE addressing the need for enhanced training, in keeping<br />

our soldiers ready to work with other national forces and a<br />

step ahead of their international counterparts?<br />

A: The key to training for future operations is what we call<br />

the blended training model. Rote repetition is still a major part<br />

of our training strategy – the technical, tactical and physical<br />

– everything from marksmanship, good physical training, and<br />

technical training.<br />

In the past, that was good enough for us to be successful –<br />

now it is not. We still have to do the rote repetition, but we<br />

also have to do more. You have to get at incorporating the<br />

challenges of the operating environment we will face anywhere<br />

in the world.<br />

It’s an overwhelming and vast amount of information; it’s a<br />

noncontiguous battlefield against an enemy who leverages<br />

technology, a complex operating environment, and an ability to<br />

work effectively with our Joint, Interagency, Intergovernmental<br />

and Multinational partners. Therefore, you have to use what<br />

we call live, virtual, constructive and gaming simulations to<br />

create those scenarios.<br />

The technology exists and it is up to the <strong>Army</strong> to collaborate<br />

with our industry and allied partners to bring our tactical small<br />

units online with our mounted platforms. We must develop a<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Commander’s <strong>Corner</strong><br />

network that is accessible in training – using the live, virtual,<br />

constructive and gaming environment – and also can be<br />

plugged into a secure network while deployed.<br />

We have to close the gap in our nation’s technology and<br />

training. In this time of declining resources, live, virtual,<br />

constructive and gaming will allow us to train with Allied<br />

nations in realistic environments and is cost effective. That is<br />

one way to close the gap that may exist between our nations.<br />

Only by doing this, will we truly be able to train as we operate.<br />

Q: From an enterprising perspective, how is MCoE working<br />

to promote partnering with industry in delivering more<br />

effective and efficient know-how to the warfighter?<br />

A: At the Maneuver Center, we tie in closely with the battle labs<br />

and with industry. We host a large Industry Day event once a<br />

year, and several small ones throughout the year. We share<br />

with them what we are thinking, show them what we perceive<br />

to be the key concepts for the future and get their input. This<br />

dialogue gives them direction. Their innovations have saved<br />

many of my soldiers’ lives and their support is terrific.<br />

An example of our collaboration can be seen in more emphasis<br />

being put on the dismounted soldier and the squad as a team.<br />

We are letting industry know that we see that as a need, so<br />

now they can look for innovative ways to meet this need.<br />

Maybe it’s a Smart Phone on a soldiers’ wrist with a screen<br />

that won’t break. Empowered by the knowledge of what we<br />

need, industry can start developing items to support these<br />

needs in the future.<br />

I also think industry does a much better job of getting the<br />

soldiers’ input early on as compared to 10-15 years ago. In<br />

the past, that dialogue began too late in the process, resulting<br />

in the delivery of equipment that wasn’t quite user friendly for<br />

the warfighter – maybe it was too heavy or not durable. Now,<br />

we see our industry partners getting the soldiers’ input very<br />

early on in the process and across the spectrum. It has a huge<br />

impact. We are seeing equipment tested in direct correlation<br />

with soldiers’ input making it more likely we’ll meet future<br />

requirements.<br />

Q: What are some of MCoE’s biggest successes before/<br />

since you assumed command?<br />

A: The Maneuver Center has had a lot of successes long<br />

before I got here. The success of the MCoE is its great soldiers<br />

and tremendous leaders. They are all constantly working and<br />

moving forward.<br />

I think one of the most important things that has been done<br />

recently is getting the force to look more to the future. In<br />

making sure that as we have the Armor and Infantry here,<br />

united in training and development, they stay unique and<br />

separate, while also building on each other’s strengths.<br />

MCoE success also has a long-term impact. It will set us up for<br />

future success by ensuring our units have the right equipment,<br />

the right organizational structure, and can be effective in<br />

tomorrow’s fight.<br />

Q: What are some of MCoE’s biggest challenges from an<br />

at-war armor and infantry training perspective, as the nation<br />

continues to combat asymmetric and terrorist threats today<br />

and in the future?<br />

A: As a nation, we have many lessons learned to draw from<br />

due to the last nine years of fighting a ruthless and unrelenting<br />

enemy. And while we have these lessons learned, when you<br />

look at such a high-operating tempo, none of us has had the<br />

time to effectively capture all that is out there. Our challenge<br />

is to be able to slow down enough to capture those best<br />

practices and lessons learned, then use them to help shape<br />

the future force. This is critical.<br />

The other challenge we face is getting everyone on board<br />

with the blended training model. There is a good segment of<br />

the force that believes simulations are just nice to do, and<br />

that a simulation is a good add-on to rote repetition, but<br />

not essential. I would say that the use of simulations now is<br />

absolutely essential in training the way we are going to operate<br />

in the future. We have to put soldiers and leaders through the<br />

complications of the operating environment today and in the<br />

future, before they face them for real.<br />

I understand there are physical challenges with simulation<br />

centers and that some installations do not have the tools<br />

they need because they are costly in the near term. Everyone<br />

needs to realize that money will be saved in the long term;<br />

there will be a significant return on the investment. We also<br />

are faced with the disbelief that to truly train the way you are<br />

going to operate, you have to use the blended training model<br />

– something I believe to be a key to future success.<br />

Feel free to discuss any continuing goals and objectives the<br />

MCoE is working.<br />

Viewing the dismounted soldier as a system is critical to<br />

enabling the same technological advancements as with<br />

mounted counterparts. We have to get the dismounted linked<br />

with the mounted and provide them with the same situational<br />

awareness and common operating picture.<br />

Also, just preparing the force for the future is absolutely<br />

critical, both in terms of technology, equipment, and leader<br />

development and training. We have to continue to lean forward.<br />

Change is always hard. But, to prepare for the future properly,<br />

it takes change. We have to really look at how we can work<br />

through the challenges – funding challenges, challenges of not<br />

enough time, and the challenges of a current high-operational<br />

tempo – so that we can truly shape the force for the future.<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 15


Joint, coalition partners prep<br />

IBCT for combat in Afghanistan<br />

By Casey E. Bain and Marie La Touche, JFIIT, USJFCOM<br />

Soldiers from the 170th Infantry Brigade Combat Team<br />

(IBCT), Baumholder, Germany, and joint and coalition partners<br />

from eight nations completed a unique exercise at the Joint<br />

Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) that focused on<br />

enhancing joint and combined fires, as well as improving the<br />

integration of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance<br />

(ISR) assets to better prepare the unit for the irregular warfare<br />

environment they will face in Afghanistan.<br />

This capstone training event for the 170th IBCT included<br />

vital support from the U.S. Air Force Europe (USAFE) Warrior<br />

Preparation Center, known as the Bullseye Team, and U.S.<br />

Joint Forces Command’s (USJFCOM) Joint Fires Integration<br />

and Interoperability Team (JFIIT) in Hohenfels, Germany.<br />

“The work done by JFIIT, USJFCOM and USAFE provided<br />

us additional capabilities and allowed us to do things like<br />

(provide) continuous virtual unmanned aircraft systems and<br />

close air support (CAS), even if we didn’t have those assets<br />

flying live here,” said <strong>Army</strong> Col. John Spiszer, commander,<br />

JMRC. “That’s a significant advantage for the units training<br />

here, and when you integrate the multinational forces into the<br />

16 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

mix, it’s a real good situation and separates us from the other<br />

training centers.”<br />

More than 4,000 participants from all four U.S. military<br />

services and eight coalition partners including Albania,<br />

Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Poland,<br />

Romania, and Slovenia participated in this three-week long<br />

exercise.<br />

“The JMRC, USAFE, and USJFCOM team are great examples<br />

of how we can integrate our coalition partners into a firstclass<br />

training environment that benefits the entire team,” said<br />

Marine Corps Maj. Kevin Moody, JFIIT’s JMRC lead. “This<br />

training will help the entire fires team shorten their learning<br />

curve and will improve the integration of coalition assets<br />

so the ground commander can more efficiently leverage all<br />

available capabilities in Afghanistan.”<br />

The exercise integrated a variety of joint enablers to<br />

replicate the resources that the BCT commander will have<br />

to support the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)<br />

in Afghanistan.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


“Our primary mission is to assist the command in their<br />

efforts to achieve a joint environment for each rotational unit<br />

that comes here to train,” said Ervin Cade, lead contractor,<br />

USJFCOM’s Joint National Training Capability Support<br />

Element, Hohenfels, Germany. “The goal is to provide JMRC<br />

with joint enablers like JFIIT, Special Operations Forces<br />

elements, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat<br />

Organization (JIEDDO), and others to create an accurate and<br />

realistic training environment that will foster greater integration<br />

and understanding between joint and multinational partners<br />

before they deploy. Ultimately, it makes us a better combined<br />

team and will save lives in the process.”<br />

JFIIT helped integrate several joint intelligence, surveillance,<br />

and reconnaissance (JISR) assets to facilitate the joint fires<br />

targeting process for the training unit during the exercise.<br />

“Without the support from JFIIT, we couldn’t do our mission<br />

of integrating CAS training for USAFE into the <strong>Army</strong>’s MRE at<br />

JMRC,” said Air Force Lt. Col. Scotty Briscoe, commander,<br />

Detachment 2, Warrior Preparation Center in Hohenfels. “As<br />

the tactical level arm of USAFE, our goal is to support the<br />

Air Support Operations Squadrons (ASOS) that train here so<br />

they can better integrate and support the ground scheme of<br />

maneuver just as they will when they’re deployed.”<br />

“The stated mission of the Taliban is to defeat NATO and<br />

kick NATO out of Afghanistan,” said <strong>Army</strong> Brig. Gen. Steven<br />

Salazar, commander, Joint Multinational Training Command,<br />

Grafenwoehr, Germany. “What we’re doing is NATO training by<br />

preparing our units, as well as our coalition partners, for NATO<br />

operations in Afghanistan. No other combat training center<br />

(CTC) is doing that. Helping us accomplish that are our joint<br />

enablers, like JFIIT. I can’t think of a single joint enabler that we<br />

have not been able to employ; they’re all absolutely essential.”<br />

“These joint assets help round us out and provide crucial<br />

resources that we couldn’t otherwise provide to the training<br />

audience,” said <strong>Army</strong> Maj. Sherman Watson, plans chief,<br />

JMRC. “Our goal is to replicate the operational environment<br />

from in-theater so the rotational training unit learns how to<br />

leverage those capabilities before they actually deploy. The<br />

joint fires training and JISR integration is an important part of<br />

what we’re providing to both U.S. and multinational units that<br />

come here to train.”<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 17


Providing a realistic and challenging multinational training<br />

environment is just one of the unique advantages to training<br />

at JMRC, according to participants at the exercise.<br />

“The training here has been spot on,” said <strong>Army</strong> Chief<br />

Warrant Officer Philip White, Apache attack helicopter pilot<br />

from 3-159 Attack Reconnaissance Battalion, Ansbach,<br />

Germany. “The opportunity to train at a world-class facility<br />

with so many joint and coalition partners has been incredible.<br />

I think we’re all learning a lot of valuable lessons from each<br />

other and that will make us a better team when we deploy.”<br />

I’ve been impressed with many of our multinational partners<br />

that are here training with us, especially the German joint<br />

fires observers (JFOs), said White. “They’re as good as I’ve<br />

seen and I think we mesh our skills together quite well.”<br />

“Our ability to integrate JISR assets into our targeting process<br />

has been superb,” said <strong>Army</strong> Capt. Jamen Miller, intelligence<br />

officer, 2-18 Infantry Battalion, 170th IBCT, Baumholder,<br />

Germany. “This is the first time that many of us have had the<br />

opportunity to work with many of these enablers that we’ll<br />

see once we’re deployed. This training will absolutely benefit<br />

the entire unit.”<br />

2011 JOINT SERVICE<br />

PROMOTING NATIONAL SECURITY SINCE 1919<br />

POWER EXPO<br />

Power to Sustain Warfighter Dominance<br />

Interact with Military Users, Decision Makers<br />

from DoD, DHS & other Government Agencies<br />

To Exhibit or<br />

Sponsor Contact:<br />

Conference:<br />

Angie DeKleine<br />

Soldiers from the 170th IBCT from Baumholder, Germany conduct a patrol with<br />

air-ground support from the Czech Republic and Germany as they trained for their<br />

upcoming deployment to Afghanistan. (Photo: Casey Bain, JFIIT, USJFCOM)<br />

“The training at JMRC has been very useful,” said Polish<br />

Special Forces Warrant Officer C. Charles, joint terminal<br />

attack controller (JTAC). “The familiarization training that<br />

we receive by working with many of our key partners is<br />

valuable and will be important to the speed in which we can<br />

successfully integrate together once we’re in Afghanistan.”<br />

Enhancing air-ground integration and CAS skills of both U.S.<br />

and multinational participants were some of the benefits of<br />

the exercise.<br />

“The training here is about combined fires not just joint fires,”<br />

added Moody. “The unique nature of this training center<br />

is that it provides exceptional air-to-ground training for the<br />

entire joint and multinational team that accurately replicates<br />

what is occurring in theater.”<br />

“JMRC is the quintessential mission readiness training<br />

exercise that provides both U.S. and coalition units, JTACs,<br />

JFOs, and aircrews with the skills they need to effectively<br />

work together to achieve both lethal and nonlethal effects<br />

on the battlefield,” said David Williams, JFIIT lead analyst in<br />

Germany. “This training will ultimately ensure the IBCT staff<br />

principles have a greater understanding and appreciation of<br />

joint and multinational enablers, and how to tactically employ<br />

them to their advantage.”<br />

According to senior leaders, the ability to forge important<br />

relationships with both joint and multinational partners is a<br />

strength that the command will build on to enhance training<br />

at JMRC for the foreseeable future.<br />

“We work with virtually all the partner contributing nations<br />

in Europe and stretching into Central Asia, Georgia, and a<br />

lot of the Eastern European countries, like Romania, Poland,<br />

the Czech Republic, and Slovenia,” Spiszer added. “We’ve<br />

got a great joint and multinational team that encompasses<br />

so many important enablers. Together, we create a more<br />

realistic training environment which translates into greater<br />

success downrange where it matters most.”<br />

MAY 3–5. 2011<br />

MYRTLE BEACH CONVENTION CENTER MYRTLE BEACH, SC<br />

WWW.NDIA.ORG/EXHIBITS/1670 EVENT #1670<br />

For more info: www.jmrc.hqjmtc.army.mil<br />

NDIA joint services 2011 PC final.indd 1<br />

18 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

5/25/10 9:20 AM<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Simple, Reliable, Accurate, Portable<br />

Fast and Easy<br />

Easy Transport-test everywhere<br />

Precise and accurate- built-in<br />

Intelligent Quality Control (IQC)<br />

Self calibrates with every test run<br />

Results in under 11 minutes<br />

Fully automated with full-color<br />

touch screen<br />

Intuitive user interface<br />

LIS connectivity<br />

Exceptionally Versatile<br />

Wide range of CLIA waived panels to increase your on-site diagnostic capabilities<br />

Step 1<br />

Add Sample<br />

Comprehensive Metabolic Panel<br />

ALB, ALP, ALT, AST, BUN, Ca, CI-, CRE,<br />

GLU, K+, Na+, TBIL, tCO2, TP<br />

Basic Metabolic Panel<br />

BUN, Ca, CI-, CRE, GLU, K+, Na+, tCO2<br />

Lipid Panel<br />

CHOL, CHOL/HDL*, HDL, LDL*, TRIG, VLDL*<br />

Lipid Panel Plus<br />

ALT, AST, CHOL, CHOL/HDL*, GLU,<br />

HDL, LDL*, TRIG, VLDL*<br />

Liver Panel Plus<br />

ALB, ALP, ALT, AMY, AST, GGT, TBIL, TP<br />

General Chemistry 6<br />

ALT, AST, BUN, CRE, GGT, GLU<br />

General Chemistry 13<br />

ALB, ALP, ALT, AMY, AST, BUN, Ca,<br />

CRE, GGT, GLU, TBIL, TP, UA<br />

Electrolyte Panel<br />

Cl-, K+, Na+, tCO2<br />

Kidney Check<br />

BUN, CRE<br />

Renal Function Panel<br />

ALB, BUN, Ca, Cl-, CRE, GLU, K+, Na+<br />

PHOS, tCO2<br />

MetLyte 8 Panel<br />

BUN, CK, Cl-, CRE, GLU, K+, Na+, tCO2<br />

*Hepatic Function Panel<br />

ALB, ALP, ALT, AST, DBIL, TBIL, TP<br />

*Basic Metabolic Panel Plus<br />

BUN, Ca, CI-, CRE, GLU, K+, Na+,<br />

tCO2, Mg, Lactate Dehydrogenase<br />

*MetLyte Plus CRP<br />

BUN, CK, Cl-, CRE, GLU, K+, Na+, tCO2, CRP<br />

*Biochemistry Panel Plus<br />

ALB, ALP, ALT, AMY, AST, BUN, Ca,<br />

CRE, CRP, GGT, GLU, TP, UA<br />

Step 2<br />

Insert Disk<br />

Step 3<br />

Read Results<br />

For more information contact: Randy Knick at<br />

612.850.1193 or e-mail randyknick@abaxis.com<br />

©2011 Abaxis, Inc. 3240 Whipple Road, Union City, CA 94587 Piccolo xpress is a trademark of Abaxis, Inc. *Moderately Complex


HULC:<br />

Lightening<br />

the Load<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong>, in conjunction with Lockheed Martin’s Missiles and Fire Control business unit in<br />

Orlando, Florida, will be testing the latest in robotic exoskeleton technology to provide soldiers<br />

with relief from the bulk of back-mounted supplies critical to mission success.<br />

By James Ni, HULC Program Manager at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control<br />

The latest generation of the Human Universal Load<br />

Carrier (HULC) soldier exoskeleton was introduced<br />

by Lockheed Martin this past fall and is touted to be<br />

a more robust, ruggedized system. The HULC offers<br />

warfighters a load carriage platform capable of carrying<br />

up to 200 lbs distributed between the front and back,<br />

operating for up to 20km on a single charge. The<br />

only battery powered, hydraulically-actuated system<br />

marketed toward the military, the HULC weighs 82<br />

lbs standalone and can be augmented with multiple<br />

application specific attachments. A lift assist device<br />

attached to the HULC would enable a front lift capacity of 150<br />

lbs, without the user feeling a pound of it.<br />

“When wearing HULC, a user has the capability of carrying<br />

upwards of 200 lbs of dead weight without feeling the stress of<br />

that weight at all. The weight is transferred thru the machine,”<br />

said Keith Maxwell, Lockheed Martin’s HULC Business<br />

Development manager. “From a soldier’s perspective, moving<br />

critical supplies, or even a wounded fellow soldier, can be the<br />

difference between a life saved and mission completed.”<br />

James Ni<br />

Lockheed Martin<br />

Fully loaded, a HULC user can actually move<br />

at walking or even running speeds of 0-7 mph<br />

without any stress from the load being transferred.<br />

While the system transfers weight to the ground,<br />

the soldier must still manage the inertia and<br />

depending on specific load weight, users will<br />

experience a difference in stopping distances from<br />

a dead run.<br />

“The HULC exoskeleton was developed to address<br />

critical military concerns,” said Maxwell. “These concerns<br />

include reducing load carriage injuries by transferring the<br />

weight of soldiers’ loads from the user onto the exoskeleton<br />

and reducing soldier fatigue by decreasing the metabolic<br />

cost of carrying heavy loads for prolonged periods. Lockheed<br />

Martin has developed and matured a game-changing<br />

technology to address these concerns.”<br />

For more info: www.lockheedmartin.com/mfc<br />

20 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


AEDC provides the warfighter with critical assets<br />

ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, TN. –Bagram Air Base,<br />

Afghanistan is approximately 7,300 miles from Arnold<br />

Engineering Development Center (AEDC) in Middle,<br />

Tennessee, but the work being done at AEDC directly<br />

impacts the warfighter in that remote region. In fact,<br />

ground testing on a range of weapons systems at<br />

AEDC provides the war-winning capabilities needed at<br />

innumerable locations globally.<br />

Prolonged Power<br />

One example of this influence is AEDC’s role in testing<br />

the F100-PW-229 engine powering the F-15 Eagle and<br />

F-16 Fighting Falcon fighter jet aircraft. The command<br />

goal in testing the engine was to ensure it would run 6,000<br />

Total Accumulated Cycles (TAC) between depot overhauls,<br />

providing the warfighter with an enduring asset. TAC is a<br />

unit of measurement for major rotating engine components<br />

used to track service life.<br />

“This 6,000 TAC engine’s depot maintenance interval is<br />

[now] 10 years versus seven years for 4,300 TAC engines<br />

with a 30 percent life cycle cost reduction and significant<br />

safety benefits,” said Mike Dent, an Air Force test manager<br />

at AEDC.<br />

The F100-PW-229 Engine Enhancement Package (EEP)<br />

engine tested at AEDC is the most current operational version<br />

available to power the Air Force fleet of F-15 and F-16 fighter<br />

jets and is currently being flown by U.S. allies.<br />

“There is immeasurable value to the field from the<br />

increased availability of the engines to support the warfighter<br />

both in terms of less maintenance and longer life spans,” said<br />

Lt. Col. James Peavy, director of the Turbine Engine Ground<br />

Test Complex. “This testing lets us develop a more robust<br />

engine and gives us a chance to look at the performance of<br />

improved parts for fielding later.”<br />

Simulation Sensation<br />

Also accomplished by engineers and support personnel<br />

at AEDC was ground testing of a missile plume simulator<br />

to test airborne sensors deployed by the U.S. military to<br />

locate, avoid and evade threats posed by hostile forces using<br />

shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles.<br />

The recent certification of an AEDC-built and tested<br />

Towed Airborne Plume Simulator (TAPS) has provided the<br />

Center for Countermeasures (CCM) with a vital component<br />

for developing sensors to counter the threat posed by manportable<br />

air-defense systems (MANPADS), according to Dr.<br />

Robert Hiers, Aerospace Testing Alliance’s technical fellow for<br />

instrumentation and diagnostics technology at AEDC.<br />

“The CCM now has an accurate missile simulator, an<br />

operationally-ready asset that can be towed 100 to 1,000<br />

meters behind an aircraft to test missile-warning sensors<br />

on military aircraft and allow for either evasive or defensive<br />

action,” Hiers said<br />

The Towed Airborne Plume Simulator (TAPS), one of four, has been flight<br />

tested and validated following initial test runs at AEDC in 2007. (Photo by<br />

David Housch)<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 21


Strategic Leadership<br />

Connecting Battlespace and Warfighter<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong>) is on a<br />

perpetual mission: Preparing today’s combat soldier for tomorrow’s combat challenges.<br />

Submitted by <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> Public Affairs<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Program Executive Office for Simulation,<br />

Training and Instrumentation (<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong>) provides responsive<br />

simulation, training and testing solutions for the nation and<br />

its warfighters. <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> offers lifecycle support for the U.S.<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s advanced training systems around the world.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> executes programs valued at more than $3 billion<br />

with a workforce of nearly 1,200 military, civilian, and inhouse<br />

contractor personnel and is responsible for sustaining<br />

335,000 training systems at 480 sites worldwide, including<br />

19 foreign countries. The organization’s Acquisition Center<br />

manages more than 950 contracts valued at more than $10<br />

billion. In addition, <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong>’s Foreign Military Sales program<br />

supports countries around the world. Headquartered in<br />

Central Florida’s Research Park, the organization also has<br />

geographically separated offices in Redstone Arsenal, AL, Ft.<br />

Bliss, TX, and Ft. Huachuca, AZ.<br />

Every soldier deployed to a theater of operation has trained<br />

on a <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> training device.<br />

As the U.S. <strong>Army</strong> experiences a drawdown in Iraq and places<br />

an increased emphasis on operations in Afghanistan, <strong>PEO</strong><br />

<strong>STRI</strong> proudly remains the nation’s premier provider of training<br />

devices for the American soldier.<br />

Currently, <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> supports a wide range of training activities<br />

that prepare Soldiers for the full spectrum of operations in<br />

Afghanistan.<br />

For instance, the organization—in partnership with its<br />

industry partners—enhanced the Common Driver Trainer<br />

program to include the MRAP All Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV).<br />

With guidance from Headquarters, Department of the <strong>Army</strong>,<br />

and the expertise from industry, <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> was able to field<br />

M-ATV driver trainers very quickly. The M-ATV variant for<br />

the Common Driver Trainer allows Soldiers to drive these<br />

vehicles before they get to Afghanistan and under a number<br />

of hazardous driving conditions like narrow roadways and<br />

inclement weather.<br />

The <strong>Army</strong> looks at the Common Driver Trainer program as<br />

a prime example of efficiency. This family of simulators has<br />

stepped up to the plate time and time again to meet the training<br />

requirements of our <strong>Army</strong>. Using common components,<br />

the simulator can be transformed to train Soldiers to drive<br />

everything from a Stryker to a tank to an MRAP.<br />

Additionally, <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> recently integrated the geo-specific<br />

terrain database for Afghanistan into the Common Driver<br />

Trainer program. Because of these efforts, U.S. soldiers<br />

can virtually “drive” on the streets of Afghanistan. Similarly,<br />

they added the Afghanistan database into the Close Combat<br />

Tactical Trainer, Call for Fire Trainer and Aviation Combined<br />

Arms Tactical Trainer, thereby allowing soldiers to virtually<br />

train in their actual assigned deployment locations.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> is also helping soldiers right here on the home<br />

front. Most notably, in September 2010, the organization—<br />

in coordination with the special operations community—<br />

fielded the first Soldier Tracking System to Ft. Bragg, N.C.,<br />

and made the grueling land navigation exercise safer for<br />

Green Beret candidates. The Multiple Integrated Laser<br />

Engagement System and Initial Homestation Instrumentation<br />

Training System were moved from Alaska—where they were<br />

simulating combat during force-on-force training exercises—<br />

to Ft. Bragg in order to track soldiers navigating the course.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> understands that, in order to continually meet<br />

the high-demands of the <strong>Army</strong>, they must maintain a highlytalented<br />

and seasoned workforce. For this reason, in 2008,<br />

the Acquisition Academy was created. To date, the Academy<br />

has introduced 73 interns to the federal government, and<br />

along with them has come fresh ideas and eager attitudes. In<br />

fact, 97 percent of all the Acquisition Academy interns are still<br />

contributing members of the Department of Defense.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> is proud to support the American soldier. Playing<br />

a pivotal role in giving soldiers the decisive edge in defending<br />

the nation, <strong>STRI</strong> works tirelessly to provide our warfighters<br />

with the most technologically advanced training devices so<br />

they can accomplish their missions and return home safely<br />

to their families.<br />

22 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Strategic Leadership<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong><br />

<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Dr. James Blake<br />

D<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Mr. Rob Reyenga<br />

A<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Business Operations<br />

Mr. Ken Wheeler<br />

PM Trade<br />

COL Mike Flanagan<br />

PM CATT<br />

COL Francisco Espaillat<br />

A<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Project Support<br />

Ms. Traci Jones<br />

PM ConSim<br />

COL Karen Saunders<br />

PM ITTS<br />

COL Mike Zarbo<br />

Acquisition Center<br />

Mr. Joe Giunta<br />

A<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Customer Support<br />

Mr. Pete Marion<br />

PM Field OPS<br />

Mr. Russ McBride<br />

PM FFS<br />

Mr. Bob Capote (acting)<br />

A<strong>PEO</strong><br />

Special Staff<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 23


Strategic Leadership<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong><br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> Project Management Offices<br />

Project Manager for Combined Arms Tactical Trainers<br />

(PM CATT)<br />

PM CATT manages the development, acquisition, fielding<br />

and life-cycle support of the virtual synthetic environment and<br />

associated training aids, devices, simulators and simulations<br />

to support individual, institutional and collective training.<br />

PM CATT refers to a group of high-fidelity, interactive,<br />

manned simulators; command, control and communications<br />

workstations; exercise control stations; after-action review<br />

systems; and the virtual combined arms synthetic environment<br />

used to support virtual training up to the battalion and task<br />

force level. PM CATT’s virtual synthetic environment includes<br />

large-scale virtual terrain representations with synthetic<br />

natural environment effects and accredited computer<br />

generated forces that replicate adjacent, supporting and<br />

opposing forces.<br />

Project Manager for Constructive Simulation<br />

(PM ConSim)<br />

PM ConSim acquires, fields and sustains constructive<br />

simulations and integrated simulation environments to support<br />

<strong>Army</strong> Battle Command and Intelligence collective training<br />

requirements. Constructive simulations and integrated multidomain<br />

environments are the most effective and efficient<br />

means to train commanders and staffs from company to<br />

theater level. PM ConSim supports training transformation,<br />

<strong>Army</strong> Force Generation and the modular force providing<br />

tailored-made integrated environments for collective training<br />

objectives across the full spectrum of military operations.<br />

Project Manager for Field Operations (PM Field OPS)<br />

PM Field OPS provides worldwide operations, maintenance,<br />

sustainment and instructional support of training systems used<br />

by the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>, Air Force, Marines, Navy and multinational<br />

coalition forces. PM Field OPS uses three training services<br />

contracts to accomplish its mission of providing integrated<br />

live, virtual and constructive training worldwide. The three<br />

contracts are the Warfighter FOCUS contract, the Artillery,<br />

Chemical and Air Defense contract and the Flight School XXI<br />

training services contract.<br />

Project Manager for Instrumentation, Targets and<br />

Threat Simulators<br />

PM ITTS was established in 1990 at Aberdeen Proving<br />

Ground, Md., to provide centralized acquisition of the<br />

research, development, production and fielding of test assets<br />

24 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

and investments in support of full-spectrum, developmental<br />

and operational testing for the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>. PM ITTS is the<br />

life-cycle manager of major test instrumentation, aerial and<br />

ground targets, and threat simulators and systems, as well<br />

as the manager of the operation and maintenance of targets<br />

and threats for developmental and operational test and<br />

evaluation. Additionally, PM ITTS is the executor for programs<br />

and funding of <strong>Army</strong>-led Office of the Secretary of Defense<br />

Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program.<br />

Project Manager for Training Devices<br />

PM TRADE is the <strong>Army</strong>’s solution provider for collective<br />

instrumented live training systems. PM TRADE’s mission is<br />

to develop, acquire, field and sustain a family of interoperable<br />

live training solutions for use at homestation, Combat Training<br />

Centers and deployed sites to improve Warfighter readiness<br />

in peacetime and in war. Managing the acquisition of training<br />

systems to meet the user’s requirements, the goal is to deliver<br />

the systems on schedule and within cost and to provide lifecycle<br />

management to ensure the best value products for the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> and joint service customers.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> Acquisition Center<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong>’s Acquisition Center provides sound business<br />

advice and tailored contracting and acquisition solutions to<br />

acquire a variety of products and services managed by <strong>PEO</strong><br />

<strong>STRI</strong> in support of the U.S. <strong>Army</strong> and the Nation’s security. It<br />

serves as an Acquisition and Contracting Center of Excellence<br />

that focuses on customer satisfaction; promotes innovative<br />

and flexible business practices, calculated risk-taking,<br />

empowerment and partnering with industry; and emphasizes<br />

diversity in the workforce and professional development.<br />

Three Pillar Contracts<br />

Simulation and Training Omnibus Contract (STOC II)<br />

Awarded in January 2009, STOC II provides the Warfighter with<br />

the next generation of simulation and training devices to meet<br />

the challenges of the joint operational environment. STOC II<br />

is not only a continuation but an evolution of its predecessor,<br />

STOC I. The omnibus contracting vehicle awarded a total of<br />

142 contracts spread over two lots: Lot I, Full and Open Lot<br />

(consisting of small and large businesses), and Lot II, Small<br />

Business Set-Aside. These awards resulted in multipleaward,<br />

indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts that will<br />

provide troops with simulation, training and instrumentation<br />

products and services beginning with concept development<br />

and continuing through life-cycle support.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Strategic Leadership<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong><br />

Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support Contract<br />

(Warfighter FOCUS)<br />

Warfighter FOCUS is a contract that fully integrates the live,<br />

virtual and constructive training services at <strong>Army</strong> installations<br />

worldwide. As the <strong>Army</strong> continues to field an increasing<br />

number of interoperable training systems, the Warfighter<br />

FOCUS contract provides a fully-integrated contractor<br />

workforce to operate and maintain them. Furthermore, the<br />

contract will allow <strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> to provide a more rapid response<br />

to Department of the <strong>Army</strong> requests.<br />

Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance Services<br />

(SETA) Contract<br />

An indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for SETA<br />

services was awarded in August 2009 with a period of<br />

performance of five years. The SETA contract provides<br />

systems engineering and technical support services for<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> <strong>STRI</strong> and other federal agencies worldwide. The<br />

services include providing responsive, integrated and<br />

interoperable infrastructure for simulation, training, testing,<br />

and instrumentation solutions and acquisition services for the<br />

Warfighters and the Nation.<br />

For more info: www.peostri.army.mil<br />

For your complimentary<br />

subscription, please<br />

visit our website at<br />

tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

Patent Pending<br />

EXTREME RUGGED<br />

ENVIRONMENT<br />

MEETS<br />

EXTREME RUGGED<br />

MOBILITY<br />

Gamber-Johnson introduces a new type of computer docking station for tactical applications.<br />

The RECON dock is designed to work with the Panasonic Toughbook 19 computer.<br />

• SPACE, WEIGHT AND POWER –(SWAP): Low Profile/Small Footprint design, constructed using light-weight<br />

stainless steel and aluminum materials. Includes an 18V-32V ruggedized power supply.<br />

• CORROSION RESISTANCE: Stainless steel and conversion coated aluminum chassis components with stainless<br />

steel hardware.<br />

• VIBRATION/SHOCK ISOLATION: Stainless steel stranded wire cables with secondary rubber chassis isolators.<br />

Removable isolation system for easy installation.<br />

• TESTING/CERTIFICATIONS: MIL-STD 810G Environmental including Thermal Shock,<br />

IP65 dust/water Ingress, MIL-STD 810G Shock/Vibration, 75 G Crash Hazard<br />

Shock, MIL-STD 461F EMI.<br />

For more information call 877-412-6578 >>> www.gamberjohnson.com/Federal_Military<br />

Military ad_F.indd 1<br />

12/20/10 11:39 AM<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 25


BRAC Spotlight<br />

“Grow the <strong>Army</strong>” Grows On<br />

As part of the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s “Grow the <strong>Army</strong>” Initiative,<br />

the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division,<br />

today known as 4th BCT, 4th Infantry, has relocated<br />

successfully to Ft. Carson, CO from the Republic<br />

of South Korea, leading the first of a series of<br />

unit redeployments aimed at consolidating force<br />

effectiveness.<br />

Submitted by LTC David H. Patterson Jr. OCPA - Media<br />

Relations Division Media Team Chief, Operations, Intelligence<br />

and Logistics<br />

OIF Deployment<br />

In May 2004, the Department of Defense announced that the<br />

2nd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division (2-2) stationed in South Korea<br />

would be deploying to Iraq in August as part of Operation Iraqi<br />

Freedom. The 2nd Brigade acted as a deterrent against North<br />

Korean aggression against the Republic of South Korea (ROK)<br />

and was based at Camp Hovey for the past 50 years. The<br />

deployment to Iraq was for one year and affected roughly 3,600-<br />

3,700 soldiers. The 2nd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division was the<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s only Light/Heavy Brigade with two Air Assault Battalions,<br />

the 1-503rd Infantry (Air Assault) and the 1-506th Infantry (Air<br />

Assault) and also had the 1-9th Infantry assigned to it.<br />

On 23 September 2004, the Department of the <strong>Army</strong> announced<br />

the temporary relocation of 2-2 from South Korea to Ft. Carson,<br />

26 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

CO following its deployment to Iraq. Temporary stationing of 2-2<br />

was operationally imperative to ensure the <strong>Army</strong> was postured<br />

to fully support its strategic global commitments. Additionally,<br />

2-2 was scheduled to transform into a campaign-quality force<br />

with joint and expeditionary capabilities to meet the demands<br />

of combatant commanders sometime in 2005. Shortly after<br />

redeployment to Ft. Carson after completing its first deployment<br />

since arriving from South Korea, 2-2 began transformation to<br />

the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s new modular force structure. Units previously<br />

held at division level were assigned and became organic to the<br />

unit, a key element of modular transformation. As a result, many<br />

of its units were reflagged.<br />

Homefront Reflaggings<br />

With 2-2’s redeployment stateside, some key reflaggings within<br />

the unit involved; 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry, reflagged as the<br />

1st Battalion; 9th Infantry, 1st Battalion, 9th Infantry reflagged<br />

as the 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry; and 1st Battalion, 506th<br />

Infantry reflagged as the 2nd Battalion, 12th Infantry. The 2nd<br />

Battalion, 17th Field Artillery and 2nd Forward Support Battalion<br />

(re-designated 2nd Brigade Support Battalion) were also made<br />

organic to the new Brigade Combat Team (BCT). As part of the<br />

transformation, 2-2’s two Air Assault battalions were reassigned<br />

and reflagged as regular infantry battalions. In addition, 2-2<br />

gained a cavalry squadron -- the 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry.<br />

The 2nd Forward Support Battalion was re-designated as the<br />

2nd Brigade Support Battalion and became organic to the BCT,<br />

as did the 2nd Battalion, 17th Field Artillery.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


In October 2006, the new 2-2 returned to Iraq in support of<br />

Operation Iraqi Freedom. After the deployment, the 2nd BCT<br />

returned to Ft. Carson and became part of a large reorganization<br />

of U.S. <strong>Army</strong> units. In April 2008, 2-2 was subsequently<br />

inactivated and its personnel and equipment were reflagged as<br />

the 4th Infantry BCT, 4th Infantry Division, the <strong>Army</strong>’s first of six<br />

Infantry BCTs added as part of the Grow the <strong>Army</strong> Initiative.<br />

Q: Please provide some brief background regarding the<br />

BRAC recommendation to move 2nd Brigade/2nd Infantry<br />

to Ft. Carson, Colorado.<br />

A: 2-2 ID was identified under BRAC 2005 but not recommended<br />

by the BRAC Commission. A detailed analysis was conducted<br />

using the BRAC process and Military Value Analysis to determine<br />

locations for stationing six Growth Infantry BCTs. The unit<br />

relocated from South Korea to Ft. Carson, CO under Global<br />

Defense Posture Realignment and Grow the <strong>Army</strong> to achieve<br />

<strong>Army</strong> end strength of 74.2K by FY13.<br />

Q: Please briefly explain the primary objectives for the<br />

relocation at the brigade/infantry level as well as <strong>Army</strong>-wide.<br />

A: Relocation of 2-2 ID was operationally imperative to ensure the<br />

<strong>Army</strong> was postured to fully support its strategic commitments.<br />

Additionally, the 2-2 ID transformed to a campaign-quality force<br />

with joint and expeditionary capabilities that met the demands<br />

of combatant commanders. Ft. Carson was selected based on<br />

existing facility capacities, available training space, and current<br />

locations of similar units.<br />

Q: Please provide a timetable for the planned phases of<br />

the move.<br />

A: In early 2005, the 2nd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division began<br />

transformation to the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s new modular force structure.<br />

Then unit deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. By<br />

August 2005, soldiers of the 2nd BCT, 2nd Infantry Division<br />

redeployed to Ft. Carson after completing the Brigade’s first<br />

deployment since the Korean War. In 2006, after redeploying<br />

to Ft. Carson, the unit began transformation to the U.S. <strong>Army</strong>’s<br />

new modular force structure-BCT. On 8 April 2008, the 2nd<br />

BCT, 2nd Infantry Division was inactivated and its personnel<br />

reflagged as the 4th BCT, 4th Infantry Division.<br />

Q: Please explain the re-integration of 2nd Brigade/2nd<br />

Infantry.<br />

A: The inactivation of the 2-2ID and reflagged to become the 4th<br />

BCT, 4th Infantry Division was part of the Grow the <strong>Army</strong> (GTA)<br />

Plan. The 2-2ID, now 4-4 ID was the first of six brigade combat<br />

teams programmed under GTA.<br />

Q: Please speak to any future objectives of 2nd Brigade/2nd<br />

Infantry.<br />

A: The 2nd Brigade 2nd Infantry, now re-designated as the 4th<br />

Infantry Brigade Combat Team 4th Infantry Division, stands<br />

ready to bring the full spectrum of combat power to meet our<br />

nation’s call once again.<br />

For more info: www.first.army.mil<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 27


FutureTech<br />

Headgear Integrated Comms<br />

3M, supplier of technology for commercial and defense application, has<br />

introduced an integrated communications solution for use with the Ops-<br />

Core FAST (Future Assault Shell Technology) Helmet. The new helmet<br />

attachment for new 3MPeltor ComTac Headset has been designed<br />

to interface with the Ops-Core ARC Kit (Accessory Rail Connector), offering<br />

FAST Helmet wearers combined protection and comms capability.<br />

Using a 3M mounting mechanism with two stainless steel cables<br />

connecting the ear cups of the ComTac headset to the side rails of the<br />

FAST Helmet, the integrated solution addresses the challenge of donning<br />

and doffing the helmet while reducing the need to modify the internal helmet<br />

padding for a proper fit. The spring tension on the ear cups allows for an<br />

“open” and “closed” position. The “open” position allows for easy donning/<br />

doffing the helmet while the “closed” position is designed to positive seal<br />

against the head. The “open” position also provides ventilation in high heat<br />

environments but can permit the user to monitor radio communications via<br />

the speakers in the ear cups. Each ear cup can also be rotated 90 degrees<br />

to the rear and stored on the back of the helmet.<br />

For more info: www.peltormilitary.com or frank.gavin@mmm.com<br />

COTS Servers being Redesigned<br />

for Military Applications<br />

Military operations are being inundated with data from an expanding<br />

network of sources, including sensor data from Unmanned Aircraft<br />

Systems (UAS), satellites, and remote monitoring stations. A new<br />

white paper released by Z Microsystems, a provider of mission-ready<br />

computing systems, provides an in-depth analysis of how ruggedized<br />

servers are being redesigned by Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS)<br />

suppliers to meet these demands.<br />

The white paper, entitled “Redesigning COTS Servers for Military<br />

Applications,” examines the ways in which rugged computer platforms<br />

can incorporate COTS motherboards and extend the capabilities of<br />

commercial components. The paper includes details on how systems can<br />

be designed to withstand shock, vibration, and temperature extremes<br />

while providing the versatility and flexibility needed in the field. Specific<br />

adaptations include hot-swappable component parts and disk drives,<br />

redundant power supplies, and rack-mount servers in place of laptops.<br />

“Whether on a Navy ship, an aircraft, or a UAS ground station in the<br />

middle of a desert, these operations rely on data center computing power,”<br />

said Jack Wade, CEO of Z Microsystems. “COTS manufacturers can use<br />

a variety of techniques at each stage of the design, manufacturing, and<br />

testing processes to meet U.S. Military Standards and ensure the system<br />

will be rugged enough for a particular application.”<br />

RF-EO Protection<br />

for Aircraft<br />

Elisra, a company specializing in EW,<br />

intelligence and communications solutions, has<br />

introduced an active and passive self-protection<br />

suite for helicopters and transport aircraft. The<br />

suite constitutes a new stage in the evolution of<br />

self-protection and survival systems for airborne<br />

platforms. Offering a complete and comprehensive<br />

RF-Laser-EO protection shell, it combines RWR,<br />

LWR, IR-PAWS, RF Jammer, laser DIRCM and<br />

Chaff/Flare dispensing functions, providing quick<br />

reaction time and effective responses to all types of<br />

threats.<br />

With seamless interoperability of components,<br />

the system searches and detects threats, provides<br />

warning and jamming against airborne and groundbased<br />

EO, RF and laser threats presented by all<br />

types of air defense systems, including missiles,<br />

MANPADS, ground-based fire, RPGs and others.<br />

The system also offers a host of additional capabilities<br />

including pinpoint geolocation of threats.<br />

For more info: natasha.pheiffer@baesystems.com<br />

For more info: www.zmicro.com<br />

28 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


FutureTech<br />

Combat-Rugged<br />

Computing<br />

Software-Defined Airborne Radio<br />

LogIn Crete AB has launched its new series of<br />

combat-rugged notebook computers – Rocky RT986<br />

and Rocky RK986. The newly launched combatrugged<br />

computers offer higher performance to run<br />

heavier, more demanding software.<br />

With a memory capacity of 8 GB and capacity<br />

of 1695 MB that can be dedicated to an Intel GMA<br />

4500 MHD graphics memory, limits experienced by<br />

previous variations in running advanced applications<br />

and map software have been overcome. Both Rocky<br />

RT986 and Rocky RK986 have Intel® Core 2 Duo<br />

Processors running at 2.26 GHz, cooled effectively<br />

via the chassis enabling quiet and reliable operation.<br />

Rocky RT986 and Rocky RK986 have also been<br />

upgraded to IP55 and now comply with the latest<br />

MIL-STD-810G and MIL-STD-461F.<br />

For more info: oskar.forssell@login.se<br />

Elbit Systems Ltd. (“Elbit Systems”) has announced<br />

the launch of its latest software-defined radio, the airborne<br />

Tadiran SDR-7200AR. Specifically designed for airborne<br />

platforms, this innovative radio system has automatic routing<br />

and relay capabilities to offer extended range, while offering<br />

video, voice and data simultaneously at an exceptionally high<br />

data rate.<br />

Embedded in the radio system are fundamental avionics<br />

applications for enhanced situational awareness, including<br />

video and safety enhancement features. These applications<br />

enable on-the-move commands and real-time intelligence<br />

updates that are automatically updated on a built-in C4I<br />

system.<br />

The Tadiran SDR-7200AR offers versatility in enabling<br />

direct support of air-to-air, air-to-sea and air-to-ground<br />

communications. The product is fully compliant with the<br />

Software Communications Architecture SCA version 2.2.2.<br />

For more info: www.elbitsystems.com<br />

Through its teaming agreement with General Dynamics<br />

Land Systems Canada (GDLS-C), BAE Systems, Land Systems<br />

South Africa recently won a contract worth more than $130<br />

million for survivability and mobility upgrades to its RG31 Mine<br />

Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles.<br />

The upgrade kits will further enhance the survivability<br />

and mobility of battle-proven RG31 vehicles. As part of the<br />

modernization work in South Africa, a powerpack providing<br />

higher performance and new suspension components and<br />

transfer cases, designed and manufactured by BAE Systems,<br />

will be incorporated into the upgrade kits.<br />

RG31 MRAP READINESS AND SUSTAINMENT<br />

“We appreciate our ongoing relationship with GDLS-C as<br />

well as the confidence that the U.S. military has in the RG31<br />

vehicle. Readiness and Sustainment is an important part of<br />

our business and through these programmes we continue to<br />

protect the lives of U.S. soldiers,” said Johan Steyn, Managing<br />

Director BAE Systems, Land Systems South Africa.<br />

In total, over 1,600 RG31 vehicles have been delivered<br />

through GDLS-C under the MRAP program. An additional<br />

566 RG31s have been delivered to U.S. forces under separate<br />

contracts.<br />

For more info: www.generaldynamics.com<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 29


Asymmetric Warfare Developments<br />

Mission: Enemy Misfire<br />

DoD’s Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) is developing the next<br />

generation of Rhino passive counter-passive infrared (PIR) sensor technology designed to<br />

trigger IED detonations before U.S. and coalition forces advance into harm’s way.<br />

By Anthony Richiazzi, PAO Tobyhanna <strong>Army</strong> Depot<br />

Even with the shift in the U.S. war effort<br />

to Afghanistan, IEDs remain the principal<br />

killer of American troops in combat. In<br />

Afghanistan — where the number of IED<br />

incidents doubled in 2009 and caused 75<br />

percent of casualties in some areas — the<br />

U.S. Joint Improvised Explosive Device<br />

Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) faces a new<br />

generation of more ingenious, and bigger,<br />

bombs. Even excluding those in Iraq and<br />

Afghanistan, there were nearly 3,300 IED<br />

incidents around the world in 2009. “The<br />

IED as a tactical weapon is a condition of<br />

our workplace in the armed forces,” says<br />

Michael Oates, JIEDDO Director. “We believe<br />

it will be a persistent threat.”<br />

Soldiers prepare to deploy RHINO during route clearance operations in theater. (U.S. <strong>Army</strong> photo)<br />

The introduction in 2006 of a new type of IED called the<br />

explosively formed penetrator, or EFP, to the fight in Iraq and<br />

today in Afghanistan brought a new challenge to a newlyformed<br />

JIEDDO in protecting U.S. and coalition warfighters.<br />

Made from a short length of steel or PVC pipe packed<br />

with explosives, EFPs are a sealed projectile capped with<br />

a concave copper disk. When the explosives detonate,<br />

the blast energy inverts the copper plate into a ragged<br />

slug traveling more than a mile per second and capable of<br />

punching through tank armor 300 feet away. Using passive<br />

infrared (PIR) sensors that detect motion by responding to<br />

changes in temperature — like that created by the engine of<br />

a passing truck, EFPs don’t use radio frequencies as triggers<br />

and, therefore, are invulnerable to electronic jamming.<br />

By May 2006, the effectiveness and frequency of EFP attacks<br />

had proved so devastating that JIEDDO introduced the first<br />

of two variations on its Rhino PIR and counter-PIR explosive<br />

advance-trigger system. Funding an expedient solution<br />

developed in the field, JIEDDO created Rhino with the intent<br />

to defeat PIR-triggered IEDs utilizing a boom-mounted glow<br />

plug that causes PIR-initiated IEDs to detonate prior to their<br />

intended targets entering the kill zone. The Rhino glow plug<br />

— an electric heating element for warming diesel engines<br />

before ignition — is housed in a steel box on the end of a<br />

10-foot boom. Heat emitted from the glow plug triggers EFPtriggering<br />

PIR sensors, causing the weapon to discharge in<br />

advance of target acquisition.<br />

In response to Rhino, insurgents adjusted the firing angle<br />

of their EFPs so that the slug struck 10 feet behind the<br />

decoy. JIEDDO countered with a Rhino II variant, fitted on an<br />

adjustable-length boom that presents the glow plug to the<br />

EFP’s PIR trigger earlier than its Rhino counterpart, ensuring<br />

premature firing. Along with electronic jammers, Rhino II<br />

became standard on U.S. vehicles in Iraq.<br />

By late 2008, JIEDDO had funded and fielded more than<br />

16,000 second-generation Rhino II systems, also providing<br />

upgrade kits that included heat monitoring systems with<br />

safety and performance improvements. JIEDDO continues<br />

to fund an effort to develop and deliver Rhino systems (Rhino<br />

III) that will meet the unique terrain requirements of the<br />

Afghanistan theater of operations.<br />

For more info: www.jieddo.dod.mil<br />

30 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Rugged on the Move<br />

Tactical ATVs:<br />

Mobile, Unmanned, Mission-Versatile<br />

By Kevin Hunter, A&M Editor<br />

PFM Manufacturing, Inc. of Townsend, Montana manufactures<br />

the Land Tamer 6x6 class of commercial grade, low-impact,<br />

amphibious, remote access All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) that provide<br />

mobility capabilities for military tactical operations. Selected as the<br />

platform of choice for the Squad Mission Support System (SMSS)<br />

under development and in conjunction with Lockheed Martin, this<br />

autonomous platform is expected to be workhorse for a squad<br />

of soldiers and is expected to see real action in Afghanistan by<br />

the end of 2011. On the light ATV side, Phoenix International has<br />

introduced the Prowler Light Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle (LTATV)<br />

configuration versatility in a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS)<br />

platform capable of light tactical military missions in ISR, mobile<br />

communications, assault, or search and rescue.<br />

Multi-medium Capable<br />

Since 1998, PFM has been manufacturing the Land Tamer®<br />

to fill the need for a vehicle that will stand up to the commercial<br />

applications. This vehicle was designed from the ground up for<br />

heavy duty use. The Land Tamer is in use year around from the<br />

Arctic Circle to the Equator in all types of commercial applications<br />

in all types of terrain. A robust commercial grade amphibious<br />

vehicle, Land Tamer can be used as an ATV, boat, snow coach,<br />

and tractor.<br />

The Land Tamer RS (Reduced Size) 8x8 is a smaller version of<br />

the larger standard sized units, and can fit inside the V-22 Osprey<br />

with minor modifications. All Land Tamer vehicles feature our<br />

hydraulic/gear drive system requiring minimal maintenance.<br />

Land Tamer’s Water Propulsion Unit is powered from the vehicles<br />

built in hydraulic drive system. The 9” hydraulically driven propeller<br />

can be raised, lowered and steered from the driver’s seat. Speeds<br />

of 5-10 mph on water can be attained depending on cargo load.<br />

Quick installation and removal of the Propulsion System can be<br />

achieved in 1 minute or less and the vehicle can be used as a boat.<br />

Staying on Track<br />

As part of the Land Tamer® Track System, Land Tamer utilizes a<br />

custom rubber track feature. Implementing a 22” wide track that<br />

fits over the existing tires, operators can achieve quick installation<br />

by just driving onto the track and inserting the connecting pin.<br />

“The main benefit of tracks is that they allow the vehicle to lower the<br />

vehicle ground pressure from the already low 3 psi, down to less<br />

than 1 psi,” said Patrick Miller, PFM Manufacturing. “This allows<br />

the vehicle to travel over deep snow that otherwise would require a<br />

snowmobile to travel.”<br />

The Land Tamer® unique drive system allows the installation of<br />

tracks over the tires for year-around use in any terrain type. This is a<br />

unique capability and strength of the Land Tamer®’s go-anywhere,<br />

anytime, easy mission configurability.<br />

For winter travel, Land Tamer® can be configured with the<br />

fully enclosed, heated cab option. This can also be used as an<br />

ambulance to evacuate casualties, or accommodate a crew of 10<br />

in seats or sleep 6 people in bunks. The current cab is covered<br />

with unbreakable Lexan plastic glass but can be configured with a<br />

lightweight armor if or when extra protection is required.<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 31


Maximize your response<br />

no matter how rugged<br />

the terrain.<br />

Turn your ATVs into rapid response vehicles with Intelagard’s<br />

SwiftCAF ATV system. Use the Intelagard SwiftRunner to<br />

turn your UTV into a dynamic response vehicle for maximum<br />

maneuverability and unparalleled capabilities.<br />

Powerful and effective, Intelagard equipment will quickly become<br />

your most versatile weapon of choice. Intelagard’s advanced CAF<br />

systems are self-contained, easy to use, and work equally well for fire<br />

suppression, hazmat remediation, and decontamination ops. These<br />

multi-asset systems were designed to switch between applications<br />

quickly and with few adjustments.<br />

Contact Intelagard today at 303.309.6309 or visit us<br />

at www.intelagard.com


Unmanned Option<br />

With a flip of as switch, Land Tamer offers operators an optional<br />

Light Tactical (LT) Remote Control System which allows the vehicle<br />

to be driven remotely as an unmanned platform. This benefit allows<br />

the vehicle to do dangerous jobs without endangering a driver.<br />

“The benefit of the optional 3-Point Hitch System is that Land<br />

Tamer® can be used as a remotely-operated tractor and a complete<br />

mobile power source,” said Miller. “The Category 1, 3 Point Hitch<br />

accepts any off-the-shelf farm and construction implements such<br />

as an earth moving blade, back hoe, mobile power generator or<br />

other equipment enabling a combat engineer capability in a light<br />

tactical platform. If desired, a remotely-controlled mine sweeping<br />

device could be attached.”<br />

Versatile Utility<br />

Phoenix International commercially introduced the industry’s<br />

first”quad”ATV with rack and pinion steering (no handlebars),<br />

automotive controls and a roll cage (now popularly called a Roll<br />

Over Protection System, or ROPS) in June 2002. An adaptation<br />

of this unique concept was made by a single recreational ATV<br />

manufacturer late in 2004 followed by others in 2006.<br />

mission equipped immediately upon ramp down - without any<br />

vehicle modification, disassembly, change or adjustment.<br />

Mobility and Durability<br />

Designed to operate with tires under the most demanding offroad<br />

and rugged terrain conditions, Prowler’s extreme duty<br />

double reinforced rim wheels do not dent, bend, twist or break.<br />

Prowler’s heavy duty undercarriage skid plate system can support<br />

the entire vehicle on a single point of contact. This means that if<br />

“high centered”, the vehicle needs only to be rocked with all wheel<br />

drive locked to pull off of a “hang up” point. All Prowler surfaces are<br />

industrial powder coated, not painted, for durability and long life.<br />

The Prowler platform design makes all routine service and<br />

maintenance points easily accessible for service without special<br />

tools, equipment or disassembly. Major engine and drive train<br />

parts and service is available from dealers worldwide. Effective<br />

operational capacity and acceptable mishap risk assessment<br />

within the constraints of potential mission requirements throughout<br />

the life cycle of Prowler platforms was and remains a critical factor<br />

in their design and evolution.<br />

contact@tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

The Prowler Light All-Terrain Vehicle (LTATV) was purposely<br />

designed as a commercially-available vehicle to provide reliable<br />

performance and endurance in the most demanding, inhospitable<br />

and harsh terrain encountered, and in any environment. The<br />

Prowler’s configuration versatility in a commercial-off-the-shelf<br />

(COTS) platform makes the platform a capable light tactical<br />

solution for military missions in ISR, mobile communications,<br />

assault, or search and rescue, as well as its similar domestic<br />

security patrol and emergency response vehicle (ERV) wildfire and<br />

rescue applications.<br />

Tactical Test Ready<br />

In military tactical applications, the Prowler is easily deployed,<br />

capable and nimble in hostile environments and is multi-mission<br />

configurable. Unlike any generic ATV-derived vehicle, the vehicle<br />

is built to provide maximum operator protection, enhance driver<br />

control, improve crew safety and reduce operator fatigue.<br />

The Prowler’s rugged design and construction incorporates roll<br />

cage and chrome alloy steel tubing components that won’t bend,<br />

crimp, dent or break versus typical ATV plastic panels and common<br />

steel stampings welded together. In 4WD, Prowler’s wheels have<br />

power delivered simultaneously to each wheel all the time, unlike<br />

modified recreational vehicles which only revert to 4-wheel drive if<br />

a rear wheel slips or spins. The Prowler keeps its engine engaged<br />

with the drive train at all times, with constant engine braking under<br />

all driving conditions. This means that the wheels turn slower as<br />

the engine revs lower, improving driver control and lengthening the<br />

life of its brakes.<br />

As well as transportable within most cargo Helos and fixed wing<br />

aircraft, Prowlers can be backed into the MV/CV-22 Tilt-Rotor<br />

OSPREY aircraft - ready to drive straight out, fully crewed and<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 33


Unmanned & Beyond<br />

Unmanned Accompaniment<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> is fielding and the latest in small<br />

unmanned ground vehicle (SUGV) technology to<br />

provide the warfighter with critical mission support.<br />

Submitted by <strong>PEO</strong> GCS Public Affairs<br />

The Program Executive Office Ground Combat Systems (<strong>PEO</strong><br />

GCS) Robotic Systems Joint Project Office (RS JPO) is responsible for<br />

managing the development, acquisition, testing, systems integration,<br />

product improvement, and fielding of robotic systems for the joint<br />

warfighter. Systems include the M-160 Mechanical Anti-Personnel<br />

Mine Clearing System (MAPMCS), TALON Family of Systems (IIIB and<br />

IV), PackBot, FasTac, MARCBot, and the Small Unmanned Ground<br />

Vehicle (SUGV-310) otherwise known as the Mini-EOD. General<br />

improvements to robotic systems include increased agility, mobility,<br />

SWaP-C (Space, weight, Power and Cooling) and transportability.<br />

Small Utility, Big Capability<br />

The TALON is considered the workhorse of the ‘small’ robot family<br />

weighing in at 115 - 140 pounds. The unmanned ground vehicle<br />

(UGV) is a robotically controlled system that provides the warfighter<br />

with the ability to visually identify both stand-alone and vehicle-borne<br />

improvised explosive devices (IEDs) from a safe range. The TALON<br />

is also capable of supporting explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) and<br />

provides additional engineer support that may not involve IEDs. The<br />

TALON is equipped with an extension arm, cameras, microphone<br />

loudspeaker, and a manipulator arm with a gripper. The infrared and<br />

white-light illuminated cameras provide the operator the ability to<br />

conduct operations in day or night conditions.<br />

TALON is used in conjunction with Mine Resistant Ambush-<br />

Protected (MRAP) vehicles and other ground assets to support route<br />

clearance missions. The TALON robot is used to visually inspect and<br />

interrogate suspect terrain anomalies, debris or other impediments.<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> GCS does not manage the MRAP systems. They are managed<br />

by Program Executive Office Combat Systems & Combat Support<br />

Systems (<strong>PEO</strong> CS & CSS).<br />

TALON RDS is managed by PM Assured Mobility Systems under<br />

<strong>PEO</strong> CS & CSS. The RDS enables transportation, deployment and<br />

operation of the TALON from within the host vehicle. It serves to<br />

alleviate the need for Soldiers to dismount to deploy and operate the<br />

TALON.<br />

Light Might for the War Fight<br />

The XM1216 SUGV is a lightweight (32 lb), man-portable,<br />

unmanned ground vehicle capable of conducting operations in urban<br />

terrain environments like tunnels, sewers, and caves. In order to<br />

minimize exposure of the warfighter to potential hazards, the SUGV<br />

provides an unmanned capability for manpower-intensive or high-risk<br />

missions such as IED and Chemical/Toxic Materials reconnaissance,<br />

as well as urban intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR).<br />

Initial fielding of the SUGV is slated for April 2011.<br />

For more info: www.peogcs.army.mil<br />

34 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Emerging Forecast / AFMC<br />

Global Reach, Global Power,<br />

and Global Vigilance<br />

The U.S. Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) is<br />

DoD’s primary organization for the development,<br />

fielding, and integrated life cycle management of<br />

materiel critical to joint combat forces at home<br />

and worldwide.<br />

Submitted by AFMC Public Affairs<br />

The U.S. Air Force Materiel Command’s mission is to deliver<br />

war-winning expeditionary capabilities to the warfighter. It does<br />

this by developing, fielding and sustaining the material that allows<br />

the U.S. Air Force to remain the most capable, flexible, and<br />

dominant military force in the world -- providing technology and<br />

systems that enable “Global Reach, Global Power, and Global<br />

Vigilance.”<br />

The command provides and sustains everything from fifthgeneration<br />

fighters like the F-22 and the F-35 to the new Airman<br />

Battle Uniform, supporting combat forces around the world.<br />

AFMC’s priorities include continuing to strengthen the<br />

command’s role in supporting the nuclear enterprise; implementing<br />

effective and efficient Integrated Life Cycle Management to support<br />

the warfighter; recruiting, training and retaining a high-performing<br />

workforce; nurturing and protecting our people and families; and<br />

being good stewards of government resources.<br />

Capabilities<br />

AFMC‘s greatest asset is its people. The command employs a<br />

highly professional and skilled command work force of more than<br />

83,000 military and civilian employees. They are organized into<br />

four broad mission areas: research and development, acquisition<br />

management, test and evaluation, and sustainment.<br />

In encompassing cradle-to-grave life-cycle management of<br />

warfighting systems, AFMC impacts the full spectrum of Air Force<br />

capabilities. In short, AFMC is responsible for equipping the Air<br />

Force so it can aim high and fly, fight and win today.<br />

Major Air Force Materiel<br />

Command Organizations<br />

AFMC is headquartered at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base,<br />

OH. This is an appropriate home as the Wright Brothers perfected<br />

powered flight less than 2 miles from the Headquarters building<br />

— thus serving as a constant reminder of the innovative spirit the<br />

command strives to embody.<br />

In addition to its Headquarters, AFMC is made up of the<br />

following centers and organizations around the country:<br />

AFRL<br />

AFMC’s Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), responsible for<br />

science and technology, includes the Air Force Office of Scientific<br />

Research as well as nine technology directorates – Air Vehicles,<br />

Space Vehicles, Munitions, Sensors, Propulsion, Information,<br />

Human Effectiveness, Materials and Manufacturing Technology,<br />

and Directed Energy.<br />

Overarching science and technology priorities -- addressed<br />

by the laboratory -- include supporting the current fight while<br />

advancing breakthrough science and technology (S&T), developing<br />

balanced S&T investment strategy and portfolio, retaining critical<br />

competencies required to address the full range of Air Force S&T<br />

needs and ensuring that the S&T program is integrated into the Air<br />

Force requirements and programming process. They also include<br />

increasing emphasis on S&T that will reduce cyber vulnerabilities<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 35


Emerging Forecast / AFMC<br />

while emphasizing mission assurance; improving sustainment,<br />

affordability and availability of legacy systems; reducing energy<br />

dependence; enabling long-range strike; delivering autonomous<br />

systems envisioned in the Air Force’s New Horizons plans; and<br />

enhancing decision-making with improved situational awareness.<br />

Examples of AFRL’s ongoing and successful work include<br />

achievements with alternative fuels for Air Force fleets,<br />

development of laser technology for use on large aircraft, and<br />

development of a phased array antenna designed to maximize the<br />

use of commercial off-the-shelf components to communicate with<br />

satellites from the surface of the earth.<br />

Product Centers<br />

AFMC has three product centers, each of which is responsible<br />

for transitioning technologies into systems ready to be deployed<br />

to meet users’ needs. The centers are charged with developing<br />

and managing the acquisition of militarily effective and sustainable<br />

weapon systems:<br />

AAC: Air Armament Center (AAC), located at Eglin AFB, Fla.,<br />

serves as the focal point for all Air Force armament. The center is<br />

responsible for development, acquisition, testing, and deployment<br />

Spec Ops West 2011<br />

Warfighter Expo<br />

<br />

5th Annual<br />

SpecOps Warfighter Expo WEST<br />

May 10-12, 2011<br />

Joint Base Lewis-McChord<br />

FREE EXPO<br />

for all active duty military personnel!<br />

Tactical Equipment<br />

Medical Equipment<br />

Weapons<br />

Training Companies<br />

• Many new products, services<br />

and technologies!!<br />

Presented By<br />

SIGN UP NOW to attend or exhibit<br />

www.specopswest.com<br />

919-573-6108<br />

Warfighter Sponsor<br />

of all air-delivered weapons. It plans, direct and conduct test<br />

and evaluation of U.S. and allied air airmament, navigation and<br />

guidance systems, as well as command and control systems.<br />

They also support the largest base mobility commitment in the<br />

Air Force.<br />

ASC: Aeronautical Systems Center (ASC) is located at Wright-<br />

Patterson AFB, OH. The center designs, develops and delivers<br />

dominant, war-winning airpower capabilities for the Air Force.<br />

Its portfolio of capabilities includes fighter/attack, long-range<br />

strike, reconnaissance, mobility, agile combat support, special<br />

operations forces, training, unmanned aircraft systems, human<br />

systems integration, and installation support<br />

ESC: Electronic Systems Center (ESC), located at Hanscom<br />

AFB, Mass., is the world leader in net-centric command and control;<br />

communications; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance;<br />

and combat support systems. These integrated systems help<br />

the Air Force maintain all its daily operations across the globe<br />

and provide the situational awareness enabling battlespace<br />

dominance for U.S. and allied commanders.<br />

Examples of work done by the product centers include<br />

development and acquisition of the MQ-9 Reaper unmanned<br />

aerial vehicle (UAV). Aeronautical Systems Center manages<br />

development of the Reaper, and has been accelerating its<br />

acquisition to meet increasing requirements. The 42nd Attack<br />

Squadron at Creech AFB, Nev., recently received the first MQ-9<br />

Reaper nearly a year ahead of schedule, exceeding Air Combat<br />

Command requirements. Together with the MQ-1 Predator, the<br />

Reaper quickly became a workhorse for our warfighters.<br />

In another example, AFMC established the Aeronautical<br />

System Center’s Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures program<br />

in response to the man-portable anti-aircraft missiles threat to<br />

intra-theater airlift. Many C-130s and C-17s aircraft are now<br />

LAIRCM-equipped.<br />

The Space Fence program is another example of the work<br />

done by AFMC’s product centers. Managed by the Electronic<br />

Systems Center, the Space Fence will deliver a system of<br />

geographically dispersed ground-based sensors to track space<br />

debris and provide timely assessment of space events. The total<br />

anticipated value of the program is more than $3.5 billion.<br />

AFMC also developed the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile<br />

(JASSM), the nation’s only stealthy, conventional, precision,<br />

launch-and-leave, standoff missile capable of being launched<br />

from fighter and bomber aircraft. Developed at the Air Armament<br />

Center, JASSM is 2,000-pound class weapon with a highly lethal<br />

combination penetrator/blast fragmentation warhead. It cruises<br />

autonomously in adverse weather, day or night, using a state-ofthe-art<br />

infrared seeker in addition to the anti-jam GPS to find a<br />

specific aimpoint on the target.<br />

Expo attendance is open to military, federal, state and local government and defense industry personnel that are actively engaged in defense and security<br />

related operations. A valid government issued photo ID is required for entry. No entry to anyone under 18 years of age unless on active military duty.<br />

Admittance to SpecOps West is at the sole discretion of show organizers.<br />

36 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


C<br />

Emerging Forecast / AFMC<br />

Test and Evaluation Centers<br />

AFMC ensures its systems will meet the demands of the military<br />

environment through extensive test and evaluation provided by its<br />

test centers. The command operates two dedicated test centers<br />

and a separate test wing where it pushes aircraft, spacecraft, and<br />

air armament to the limit.<br />

These unique facilities research, evaluate, and test developing<br />

air and space capabilities in both controlled and real-world<br />

environments:<br />

AFFTC: Air Force Flight Test Center (AFFTC), located at<br />

Edwards AFB, CA, is the world’s premier flight test facility, dating<br />

back to the days of Chuck Yeager in the Bell X-1. They’ve tested<br />

and evaluated manned and unmanned systems such as the F-22A,<br />

the X-45 Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle, Global Hawk, Airborne<br />

Laser, and the F-35. AFFTC is also the home of the United States<br />

Air Force Test Pilot School. Although renowned for open air flight<br />

testing of manned aircraft, AFFTC also is paving the future in testing<br />

of electronic warfare systems, UAVs, net-centric warfare, directed<br />

energy, and hypersonics.<br />

AEDC: Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) at<br />

Arnold AFB, TN., operates pre-flight test facilities capable of<br />

simulating flight conditions from sea level to the edge of space<br />

and speeds from zero through Mach 14. AEDC has nearly 60<br />

propulsion and aerodynamic wind tunnels (including one that’s<br />

the largest in the world), rocket and turbine engine test cells, and<br />

space environmental chambers. Nearly every U.S. military aircraft,<br />

both military and commercial aircraft engines and many satellites<br />

systems have been tested at AEDC since it opened in 1951.<br />

46 TW: The 46th Test Wing at Eglin AFB, FL., is the primary test<br />

facility for all Air Force armament. It operates unique climatic labs<br />

capable of testing airframes covering the full spectrum of weather<br />

conditions from hot, dry deserts, to icy, sub-zero tundra – and<br />

virtually every combination in between. The wing is also responsible<br />

for testing systems against cyber attack.<br />

Other examples of work done by the Test and Evaluation Centers<br />

include test and evaluation of the Airborne Laser (ABL). In 2007,<br />

AFMC executed the AFFTC’s ABL test program and successfully<br />

demonstrated effective firing of the ABL from an airborne-platform<br />

as well as its ability to track airborne targets –achieving two major<br />

program milestones stepping closer to one of tomorrow’s critical<br />

directed energy capabilities.<br />

The Towed Airborne Plume missile simulator (TAPS) is the<br />

product of Arnold Engineering Development Center, where it was<br />

Key Marine Commands will be on-hand to learn about cutting-edge<br />

products and services including: ground combat arms; equipment and<br />

systems for operational support units; and information technology systems<br />

and services designed for the USMC market.<br />

The Latest Technology from exhibitors displaying bold new<br />

prototypes, computer simulations, software and equipment that will enable<br />

the Marine Corps to meet the challenges of the 21st century.<br />

Come Together to Learn about the nation’s advances in elite<br />

defense products, equipment and services being designed and produced<br />

to meet the changing needs of tomorrow’s USMC!<br />

To showcase your products and services, please contact:<br />

Charlie Baisley at 703.812.2741 charles.baisley@nielsen.com<br />

Jaymie Amos-Nielsen at 980.328.8801 jaymie.nielsen@nielsen.com<br />

http://www.marinemilitaryexpos.com<br />

Endorsed by<br />

MAKE IT YOUR MISSION<br />

April 27 -28, 2011<br />

Camp Lejeune, NC<br />

Sponsored by<br />

Co-Sponsored by<br />

MARINE<br />

SY<br />

S<br />

YST<br />

YS<br />

EMS CO<br />

CO<br />

M<br />

MMAMA<br />

CORPS<br />

AN<br />

AND<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 37


Emerging Forecast / AFMC<br />

both built and tested. TAPS was created to test early warning<br />

sensors on military aircraft, thus helping to protect low-flying military<br />

aircraft operating in hostile air space.<br />

Sustainment Centers<br />

As AFMC develops and tests new weapons systems, its people<br />

continue monitoring and shepherding those systems to make sure<br />

they are maintained and sustained throughout their service lives.<br />

The sustainment mission is even more demanding today as the Air<br />

Force’s aircraft fleet is the oldest in history, with an average age of<br />

25 years, and many well over 40 years old.<br />

To carry out this mission, AFMC manages several sustainment<br />

centers -- highly industrialized complexes focused on providing<br />

comprehensive depot-level maintenance and repair of all current<br />

and future USAF air and space systems. These complexes include<br />

three air logistics centers (ALCs), the Air Force Nuclear Weapons<br />

Center and Air Force Global Logistics Support Center.<br />

ALCs include the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and<br />

Regeneration Group at Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ, which reports<br />

to the air logistics center in Oklahoma and serves as the DoD’s<br />

single repository for stored aircraft. ALCs also provide support at<br />

numerous field locations both in country and overseas:<br />

OC-ALC: Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center (OC-ALC) at<br />

Tinker AFB, OK., manages logistics support mainly for large<br />

aircraft, such as the B-1, B-2, B-52, KC-10, C/KC-135, E-3<br />

and E-4B aircraft. In addition, the ALC manages a number<br />

of contract logistics support aircraft, including the VC-25A, or<br />

Air Force One. It is also the Air Force Center of Excellence for<br />

sustainment of all engines.<br />

OO-ALC: Ogden Air Logistics Center (OO-ALC) at Hill AFB,<br />

UT, provides worldwide support for aircraft such as the F-16,<br />

F-22, T-37, T-38, C-130 and A-10, as well as ICBMs. The<br />

center also manages and repairs a wide range of components<br />

such as landing gear, rocket motors, avionics and other<br />

related aerospace items. It has also taken over storage for all<br />

Department of Defense retired aircraft through the 309th Aircraft<br />

Maintenance and Regeneration Group at Davis-Monthan AFB,<br />

AZ.<br />

WR-ALC: Warner Robins Air Logistics Center (WR-ALC) at<br />

Robins AFB, GA, provides depot maintenance support for large<br />

transport aircraft such as the C-5, C-17 and C-130; supports<br />

the U-2 and F-15; and helicopters and electronic warfare<br />

systems.<br />

PrOMOTINg NATIONAL SECUrITy SINCE 1919<br />

Maximize<br />

Your Reach<br />

& Budget!<br />

Interact with Military Users,<br />

Decision Makers from DoD,<br />

DHS & Other government<br />

Agencies<br />

For more information on<br />

exhibiting at these and other<br />

NDIA expositions contact:<br />

Luellen Hoffman<br />

Director of Exhibits<br />

Phone: 703-247-9460<br />

Email: lhoffman@ndia.org<br />

2011 Joint Service Power<br />

Expo – #1670<br />

“Smaller, Better, Greener –<br />

Reducing the Energy<br />

Footprint”<br />

May 2-5, 2011 Myrtle Beach, SC<br />

Key officials from all levels of<br />

government responsible for setting<br />

requirements and fielding means<br />

of portable power will be there.<br />

Global Explosive Ordnance<br />

Disposal Conference &<br />

Exhibition – #1950<br />

“Attacking the Network”<br />

May 3-5, 2011 Ft. Walton Beach, FL<br />

Produced by NDIA with the Office<br />

of the Secretary of Defense Under<br />

Secretary for Policy, Assistant<br />

Secretary of Defense for Special<br />

Operations Low Intensity Conflict<br />

& Interdependent Capabilities<br />

(SOLIC & IC) and the Explosive<br />

Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Memorial<br />

Foundation.<br />

2011 Ground Robotic<br />

Capabilities Conference &<br />

Exhibition – #1380<br />

“Saving Lives, Saving $ – Are<br />

Robot Recruits the Answer?”<br />

March 22-24, 2011 Orlando, FL<br />

This conference provides the<br />

opportunity to network with<br />

government, military and industry<br />

leaders in the robotics world.<br />

For more information on these and other NDIA conferences visit us on the web at www.ndia.org<br />

38 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com


Emerging Forecast / AFMC<br />

AFMC’s ALCs have won numerous awards for excellence<br />

in industrial operations management and are leading the way in<br />

ensuring aircraft are available and mission ready for the warfighter.<br />

AFNWC: Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center (AFNWC), at<br />

Kirtland Air Force Base, NM, serves as the command’s Center of<br />

Expertise for nuclear weapon systems. The center is critical to<br />

ensuring the safety, security, and reliability of nuclear weapons to<br />

support the National Command Structure. It performs this role<br />

through acquisition, modernization, and sustainment of nuclear<br />

system programs for both DoD and the Department of Energy.<br />

The AFNWC serves as a single manager for lifecycle support,<br />

stockpile support and nuclear engineering. It was established<br />

in 2008 and reached initial operational capability in January<br />

2011. Creation of the AFNWC consolidated alignment of people,<br />

training, and resources.<br />

people and events that comprise the Air Force storyline, from the<br />

beginnings of military flight to today’s current operations.<br />

Along with more than 480 volunteers, the museum has a<br />

professional staff of nearly 100 that include education, research,<br />

exhibits, restoration, collection management, special events,<br />

plans and programs, and public affairs divisions.<br />

For more info: www.afmc.af.mil<br />

For your complimentary<br />

subscription, please<br />

visit our website at<br />

tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

AFGLSC: Air Force Global Logistics Support Center<br />

(AFGLSC), located at Scott Air Force Base, IL, is the single Air<br />

Force Supply Chain Management owner and provides enterprise<br />

planning and execution, global command and control, and supply<br />

chain enabling functions.<br />

The center is comprised of more than 4,800 people at six<br />

operating locations: Langley, Hill, Robins, Scott, Tinker, and<br />

Wright-Patterson Air Force bases. This includes networking<br />

logistics experts who link wholesale and retail logistics, as well<br />

as integrate and oversee all logistic processes, technology and<br />

resources to deliver end-to-end warfighter support with increased<br />

velocity and reduced cost.<br />

Specialized Units<br />

AFSAC: Air Force Security Assistance Center (AFSAC) is<br />

located at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH. The center<br />

is the Air Force’s security assistance agent for administering<br />

$92.7 billion in foreign military sales to more than 96 countries,<br />

operating more than 6,000 aircraft and other weapon systems.<br />

Along with this, AFSAC is responsible for sustaining aerospace<br />

capability for friendly foreign forces in support of U.S. national<br />

security objectives. Within the center, about 420 military, civilian<br />

and contractor personnel and foreign liaison officers are helping<br />

to build partner Air Force capabilities, contributing to strong<br />

relationships and interoperability.<br />

NMUSAF: The National Museum of the U.S. Air Force<br />

(NMUSAF) is located in Dayton, Ohio, next to Wright-Patterson<br />

Air Force Base. The museum is the service’s national institution<br />

for preserving and presenting the Air Force story. Each year more<br />

than 1 million visitors come to the museum to learn about the<br />

mission, history and evolving capabilities of America’s Air Force.<br />

The museum is the world’s largest and oldest military aviation<br />

museum featuring more than 400 aerospace vehicles amid more<br />

than 17 acres of indoor exhibit space. Thousands of personal<br />

artifacts, photographs and documents further highlight the<br />

IQPC-NY ArmorCon AM Ad 2.1:Layout 1 24/02/11 4:45 PM Page 1<br />

presents a training event:<br />

ARMORCON<br />

Military Armor Conference<br />

June 6-9, 2011 |<br />

Sponsored By:<br />

Sheraton Premiere at<br />

Tysons <strong>Corner</strong> Vienna, VA<br />

Stay Connected!<br />

Visit www.ArmorConExpo.com/AM today to:<br />

• Register for the event<br />

• Gain free access to relevant podcasts, videos, articles, interviews,<br />

whitepapers, and past presentations at our resource center<br />

• Download the complete program agenda<br />

•<br />

View the complete speaker roster and biographies<br />

•<br />

Learn more about the location, venue, and hotel discounts<br />

• Plus much more!<br />

Mention promo code IUS_AAM & receive 20% off<br />

the 4 day standard fee - Register Online Today!<br />

TM<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com Armor & Mobility March 2011 | 39


Ad Index<br />

Features<br />

Calendar of Events<br />

Commander’s <strong>Corner</strong><br />

Gen. Duncan McNabb<br />

Commander<br />

U.S. Transportation Command<br />

Armor Evolution: Training Critical to Success<br />

As a follow-on article to the March feature<br />

entitled “Evolution of Armor in Modern<br />

Combat”, A&M offers readers a look at how<br />

evolving armor training requirements are<br />

enabling units such as the Marine Corps’ Delta<br />

Company, 1st Tank Battalion to meet threats on<br />

the future battlefield.<br />

Tactical Radio C2<br />

The U.S. <strong>Army</strong> is employing the latest in<br />

handheld digital radio technology in support<br />

of enhanced command and control across a<br />

brigade combat team-led force structure.<br />

Ground Soldier Ensemble<br />

U.S. <strong>Army</strong> dismounted combat soldiers may<br />

soon be wearing the most advanced body<br />

armor system in the world, complete with<br />

hi-tech comms, situational awareness, and<br />

C4ISR capabilities.<br />

Recurring Highlights<br />

Strategic Leadership: <strong>PEO</strong> EIS<br />

BRAC Spotlight: Ft. Belvoir/DTRA<br />

Unmanned & Beyond: EOD<br />

Asymmetric Warfare Developments:<br />

<strong>Army</strong> AWG<br />

Rugged on the Move: <strong>Army</strong> Marketplace<br />

March 28-29<br />

Soldier Technology<br />

Ft. Hood, TX<br />

www.idga.com<br />

April 6-7<br />

Reconnaissance Summit<br />

Ft. Benning, GA<br />

www.fbcinc.com<br />

April 19-20<br />

Tactical Vehicles Summit<br />

Alexandria, VA<br />

www.idga.com<br />

2011 May<br />

40 | Armor & Mobility March 2011<br />

April 27-28<br />

Marine South<br />

Camp Lejeune, NC<br />

www.marinemilitaryexpos.com<br />

May 3-4<br />

Joint Service Power Expo<br />

Myrtle Beach, SC<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

May 3-5<br />

Global EOD Conference<br />

Ft. Walton Beach, FL<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

Emerging Forecast<br />

U.S. Special Operations<br />

Command<br />

The U.S. Special Operations<br />

Command (USSOCOM) is<br />

DoD’s top organization in<br />

the joint special operations<br />

forces (SOF) community,<br />

synchronizes the planning<br />

of global counterterrorism<br />

operations in defense of U.S.<br />

interests worldwide.<br />

Bonus Distribution<br />

SpecOps Warfighters West<br />

Joint Warfighers Conf & Expo<br />

Military Armor Protection<br />

Joint CBRNE<br />

Special Ops Industry Conf<br />

Command & Control<br />

Sustainment Symposium<br />

ArmorCon Expo<br />

May 9-12<br />

2011 Environment, Energy<br />

& Sustainability Expo<br />

New Orleans, LA<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

May 17-19<br />

2011 SOFIC<br />

Tampa, FL<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

May 17-19<br />

FPED VIII<br />

Stafford, VA<br />

www.fped8.org<br />

Abaxis.................................................. 19<br />

www.abaxis.com<br />

Combat Medical Systems.................... 10<br />

www.combatmedicalsystems.com<br />

FBC...................................................... 33<br />

www.fbcinc.com<br />

Gamber-Johnson................................. 25<br />

www.gamberjohnson.com/federal_<br />

military<br />

IDGA..................................................... 39<br />

www.ArmorConExpo.com/AM<br />

Intelagard............................................. 32<br />

www.intelagard.com<br />

ITT........................................................C3<br />

www.itt.com/vsas<br />

L-3 – MPRI........................................... 12<br />

www.mpri.com<br />

Loadstar Group.................................... 36<br />

www.specopswest.com<br />

L-3 – RCCS..........................................C4<br />

www.L-3com.com/rcc<br />

Marine South........................................ 37<br />

www.nielson.com<br />

Military Systems Group........................ 17<br />

www.milsysgroup.com<br />

Joint Service Power Expo.................... 18<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

NDIA..................................................... 38<br />

www.ndia.org<br />

TEA.......................................................C2<br />

www.teaheadsets.com<br />

Textron................................................... 7<br />

www.textronmarineandland.com<br />

VMR Electronics..................................... 3<br />

www.vmrelectronics.com<br />

www.tacticaldefensemedia.com<br />

The advertisers index is provided as a service to our readers. Tactical Defense Media cannot be held responsible for discrepancies due to last-minute changes or alterations.


Enhanced situational awareness is not new. But until now, getting the full picture meant bolting<br />

on a tangle of equipment, or sticking one’s neck out. Literally. With ITT’s Visual Situation<br />

Awareness System (VSAS), warfighters benefit from a 360º display of hostile surroundings while<br />

integrating a full spectrum of complementary technologies, such as sniper detection, Google Maps TM , communications,<br />

night vision, and more. Now warfighters can see more and risk less, thanks to VSAS. More at itt.com/vsas.<br />

They’re already sticking their necks out for us.<br />

No point in them sticking their heads out too.<br />

E l e c t r o n i c S y s t e m s • G e o s p a t i a l S y s t e m s • I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m s • M i s s i o n S y s t e m s<br />

ITT, the Engineered Blocks logo, and ENGINEERED FOR LIFE are registered trademarks of ITT Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc., and are used under license. ©2011, ITT Corporation.


SENSE.<br />

EXECUTE.<br />

PREVAIL.<br />

L-3’s Ruggedized Command & Control Network (RCCN)<br />

Putting Situational Awareness and Mission System Management<br />

Back Into the Hands of the Warfighter<br />

L-3 integrates its proven sensors, controls and displays into a rapidly reconfigurable<br />

data distribution and control system. The RCCN is a deployed, digital vehicle<br />

backbone network that provides C 4 ISR and sensor connectivity on any fighting<br />

vehicle. By offering the benefits of modularity, scalability and true “plug and play”<br />

operation, the RCCN enables vehicles to be configured based on your mission. To<br />

learn more, visit L-3com.com/rcc.<br />

RCCS<br />

L-3com.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!