REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ... REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
Table 7: Actual and desired role of NGOs in regularisation processes/ design of regularisation policies NGO/Country Assessment of own role/ role of NGOs AT Krankenhaus (Hospital) der Barmherzigen Bürder – Austria - Compensates for lack of state policies (access to health care) - AT BE BE CZ Organisation Diakonie Flüchtlingsdienst (Refugee Service) - AT Centre des Immigrés Namur- Luxembourg ASBL (Antenne de Libramont) Samahan ng mga Manggagawang Pilipino sa Belgium - BE Counselling Centre for Citizenship / Civil and Human Rights - CZ - NGOs should help straightforward and spontaneously without asking - NGOs should be involved in the process of identifying target groups of regularisations and in bodies adjudicating or advising on regularisations - NGOs should highlight problems regarding the asylum system and regularisation practices, e.g. through engaging in a dialogue with the responsible minister, critical analysis of policy measures, pointing out alternatives - NGOs need not be formally involved in decision-making - NGO successful track record of providing advise to applicants, as all 20 persons assisted by the NGO have been regularised - NGOs being a civil society initiative can support, supplement and complement efforts of other civil society actors and government so as to make sound policies that take into account the different specificities of groups at the grassroots level. - NGOs can be actors for the implementation, monitoring and follow-up and eventually in evaluation of the policy, programme and/or mechanisms of regularisation. - NGO have a monitoring function - NGOs should play an active role in formulating migration policy CZ Counselling Centre for Refugees / Organization for Aid to Refugees - CZ DE NL PT Flüchtlingsrat im Kreis Viersen e.V. - GE Stichting LOS(Landelijk Ongedocumenteerden Steunpunt) - NL AMI (International Medical Assistance) - PT - NGOs should monitoring, evaluate and criticize government policies - Not much success to change policies but major success to initiate a parliamentary debate on regularisation and irregular migration - Government authorities see NGOs as unequal partners despite their knowledge on the issue - NGOs should be seen as serious partners by the government - Contribution to the public debate - NGOs play an important role as a counterbalance to arguments of the government authorities which are related to regulatory issues - NGOs should be more involved in the process of legislation - Crucial role for the implementation of the last regularisation programme - regularisations are not possible without NGOs as partners - NGOs should be an instrument of mediation between the interests of immigrants and the policies to them created. - As non governmental entities, nor controllers, relatively to regularisation policies and immigrants in irregular situation, NGOs should assume an educative and sensitising role 78
NGO/Country Assessment of own role/ role of NGOs PT Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) - PT - contribute to policy development. - monitor the implementation of regularisation policies - provide guidance to migrants regarding the process of regularisation. ES ACCEM: Atención y Acogida a Refugiados e Inmigrantes - ES Madrid - NGOs should be intermediators between immigrants and administration - NGOs should point out violations of recognised immigration laws - The proposals of NGOs should be taken into account regarding the formulation of regularisation policies ES Fundación Andalucía ACOGE - ES - The practical experiences of NGOs within their daily work should be taken into account - NGOs should point out if immigration laws are not respected ES Asociación Vida y Salud al Inmigrante Boliviano (AVISA) – ES Madrid -NGOs play a fundamental role with respect to the formulation of regularisation policy, as we are the ones who have contact with the immigrants. - NGOs should be involved at an early stage of policy development ES Iglesia Evangélica -ES - Through their daily practical experiences NGOs know the consequences of policy measures very well and ES Movimiento por la Paz, el Deasarme y la Libertad en Canarias (MPDLC) - ES ES Asociación Salud y Familia, UGT - ES IE Migrant Rights Council of Ireland, Dublin (MRCI) FR EU EU FR - SNPMPI – LA PASTORALE DES MIGRANTS Europäische Vereinigung von Juristinnen und Juristen für Demokratie und Menschrechte in der Welt e. V. (EJDM) European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Note: not all respondents completed the relevant sections of the questionnaires. should be consulted by government agencies - NGOs are doing the work different public administrations should do - NGOs should be more involved in respect to the formulation of immigration policies - It´s not possible that all Spanish NGOs play an important role in respect to the formulation of regularisation policy - Overall aim: promote the conditions for social and economic inclusion of undocumented migrant workers and their families, - through: direct support to undocumented migrant workers; lobbying at national and international level also by cooperating with other organisations; - research. - awareness raising and representation of the interests of undocumented migrant workers - Own role/position is a sensitive issues, since irregular migration is a highly contested issue also within the Church; - General role. Involvement of NGOs by government agencies often done as an alibi, not a dialogue, but a monologue. - Only little influence due to neglect of regularisation as a policy option on the one hand and due to a lack of involvement of NGOs. - NGOs should be involved in formulation and evaluation of regularisation policies - own lobbying regarding regularisation has not had a large impact, due to refusal of EU to address the issue of regularisation - NGOs are often the only actors providing services to undocumented migrants and hence have a major role to play - NGOs are well placed to provide inputs in policy debates and to monitor the effective and fair implementation of policies 79
- Page 33 and 34: Box 2: 3-tier earned regularisation
- Page 35 and 36: measures; it does address questions
- Page 37 and 38: 3.1.1 Regularisation Programmes Ove
- Page 39 and 40: Nine Member States provided details
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 3 Grants of regularised stat
- Page 43 and 44: Box 3: Regularisation policy in Swi
- Page 45 and 46: 3.2 Regularisation as a policy resp
- Page 47 and 48: Table 5: Comparative table of regul
- Page 49 and 50: case in Europe, alongside the more
- Page 51 and 52: that a year after regularisation so
- Page 53 and 54: treatment according to nationality,
- Page 55 and 56: iii. issues of advance planning iv.
- Page 57 and 58: iv. the requirement to appear in pe
- Page 59 and 60: denying residence permits to existi
- Page 61 and 62: efugees under the provisions of the
- Page 63 and 64: 4 Government positions on policy 15
- Page 65 and 66: 5 Positions of social actors 5.1 In
- Page 67 and 68: Since the 1990s - and in some count
- Page 69 and 70: live their lives without fear.” 1
- Page 71 and 72: admission policies. 181 The Danish
- Page 73 and 74: and useful, if planned and implemen
- Page 75 and 76: depend on (unskilled) immigrant lab
- Page 77 and 78: migration”. 209 In the opinion of
- Page 79 and 80: stresses that “economic immigrati
- Page 81 and 82: undocumented migrants by the Brusse
- Page 83: NGO/Country Main activities in rega
- Page 87 and 88: known that this makes them vulnerab
- Page 89 and 90: eaching reforms of the overall fram
- Page 91 and 92: Accord of March 2008 have not yet b
- Page 93 and 94: Table 8: Suggested target groups fo
- Page 95 and 96: policy measures that could be adopt
- Page 97 and 98: followed by the granting of any sta
- Page 99 and 100: for irregular migrants, while Italy
- Page 101 and 102: interpretations of the EU directive
- Page 103 and 104: considered to be “flexible, adapt
- Page 105 and 106: iii. Measures and sanctions against
- Page 107 and 108: of international protection, it is
- Page 109 and 110: 7.2 European Union approaches to il
- Page 111 and 112: immigration.” 321 Finally, the st
- Page 113 and 114: involve large numbers. Secondly, th
- Page 115 and 116: 8 Policy Options OPTION 1: REGULATI
- Page 117 and 118: initiative. In the case of permanen
- Page 119 and 120: Ultimately, a comprehensive definit
- Page 121 and 122: nor need it be seen as an endorseme
- Page 123 and 124: permits, Member States should take
- Page 125 and 126: OPTION 6: STRENGTHENING THE PRINCIP
- Page 127 and 128: Rationale and possible impact: Upon
- Page 129 and 130: information exchange could contribu
- Page 131 and 132: d) apprehension data should disting
- Page 133 and 134: OPTION 11: REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE
NGO/Country<br />
Assessment of own role/ role of NGOs<br />
PT Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) - PT - contribute to policy development. - monitor the implementation of regularisation policies<br />
- provide guidance to migrants regard<strong>in</strong>g the process of regularisation.<br />
ES ACCEM: Atención y Acogida a<br />
Refugiados e Inmigrantes - ES<br />
Madrid<br />
- NGOs should be <strong>in</strong>termediators between immigrants and adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />
- NGOs should po<strong>in</strong>t out violations of recognised immigration laws<br />
- The proposals of NGOs should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account regard<strong>in</strong>g the formulation of regularisation policies<br />
ES Fundación Andalucía ACOGE -<br />
ES<br />
- The practical experiences of NGOs with<strong>in</strong> their daily work should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account<br />
- NGOs should po<strong>in</strong>t out if immigration laws are not respected<br />
ES Asociación Vida y Salud al<br />
Inmigrante Boliviano (AVISA) –<br />
ES Madrid<br />
-NGOs play a fundamental role with respect to the formulation of regularisation policy, as we are the ones who<br />
have contact with the immigrants.<br />
- NGOs should be <strong>in</strong>volved at an early stage of policy development<br />
ES Iglesia Evangélica -ES - Through their daily practical experiences NGOs know the consequences of policy measures very well and<br />
ES Movimiento por la Paz, el<br />
Deasarme y la Libertad en<br />
Canarias (MPDLC) - ES<br />
ES Asociación Salud y Familia, UGT -<br />
ES<br />
IE Migrant Rights Council of Ireland,<br />
Dubl<strong>in</strong> (MRCI)<br />
FR<br />
EU<br />
EU<br />
FR - SNPMPI – LA PASTORALE<br />
DES MIGRANTS<br />
Europäische Vere<strong>in</strong>igung von<br />
Jurist<strong>in</strong>nen und Juristen für<br />
Demokratie und Menschrechte <strong>in</strong><br />
der Welt e. V. (EJDM)<br />
<strong>Europe</strong>an Council on Refugees and<br />
Exiles (ECRE)<br />
Note: not all respondents completed the relevant sections of the questionnaires.<br />
should be consulted by government agencies<br />
- NGOs are do<strong>in</strong>g the work different public adm<strong>in</strong>istrations should do<br />
- NGOs should be more <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> respect to the formulation of immigration policies<br />
- It´s not possible that all Spanish NGOs play an important role <strong>in</strong> respect to the formulation of regularisation<br />
policy<br />
- Overall aim: promote the conditions for social and economic <strong>in</strong>clusion of undocumented migrant workers and<br />
their families,<br />
- through: direct support to undocumented migrant workers;<br />
lobby<strong>in</strong>g at national and <strong>in</strong>ternational level also by cooperat<strong>in</strong>g with other organisations;<br />
- research.<br />
- awareness rais<strong>in</strong>g and representation of the <strong>in</strong>terests of undocumented migrant workers<br />
- Own role/position is a sensitive issues, s<strong>in</strong>ce irregular migration is a highly contested issue also with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
Church; - General role. Involvement of NGOs by government agencies often done as an alibi, not a dialogue, but<br />
a monologue.<br />
- Only little <strong>in</strong>fluence due to neglect of regularisation as a policy option on the one hand and due to a lack of<br />
<strong>in</strong>volvement of NGOs.<br />
- NGOs should be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> formulation and evaluation of regularisation policies<br />
- own lobby<strong>in</strong>g regard<strong>in</strong>g regularisation has not had a large impact, due to refusal of EU to address the issue of<br />
regularisation<br />
- NGOs are often the only actors provid<strong>in</strong>g services to undocumented migrants and hence have a major role to<br />
play<br />
- NGOs are well placed to provide <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>in</strong> policy debates and to monitor the effective and fair implementation<br />
of policies<br />
79