17.05.2014 Views

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esults, the feasibility of performing real-time adaptive environmental assesment<br />

using AREA under realistic ocean conditions will be discussed.<br />

Work supported by ONR.<br />

2:<strong>30</strong><br />

5pUW5. Optimizing multistatic sonobuoy placement. Donald R.<br />

DelBalzo, Erik R. Rike, and David N. McNeal Neptune Sci. Div. of<br />

Planning Systems, Inc., 40<strong>20</strong>1 Hwy 190 E, Slidell, LA 70461,<br />

delbalzo@neptunesci.com<br />

Sonobuoy patterns for monostatic sensors were developed during the<br />

Cold War for deep, uniform underwater environments, where a simple<br />

median detection range defined a fixed inter-buoy spacing usually along<br />

staggered lines. Oceanographic and acoustic conditions in littoral environments<br />

are so complex and dynamic that spatial and temporal variability<br />

of low-frequency signal and noise fields destroys the basic homogeneous<br />

assumption associated with standard tactical search concepts. Genetic Algorithms<br />

GAs have been applied to this problem to produce nearoptimal,<br />

non-standard search tracks for monostatic mobile sensors that<br />

maximize probability of detection in such inhomogeneous environments.<br />

The present work describes a new capability, SCOUT Sensor Coordination<br />

for Optimal Utilization and Tactics, to simulate multistatic<br />

distributed-sensor geometries and to optimize the locations of multistatic<br />

active sonobuoys in a complex, littoral environment. This presentation<br />

reviews the GA approach, discusses the new chromosome structure, and<br />

introduces a new target-centric geometry. The results show that a standard<br />

patterns are not optimal even for a homogeneous environment, b<br />

small distributed sensor clusters are preferred, and c standard patterns<br />

are grossly ineffective in inhomogeneous environments where <strong>20</strong>% improvements<br />

in detection are achieved with SCOUT. Work supported by<br />

NAVAIR.<br />

2:45<br />

5pUW6. Acoustic particle velocity and intensity calculations from<br />

tri-axial pressure gradient measurements. Melanie E. Austin and Alex<br />

O. MacGillivray JASCO Res. Ltd., 2101-4464 Markham St., Victoria,<br />

BC, Canada V8Z 7X8, melanie@jasco.com<br />

In July <strong>20</strong>04 Fisheries and Oceans Canada supported a study to investigate<br />

effects of seismic airgun signals on hearing organs of freshwater fish<br />

in the Mackenzie River at Inuvik, NWT Canada. The study required particle<br />

velocity measurements for correlation with observed biological effects.<br />

JASCO Research built a pressure gradient measurement apparatus<br />

consisting of four hydrophones mounted at the vertices of a triangularpyramid<br />

frame. The system was used to measure differential pressure from<br />

the airgun events simultaneously in three perpendicular axial directions.<br />

An attached depth-compass sensor monitored the depth and orientation of<br />

the system. Hydrophone separations were chosen to be small relative to<br />

the acoustic wavelength so that measured differential pressures correctly<br />

approximated the pressure gradients along each axis. Particle accelerations<br />

were computed directly from pressure gradients following Euler’s linearized<br />

momentum equation, and particle velocities were computed by integrating<br />

particle accelerations. Acoustic intensity was computed from the<br />

product of acoustic pressure and particle velocity. The hydrophone precision<br />

imposed a limit on accuracy of particle velocity measurements at low<br />

frequencies. Likewise the fixed hydrophone spacings defined an upper<br />

frequency limit for applicability of this method.<br />

3:<strong>00</strong><br />

5pUW7. Macroscopic sonic crystals in a wave guide. Dalcio K. Dacol,<br />

Gregory J. Orris, and David C. Calvo Acoust. Div. Naval Res. Lab.,<br />

Washington, DC <strong>20</strong>375-5350<br />

Periodical arrays of long, parallel cylinders have been shown in the<br />

published literature to exhibit acoustical properties which are analogous to<br />

the electronic properties of certain crystalline solids. Thus there are frequency<br />

bands for which no acoustic propagation through the array is allowed,<br />

with those band gaps being directionally dependent. The properties<br />

of such arrays in wave guides are examined in this work. Particular emphasis<br />

is put in investigating the properties of those arrays in wave guides<br />

that are idealized models of shallow water oceanic wave guides. The effects<br />

of those arrays on the propagation of normal modes is investigated in<br />

detail. The possibility of using such arrays in the construction of large<br />

scale underwater devices such as filters and lenses is also discussed. Work<br />

supported by ONR.<br />

2625 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 117, No. 4, Pt. 2, April <strong>20</strong>05 149th Meeting: Acoustical Society of America 2625<br />

5p FRI. PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!