REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...

REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ... REGINE Regularisations in Europe Final Report - European ...

pedz.uni.mannheim.de
from pedz.uni.mannheim.de More from this publisher
18.05.2014 Views

Policy outcomes have been evaluated primarily through the detailed case studies (Spain, Italy, Greece, France, UK, Switzerland, USA) although with reference to the pre-existing literature. Through the detailed comparative study, we identify both good and bad practices in the areas of regularisation programmes and mechanisms, and immigration policies generally (see §3.3 – Policy issues). These are then used to address specific policy issues and formulate policy proposals with the objective of promoting ‘good practices’ and bringing to the attention of Member States some of the ‘bad practices’ that we believe have been identified. The positions of Member States, social partners (trade unions, employers organisations, immigrant associations and migrant advocacy organisations) and international organisations are described in Chapters 4, 5 and 6. These are based on questionnaire responses, interviews and publicly available policy positions. Chapter 8 lists a wide range of policy options, all derived from the issues identified in Chapter 3. Our recommended policy options, based on international experiences and readings of the positions of Member States, social actors and international organisations, are presented in Chapter 9. 10

2 Previous comparative studies on regularisations and their impact 2.1 Introduction This chapter reviews selected previous comparative studies on regularisation policies in EU Member States and elsewhere. It considers how existing studies conceptualise regularisation and how they classify different regularisation measures in comparative perspective. It evaluates existing studies’ findings regarding the characteristics of regularisations and their main rationales, while enquiring into how regularisation measures fit into the overall migratory framework. Finally, the chapter reviews existing studies’ findings on the implementation of regularisation measures and their impact. Although research on regularisation practices of individual countries has now a long tradition – a growing number of studies began to appear as long ago as the early 1980s, when regularisations became more common in the context of growing restrictions on immigration 33 – it is only relatively recently (specifically, since the publication of the seminal study on regularisation practices in selected European states, carried out by the Odysseus network 34 and published in 2000 35 ) that regularisation policies have received serious attention from a comparative perspective. That the increased interested in regularisation policies from a comparative perspective roughly coincided with the communitarisation of migration policy through the Amsterdam Treaty is not simple coincidence: the role of the European Community has been a major rationale for the majority of studies. Indeed, the Odysseus study on regularisation practices was financed by the European Commission and the study was actually the network’s very first multi-country study on migration legislation of Member States from a comparative legal perspective. 36 This suggests that regularisation policy, although outside the actual scope of migration policy-making on the European level, has been a core concern from the very beginning of the development of a common European migration and asylum policy. Since then, the literature on regularisation policies has multiplied, and now includes a variety of comparative mapping exercises of regularisation practices 37 as well as numerous studies investigating 33 See, for an early study on France, Marie, C.V. (1984): ‘De la clandestinité à l'insertion professionnelle régulière, le devenir des travailleurs régularisés’. In: Travail et Emploi N°22, décembre, pp. 21-32. In Italy, first studies on regularisation programmes began to appear in the mid-1990s (see for example Massi, E. (1995): La sanatoria per I cittadini extracommunitari, Diritte e pratica del Lavoro, pp.3033f); In Spain, the first studies were published from the 1990s onwards (see for example A. Izquierdo Escribano (1990): Immigration en Espagne et premiers résultats du programme de regularisation, Rapport par l’OECD. Group de Travail sur les Migrations. Paris: OECD). In the US, numerous studies have been published following the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA). 34 See on the Odysseus network http://www.ulb.ac.be/assoc/odysseus/ 35 De Bruycker, P. (ed) (2000): Les regularisations des étrangers illégaux dans l’union européenne. Regularisations of illegal immigrants in the European Union. Brussels: Bruylant; A summary report of the study was also published as Apap, J., De Bruycker, P., Schmitter,C. (2000): ‘Regularisation of Illegal Aliens in the European Union. Summary Report of a Comparative Study’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 2, pp. 263–308. Because this summary has been more widely disseminated and is more accessible than the original French summary contained in the book, we will mainly refer to this version. 36 De Bruycker, P. (2000): ‘Presentation d’ouvrage’. In: De Bruycker, P., op. cit., pp.xxvii-xx1. 37 Blaschke, J. (2008): Trends on Regularisation of Third Country Nationals in Irregular Situation of Stay Across the European Union. PE 393.282, Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union, Policy Department C, Citizens Rights and Constitutional Affairs; J. Greenway, (2007): Regularisation programmes for irregular migrants. Report: Council of Europe. Committee on Migration, 11

2 Previous comparative studies on regularisations and<br />

their impact<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

This chapter reviews selected previous comparative studies on regularisation policies <strong>in</strong> EU Member<br />

States and elsewhere. It considers how exist<strong>in</strong>g studies conceptualise regularisation and how they<br />

classify different regularisation measures <strong>in</strong> comparative perspective. It evaluates exist<strong>in</strong>g studies’<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs regard<strong>in</strong>g the characteristics of regularisations and their ma<strong>in</strong> rationales, while enquir<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

how regularisation measures fit <strong>in</strong>to the overall migratory framework. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the chapter reviews<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g studies’ f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs on the implementation of regularisation measures and their impact.<br />

Although research on regularisation practices of <strong>in</strong>dividual countries has now a long tradition – a<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g number of studies began to appear as long ago as the early 1980s, when regularisations<br />

became more common <strong>in</strong> the context of grow<strong>in</strong>g restrictions on immigration 33 – it is only relatively<br />

recently (specifically, s<strong>in</strong>ce the publication of the sem<strong>in</strong>al study on regularisation practices <strong>in</strong> selected<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an states, carried out by the Odysseus network 34 and published <strong>in</strong> 2000 35 ) that regularisation<br />

policies have received serious attention from a comparative perspective. That the <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>terested<br />

<strong>in</strong> regularisation policies from a comparative perspective roughly co<strong>in</strong>cided with the<br />

communitarisation of migration policy through the Amsterdam Treaty is not simple co<strong>in</strong>cidence: the<br />

role of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community has been a major rationale for the majority of studies. Indeed, the<br />

Odysseus study on regularisation practices was f<strong>in</strong>anced by the <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission and the study<br />

was actually the network’s very first multi-country study on migration legislation of Member States<br />

from a comparative legal perspective. 36 This suggests that regularisation policy, although outside the<br />

actual scope of migration policy-mak<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>Europe</strong>an level, has been a core concern from the very<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the development of a common <strong>Europe</strong>an migration and asylum policy.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce then, the literature on regularisation policies has multiplied, and now <strong>in</strong>cludes a variety of<br />

comparative mapp<strong>in</strong>g exercises of regularisation practices 37 as well as numerous studies <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

33 See, for an early study on France, Marie, C.V. (1984): ‘De la clandest<strong>in</strong>ité à l'<strong>in</strong>sertion professionnelle<br />

régulière, le devenir des travailleurs régularisés’. In: Travail et Emploi N°22, décembre, pp. 21-32. In Italy, first<br />

studies on regularisation programmes began to appear <strong>in</strong> the mid-1990s (see for example Massi, E. (1995): La<br />

sanatoria per I cittad<strong>in</strong>i extracommunitari, Diritte e pratica del Lavoro, pp.3033f); In Spa<strong>in</strong>, the first studies<br />

were published from the 1990s onwards (see for example A. Izquierdo Escribano (1990): Immigration en<br />

Espagne et premiers résultats du programme de regularisation, Rapport par l’OECD. Group de Travail sur les<br />

Migrations. Paris: OECD). In the US, numerous studies have been published follow<strong>in</strong>g the 1986 Immigration<br />

Reform and Control Act (IRCA).<br />

34 See on the Odysseus network http://www.ulb.ac.be/assoc/odysseus/<br />

35 De Bruycker, P. (ed) (2000): Les regularisations des étrangers illégaux dans l’union européenne.<br />

<strong>Regularisations</strong> of illegal immigrants <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. Brussels: Bruylant; A summary report of the<br />

study was also published as Apap, J., De Bruycker, P., Schmitter,C. (2000): ‘Regularisation of Illegal Aliens <strong>in</strong><br />

the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. Summary <strong>Report</strong> of a Comparative Study’, <strong>Europe</strong>an Journal of Migration and Law, 2, pp.<br />

263–308. Because this summary has been more widely dissem<strong>in</strong>ated and is more accessible than the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

French summary conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the book, we will ma<strong>in</strong>ly refer to this version.<br />

36 De Bruycker, P. (2000): ‘Presentation d’ouvrage’. In: De Bruycker, P., op. cit., pp.xxvii-xx1.<br />

37 Blaschke, J. (2008): Trends on Regularisation of Third Country Nationals <strong>in</strong> Irregular Situation of Stay<br />

Across the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union. PE 393.282, Brussels: <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament, Directorate General Internal Policies<br />

of the Union, Policy Department C, Citizens Rights and Constitutional Affairs; J. Greenway, (2007):<br />

Regularisation programmes for irregular migrants. <strong>Report</strong>: Council of <strong>Europe</strong>. Committee on Migration,<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!