Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - 3.12.2007.pdf - PEACE Institute Charitable ...
Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - 3.12.2007.pdf - PEACE Institute Charitable ... Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan - 3.12.2007.pdf - PEACE Institute Charitable ...
MOEF RTI response received from MOEF informs a) IOA won the bid in Nov 2003. It approached MOEF for EC in October 2006 b) MOEF issued 4 Clearance letters (14.12.06; 22.1.07; 29.3.07 and 2.4.07) c) Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) expressed serious environmental concerns on the site and recommended change of site on 3.11.2006 d) First Clearance letter (EC) provided for raising only temporary ‘dismantable’ structures so that river bed could be restored to the river e) DDA served ultimatums on MOEF on three occasions 16 Jan 07, 7 March 07 and 2 April 07. f) If Akshardham could be built then why not Games Village, said DDA. g) MOEF found serious shortcomings in the CWPRS report of Feb 2007 h) 2 nd and 3 rd clearance letters on 22 Jan and 29 March 07 provided for DDA to plan for permanent or temporary structures subject to….. i) 4 th clearance letter on 2 April 07 provided for DDA to construct permanent or temporary structures subject to…… Clearly the DDA ‘extracted’ the clearance from MOEF not on merit but persuasions and ultimatums (Mockery of EIA process at MOEF)
PONDERABLE Clearly a dangerous and wrong act is happening in the RIVER BED in the city which would further compromise the ability of the river to recharge ground water and become yet another precedence for further concretisation of the river bed. Should Delhi Metro be permitted to build ‘polluting’ , ‘residential’ and ‘commercial’ structures in the river bed against High Court orders Safer alternatives exist for the games village site in the city. There are still three years to go to the Games in Oct 2010.
- Page 1 and 2: • ISSUES • CONCERNS • POLICY
- Page 3 and 4: A river is more than a water way
- Page 5 and 6: Delhi a Helpless Island RIVER YAMUN
- Page 7: Y a m u n a in D el hi
- Page 12 and 13: HARD FACTS 1. The 22 km stretch of
- Page 15: Sub Zone 05: ITO - New Rly Bridge
- Page 23: JJ removed and concretised as parki
- Page 27 and 28: World Bank / MOEF / IGIDR Study Val
- Page 29 and 30: ‘Truth’ about Global Sporting E
- Page 31 and 32: Unrealistic Hype and Extravaganza T
- Page 33 and 34: The CWG Village sits over an unstab
- Page 35 and 36: High Court of Delhi Observations of
- Page 37: Consider the facts: WHAT IS THE STA
- Page 41 and 42: DWARKA SECTOR 20
- Page 43 and 44: POLICY IMPERATIVES RIVERS IN INDIA
- Page 45 and 46: CITIZENS’ VISION FOR THE RIVER BE
- Page 47 and 48: Proposed CG 2010 village
PONDERABLE<br />
Clearly a dangerous and wrong act is happening in the<br />
RIVER BED in the city which would further compromise the<br />
ability of the river to recharge ground water and become yet<br />
another precedence for further concretisation of the river<br />
bed.<br />
Should Delhi Metro be permitted to build ‘polluting’ ,<br />
‘residential’ and ‘commercial’ structures in the river bed<br />
against High Court orders<br />
Safer alternatives exist for the games village site in the city.<br />
There are still three years to go to the Games in Oct 2010.
Change language