REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3 Regularisation practices across the EU<br />
3.1 General patterns of programmes and mechanisms<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g the division of regularisation processes <strong>in</strong>to programmes and mechanisms (as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />
Chapter 1), we have attempted to collect and collate statistical data on both of these procedures for all<br />
Member States. Despite our best efforts, and the provision of <strong>in</strong>formation by 22 countries (out of 27<br />
requested), the data are <strong>in</strong> general far from satisfactory. For regularisation programmes, we requested<br />
numbers of applications and grants of legalisation: only five countries 94 were able to provide both<br />
figures for their relevant programmes, with the majority (ten countries) cognisant of only one of the<br />
two figures. The situation with regularisation mechanisms is considerably worse, with many countries<br />
simply not record<strong>in</strong>g the data. Thus, the data provided considerably understate the award of<br />
regularised statuses by mechanisms, and to a lesser extent through programmes: for this reason, we<br />
have supplemented official data with figures taken from available research. Furthermore, it is evident<br />
that de facto regularisations of persons with ethnic ties have been completely excluded from Member<br />
States’ evaluations of their own policies. Even though, typically, ‘co-ethnics’ are awarded citizenship,<br />
the transition from an irregular status to legality is, <strong>in</strong> our view, a regularisation. The number can only<br />
be crudely estimated, but for just one country (Greece), is at a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 350,000 persons awarded<br />
either citizenship or documented as legally resident on the basis of ethnicity. 95<br />
Given the above caveats, we can state that over the period 1996-2007, just under 4.2 million persons<br />
applied for regularisation through programmes <strong>in</strong> 16 Member States. 96 If we <strong>in</strong>clude the 2006 de facto<br />
regularisation <strong>in</strong> Italy, the total number of applications exceeds 4.6 million. 97 Data on applications <strong>in</strong><br />
the framework of regularisation mechanisms are not generally available: about 305,000 persons are<br />
known to have been awarded legal status through mechanisms <strong>in</strong> eleven countries. 98 Another six<br />
countries seem to have no data on their awards of legal status through mechanisms. Thus, a total of<br />
almost 5 million persons are recorded as hav<strong>in</strong>g applied for regularised status dur<strong>in</strong>g this timeframe –<br />
either through time-limited programmes or through case-by-case regularisation mechanisms. Tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>to account the substantial miss<strong>in</strong>g data, 99 the total is easily 5.5 million. Add<strong>in</strong>g to this, the ‘miss<strong>in</strong>g’<br />
data on co-ethnics (Greece, Germany, Hungary et al.), the total number of persons <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
transitions from irregularity to a legal status may exceed 6 million.<br />
94 Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Spa<strong>in</strong>.<br />
95 A similar, although analytically dist<strong>in</strong>ct, category of persons consists of descendants of emigrants of Member<br />
State who may have a claim to citizenship of a Member State, and thus, <strong>Europe</strong>an Union citizenship. In<br />
particular <strong>in</strong> regard to Italy (where nationality legislation was changed to expand the population eligible for<br />
Italian citizenship prior to the 2005 elections), Portugal and Spa<strong>in</strong> this <strong>in</strong>volves considerable numbers of<br />
persons. It is unclear, to what extent ex-post status adjustments (i.e. registration of citizenship) takes place <strong>in</strong><br />
their country of citizenship.<br />
96 Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands,<br />
Poland, Portugal, Spa<strong>in</strong>, Sweden and the UK.<br />
97 Figures for the 2006 Italian de facto regularisation are taken from Cuttitta, P. (2008): ‘Yearly quotas and<br />
country-reserved shares <strong>in</strong> Italian immigration policy’, Migration Letters, 5/1, pp. 41-51.<br />
98 Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, F<strong>in</strong>land, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Poland, Slovakia.<br />
99 Official data on applications or grants through programmes are miss<strong>in</strong>g completely for Denmark, Estonia,<br />
Lithuania and the UK; data on <strong>in</strong>dividual programmes are miss<strong>in</strong>g for Germany, Greece, Poland and Portugal.<br />
30