17.05.2014 Views

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

FRIDAY MORNING, 20 MAY 2005 REGENCY E, 8:30 A.M. TO 12:00 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FRIDAY</strong> <strong>MORNING</strong>, <strong>20</strong> <strong>MAY</strong> <strong>20</strong>05<br />

BALMORAL, 8:15 A.M. <strong>TO</strong> <strong>12</strong>:<strong>00</strong> NOON<br />

Session 5aMU<br />

Musical Acoustics: String Instrument Design and Construction<br />

Thomas D. Rossing, Cochair<br />

Physics Dept., Northern Illinois Univ., De Kalb, IL 60115<br />

Christopher E. Waltham, Cochair<br />

Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Rd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada<br />

Invited Papers<br />

8:15<br />

5aMU1. Acoustical considerations in the design—and re-design—of the violin. Joseph Curtin Joseph Curtin Studios, 3493 W.<br />

Delhi, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, violins@josephcurtinstudios.com<br />

The violin is a highly evolved instrument which has long resisted significant changes to its design and construction. Still,<br />

acoustical research over the past several decades has shed sufficient light on the workings of the violin that makers can now consider<br />

non-traditional approaches to their craft in order to optimize the sound, playability, and consistency of their instruments. The work of<br />

researchers such as Duennwald, Haines, Hutchins, and Weinreich will be considered in terms of its usefulness as a guide to building<br />

better violins.<br />

8:40<br />

5aMU2. The violin octet and bowed string instrument design. George Bissinger Phys. Dept., East Carolina Univ., Greenville,<br />

NC 27858<br />

Modal analyses were combined with room-averaged acoustic measurements of a complete octet to assess Schellengs fundamental<br />

scaling design assumptions: similarity of shape and flat plate scaling. The scaling employed only the two lowest strongly radiating<br />

violin resonances, the main air A0 and main wood comprised of the first corpus bending modes B1 and B1 . A0 fell below the<br />

desired pitch placement (1.5 lowest string pitch, while the B1 complex generally straddled the desired placement at 2.25.<br />

Difficulties in properly scaling A0 derived partly from an unreliable theory that failed to incorporate A0 coupling to A1 first<br />

length-wise cavity mode, and partly from inability to incorporate cavity wall compliance. Wall compliance dropped A1 into main<br />

wood region even though larger instruments were designed successively shorter; the A1/A0 frequency ratio rose from 1.5 to 2.0<br />

smallest to largest. Modern models sensitive to cavity shape predict A0 and A1 within 10% over the octet, ranging over 4.5:1<br />

in length, 10:1 in f -hole area, 3:1 in top plate thickness, and <strong>12</strong>8:1 in volume. A0 radiates strongly over the octet, while<br />

surprisingly A1 is the dominant radiator in the main wood region for the large bass even though A1 was never included in the scaling.<br />

9:05<br />

5aMU3. The acoustics of hammered dulcimers. David R. Peterson Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Central Arkansas, Conway,<br />

AR 7<strong>20</strong>35, DavidP@uca.edu<br />

The hammered dulcimer, a stringed instrument played with two wooden hammers, probably originated in the Middle East, but it<br />

has become part of the musical culture of many countries. In the U. S., the folk revivial in the 1970’s sparked renewed interest in the<br />

hammered dulcimer as a concert instrument. Today, despite some consolidation in the retail market, there are still hundreds of<br />

builders, mostly amateurs, who experiment with the basic design. The most important design parameters will be discussed from a<br />

practical and acoustical point of view: soundboard size, shape, and composition, internal bracing, bridge shape, string arrangement and<br />

composition, hardness of bridge caps, hammer weight and stiffness, instrument resonances due to the unique string splitting and<br />

stiffness of the body, and soundboard modes.<br />

9:<strong>30</strong><br />

5aMU4. Classical guitar construction: The acoustician’s tale. Bernard E. Richardson School of Phys. and Astron., Cardiff Univ.,<br />

5 The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3YB, UK, RichardsonBE@cardiff.ac.uk<br />

The vast majority of guitars produced today are built according to general principles laid down in the nineteenth century.<br />

Nevertheless, the devil is in the detail, and innovative makers constantly reappraise the design and construction of instruments in their<br />

endeavors to control quality or to seek ‘‘improvement.’’ The maker’s approach, necessarily, tends to be pragmatic, but it is one which<br />

can be greatly informed by the application of relatively simple acoustical models. This paper will examine various important design<br />

aspects—for example choice of materials, body size, strutting, soundboard thickness—introducing the basis for making informed<br />

decisions.<br />

5a FRI. AM<br />

2589 J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 117, No. 4, Pt. 2, April <strong>20</strong>05 149th Meeting: Acoustical Society of America 2589

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!